The Marine With The Umbrella

[Neal Boortz]

For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.

I�ve been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don�t ever
remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk
around with treys of canap�s the White House while her �husband� was
running the show however.

There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do what
he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.

[Charles H. Sampson]

Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:

> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>
> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don't ever
> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
> function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk

> around with treys of canapés the White House while her "husband‰ was

> running the show however.
>
> There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do what
> he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
> overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.

The knee-jerk anti-Obama foolishness has gotten so absurd that it's
hard to keep up anymore. Seriously, was this even the effort required to
type it? (The same question can be asked about what I just typed.)

Charlie
--
Nobody in this country got rich on his own. You built a factory--good.
But you moved your goods on roads we all paid for. You hired workers we
all paid to educate. So keep a big hunk of the money from your factory.
But take a hunk and pay it forward. Elizabeth Warren (paraphrased)

[Steve Bartman]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 11:06:08 -0700, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
Sampson) wrote:

>Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:
>
>> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
>> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
>> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
>> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
>> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
>> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
>> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>>
>> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don't ever
>> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
>> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
>> function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk
>> around with treys of canapés the White House while her "husband‰ was
>> running the show however.
>>
>> There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do what
>> he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
>> overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.
>
> The knee-jerk anti-Obama foolishness has gotten so absurd that it's
>hard to keep up anymore. Seriously, was this even the effort required to
>type it? (The same question can be asked about what I just typed.)
>
> Charlie

This idiot who likes to post uniform regs ought to read them. Holding
an umbrella, or a meatloaf for that matter, over the POTUS is a
perfectly legal order.

Apparently this issue is all over the right-wing blogosphere as
nutjobs jizz all over themselves with statements that the president
caused a Marine to violate uniform regulations. They are unable to
distinguish, it seems, that the Marine in question was "operating" the
umbrella, not carrying it or making it a part of his uniform. He,
apparently, HAS read the regs and understands what a legal order is.
Also that the POTUS outranks the Commandant, who works for him.

Oh, a tray of canapes is not made part of the uniform when carried
either.

Steve

[Dakota]

On 5/20/2013 2:13 PM, Steve Bartman wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2013 11:06:08 -0700, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
> Sampson) wrote:
>
>> Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:
>>
>>> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
>>> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
>>> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
>>> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
>>> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
>>> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
>>> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>>>
>>> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don't ever
>>> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
>>> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
>>> function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk

>>> around with treys of canap�s the White House while her "husband� was

>>> running the show however.
>>>
>>> There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do what
>>> he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
>>> overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.
>>
>> The knee-jerk anti-Obama foolishness has gotten so absurd that it's
>> hard to keep up anymore. Seriously, was this even the effort required to
>> type it? (The same question can be asked about what I just typed.)
>>
>> Charlie
>
> This idiot who likes to post uniform regs ought to read them. Holding
> an umbrella, or a meatloaf for that matter, over the POTUS is a
> perfectly legal order.
>
> Apparently this issue is all over the right-wing blogosphere as
> nutjobs jizz all over themselves with statements that the president
> caused a Marine to violate uniform regulations. They are unable to
> distinguish, it seems, that the Marine in question was "operating" the
> umbrella, not carrying it or making it a part of his uniform. He,
> apparently, HAS read the regs and understands what a legal order is.
> Also that the POTUS outranks the Commandant, who works for him.
>
> Oh, a tray of canapes is not made part of the uniform when carried
> either.
>
> Steve
>

I twice voted for and support President Obama but I thought that
having a Marine hold an umbrella was a bad idea. The event should have
been held indoors.

It seems extremely unlikely that the President of the United States
had anything to do with the decision. President Obama walked into a
photo op for GOP hacks to whine about and did what he had to do.

Where were all the right-wing losers when US Marines and the rest of
our armed forces were spilling their blood in W's pointless adventures
in Afghanistan and Iraq? Not a peep about that but they're outraged
that a US Marine held an umbrella for his Commander-in-Chief.

[Mason Barge]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:13:18 -0500, Steve Bartman <sbar...@visi.com>
wrote:

Well, not to mention, Obama is the Commander in Chief. A Marine
uniform is whatever he says it is.

[Wayne]

"Steve Bartman" wrote in message
news:6lskp89904upemf3e...@4ax.com...

On Mon, 20 May 2013 11:06:08 -0700, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
Sampson) wrote:

>Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:
>
>> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
>> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
>> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
>> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
>> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
>> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
>> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>>
>> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don't ever
>> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
>> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
>> function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk
>> around with treys of canapés the White House while her "husband‰ was
>> running the show however.
>>
>> There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do what
>> he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
>> overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.
>
> The knee-jerk anti-Obama foolishness has gotten so absurd that it's
>hard to keep up anymore. Seriously, was this even the effort required to
>type it? (The same question can be asked about what I just typed.)
>
> Charlie

# This idiot who likes to post uniform regs ought to read them. Holding
# an umbrella, or a meatloaf for that matter, over the POTUS is a
# perfectly legal order.

Yes it is. But it does demonstrate a lack of respect for military customs,
and for the marine standing in the rain without a raincoat.

There is no reason to do what Obama did.

[Steve Bartman]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:24:48 -0400, Mason Barge <mason...@gmail.com>

True. I was trying to be sensitive to the separation of powers
argument I was sure was coming as a follow-up, the enumerated power of
Congress to make laws for the governance of the armed forces, etc. But
in my experience uniform regs come from the service secretaries,
although they delegate, as here, to others. In this case the
Commandant of the MC. Congress would get involved if appropriated
funds were needed to re-clothe the services, but the issue of design
and wearing is not something they get into.

Interesting for me, I learned that female Marines may, optionally,
carry a foldable umbrella so long as they have their saluting hand
free. Males may not.

The Navy never uses umbrellas, either gender in my experience. I think
the Air Force does. Not sure about the Army.

Steve

[Import Identity]

On 5/20/2013 4:06 PM, Dakota wrote:
> It seems extremely unlikely that the President of the United States had
> anything to do with the decision.

It is no surprise that The Irrelevant One is unable to make such a
simple decision. After all, he had not been given the script with all
the information, because he was . . . that day.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---

[Mason Barge]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 16:46:02 -0500, Steve Bartman <sbar...@visi.com>

wrote:

>On Mon, 20 May 2013 17:24:48 -0400, Mason Barge <mason...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:13:18 -0500, Steve Bartman <sbar...@visi.com>
>>wrote:
>>

[...]

>>>
>>>Apparently this issue is all over the right-wing blogosphere as
>>>nutjobs jizz all over themselves with statements that the president
>>>caused a Marine to violate uniform regulations. They are unable to
>>>distinguish, it seems, that the Marine in question was "operating" the
>>>umbrella, not carrying it or making it a part of his uniform.
>>
>>Well, not to mention, Obama is the Commander in Chief. A Marine
>>uniform is whatever he says it is.
>
>True. I was trying to be sensitive to the separation of powers
>argument I was sure was coming as a follow-up, the enumerated power of
>Congress to make laws for the governance of the armed forces, etc. But
>in my experience uniform regs come from the service secretaries,
>although they delegate, as here, to others. In this case the
>Commandant of the MC. Congress would get involved if appropriated
>funds were needed to re-clothe the services, but the issue of design
>and wearing is not something they get into.
>
>Interesting for me, I learned that female Marines may, optionally,
>carry a foldable umbrella so long as they have their saluting hand
>free. Males may not.
>
>The Navy never uses umbrellas, either gender in my experience. I think
>the Air Force does. Not sure about the Army.

Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and
Equipment), paragraph 27-27, reads: Females may carry and use an
umbrella, only during inclement weather, when wearing the service
(class A and B), dress, and mess uniforms. Umbrellas are not
authorized in formations or when wearing field or utility uniforms.

Of course generals can do whatever the hell they want to. I bet these
guys screaming about Obama's umbrella had no problem at all with
Patton's pearl-handled revolvers.

[Mason Barge]

On Mon, 20 May 2013 14:45:57 -0700, "Wayne" <mygarb...@verizon.net>
wrote:

Obama doesn't need to give a reason. He's the Commander in Chief.

The military disrespect being shown here is the lack of respect for
Obama's constitutional role as CinC.

[Ed Stasiak]

> Neal Boortz
>
> Ive been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I dont

> ever remember seeing something like this before.

http://www.realitychex.com/storage/bush-bush-umbrella.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1368892933159

[Wayne]

"Mason Barge" wrote in message
news:mk8lp8l7e1l2iai2k...@4ax.com...

# Obama doesn't need to give a reason. He's the Commander in Chief.

# The military disrespect being shown here is the lack of respect for
# Obama's constitutional role as CinC.

If you are saying that I have no respect for Obama as CinC, then I agree
with you.

[BTR1701]

In article <t%07uxqs.2$nO...@WSB.com>, Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com>
wrote:

> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to hold an
> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of the
> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>
> I�ve been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don�t ever
> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
> function

Not hardly. USSS agents and UD officers don't carry luggage and they
don't hold umbrellas.

[cloud dreamer]

Another asinine Right wing non-issue. They didn't seem to have a problem
with Republican presidents did it.

Reagan couldn't even WALK and hold his own umbrella.

http://matthewmjones.tumblr.com/post/50774559360/touche-the-internet-strikes-again

It's take a special kind of stupid to complain about stuff like this.
And Obama is handling it perfectly. He says pretty well nothing about it
and the Right buries itself.

..

[Dakota]

These idiots think the President of the United States made the
decision that a Marine would hold an umbrella for him.

[BTR1701]

In article <DumdnQxZc7QFwgbM...@supernews.com>,

cloud dreamer <reduce...@recycle.com> wrote:

> Another asinine Right wing non-issue. They didn't seem to have a problem
> with Republican presidents did it.
>
> Reagan couldn't even WALK and hold his own umbrella.
>
> http://matthewmjones.tumblr.com/post/50774559360/touche-the-internet-strikes-a
> gain
>
> It's take a special kind of stupid to complain about stuff like this.
> And Obama is handling it perfectly. He says pretty well nothing about it
> and the Right buries itself.

What I can't figure out is why you singularly worry about American
politics.

You're Canadidian, aren't you? If politics is your thing, is there
absolutely nothing going on in Canadia for you to comment on?

It's bizarre how focused all you Canadidians are on the machinations in
a country you're not even a part of.

[Joe Cooper]

BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote in news:atropos-B71277.07132521052013
@news-europe.giganews.com:

> It's bizarre how focused all you Canadidians are on the machinations in
> a country you're not even a part of.

Really? Do you know how many Americans are living in Canada?

Do you know how many of them are dual citizens?

Do you really think that what goes on in the United States doesn't have
impact on Canada?

Wow - anyone that ignorant must be a proggie.

--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/

Leftists think and act like protofascists. Control is the key. And
control through fear, threat of force, and rhetorical intimidation
is the modus operandi. (Ben Shapro, "Bullies")

[Joan in GB-W]

"Mason Barge" wrote in message

news:5c8lp85jjfts363lv...@4ax.com...

Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and
Equipment), paragraph 27-27, reads: Females may carry and use an
umbrella, only during inclement weather, when wearing the service
(class A and B), dress, and mess uniforms. Umbrellas are not
authorized in formations or when wearing field or utility uniforms.

Of course generals can do whatever the hell they want to. I bet these
guys screaming about Obama's umbrella had no problem at all with
Patton's pearl-handled revolvers.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

It's amazing the nonsense the Republicans will make into issues. This is
such a nonsensical event it buggers the mind to see the Republicans
struggling to make it a impeachable event. Someone posted a pictures of
presidents under umbrellas on Facebook. Guess what? The Bushes and Reagan
had umbrellas held over their heads, too.

[Charles H. Sampson]

American History 101: An American President died because
offopecatching a bad cold by getting wet at his inauguration. You might
wish for that, but that's a good enough reason for the umbrella for me.

[Mason Barge]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 11:57:40 -0700, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
Sampson) wrote:

>Wayne <mygarb...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Bartman" wrote in message
>> news:6lskp89904upemf3e...@4ax.com...

. . .

>>
>> # This idiot who likes to post uniform regs ought to read them. Holding
>> # an umbrella, or a meatloaf for that matter, over the POTUS is a
>> # perfectly legal order.
>>
>> Yes it is. But it does demonstrate a lack of respect for military customs,
>> and for the marine standing in the rain without a raincoat.
>>
>> There is no reason to do what Obama did.
>
> American History 101: An American President died because
>offopecatching a bad cold by getting wet at his inauguration. You might
>wish for that, but that's a good enough reason for the umbrella for me.

Haha. Good one!

[cloud dreamer]

Not only that, but the Reagan pic shows him walking from a plane with
someone holding an umbrella - not at a news conference with a foreign
dignitary.

It does bugger the mind. And it makes me laugh to see just how low
they'll go in an attempt to score points....and they're too stupid to
realize it only makes them look stupid.

..

[BTR1701]

In article <tfudnSW7cfvwTQbM...@supernews.com>,

cloud dreamer <reduce...@recycle.com> wrote:

> On 21/05/2013 1:20 PM, Joan in GB-W wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Mason Barge" wrote in message
> > news:5c8lp85jjfts363lv...@4ax.com...
> >
> > Army Regulation 670-1 (Wear and Appearance of Army Uniforms and
> > Equipment), paragraph 27-27, reads: Females may carry and use an
> > umbrella, only during inclement weather, when wearing the service
> > (class A and B), dress, and mess uniforms. Umbrellas are not
> > authorized in formations or when wearing field or utility uniforms.
> >
> > Of course generals can do whatever the hell they want to. I bet these
> > guys screaming about Obama's umbrella had no problem at all with
> > Patton's pearl-handled revolvers.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > It's amazing the nonsense the Republicans will make into issues. This
> > is such a nonsensical event it buggers the mind to see the Republicans
> > struggling to make it a impeachable event. Someone posted a pictures of
> > presidents under umbrellas on Facebook. Guess what? The Bushes and
> > Reagan had umbrellas held over their heads, too.
>
>
> Not only that, but the Reagan pic shows him walking from a plane with
> someone holding an umbrella - not at a news conference with a foreign
> dignitary.
>
> It does bugger the mind.

The word you're looking for is 'beggar' in this context, clod. However,
your ubiquitous stupidity has resulted in quite an amusing mental image
in this case.

[1,979 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

Obamahumpers eagerly promote this kind of silliness in a desperate
attempt to divert attention from his crimes of corruption.

It won't work. Barky Hussein is toast.

[1,979 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Tue, 21 May 2013 09:20:44 -0230, cloud dreamer
<reduce...@recycle.com> wrote:

>On 20/05/2013 7:15 PM, Wayne wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Steve Bartman" wrote in message
>> news:6lskp89904upemf3e...@4ax.com...
>>
>> On Mon, 20 May 2013 11:06:08 -0700, csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H.
>> Sampson) wrote:
>>
>>> Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> For those Americans who actually pay attention to something other than
>>>> Kim Kardashian and the NBA, did you happen to catch an image of 0bama at
>>>> his televised press conference yesterday? When it started raining on
>>>> 0bama (and you gotta love that!) a U.S. Marine was conscripted to
>>>> hold an
>>>> umbrella over Dear Ruler while 0bama dodged media questions. This
>>>> umbrella-holding, by the way, was in direct violation of P1020.34F of
>>>> the
>>>> Marine Corps Uniform Regulations chapter 3.
>>>>
>>>> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I don't ever
>>>> remember seeing something like this before. There are uniformed Secret
>>>> Service personnel at the White House who could have performed this
>>>> function --- but Marines? I do remember Hillary using Marines to walk

>>>> around with treys of canap�s the White House while her "husband� was

>>>> running the show however.
>>>>
>>>> There was some disturbing symbolism here. 0bama clearly will not do
>>>> what
>>>> he, as president, should do to protect men and women serving America
>>>> overseas, but the Marines can damned sure protect him from the rain.
>>>
>>> The knee-jerk anti-Obama foolishness has gotten so absurd that it's
>>> hard to keep up anymore. Seriously, was this even the effort required to
>>> type it? (The same question can be asked about what I just typed.)
>>>
>>> Charlie
>>
>> # This idiot who likes to post uniform regs ought to read them. Holding
>> # an umbrella, or a meatloaf for that matter, over the POTUS is a
>> # perfectly legal order.
>>
>> Yes it is. But it does demonstrate a lack of respect for military
>> customs, and for the marine standing in the rain without a raincoat.
>>
>> There is no reason to do what Obama did.
>>
>
>
>Another asinine Right wing non-issue. They didn't seem to have a problem
>with Republican presidents did it.
>
>Reagan couldn't even WALK and hold his own umbrella.
>
>http://matthewmjones.tumblr.com/post/50774559360/touche-the-internet-strikes-again
>
>It's take a special kind of stupid to complain about stuff like this.
>And Obama is handling it perfectly. He says pretty well nothing about it
>and the Right buries itself.

Obama has far greater fears clouding his corrupt little noggin.
Rightly so.

[trotsky]

You're an idiot. "Buggers the mind" would loosely translate to "fucks
with the mind". "Beggars the question" would translate to "brings up
the question." "Beggars the mind" translates to "Thanny is a fucking
idiot." Any questions, buddy?


--
Never post something on the internet unless you have a point of
reference. You will look like a moron otherwise.

[cloud dreamer]

He can't argue with the point, so he attacks the messenger. It's all he has.

..

[trotsky]

Did I mention that he's an idiot? If he keeps this up, I am going to
have to go all Tea Party on him: "I am outraged!"

Imagine, a "political party" based solely on having one's panties all in
a bunch.

[William December Starr]

In article <atropos-7CE977...@news-europe.giganews.com>,

I think I've asked you this before and you told me, but I don't
remember: what's UD?

Also: Boortz said "uniformed Secret Service personnel". Does
the Secret Service really have a uniform?

-- wds

[BTR1701]

In article <knjo3m$lht$1...@panix2.panix.com>,

wds...@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:

> In article <atropos-7CE977...@news-europe.giganews.com>,
> BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> said:
>
> In article <t%07uxqs.2$nO...@WSB.com>,
>
> > Neal Boortz <Boo...@WSB.com> wrote:
>
> >> I've been here for a few laps around the sun now, and I
> >> don't ever remember seeing something like this before.
> >> There are uniformed Secret Service personnel at the White
> >> House who could have performed this function
> >
> > Not hardly. USSS agents and UD officers don't carry luggage
> > and they don't hold umbrellas.
>
> I think I've asked you this before and you told me, but I don't
> remember: what's UD?

Uniformed Division

http://www.secretservice.gov/whoweare_ud.shtml

[1,983 murdered in Obama's organized communities]

On Wed, 22 May 2013 07:47:15 -0500, trotsky <gms...@email.com> wrote:

>On 5/22/13 7:01 AM, cloud dreamer wrote:
>> On 22/05/2013 8:52 AM, trotsky wrote:
>>> On 5/21/13 10:05 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>> In article <tfudnSW7cfvwTQbM...@supernews.com>,
>>>> cloud dreamer <reduce...@recycle.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> It does bugger the mind.
>>>>
>>>> The word you're looking for is 'beggar' in this context, clod. However,
>>>> your ubiquitous stupidity has resulted in quite an amusing mental image
>>>> in this case.
>>>
>>>
>>> You're an idiot. "Buggers the mind" would loosely translate to "fucks
>>> with the mind". "Beggars the question" would translate to "brings up
>>> the question." "Beggars the mind" translates to "Thanny is a fucking
>>> idiot." Any questions, buddy?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> He can't argue with the point, so he attacks the messenger. It's all he
>> has.
>
>
>Did I mention that he's an idiot? If he keeps this up, I am going to
>have to go all Tea Party on him: "I am outraged!"
>
>Imagine, a "political party" based solely on having one's panties all in
>a bunch.

Imagine the DemocRats?

[Charles H. Sampson]

1,983 murdered in Obama's organized communities <Fas...@whitehouse.gov>
wrote:

Look at the last four entries in this thread (above). Does anyone
think even one of them is an intelligent addition to the discourse?

[Rox]

Charlie, I would reply with my opinion but you simply wouldn't understand.




"Charles H. Sampson" <csam...@inetworld.net> wrote in message
news:1l3dbjz.1c792ey1q6e3dN%csam...@inetworld.net...

[Charles H. Sampson]

Rox <rep...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Charlie, I would reply with my opinion but you simply wouldn't understand.

Yet another entry at the same level. In addition, top-posted and
rethreaded.

Charlie

[Rox]

Good ole' patronizing Charlie.

"Charles H. Sampson" <csam...@inetworld.net> wrote in message

news:1l3fgcl.cv3cjk9lcrgxN%csam...@inetworld.net...

[BTR1701]

In article <1l3fgcl.cv3cjk9lcrgxN%csam...@inetworld.net>,

csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) wrote:

> > > Nobody in this country got rich on his own. You built a factory--good.
> > > But you moved your goods on roads we all paid for. You hired workers we
> > > all paid to educate. So keep a big hunk of the money from your factory.
> > > But take a hunk and pay it forward. Elizabeth Warren (paraphrased)

"You didn't build that!" --Barack Obama

[Charles H. Sampson]

Rox <rep...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Good ole' patronizing Charlie.

Let's see. Should I continue in a sub-thread I started to point out
the vacuity of some contributions to the main thread after yet another
vacous contribution? Decisions, decisions. Guess what I'm going to do.

[Charles H. Sampson]

I don't remember the context of Obama's remark, if indeed he said
it at all. Notice, however, that Warren didn't deny that the
factory-builder built the factory. Indeed, she congratulated him for it.

Charlie
--

[Professor Bubba]

In article <1l3hb0q.hj2pxcxc3yqfN%csam...@inetworld.net>, Charles H.

Sampson <csam...@inetworld.net> wrote:

> BTR1701 <atr...@mac.com> wrote:
>
> > In article <1l3fgcl.cv3cjk9lcrgxN%csam...@inetworld.net>,
> > csam...@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) wrote:
> >
> > > > > Nobody in this country got rich on his own. You built a factory--good.
> > > > > But you moved your goods on roads we all paid for. You hired workers
> > > > > we
> > > > > all paid to educate. So keep a big hunk of the money from your
> > > > > factory.
> > > > > But take a hunk and pay it forward. Elizabeth Warren (paraphrased)
> >
> > "You didn't build that!" --Barack Obama
>
> I don't remember the context of Obama's remark,

Neither does BTR.

[BTR1701]

In article <260520131645253432%bu...@nowhere.edu.invalid>,

The fact that you don't know it doesn't mean no one does.

[Rox]

Do you think anybody cares, Charlie?

"Charles H. Sampson" <csam...@inetworld.net> wrote in message

news:1l3haup.1pq85e69d2i4nN%csam...@inetworld.net...

[trotsky]

And when will your explanation be forthcoming, then?

[trotsky]

How has that ever stopped a teabagger?