Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Al Gore calls Saddam a terrorist.
2 views
Skip to first unread message
BeamMeUpScotty
May 16, 2013, 8:56:51 PM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/2013 7:33 PM, wien9al...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> Al Gore shows you Iraq was a terrorist danger. ...
> ..... Probably Gore believed the so-called evidence in the news that later turned out to be quite wrong. Blame the false "news" originators, not Gore!
>
He was VP when that speech was made, Bill Clinton was President, so Al
Gore knew more than the News papers.... they came to him for stories.
Al Gore was getting briefed by the CIA.
I didn't BLAME anyone, it was a fact that supported Jr. Bush's actions a
few years later. Al Gore said Saddam was making a nuclear weapon.
Clinton said Saddam could restart his Nuclear program in months NOT
years, when he explained his own bombing of Iraq.
Then later Bush said Saddam was hiding stuff and trying to build a
nuclear bomb again.... so all the evidence and the CIA pointed to
Saddam building a bomb and so he asked congress and 3/4 of congress
agreed that war was justified.
Liberals are delusional when they say Bush lied and started teh war on
his own.
Democrats just have a terminal case of buyers remorse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAV_UoIfgc
--
*Rumination*
#18 - The problem with the global warming theory, is that a theory is
like a bowl of ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bullshit to ruin
the whole thing.
> On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
>> Al Gore shows you Iraq was a terrorist danger. ...
> ..... Probably Gore believed the so-called evidence in the news that later turned out to be quite wrong. Blame the false "news" originators, not Gore!
>
He was VP when that speech was made, Bill Clinton was President, so Al
Gore knew more than the News papers.... they came to him for stories.
Al Gore was getting briefed by the CIA.
I didn't BLAME anyone, it was a fact that supported Jr. Bush's actions a
few years later. Al Gore said Saddam was making a nuclear weapon.
Clinton said Saddam could restart his Nuclear program in months NOT
years, when he explained his own bombing of Iraq.
Then later Bush said Saddam was hiding stuff and trying to build a
nuclear bomb again.... so all the evidence and the CIA pointed to
Saddam building a bomb and so he asked congress and 3/4 of congress
agreed that war was justified.
Liberals are delusional when they say Bush lied and started teh war on
his own.
Democrats just have a terminal case of buyers remorse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAV_UoIfgc
--
*Rumination*
#18 - The problem with the global warming theory, is that a theory is
like a bowl of ice-cream, it only takes a little dab of bullshit to ruin
the whole thing.
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
May 17, 2013, 2:28:10 AM5/17/13
to
In article <offlt.340064$Yp1.2...@en-nntp-13.dc1.easynews.com>,
BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> posted:
By Jeffrey Dissell
Letter To The Editor
The Washington Times
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
In 2003, American soldiers stepped into a bunker in Iraq
that was filled with drums, each of which was labeled
with a chemical warning in Arabic, along with the
international chemical-warning symbol. In May 2004,
American soldiers in Iraq, as publicly reported by
multiple news agencies, including NBC, were attacked
using an improvised explosive device that contained the
nerve agent sarin. Artillery shells containing a mustard
agent were also found in Iraq in 2004. These are easily
discoverable facts, not fantasy.
The Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention both define the sarin
nerve agent as an organophosphate, a family of chemicals
that happens to include Malathion, a chemical commonly
used to control garden and lawn pests. In 2003 and 2004,
it was noted throughout the news community that equipment
used to produce �insecticide� was widely found in Iraq;
in fact, I have photographs of some of that very
equipment. I also have a photograph taken in July 2003 of
soldiers sitting on an Al Samoud II missile, which was
�not there� by order of the United Nations.
�These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons
of mass destruction,� according to the commander of the
National Ground Intelligence Center. �These are chemical
weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention,
and yes � they do constitute weapons of mass
destruction,� Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed
Services Committee in June 2006.
I don�t care who clings to the lie that there were no
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but I find that
using the lie that there weren�t any as an excuse to
validate contemporary political lying regarding Benghazi,
Libya, by the Obama left to be morally disgraceful.
Jeffrey Dissell
Gainesville, Fla.
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/14/iraq-had-weapons-of-mass-destruction/
Forwarded post:
The Clinton administration spent a lot of time
documenting the anthrax Iraq had which was labelled a
weapon of mass destruction.
- Freedom of Speech Wins
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
It wasn't just chemical weapons, but they were working on
nuclear weapons, too. Remember, the Israelis flew in to
Baghdad and blew up the breeder reactor they bought from
the French. Also, the IAEA refused to let the U.S. remove
500 tons of Uranium we found. If you read near the bottom
of the article I will link, 1.8 tons had already been
enriched.
500 Tons of Uranium in Iraq
http://www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040522/news_1n22uranium.html
- DocRock
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
My son, who was in Iraq from summer 2006 to Nov. 2007,
with his AO being south of Baghdad, commented about the
WMD�s that his brigade had found.
- SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months
of Combat deployment.)
End of forwarded post.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
BeamMeUpScotty <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> posted:
>
> On 5/16/2013 7:33 PM, wien9al...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >> Al Gore shows you Iraq was a terrorist danger. ...
> > ..... Probably Gore believed the so-called evidence in the news that later
> turned out to be quite wrong. Blame the false "news" originators, not Gore!
> >
> He was VP when that speech was made, Bill Clinton was President, so Al
> Gore knew more than the News papers.... they came to him for stories.
>
>
> Al Gore was getting briefed by the CIA.
>
>
> I didn't BLAME anyone, it was a fact that supported Jr. Bush's actions a
> few years later. Al Gore said Saddam was making a nuclear weapon.
> Clinton said Saddam could restart his Nuclear program in months NOT
> years, when he explained his own bombing of Iraq.
>
>
> Then later Bush said Saddam was hiding stuff and trying to build a
> nuclear bomb again.... so all the evidence and the CIA pointed to
> Saddam building a bomb and so he asked congress and 3/4 of congress
> agreed that war was justified.
>
>
> Liberals are delusional when they say Bush lied and started teh war on
> his own.
>
> Democrats just have a terminal case of buyers remorse.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAV_UoIfgc
Iraq had weapons of mass destruction
> On 5/16/2013 7:33 PM, wien9al...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 3:30:52 PM UTC-4, BeamMeUpScotty wrote:
> >> Al Gore shows you Iraq was a terrorist danger. ...
> > ..... Probably Gore believed the so-called evidence in the news that later
> turned out to be quite wrong. Blame the false "news" originators, not Gore!
> >
> He was VP when that speech was made, Bill Clinton was President, so Al
> Gore knew more than the News papers.... they came to him for stories.
>
>
> Al Gore was getting briefed by the CIA.
>
>
> I didn't BLAME anyone, it was a fact that supported Jr. Bush's actions a
> few years later. Al Gore said Saddam was making a nuclear weapon.
> Clinton said Saddam could restart his Nuclear program in months NOT
> years, when he explained his own bombing of Iraq.
>
>
> Then later Bush said Saddam was hiding stuff and trying to build a
> nuclear bomb again.... so all the evidence and the CIA pointed to
> Saddam building a bomb and so he asked congress and 3/4 of congress
> agreed that war was justified.
>
>
> Liberals are delusional when they say Bush lied and started teh war on
> his own.
>
> Democrats just have a terminal case of buyers remorse.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JE48XHKG64
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ENAV_UoIfgc
By Jeffrey Dissell
Letter To The Editor
The Washington Times
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
In 2003, American soldiers stepped into a bunker in Iraq
that was filled with drums, each of which was labeled
with a chemical warning in Arabic, along with the
international chemical-warning symbol. In May 2004,
American soldiers in Iraq, as publicly reported by
multiple news agencies, including NBC, were attacked
using an improvised explosive device that contained the
nerve agent sarin. Artillery shells containing a mustard
agent were also found in Iraq in 2004. These are easily
discoverable facts, not fantasy.
The Environmental Protection Agency and the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention both define the sarin
nerve agent as an organophosphate, a family of chemicals
that happens to include Malathion, a chemical commonly
used to control garden and lawn pests. In 2003 and 2004,
it was noted throughout the news community that equipment
used to produce �insecticide� was widely found in Iraq;
in fact, I have photographs of some of that very
equipment. I also have a photograph taken in July 2003 of
soldiers sitting on an Al Samoud II missile, which was
�not there� by order of the United Nations.
�These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons
of mass destruction,� according to the commander of the
National Ground Intelligence Center. �These are chemical
weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention,
and yes � they do constitute weapons of mass
destruction,� Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed
Services Committee in June 2006.
I don�t care who clings to the lie that there were no
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, but I find that
using the lie that there weren�t any as an excuse to
validate contemporary political lying regarding Benghazi,
Libya, by the Obama left to be morally disgraceful.
Jeffrey Dissell
Gainesville, Fla.
http://p.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/14/iraq-had-weapons-of-mass-destruction/
Forwarded post:
The Clinton administration spent a lot of time
documenting the anthrax Iraq had which was labelled a
weapon of mass destruction.
- Freedom of Speech Wins
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
It wasn't just chemical weapons, but they were working on
nuclear weapons, too. Remember, the Israelis flew in to
Baghdad and blew up the breeder reactor they bought from
the French. Also, the IAEA refused to let the U.S. remove
500 tons of Uranium we found. If you read near the bottom
of the article I will link, 1.8 tons had already been
enriched.
500 Tons of Uranium in Iraq
http://www.utsandiego.com/uniontrib/20040522/news_1n22uranium.html
- DocRock
End of forwarded post.
Forwarded post:
My son, who was in Iraq from summer 2006 to Nov. 2007,
with his AO being south of Baghdad, commented about the
WMD�s that his brigade had found.
- SoldierDad
(Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months
of Combat deployment.)
End of forwarded post.
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.jai-maharaj
0 new messages