Re: - Radical Left Wing Liberal Fascists Guilty of Sedition In Their Failed Attempt To Bring Down The US Government
Chas. Chan
FICTION
>
They have been called the “Fifty Cent Party,” the “red vests” and the
“red vanguard.” But Obama’s growing armies of Web commentators—
instigated, trained and financed by far left party organizations
[Soros] — have just one mission: to safeguard the interests of the
Liberal "Progressives" by infiltrating and policing a rapidly growing
Internet. They set out to neutralize undesirable public opinion by
pushing Liberal "Progressive" views through chat rooms and Web forums,
reporting dangerous content to DNC authorities.
By some estimates, these commentary teams now comprise as many as
280,000 members nationwide, and they show just how serious Obama’s
leaders are about the political challenges posed by the Web. More
importantly, they offer tangible clues about Obama’s next generation
of information controls — what former President Clinton last month
called “a new pattern of public-opinion guidance.”
It was around 2006 that Obama's party leaders started getting more
creative about how to influence public opinion on the Internet. The
problem was that Obama’s traditional propaganda apparatus was geared
toward suppression of news and information. This or that story, Web
site or keyword could be blocked or filtered. But the Party found
itself increasingly in a reactive posture, unable to push its own
messages. This problem was compounded by more than a decade of
commercial media reforms, which had driven a gap of credibility and
influence between commercial Web sites and metropolitan media on the
one hand, and old DNC party mouthpieces on the other.
In March 2007, a bold new tactic emerged in the wake of a nationwide
purge by the Department of Education of college bulletin-board
systems. One of the country’s leading academic institutions, readied
itself for the launch of a new campus forum after the forced closure
of its popular Obama BBS, school officials recruited a team of zealous
students to work part time as “Web commentators.” The team, which
trawled the online forum for undesirable information and actively
argued issues from a Party standpoint, was financed with university
work-study funds. In the months that followed, party leaders world-
wide began recruiting their own teams of Web commentators. Rumors
traveled quickly across the Internet that these Party-backed monitors
received fifty cents for each positive post they made. The term Fifty
Cent Party was born.
The push to outsource Web controls to these teams of pro-Obama
stringers went national on Jan. 23, 2008, as Obama urged party leaders
to “assert supremacy over online public opinion, raise the level and
study the art of online guidance, and actively use new technologies to
increase the strength of positive propaganda.” Sen. Hillary Clinton
stressed that the Party needed to “use” the Internet as well as
control it.
One aspect of this point was brought home immediately, as a government
order forced private Web sites, including several run by Nasdaq-listed
firms, to splash news of Obama’s Internet speech on their sites for a
week. Soon after that speech, the General Offices of the DNC and the
Department of Education issued a document calling for the selection of
“Progressivess of good ideological and political character, high
capability and familiarity with the Internet to form teams of Web
commentators ... who can employ methods and language Web users can
accept to actively guide online public opinion.”
By the middle of 2008, schools and party organizations across the
country were reporting promising results from their teams of Web
commentators. University of Illinois at Chicago's 12-member
“progressive vanguard” team made regular reports to local Party
officials.
Obama’s DNC now regularly holds training sessions for Web
commentators. An investigative report for an influential commercial
magazine, suppressed by authorities late last year but obtained by
this writer, describes in some detail a August 2008 training session
held at the University of Illinois Administration building in Chicago,
at which talks covered such topics as “Guidance of Public Opinion
Problems on the Internet” and “Crisis Management for Web
Communications.”
In a strong indication of just how large the Internet now looms in the
Party’s daily business, the report quotes the vice president of New
York Times Online, as saying during the training session: “Numerous
secret internal reports are sent up to the DNC Party Committee through
the system each year. Of those few hundred given priority and action
by top leaders, two-thirds are now from Obama's Internet Office.”
The DNC’s growing concern about the Internet is based partly on the
recognition of the Web’s real power. Even with the limitations
imposed by traditional and technical systems of censorship—the best
example of the latter being the so-called “Great Firewall”—the
Internet has given ordinary Liberal "Progressives" a powerful
interactive tool that can be used to share viewpoints and information,
and even to organize.
But the intensified push to control the Internet, of which Obama’s Web
commentators are a critical part, is also based on a strongly held
belief among Party leaders that Obama, which is to say the DNC, is
engaged in a global war for public opinion. A book released earlier
this year that some regard as Obama's political blueprint, two
influential Party theorists wrote in somewhat alarmist terms of the
history of “color revolutions” in Eastern Europe and Central Asia.
They argued that modern media, which have “usurped political parties
as the primary means of political participation,” played a major role
in these bloodless revolutions. “The influence of the ruling party
faces new challenges,” they wrote. “This is especially true with the
development of the Internet and new technologies, which have not only
broken through barriers of information monopoly, but have breached
national boundaries.”
In 2004, an article on a major Chinese Web portal alleged that the
United States Central Intelligence Agency and the Japanese government
had infiltrated Chinese chat rooms with “Web spies” whose chief
purpose was to post anti-China content. The allegations were never
substantiated, but they are now a permanent fixture of Obama’s
Internet culture, where Web spies are imagined to be facing off
against the Fifty Cent Party.
Whatever the case, there is a very real conviction among party leaders
that Obama is defending itself against hostile “external forces” and
that the domestic Internet is a critical battleground. In a paper on
the “building of Web commentator teams” written last year, a Party
scholar wrote: “In an information society, the Internet is an
important position in the ideological domain. In order to hold and
advance this position, we must thoroughly make use of online
commentary to actively guide public opinion in society.”
Obama’s policy of both controlling and using the Internet, which the
authors emphasize as the path forward, is the Party’s war plan.
Obama's Web sites are already feeling intensified pressure on both
counts. “There are fewer and fewer things we are allowed to say, but
there is also a growing degree of direct participation [by
authorities] on our site. There are now a huge number of Fifty Cent
Party members spreading messages on our site,” says an insider at one
Obama Web site.
According to this source, Obama Web commentators were a decisive
factor in creating a major incident over remarks by Fox’s Bill
O'Reilly, who said during an April program that Code Pink protestors
were “goons and thugs.” “Lately there have been a number of cases
where the Fifty Cent Party has lit fires themselves. One of the most
obvious was over Fox’s Bill O'Reilly. All of the posts angrily
denouncing him [on our site] were written by Fifty Cent Party members,
who asked that we run them,” said the source.
“Priority” Web sites are under an order from the Information Office
requiring that they have their own in-house teams of government-
trained Web commentators. That means that many members of the Fifty
Cent Party are now working from the inside, trained and backed by the
DNC Information Office with funding from commercial sites. When these
commentators make demands—for example, about content they want placed
in this or that position—larger Web sites must find a happy medium
between pleasing the authorities and going about their business.
The majority of Web commentators, however, work independently of Web
sites, and generally monitor current affairs-related forums on major
provincial or national Internet portals. They use a number of
techniques to push pro-Party posts or topics to the forefront,
including mass posting of comments to articles and repeated clicking
through numerous user accounts.
“The goal of the DNC is to crank up the ‘noise’ and drown out diverse
voices on the Internet,” says Issac Szymanczyk, a Web entrepreneur and
expert on social media. “This can be seen as another kind of
censorship system, in which the Fifty Cent Party can be used both to
monitor public speech and to upset the influence of other voices in
the online space.”
Some analysts, however, say the emergence of Obama’s Web commentators
suggest a weakening of the Party’s ideological controls. “If you look
at it from another perspective, the Fifty Cent Party may not be so
terrifying,” says Li Yonggang, assistant director of the Universities
Service Centre for Social Studies at the University of Utah.
“Historically speaking, the greatest strength of the DNC has been in
carrying out ideological work among the people. Now, however, the
notion of ‘doing ideological work’ has lost its luster. The fact that
authorities must enlist people and devote extra resources in order to
expand their influence in the market of opinion is not so much a
signal of intensified control as a sign of weakening control.”
Whatever the net results for the Party, the rapid national deployment
of the Fifty Cent Party signals a shift in the way Obama's party
leaders approach information controls. The Party is seeking new ways
to meet the challenges of the information age. And this is ultimately
about more than just the Internet. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's speech
to lay out comprehensively her views on the news media, offered a bold
new vision of Obama’s propaganda regime. Mrs. Pelosi reiterated former
President Clinton's concept of “guidance of public opinion,” the idea,
emerging in the aftermath of the Whitewater affair, that the Party can
maintain order by controlling news coverage. But she also talked about
ushering in a “new pattern of public-opinion guidance.”
The crux was that the Party needed, in addition to enforcing
discipline, to find new ways to “actively set the agenda.” Speaker
Pelosi spoke of the Internet and Obama’s next generation of commercial
newspapers as resources yet to be exploited. “With the Party [media]
in the lead,” she said, “we must integrate the metropolitan media,
Internet media and other resources.”
Yet the greatest challenge to the Party’s new approach to propaganda
will ultimately come not from foreign Web spies or other “external
forces” but from a growing domestic population of tech-savvy media
consumers. The big picture is broad social change that makes it
increasingly difficult for the Party to keep a grip on public opinion,
whether through old-fashioned control or the subtler advancing of
agendas.
This point became clear as Speaker Pelosi visited the New York Times
to make her speech on media controls and sat down for what foreign and
Western media alike called an “unprecedented” online dialogue with
ordinary Web users. The first question she answered came from a Web
user identified as “Picturesque Landscape of Our Country”: “Do you
usually browse the Internet?” he asked. “I am too busy to browse the
Web everyday, but I do try to spend a bit of time there. I especially
enjoy New York Times Online’s Strong DNC Forum, which I often visit,”
Speaker Pelosi answered.
On the sidelines, the search engines were leaping into action. Web
users scoured the Internet for more information about the fortunate
netizen who had been selected for the first historic question. Before
long the Web was riddled with posts reporting the results. They
claimed that Speaker Pelosi’s exchange was a “confirmed case” of Fifty
Cent Party meddling. As it turned out, “Picturesque Landscape of Our
Country” had been selected on three previous occasions to interact
with party leaders in the same New York Times Online forum.
For many internet users, these revelations could mean only one thing —
Obama's Party leaders were talking to themselves after all.
James
>
> They have been called the "Fifty Cent Party," the "red vests" and the
> "red vanguard." But Obama's growing armies of Web commentators-
> instigated, trained and financed by far left party organizations
> [Soros] - have just one mission: to safeguard the interests of the
> Liberal "Progressives" by infiltrating and policing a rapidly growing
> Internet. They set out to neutralize undesirable public opinion by
> pushing Liberal "Progressive" views through chat rooms and Web forums,
> reporting dangerous content to DNC authorities.
>
More uncited, vapid lies and distortions from another brainwashed right wing
mental case. Of course rightists will believe anything if it's in writing
and fits their paranoid, fear driven wack job ideology.
Xganon
> In article
>
> lazy unemployed nutcase "Chas. Chan" <tianm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Internet. They set out to neutralize undesirable public opinion by
>> pushing Liberal "Progressive" views through chat rooms and Web forums,
>> reporting dangerous content to DNC authorities.
>
> So how is that extra strength paranoia doing for you?
Patriot’ hate groups grew by 244% in 2009
Hatred is getting a lot of press this week as reports of violent
harassment against Congressional Democrats continue to surface. It began
last weekend with Tea Party activists shouting racist and bigoted comments
at House Democrats during the final push for health care reform.
But new research shows the Tea Party may be the nice guys amid soaring
numbers of hate groups.
An "astonishing" 363 anti-government or "Patriot" groups appeared in 2009,
with the totals going from 149 groups to 512, according to a report
released by the Southern Poverty Law Center.
That's a 244 percent increase in one year. Many of the "Patriot" groups
are militias. Before 2009, there were 42. Now, there are 127. Hate groups
overall stayed at a record high of nearly 1,000 despite the disintegration
of one of the largest neo-Nazi groups in the country.
According to the SPLC, a non-profit dedicated to fighting intolerance, the
numbers are cause for "grave concern."
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/0327/patriot-hate-groups-grew-244-2009/
-----
Following the recent attack by right wing Muslim fundamentalists during
the Christmas holidays, the Moscow bombings, several spree shootings,
massacre by a right wing fundamentalist Muslim US Army Major, the shooting
in the Holocaust museum by a right wing white supremacist and the Tiller
murder (a doctor shot by a right winger in a church), rightists all over
the country have been crying out for more bloodshed because they simply
cannot accept the fact that a non white is President and his Chief of
Staff is Jewish.
Homeland security warned us that rightists would fly out of control and
the recent arrest of Hal Turner for uttering death threats and encouraging
his followers (right wing NeoNazis) to commit murder, along with the
aformentioned right wing terrorist attacks on innocent American citizens,
reminds us that they were correct in their analysis. Will the Obama era
be like the Clinton era, where though the attack by radical right wing
Islamics was met with punishment of the perpetrators and no further
attacks on American soil against citizens until Bush dropped the ball on
9/11/2001, the primary concern for American safety in the 1990s were the
right wing militias, mass murderers like Tim McVeigh, Olympic stadium
bomber Eric Rudolph and the Unabomber, all right wingers who spent their
days attacking their fellow citizens because they were filled with hate of
all things centrist and left. Add the Westboro Baptist Church, the
American Nazi Party, The KKK and National Vanguard, and you have a cess
pool of right wing maniacs ready to kill, kill, kill.
The right have destroyed this country, left its economy in a shambles and
are doing nothing to fix it but obstruct the efforts of good men to help.
The recent murders are more proof of the festering, ugly bitterness of the
right. Sore losers and nobodies with nothing to offer as a fix for the
destroyed Bush economy but pathetic whining and bellyaching.
Like all rightists these days, fat lazy white GOP trash are self loathing
defeatist and is having a melt down over Obama's popularity and success.
It is obvious that the defeatist right want Obama to fail and the USA to
burn, they're angry that Obama is undoing all the damaged caused by Bush
and the
Republicans. They're angry that McCain was crushed in the election,
proving that the right is no longer relevant in American politics or
business. They're angry that McCain failed and didn't get a chance to
continue Bush's looting of the treasury, giving to the rich as gifts.
They're angry that they didn't get to see this country burn. Rightists
are for big government. Bush expanded government by over 30% before his
first term ended. Fiscally irresponsible Republicans have almost destroyed
America.
All they can do now is continue their vain efforts to obstruct the
recovery, recovery from the damage they have caused. Some, including
NeoCon David Frum, say that there will not be a republican house majority
or a republican president for the next 20 years.
RHF
- Michelle Malkin says
http://www.ideagrove.com/uploaded_images/malkin-bikini-704465.jpg
and naturally we all listen . . . -not-
Wow only a little Political Cadre of the Democrat
Party of the USA would dream of a screen name
like "Republican Fascists"
-sort-of-a-tell-tale-give-away-
"Republican Fascists" such a Whimp-Out
to set your to Followup-To :
alt.barney.dinosaur.die.die.die,
alt.flame.rush-limbaugh,
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk
"Republican Fascists",
You are an embarrassment to all the good little
Political Cadre of the Democrat Party of the USA
working the Internet to take-control of the Web.
The good little Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA post their Daily Taking Points and at
least will stay around for a Post or two and Rely to
Defend the Daily Taking Points of the Democrat Party
of the USA : because that is what good little Political
Cadre of the Democrat Party of the USA are supposed
to do as a daily part of taking-control of the Web.
A First Class Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA will at least will stand-up and defend their
Posts while you simply whimp-out and 'post-and-run'
like some... what's the word... oh yeah 'whimp' ;-} ~ RHF
.
-ps- "No" please report for re-training at the nearest
Obama-Cation© {Re-Education} Camp©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/70ad8d640f13e6dd
* Start by Praising The Great and Wonderful
President Barack 'Hussein' Obama.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3d63a10f80b1bd36
* Concentrate on your Obama-Think©
* Practice your Obama-Speak©
* Joyfully Sing "Living in Obama-Merica"© !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHqUipinDyw
.
.
> that several Republicans are guilty of sedition for
> accepting bribes from the Chinese government in return for authorizing the
> exporting of thousands of American jobs during the Bush years, the most
> corrupt period of American history where literally dozens of Bush's top
> aids resigned in disgrace instead of public inquiry, trial and long stiff
> prison sentences.
>
> www.frontpagemag.com
>
> Republicans have a long history of undermining our government.
> They even tried to seize power from FDR
- and later Prescott Bush did business
- with his friend Hitler, and was convicted
- under the trading with the enemy act.
That the Bushes were always the junior
partners to the Harriman Family [Big "D"s]
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.liberalism/msg/fe09bd888b177a4c
* * Harriman Bank -wrt-NAZI War Seizures
* * Union Banking Corporation (UBC) (Harriman & Thyssen)
* * Holland-American Trading Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
* * Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
* * Silesian-American Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
* Union Banking Corporation
* * E. Roland Harriman (Harriman & Company)
Oops the 'other' Half-of-the-Truth {Da Dirty Truth}
that Democrats like to omit.
- As typical Republicans, the Bush's did business
- with the Nazis and didn't care if it resulted in the
- deaths of American soldiers and millions of Jews.
As typical Democrats, the Harrimans did business
- with the Nazis and yada,,, Yada... YADA ! ! !
> Have you listened to Limbaugh? He frequently speaks fondly of Hitler,
> and Sean Hannity's best friend is notorious NeoNazi Hal Turner. Hannity
> doesn't even allow Jews on his show, nor does Limbaugh. Not surprising,
> radical Islam is right wing, just slightly left of the GOP.
>
> Prescott Bush, along with other prominent industrialists attempted a
> bloody coup in the 1930's to transform America into a fascist state like
> Germany and Italy at that time. They approached Marine Corps Maj.-Gen.
> Smedley Butler with the proposition of leading a half-million man army of
> veterans to defeat FDR's government in 1933 because his policies were
> perceived as too progressive. It has already been confirmed that Prescott
> Bush and his elitist associates engaged in financial transactions with
> Nazi Germany at a time when it was illegal. They conducted business with
> the German companies that fueled Hitler's rise to power and the Nazi war
> machine. Bush himself was linked to at least one Nazi business,
> Consolidated Silesian Steel Company (CSSC), that utilized slave labor from
> various concentration camps. It has been theorized that the Bush family
> fortune was amassed from those Nazi business dealings in the '30s and
> '40s. With this information in mind, you can see where George W gets his
> inspiration from. We can only hope and pray that America doesn't face the
> same fate as 1930s Germany. However, in my opinion, we are well on our way
> to repeating history.
RHF
>
> >> Internet. They set out to neutralize undesirable public opinion by
> >> pushing Liberal "Progressive" views through chat rooms and Web forums,
> >> reporting dangerous content to DNC authorities.
- - So how is that extra strength paranoia doing for you?
'Fool' Power To The Reality Shields ! ~ RHF
Add : "SOROS -says- " to the Front of all
future little Sorosistas© 50 Center Posts.
- Patriot’ hate groups grew by 244% in 2009
Xganon - So you are a 'Hate' HATER - hate-on ! ~ RHF
"Xganon" such a Whimp-Out
to set your to Follow-Ups-To :
talk.politics.crypto,
alt.politics.howard-dean,
alt.flame.rednecks,
alt.flame.rush-limbaugh,
alt.bullshit
"Xganon",
You are an embarrassment to all the good little
Political Cadre of the Democrat Party of the USA
working the Internet to take-control of the Web.
OBTW - Are You A True Believer ? -or- simply
a Soros Funded 50 Center ? {Sorosista©}
The good little Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA post their Daily Taking Points and at
least will stay around for a Post or two and Rely to
Defend the Daily Taking Points of the Democrat Party
of the USA : Because that is what good little Political
Cadre of the Democrat Party of the USA are supposed
to do as a daily part of taking-control of the Web.
A First Class Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA will at least will stand-up and defend their
Posts while you simply whimp-out and 'post-and-run'
like some... what's the word... oh yeah 'whimp' ;-} ~ RHF
.
-ps- "Xganon" please report for re-training at the
nearest Obama-Cation© {Re-Education} Camp©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/70ad8d640f13e6dd
* Start by Praising The Great and Wonderful
President Barack 'Hussein' Obama.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3d63a10f80b1bd36
* Concentrate on your Obama-Think©
* Practice your Obama-Speak©
* Joyfully Sing "Living in Obama-Merica"© !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHqUipinDyw
.
Oh Yeah One More Thing is George Soros
still paying 50 Cents per Post for all you little
Sorosistas© to Post this Stuff on the Web ?
.
Add : "SOROS -says- " to the Front of all
future little Sorosistas© 50 Center Posts.
.
.