Liberal Fascism and the ComuSexual
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
Communist)
is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
Liberal Fascism
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk
Pt.5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0
Pt.6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk
Pt.7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q
Left-wing roots of the Nazis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k
Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche [N.Korea] are left-wing
brothers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ
The Liberal's Path to Socialism
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk
"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to
radical Islam."
"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."
Anyone who refutes a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist)
is a moron according to Liberals.
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj0Id3BLFco&feature=related
Rockabilly Pills
"?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:87c7c358-8fc1-4cb2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
> Communist)
> is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
Anybody who demonizes America like you belongs in a dungeon getting Bushed.
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5386 (20100822) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
Clave
"ØbaMaØ Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:87c7c358-8fc1-4cb2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
> Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
> Communist)
> is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
You don't know what *any* of those words mean.
--
Well, shit, you confused me. More than normal
-- Beldin
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
>
> > Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
> > Communist) is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
>
> Anybody who demonizes America like you belongs in a dungeon getting Bushed.
>
You are not "America".
You are a ComuSexual.
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
>
> > Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
> > Communist) is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
>
> You don't know what *any* of those words mean.
>
You don't know *squat*.
Paul Briskette
> "?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:87c7c358-8fc1-4cb2...@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com...
>> Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
>> Communist)
>> is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Idiots.
>
> Anybody who demonizes America like you belongs in a dungeon getting
> Bushed.
>
I think he would actually like that. He seems overly obsessed with
anything sex related. Typical "tea bagging" republican. (pun intended)
Topaz
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"The fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three
principal weapons, the profound reasons for which may not have been
consciously understood (though I do not believe this myself) furnishes
the best proof that the poison fangs of that Power which transcends
all State boundaries are being drawn, even though in an indirect way.
The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the suppression
of the supranational Press and the definite abolition of Marxism,
together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist
concept of the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in
the course of some years, to advance more and more the interests of
the Italian people without paying any attention to the hissing of the
Jewish world-hydra.
"The English situation is not so favorable. In that country
which has 'the freest democracy' the Jew dictates his will, almost
unrestrained but indirectly, through his influence on public opinion."
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
RHF
.
National Socialism and International Socialism
{World Communism} the Top-&-Bottom of the
Same Extreme© -by- RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/0d1b36d6a97c6355
.
Topaz
<rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>National Socialism and International Socialism
>{World Communism} the Top-&-Bottom of the
>Same Extreme© -by- RHF
The Jews control your media and your mind. Figuratively speaking, you
have your head up a Jews aft end. National Socialism really was for
the people. Communism was the phoney Jewish version. Here is a quote
from Mein Kampf:
"There were millions and millions of workmen who began by being
hostile to the Social Democratic Party; but their defences were
repeatedly stormed and finally had to surrender. Yet this defeat was
due to the stupidity of the bourgeois parties, who had opposed every
demand put forward by the working class. The short-sighted refusal to
making an effort towards improving labour conditions, the refusal to
adopt measures which would insure the workmen in case of accidents in
the factories, the refusal to forbid child labour, the refusal to
consider protective measures for female workers, especially expectant
mothers--all this was of assistance to the Social Democratic leaders,
who were thankful for every opportunity which they could exploit for
forcing the masses into their net. Our bourgeois parties can never
repair the damage that resulted from the mistake that was made. For
they sowed the seeds of hatred when they opposed all efforts at social
reform. And thus they gave, at least, apparent grounds to justify the
claim put forward by the Social Democrats--namely that they alone
stand up for the interest of the working class.
"And this became the principle ground for the moral
justification of the actual existance of the Trades Unions, so that
the labour organizations became from that time onwards the chief
political recruiting ground to swell the ranks of the Social
Democratic Party."
"the Jew seized upon the manifold possiblities which the
situation offered him for the future. While on the one hand he
organized capitalistic methods of exploitation to their ultimate
degree of efficiency, he curried favour with the victims of his policy
and his power and in a short while became the leader of their struggle
against himself. 'Against himself' is here only a figurative way of
speaking; for this 'Great Master of Lies' knows how to appear in the
guise of the innocent and throw the guilt on others. Since he had the
impudence to take a personal lead among the masses, they never for a
moment suspected that they were falling prey to one of the most
infamous deceits ever practiced. And yet that is what it actually
was."
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> The Jews control your media and your mind...
...to the SAME extent that the TOOTH FAIRY does.
ROTFL!!!
What a LAUGHINGSTOCK you are.
<bigoted SWILL flushed>
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
••• Rest in Peace •••
••• George Richard Tiller, MD •••
••• A True American HERO! •••
••• August 8, 1941 – May 31, 2009 •••
••• Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com •••
"He saved the lives of thousands of women who would've
died otherwise, thousands who would've been made sterile
or gravely injured by childbirth. He knew his life was at grave
risk. Dr. Tiller was a true Saint."
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
-- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from websites below.)
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
RHF
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:07:47 -0700 (PDT), RHF
>
> >National Socialism and International Socialism
> >{World Communism} the Top-&-Bottom of the
> >Same Extreme© -by- RHF
>
- Figuratively speaking, you have your head
- up a Jews aft end.
"T" - Every Christian Has One Rabbi . . .
and His Name Is J-E-S-U-S !
peace and love in the name of jesus ~ RHF
.
Topaz
There was a book in ordinary bookstores called "An Empire of
Their Own". It was a pro-Jewish book but it showed that the Jews ran
Hollywood.
Here are some quotes from a magazine for Jews called "Moment".
It is subtitled "The Jewish magazine for the 90's" These quotes are
from the Aug 1996 edition after the Headline "Jews Run Hollywood - So
What?":
"It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish
power and prominence in popular culture. Any list of the most
influential production executives at each of the major movie studios
will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names."
"the famous Disney organization, which was founded by Walt
Disney, a gentile Midwesterner who allegedly harbored anti-Semetic
attitudes, now features Jewish personnel in nearly all its most
powerful positions."
The head of Walt Disney studios is now the Jew Michael Eisner.
On studios that were bought out by the Japanese the magazine says:
"When Mitsushita took over MCA-Universal, they did nothing to
undermine the unquestioned authority of Universal's legendary - and
all Jewish - management triad of Lew Wasserman, Sid Scheinberg, and
Tom Pollack."
Here are some quotes from the paper "Jews Control the Media
and Rule America"
It may be rather out of date but it still explains why things are the
way they are.
"American Broadcasting Companies (ABC), Columbia Broadcasting
System (CBS), and National Broadcasting Company (NBC). Each of these
three has been under the absolute control of a single man over a long
enough period of time--ranging from 32 to 55 years--for him to staff
the corporation at every level with officers of his choosing and then
to place his imprint indelibly upon it. In each case that man has been
a Jew.
"Until 1985, when ABC merged with Capital Cities
Communications, Inc...the chairman of the board of directors and chief
executive officer (CEO) of the network was Leonard Harry Goldenson, a
Jew...In an interview in the April 1, 1985 issue of Newsweek,
Goldenson boasted 'I built this company (ABC) from scratch.'"
"CBS was under the domination of William S. Paley for more than
half a century. The son of immigrant Jews from Russia..."
"There has been no move by top G-E management to change the
Jewish "profile" of NBC or to replace key Jewish personnel. To the
contrary, new Jewish executives have been added: an example is Steve
Friedman..."
"The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
CBS is Jeff Sagansky. At ABC the entertainment division is run by two
men....nearly all of the men who shape young Amercians' concept of
reality, of good and evil, of permissible and impermissible behavior
are Jews. In particular, Sagansky and Bloomberg are Jews. So is
Tartikoff. Littlefield is the only Gentile who has had a significant
role in TV entertainment programming in recent years."
"American Film magazine listed the top 10...entertainment
companies and their CEOs...Time Warner Communications (Steven J Ross,
Jew) Walt Disney Co. (Michael D. Eisner, Jew)...Of the 10 top
entertainment CEOs listed above, eight are Jews."
"The Newhouse media empire provides an example of more than a
lack of real competition among America's daily newspapers; it also
illustrates the insatiable appetite Jews have shown for all organs of
opinion... The Newhouse's own 31 daily newspapers, including several
large and important ones, such as the Cleveland Plain Dealer, the
Newark Star-Ledger, and the New Orleans Times-Picayune; the nation's
largest trade book publishing conglomerate, Random House, with all
its subsidiaries; Newhouse Broadcasting, consisting of 12 television
broadcasting stations and 87 cable-TV systems, including some of the
countries largest cable networks- the Sunday supplement Parade, with a
circulation of more than 22 million copies per week; some two dozen
major magazines, including the New Yorker, Vogue, Mademoiselle,
Glamour, Vanity Fair, HQ, Bride's, Gentlemen's Quarterly, Self,
Home&Garden...."
"Furthermore, even those newspapers still under Gentile ownership
and management are so thoroughly dependent upon Jewish advertising..."
"the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Washington
Post. These three...are the newspapers which set trends and guidelines
for nearly all others. They are the ones which decide what is news and
what isn't, at national and international levels. They originate the
news; the others merely copy it. And all three newspapers are in
Jewish hands...The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York
Times Co. 36 other newspapers; twelve magazines, including McCall's
and Family Circle..."
"New York's other newspapers are in no better hands than the
Daily News. The New York Post is owned by billionaire Jewish
real-estate developer Peter Kalikow. The Village Voice is the personal
property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of..."
"There are only three newsmagazines of any note published in the
United States: Time, Newsweek, and U.S. News & World Report....The CEO
of Time Warner Communications is Steven J. Ross, and he is a Jew.
"Newsweek, as mentioned above, is published by the Washington
Post Co., under the Jewess Katherine Meyer Graham..."
"U.S. News & World Report... owned and published by Jewish real
estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman..."
" The three largest book publishers...Random House... Simon &
Schuster , and Time Inc. Book Co....All three are owned or controlled
by Jews...The CEO of Simon & Schuster if Richard Snyder, and the
president is Jeremy Kaplan; both are Jews too."
"Western Publishing...ranks first among publishers of children's
books, with more than 50 per cent of the market. Its chairman and CEO
is Richard Bernstein, a Jew."
"Jewish spokesmen customarily will use evasive tactics. "Ted
Turner isn't a Jew!" they will announce..."
"We are doing more than merely giving them a decisive influence
on our political system and virtual control of our government; we also
are giving them control of the minds and souls of our children..."
Topaz
"He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
Adolf Hitler
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
So many of the world's most CREATIVE and ENTRPRENEURIAL
people have happend to have been Jewish?
GOOD for them!!!
Anti-Semitic DOLTS can GET LOST!!
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "He must be...
<Anti-Semitic IDIOCY flushed>
dave
> On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:30:50 -0500,
> Topaz<mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> "The man in charge of the television entertainment division at
>> CBS is Jeff Sagansky.
I know Jeff. I had no idea. He doesn't look Jewish.
RHF
- - On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:07:47 -0700 (PDT), RHF
- - <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
- - National Socialism and International Socialism
- - {World Communism} the Top-&-Bottom of the
- - Same Extreme© -by- RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/46b78c5217fb436c
- The Jews control your media and your mind. Figuratively speaking,
you
- have your head up a Jews aft end. National Socialism really was for
- the people. Communism was the phoney Jewish version. Here is a quote
- from Mein Kampf:
Remember - Every Christian Has One Rabbi
and His Name Is : J E S U S - Amen ~ RHF
Blessed Are The Believers : For they Have Abiding Faith !
.
National Socialism and International Socialism
{World Communism} the Top-&-Bottom of the
Same Extreme© -by- RHF
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/0d1b36d6a97c6355
.
RHF
> (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:30:50 -0500,
>
- - - "The man in charge of the television entertainment
- - - division at CBS is Jeff Sagansky.
- I know Jeff.
- I had no idea.
- He doesn't look Jewish.
Not to be surprised Dave . . .
After-all some people claim that
'you' don't look like "You" ;;-}} ~ RHF
.
RHF
> "He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
> against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
> whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
> liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
> Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
> was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
> their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
> themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
> therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
> calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
- Adolf Hitler
> http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
>
> http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>
> http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Topaz - from these many posts you have proven
one thing : That you like to quote Adolf Hitler.
.
Topaz
Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
Topaz
Topaz
"He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
Adolf Hitler
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Now that America is ruled by the Jews...
It's not.
<remaining absurdities flushed>
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> " ... Jesus was most certainly not a Jew. "
>
> -- Adolf Hitler
This goes along with Hitler's being stupid enough to STOP
attacking Britain JUST before he could have conquered them,
and being MORONIC enough to invade Russia after seeing (in
history) what had happened to Napoleon.
Clearly, Hitler was FAR from being the sharpest toothpick
in the cutlery shop. Too bad he was able to con so many others
into falling for his stupidity.
RHF
> > " ... Jesus was most certainly not a Jew. "
>
> > -- Adolf Hitler
>
> This goes along with Hitler's being stupid enough to STOP
> attacking Britain JUST before he could have conquered them,
> and being MORONIC enough to invade Russia after seeing (in
> history) what had happened to Napoleon.
>
> Clearly, Hitler was FAR from being the sharpest toothpick
> in the cutlery shop. Too bad he was able to con so many others
> into falling for his stupidity.
Hitler - A Man Who Had To Kill Himself As A Result
Of The Failure of His Life's Work : Is NO Hero [.]
A Legacy of Genocidal Death and Global Mass
Destruction is NOT a Monument to Greatness [.]
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> ••• Rest in Peace •••
> ••• George Richard Tiller, MD •••
> ••• A True American HERO! •••
> ••• August 8, 1941 – May 31, 2009 •••
> ••• Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com •••
>
> "He saved the lives of thousands of women who would've
> died otherwise, thousands who would've been made sterile
> or gravely injured by childbirth. He knew his life was at grave
> risk. Dr. Tiller was a true Saint."
>
> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>
> -- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from websites below.)
>
> http://www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rightshttp://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotryhttp://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
Topaz
Liberating America From Israel
by Paul Findley
Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused
to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express
this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe
the catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during
the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S.
aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967
Arab-Israeli war.
The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any
determined president-even President Bush this very day-could prevail
and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by
laying these facts before the American people:
Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to
annex the West Bank-biblical Judea and Samaria - so Israel will become
Greater Israel. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, who maintain a powerful role in
Israeli politics, believe the Jewish Messiah will not come until
Greater Israel is a reality. Although a minority in Israel, they are
committed, aggressive, and influential. Because of deep religious
conviction, they are determined to
prevent Palestinians from gaining statehood on any part of the West
Bank.
In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of
eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged advancing
the territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of
anti-terrorism, Israeli forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle.
With due process nowhere to be found, hundreds are detained for long
periods and most are tortured. Some are assassinated. Homes, orchards,
and business places are destroyed. Entire cities are kept under
intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for
weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are
routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are
undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration
camps. None of this could have occurred without U.S. support. Perhaps
Israeli officials believe life will become so unbearable that most
Palestinians will eventually leave their ancestral homes.
Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in
most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli
violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the
precepts of all major religious faiths.
How did the American people get into this fix?
Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S.
lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper
U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from
public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive
uncritical support to Israel.
Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's U.S. lobby, open
discussion of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our
government all these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was
a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in
June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan
Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and
Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years and to this day maintain a
close watch on Congress.
For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in
either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle
East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel
have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in
previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill,
criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but
forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The
continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke
out-Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul
"Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself-were
defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel
forces.
As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily
biased in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs
year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally
lop-sided in Israel's favor, remain largely unaware that Congress
behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.
However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news
media candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate
America's complicity and complacency. When President Bush welcomed
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of
Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a man of peace" after Israeli forces,
using U.S.-donated arms, completed their devastation of the West Bank
last spring, worldwide anger against American policy reached the
boiling point.
The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or
listens to BBC. In several televised statements long before 9/11,
Osama bin Laden, believed by U.S. authorities to have masterminded
9/11, cited U.S. complicity in Israel's destruction of Palestinian
society as a principal complaint. Prominent foreigners, in and out of
government, express their opposition to U.S. policies with
unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since Bush announced
his determination to make war against Iraq.
The lobby's intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every
government center and even houses of worship and revered institutions
of higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many U.S.
Jews who object to the lobby's tactics and Israel's brutality...
Today, a year after 9/11, President Bush has made no attempt to
redress grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the
scene far worse by supporting Israel's religious war against
Palestinians, an alliance that has intensified anti-American anger. He
seems oblivious to the fact that nearly two billion people worldwide
regard the plight of Palestinians as today's most important
foreign-policy challenge. No one in authority will admit a calamitous
reality that is skillfully shielded from the American people but
clearly recognized by most of the world: America suffered 9/11 and its
aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy
in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.
Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of
helping Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should
suspend all aid until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel
seized in 1967. The suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead
to his removal from office, as the Israeli electorate will not
tolerate a prime minister who is at odds with the White House.
If Bush needs an additional reason for doing the right thing, he can
justify the suspension as a matter of military necessity, an essential
step in winning international support for his war on terrorism. He can
cite a worthy precedent. When President Abraham Lincoln issued the
proclamation that freed only the slaves in states that were then in
rebellion, he make the restriction because of "military necessity."
If Bush suspends U.S. aid, he will liberate all Americans from long
years of bondage to Israel's misdeeds.
Mr. Paul Findley, who served as a Republican congressman from Illinois
for 22 years, is the author of 'They Dare to Speak Out' and a member
of the American Educational Trust's Foreign Relations Committee.
Also See: http://www.stop-us-military-aid-to-israel.net/
Citizens for Fair Legislation ALERT: NO NEW AID TO ISRAEL
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/01/1556560.php
Congressman Paul Findley: Liberating America From Israel
http://www.mediamonitors.net/findley2.html
Pat Buchanan: Why Politicians Prefer Israel over American
Interest?
http://amconmag.com/01_13_03/buchanan7.html
Israeli Minister - 'We've Become Barbarians'
http://rense.com/general33/become.htm
Wales Politician Compares Apartheid Israel to Nazi Germany
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/page.cfm?objectid=12498073
&method=full&siteid=50082
Israel's image of liberal democracy takes a battering
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/04/wisr04.xml&s
Sheet=/news/2003/01/04/ixworld.html
Israel Bans Christian Politician and Party from Election
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1845530.stm
Israel to Expel Christian Politician and non-Jewish Parties from
Knesset
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,866348,00.html
Row over Arabs' election ban
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/01/wisr01.
xml&sSheet=/news/2003/01/01/ixnewstop.html
How Americas Zionist controlled media spin the facts.
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/98414_comment.php
American Media Controlled by Israeli Supporters
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Eric+Alterman+MSNBC+Israel&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT
F-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3caaa1d0_1%40news.tm.net.my&rnum=1
The Myth of Barak's Generous Offer
http://fair.org/extra/0207/generous.html
Direct Financial Cost of Israel to US: $1.6 trillion and
growing
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html
MAKING MERCHANDISE OUT OF THE PEOPLE OF GOD: SELLING THE UPCOMING
WAR IN
IRAQ http://www.endtimesnetwork.com/m2_s1.html
Zionism Unbound - Vidal Gored 16 Years Ago
http://www.rense.com/general32/unbound.htm
'It's Time To Get Tough With Israel' - Patriotic US Army Brig
General
http://www.rense.com/general33/tough.htm
Israel's Policy Of 'Covert Aggression'
http://www.rense.com/general31/ze.htm
ISRAEL'S SACRED TERRORISM
http://abbc.com/historia/zionism/rokach.html
The Men From JINSA and CSP
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&c=1&s=vest
JINSA Behind Drive To Cover-Up Israeli Spy Scandal
http://rense.com/general18/JINSA.HTM
Christian Coalition Abandonment of Palestinian Christians is
Hypocritical http://www.mediamonitors.net/sherri64.html
Where does world-famous televangelist's money go?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/845747.asp#BODY
Christian Patriarch of Holy Land calls for end of Oppressive
Israeli
occupation http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2604761.stm
Zionism versus the Bible - Peace and Jutice on Earth or the
Extremism of
the 'Christian' Right? http://www.mediamonitors.net/williamson4.html
THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE - Christianity & The NWO
http://www.rense.com/general20/unholy.htm
No Joy in Bethlehem
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,865083,00.html
'Saddest Christmas Ever' in Bethlehem
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pri&dt=021225&cat=news&st=newsmideas
tdc
For Unbiased News, visit:
http://www.commondreams.org
http://www.rense.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.independent.co.uk/
http://www.thenation.com/
http://www.mediamonitors.net/
http://www.antiwar.com/
http://www.fair.org/
http://www.counterpunch.com/
http://www.indymedia.org/
http://www.progressive.org/
http://www.yellowtimes.org/
http://www.latimes.com/
For Good Analysis and Commentary, visit:
http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/
http://www.robert-fisk.com/
http://www.iacenter.org/
http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/index.cfm
http://www.antiwar.com/hacohen/h-col.html
http://www.nader.org/public_interest.html
http://reese.king-online.com/
http://fair.org/media-beat/
http://avnery-news.co.il/english/
Please distribute....
Topaz
by Kevin MacDonald
The current situation in the United States is really an awesome
display of Jewish power and influence. People who are very strongly
identified as Jews maintain close ties to Israeli politicians and
military figures and to Jewish activist organizations and pro-Israeli
lobbying groups while occupying influential policy-making positions in
the defense and foreign policy establishment. These same people, as
well as a chorus of other prominent Jews, have routine access to the
most prestigious media outlets in the United States. People who
criticize Israel are routinely vilified and subjected to professional
abuse.
Perhaps the most telling feature of this entire state of affairs is
the surreal fact that in this entire discourse Jewish identity is not
mentioned. When Charles Krauthammer, Bill Kristol, Michael Rubin,
William Safire, Robert Satloff, or the legions of other prominent
media figures write their reflexively pro-Israel pieces in the New
York Times, the Wall Street Journal, or the Los Angeles Times, or
opine on the Fox News Network, there is never any mention that they
are Jewish Americans who have an intense ethnic interest in Israel.
When Richard Perle authors a report for an Israeli think tank; is on
the board of directors of an Israeli newspaper; maintains close
personal ties with prominent Israelis, especially those associated
with the Likud Party; has worked for an Israeli defense company; and,
according to credible reports, was discovered by the FBI passing
classified information to Israel - when, despite all of this, he is a
central figure in the network of those pushing for wars to rearrange
the entire politics of the Middle East in Israel's favor, and with
nary a soul having the courage to mention the obvious overriding
Jewish loyalty apparent in Perle's actions, that is indeed a
breathtaking display of power.
One must contemplate the fact that American Jews have managed to
maintain unquestioned support for Israel over the last thirty-seven
years, despite Israel's seizing land and engaging in a brutal
suppression of the Palestinians in the occupied territories - an
occupation that will most likely end with expulsion or complete
subjugation, degradation, and apartheid. During the same period Jewish
organizations in America have been a principal force - in my view the
main force - for transforming America into a state dedicated to
suppressing ethnic identification among Europeans, for encouraging
massive multiethnic immigration into the U.S., and for erecting a
legal system and cultural ideology that is obsessively sensitive to
the complaints and interests of non-European ethnic minorities - the
culture of the Holocaust. All this is done without a whisper of
double standards in the aboveground media...
Topaz
Stalin Prepared for Summer 1941 Attack
Institute for Historical Review
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v06/v06p501a_Weber.html
.. .. Suvorov assembles impressive evidence to show that Stalin was
preparing to attack Germany in 1941. Suvorov writes that on June 13,
1941, Stalin secretly began "the biggest troop movement in the history
of civilization," transferring enormous military forces to the
Soviet-German frontier. The Soviet troops were deployed there not for
defense, but in preparation for a surprise invasion. "It seems
certain," writes Suvorov, "that the Soviet concentration on the
frontier was due to be completed by July 10. Thus, the German blow
which fell just 19 days earlier found the Red Army in the most
unfavorable situation -- in railway waggons."
The Nazis and Hitler Saved Us
The really bad guys in World War 2 were the western allies, especially
the Americans. The monumental blindness and stupidity, unmatched
barbarism and sadism of America and Britain nearly brought a new Dark
Age upon a world dominated, not by them, but by the Soviet Union and
communism, Although the Nazis and fascists lost the war-their heroic
struggle with hardly any resources against overwhelming odds allowed
western civilization to survive. After 1945, it was the atomic bomb,
far above and beyond everything else, which allowed the west to
survive, even to this day-but before that, it was ADOLF HITLER who
saved us. For that he deserves our eternal gratitude and admiration.
It was HITLER who built and inspired the small coalition of the
willing to fight the good war against communism. By launching the
attack on the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 with only conventional
weapons, HITLER and Germany, and Germany's allies pre-empted STALIN's
well-prepared and massive attack to the west, and postponed a complete
Soviet victory long enough for the US and Britain to finally come to
their senses. The US and Britain eventually took up essentially the
same struggle with nuclear weapons, or at least the threat of nuclear
weapons, even when that meant possible destruction of all life on the
planet.
Friedrich Paul Berg
Learn everything at www.nazigassings.com
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> PARROTED:
> by Kevin MacDonald
>
> The current situation in the United States is really an
> awesome display of Jewish power and influence.
By ONE PERCENT of the American people???
Yeah. Right.
What a CROCK!!
You've done it AGAIN, "Topaz!" PARROTED a bunch of
mindless SWILL!
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sensible and truthful portions retained, below.
<FLUSSSSHHHHhhhhhhhh封封封 Anti-Semitic swill!!!!!>
Awww. Too bad. Nothing left. Except for
the one who posted the above, now-disposed-of
swill =>=
\/
======
\/
\/
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | |
/ O O\ | "Dawk." |
/ \ | |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c__"Topaz"_____
Topaz
Topaz
by Kevin MacDonald
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
RHF
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > The current situation in the United States is really an
> > awesome display of Jewish power and influence.
>
> By ONE PERCENT of the American people???
>
> Yeah. Right.
>
> What a CROCK!!
- You've done it AGAIN, "Topaz!"
- PARROTED a bunch of mindless SWILL!
"CC" Sort of like re-reading one of your own posts ;;-}}
-or- For that matter one of mine - oijmmsl ~ RHF
.
.
OIJMMSL = Oh I Just Made Myself Laugh :o)))
.
.
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "The Shadow of Zog" by Israel Shamir:
Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
segment of our culture and body politic". And he quotes Benjamin
Ginsberg's "The Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State":
"Jews played a central role in American finance during the 1980s, and
they were among the chief beneficiaries of that decade's corporate
mergers and reorganizations. Today, though barely 2 % of the nation's
population is Jewish, close to half its billionaires are Jews. The
chief executive officers of the three major television networks and
the four largest film studios are Jews, as are the owners of the
nation's largest newspaper chain and the most influential single
newspaper, the New York Times".
Is it a conspiracy of Jews to steal the Republic? No, no conspiracy is
necessary. In Jules Verne's juvenile novel, Children of Captain Grant,
a villain leads the captain's ship astray by placing a magnet brick
beneath the compass. The magnet does not conspire: it constrains the
compass. The sheer mass of self-involved Jews in the media acts in a
similar way and draws the superpower off its normal course. For the
media is the nerve system of a modern state. Modern democracy in
practice in a very complicated society can be compared to a
sophisticated computer. Its machinery can function successfully on one
condition: there is a free flow of information across the system.
While every input is instinctively checked and sieved on one
criterion, whether it is good for Jews..
Thus, concentration of Jews in the media created the distortion. A
takeover of every other part of industry or trade would be noticed and
reported in the media; but there is no remedy for media takeover...
Gandhi could be condemned as 'racist', for he 'noticed' the privileged
position of the British in India. By PC logic, a good American should
reply to Mahatma: yes, there are some rich and powerful Brits in
India, but there are also poor Tommy Atkinses, governesses, honest
administrators, writers like Kipling and Orwell. On the other hand,
there are powerful and rich Rajas, important Brahmins. How do you
dare, sir, to demand 'de-colonisation'! This is sheer anti-English
racism!
An old Indian Air Force officer Joe Thomas actually reminded that,
"while the population of the US today is approximately the same as the
population of India a century ago, the British in India never numbered
more than 50,000 and still ruled India. They did not rule India by
force but by dominating Indian discourse. Indians fought for the
British and put down rebellions. During the two world wars, millions
of Indians fought as volunteers for Britain. If such a tiny group
could control India, then it is not strange that 100 times that number
can influence the United States"...
Topaz
Topaz
Liberating America From Israel
by Paul Findley
Please distribute....
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> PARROTED:
[ ... ]
> Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
> positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
> assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
> segment of our culture and body politic".
By ONE PERCENT of the American people???
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
m II
I note with some interest that Israel has now cut down over a thousand
trees around a Bedouin settlement. After the hundreds of thousands of
Palestinian Olive trees already destroyed, this must have been easy for
them.
The God of the Jews must really hate trees. He started out small by
burning bushes in the days of Moses and the habit just grew.
mike
Sid9
"m II" <c...@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:4c7a...@news.x-privat.org...
.
Stupidity.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
[ ... ]
LOL!!!
>mike
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
LOL!!
> Stupidity.
(Some people have NO sense of humor!)
Day Brown
temple for their god. But then, the Christians learned how useful it was
to do the same in Europe, where the pagans regarded groves as sacred.
Whatever the Jews cut is an infinitesimal portion of what Christian have
done, and are still doing.
Where's your bitch about the Amazon rain forest being clearcut? All
Levantine scriptures have it that the earth is nothing more than the
venue in which to try the souls of men. Anything done to it his name is
justifiable.
Kevin Alfred Strom
Admittedly it was White Europeans who cut down those ancient groves,
a sinful act if anything is sinful. But they were under the thrall
of the Semites' ugly god.
A better question is this: Who cut down the sacred groves in the
hearts and minds of White people? Who separated them from their
indigenous religions and philosophies? Who tied them, perhaps
fatally, to the insane death-spiral of the goat-herder religions of
the Middle East, which bid fair to start yet another world war?
The same people who treat the Palestinians like no-longer-useful
livestock.
For the moment they still have a use for us: cannon fodder and
amazingly productive worker bees.
>
> Where's your bitch about the Amazon rain forest being clearcut? All
> Levantine scriptures have it that the earth is nothing more than the
> venue in which to try the souls of men. Anything done to it his name is
> justifiable.
Quite true. Granted that all past and present gods exist only as
memes and not as actual beings, Jehovah is still uniquely
destructive, insane, and murderous.
With my best wishes,
Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/
Topaz
Here are some quotes from "The Shadow of Zog" by Israel Shamir:
Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
Topaz
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> PARROTED:
[ ... ]
> Jeff Blankfort writes, "Ardently pro-Israel American Jews are in
> positions of unprecedented influence within the United States and have
> assumed or been given decision making positions over virtually every
> segment of our culture and body politic".
By ONE PERCENT of the American people???
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Day Brown
> Admittedly it was White Europeans who cut down those ancient groves, a
> sinful act if anything is sinful. But they were under the thrall of the
> Semites' ugly god.
>
> A better question is this: Who cut down the sacred groves in the hearts
> and minds of White people? Who separated them from their indigenous
> religions and philosophies? Who tied them, perhaps fatally, to the
> insane death-spiral of the goat-herder religions of the Middle East,
> which bid fair to start yet another world war?
>
> The same people who treat the Palestinians like no-longer-useful livestock.
>
> For the moment they still have a use for us: cannon fodder and amazingly
> productive worker bees.
>
ever had a "Jewish problem" or had the Jews start their wars and run
their banking. Nietzsche picked up on this in the Genealogy of Morals.
It was the Aryan warrior elites, not the Jews that imposed Christianity.
Trajan didnt haul all the Jews to Rome, merely the aristocracy, leaving
the serfs and slaves for new Roman masters. Who were replaced by
Byzantines, then the Caliphs, the Ottomans, and the Brits, before the
descendants of the original indigenous land owners returned.
As Native Americans how long indigenous tribal ownership rights last.
And consider that never, in the nearly 2000 years since Trajan as the
indigenous population run the place, and we see they cant run what has
been given over to their control now. They are ruled street thugs, and
would be better off if the Jews took back control.
At the same time the few smart girls born to Palestinians figure out
what life is like for women in the secular west, and therefore get the
fuck out, as Ayaan Hirsi Ali has done, they keep breeding the airheads
because their machismo is such they think the womb is just the room in
which their seed grows.
And meanwhile, Jewesses, aware of the high rates of genetic disease
among the Jews have looked it up to see Nordic Y Chromosome lines have
the lowest rates and the most robust immune systems. So, they are going
to fertility clinics, and there's an epidemic of towheads now in Israel.
The JEWs of all people, are engaging in EUGENICS!
The next generation will no doubt figure out what to do about all the
Palestinian jackass Y chromosome lines. Those here dont have a future
either.
Topaz
Liberating America From Israel
by Paul Findley
Please distribute....
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
CUNTICA
"FLUSSSSHHHHhhhhhhhh•••••• "
...............................what a loser!
Topaz
Report of Former Vice President Spiro Agnew
"The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and,
with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast
policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners
and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you're
going to find in the population. By national impact media I am
referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and
Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the
International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS' Mr. (William) Paley's
Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there's a Leonard
Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and
Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!
You go down the line in that fashion...not just with ownership but go
down to the managing posts and discretionary posts... and you'll find
that through their aggressiveness and their inventiveness, they now
dominate the news media. Not only in the media, but in academic
communities, the financial communities, in the foundations, in all
sorts of highly visible and influential services that involve the
public, they now have a tremendous voice.
Our policy in the Middle East in my judgment is disastrous, because
it's not even handed. I see no reason why nearly half the foreign aid
this nation has to give goes to Israel, except for the influence of
this Zionist lobby. I think the power of the news media is in the
hands of a few people...it's not subject to control of the voters,
it's subject only to the whim of the board of directors." (Former Vice
President Spiro Agnew)
Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
1st Statement:
"We are disturbed about the effect of the Jewish influence on our
press, radio, and motion pictures. It may become very serious.
(Fulton) Lewis told us of one instance where the Jewish advertising
firms threatened to remove all their advertising from the Mutual
System if a certain feature was permitted to go on the air. The threat
was powerful enough to have the feature removed." (Charles A.
Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941).
Charles A. Lindberg, Wartime Journals, May 1, 1941
2nd Statement:
Thursday, May 1, 1941: "The pressure for war is high and mounting. The
people are opposed to it, but the Administration seems to have 'the
bit in its teeth' and is hell-bent on its way to war. Most of the
Jewish interests in the country are behind war, and they control a
huge part of our press and radio and most of our motion pictures.
There are the 'intellectuals' and the 'Anglophiles,' and the British
agents who are allowed free rein, the international financial
interests, and many others." (The Wartime Journals)
The Jews Own The Press-The Siege
"The Jews...are at the root of regicide, they own the periodical
press, they have in their hands the financial markets, the people as a
whole fall into financial slavery to them..." (The Siege, p. 38)
Nat Rosenberg, International Jewish News
"Federation played a major part in Jewish life throughout the world.
There is a federation in every community of the world where there is a
substantial number of Jews. Today there is a central movement that is
capable of mustering all of its planning, financial and political
resources within twenty-four hours, geared to handling any particular
issue. Proportionately, we have more power than any other comparable
group, far beyond our numbers. The reason is that we are probably the
most well organized minority in the world." (Nat Rosenberg, Denver
Allied Jewish Federation, International Jewish News, January 30, 1976)
Martin Peretz, New Republic Editor-in-Chief
"Much of what you have read about the war in Lebanon-and even more of
what you have seen and heard on television - is simply not true." (New
Republic Editor-in-chief Martin Peretz)
Pastoral letter issued in 1936
"A Jewish question exists, and there will be one as long as the Jews
remain Jews. It is an actual fact that the Jews fight against the
Catholic Church. They are free thinkers, and constitute a vanguard of
Atheism, Bolshevism and Revolution...One should protect one's self
against the evil influence of Jewish morals, and particularly boycott
the Jewish Press and their demoralizing publications." (Pastoral
letter issued in 1936. "An Answer to Father Caughlin's Critics," page
98) top of page
Cecile De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135
Among modern nations with their short memories, the Jewish
people...Whether despised or feared it remains an eternal stranger. it
comes without invitation and remains even when driven out. It is
scattered and yet coherent. It takes up its abode in the very body of
the nations. It creates laws beyond and above the laws. It denies the
idea of a homeland but it possesses its own homeland which it carries
along with it and establishes wherever it goes. It denies the god of
other peoples and everywhere rebuilds the temple. It complains of its
isolation, and by mysterious channels it links together the parts of
the infinite New Jerusalem which covers the whole universe. It has
connections and ties everywhere, which explains how capital and the
Press, concentrated in its hands, conserve the same designs in every
country of the world, and the interests of the race which are
identical in Ruthenian villages and in the City of New York; if it
extols someone he is glorified all over the world, and if it wishes to
ruin someone the work of destruction is carried out as if directed by
a single hand.
The orders come from the depths of Mysterious Darkness. That which the
Jew jeers at and destroys among other peoples, it fanatically
preserves in the bosom of Judaism. If it teaches revolt and anarchy to
others, it in itself shows admirable obedience to its invisible
guides.
In the time of the Turkish revolution, a Jew said proudly to my
father: 'It is we who are making it, we, the Young Turks, the Jews.'
During the Portuguese revolution, I heard the Marquis de Vasconcellos,
Portuguese ambassador at Rome, say 'The Jews and the Free Masons are
directing the revolution in Lisbon.' Today when the greater part of
Europe is given up to the revolution, they are everywhere leading the
movement, according to a single plan. How did they succeed in
concealing this plan which embraced the whole world and which was not
the work of a few months or even years? They used as a screen men of
each country, blind, frivolous, venal, forward, or stupid, and who
knew nothing. And thus they worked in security, these redoubtable
organizers, these sons of an ancient race which knows how to keep a
secret. And that is why none of them has betrayed the others." (Cecile
De Tormay, Le livre proscrit, p. 135; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 141-143)
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, 1920
"An intelligent man, thoroughly familiar with the newspapers, can,
after half an hour conversation, tell anyone what newspaper he
reads...even high prelates of Rome, even Cardinals Amette and Mercier
show themselves more influenced by the Press of their country than
they themselves probably realize...often I have noticed that it is
according to his newspaper that one judges the Papal Bull or the
speech of the Prime Minister." (J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna,
1920; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 171)
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204
"The great telegraphic agencies of the world which are everywhere the
principal source of news for the Press (just as wholesale businesses
supply the retailers), which spreads far and wide that which the world
should know or should not know, and in the form which they wish, these
agencies are either Jewish property or obey Jewish direction. The
situation is the same for the smaller agencies which supply news to
the newspapers of less importance, the great publicity agencies which
receive commercial advertisements and which then insert them in the
newspapers at the price of a large commission for themselves, are
principally in the hands of the Jews; so are many provincial
newspapers. Even when the Jewish voice is not heard directly in the
Press, there comes into play the great indirect influences, Free
Masonry, Finance, etc.
In many places Jews content themselves with this hidden influence,
just as in economic life they consider Joint-Stock companies as the
most profitable. The editors may quite well be Aryans, it is
sufficient that in all important questions they should stand for
Jewish interests, or at least that they should not oppose them. This
is achieved nearly always by the pressure of advertisement agencies."
J. Eberle, Grossmacht Press, Vienna, p. 204; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, p. 174)
F. Trocase, L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris
"The Jewish Press of Vienna sold everything, put everything at a
price, artistic fame as well as success in business. No intellectual
production, no work of art has been able to see the light of day and
reach public notice, without passing by the crucible of the Jewish
Press, without having to submit to its criticism or to pay for its
approval. If an artist should wish to obtain the approbation of the
public, he must of necessity bow before the all powerful Jewish
journals. If a young actress, a musician, a singer of talent should
wish to make her first appearance and to venture before a more of less
numerous audience, she has in most cases not dared to do so, unless
after paying tribute to the desires of the Jews. Otherwise she would
experience certain failure. It was despotic tyranny re-established,
this time for the profit of the Jews and brutally exercised by them in
all its plentitude.
Such as it is revealed by its results, the Viennese Press dominated by
Judaism, has been absolutely disastrous. It is a work of death which
it has accomplished. Around it and outside it all is void. In all the
classes of the population are the germs of hatred, the seeds, of
discord and of jealously, dissolution and decomposition." (F. Trocase,
L'Autriche juive, 1898, A. Pierret, ed., Paris; The Secret Powers
Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 175-176)
N.H. Webster, London, 1924
"When I first began to write on Revolution a well known London
Publisher said to me; 'Remember that if you take an anti-revolutionary
line you will have the whole literary world against you.' This
appeared to me extraordinary. Why should the literary world sympathize
with a movement which, from the French revolution onwards, has always
been directed against literature, art, and science, and has openly
proclaimed its aim to exalt the manual workers over the
intelligentsia? 'Writers must be proscribed as the most dangerous
enemies of the people' said Robespierre; his colleague Dumas said all
clever men should be guillotined. The system of persecutions against
men of talents was organized...they cried out in the Sections (of
Paris) 'Beware of that man for he has written a book.' Precisely the
same policy has been followed in Russia under moderate socialism in
Germany the professors, not the 'people,' are starving in garrets. Yet
the whole Press of our country is permeated with subversive
influences. Not merely in partisan works, but in manuals of history or
literature for use in schools, Burke is reproached for warning us
against the French Revolution and Carlyle's panegyric is applauded.
And whilst every slip on the part of an anti-revolutionary writer is
seized on by the critics and held up as an example of the whole, the
most glaring errors not only of conclusions but of facts pass
unchallenged if they happen to be committed by a partisan of the
movement. The principle laid down by Collot d'Herbois still holds
good: 'Tout est permis pour quiconque agit dans le sens de la
revolution.'
All this was unknown to me when I first embarked on my work. I knew
that French writers of the past had distorted facts to suit their own
political views, that conspiracy of history is still directed by
certain influences in the Masonic lodges and the Sorbonne [The
facilities of literature and science of the University of Paris]; I
did not know that this conspiracy was being carried on in this
country. Therefore the publisher's warning did not daunt me. If I was
wrong either in my conclusions or facts I was prepared to be
challenged. Should not years of laborious historical research meet
either with recognition or with reasoned and scholarly refutation?
But although my book received a great many generous appreciative
reviews in the Press, criticisms which were hostile took a form which
I had never anticipated. Not a single honest attempt was made to
refute either my French Revolution or World Revolution by the usual
methods of controversy; Statements founded on documentary evidence
were met with flat contradiction unsupported by a shred of counter
evidence. In general the plan adopted was not to disprove, but to
discredit by means of flagrant misquotations, by attributing to me
views I had never expressed, or even by means of offensive
personalities. It will surely be admitted that this method of attack
is unparalleled in any other sphere of literary controversy." (N.H.
Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, London, 1924,
Preface; The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De
Poncins, pp. 179-180)
International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922
"It is rather surprising is it not? That which ever way you turn to
trace the harmful streams of influence that flow through society, you
come upon a group of Jews. In sports corruption, a group of Jews. In
exploiting finance, a group of Jews. In theatrical degeneracy, a group
of Jews. In liquor propaganda, a group of Jews. Absolutely dominating
the wireless communications of the world, a group of Jews. The menace
of the movies, a group of Jews. In control of the press through
business and financial pressure, a group of Jews. War profiteers, 80
percent of them, Jews. The mezmia of so-called popular music, which
combines weak mindedness, with every suggestion of lewdness, Jews.
Organizations of anti-Christian laws and customs, again Jews. It is
time to show that the cry of bigot is raised mostly by bigots. There
is a religious prejudice in this country; there is, indeed, a
religious persecution, there is a forcible shoving aside of the
religious liberties of the majority of the people. And this prejudice
and persecution and use of force, is Jewish and nothing but Jewish.
If it is anti-Semitism to say that Communism in the United States is
Jewish, so be it. But to the unprejudiced mind it will look very much
like Americanism. Communism all over the world and not only in Russia
is Jewish." (International Jew, by Henry Ford, 1922)
The Patriot (London) November 9, 1939
"There is, however, no real evidence that the Soviet Government has
changed its policy of communism under control of the Bolsheviks, or
has loosened its control of communism in other countries, or has
ceased to be under Jew control. Unwanted tools certainly have been
'liquidated' in Russia by Stalin in his determination to be the
supreme head, and it is not unnatural that some Jews, When all the
leading positions were held by them, have suffered in the process of
rival elimination. Outside Russia, events in Poland show how the
Comintern still works. The Polish Ukraine has been communized under
Jewish commissars, with property owners either shot or marched into
Russia as slaves, with all estates confiscated and all business and
property taken over by the State. It has been said in the American
Jewish Press that the Bolshevik advance into the Ukraine was to save
the Jews there from meeting the fate of their co-religionists in
Germany, but this same Press is silent as to the fate meted out to the
Christian Poles.
In less than a month, in any case, the lie has been given to Molotov's
non-interference statement. Should international communism ever
complete its plan of bringing civilization to naught, it is
conceivable that some form of World Government in the hands of a few
men could emerge, which would not be communism. It would be the
domination of barbarous tyrants over the world of slaves, and
communism would have been used as the means to an end." (The Patriot
(London) November 9, 1939; The Rulers of Russia, Denis Fahey, pp.
23-24)
G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc
"As for anyone who does not know that the present revolutionary
Bolshevist movement is Jewish in Russia, I can only say that he must
be a man who is taken in by the suppressions of our deplorable Press."
(G.K.'s Weekly, February 4, 1937, Hilaire Belloc)
Charles Sarolea, Belgian Consul
"I am quite ready to admit that the Jewish leaders are only a
proportionately infinitesimal fraction, even as the British rulers of
India are an infinitesimal fraction. But it is none the less true that
those few Jewish leaders are the masters of Russia, even as the
fifteen hundred Anglo-Indian Civil Servants are the masters of India.
For any traveler in Russia to deny such a truth would be to deny the
evidence of our own senses. When you find that out of a large number
of important Foreign Office officials whom you have met, all but two
are Jews, you are entitled to say that the Jews are running the
Russian Foreign Office." (The Mystical Body of Christ in the Modern
World, a passage quoted from Impressions of Soviet Russia, by Charles
Sarolea, Belgian Consul in Edinburgh and Professor of French
Literature in the University of Edinburgh, pp. 93-94; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, pp. 31-32)
All These Things, A.N. Field
"The reader may wonder why newspapers never mention that Bolshevism is
simply a Jewish conquest of Russia. The explanation is that the
international news agencies on which papers rely for foreign news are
controlled by Jews. The Jew, Jagoda, is head of the G.P.U. (the former
Cheka), now called 'The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs.'
The life, death or imprisonment of Russian citizens is in the hands of
this Jew, and his spies are everywhere. According to the
anti-Comintern bulletin (15/4/35) Jagoda's organization between 1929
and 1934 drove between five and six million Russian peasants from
their homes. (The Government of France now (July, 1936) has as Prime
Minister, the Jewish Socialist, Leon Blum. According to the French
journal Candide, M. Blum has substantial interests in Weiler's Jupiter
aero-engine works in France, and his son, Robert Blum, is manager of a
branch Weiler works in Russia, making Jupiter aero-engines for the
Russian Government)." (All These Things, A.N. Field; The Rulers of
Russia, Denis Fahey, p. 37)
The Cause of World Unrest (1920), Gerard Shelley
"Marxism, on which Bolshevism is founded, really did not express the
political side of the Russian character and the Bolsheviks were not
sincere Socialists or Communists, but Jews, working for the ulterior
motives of Judaism. Lev Cherny divided these Jews into three main
classes, firstly, financial Jews, who dabbled in muddy international
waters; secondly, Zionists, whose aims are, of course, well known;
and, thirdly, the Bolsheviks, including the Jewish Bund. The creed of
these Bolsheviks, according to the lecturer, is, briefly, that the
proletariat of all countries are nothing but gelatinous masses, which,
if the Intelligentsia were destroyed in each country, would leave
these masses at the mercy of the Jews." (The Cause of World Unrest
(1920), Gerard Shelley, pp. 136-137; The Rulers of Russia, Denis
Fahey, p. 37-38).
N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342
"We have only to look around us in the world today, to see everywhere
the same disintegrating power at work, in art, literature, the drama,
the daily Press, in every sphere that can influence the mind of the
public...our modern cinemas perpetually endeavor to stir up class
hatred by scenes and phrases showing 'the injustice of Kings,' 'the
sufferings of the people,' 'the Selfishness of Aristocrats,'
regardless of whether these enter into the theme of the narrative or
not. And in the realms of literature, not merely in works of fiction
but in manuals for schools, in histories and books professing to be of
serious educative value and receiving a skillfully organized boom
throughout the press, everything is done to weaken patriotism, to
shake belief in all existing institutions by the systematic perversion
of both contemporary and historical facts. I do not believe that all
this is accidental; I do not believe that the public asks for the
anti-patriotic to demoralizing books and plays placed before it; on
the contrary it invariably responds to an appeal to patriotism and
simple healthy emotions. The heart of the people is still sound, but
ceaseless efforts are made to corrupt it." (N.H. Webster, Secret
Societies and Subversive Movements, p. 342; The Secret Powers Behind
Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins, pp. 180-181)
Marcus Eli Ravage in Century Magazine, 1928
"You {non-Jews} resent us {Jews}, but you cannot clearly say why...Not
so many years ago I used to hear that we were money-grubbers and
commercial materialists; now the complaint is being whispered around
that no art and no profession is safe from Jewish invasion...
We shirk our patriotic duty in war time because we are pacifists by
nature and tradition, and we are the Arch-Plotters of Universal Wars
and the Chief Beneficiaries of those wars. We are at once the founders
and leading adherents of capitalism and the chief perpetrators of the
rebellion against capitalism. Surely, history has nothing like us for
versatility!...
You accuse us of stirring up revolution in Moscow. Suppose we admit
the charge. What of it?...You make much noise and fury about undue
Jewish influence in your theaters and movie palaces. Very good;
granted your complaint is well founded. But what is that compared to
our staggering influence in your churches, schools, your laws and your
government, and the very thoughts you think every day?...'The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion' which shows that we plotted to bring
on the late World War. You believe that book. All right...we will
underwrite every word of it. It is genuine and authentic. But what is
that besides the unquestionable historical conspiracy which we have
carried out, which we never have denied because you never had the
courage to charge us with it, and of which the full record is extant
for anybody to read?
If you really are serious when you talk of Jewish plots, may I not
direct your attention to one worth talking about? What use is it
wasting words on the alleged control of your public opinion by Jewish
financiers, newspaper owners, and movie magnates, when you might as
well also justly accuse us of the proved control of your whole
civilization...
You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are
intruders. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your
ideals, your destiny, and have played havoc with them. We {Jews} have
been at the bottom of not merely of the latest war {WWI} but of nearly
all your wars, not only of the Russian but of every other major
revolution in your history. We have brought discord and confusion and
frustration into your personal and public life. We are still doing it.
No one can tell how long we shall go on doing it...Who knows what
great and glorious destiny might have been yours if we had left you
alone.
But we did not leave you alone. We took you in hand and pulled down
the beautiful and generous structure you had reared, and changed the
whole course of your history. We conquered you as no empire of yours
ever subjugated Africa or Asia. And we did it solely by the
irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas, with propaganda...
Take the three principal revolutions in modern times, the French, the
American and Russian. What are they but the triumph of the Jewish idea
of social, political and economic justice? And the end is still a long
way off. We still dominate you...
Is it any wonder you resent us? We have put a clog upon your progress.
We have imposed upon you an alien book {Scofield Bible} and alien
faith {Judeo-Christianity, a false Christianity} which is at
cross-purposes with your native spirit, which keeps you everlastingly
ill-at-ease, and which you lack the spirit either to reject or to
accept in full...We have merely divided your soul, confused your
impulses, paralyzed your desires...
So why should you not resent us? If we were in your place we should
probably dislike you more cordially than you do us. But we should make
no bones about telling you why...You Christians worry and complain
about the Jew's influence in your civilization. We are, you say, an
international people, a compact minority in your midst, with
traditions, interests, aspirations and objectives distinct from your
own. And you declare that this state of affairs is a measure of your
orderly development; it muddles your destiny. I do not altogether see
the danger. Your world has always been ruled by minorities; and it
seems to me a matter of indifference what remote origin and professed
creed of the governing clique is. The influence, on the other hand, is
certainly there, and it is vastly greater and more insidious than you
appear to realize...
That is what puzzles and amuses and sometimes exasperates us about
your game of Jew-baiting. It sounds so portentous. You go about
whispering terrifyingly of the hand of the Jew in this and that and
the other thing. It makes us quake. We are conscious of the injury we
did when we imposed upon you our alien faith and traditions. And then
you specify and talk vaguely of Jewish financiers and Jewish motion
picture promoters, and our terror dissolves in laughter. The Gentiles,
we see with relief, will never know the real blackness of our
crimes...
You call us subversive, agitators, revolution mongers. It is the
truth, and I cower at your discovery...We undoubtedly had a sizable
finger in the Lutheran Rebellion, and it is simply a fact that we were
the prime movers in the Bourgeois Democratic Revolutions of the
century before last, both in France and America. If we were not, we
did not know our own interests. The Republican revolutions of the 18th
Century freed us of our age-long political and social disabilities.
They benefited us...You go on rattling of Jewish conspiracies and cite
as instances the Great War and the Russian Revolution! Can you wonder
that we Jews have always taken your anti-Semites rather lightly, as
long as they did not resort to violence?" (Marcus Eli Ravage (Big
Destruction Hammer of God), member of the staff of the New York
Tribune, "A Real Case Against the Jews," in Century Magazine,
January-February, 1928).
John Swinton, Former Chief of The New York Times
"We know the powers that are defying the people...Our Government is in
the hands of pirates. All the power of politics, and of Congress, and
of the administration is under the control of the moneyed
interests...The adversary has the force of capital, thousands of
millions of which are in his hand...He will grasp the knife of law,
which he has so often wielded in his interest. He will lay hold of his
forces in the legislature. He will make use of his forces in the
press, which are always waiting for the wink, which is as good as a
nod to a blind horse... Political rings are managed by skillful and
unscrupulous political gamblers, who possess the 'machine' by which
the populace are at once controlled and crushed." (John Swinton,
Former Chief of The New York Times, in his book, A Momentous Question:
The Respective Attitudes of Labor and Capital)
CHRISTEA, PATRIARCH. 20th century Romanian prelate.
"The Jews have caused an epidemic of corruption and social unrest.
They monopolize the press, which, with foreign help, flays all the
spiritual treasures of the Romanians. To defend ourselves is a
national and patriotic duty - not anti-Semitism. Lack of measures to
get rid of the plague would indicate that we are lazy cowards who let
ourselves be carried alive to our graves. Why should we not get rid of
these parasites who suck Romanian and Christian blood? It is logical
and holy to react against them." (New York Herald Tribune, August 17,
1937)
Topaz
Obviously CUNTICA should be flushed down a toilet.
But on usenet we should write of things more political and important:
Here are quotes from a speech delivered by Dr. Joseph Goebbels
at the National Socialist Party Congress, Nuernberg, 1937.
"'Spain represents the world at the cross-roads.' Thus wrote
the Bolshevic press organ, Die Rundschau, in its issue dated July 22,
1937. That one sentance precisely defines the international
significance of the Spanish problem. It states exactly what the
Spanish problem is. Here the final decision must lie either with
Bolshevism or the principle of Authority. On the one side stands
ruinous anarchy and, on the other, orderly constructive development."
"Nations which in recent years have kept their eyes closed to
the startling growth of the international Bolshevic menace will one
day experience a terrible awakening from this moral narcosis. The fact
that we, German National Socialists, as conscious and uncompromising
protaganists against the Bolshevic world-front, are still condemned to
play the part of a preacher in the wilderness, calling out to deaf
ears--this cannot prevent us from seeing things as they are and
calling them by their right names. For if the constantly increasing
extension of this Bolshevic infection in Europe should cause still
greater disaster, then future historians will be in a position to
record the fact that we, German National Socialists, were not among
those who allowed themselves to be led astray in the universal chaos
of thought and mental fog purposely created as a sort of smoke-screen
by an insidious epidemic of political propaganda. Nothing could make
us deviate in the least from the straight road we have taken.
"From the very nature of the case it is obvious that the
subversive forces of International Jewry will raise a tumult of rage
when we clearly and dispassionately lay bare the background of this
revolutionary developement which is extending through the world. For,
after all, they are the only people who are drawing profit forn the
chaotic ruin which Bolshevism is bringing upon mankind. That on this
account they will swamp us with a torrrent of abuse and lies and
calumnies is only an honour for us and a further proof that we are
right in warning Europe against this peril."
"The fight which General Franco is waging, with the support of all
the constructive elements, against the Bolshevic menace to his native
land is at the same time a fight for civilization."
"The Moscow Comintern never tires of impressing on public
opinion thoughout the world the theory that the national movement,
which on July 17, 1936, intervened in the seething developements in
Spain, was a military rising oragnised by reactionary generals and
that this rising was definately repudiated by the Spanish people. The
truth however is that this national movement was in reality an act of
self-defence on the part of the people, against the revolt which had
been planned by the Spanish Communist Party for that time and was
subsequently postponed to August 1936. This communist revolt had been
planned in Moscow several years previously, organized from Moscow and
directed from Moscow, and is still being carried out in practice from
Moscow today."
"In 1935 the annual funds which Moscow contributed for the
support of the Communist Party in Spain totalled several million
pesetas, of which two millions were officially acknowledged as having
been paid by the Comintern itself. At the 7th World Congress of the
Comintern in Moscow, in 1935, Dimitroff gave instructions for the
formation of a Front Populaire in Spain. Between February 16 and April
19,1936, 140 people were murdered by gangs of red revolutionaries, and
529 buildings were burned down and destroyed before the Bolshevic
Revolution officially broke out."
"We can account for this baffling style of mutual admiration
between Bolshevism and Western Liberalist Intellectualism only if we
assume it to be some form of mental disease."
"During February and March 101 Russian Soviet aeroplanes were shipped
from Reval to Spain. And on March 1st, 50 heavy guns from Soviet
Russia were brought overland to Almansa. Recently one single large
consignment of was material from Soviet Russia to the Reds in Spain
included 100 heavy tanks, 500 medium-sized tanks, 2000 light tanks,
4000 heavy machine guns, 6000 light machine guns and 300 aeroplanes,
with their pilots."
"I shall now deal with some instances which will help to give an
idea of the extent to which World Liberalism goes in its moral support
of the Reds in Spain. I have already emphasized the fact that the
marriage between Bolshevism and Democracy presents some uncanny
features; indeed one might call them downright perverse. In the
historical developement of its activities Democracy has more and more
become the political facade of World Capitalism. Bolshevism now
carries the democratic principle to its ultimate logical application.
We may call it the Democracy of Terror. It increases the pace of that
sanguinary and pitiless developement of which Liberalism had already
mapped out the path. I might illustrate this point by a rather drastic
comparison. In democracy leading heads were out-voted by the counting
of heads. In Bolshevism the same result is obtained by chopping off
heads with the guillotine. The result in both cases is the same. The
heads are wanting. The masses are robbed of their natural leaders and
left prey to international Jews, who are now free to exercise their
dictatorship by the employment of terrorization and money."
"Pleasing catchwords were used to win the favour of the
workers but when the communist leaders came into power social terror
became the rule of the day. Among the workers and peasant classes
hunger prevailed, as symbol and sign of the Bolshevic rule."
"In keeping with the Soviet Russian pettern, family life and
the instituton of marriage are being ruined by this world plague.
Degradation of married women, the socialization of women, the
martyrdom of children--these are the principles which are in vogue
here."
"According to the 'Daily Mail' of August 22, 1936, Twenty-eight
nuns from the convent of Santa Clara "were subjected to inconceivable
tortures by relays of red maniacs."
"But Bolshevism in practice is nothing better than the most
frightful find of barbarism. It is the outward expression of the
hatred of the underworld agianst all those who are representative of
Western civilization and a cultural level to which Bolshevism can
never hope to attain."
"Among the 20,000 churches and monasteries which the Reds have
plundered and destroyed many were of historical and architectual
significance which cannot be replaced."
"But the churches of the world remain passive to it all and do not
seem to have the least suspicion as to the deadly menace that
threatens them. This is where Bolshevism shows itself again as the
incarnation of evil. Its destructive influence on the popular
religious instinct goes to the very roots of that instinct itself. And
this ruthless atheistic campaign spares nothing whatsoever which might
serve to remind the people of God and religion. The one fact alone
that the Fuerer has saved the German churches from this fate should be
enough to make them feel bound to remain eternally thankful to him.
But instead of this they never tire of going beyond the sphere of
their religious duties, interfering in political matters and making
their influence felt in a way that has no connection whatsoever with
their duties or their divine calling."
"According to indisputable figures based exclusively on
Bolshevic statistics, 42,000 priests have been murdered in Russia. Up
to February 2,1937, approximately 17,000 priests and monks and eleven
bishops were murdered in Spain."
"A Swedish refugee stated, on November 10, 1936: 'I have seen
churches on the walls of which the murdered bodies of women were hung,
nuns that had been beheaded or burned and whose bodies had been nailed
in rows to the church walls."
"The Strassburg paper, 'Der Elsasser', in its issue of
February 27, 1937 published the staggering fact that '50,000 Spanish
children are at the present moment wandering through Spanish
provinces, abandoned and in rags. All public activities for the
welfare of the youth have been abolished. And so the youngsters, very
often no more than four or five years old, are left no alternative.
They stagger along the road in swarms, shivering with cold and are
nothing more than wandering skeletons.'"
"One shudders to think what might happen to humanity if this
system became universal throughout the world."
"Bolshevism and its 'friendly press' throughout the world lose no
opportunity of pointing an accusing finger at the alleged use of
terror in countries which are governed according to the principles of
authority. The whole world gives a cry of agonizing sympathy when, for
example, a Jew in Germany receives a well-earned box on the ears. But
what is this when compared with the terror that disrupts whole
nations"
"Lenin himself, when asked at the 12th Congress of the Red Party,
what were the principles on which Communism relied, answered: 'Murder,
destruction, not a stone to be left in place if its removal should be
to the advantage of the Revolution.'"
"The Jewish Soviet Ambassador in London finds it convenient to
express his moral indignation before the Non-Intervention Committee in
London. The world and the League of Nations are hypocritically
appealed to. Before these tribunals the Jew Litwinow-Finkelstein plays
the part of the civilised philistine and fills Europe with cries of
protest."
"The Intenational Brigades which are sent into action on the Red
Spanish front are commanded by Soviet officers. Their commander was
the Jew, General Kleber."
"We shall not be deterred from pointing to the Jew as the inspirer,
the instigator and the beneficiary of the dreadful catastrophe."
"At Barcelona he sits, in the person of Wladimer Bischitzki as
director of the international oragnization for the smuggling of arms
and munitions, comrades Lurje and Fuchs, of his own racial breed,
sitting by his side. His Paris agents are his racial compatriots,
Fratkin, Rosenfeld and Schapiro. At Hirtenberg in Austria their
collaborator is the Jew, Mandl. In Amsterdam the Jew, Wolf. In
Rotteerdam the Jews, Cohen, Gruenfeld, Kirsch, and Simon. In Denmark
the Jew, Moses Israel Diamant. In Prague the Jews, Kindler, Kahn,
Abter and Hithner. We know them all and we know them well."
"The fact that Western Liberalism closes its eyes to this evil
portent is only a sign of its almost childish naivety."
"A struggle for native land and liberty, for honour and family
and God and religion, for wife and child, for school and upbringing,
for order, moral principle, culture and civilization, for our lives
and our daily bread , has begun. In Germany it has already been
brought to a triumphant issue."
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Obviously CUNTICA...
...has YOUR number, spot on!!
> But on usenet we should write of things more political
> and important.
If you should ever decide to DO that, give us a head's-up
FIRST. So we don't all die of shock!
And... you CAN write? All we ever see you do in here
is PARROT abject nonsense that IDIOTS have written.
Nickname unavailable
uses Nazi techniques to rally the mob:New agencies all the world over
are for the most part in the hands of Jews:If you substitute liberal
for jew you have the same language
http://moronia.us/front/2009/12/back-to-the-30’s-how-the-gop-uses-nazi-techniques-to-rally-the-mob/
Back to the ‘30s: how the GOP uses Nazi techniques to rally the mob
December 10, 2009
Posted by Jules Siegel
By Hrafnkell Haraldsson
Instead of Der Angriff and the Völkischer Beobachter we have FOX News
and World Net Daily. Instead of Joseph Goebbels and Alfred Rosenberg
we have Rupert Murdoch and Joseph Farah. These media outlets spout
anti- liberalism as vociferously and viciously as any NSDAP propa
ganda organ. Like the party ideologues noted above, they employ ad
hominem attacks in place of cogent analysis and prefer name- calling
to actual news.
Murdoch, Farah and their minions take street- fighting techniques
in front of minions through use of glossy modern technology.
Witness, for example, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh went on the
attacked Sen. Mary Landrieu (D- LA) for her stance on the healthcare
debate in the Senate. But they did not critique her position based
on its merits, and by offering a cogent counter- argument. Instead,
both called a female US senator a prostitute (The Rush Limbaugh
Show November 23 2009 and The Glenn Beck Program November 23,2009).
This sort of attack is commonplace and differs not at all from the
tactics used by the National Socialist Press in the 20’s and 30’s.
• Glenn Beck listed people he’d like to “beat to death with a
shovel.” In 2001, Beck enumerated the various people that he
“would want to kill with a shovel,” or “line up” and “shoot … in the
head,” including Rep. Charles Rangel (D- NY). (Glenn Beck Program,
3/ 9/ 01)
• The Republican Tea- Party mobs embrace this principle. Ideo
logical rhetoric backs it up: We see for example from Ann Coulter,
Vester: You say you’d rather not talk to liberals at all? Coulter:
I think a baseball bat is the most effective way these days. (FOX
News Channel, DaySide with Linda Vester, 10/ 6)
• “Would you kill someone for that?…I’m thinking about killing
Michael Moore…I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire some
body to do it,… No, I think I could. I think he could be looking me
in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out. Is
this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus — band — Do, and
I’ve lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say,
‘Yeah, I’d kill Michael Moore,’ and then I’d see the little band:
What Would Jesus Do? And then I’d realize, ‘Oh, you wouldn’t kill
Michael Moore. Or at least you wouldn’t choke him to death.’ And you
know, well, I’m not sure.” (Glenn Beck Program, 5/ 17/ 05)
• Beck, joking about poisoning Nancy Pelosi: “So, Speaker Pelosi,
I just wanted to — you gonna drink your wine? Are you blind? Do those
eyes not work? There you — I want you to drink it now. Drink it. Drink
it. Drink it… By the way, I put poison in your —” (Glenn Beck Pro
gram, 8/ 6/ 09)
• Bill O’Reilly, of people who criticize him, The Radio Factor,
September 27, 2007: “You know, look, if I could strangle these peo
ple and not go to hell and get executed, I would, but I can’t.”
• Bill O’Reilly — radio show, Sept. 14, 2005: “I just wish Katrina
had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else, just had
flooded them out, and I wouldn’t have rescued them.”
• Rush Limbaugh October 20, 2009, The Rush Limbaugh Show: “This
guy from The New York Times, if he really thinks that humanity is
destroying the planet, humanity is destroying the climate, that
human beings in their natural existence are going to cause the
extinction of life on Earth — Andrew Revkin. Mr. Revkin, why don’t
you just go kill yourself and help the planet by dying?”
• Right Wing blogger Roger Erickson March 31, 2009: “At what point
do the people tell the politicians to go to hell? At what point do
they get off the couch, march down to their state legislator’s house,
pull him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp for being an idiot?”
Part 2: Liberal/Jewish Media and Right Wing Propaganda. This is the
second installment of a detailed examination of the parallels between
the Nazi movement in Germany and the new Republican methodology since
the election of Obama. Also see parts 1, 3, 4, and 5.
Now that we’ve examined the street-level thuggery in Part One, let’s
look at some examples of how the Republican “elite” work.
NSDAP and GOP: Two Medias; One Tactic
Everyone is familiar by now with the Right-wing rhetoric concerning
the “liberal media elite.” Personal responsibility goes right out the
window if you can just blame the other guy for lying about you. Again
we see a striking similarity between the National Socialists and the
Republicans – fix blame, and then accuse them of controlling the
media. The two seem to go hand-in-hand.
“Barack Obama only won because the media favored him and unfairly
denigrated the abilities and accomplishments of John McCain and Sarah
Palin.” We’ve heard this before, of course. It probably won’t surprise
you to know where:
Hitler, July 5, 1942, “New agencies all the world over…are for the
most part in the hands of Jews.”1
If you substitute “liberal” for “Jew” you have the same language.
Again, the liberals, like the Jews, are guilty of “fabrications”:
Sarah Palin, June 3, 2009, Anchorage: Palin spoke of “the entrenched
bureaucrats and the elite self-proclaimed intellectuals, and the smug
lobbyists who dominate Washington, and the liberal media that is
imposing its will on Washington, embracing that status quo, that
business as usual…” 2
This is the same language Hitler used of the “Jewish intellectuals”
and communists who dominated Weimar government. As an aside, she was
displaying typical intellectual dishonesty by lifting much of her
speech from “an article written four years ago by Newt Gingrich and
Craig Shirley without attribution.”3
The Conservapedia echoes Hitler: “The Liberal media elite is the
clique of highly paid, left-leaning executives and journalists who
directly control most output of the main newspapers and broadcasting
organizations.”4
The media is in the hands of the Jews (communists)! The media is in
the hands of the liberals (communists)! I don’t have to make this
stuff up. This is like shooting ducks in a pond or fishing with a hand
grenade.
If that is not enough, surely you remember the Nazi (mis)use of the
press. The National Socialist media became an outlet not for news, but
for propaganda. There is the most famous newspaper owner of all,
Joseph Goebbels and his paper Der Angriff (The Attack – aptly named).
Then there is the Völkischer Beobachter (Folkish [Ethnic] Observer)
edited first by Dietrich Eckart, an infamous “Jew-baiter”, then by
crank-ideologist Alfred Rosenberg.
Today, media has moved on to television and the Internet. Instead of
Der Angriff and the Völkischer Beobachter we have FOX News and World
Net Daily. Instead of Joseph Goebbels and Alfred Rosenberg we have
Rupert Murdoch and Joseph Farah. These media outlets spout anti-
liberalism as vociferously and viciously as any NSDAP propaganda
organ. Like the party ideologues noted above, they employ ad hominem
attacks in place of cogent analysis and prefer name-calling to actual
news.
Murdoch, Farah and their minions take street-fighting techniques in
front of minions through use of glossy modern technology.
Witness, for example, Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh went on the
attacked Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-LA) for her stance on the healthcare
debate in the Senate. But they did not critique her position based on
its merits, and by offering a cogent counter-argument. Instead, both
called a female US senator a prostitute (The Rush Limbaugh Show
November 23 2009 and The Glenn Beck Program November 23,2009).
This sort of attack is commonplace and differs not at all from the
tactics used by the National Socialist Press in the 20’s and 30’s.
Vilification is the order of the day. Analysis of the facts, when it
takes place at all, comes in a distant second. As Media Matters for
America reports,
Under its president, Roger Ailes, Fox News routinely employs racially
charged appeals to foment opposition to the Obama administration and
other progressive figures, such as Glenn Beck’s comments that
President Obama is a “racist” and “has a deep-seated hatred for white
people or the white culture.” Before launching the Fox News Channel,
Ailes worked as a media consultant for several Republican campaigns
where evidence shows he similarly appealed to racial fears and biases
for political gain, and as executive producer for Rush Limbaugh’s
television show, during which Limbaugh made several controversial
statements.5
And of course, just as National Socialist ideologues and leaders
motivated the mob, so do Republican ideologues. As I noted above,
Republican objections are not generally issued as cogent and well-
thought-out rebuttals of liberal positions but as ad hominem attacks,
character assassinations, and even suggested violence. This is true
not only of the rank-and-file but of the leadership, the party
ideologues, as can be seen from the examples below.
• Glenn Beck listed people he’d like to “beat to death with a
shovel.” In 2001, Beck enumerated the various people that he “would
want to kill with a shovel,” or “line up” and “shoot … in the head,”
including Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY). (Glenn Beck Program, 3/9/01)
• The Republican Tea-Party mobs embrace this principle. Ideological
rhetoric backs it up: We see for example from Ann Coulter, Vester: You
say you’d rather not talk to liberals at all? Coulter: I think a
baseball bat is the most effective way these days. (FOX News Channel,
DaySide with Linda Vester, 10/6)
• “Would you kill someone for that?…I’m thinking about killing
Michael Moore…I could kill him myself, or if I would need to hire
somebody to do it,… No, I think I could. I think he could be looking
me in the eye, you know, and I could just be choking the life out. Is
this wrong? I stopped wearing my What Would Jesus — band — Do, and
I’ve lost all sense of right and wrong now. I used to be able to say,
‘Yeah, I’d kill Michael Moore,’ and then I’d see the little band: What
Would Jesus Do? And then I’d realize, ‘Oh, you wouldn’t kill Michael
Moore. Or at least you wouldn’t choke him to death.’ And you know,
well, I’m not sure.” (Glenn Beck Program, 5/17/05)
• Beck, joking about poisoning Nancy Pelosi: “So, Speaker Pelosi, I
just wanted to — you gonna drink your wine? Are you blind? Do those
eyes not work? There you — I want you to drink it now. Drink it. Drink
it. Drink it… By the way, I put poison in your —”
(Glenn Beck Program,
8/6/09)
• Bill O’Reilly, of people who criticize him, The Radio Factor,
September 27, 2007: “You know, look, if I could strangle these people
and not go to hell and get executed, I would, but I can’t.”
• Bill O’Reilly - radio show, Sept. 14, 2005: “I just wish Katrina
had only hit the United Nations building, nothing else, just had
flooded them out, and I wouldn’t have rescued them.”
• Rush Limbaugh October 20, 2009, The Rush Limbaugh Show: “This guy
from The New York Times, if he really thinks that humanity is
destroying the planet, humanity is destroying the climate, that human
beings in their natural existence are going to cause the extinction of
life on Earth — Andrew Revkin. Mr. Revkin, why don’t you just go kill
yourself and help the planet by dying?”
• Right Wing blogger Roger Erickson March 31, 2009: “At what point do
the people tell the politicians to go to hell? At what point do they
get off the couch, march down to their state legislator’s house, pull
him outside, and beat him to a bloody pulp for being an idiot?”
Sources:
1Adolf Hitler, Hitler’s Table Talk 1941-1944 tr. By Norman Cameron and
R.H. Stevens (New York 2000 [1953]), 561.
2The Conservative Book Service even has this offering: Matthew
Continetti , The Persecution of Sarah Palin: How the Elite Media Tried
to Bring Down a Rising Star (2009) which makes the case that, “Palin
was a strong and popular conservative with traditional values-work,
family, and religion-and Washington Democrats and their allies in the
so-called mainstream media decided she had to be destroyed. These
elite liberals attacked everything from Palin’s clothing to her
parenting style to her church. They spread one malicious and untrue
rumor after another…”
3Huffington Post, June 6, 2009
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/geoffrey-dunn/palin-plagiarizes-gingric_b_212228.html
4Consevapedia, http://www.conservapedia.com/Liberal_media_elite
5Media Matters for America http://mediamatters.org/research/200910270001
6Fox News, Your World with Neal Cavuto, November 11, 2009.
7The Rush Limbaugh Show, April 1, 2005.
8Glenn Beck Program, April 27, 2006.
9The O’Reilly Factor, May 29, 2007.
10Hitler’s Table Talk, 47.
RHF
- the GOP, its not fascism when we do it:)Back to the ‘30s:how the GOP
- uses Nazi techniques to rally the mob:New agencies all the world
over
- are for the most part in the hands of Jews:If you substitute liberal
- for jew you have the same language
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The Jews and Blame Them
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The GOP and call them NAZIs
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for Conservatives and call them Fascist
Nn Ua - preach, Preach. PREACH That Hate !
peace and love ~ RHF
.
> ...
>
> read more »
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The Jews and Blame Them
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The GOP and call them NAZIs
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for Conservatives and call them Fascist
Nn Ua - preach, Preach. PREACH That Hate !
peace and love ~ RHF
.
Nickname unavailable
YOU TOOK A PAGE RIGHT OUT OF HITLERS HAND
BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Re: (OT) : 'Nickname Unavailable' Another Preacher of Hate . . ."
RHF
> ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
- YOU TOOK A PAGE RIGHT OUT OF HITLERS HAND
- BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Odd that Quoting "Hitler" {Idolizing} seems
to be your thing : While decrying Fascism
and the NAZIs and railing against 'The Jews'
- "Re: (OT) : 'Nickname Unavailable' Another Preacher of Hate . . ."
-
- "And of course, just as National Socialist ideologues and leaders
- motivated the mob, so do Republican ideologues. As I noted above,
- Republican objections are not generally issued as cogent and well-
- thought-out rebuttals of liberal positions but as ad hominem
attacks,
- character assassinations, and even suggested violence. This is true
- not only of the rank-and-file but of the leadership"
'Nickname Unavailable' Another Preacher of Hate . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/fb9ef22e5b719128
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The Jews and Blame Them
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for The GOP and call them NAZIs
Nn Ua - Preach That Hate for Conservatives and call them Fascist
Nn Ua - preach, Preach. PREACH That Hate !
may the 'god' of us all heal you of your hate
peace and love ~ RHF
.
.
JC
Revealing Quotes From Israeli Prime Ministers On 9/11/2001, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was asked what the 9/11 attacks meant for US/Israeli relations, and Netanyahu replied: "It's good it's very, very good er well, it's not good, but it will generate immediate sympathy for our cause." Source of Netanyahu quote: New York Times, 9/11/2001  "Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves." ---Commander Menachem Begin speaking before a rally to recruit terrorist volunteers for his private army, the Irgun, in the winter of 1947/48 (later Israeli Prime Minister, 1977-1983)
"Israel may have the right to put others on trial, but
certainly no one has the right to put the Jewish people and the State of
Israel on trial." |
JC
JC
as one born among you, and thou shalt love him as thyself; for ye were
strangers in the land of Egypt: I [am] the LORD your God.
Nickname unavailable
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 22:34:39 -0700 (PDT), Nickname unavailable
>
> <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote:
> > ROTFLOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > YOU TOOK A PAGE RIGHT OUT OF HITLERS HAND
> >BOOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
hehehe
Topaz
The Jews Are Our Misfortune
By Dr. William Pierce
If you've been listening to many of my broadcasts you will know that
the issue I talk about most often is that of media control. In nearly
every broadcast I have pointed out that the people who control the
mass media of news and entertainment are able to manipulate the
opinions and attitudes of about 95 per cent of the population. I have
pointed out
that the media bosses do this manipulation deliberately and in
collusion with one another, taking advantage of the compelling need
most people have to conform their ideas and their behavior to a
perceived norm.
The media bosses use their control over the mass media of
entertainment -- and to a lesser extent over the news media -- to
create an artificial norm that is presented to the public through
television, motion pictures, advertising, and other media, and this
artificial norm is the one perceived as real by most of the public.
Through their control of public opinion the media bosses also control
the democratic political process and governmental policy in a way that
is advantageous to them and disadvantageous to the White public. And
these media bosses are overwhelmingly Jews.
That has been the message I have presented over and over again in many
of these broadcasts. I have talked about different facets of Jewish
media control and have presented different specifics, different
details, in various broadcasts. I've discussed a number of different
Hollywood films or television shows as specific examples of the way in
which the Jews use their media control to brainwash the public, to
promote
fashions and styles and behavior that are harmful to our people but
that advance the long-term schemes of the Jews to further dominate and
exploit our society.
(Some of this may be outdated today, but it still explains why things
are the way they are)
I've talked about specific Jews who control various segments of the
mass media, and I've pointed out specific instances of the destructive
way in which they use their control. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Sumner Redstone and his control of MTV and CBS and the
Hollywood film studio Paramount Pictures. I've talked about the Jewish
media boss Michael Eisner and his control of the Disney Company and
ABC. I've talked about the Jewish media boss Gerald Levin and his
control of Time Warner and CNN. I've talked about the Jewish media
boss Edgar Bronfman and his control of the largest segment of the
popular music industry and Universal Studios in Hollywood. And I've
talked about dozens of other Jewish media bosses and the media they
control and the specific ways in
which they use those media. In particular, during the past few months
I've talked about several recent Hollywood films which deliberately
target teenaged White girls and brainwash them with the notion that it
is fashionable for them to have sex with Black males.
And of course, I've talked about the Jewish control of the news media
as well as the entertainment media. In a way similar to their use of
the entertainment media to set popular fashions, the Jewish media
bosses distort and censor the news in order to give the public a
distorted picture of what is happening in the world. I've given
several very
specific examples of this Jewish management of the news in recent
months.
I've talked about the total blackout at the national level of the news
of the atrocious rape and massacre of Whites in Wichita, Kansas, by
Blacks last December, and I've talked about the almost total
suppression of the news of the Black racial attacks on Whites in
Seattle in the Mardi Gras riot at the end of February this year. I
also talked about
the downplaying of the racial aspects of the Black rioting in
Cincinnati in April of this year, about the failure of the news media
outside the immediate Cincinnati area to mention the deliberate
targeting of Whites, especially White women, by the Black rioters. And
I described the gross distortions in the news coverage of the racial
politics in York,
Pennsylvania, that led to the current White mayor of York being
charged in May with the killing of a Black during a Black race riot in
York 32 years ago.
I have pointed out repeatedly how all of this suppression of the news
and distortion of the news is aimed at creating and maintaining a
false picture in the public mind of racial conflict in the United
States. In this false picture Whites always are the aggressors, Blacks
or other non-Whites are the innocent victims, and the root of all
racial conflict
is White racism.
In a number of my broadcasts I've discussed at length why the Jews do
what they do: why they use their media control in such a deceptive and
destructive way, what their motives are. I've also talked about how
they collaborate. I've pointed out that their propaganda policies are
not formulated independently, but that they have a coherent party line
that
they all follow. I've given a number of specific examples of this.
Well, all of these things that I've talked about have not gone
unnoticed by the Jewish media bosses themselves. When people expose
their activities or their scheming they pay attention. In particular,
they have been paying attention to these American Dissident Voices
broadcasts and to the work of my organization, the National Alliance.
They read what's on our Web sites at natvan.com and natall.com and
resistance.com, and they talk about it among themselves. This shows up
pretty clearly in the uniform way in which their media respond to us.
Whether it's the Associated Press or Time magazine or the Washington
Post or a television news commentator anywhere in the United States,
they always use the same
phrasing in talking about us. They always use the word "hate" in
referring to us. They always say that the National Alliance is the
"most dangerous organized hate group" in America, despite the fact
that all we do is disseminate to the public the truth about what
they're doing. That's what they regard as "dangerous" and as "hate."
If you want to see a current indicator of the fact that they do think
about us, go to the Web site promoting Steven Spielberg's new
movie,A.I. There you'll see a parody of a part of the National
Alliance's Web site in the form of a page headed "Who Is the
Anti-Robot Militia?" It's obviously copied, almost word for word, from
the page "Who Is the National Alliance?" on our Web site. It's
difficult for me to understand what they hoped to accomplish with this
parody. Perhaps they believe that it will make people take us less
seriously.
Somewhat less quirky but much more directly deceptive are their
standard smokescreen responses. It used to be that whenever I would
raise the issue of Jewish monopoly control of the mass media of news
and entertainment during an interview or on a call-in program, I would
hear the response from a Jew or an apologist for the Jews: "What about
Ted
Turner? He's not a Jew," as if that negated everything I had said. Of
course, that response was used before Ted Turner's CNN was taken over
by the very Jewish Time Warner. And now that Ted Turner has been eased
out of all decision-making positions in the cable news network he
built and has been replaced by Jews, one doesn't hear the Ted Turner
response any longer.
The standard responses today, the ones I hear as often as I used to
hear the Ted Turner response, are the "it's the shareholders" and the
"it's the big bankers." Whenever I start naming names -- whenever I
begin talking about the control over the media wielded by Michael
Eisner or Sumner Redstone, for example, a Jew will pop up with the
response:
"Those guys don't control the media. It's the shareholders who control
the media. Eisner and Redstone are just employees. The shareholders
tell them what to do." A variation on this theme is, "Eisner and
Redstone don't own the media. It's the big banks that own all of the
media, and most of the big bankers are Gentiles."
Well, of course, that's not really true, and they know it's not true.
The big Jewish media bosses are mostly quite autonomous. Sumner
Redstone, for example, owns outright two-thirds of the shares in his
media empire. His personal fortune is more than 12 billion dollars,
according to Forbes magazine this month. I'm quite sure he doesn't
check
with any shareholders before he dreams up some new piece of
race-mixing filth for MTV.
As for Gentile bankers telling the Jewish media bosses what kind of
propaganda they must produce for the public, that's total nonsense. I
haven't yet done a study of the investment banking industry to
determine what percentage of Jews and what percentage of Gentiles are
involved in it, but one thing that's certain is that the Gentile
bankers would faint dead away at the thought of telling Jewish media
bosses such as Michael Eisner or the Sulzberger family or the
Newhouses or Sumner Redstone to cut back on the race-mixing
propaganda. Gentile bankers as a class are rich, deracinated capons,
whose only interest is money.
Every Jewish propaganda medium -- CBS or MTV or Time magazine or the
New York Times -- is staffed from top to bottom with Jews, and they
all know what they're doing. They work as a tribe, as a swarm of
termites gnawing at the foundations of our existence. There is total
agreement among the media Jews as to the general thrust of their
propaganda. They may disagree on many of the details -- they may even
compete against each other for a bigger slice of the media pie -- but
all agree on the general goals of degrading and subverting Gentile
civilization, of corrupting Gentile institutions, of mongrelizing our
race. Again, the Jews work as a tribe, and that is the source of their
strength and their success.
Gentile bankers, on the other hand, work only for themselves. They
would not dream of combining and using their financial strength to
protect our people from the Jews. They are terrified of the Jews, of
the media. The more money they have, the more selfish and the more
cowardly they are. The huge difference, the decisive difference,
between the Jews and our people is that they work as a tribe, and we
work as individuals. They
work together, rich Jews and poor Jews, for their common tribal
interests, against us, and until now we have failed to organize
effectively to defend ourselves against them.
Anyway, my point is that their defense against my exposure of their
activities and their power over our government is orchestrated - that
is, they've all gotten together and decided what their defense will be
-- and it's a deliberate lie. As I continue to expose the destructive
activities of the Jewish media bosses, you will continue to hear them
and their apologists respond that they really don't have any power,
that it's the Gentile shareholders and the Gentile bankers who control
the media. A lot of dimwits will believe that lie. A lot of couch
potatoes, a lot of soccer moms, a lot of baseball fans, a lot of
lemmings, will
believe that it's not the Jew Sumner Redstone who deliberately uses
MTV to corrupt White teenagers; instead it's some cabal of Gentile
shareholders and Gentile bankers who tell him what to do, and Redstone
is only an employee who follows their orders.
I think it's time for us to orchestrate our exposure of the Jewish
media. I think it's about time for the public, lemmings and all, to
begin hearing a uniform charge against them, a uniform statement of
our opposition to them. How about this: The Jews are our misfortune.
That's simple, and it's true, and it's easy to remember. Repeat after
me: The
Jews are our misfortune. Let's use that statement. Let's let everyone
hear it. Let's impress it on everyone's consciousness: The Jews are
our misfortune.
Of course, when I say the Jews are our misfortune, I'm not talking
only about the Jewish media bosses. I'm not talking only about the
Jews at the top, such as Sumner Redstone and the Sulzbergers and
Michael Eisner and the others who formulate and direct the propaganda
line against Gentile society; I'm talking about the whole tribe, and I
believe that message comes across in the statement, the Jews are our
misfortune. Let me tell you what the standard lemming response will be
to that statement, the response that they have been taught and will
parrot back.
First, from the religious lemmings it will be something like this:
"Oh, no, the Jews aren't our misfortune, we owe everything to the
Jews. Don't you know that Jesus was a Jew and God was his father? That
makes God a Jew. We must do what the Jews tell us. They are God's
people." I'm sure that argument is embarrassing to some of the more
sophisticated
apologists for the Jews, but many Christian Fundamentalists use it,
and I've heard it often.
From the secular lemmings it will be more like: "Don't you know that
Freud and Einstein and Salk were Jews? We wouldn't have a space
program if it weren't for Einstein. We wouldn't have a cure for polio
if it weren't for Salk. The Jews are our fortune, not our misfortune."
Well, of course, our space program has practically nothing to do with
Einstein or his Jewishness. Gentile thinkers envisioned it and
pioneered both its theoretical basis and its practical development.
The German theoretician, Hermann Oberth, and the Russian, Konstantin
Tsiolkovsky, were two of the Gentiles who independently demonstrated
mathematically the feasibility of space travel in the early years of
the last century. The American rocket pioneer Robert Goddard and the
German Wernher von Braun designed actual rockets and built the
vehicles which were the precursors of today's space ships. Jews didn't
become involved until it became glamorous and profitable. And the
development of a polio vaccine hardly would have missed a beat if
Jonas Salk had gone into the garment business instead of medicine. He
was one of a team, and he got the credit for the work of others as
well as for his own work.
The reasons we hear these silly and groundless claims in the first
place about how much we owe the Jews -- the reasons are Jewish media
control and Jewish tribalism, Jewish support for their own. Freud was
given the enormous buildup he received for his theorizing about anal
personalities and penis envy and the like because he was a Jew, not
because of any genuine merit in his theorizing. Other Jewish writers
recognized him as one of their own and propelled him to a position of
undeserved authority, and his theories ultimately did an enormous
amount of damage to the development of our understanding of psychology
and mental disease. Einstein was a competent mathematical physicist,
but a great deal of the publicity he received was based on the fact
that he was a Jew rather than on the merits of his work. As in the
case of Salk, Jewish publicists gave Einstein credit for the work of
others as well as for his own work.
What we must do is look at the balance sheet. Is the damage done to
our race by Karl Marx and all of his Jewish followers in the communist
movement -- the selective murder of more than 30 million of the best
of our people in Europe during the past century -- offset by whatever
contributions Einstein and Salk and other Jews have made -- even if
they did everything their Jewish boosters claim for them? Certainly,
there have been many other Jews who were competent and creative
engineers and scientists besides Einstein and Salk. Not every clever
Jew became a lawyer or a scriptwriter or a pawn shop owner or a
middleman. Some became chemists or mathematicians or physicists. But
can all of them together make up for the mass murders Lazar Kaganovich
perpetrated
aginst the Ukrainians, for the rapes and murders of German civilians
instigated by Ilya Ehrenburg, for the Eastern European girls still
being forced into sexual slavery on a huge scale today by Israeli
slave dealers?
I think not. And I have not yet put on the balance sheet what the
Jewish masters of America's mass media have done and are doing to us.
What can possibly compensate White Americans for the deliberate,
malevolent corruption of our young people by just one Jewish gangster
like Sumner Redstone and his MTV? The race-mixing, culture-destroying,
hip-hop filth churned out by Sumner Redstone's MTV seven days a week
is the single most destructive influence in American life today. And
of course, Redstone doesn't produce this filth all by himself. He has
thousands of Jews working for him at every level, not only in MTV but
also in CBS and in Paramount Pictures and in all of his other media
properties.
And although MTV, targeting White teenagers as it does, may seem the
most blatantly and maliciously destructive of the Jewish media, it is
hardly much worse than some of the filth being poured into the minds
of the American public by Michael Eisner's Disney empire: especially
by its Miramax films division under the Weinstein brothers. The fact
that much of the entertainment produced by Eisner's Disney Company is
relatively nnocuous does not compensate for the fact that some of it
is pure poison. The poison is being introduced gradually, more and
more each year, and it is having its effect. When the Disney Company
was entirely a Gentile company a few years ago, its output of
ntertainment may sometimes have been excessively bland, but none of it
was poison designed to corrupt White Americans.
And what can possibly compensate on our balance sheet for what the
Jewish news media are doing in their deliberate, calculated distortion
of the picture of the world seen by the American public. It is a
picture which has been designed to confuse White Americans, to
undermine their self-confidence, to induce feelings of racial guilt in
them. Just one example: the systematic suppression of the news of
Black crimes against White people and the exaggeration of the news of
every White crime against non-Whites is not a fluke. It is done
routinely by all of the Jewish news media: by the New York Times, by
the Washington Post, by Time magazine and Newsweek magazine, by CNN
and ABC News and CBS News and NBC News and all the rest. And
interracial crime is just one issue. The relations between the sexes;
immigration; the foreign relations of the United States with the rest
of the world, especially in the Middle East; and a hundred other
important issues are similarly distorted in their portrayal by the
media. This deliberate distortion of the public's view of the world
has done irreparable damage to the American system of government and
to American society. And again: the distortion has been deliberate,
planned, systematic, and intended to do harm to us. No number of funny
Jewish comedians, or successful Jewish entrepreneurs in Silicon Valley
or on Wall Street, or clever Jewish medical researchers can compensate
for this harm.
When we look at the balance sheet the conclusion is clear beyond any
doubt: the Jews are our misfortune. It's way past time for us to
accept this conclusion, to overcome our fears of being labeled
"anti-Semitic" for accepting this conclusion, to brush aside these
fears which have been instilled in us by the propaganda of the mass
media, and then to begin working to improve our fortunes.
Topaz
Topaz
The Old Testament does say that God likes one race of people more than
others. It calls this race the Israelites. Nature wants the most
advanced and evolved race to take over. This is obviously the White
race. Compare Europe to Africa.
This is the definition of the word "adam" in Strong's Concordance:
"to show blood (in the face), i.e. flush or turn rosy:- be
(dyed, made) red (ruddy)."
This can only be describing a White man. Look at people today
and see which ones have rosy red cheeks. They are light skinned White
people.
The Bible says David was ruddy. This is the definition of the
Hebrew word "ruddy":
"reddish (of the hair or of the complexion):-red, ruddy."
David had rosy cheeks (or red hair) and did not look like a
typical Jew.
The original Israelites were White people.
Jews are like the American Indians of today. These people say they
are Indians but the original Indians were clearly described as having
red skin. Today Indians may look brown or white, but not red. Neither
are Jews like the original Israelites.
The religious leaders of the Jews were the Pharisees. Jesus
condemned them in the harshest words.
Matthew 23:33 "Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye
escape the damnation of hell?"
The New Jewish Encyclopedia, edited by David Bridger, PH.D in
association with Samual Wolk, Rabbi, J.S.D, copyright 1962, Published
by Behrman House, inc.,1261 Broadway, New York 1, N.Y., Library of
Congress Catalog Card Number: 62-17079, says on page 376:
"The Pharisees are therefore regarded as those authorities who helped
develop and preserve traditional Judaism as it is known today."
The old drawing of Jesus were probably correct. He probably had blond
hair and blue eyes.
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."
Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sensible and truthful portions retained, below.
<FLUSSHHhh封封封 asinine Anti-Semitic SWILL!!!!!>
Awww. Too bad. Nothing left. Except for
the one who posted the above, now-disposed-of
swill =>=
\/
======
\/
\/
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | |
/ O O\ | "Dawk." |
/ \ | |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c___"Topaz"____
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sensible and truthful portions retained, below.
<FLUSSHHhh封封封 asinine Anti-Semitic SWILL!!!!!>
Awww. Too bad. Nothing left. Except for
the one who posted the above, now-disposed-of
swill =>=
\/
======
\/
\/
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | |
/ O O\ | "Dawk." |
/ \ | |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c___"Topaz"____
Topaz
http://www.csulb.edu/~kmacd/review-AR.html
Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique
Reviewed by Stanley Hornbeck
In The Culture of Critique, Kevin MacDonald advances a carefully
researched but extremely controversial thesis: that certain 20th
century intellectual movements -- largely established and led by Jews
-- have changed European societies in fundamental ways and destroyed
the confidence of Western man. He claims that these movements were
designed, consciously or unconsciously, to advance Jewish interests
even though they were presented to non-Jews as universalistic and even
utopian. He concludes that the increasing dominance of these ideas has
had profound political and social consequences that benefited Jews but
caused great harm to gentile societies. This analysis, which he makes
with considerable force, is an unusual indictment of a people
generally thought to be more sinned against than sinning.
The Culture of Critique is the final title in Prof. MacDonald's
massive, three-volume study of Jews and their role in history. The two
previous volumes are A People That Shall Dwell Alone and Separation
and its Discontents, published by Praeger in 1994 and 1998. The series
is written from a sociobiological perspective that views Judaism as a
unique survival strategy that helps Jews compete with other ethnic
groups. Prof. MacDonald, who is a psychologist at the University of
California at Long Beach, explains this perspective in the first
volume, which describes Jews as having a very powerful sense of
uniqueness that has kept them socially and genetically separate from
other peoples. The second volume traces the history of Jewish-gentile
relations, and finds the causes of anti-Semitism primarily in the
almost invariable commercial and intellectual dominance of gentile
societies by Jews and in their refusal to assimilate. The Culture of
Critique brings his analysis into the present century, with an account
of the Jewish role in the radical critique of traditional culture.
The intellectual movements Prof. MacDonald discusses in this volume
are Marxism, Freudian psychoanalysis, the Frankfurt school of
sociology, and Boasian anthropology. Perhaps most relevant from a
racial perspective, he also traces the role of Jews in promoting
multi-culturalism and Third World immigration. Throughout his analysis
Prof. MacDonald reiterates his view that Jews have promoted these
movements as Jews and in the interests of Jews, though they have often
tried to give the impression that they had no distinctive interests of
their own. Therefore Prof. MacDonald's most profound charge against
Jews is not ethnocentrism but dishonesty -- that while claiming to be
working for the good of mankind they have often worked for their own
good and to the detriment of others. While attempting to promote the
brotherhood of man by dissolving the ethnic identification of
gentiles, Jews have maintained precisely the kind of intense group
solidarity they decry as immoral in others.
Celebrating Diversity
Prof. MacDonald claims that one of the most consistent ways in which
Jews have advanced their interests has been to promote pluralism and
diversity -- but only for others. Ever since the 19th century, they
have led movements that tried to discredit the traditional foundations
of gentile society: patriotism, racial loyalty, the Christian basis
for morality, social homogeneity, and sexual restraint. At the same
time, within their own communities, and with regard to the state of
Israel, they have often supported the very institutions they attack in
gentile society.
Why is this in the interests of Jews? Because the parochial group
loyalty characteristic of Jews attracts far less attention in a
society that does not have a cohesive racial and cultural core. The
Jewish determination not to assimilate fully, which accounts for their
survival as a people for thousands for years -- even without a country
-- has invariably attracted unpleasant and even murderous scrutiny in
nations with well -defined national identities. In Prof. MacDonald's
view it is therefore in the interest of Jews to dilute and weaken the
identity of any people among whom they live. Jewish identity can
flower in safety only when gentile identity is weak.
Prof. MacDonald quotes a remarkable passage from Charles Silberman:
"American Jews are committed to cultural tolerance because of their
belief -- one firmly rooted in history -- that Jews are safe only in a
society acceptant of a wide range of attitudes and behaviors, as well
as a diversity of religious and ethnic groups. It is this belief, for
example, not approval of homosexuality, that leads an overwhelming
majority of American Jews to endorse 'gay rights' and to take a
liberal stance on most other so-called 'social' issues."
He is saying, in effect, that when Jews make the
diversity-is-our-strength argument it is in support of their real goal
of diluting a society's homogeneity so that Jews will feel safe. They
are couching a Jewish agenda in terms they think gentiles will accept.
Likewise, as the second part of the Silberman quotation suggests, Jews
may support deviant movements, not because they think it is good for
the country but because it is good for the Jews.
Prof. Silberman also provides an illuminating quote from a Jewish
economist who thought that republicans had more sensible economic
policies but who voted for the Democratic presidential candidate
anyway. His reason? "I'd rather live in a country governed by the
faces I saw at the Democratic convention than those I saw at the
Republican convention." This man apparently distrusts white gentiles
and voted for a racially mixed party even if its economic policies
were wrong. What is good for Jews appears to come before what is good
for the country.
Earl Raab, former president of heavily Jewish Brandeis University
makes the diversity argument in a slightly different way. Expressing
his satisfaction with the prediction that by the middle of the next
century whites will become a minority, he writes, "We have tipped
beyond the point where a Nazi-Aryan party will be able to prevail in
this country." He is apparently prepared to displace the people and
culture of the founding stock in order to prevent the theoretical rise
of an anti-Jewish regime. Prof. Raab appears to see whites mainly as
potential Nazis, and is willing to sacrifice their culture and
national continuity in order to defuse an imagined threat to Jews.
This passage takes for granted the continued future existence of Jews
as a distinct community even as gentile whites decline in numbers and
influence.
In the same passage, Prof. Raab continues by noting that, "[w]e [Jews]
have been nourishing the American climate of opposition to bigotry for
about half a century. That climate has not yet been perfected, but the
heterogeneous nature of our population tends to make it
irreversible..." -- just as it tends to make the ultimate displacement
of European culture also irreversible.
Prof. MacDonald traces the development of this diversity strategy to
several sources. It is widely recognized that the German-Jewish
immigrant Franz Boas (1858-1942) almost single-handedly established
the current contours of anthropology, ridding it of all biological
explanations for differences in human culture or behavior. Prof.
MacDonald reports that he and his followers -- with the notable
exceptions of Margaret Mead and Ruth Benedict -- were all Jews with
strong Jewish identities: "Jewish identification and the pursuit of
perceived Jewish interests, particularly in advocating an ideology of
cultural pluralism as a model for Western societies, has been the
'invisible subject' of American anthropology."
By 1915, Boas and his students controlled the American Anthropological
Association and by 1926 they headed every major American university
anthropology department. From this position of dominance they promoted
the idea that race and biology are trivial matters, and that
environment counts for everything. They completely recast anthropology
so as to provide intellectual support for open immigration,
integration, and miscegenation. They also laid the foundation for the
idea that because all races have the same potential, the failures of
non-whites must be blamed exclusively on white oppression. The
ultimate conclusion of Boasian anthropology was that since environment
accounts for all human differences, every inequality in achievement
can be eliminated by changing the environment. This has been the
justification for enormous and wasteful government intervention
programs.
The entire "civil rights" movement can be seen as a natural
consequence of the triumph of Boasian thinking. Since all races were
equivalent, separation was immoral. The color line also sharpened
white self-consciousness in ways that might make whites more aware of
Jewish parochialism. Thus it was, according to Prof. MacDonald, that
Jews almost single-handedly launched the desegregation movement.
Without the leadership of Jews, the NAACP might never have been
established, and until 1975 every one of its presidents was a Jew.
Prof. MacDonald reports that in 1917, when the black separatist Marcus
Garvey visited NAACP headquarters, he saw so many white faces that he
stormed out, complaining that it was a white organization.
Prof. MacDonald concludes that the efforts of Jews were crucial to the
"civil rights" transformation of America. He quotes a lawyer for the
American Jewish Congress who claims that "many of these [civil rights]
laws were actually written in the offices of Jewish agencies by Jewish
staff people, introduced by Jewish legislators and pressured into
being by Jewish voters."
While the Boas school was promoting integration and racial
equivalence, it was also critical of, in Prof. MacDonald's words,
"American culture as overly homogeneous, hypocritical, emotionally and
aesthetically repressive (especially with regard to sexuality).
Central to this program was creating ethnographies of idyllic
[Third-World] cultures that were free of the negatively perceived
traits that were attributed to Western culture."
The Role of the anthropologist became one of criticizing everything
about Western society while glorifying everything primitive. Prof.
MacDonald notes that Boasian portrayals of non-Western peoples
deliberately ignored barbarism and cruelty or simply attributed it to
contamination from the West. He sees this as a deliberate attempt to
undermine the confidence of Western societies and to make them
permeable to Third World influences and people. Today, this view is
enshrined in the dogma that America must remain open to immigration
because immigrants bring spirit and energy that natives somehow lack.
Authoritarian Personalities
In order to open European-derived societies to the immigration that
would transform them, it was necessary to discredit racial solidarity
and commitment to tradition. Prof. MacDonald argues that this was the
basic purpose of a group of intellectuals known as the Frankfurt
School. What is properly known as the Institute of Social Research was
founded in Frankfurt, Germany, during the Weimar period by a Jewish
millionaire but was closed down by the Nazis shortly after they took
power. Most of its staff emigrated to the United States and the
institute reconstituted itself at UC Berkeley. The organization was
headed by Max Horkheimer, and its most influential members were T.W.
Adorno, Erich Fromm, and Herbert Marcuse, all of whom had strong
Jewish identities. Horkheimer made no secret of the partisan nature of
the institute's activities: "Research would be able here to transform
itself directly into propaganda," he wrote. (Italics in the original)
Prof. MacDonald devotes many pages to an analysis of The Authoritarian
Personality, which was written by Adorno and appeared in 1950. It was
part of a series called Studies in Prejudice, produced by the
Frankfurt school, which included titles like Anti-Semitism and
Emotional Disorder. The Authoritarian Personality, which was
particularly influential because, according to Prof. MacDonald, the
American Jewish Committee heavily funded its promotion and because
Jewish academics took up its message so enthusiastically.
The book's purpose is to make every group affiliation sound as if it
were a sign of mental disorder. Everything from patriotism to religion
to family -- and race -- loyalty are sign of a dangerous and defective
"authoritarian personality." Because drawing distinctions between
different groups is illegitimate, all group loyalties -- even close
family ties! -- are "prejudice." As Christopher Lasch has written, the
book leads to the conclusion that prejudice "could be eradicated only
by subjecting the American people to what amounted to collective
psychotherapy -- by treating them as inmates of an insane asylum."
But according to Prof. MacDonald it is precisely the kind of group
loyalty, respect for tradition, and consciousness of differences
central to Jewish identity that Horkheimer and Adorno described as
mental illness in gentiles. These writers adopted what eventually
became a favorite Soviet tactic against dissidents: Anyone whose
political views were different from theirs was insane. As Prof.
MacDonald explains, the Frankfurt school never criticized or even
described Jewish group identity -- only that of gentiles: "behavior
that is critical to Judaism as a successful group evolutionary
strategy is conceptualized as pathological in gentiles."
For these Jewish intellectuals, anti-Semitism was also a sign of
mental illness: They concluded that Christian self-denial and
especially sexual repression caused hatred of Jews. The Frankfurt
school was enthusiastic about psycho-analysis, according to which
"Oedipal ambivalence toward the father and anal-sadistic relations in
early childhood are the anti-Semite's irrevocable inheritance."
In addition to ridiculing patriotism and racial identity, the
Frankfurt school glorified promiscuity and Bohemian poverty. Prof.
MacDonald sees the school as a seminal influence: "Certainly many of
the central attitudes of the largely successful 1960s countercultural
revolution find expression in The Authoritarian Personality, including
idealizing rebellion against parents, low-investment sexual
relationships, and scorn for upward social mobility, social status,
family pride, the Christian religion, and patriotism."
Of the interest here, however, is the movement's success in branding
ancient loyalties to nation and race as mental illnesses. Although he
came later, the French-Jewish "deconstructionist" Jacques Derrida was
in the same tradition when he wrote:
"The idea behind deconstruction is to deconstruct the workings of
strong nation-states with powerful immigration policies, to
deconstruct the rhetoric of nationalism, the politics of place, the
metaphysics of native land and native tongue... The idea is to disarm
the bombs... of identity that nation-states build to defend themselves
against the stranger, against Jews and Arabs and immigrants... "
As Prof. MacDonald puts it, "Viewed at its most abstract level, a
fundamental agenda is thus to influence the European-derived peoples
of the United States to view concern about their own demographic and
cultural eclipse as irrational and as an indication of
psychopathology." Needless to say, this project has been successful;
anyone opposed to the displacement of whites is routinely treated as a
mentally unhinged "hate-monger," and whenever whites defend their
group interests they are described as psychologically inadequate. The
irony has not escaped Prof. MacDonald: "The ideology that
ethnocentrism was a form of psychopathology was promulgated by a group
that over its long history had arguably been the most ethnocentric
group among all the cultures of the world."
Immigration
Prof. MacDonald argues that it is entirely natural for Jews to promote
open immigration. It brings about the "diversity" Jews find comforting
and it keeps America open to persecuted co-religionists throughout the
world. He says Jews are the only group that has always fought for mass
immigration; a few European ethnic organizations have made sporadic
efforts to make it easier for their own people to come, but only Jews
have consistently promoted open borders for all comers. Moreover,
whatever disagreements they may have had on other issues, Jews of
every political persuasion have favored high immigration.
This, too, goes back many years, and Prof. MacDonald traces in
considerable detail the sustained Jewish pro-immigration effort.
Israel Zangwill, author of the eponymous 1908 play The Melting Pot,
was of the view that "there is only one way to World Peace, and that
is the absolute abolition of passports, visas, frontiers, custom
houses... " He was nevertheless an ardent Zionist and disapproved of
Jewish intermarriage.
Although the statue of liberty, properly known as Liberty Enlightening
the World, was a gift to the United States from France as a tribute to
American political traditions, the sonnet by the Jewish Emma Lazarus
helped change it into a symbol of immigration. Affixed to the base of
the statue several decades after its construction, the poem welcomes
to America "huddled masses yearning to breath free/The wretched refuse
of your teeming shore."
Prof. MacDonald has discovered that implausible arguments about
diversity being a quintessentially American strength have been made by
Jews for a long time. He reports that in 1948 the American Jewish
Committee was urging Congress to believe that "Americanism is the
spirit behind the welcome that America has traditionally extended to
people of all races, all religions, all nationalities." Of course,
there had never been such a tradition. In 1952, the American Jewish
Congress argued in hearings on immigration that "our national
experience has confirmed beyond a doubt that our very strength lies in
the diversity of our peoples." This, too, was at a time when U.S.
immigration law was still explicitly designed to maintain a white
majority.
It is often said that when the old immigration policy was scrapped in
1965, scarcely anyone knew, and no one predicted, that the new law
would change the racial makeup of the country. Prof. MacDonald
disputes this, arguing that this had been the objective of Jewish
groups from the beginning.
Prof. MacDonald finds that Jews have been the foremost advocates of
immigration in England, France, and Canada, and that Jewish groups
were the most vocal opponents of independence for Quebec. Australian
Jews led the effort to dismantle the "white Australia" policy, one
reason for which was cited in an editorial in the Australian Jewish
Democrat: "The strengthening of multi-cultural or diverse Australia is
also our most effective insurance policy against anti-Semitism. The
day Australia has a Chinese Australian Governor General I would feel
more confident of my freedom to live as a Jewish Australian." Like
Earl Raab writing about the United States, this Australian Jew is
prepared to sacrifice the traditional culture, people, and identity of
Australia to specifically Jewish interests. It would not be surprising
if such an openly expressed objective did not have the opposite effect
from the intended, and increase anti-Jewish sentiment.
Jews and the Left
It is well known that Jews have been traditionally associated with the
left, and Prof. MacDonald investigates this connection in some detail.
Historically it was understandable that Jews should support movements
that advocated overthrowing the existing order. After emancipation,
Jews met resistance from gentile elites who did not want to lose
ground to competitors, and outsiders easily become revolutionaries.
However, in Prof. MacDonald's view, Jewish commitment to leftist
causes has often been motivated by the hope that communism,
especially, would be a tool for combating anti-Semitism, and by
expectation that universalist social solutions would be yet another
way to dissolve gentile loyalties that might exclude Jews. The appeal
of univeralist ideologies is tied to the implicit understanding that
Jewish particularism will be exempt:
"At the extreme, acceptance of a universalist ideology by gentiles
would result in gentiles not perceiving Jews as in a different social
category at all, while nonetheless Jews would be able to maintain a
strong personal identity as Jews."
Prof. MacDonald argues that Jews had specifically Jewish reasons for
supporting the Bolshevik revolution. Czarist Russia was notorious for
its anti-Semitic policies and, during its early years, the Soviet
Union seemed to be the promised land for Jews: it ended state
anti-Semitism, tried to eradicate Christianity, opened opportunities
to individual Jews, and preached a "classless" society in which
Jewishness would presumably attract no negative attention. Moreover,
since Marxism taught that all conflict was economic rather than
ethnic, many Jews believed it heralded the end of anti-Semitism.
Prof. MacDonald emphasizes that although Jewish Communists preached
both atheism and the solidarity of the world's working people, they
took pains to preserve a distinct, secular Jewish identity. He reports
that Lenin himself (who had one Jewish grandparent) approved the
continuation of an explicitly Jewish identity under Communism, and in
1946 the Communist Party of the United States voted a resolution also
supporting Jewish peoplehood in Communist countries. Thus, although
Communism was supposed to be without borders or religion, Jews were
confident that it would make a place for their own group identity. He
writes that despite the official view that all men were to be
brothers, "very few Jews lost their Jewish identity during the entire
soviet era."
Jewish Communists sometimes betrayed remarkable particularism. Prof.
MacDonald quotes Charles Pappoport, the French Communist leader: "The
Jewish people [are] the bearer of all the great ideas of unity and
human community in history... The disappearance of the Jewish people
would signify the death of humankind, the final transformation of man
into a wild beast." This seems to attribute to Jews an elite position
incompatible with "unity and human community."
Prof. MacDonald argues that many Jews began to fall away from
Communism only after Stalin showed himself to be anti-Semitic. And
just as Jews had been the leading revolutionaries in anti-Semitic
pre-Revolutionary Russia, Jews became the leading dissidents in an
anti-Semitic Soviet Union. A similar pattern can be found in the
imposed Communist governments of Eastern Europe, which were largely
dominated by Jews. The majority of the leaders of the Polish Communist
Party, for example, spoke better Yiddish than Polish, and they too
maintained a strong Jewish identity. After the fall of Communism many
stopped being Polish and emigrated to Israel.
Prof. MacDonald writes that in Bela Kun's short-lived 1919 Communist
government of Hungary, 95 percent of the leaders were Jews, and that
at the time of the 1956 uprising Communism was so closely associated
with Jews that the rioting had almost the flavor of a pogrom. He
argues that in the United States as well, the hard core among
Communists and members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) was
mainly Jewish. Here, too, a revolutionary, atheist, and universalist
world-view was fully compatible with strong identification as Jews.
Prof. MacDonald quotes from a study of American leftists:
"Many Communists, for example, state that they could never have
married a spouse who was not a leftist. When Jews were asked if they
could have married Gentiles, many hesitated, surprised by the
question, and found it difficult to answer. Upon reflection, many
concluded that they had always taken marriage to someone Jewish for
granted." Their commitment as Jews was even more fundamental and
unexamined than their commitment to the left.
Prof. MacDonald reports that many American Jews also abandoned
Communism as it became increasingly anti-Semitic. For a large number,
the Soviet Union's severing of diplomatic ties with Israel during the
1967 war was the last straw. A former SDS activist no doubt spoke for
many when he explained, "If I must choose between the Jewish cause and
a 'progressive' anti-Israel SDS, I shall choose the Jewish cause. If
barricades are erected, I will fight as a Jew." According to Prof.
MacDonald, American neoconservatism can also be described as a surface
shift in external politics that leaves the more fundamental commitment
to Jewish identity unchanged. Thus, former leftists abandoned an
ideology that had turned against Israel and refashioned American
conservatism into a different movement, the one unshakable theme of
which was support for Israel. Neoconservatives also support high
levels of immigration and were active in excluding white racial
identification from the "respectable" right.
Objections
There are many possible objections to Prof. MacDonald's thesis. The
first is that it is largely built on the assumption that Jews are
dishonest. It is always risky to assume one understands the motives of
others better than they do themselves. Jews have traditionally thought
of themselves as a benevolent presence, even as a "light unto the
nations" or a "chosen people." This is echoed today in the Jewish self
image as champions of the excluded and the oppressed. Most of the time
what passes for "social justice" has the effect of undermining the
traditions and loyalties of gentile society, but are Jews deliberately
undermining these things rather than righting what they perceive to be
wrongs?
Prof. MacDonald concedes that many Jews are sincere in their support
for liberal causes, but then escalates his indictment by arguing that
"the best deceivers are those who deceive themselves." In other words,
many Jews who are actually working for Jewish interests have first
convinced themselves otherwise. A Jew who mainly wants America to
become less white may also have convinced himself that America
benefits from a multitude of cultures. Having convinced himself he can
more effectively convince others.
Many Jews, Prof. MacDonald argues, are not even conscious of the
extent to which their Jewishness is central to their identities or
their political views. He quotes Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel on his
surprise at how passionately he embraced the Israeli side during the
1967 war:
"I had not known how Jewish I was." This is an arresting statement
from a man who was thought to be perhaps the greatest Jewish spiritual
leader of his time. And whether or not it affects their politics, Jews
certainly appear to have a very vivid sense of peoplehood. Prof.
MacDonald quotes theologian Eugene Borowitz as saying,"most Jews claim
to be equipped with an interpersonal friend-or-foe sensing device that
enables them to detect the presence of another Jew, despite heavy
camouflage." Always to think in terms of "friends or foe" is no
insignificant matter.
Prof. MacDonald is therefore skeptical of Jewish disavowals: "Surface
declarations of a lack of Jewish identity may be highly misleading."
He notes that Jewish publications write about the power and influence
of American Jews in language Jews would immediately denounce as
"anti-Semitic" if used by gentiles. He agrees with Joseph Sobran, who
has said "they want to be Jews among themselves but resent being seen
as Jews by Gentiles. They want to pursue their own distinct interests
while pretending that they have no such interests ... "
Prof. MacDonald argues that the success of Jewish-led intellectual
movements has been possible only because their Jewish character was
hidden. If multi-culturalism or mass immigration or The Authoritarian
Personality had been promoted by Orthodox Jews in black coats the
Jewish element would have been clear. Prof. MacDonald writes that in
fact, "the Jewish political agenda was not an aspect of the theory and
the theories themselves had no overt Jewish content. Gentile
intellectuals approaching these theories were therefore unlikely to
view them as aspects of Jewish-gentile cultural competition or as an
aspect of a specifically Jewish political agenda." Prof. MacDonald
also claims that Jews have often tried to conceal the Jewish character
of an intellectual movement by recruiting token gentiles for visible
positions as spokesmen. He writes that this tactic was so common in
the American Communist Party that gentiles often saw through it and
resigned.
But how can motives ever be completely known? Prof. MacDonald sets a
difficult test: "The best evidence that individuals have really ceased
to have a Jewish identity is if they choose a political option that
they perceive as clearly not in the interest of Jews as a group. In
the absence of a clearly perceived conflict with Jewish interests, it
remains possible that different political choices among ethnic Jews
are only differences in tactics for how best to achieve Jewish
interests."
This standard may seem unduly harsh -- until it is applied to white
gentiles. Third-World immigration, affirmative action,
anti-discrimination laws, and forced integration are clearly not in
the interests of whites, yet many whites embrace them, thus
demonstrating how completely they have abandoned their racial
identity.
Finally, Prof. MacDonald raises the disturbing possibility that some
Jews, because of centuries of conflict with gentiles, actively hate
gentile society and consciously wish to destroy it: "a fundamental
motivation of Jewish intellectuals involved in social criticism has
simply been hatred of the gentile-dominated power structure perceived
as anti-Semitic." He describes the 19th century German-Jewish poet
Heinrich Heine as "using his skill, reputation and popularity to
undermine the intellectual confidence of the established order."
In defense of this highly provocative view, Prof. MacDonald quotes
Benjamin Disraeli on the effects of centuries of Jewish-gentile
relations on Jews: "They may have become so odious and so hostile to
mankind as to merit for their present conduct, no matter how
occasioned, the obloquy and ill-treatment of the communities in which
they dwell and with which they are scarcely permitted to mingle."
Apart from any questions of motives, however, is the question of
numbers. Jews are a tiny minority in the United States and within that
minority there is disagreement even on matters that clearly affect
Jews. How can Jews possibly be responsible for dramatic changes in the
intellectual landscape? In Prof. MacDonald's view, the explanation
lies in the intelligence, energy, dedication, and cohesiveness of
Jews. He attributes a great deal to the average IQ of Jews -- at 115,
a full standard deviation above the white gentile average -- and to
"their hard work and dedication, their desire to make a mark on the
world, and their desire to rise in the world, engage in personal
promotion, and achieve public acclaim... " He also believes Jews have
worked together unfailingly on any question they consider necessary
for survival:
"Intellectual activity is like any other human endeavor: Cohesive
groups outcompete individual strategies." He notes that there has
never been a time when large numbers of white Americans favored
non-white immigration; it was a cohesive, determined minority that
beat down the disorganized resistance of the majority.
Prof. MacDonald believes that because of the effectiveness of some
Jews, it was not even necessary that most Jews actively support
anti-majoritarian movements, but that Jewish activity was still
decisive. As he puts it, "Jewish-dominated intellectual movements were
a critical factor (necessary condition) for the triumph of the
intellectual left in late twentieth-century Western societies." This,
of course, can never be tested, but there can be no doubt that
American Jews have had a disproportionate effect on the American
intellect. Prof. MacDonald quotes Walter Kerr, writing in 1968, to the
effect that "what has happened since World War II is that the American
sensibility has become part Jewish, perhaps as much Jewish as it is
anything else... The literate American mind has come in some measure
to think Jewishly."
Aside from the question of whether Prof. MacDonald is right is the
further question of what difference it makes if he is right. If
correct, his thesis certainly sheds light on the rapidity with which
whites lost their will. Just a few decades ago whites were a confident
race, proud of their achievements, convinced of their fitness to
dominate the globe. Today they are a declining, apologetic people,
ashamed of their history and not sure even of their claim to lands
they have occupied for centuries. It is very rare for fundamental
concepts to be stood on their heads in the course of just a generation
or two, as has happened with thinking about race. Such speed suggests
there has been something more than natural change.
Topaz
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
Topaz
2006-08-20
By Jean Bricmont
Americans are constantly told that they have to defend themselves
against people who "hate them", but without understanding why they are
hated. Is the cause our secular democracy? Our appetite for oil? There
are lots of democracies in the world that are far more secular than
the United States (Sweden, France...) and lots of places that want to
buy oil at the best possible price (China) without arousing any
noticeable hatred in the Middle East.
Of course, it is true that, throughout the Third World, Americans and
Europeans are often considered arrogant and are not particularly
liked. But the level of hatred that leads a large number of people to
applaud an event like September 11 is peculiar to the Middle East.
Indeed, the main political significance of September 11 did not derive
from the number of people killed or even the spectacular achievement
of the attackers, but from the fact that the attack was popular in
large parts of the Middle East. That much was understood by Americans
leaders and infuriated them. Such a level of hatred calls for
explanation.
And there can be only one explanation: United States support for
Israel. It is indeed Israel that is the main object of hatred, for
reasons we shall describe, but since the United States uncritically
supports Israel on almost every issue, constantly praises it as "the
only democracy in the Middle East" and provides its main financial
backing, the result is a "transfer" of hatred.
Why is Israel so hated? The constant stalling of "peace plans" in
favor of more settlements and more war aggravates that hatred, but the
basic cause lies in the very principles on which that state is built.
There are basically two arguments that have justified establishing the
State of Israel in Palestine: one is that "God" gave that land to the
Jews, and the other is the Holocaust. The first one is deeply
insulting to people who are profoundly religious, like most Arabs, but
of another creed. And, for the second, it amounts to making people pay
for a crime that they did not commit.
Both arguments claim that it is right for Jews, and only Jews, to set
up a state in a land that would obviously be Arab, like Jordan or
Lebanon, if not for the slow Zionist invasion. This is illustrated by
the "law of return": any Jew, anywhere, having no connection with
Palestine whatsoever, and not suffering from the slightest
persecution, can, if he so wishes, emigrate to Israel and easily
become a citizen, while the inhabitants who fled in 1948, or their
children, cannot. Add to that the fact that a city claimed to be holy
by three religions has become the "eternal capital of the Jewish
people" (and only them) and one should start to understand the rage
that all this provokes throughout the Arab and Muslim world.
It is precisely this [Jewish supremacist] aspect that infuriates most
Arabs, even if they do not have any personal connection to Palestine.
This situation delegitimizes the Arab regimes that are impotent in the
face of the Zionist enemy and, after the defeat of the region's two
main secular leaders, Nasser and Saddam Hussein (the latter thanks to
the U.S.), leads to the rise of religious fundamentalism.
The conflict over Palestine goes beyond the second class status of
Israeli Arabs or even the treatment of the Occupied Territories. Even
if a Palestinian state were established on the latter, and even if
full equality were granted to Israeli Arabs, the wounds of 1948 would
not heal quickly. Arab leaders, even religious ones, can of course
sign peace agreements with Israel, but they are fragile so long as the
Arab population considers them unjust and does not accept them
wholeheartedly. Palestine is the Alsace-Lorraine or the Taiwan of the
Arab world and the fact that it is impossible to take it back does not
mean that it can be forgotten . (I am not arguing here in favor of
"wiping Israel off the map", or in favor of a "one state solution" but
simply underlining what seems to me to be the root and the depth of
the problem. In fact, I am not arguing for any solution partly because
none seems to me to be attainable in the short term, but, more
fundamentally, because I do not think that outsiders to the Middle
East should propose such solutions.)
There is no sign that any of this is understood in Israel by more than
a few individuals; if Arabs hate them, this is just another instance
of the fact that everybody hates Jews and it only proves that they
have to "defend themselves" (i.e. attack others pre-emptively) by any
means necessary. That is bad enough, but why isn't this understood in
the United States either? There are traditionally two answers to that:
one is that the population is manipulated into supporting Israel by
the government, the arms merchants or the oil industry, because Israel
is a strategic U.S. ally; the other answer is that the United States
is manipulated by the Israel lobby. The idea that Israel is a
strategic ally, if by that one means a useful ally (useful to, say,
the oil interests, broadly understood), although widely accepted,
specially in the Left, does not survive a critical examination. That
may have been the case in 1967 or even during the Cold War period,
although one could argue that, even then, the Arab states were
attracted by the Soviet Union only because it might support them in
their struggle against Israel, albeit ineffectively. But both in 1991
and in 2003, the United States attacked Iraq without any help from
Israel, even begging Israel not to intervene in 1991, in order for its
Arab coalition not to collapse. Or consider the post-2003 occupation
of Iraq, and suppose that the goal of that occupation is control over
oil. In what sense does Israel help in that respect? Everything it
does (the currents attacks on Gaza and Lebanon for example) further
alienates the Arabs, and U.S. support for Israel makes the control of
oil harder, not easier. Even the Iraqi parliament, Malaki and Sistani,
who are the closest to allies that the United States can find there,
condemn Israel's actions.
Finally, just imagine that the United States would make a 180 [degree]
turn and suddenly side with the Palestinians, as they did with the
Kosovars against the Serbs. Such a change of policies is by no means
impossible: when Indonesia invaded East Timor in 1975, the US
supported the invasion by providing most of Indonesia's weapons. Yet,
25 years later, the U.S. supported, or at least did not oppose, East
Timor's accession to independence.
What effect would that have? Can anyone doubt that such a change of
policy would facilitate U.S. access to oil fields and help it gain
strategic allies (if any were still needed) throughout the Muslim
world? In the Middle East, the main charge against the United States
is that it is pro-Israel, because it lets itself be "manipulated by
the Jews". Therefore, if Washington switched sides, there would be no
more basis for hostility to U.S. presence, including its control over
oil. Thus the notion of Israel as "strategic ally" makes no sense.
This leads us to the "Israel lobby" answer, which is closer to the
truth, but not the whole truth. To get a complete picture, one has to
understand why the lobby works as effectively as it does, and that
depends on factors lying outside the actions of the lobby itself.
After all, the militant Zionists constituting the lobby are a minority
among Jews, who themselves form a small minority of the American
population. The Israel lobby does not work like other lobbies, for
example, the arms and the oil industry lobbies (which is one of the
reasons why it is easy to dismiss it as irrelevant, as long as one
does not understand how it really exerts its influence).
Of course, like the latter, the Israel lobby does fund electoral
campaigns and its power derives in part from its ability to target
people in Congress who deviate from its "line". But if that were all,
it could be easily defeated -indeed. There are other sources of
electoral funding, the big industrial lobbies for example, and if the
pro-Israel candidates could be shown to be paid to serve the interests
of another state, their opponents could denounce the people who
receive money from the lobby as some sort of agents of a foreign
power. Just imagine a pro-French, pro-Chinese or pro-Japanese lobby
that would try to significantly influence the U.S. Congress.
Certainly, money alone cannot suffice.
What protects the Israel lobby is the fact that anyone who would
denounce an opponent funded by the Lobby as a quasi-agent of a foreign
power would immediately be accused of anti-Semitism. In fact, imagine
that big business is unhappy with the current U.S. policies (as it
well may be) and wants to change them-how could they do it? Any
criticism of lobby influence on U.S. policy would immediately trigger
the anti-Zionism-is-anti-Semitism accusation.
So the strength of the Israel lobby resides in part in this second
line of defense, which itself is linked to its influence on the media.
But even that could easily be defeated-not all the media are under the
lobby's influence, and, more importantly, the media are not
all-powerful: in Venezuela, they are anti-Chavez, but Chavez regularly
wins elections. In France, the media were overwhelmingly in favor of
the "yes" vote to the referendum on the European Constitution, yet the
"no" won. The problem-and this is why the Israel lobby is so
effective, is that it expresses a world view that is accepted too
easily by too many Americans. After all, nothing could be more
ridiculous than accusing someone of anti-Semitism because he wants or
claims to put America's interests above those of Israel. Yet, the
accusation is likely to be effective, but only because years of
ideological brainwashing have predisposed people to consider U.S. and
Israeli interests as identical-although instead of "interests" one
speaks of "values".
Associated with this identification comes a systematically hostile
view of the Arab and Muslim world, which both increases the lobby's
effectiveness and is in part the result of its propaganda. There is an
almost total lack of understanding of the Arab viewpoint on Palestine,
and, in particular, of the [Jewish supremacist] nature of the problem.
It is this triple layer of control (selective funding, the
anti-Semitism card, or rather canard, and interiorization) that gives
the lobby its peculiar strength. (And that is also why it is easy to
dismiss its strength by saying, for instance, that, obviously, Jews
don't control America. Sure, but direct control is not the way it
works.)
People who think that it is the arms or the oil industry that are
running the show in Washington as far as foreign policy is concerned
should at least answer the following question: how does it work? There
is no evidence whatsoever that the oil industry, for example, pushed
for the Iraq war, the threats against Iran, or the attack on Lebanon .
(There is a lot of evidence that the Israel lobby pushed for the Iraq
war; see Jeff Blankfort, A War for Israel). They are supposed to act
secretly, of course, but where is the evidence that they do? And if
there is no evidence, even no indirect evidence, how does one know?
Profits from the war, at least for major corporations, haven't
materialized yet, and there are many indications that the U.S. economy
will suffer a lot from war-related expenses and the associated
deficits. On the other hand, it is enough to open any mainstream U.S.
newspaper or TV and read or hear opinions expressed by Zionists
calling for more war. War needs war propaganda and a supporting
ideology, and the Zionists provide it, while none of this is offered
by big business in general or the oil industry in particular.
When people in the antiwar movement divert attention from Israel by
blaming big oil or big business for the wars (specially the one in
Lebanon, or the threats against Iran) one should demand that they
provide some evidence for their claims. Challenge all the apologists
or excuse makers for Israel or its lobby within progressive circles.
When politicians and journalists claim that Israel and the United
States have common interests, ask what services exactly has Israel
rendered to the United States recently. Of course one can always point
to some (minor) services; but, then, ask them what a cold-blooded
cost-benefits analysis would reveal and why such an analysis is
impossible to undertake publicly. If they speak of common values (the
fallback position), provide a list of discriminatory Israeli laws for
non-Jews.
It is true that a change in the U.S. policy with respect to the
Israel-Palestine conflict would change nothing about traditional
imperialism-the United States would still support traditional elites
everywhere, and press countries to provide a "favorable investment
climate". But the conflict in the Middle East, involving Iraq, Iran,
Lebanon, Syria, and Palestine, has all the aspects of a religious
war-with Islam on one side and Zionism as a secular "Western" religion
on the other. And wars of religion tend to be the most brutal and
uncontrollable of all wars. What is at stake in the de-Zionization of
the American mind is not only the fate of the unfortunate inhabitants
of Palestine but also unspeakable miseries for the people of that
region and maybe of the rest of the world. The ultimate irony in all
this is that the fate of much of the world depends on the American
people exercizing their right to self-determination, which, of course,
they should.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> PARROTED...
...Anti-Semitic SWILL, that was in NO WAY a
response to any post that I made.
<<flush idiocy>
....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'.~./
..........\....FOAD,... _.·´
............\.obnoxious.(
..............\..LOSER!..\..
Topaz
FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western country at
one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France, Portugal and
Germany.
FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
by Jews.
FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime
(such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number
of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR
MORE FREQUENTLY.
FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
Wall Street Jews.
FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remained in
charge of the organization till 1970.
FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false,
(and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the
Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous
Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories
acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of
homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings
and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six
Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these
widely-believed but false stories is illegal in most countries of the
Western world, and 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for
questioning these and similar dogmas. Can you figure out what powerful
international ethnic group was responsible for causing these laws to
be passed?
FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the
Holocaust has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
dollars to Israel by the German government. Furthermore, Jews
everywhere continue to use the Holocaust as a tool for extracting
money from gentiles, whether thru the movies (more than 400 have been
made on this subject), Holocaust museums, 'reparations' (more than a
billion from the Swiss, billions from German companies, etc) and the
like. There is a saying widely used among Jews which goes, "There's no
business like Shoah [Holocaust] business." Can you figure out why the
Jewish establishment has been so eager to suppress questioning of the
Holocau$$$t dogma?
FACT: Israel is the only 'Western' country to legally sanction
torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force
attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms
enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the
major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the
Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify
freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for
suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers
of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American
culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.
Source
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Lbl/Lbl-VitalFactsYouNeedToKnow.html
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western
> country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France,
> Portugal and Germany.
To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
shows that those countries contained 'WAT to may loons who
were as IGNORANT as YOU are.
> FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
> newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
> by Jews.
Making them good, entrepreneurial capitalists, in such cases. GOOD
for them! Kudos!!
> FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime
> (such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number
> of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR
> MORE FREQUENTLY.
The media likes to sell papers. WEIRD things like that sell papers.
> FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
> communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
> the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
> Wall Street Jews.
Likely, in same cases. NO big deal!
> FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
> destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
If so, it obviously didn't work. So no biggie.
> FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remain-
> ed in charge of the organization till 1970.
So???
> FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false,
> (and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the
> Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous
> Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories
> acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of
> homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings
> and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six
> Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these widely-believed
> but false stories is illegal in most countries of the Western world, and
> 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for questioning these and
> similar dogmas.
Actually, it is LUDICROUS for any country to regard ANY person's
harmless OPINIONS to be illegal. Since the more ABSURD the opinions
are (such as yours), the more the person MAKING them self-destructs
by making a total LAUGHINGSTOCK of himself.
> Can you figure out what powerful international ethnic group was
> responsible for causing these laws to be passed?
WHOEVER voted for those laws was off the deep end.
AS your living in denial of the horrors of the Holocaust, all those
PHOTOS and FILMS taken of the victims prove you to be a complete
ignoramus.
> FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the
> Holocaust...
BZZZzzttt!!! The Holocaust was REAL. See above. (Do you believe
that the sky is green, too?)
> ...has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
> dollars to Israel by the German government.
IF so, GOOD. That doesn't even scratch the surface of the
damage that the Nazi did to the Jews.
> Furthermore, Jews everywhere continue to use the Holocaust
> as a tool for extracting money from gentiles, whether thru the
> movies (more than 400 have been made on this subject), Holocaust
> museums, ...
Let me guess. Someone dragged YOU, kicking and screaming, to
buy tickets to those, right? Because if NOT, you have ZERO to whine
about.
> ...'reparations' (more than a billion from the Swiss, billions from
> German companies, etc) and the like. There is a saying widely used
> among Jews which goes, "There's no business like Shoah [Holocaust]
> business." Can you figure out why the Jewish establishment has
> been so eager to suppress questioning of the Holocaut dogma?
Yeah. Because 6 MILLION of 'em were MURDERED!
> FACT: Israel is the only Western country to legally sanction
> torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
> shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
PROVE it!
> FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force
> attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms
> enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the
> major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the
> Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify
> freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for
> suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers
> of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American
> culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.
EVERY American has the right to express his opinions, either
formally or informally, pertaining to the Constitution.
It can only be AMENDED upon consent of the VAST majority
of Americans and their elected representative.
So your PARANOIA is noted, *along* with your being delusional.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
••• Rest in Peace •••
••• George Richard Tiller, MD •••
••• A True American HERO! •••
••• August 8, 1941 – May 31, 2009 •••
••• Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com •••
"He saved the lives of thousands of women who would've
died otherwise, thousands who would've been made sterile
or gravely injured by childbirth. He knew his life was at grave
risk. Dr. Tiller was a true Saint."
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
-- Craig Chilton (E-Mail me if you wish, from websites below.)
http://www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the hateful RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Cult Bigotry
http://www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
http://www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!
Kevin Alfred Strom
> On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:34:00 -0500,
> Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western
>> country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France,
>> Portugal and Germany.
>
> To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
> shows that those countries contained 'WAT to may loons who
> were as IGNORANT as YOU are.
I think you're getting on his nerves, Topaz. For whatever that's worth.
Most of the lunacy can be avoided, I suspect, by deleting the
Limbaugh group when you post or reply.
Faithfully,
Kevin Alfred Strom.
--
http://kevinalfredstrom.com/
RHF
wrote:
> (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Sep 2010 11:34:00 -0500,
> > Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western
> >> country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France,
> >> Portugal and Germany.
>
> > To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
> > shows that those countries contained 'WAT to may loons who
> > were as IGNORANT as YOU are.
>
> [...]
>
> I think you're getting on his nerves, Topaz. For whatever that's worth.
- Most of the lunacy can be avoided,
- I suspect, by deleting the Limbaugh
- group when you post or reply.
KAS - I see that you take your own advise :o)
-but-if- You want to have an argument : You
have to find some one who wants to argue too.
can we agree to be disagreeable -or- not ;-} ~ RHF
.
.
> Faithfully,
>
> Kevin Alfred Strom.
> --http://kevinalfredstrom.com/
RHF
> In article <i63prt$da...@tioat.net>,- - I think you're getting on his nerves, Topaz.
- - For whatever that's worth.
- I am amazed anyone admires Topaz.
In the Middle of the Deep Darkness of the Night
The Cool Moon Light Illuminates My Path
Its Faint Rays Warm My Spirit
and Cast Out My Fears - the-babu-roy ~ RHF©
-translation- Everyone and Everything
. . . Is Good For Something
{The 'Sum' Thing}
.
-ps- you just got to find that s o m e t h i n g . . .
.
>
> --
> Damn the living - It's a lovely life. I'm whoever you want me to be.
> Silver silverware - Where is the love? At least I can stay in character.
> Oval swimming pool - Where is the love? Annoying Usenet one post at a time.
> Damn the living - It's a lovely life. Blessed be.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
== Re-posted to correct a few previously-missed typos. ==
> FACT: The Jews have been expelled from almost every Western
> country at one time or another, including Britain, Spain, France,
> Portugal and Germany.
To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
shows that those countries contained many loons who were as
IGNORANT as YOU are.
> FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
> newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
> by Jews.
Making them good, entrepreneurial capitalists, in such cases. GOOD
for them! Kudos!!
> FACT: The major media incessantly harps on any white-on-black crime
> (such as the Jasper TX dragging), yet ignores the much greater number
> of black- on-white crimes which are equally horrific yet happen FAR
> MORE FREQUENTLY.
The media likes to sell papers. WEIRD things like that sell papers.
> FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
> communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
> the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
> Wall Street Jews.
Likely, in some cases. NO big deal!
> FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
> destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
If so, it obviously didn't work. So no biggie.
> FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remain-
> ed in charge of the organization till 1970.
So???
> FACT: Most of the 'Orthodox Jewish version' of the Holocaust is false,
> (and in fact is significantly based on 'confessions' of Germans at the
> Nuremberg Military Tribunal obtained under torture), and numerous
> Jewish scholars have actually acknowledged this. (The stories
> acknowledged by Jewish scholars to be false include the existence of
> homicidal gas chambers, the use of Jewish skin for lampshade coverings
> and Jewish body fat for soap, and the assertion that there were 'Six
> Million' Jews killed by the nazis.) But questioning these widely-believed
> but false stories is illegal in most countries of the Western world, and
> 8,000 people are in jail in Germany alone for questioning these and
> similar dogmas.
Actually, it is LUDICROUS for any country to regard ANY person's
harmless OPINIONS to be illegal. Since the more ABSURD the opinions
are (such as yours), the more the person MAKING them self-destructs
by making a total LAUGHINGSTOCK of himself.
> Can you figure out what powerful international ethnic group was
> responsible for causing these laws to be passed?
WHOEVER voted for those laws was off the deep end.
AS for your living in denial of the horrors of the Holocaust, all
those PHOTOS and FILMS taken of the victims prove you to be a
complete ignoramus.
> FACT: Sympathy and guilt for the (largely false) story of the
> Holocaust...
BZZZzzttt!!! The Holocaust was REAL. See above. (Do you believe
that the sky is green, too?)
> ...has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
> dollars to Israel by the German government.
IF so, GOOD. That doesn't even scratch the surface of the
damage that the Nazis did to the Jews.
> Furthermore, Jews everywhere continue to use the Holocaust
> as a tool for extracting money from gentiles, whether thru the
> movies (more than 400 have been made on this subject), Holocaust
> museums, ...
Let me guess. Someone dragged YOU, kicking and screaming, to
buy tickets to those, right? Because if NOT, you have ZERO to whine
about.
> ...'reparations' (more than a billion from the Swiss, billions from
> German companies, etc) and the like. There is a saying widely used
> among Jews which goes, "There's no business like Shoah [Holocaust]
> business." Can you figure out why the Jewish establishment has
> been so eager to suppress questioning of the Holocaut dogma?
Yeah. Because 6 MILLION of 'em were MURDERED!
> FACT: Israel is the only Western country to legally sanction
> torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
> shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
PROVE it!
> FACT: Jewish political influence has been the principal force
> attempting to nullify our Constitution, and particularly the freedoms
> enjoyed under the Bill of Rights. For example, Jews have been the
> major force behind 'gun control' (ie, the attempt to nullify the
> Second Amendment), integration and affirmative action (to nullify
> freedom of association), 'hate crimes' (laying the foundation for
> suppressing freedom of speech), immigration (introducing large numbers
> of unassimilable nonwhites which will effectively destroy American
> culture and ideals), anti-militia statutes and similar efforts.
EVERY American has the right to express his opinions, either
formally or informally, pertaining to the Constitution.
It can only be AMENDED upon consent of the VAST majority
of Americans and their elected representatives.
Topaz
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <x...@v.com> wrote:
> To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
>shows that those countries contained 'WAT to may loons who
>were as IGNORANT as YOU are.
What is more likely, there is something wrong with all other people,
or there is something wrong with Jews?
>
>> FACT: Virtually all the major media outlets, including TV networks,
>> newspapers, movie studios and book publishers, are owned or controlled
>> by Jews.
>
> Making them good, entrepreneurial capitalists, in such cases. GOOD
>for them! Kudos!!
The Riddle of the Jew's Success
F. Roderich-Stoltheim (T. Fritsch)
This rare and valuable book provides a detailed analysis of Jewish
behavior and thinking. A reprint of the English-language edition of
1927. After Germany's defeat in 1945, this book was banned by the
Allied occupation authorities, and nearly all copies were destroyed.
Written by the influential German publicist Theodor Fritsch, it
appeared under a pen name. This book helps in understanding the scope
and intensity of anti-Jewish feeling in Germany during the 1920s and
1930s.
Here are some quotes:
"When in the year 1890, a petition was sent from the anti-Jewish camp
to a number of Imperial and local authorities, containing the request
that a commission of independent savants should be appointed, whose
duty would be to examine carefully the passages in dispute, in not a
single instance was the request granted. The Prussian Ministry of
Culture dismissed any such step as 'impracticable'. If one compares
the thoroughness with which the morality of the Jesuits has been and
is still discussed in public, one if forced to accept the view, that
the zealous friends of truth and opponents of those, who work in an
obscure and devious manner, know how to restrain their zeal for
enlightenment in a truly remarkable way so far as the Jews are
concerned.
The position is thus a very peculiar one. This much is established:
The German national representative bodies and governments have given
the Jews equal civic rights, and have recognized them as a separate
religious community, without making any inquiry whether the moral
instruction of the Jews is compatible with the welfare of the state."
"Many people consider themselves very clever when they impart advice
to the merchant, who complains he is unable to hold his own against
the Jews: do the same as the Jew! In reality this amounts to the
following: do not recognize any religious motives whatever in your
mode of doing business, and descend to the level of a low
money-grubber and voluptary.
The economic principle of the Jew threatens to trample under foot, in
our time, all the higher principles of life."
Topaz
<kevin...@revilo-oliver.com> wrote:
>
>I think you're getting on his nerves, Topaz. For whatever that's worth.
>
>Most of the lunacy can be avoided, I suspect, by deleting the
>Limbaugh group when you post or reply.
>
>
>Faithfully,
>
>
>Kevin Alfred Strom.
There could be some decent but misguided people on Limbaugh groups.
Anyway the lunatics don't bother me. They can foam at the mouth all
they want and I couldn't care less.
Topaz
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <x...@v.com> wrote:
>
> To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
>shows that those countries contained many loons who were as
>IGNORANT as YOU are.
What is more likely, there is something wrong with all other people,
or there is something wrong with Jews?
> Making them good, entrepreneurial capitalists, in such cases. GOOD
>for them! Kudos!!
The Riddle of the Jew's Success
F. Roderich-Stoltheim (T. Fritsch)
Here are some quotes:
>
> The media likes to sell papers. WEIRD things like that sell papers.
>
>> FACT: Communism was a largely-Jewish phenomenon. Almost all the top
>> communists of the Russian Revolution were Jews, as well as almost all
>> the atomic spies, and the Revolution was financed in large measure by
>> Wall Street Jews.
>
> Likely, in some cases. NO big deal!
>
>> FACT: In the late 1920s the Communist Party USA decided on a policy of
>> destroying American society by pushing 'racial equality'.
>
> If so, it obviously didn't work. So no biggie.
>
>> FACT: The NAACP was founded principally by Jews, and Jews remain-
>> ed in charge of the organization till 1970.
>
> So???
>
>
> Actually, it is LUDICROUS for any country to regard ANY person's
>harmless OPINIONS to be illegal. Since the more ABSURD the opinions
>are (such as yours), the more the person MAKING them self-destructs
>by making a total LAUGHINGSTOCK of himself.
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absense
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
>
>> Can you figure out what powerful international ethnic group was
>> responsible for causing these laws to be passed?
>
> WHOEVER voted for those laws was off the deep end.
>
> AS for your living in denial of the horrors of the Holocaust, all
>those PHOTOS and FILMS taken of the victims prove you to be a
>complete ignoramus.
by Theodore J. O'Keefe
Nothing has been more effective in establishing the authenticity of
the Holocaust story in the minds of Americans than the terrible scenes
US troops discovered when they entered German concentration camps at
the close of World War II.
At Dachau, Buchenwald, Dora, Mauthausen, and other work and detention
camps, horrified US infantrymen encountered heaps of dead and dying
inmates, emaciated and diseased. Survivors told them hair-raising
stories of torture and slaughter, and backed up their claims by
showing the GIs crematory ovens, alleged execution gas chambers,
supposed implements of torture, and even shrunken heads and
lampshades, gloves, and handbags purportedly made from skin flayed
from dead inmates.
US government authorities, mindful that many Americans who remembered
the atrocity stories fed them during World War I still doubted the
Allied propaganda directed against the Hitler regime, resolved to
"document" what the GIs had found in the camps. Prominent newsmen
and politicians were flown in to see the harrowing evidence, while
the US Army Signal Corps filmed and photographed the scenes for
posterity. Famous journalist Edward R. Murrow reported, in tones of
horror, but no longer of disbelief, what he had been told and shown,
and Dachau and
Buchenwald were branded on the hearts and minds of the American
populace as names of infamy unmatched in the sad and bloody history
of this planet.
For Americans, what was "discovered" at the camps -- the dead and the
diseased, the terrible stories of the inmates, all the props of
torture and terror -- became the basis not simply of a transitory
propaganda campaign but of the conviction that, yes, it was true: the
Germans did exterminate six million Jews, most of them in lethal gas
chambers.
What the GIs found was used, by way of films that were mandatory
viewing for the vanquished populace of Germany, to "re-educate" the
German people by destroying their national pride and their will to a
united, independent national state, imposing in their place
overwhelming feelings of collective guilt and political impotence.
And when the testimony, and the verdict, of the Nuremberg Tribunal
incorporated most, if not all, of the horror stories Americans were
told about
Dachau, Buchenwald, and other places captured by the US Army, the
Holocaust could pass for one of the most documented, one of the most
authenticated, one of the most proven historical episodes in the
human record.
A Different Reality
But it is known today that, very soon after the liberation of the
camps, American authorities were aware that the real story of the
camps was quite different from the one in which they were coaching
military public information officers, government spokesmen,
politicians, journalists, and other mouthpieces.
When American and British forces overran western and central Germany
in the spring of 1945, they were followed by troops charged with
discovering and securing any evidence of German war crimes.
Among them was Dr. Charles Larson, one of America's leading forensic
pathologists, who was assigned to the US Army's Judge Advocate
General's Department. As part of a US War Crimes Investigation Team,
Dr. Larson performed autopsies at Dachau and some twenty other German
camps, examining on some days more than 100 corpses. After his grim
work at Dachau, he was
questioned for three days by US Army prosecutors.
Dr. Larson's findings? In an 1980 newspaper interview he said: "What
we've heard is that six million Jews were exterminated. Part of that
is a hoax." And what part was the hoax? Dr. Larson, who told his
biographer that to his knowledge he "was the only forensic pathologist
on duty in the entire European Theater" of Allied military operations,
confirmed that "never was a case of poison gas uncovered."
Typhus, Not Poison Gas
If not by gassing, how did the unfortunate victims at Dachau,
Buchenwald and Bergen-Belsen perish? Were they tortured to death or
deliberately starved? The answers to these questions are known as
well.
As Dr. Larson and other Allied medical men discovered, the chief
cause of death at Dachau, Belsen and the other camps was disease,
above all typhus, an old and terrible scourge of mankind that until
recently flourished in places where populations were crowded together
in circumstances where public health measures were unknown or had
broken down. Such was the case in the overcrowded internment camps in
Germany at war's end, where, despite such measures as systematic
delousing, quarantine of the sick and cremation of the dead, the
virtual
collapse of Germany's food, transport, and public health systems led
to catastrophe.
Perhaps the most authoritative statement of the facts as to typhus and
mortality in the camps has been made by Dr. John E. Gordon, M.D.,
Ph.D., a professor of preventive medicine and epidemiology at the
Harvard University School of Public Health, who was with US forces in
Germany in 1945. Dr. Gordon reported in 1948 that "The outbreaks in
concentration camps and prisons made up the great bulk of typhus
infection encountered in Germany." Dr. Gordon summarized the causes
for the outbreaks as follows:
Germany in the spring months of April and May [1945] was an
astounding sight, a mixture of humanity travelling this way and that,
homeless, often hungry and carrying typhus with them ...Germany was in
chaos. The destruction of whole cities and the path left by advancing
armies produced a disruption of living conditions contributing to the
spread of the disease. Sanitation was low grade, public utilities were
seriously disrupted, food supply and food distribution was poor,
housing was inadequate and order and discipline were everywhere
lacking. Still more important, a shifting of populations was occurring
such as few countries and few times have experienced.
Dr. Gordon's findings are corroborated by Dr. Russell Barton, today a
psychiatrist of international repute, who entered Bergen-Belsen with
British forces as a young medical student in 1945. Barton, who
volunteered to care for the diseased survivors, testified under sworn
oath in a Toronto courtroom in 1985 that "Thousands of prisoners who
died at the Bergen-Belsen concentration camp during World War II
weren't deliberately starved to death but died from a rash of
diseases."
Dr. Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited
stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue
after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously
maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed
each day.
Despite noisily publicized claims and widespread popular notions to
the contrary, no researcher has been able to document a German policy
of extermination through starvation in the German camps.
No 'Human Skin' Lampshades
What of the ghoulish stories of concentration camp inmates skinned for
their tattoos, flayed to make lampshades and handbags, or other
artifacts? What of the innumerable "torture racks," "meathooks,"
whipping posts, gallows, and other tools of torment and death that are
reported to have abounded at every German camp? These allegations, and
even more grotesque ones proffered by Soviet prosecutors, found their
way into the record at Nuremberg.
The lampshade and tattooed-skin charges were made against Ilse Koch,
dubbed by journalists the "Bitch of Buchenwald," who was reported to
have furnished her house with objects manufactured from the tanned
hides of luckless inmates.
But General Lucius Clay, military governor of the US zone of occupied
Germany, who reviewed her case in 1948, told his superiors in
Washington: "There is no convincing evidence that she [Ilse Koch]
selected inmates for extermination in order to secure tattooed skins
or that she possessed any articles made of human skin." In an
interview General Clay gave years later, he stated about the material
for the infamous lampshades: "Well, it turned out actually that it was
goat flesh. But
at the trial it was still human flesh. It was almost impossible for
her to have gotten a fair trial." Ilse Koch hanged herself in a German
jail in 1967.
It would be tedious to itemize and refute the thousands of bizarre
claims as to Nazi atrocities. That there were instances of German
cruelty, however, is clear from the testimony of Dr. Konrad Morgen, a
legal investigator attached to the Reich Criminal Police, whose
statements on the witness stand at Nuremberg have never been
challenged by proponents of the Jewish Holocaust story. Dr. Morgen
informed the court that he had been given full authority by Heinrich
Himmler,
commander of Hitler's SS and the dread Gestapo, to enter any German
concentration camp and investigate instances of cruelty and corruption
on the part of camp personnel. As he explained in sworn testimony at
Nuremberg, Dr. Morgen investigated 800 such cases, resulting in more
than 200 convictions. Punishments included the death penalty for the
worst offenders, including Hermann Florstedt, commandant of Lublin
(Majdanek), and Karl Koch (Ilse's husband), commandant of Buchenwald.
While German camp commandants in certain cases did inflict physical
punishment, such acts had to be approved by authorities in Berlin, and
it was required that a camp physician first certify the good health of
the prisoner to be disciplined, and then be on hand at the actual
beating. After all, throughout most of the war the camps were
important centers of industrial activity. The good health and morale
of the prisoners was critical to the German war effort, as is
evidenced in a January 1943 order issued by SS General Richard Glücks,
chief of the office that supervised the
concentration camps. It held the camp commanders "personally
responsible for exhausting every possibility to preserve the physical
strength of the detainees." Camp Survivors: Merely Victims?
US Army investigators, working at Buchenwald and other camps, quickly
ascertained what was common knowledge among veteran inmates: that the
worst offenders, the cruelest denizens of the camps, were not the
guards but the prisoners themselves. Common criminals of the same
stripe as those who populate US prisons today committed many
villainies, particularly when they held positions of authority, and
fanatical Communists, highly organized to combat their many
political enemies among the inmates, eliminated their foes with
Stalinist ruthlessness. Two US Army investigators at Buchenwald, Egon
W. Fleck and Edward A. Tenenbaum, carefully investigated circumstances
in the camp before its liberation. In a detailed report submitted to
their superiors, they revealed, in the words of Alfred Toombs, their
commander, who wrote a preface to the report, "how the prisoners
themselves organized a deadly terror within the Nazi terror."
Fleck and Tenenbaum described the power exercised by criminals and
Communists as follows:
The trusties, who in time became almost exclusively Communist
Germans, had the power of life and death over all other inmates. They
could sentence a man or a group to almost certain death ... The
Communist trusties were directly responsible for a large part of the
brutalities at Buchenwald.
Colonel Donald B. Robinson, chief historian of the American military
government in Germany, summarized the Fleck-Tenenbaum report in an
article published in an American magazine shortly after the war.
Colonel Robinson wrote succinctly of the American investigators'
findings: "It appeared that the prisoners who agreed with the
Communists ate; those who didn't starved to death."
Additional corroboration of inmate brutality has been provided by
Ellis E. Spackman, who, as Chief of Counter-Intelligence Arrests and
Detentions for the US Seventh Army, was involved in the liberation of
Dachau. Spackman, later a professor of history at San Bernardino
Valley College in California, wrote in 1966 that at Dachau "the
prisoners were the actual instruments that inflicted the barbarities
on their fellow prisoners."
'Gas Chambers'
In December 1944 US Army officers Colonel Paul Kirk and Lt. Colonel
Edward J. Gully inspected the German concentration camp at
Struthof-Natzweiler in Alsace. They submitted their findings to their
superiors at the headquarters of the US 6th Army Group, which
subsequently forwarded their report to the US War Crimes Division.
While, significantly, the full text of their report has never been
published, it has been revealed, by a historian supportive of
Holocaust claims, that the two investigators were careful to
characterize equipment exhibited to them by French informants as a
"so-called lethal gas chamber," and to claim it was "allegedly used as
a lethal gas chamber." (Emphasis added)
Both the careful phraseology of the Natzweiler report, and its
effective suppression, stand in stark contrast to the credulity, the
confusion, and the blaring publicity that accompanied official reports
of alleged gas chambers at Dachau. At first, a US Army photo depicting
a GI gazing at a steel door marked with a skull and crossbones and the
German words for: "Caution! Gas! Mortal danger! Don't open!," was
identified as showing the murder weapon.
Later, however, it was evidently decided that the apparatus in
question was merely a standard delousing chamber for clothing, and
another alleged gas chamber, this one cunningly disguised as a shower
room, was exhibited to American congressmen and journalists as the
site where thousands breathed their last. While there exist numerous
reports in the press as to the operation of this second "gas chamber,"
no official report by trained Army investigators has yet surfaced to
reconcile such problems as the function of the shower heads: Were they
"dummies," or did lethal cyanide gas stream through them? (Each theory
has appreciable support in journalistic and
historiographical literature.)
As with Dachau, so with Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen, and the other camps
liberated by the Allies in western Germany. There was no end of
propaganda about "gas chambers," "gas ovens," and the like, but so far
not a single detailed description of the murder weapon and its
function, not a single report of the kind that is mandatory for the
successful prosecution of any assault or murder case in America at
that time and today, has come to light.
Furthermore, a number of Holocaust authorities have now publicly
decreed that there were no gassings, no extermination camps in Germany
after all. (We are now told that "gassing" and "extermination" camps
were located exclusively in what is now Poland, in areas captured by
the Soviet Red Army and made off-limits to western investigators.)
Dr. Martin Broszat of the Munich-based Institute for Contemporary
History, which is funded by the German government, stated
categorically in a 1960 letter to the German weekly Die Zeit: "Neither
in Dachau nor in Bergen-Belsen nor in Buchenwald were Jews or other
prisoners gassed." Professional "Nazi hunter" Simon Wiesenthal stated
in 1975 and again in 1993 that "there were no
extermination camps on German soil."
Dachau "gas chamber" No. 2, which was once presented to a stunned and
grieving world as a weapon that claimed hundreds of thousands of
lives, is now described in the brochure issued to tourists at the
modern Dachau "memorial site" in these words: "This gas chamber,
camouflaged as a shower room, was not used."
The Propaganda Intensifies
More than 50 years after American troops entered Dachau, Buchenwald
and other German camps, and trained American investigators established
the facts as to what had gone on in them, the government in
Washington, the entertainment media in Hollywood, and the print media
in New York continue to churn out millions of words and images
annually on the horrors of the camps and the infamy of the Holocaust.
Despite the fact that, with the exception of the defeated Confederacy,
no enemy of America has ever so suffered so complete and devastating
defeat as did Germany in 1945, the mass media and the politicians and
bureaucrats behave as if Hitler, his troops, and his concentration
camps continue to exist in an eternal present, and our opinion makers
continue to distort, through ignorance or malice, the facts about the
camps.
Time for the Truth
It is time that the government and the professional historians reveal
the facts about Dachau, Buchenwald and the other camps. It is time
they let the American public know how the inmates died, and how they
didn't die. It is time that the claims of mass murder by gassing are
clarified and investigated in the same manner as any other claims of
murder. It is time that the free ride certain groups have enjoyed as
the result of unchallenged Holocaust claims be terminated, just as it
is time to end the scapegoating of other groups, including Germans,
eastern Europeans, the
Roman Catholic hierarchy, and the wartime leadership of America and
Britain, either for their alleged role in the Holocaust or their
supposed failure to stop it.
Above all, it is time that the citizens of this great Republic have
the facts about the camps, facts they have a right to know, a right
that is fundamental to the exercise of their authority and their will
in the governance of their country. As citizens and as taxpayers,
Americans of all ethnic backgrounds, of all faiths, have a basic right
and an overriding interest in determining the facts of incidents that
are deemed by those in positions of power to be significant in
determining America's foreign and educational policy, as well as its
selection of past events to be memorialized in our
civic life.
Today the alleged facts of the Holocaust are at issue all over the
civilized world. The truth will be decided only by recourse to the
facts, in the public forum: not by concealing the facts, denying the
truth, stonewalling reality. The truth will out, and it is time the
government of this country, and governments and international bodies
throughout the world, make public the evidence of what actually
transpired in the German concentration camps in the years 1933-1945,
so that we may put paid to the lies, without fear or favor, and carry
out the work of reconciliation and renewal that is and must be the
granite foundation of mutual tolerance between peoples and of a peace
based on justice.
Summary
The conclusions of the early US Army investigations as to the truth
about the wartime German concentration camps have since been
corroborated by all subsequent investigators and can be summarized:
1.The harrowing scenes of dead and dying inmates were not the result
of a German policy of "extermination," but rather the result of
epidemics of typhus and other disease brought about largely by the
effects of Allied aerial attacks.
2.Stories of Nazi supercriminals and sadists who turned Jews and
others into handbags and lampshades for their private profit or
amusement were sick lies or diseased fantasies; indeed, the German
authorities punished corruption and cruelty on the part of camp
commanders and guards.
3.On the other hand, portrayals of the newly liberated inmates as
saints and martyrs of Hitlerism were quite often very far from the
truth; indeed, most of the brutalities inflicted on camp detainees
were the work of their fellow prisoners, in contravention of German
policy and German orders.
4.The alleged homicidal showers and gas chambers were used either for
bathing camp inmates or delousing their clothes; the claim that they
were used to murder Jews or other human beings is a contemptible
fabrication. Orthodox historians and professional "Nazi-hunters" have
quietly dropped claims that inmates were gassed at Dachau, Buchenwald
and other camps in Germany. They continue, however, to keep silent
regarding the lies about Dachau and Buchenwald, as well as to evade an
open discussion of the evidence for homicidal gassing at Auschwitz and
the
other camps captured by the Soviets.
Institute For Historical Review
Post Office Box 2739
Newport Beach, California 92659
>
> BZZZzzttt!!! The Holocaust was REAL. See above. (Do you believe
>that the sky is green, too?)
The Holocaust Cowing and Milking of Nations By Alex Linder
'Holocaust': The Means by Which the Richest Group in the World
Contrives to Cow and Milk the Rest of the Us in the Guise of Victims
who are Persecuted and Due Eternal Restitution.
Reading through a thousand blog reactions to Duke v Blitzer on CNN, a
generalization crystallizes. People confuse being told something six
million times with knowing something. They are not the same. "It ain't
what you don't know, it's what you know that just ain't so." The
average man 'knows' the Holocaust exists because:
1) everybody uses the term;
2) he has seen photos of stacked bodies;
3) he has read Anne Frank's book;
4) authorities agree that questioning any of this is 'hate.'
In other words, the average man believes in the Holocaust for no
logical reason, but out of simple mammalian conformity.
'Holocaust' is a loaded, dishonest term. You can't debate with
undefined terms without making a joke of yourself, but the average man
does not realize this. It is the part of public school, reinforced by
mass media, to disable his thinking so that he's worse positioned to
defend himself because he can't understand how he is manipulated to
accept the illogical. Debate in the mass media of a democracy is
nothing but the shuffling of loaded terms.
'Holocaust' is no ordinary noun. Rather, it is a loaded gun leveled at
the head of the West and the rest. Give them their money and their
pride of place or get your head and reputation blown off. You will
notice that never, ever does debate in the captive media condescend to
deconstruct the Zionist Privilege embodied in and sanctified by the
designer label 'Holocaust.' Worship the Zionists and submit to their
demands - that is what the term Holocaust means.
A demand for special privilege protected by a shell of pseudo-history;
that is an objective description of the term. The heart of the
'Holocaust,' taking at face value the term's pretension to historical
designation, is the claim that six million Jews were murdered by Nazi
Germany, most of them by gassing. The evidence for the gassing is
never discussed. Photos of crematories and bodies stacked like cord
wood are shown. No context or explanation of the reason for showing
them is given. The connection is to be assumed. But never is any
ordinary evidence, let alone proof, of the gassing allegation
advanced. That Jews were gassed is treated as though it were already
proved and therefore unquestionable, save by the depraved. Thus, the
practical job of the media and the well intentioned everyman is to
smear and ostracize anybody who argues against settled truth. We all
know that Jews were gassed, and that those who say otherwise are
deniers driven by hate. But it ain't so just because "everybody knows"
it is.
We are told repeatedly that the 'Holocaust' is both the worst thing
that ever happened and the best documented thing in human history. We
are to take these assertions on authority, since no genuine debate is
allowed.
There are men who can prove the 'Holocaust' is a Big Lie. You can find
them in jail. Their imprisonment is scarcely mentioned in the mass
media. Their imprisonment goes unlamented by the mass columnists. To
discuss these men and their work would endanger the Propa-sphere the
media construct. They must disappear. But we know, mass media. And
we're not going away. We're getting louder and stronger. And there's
nothing you can do to stop us.
>
>> ...has resulted in the payment of close to a hundred billion
>> dollars to Israel by the German government.
>
> IF so, GOOD. That doesn't even scratch the surface of the
>damage that the Nazis did to the Jews.
When Hitler came to power, Germany was hopelessly broke. The Treaty
of Versailles had imposed crushing reparations on the German people,
demanding that Germans repay every nation's cost of the (First World)
war. These costs totaled three times the value of all the property
in Germany.
Jewish currency speculators caused the German mark to plummet,
precipitating one of the worst runaway inflations in modern times. A
wheelbarrow full of 100 billion-mark banknotes could not buy a loaf of
bread. The national treasury was empty. Countless homes and farms
were lost to Jewish speculators and private banks. Germans lived in
hovels. They were starving.
Nothing like this had ever happened before - the total destruction of
the national currency, plus the wiping out of people's savings and
businesses. On top of all this came a global depression. Germany had
no choice but to succumb to debt slavery under international Jewish
bankers until 1933, when the National Socialists came to power. At
that point, the German government thwarted the international Jewish
banking cartels by issuing its own money. World Jewry responded by
declaring a global economic boycott of Germany.
Hitler began a national credit program by devising a plan of public
works that included flood control, repair of public buildings and
private residences, and construction of new roads, bridges, canals,
and port facilities. All these were paid for with money that no
longer came from the private international Jewish bankers.
The projected cost of these various programs was fixed at one billion
units of the national currency. To pay for this, the German
government issued bills of exchange, called Labor Treasury
Certificates. In this way, the National Socialists put people to
work.
Under the National Socialists, Germany's money wasn't backed by gold.
It was essentially a receipt for labor and materials delivered to the
government. Hitler said, "For every mark issued, we require the
equivalent of a mark's worth of work done, or goods produced." Workers
spent those Certificates on on other people's goods and services, thus
creating more jobs for more people. In this way, the German people
climbed out of the crushing debt imposed on them by the Jew bankers.
Within two years, the unemployment problem had been solved, and
Germany was back on it's feet. It had a solid, stable currency with
no debt, and no inflation, at a time when millions of people in the US
and other Western countries were still out of work. Within five
years, Germany went from being the poorest nation in Europe to the
richest!
Germany even managed to restore foreign trade, despite the global
boycott by Jew-owned enterprises, and the denial of foreign credit by
Jew-owned banks. Germany succeeded in this by exchanging equipment
and commodities directly with other countries, using a barter system
that cut the Jew bankers out of the picture. Germany flourished, since
barter eliminates national debt and trade deficits.
Germany's economic freedom was short-lived; but it left several
monuments, including the famous Autobahn, the world's first extensive
superhighway. This economic freedom made Hitler extremely popular with
the German people. Germany was rescued from English economic theory,
which says that all currency must be borrowed against the gold owned
by a private and secretive banking cartel - such as the Federal
Reserve, or the European Central Bank - rather than issued by the
government for the benefit of the people.
In "Billions For The Bankers, Debts For The People" (1984), Shelton
Emry commented:
"Germany issued debt-free and interest-free money from 1935 on, which
accounts for Germany's startling rise from the depression to a world
power in five years. The German government financed its entire
operations from 1935 to 1945 without gold, and without debt. It took
the entire Capitalist and Communist worlds to destroy the German
revolution, and bring Europe back under the heel of the Jewish
bankers."
>
> Let me guess. Someone dragged YOU, kicking and screaming, to
>buy tickets to those, right? Because if NOT, you have ZERO to whine
>about.
Jews controlling the media and corrupting minds is the main issue, and
what everyone should be talking about.
> Yeah. Because 6 MILLION of 'em were MURDERED!
Here is part of the Leuchter Report:
"Thirty-one samples were selectively removed from the alleged gas
chambers at Kremas I, II, III, IV and V. A control sample was taken
from delousing facility #1 at Birkenau. The control sample was removed
from a delousing chamber in a location where cyanide was known to have
been used and was apparently present as blue staining. Chemical
testing of the control sample #32 showed a cyanide content of 1050
mg/kg, a very heavy concentration. The conditions at areas from which
these samples were taken are identical with those of the control
sample, cold, dark, and wet. Only Kremas IV and V differed, in the
respect that these locations had sunlight (the buildings have been
torn down) and sunlight may hasten the destruction of uncomplexed
cyanide. The cyanide combines with the iron in the mortar and brick
and becomes ferric-ferro-cyanide or prussian blue pigmentation, a very
stable iron-cyanide complex.
"The locations from which the analyzed samples were removed are set
out in Table III.
"It is notable that almost all the samples were negative and that the
few that were positive were very close to the detection level
(1mg/kg); 6.7 mg/kg at Krema III; 7.9 mg/kg at Krerma I. The absense
of any consequential readings at any of the tested locations as
compared to the control sample reading 1050 mg/kg supports the
evidence that these facilities were not execution gas chambers. The
small quantities detected would indicate that at some point these
buildings were deloused with Zyklon B - as were all the buildings at
all these facilities"
>
>> FACT: Israel is the only Western country to legally sanction
>> torture, and the Israeli Defense Forces use bone-breaking and
>> shoot-to-maim policies against Palestinians, and even reporters.
>
> PROVE it!
"Having read most of the posts under the recent heading ' Are they
talking torture' I am amazed at the apparent naivety of most of those
posting.- Israel has been using all kinds of torturing methods for
decades, knowingly backed by the USA.
Within the last year there was an excellent program on Channel 4
England which looked in to the methods used in one infamous camp
called Khiam -- a snip below
(Palestinians arrested and 'interrogated' have been and are tortured
in one form or another. Although a place of such ghastly atrocities
that the Israeli government tried to deny it for many years, the
Khiam Detention and Interrogation Centre it maintained in Lebanon
from 1985-1999 during its occupation there is one of the most well
known (3, 4).) Unsnip.
The channel four programme was not easy to watch - from the many
methods described graphically, was that of the wives and children
being
tortured to make the prisoner confess, the TV team were at the now
closed camp - very atmospheric.
One search with Google, showing tens of thousands of different sites
will prove to him and anyone else that those in power must know.
A bit from one site =
Israel Shahak, head of the Israeli League for Human Rights, says:
"Slapping the face, beating the head against the wall, and beating
all parts of the body are common methods."
Victims are usually beaten by stick, boots, and gun butt all over the
body - on the head, limbs, stomach, genitals, accompanied by threats
of detaining or raping family members, or making them lose their
jobs.
But for Rhateb several other methods were used - he was wired up to
electrodes and bolts of high voltage current coursed agonizingly
through
his body. Later, he was hanged from the ceiling by one arm for hours.
After a few days, a man brought a water jug and told Rhateb that he
could drink as much as he wanted. However, acid was diluted in the
water and this caused him intense pain and severe burns.
The deprivation of basic necessities should also be considered as a
part of this torture; food and medical care are not provided and
sleeping is forbidden. Due to such methods, more than 500
Palestinian prisoners have died. More lucky ones suffer diseases
while others are maimed and physically disabled.
Last week, Amnesty International's annual report revealed that
Israeli forces arrested 1,200 Palestinians in 1997 for "security
reasons." Meanwhile, Israel also issued more than 1,900
administrative detention orders and detained 354 Palestinians at the
end of year.
Bear in mind, many of these people are not guilty of any crimes.
But just living on the wrong side in Palestine.
When doing a search just use the words ' Israel and torture', any way
round, you can also use 'camps'
John.
But isn't israel a "democracy"?"
John Bates
>
> EVERY American has the right to express his opinions, either
>formally or informally, pertaining to the Constitution.
>
> It can only be AMENDED upon consent of the VAST majority
>of Americans and their elected representatives.
>
> So your PARANOIA is noted, *along* with your being delusional.
>
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
Here is a quote from The Nameless War, by Captain A. H. M. Ramsay:
"The urgent alarm sounded in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke in his letter
to Mr. Balfour (see page 25), denouncing bolshevism as a Jewish plan,
which if not checked by the combined action of the European powers,
would engulf Europe and the world, was no exaggeration. By the end of
that year the red flag was being hoisted in most of the great cities
of Europe. In Hungary the Jew Bela Kuhn organized and maintained for
some time a merciless and bloody tyranny similar to the one in Russia.
In Germany the Jews, Liebknecht, Barth, Scheidemann, Rosa Luxemburg,
etc., made a desperate bid for power. These and other similar
convulsions shook Europe; but each country in its own way just
frustated the onslaughts.
In most countries concerned a few voices were raised in the
endeavour to expose the true nature of these evils. Only in one,
however, did a political leader and group arise, who grasped to the
full the significance of these happenings, and perceived behind the
mobs of native hooligans the organisation and driving power of world
Jewry. This leader was Adolf Hitler, and his group the National
Socialist Party of Germany.
Never before in history had any country not only repulsed organized
revolution, but discerned Jewry behind it, and faced up to that fact.
We need not wonder that the sewers of Jewish vituperation were flooded
over these men and their leader; nor should we make the mistake of
supposing that Jewry would stick at any lie to deter honest men
everywhere from making a thorough investigation of the facts for
themselves. Nevertheless, if any value liberty, and set out to seek
truth and defend it, this duty of personal investigation is one which
they cannot shirk.
To accept unquestioningly the lies and misrepresentaions of a
Jew-controlled or influenced press, is to spurn truth by sheer
idleness, if for no worse reason."
RHF
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 22:27:09 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Alfred Strom
>
>
> >I think you're getting on his nerves, Topaz. For whatever that's worth.
>
> >Most of the lunacy can be avoided, I suspect, by deleting the
> >Limbaugh group when you post or reply.
>
> >Faithfully,
>
> >Kevin Alfred Strom.
- There could be some decent but misguided people
- on Limbaugh groups.
Oops - Who View 'you' as being really Misguided.
http://hinessight.blogs.com/.a/6a00d83451c0aa69e20134867d5d5d970c-320wi
- Anyway the lunatics don't bother me.
Yeah - Sort of like Looking in the Mirror.
http://www.mirrotek.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/3vu1448b.jpg
- They can foam at the mouth all they want
- and I couldn't care less.
That is until They BITE 'You'
-or 'You' Bite Them . . .
_ _ _ GRrrrr RAHaaaa !
http://www.halloweencostumes4u.com/Merchant2/graphics/00000003/4474.jpg
we have met the enemy and . . .
he/they are us - eafpal ~ RHF
http://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/Pogo2.jpg
.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:
>> To whatever varying extents that may be true, that only
>> shows that those countries contained 'WAY to many loons who
>> were as IGNORANT as YOU are.
> What is more likely, there is something wrong with all other people,
> or there is something wrong with Jews?
Well.... no.
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote:
<flush swill>
___________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Do not feed the |
/ O O\ | trolls. Thank you. |
/ \ | --Mgt. |
/ \ \|__________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\__/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _ ||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |__ _ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org>
The China Blue Lagoon <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> (¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <http://www.TravelForPay.org> wrote:
> Never try to teach a neo-nazi pig to debate. It wastes your time
> and teaches nothing to the pig.
That is VERY true!!
And we who constantly expose the FALLACIES of mindless bigots
harbor no illusions that they are educable.
It is to EXPOSE their stupidity by countering them with FACTS that
the fence-sitters can see -- to help the latter to decide to REJECT
their agendas.
Topaz
<http://www.TravelForPay.org>" <x...@v.com> wrote:
>> What is more likely, there is something wrong with all other people,
>> or there is something wrong with Jews?
>
> Well.... no.
>
http://www.solarcross.com/behindcom.htm
Expelled
The Fourth Lateran Council restricted Jewish commercial advantage but
it did not end the Jewish problem. Beginning in the latter part of the
13th century, one European country after another expelled its Jewish
population as the only final solution to the problem. First to take
the step was England which banned them in 1290. Fifteen years later in
1306 the French followed suit. In steady succession the various states
of Europe emulated this example with Spain being one of the last to
enforce the ban in 1492. The situation in Spain is worth noting. Says
Encyclopedia Britannica: [page 57, vol. 13 - 1947]: "... The 14th
century was the golden age of their history in Spain. In 1391 the
preaching of a priest of Seville, Fernando Martinez, led to the first
general massacre of the Jews who were envied for their prosperity and
hated because they were the king's tax collectors." Ferdinand and
Isabella, after uniting Spain and driving out the Moors turned their
attention to the Jewish problem, with the result that they were
evicted completely in 1492. In 1498 Portugal evicted its Jewish
population also.
The Exploiters
A great deal has been said about the "persecution" of the Jews in
Europe and elsewhere, and they have pretty well convinced the world
(or at least Americans) that these hardships were inflicted on an
innocent people. But these rich Spanish Jews we see being evicted in
1492 were not down-trodden folk. They were the wealthy, the
privileged, the exploiters: they were the well-fed merchants and the
gouging tax collectors ...
So it was in Portugal; in that country we find that the deportation of
the Jews ... "deprived Portugal of its middle class and its most
scientific traders and financiers." [Encyclopedia Britannica, page
279, vol. 18 - 1947.] Undeniably this class of traders and financiers
was put to hardship by this banishment, but it does not follow that
they were victims of discrimination in the accepted sense, nor were
they underprivileged in any way. Rather we see a wealthy merchant
group being ousted from its seat of vested privilege by a thoroughly
outraged, and a thoroughly exploited Christian society ...
The situation in England was similar. The Jews had come to England in
the wake of the Norman conquest and had quickly gained a position of
wealth and prosperity. Says Valentine's Jewish Encyclopedia of this
period: "Their numbers and prosperity increased, Aaron of Lincoln
being the wealthiest man in England in his time ... his financial
transactions covering the whole country and concerning many of the
leading nobles and churchmen ... On his death his property passed to
the crown and a special branch of the exchequer had to be created to
deal with it."
England
England, ironically enough, was the last country to be invaded by the
Jews and the first to evict them. After the Fourth Lateran Council the
Jews had become increasingly difficult to deal with and there were a
number of anti-Jewish riots. Perplexed by the problem posed by this
alien minority which seemed well on its way to corralling the
kingdom's wealth, and failing in an attempt to force its assimilation.
Edward I confiscated all Jewish wealth and evicted them permanently in
1290. Not until 1655 was a Jew legally permitted to re-enter England.
Britain thus established the precedent for the later eviction which
soon followed on the continent.
France
In France too the Jews were dominant in trade and finance and had been
since before Charlemagne's time. Under Philip the Fair (1285-1314) one
of the last, and certainly one of the greatest of the Capetian line,
France had become the greatest power in Europe. It was Philip's need
for money which led him to seize Jewish wealth and drive them from the
country. He had already before 1306 taken desperate measures to raise
money, which was in short supply, by forbidding the export of gold and
silver from France. The same need for money brought him into conflict
with the Templars, whose wealth he also seized. But it was the Jews
who controlled the greatest supply of floating wealth. In 1306 Philip
solved his financial problem-and France's Jewish problem-by
expropriating their wealth and evicting them. Thus ended the
centuries-long commercial dominance of the Jew in France. Later a few
were permitted to return and these were in turn ejected in 1394.
RETURN TO THE EAST
The Evictions
Space does not permit a detailed discussion of the other evictions
which followed and which resulted in the banishment of the Jews from
virtually every country in Western Europe in the succeeding centuries
but here in chronological order is a list of the evictions:
ENGLAND: Jews expelled in 1290 by Edward I. Not permitted to re-enter
till 1655.
FRANCE: Expelled in 1306 by Philip the Fair. A few were permitted to
return but were again evicted in 1394. Jewish settlements remained in
Bordeaux, Avignon, Marseilles, (from where they were evicted in 1682)
and in the northern province of Alsace.
SAXONY: Expelled in 1349.
HUNGARY: By 1092 the Jews were in control of Hungary's tax
collections. In 1360 they were expelled but later returned. In 1582
they were again expelled from the Christian part of Hungary.
BELGIUM: Expelled in 1370. A few settled there again in 1450, but no
large numbers came till 1700.
SLOVAKIA: Ousted from Prague in 1380. Many settled there again after
1562. In 1744 Marie Theresa expelled them again.
AUSTRIA: Expelled in 1420 by Albrecht V.
NETHERLANDS: Expelled from Utrecht in 1444.
SPAIN: Expelled in 1492.
LITHUANIA: Expelled in 1495 by Grand Duke Alexander. They later
returned.
PORTUGAL: Expelled in 1498.
PRUSSIA: Expelled in 1510.
ITALY: Expelled from Kingdom of Naples and Sardinia in 1540.
BAVARIA: Banned permanently in 1551.
Jews were not permitted to enter Sweden until 1782. None were
permitted to enter Denmark before the 17th century and they were not
allowed in Norway after 1814. Today only a handful reside in all
Scandinavia.
Back to Poland
By 1500 all of Western Europe except northern Italy, parts of Germany,
and the Papal possessions around Avignon, had been rid of the Jewish
invasion. For a while, at least, Europe was free of the Jews; not
until 1650 did they return in any numbers. Says Encyclopedia
Britannica: [page 57-58, vol. 13 - 1947.] "The great mass of the
Jewish people were thus to be found once more in the East, in the
Polish and Turkish empires . . The few communities suffered to remain
in western Europe were meanwhile subjected at last to all the
restrictions which earlier ages had usually allowed to remain as an
ideal; so that in a sense, the Jewish dark ages may be said to begin
with the Renaissance."
THE RENAISSANCE
As the Jew Departed ...
The period marked by the evictions-1300 to 1650-also marks the period
of the Renaissance which broke over Europe as the Jews departed.
Starting at first in the trading cities of northern Italy in about
1300, there began a great rebirth of culture and learning which at
first was based almost entirely on the writings of the ancient Greeks
and Romans. Very quickly this renascent culture spread over Europe and
when the age had ended, in about 1650, Europe was by comparison with
her former status, enlightened and civilized. Quite obviously all this
could not have taken place had it not been for a great upsurge of
commercial activity which occurred simultaneously with, and as an
adjunct of, the Renaissance. Not until the nations of Europe had
wrested commercial control from the ghetto did this rebirth of western
civilization occur.
Topaz
Here is a quote from Mein Kampf:
"The fight which Fascist Italy waged against Jewry's three
principal weapons, the profound reasons for which may not have been
consciously understood (though I do not believe this myself) furnishes
the best proof that the poison fangs of that Power which transcends
all State boundaries are being drawn, even though in an indirect way.
The prohibition of Freemasonry and secret societies, the suppression
of the supranational Press and the definite abolition of Marxism,
together with the steadily increasing consolidation of the Fascist
concept of the State--all this will enable the Italian Government, in
the course of some years, to advance more and more the interests of
the Italian people without paying any attention to the hissing of the
Jewish world-hydra.
"The English situation is not so favorable. In that country
which has 'the freest democracy' the Jew dictates his will, almost
unrestrained but indirectly, through his influence on public opinion."