"...From each according to his ability, to each according to his need..."

vict0r

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 2:58:25 PM11/10/09

to

nothin wrong with that

right?

Lamont Cranston

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 3:46:50 PM11/10/09

to

vict0r wrote:
> nothin wrong with that
>
> right?

irrelevant

vict0r

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 3:44:29 PM11/10/09

to

you're response is like taking the fifth amendment

orsobubu

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 5:57:05 PM11/10/09

to

On 10 Nov, 20:58, "vict0r" <l...@oocom.netb> wrote:
> nothin wrong with that
>
> right?

it will be a reality only when man will make the transition from
capitalism to a more advanced production system; but this will require
high doses of violence and a revolution; how are you organizing
yourselves in US in order to achieve that?

Dänk 1010011010

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 11:59:38 PM11/10/09

to

Who is willing to die fighting for a new economic system that has
never even been tried? And who is to say this new advanced production
system won't turn out to be an even bigger disaster than communism?

Capitalism may have flaws, but it is familiar and well-tested. All
you seem to offer is hope that a new system will work better than
capitalism, which amounts to a religious belief on your part. More
people have died in the name of religion (and communism is also a
religion) than for any other cause.

Tater Gumfries

unread,

Nov 11, 2009, 12:06:42 AM11/11/09

to

No it ain't. Your analogy is bullshit.

Tater

orsobubu

unread,

Nov 11, 2009, 5:14:13 AM11/11/09

to

> Who is willing to die fighting

october revolution had only one death, by a stroke! the totality of
deaths, i.e. during paris commune and before/after red october,
occurred by counter-revolutionaries capitalist forces: world wars,
civil wars, terrorism, police and secret services atttacks.

> for a new economic system that has
> never even been tried? And who is to say this new advanced production

more than 8 centuries ago, some visionary men, supported by rising
market needs, did not ask themselves these coward questions, they
sticked with their dream for a new order and after 7 centuries they
changed the world. Other visionary men, starting 2 centuries ago, are
dreaming and working for a new world too, because growing powerful
economic forces cannot be peacefully organized by a limited
capitalism

> system won't turn out to be an even bigger disaster than communism?

communism never existed. communism IS the future order. what you call
communism is state capitalism.
you can start studying amadeo bordiga's works about capitalism in
soviet union.

> Capitalism may have flaws, but it is familiar and well-tested. All
> you seem to offer is hope that a new system will work better than
> capitalism, which amounts to a religious belief on your part. More
> people have died in the name of religion (and communism is also a
> religion) than for any other cause.

I repeat you, all that deads were consequence of imperialistic wars,
and imperialism is the current stage of capitalism. about religion,
capitalism economic theories are "religious", because broadly non-
scientific and contradictory (you can learn all about them in any
political economy text); communism theory (dialectical materialism) is
totally scientific, and has predicted an astounding number of storic
events, including these years overproduction global crisis. It also
predicts that, starting from now, world conflicts and crisis will
worsen fastly and deadly.

Stormin Mormon

unread,

Dec 18, 2009, 3:00:59 PM12/18/09

to

They tried it, the Pilgrims. Research "thanksgiving hoax" at
Mises.org and see how it worked, in the new world.

--
Christopher A. Young
Learn more about Jesus
www.lds.org
.

"vict0r" <l...@oocom.netb> wrote in message
news:DCjKm.162808$Gs....@en-nntp-01.dc1.easynews.com...