Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Hey, rightards, guess what? The Democrats' health bill has PASSED!!

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Harry Hope

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:10:53 AM11/8/09
to

Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?

Harry

Harry Hope

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:14:04 AM11/8/09
to
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:10:53 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com>
wrote:

>
>Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
>Harry

Or better still, how about a wet teabag?

Harry

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:19:29 AM11/8/09
to
> >Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?

> Or better still, how about a wet teabag?

Does the bill include mental health care for suicidal rightards?


Bret Cahill

Prejean's Nookie

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:28:37 AM11/8/09
to

"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:cf0654d0-a88d-4a43...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...

Not for repugs who tied this bill up for 50 years.


Killing, Inc.

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:33:08 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> Harry

220-215???
How utterly pathetic.
That's the best you fascists could do?
Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
vote with them. LOL
This bill is DOA in the Senate.

I laugh at you and piss in your general direction.

Have a nice day.

buzz

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:42:13 AM11/8/09
to
Harry Hope wrote:
> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> Harry

Save your tissues for the Senate vote, not likely pass in the Senate.

Barack Hussein Obama...MMM MMM MMM
Send HIM to Afghanistan to fight Osama...MMM MMM MMM

Simple-minded dummycrats (the party that birthed the KKK) and
liberals...morons electing morons.

squirltok

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 1:24:02 AM11/8/09
to

Killing, Inc. wrote:
> On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
> >
> > Harry
>
> 220-215???
> How utterly pathetic.
> That's the best you fascists could do?
> Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
> vote with them. LOL
> This bill is DOA in the Senate.

You know what? Democrats enjoy the freedom to do what they want. My
guess, is the Democrats that voted against this are being fed $$$$ by
the lobbyists interests. But
regardless being a Democrat doesn't mean you owe your political life
to the party.

Prejean's Nookie

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:25:36 AM11/8/09
to

"buzz" <bu...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:hd5lno$6ch$1...@news.eternal-september.org...

> Harry Hope wrote:
>> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>>
>> Harry
>
> Save your tissues for the Senate vote, not likely pass in the Senate.

So sez this guy, Buzz: http://snipurl.com/t4vds


Winston Smith, American Patriot

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 6:20:26 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 7:33 am, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> > Harry
>
> 220-215???
> How utterly pathetic.
> That's the best you fascists could do?
> Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
> vote with them. LOL

Kucinich voted NO because the bill was not "socialist" enough, right-
wing scum. The motivations of other no-voting Democrats have not
fully been made public.

> This bill is DOA in the Senate.

Then the 2010 and 2012 elections will certainly be interesting. 2010
will also bring about re-districting!!! If you're a naysayer in a
close-count or soon-to-be close-count district, the last word that
will apply to you is "incumbent."

> I laugh at you and piss in your general direction.
>
> Have a nice day.

Who is not able to judge the sincerity of your last sentence against
the one just prior to it?

Killing, Inc.

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 7:06:23 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 5:20 am, "Winston Smith, American Patriot"

<mavigoz...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 7:33 am, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > > Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> > > Harry
>
> > 220-215???
> > How utterly pathetic.
> > That's the best you fascists could do?
> > Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
> > vote with them. LOL
>
> Kucinich voted NO because the bill was not "socialist" enough, right-
> wing scum.  The motivations of other no-voting Democrats have not
> fully been made public.

Ah yes Kucinich. I'm surprised Obammy hasn't appointed him czar of
gummy bears, sunshine, and rainbows.
Denny boy is the heart and soul of the democrat party; he represents
the way most of the party wishes it could vote if they wouldn't lose
their offices in a heartbeat.
Socialist scumbag democrat ideas are antiquated and out of touch with
real America that they belong in the 1960's and in another country.
Try Venezuela.

> > This bill is DOA in the Senate.
>
> Then the 2010 and 2012 elections will certainly be interesting.  2010
> will also bring about re-districting!!!  If you're a naysayer in a
> close-count or soon-to-be close-count district, the last word that
> will apply to you is "incumbent."

THAT will apply both ways. Considering the political leanings of the
districts where your blue dogs are, you better hope and pray they
voted against the bill, or say goodbye to your control of the House.

Have a nice day.

JayPee Vee

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 9:54:08 AM11/8/09
to
On 8 Nov., 06:33, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> > Harry
>
> 220-215???
> How utterly pathetic.
> That's the best you fascists could do?
> Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
> vote with them. LOL

As opposed to facist republicans who ALL voted against them.
At least, it's now clear who hates the USA.

Kevin Cunningham

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:24:59 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 12:33 am, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com>
wrote:

We just needed one vote more than you scum had. Hurts to get beat
doesn't it?

Kevin Cunningham

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:29:16 AM11/8/09
to

And in Europe, which has had nationalized medical care since the early
50's they live longer. Simple, Europeans have better health care
than we do. The proof? They live longer. They have fewer dead
babies, happier people.

But don't let the facts bother you.....

Daniel

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:03:17 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 12:10 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?


Why? Democrats just committed political suicide by ignoring the will
of the people.

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:52:31 PM11/8/09
to
Harry Hope wrote:
> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> Harry

Why cry about the idiocy of 220 people.


The trick will be to get them smarter or get them out of any place of
importance.


Dave Heil

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 1:39:25 PM11/8/09
to

Facts? They are *happier people*? You just manufactured a "fact".

liberal2

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:16:56 PM11/8/09
to

Ummm, the Senate is where the real problem exists.

Besides, half of a good plan is only a bad plan....we need "Medicare-
for-all".

liberal2

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:22:42 PM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 6:20 am, "Winston Smith, American Patriot"

You left out the brilliance and humanity of his screen nym. As
someone else once observed: "Somewhere, a village has lost its idiot."
Imagine some poor woman married to this putz.

Steve

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:23:58 PM11/8/09
to
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:16:56 -0800 (PST), liberal2
<libera...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>On Nov 8, 12:14�am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:10:53 -0500, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> >Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>>
>> >Harry
>>
>> Or better still, how about a wet teabag?
>>
>> Harry
>
>Ummm, the Senate is where the real problem exists.

Not to mention getting the merged bill past the blue dogs in the house
again... This is a long way from being a done deal...

>Besides, half of a good plan is only a bad plan....we need "Medicare-
>for-all".

--

Contrary to what liberals are whining, nobody
owes you anything.

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:29:35 PM11/8/09
to
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com> wrote in
news:5c6ef5dhdslruqaqd...@4ax.com:

They will really be whining when the bill comes due in the form of crushing
tax increases down the line for this and all the other Obamastration fiscal
escesses

bvallely

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:38:40 PM11/8/09
to
.

> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
.
> Harry

In the middle of a Saturday night, without Americans being allowed to
read what's in the 2000 page encyclopedia of legal jargon.

Pretty much the same Modus Operandi used to get the Stimulus Bill
through.

You know how happy you were when the Stimulus Bill passed, and now
you're in the awkward position of defending double digit unemployment?

Imagine being in that same position if Pelosi Care passes - only this
time, millions of Americans die for no reason whatsoever.

If this bill passes, it will be the end of the Democrat Party.

bvallely

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:40:50 PM11/8/09
to
.
> > Or better still, how about a wet teabag?
.

> Does the bill include mental health care for suicidal rightards?
.
And that's all this means to you? A way to piss people off?

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:05:31 PM11/8/09
to
> .> > Or better still, how about a wet teabag?

> > Does the bill include mental health care for suicidal rightards?

> And that's all this means to you?  A way to piss people off?

Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
desperately need. What more do you want?


Bret Cahill


pbj

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:22:47 PM11/8/09
to

Is that anything like the political suicide they were committing last
November by running a black man for President?

John Q Public

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:39:10 PM11/8/09
to

No its the political suicide of pretending to be centrist (Which got em
elected) and
governing from the left (Which is gonna get em unemployment!)

BTW, it was the leftwing pundits who had their little racist asses
proclaiming this, not
the Republicans

bvallely

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:53:18 PM11/8/09
to
.
> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> desperately need.  
.
You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill? Of
course you don't - it's a dismal failure which has actually destroyed
three million jobs at the cost of a trillion dollars.

Well, if you guys skunk through PelosiCare in the middle of the night
with no Republican support, the result will be the Stimulus Bill times
a thousand. Right now, America has the finest medical system in the
world, and Americans will watch it desolve before our eyes.

There's a very good reason while PelosiCare doesn't start until after
the 2012 election. This bill will destroy the Democrat Party.

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:09:04 PM11/8/09
to
> .> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> > desperately need.  

What more do you want? A chocolate on your pillow?

> You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill?  

The GOP tax cut recession would be far worse without it.

But now that you changed the issue to issue dodging:

www.bretcahill.com


Clairbear

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:18:20 PM11/8/09
to
bvallely <bval...@aol.com> wrote in news:33e12549-7424-498d-9c11-
c3e181...@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com:

Frankly those who voted for this do not care about the will of the people
or the people themselves they and most of the liberals inhabiting the NGs
are just DNC lickspittles.
They havea vested interest in kepping the populous beholden to the
government as a result They don't give a crap about unemployment, rapidily
rising energy costs(ergo we have cap and trade), and much of the other
social ills that they costantly try to lay off on the Republicans. Woking
peopel are what make the ecomy work nor government handouts and baalouts

Every time

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:30:34 PM11/8/09
to
>>>>And in Europe, which has had nationalized medical care since the early
50's they live longer. Simple, Europeans have better health care
than we do. The proof? They live longer.

It's got nothing to do with health care, and a lot to do with diet.
Europeans don't eat the craps that Americans do, so they get less
cancer, heart disease, etc.

But Take a look at this list.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_life_expectancy

Men in those countries above the USA die at about the same age as USA
men. It's the women that have the longer life expectancy and bring the
average up.. Which is an interesting statistic in itself, actually.
But again, that's all about diet, too.

Harry

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:47:08 PM11/8/09
to
Since the Medicare cuts won't kick in until 2013, she
may even live long enough to even vote in 2012.

Killing, Inc.

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 6:31:20 PM11/8/09
to

I wouldn't know. We've been beating you Stalinist democretins all
week, and since you'll never get this bill past the Senate (or the
House again in a compromise bill), any sane person would look at your
predicament and consider your Jackass party pretty much fucked.

Have a nice day.

Killing, Inc.

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 6:40:20 PM11/8/09
to

Not to worry. This bill is doomed to failure from here on out. I
wonder if the Democretins will thank us for saving them, their party,
and America from the most collossal fuckup of their party's entire
existence.
Nah, they're scum who don't deserve any of the freedoms they take for
granted and we protect for them. Fuck em.

wy

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 6:43:46 PM11/8/09
to

Why don't you get back to us when you actually win some senate or
house races? Governors mean nothing in the big picture of things.
Obama won with the 2 Dem senators he got. The truth hurts, don't it?

bvallely

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 7:15:15 PM11/8/09
to
.

> > .> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> > > desperately need.  
.

> What more do you want?  A chocolate on your pillow?
.
Excuse me, but YOU wrote the statement you've just snidely dismissed.
I agree in was a childish quip which richly deserves contempt, but
still....
.

> > You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill?  
.

> The GOP tax cut recession would be far worse without it. >
.
THAT'S your cutting retort? Really? Wow, that is lame, isn't it?
Nobody who isn't an out and out moron actually believes the stimulus
bill is anything but an unmitigated disaster.

It certainly must have been fun to scream "Bush lied, people died",
wasn't it? Every day, there was a new Bushism, and you got to feel
like a free thinker just be agreeing with all your lefty friends. Now
you're stuck defending a group of incompetent fools,

This is the reason that the Democrats saw a twenty point drop in New
Jersey and Virgina. Double digit unemployment, and the refusal of
Obama to do anything to turn those numbers around.


Killing, Inc.

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 7:34:35 PM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 5:43 pm, wy <w...@myself.com> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 6:31 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 8, 8:54 am, JayPee Vee <jaypee1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On 8 Nov., 06:33, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 7, 11:10 pm, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> > > > > Harry
>
> > > > 220-215???
> > > > How utterly pathetic.
> > > > That's the best you fascists could do?
> > > > Democretin so-called leaders can't even get their own party members to
> > > > vote with them. LOL
>
> > > As opposed to facist republicans who ALL voted against them.
> > > At least, it's now clear who hates the USA.
>
> > I wouldn't know. We've been beating you Stalinist democretins all
> > week, and since you'll never get this bill past the Senate (or the
> > House again in a compromise bill), any sane person would look at your
> > predicament and consider your Jackass party pretty much fucked.
>
> > Have a nice day.
>
> Why don't you get back to us when you actually win some senate or
> house races?  

THAT is coming very soon. Too bad for you.
Why don't you just shut the fuck up until your leaders actually
accomplish something.

Have a nice day.

squirltok

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 7:37:42 PM11/8/09
to

everything 'will' destroy the democratic party, it's been happening
for decades

squirltok

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 7:38:12 PM11/8/09
to

yep, it's perpetual death and destruction in their minds, it never ends

wy

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 8:30:07 PM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 7:34 pm, "Killing, Inc." <i.am.killing....@gmail.com> wrote:

Oh, pooh-pooh to you too. I don't know if you understand this about
democracy, but if there's a two-party system, sometimes one party
wins, other times the other party wins. That's the way it works. You
can't always have the same party running the show, because, well, that
would be just downright undemocratic. You had your eight years, now
it's the other guy's turn to have his. Ying and yang, or is that too
Chinese for you?


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:24:18 PM11/8/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDA5DFF...@198.186.192.136:

Modern Conservative: Someone who can take time out
from blocking attempts to raise the minimum wage
and blocking extensions of unemployment benefits
and subsidizing the exporting of jobs to pretend
they really care about working people.

Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:35:37 PM11/8/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDA5DFF...@198.186.192.136:

> bvallely <bval...@aol.com> wrote in news:33e12549-7424-498d-9c11-


"havea"?

"kepping"?

"costantly"?

"woking"?

"peopel"?

"ecomy"?

"baalouts"?


Dang, dude. Drinking and posting at the same time
isn't working for you. And at 3:18 in the afternoon,
no less. Perhaps you should get a hobby or something?


Limpball's Nookie

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:50:29 PM11/8/09
to

"bvallely" <bval...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5e905071-95b7-4fbb...@12g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

It certainly must have been fun to scream "Bush lied, people died",
wasn't it?
---------------------

Wasn't it you who said, "Bush is gone"?


Clairbear

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:05:40 PM11/8/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDD9C428EF3...@216.196.97.130:

Fallacious reasoning prove little on your part, mitchie, other than you
are better at post pics than logic skills
>
>
>
>
>
>

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:10:05 PM11/8/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDDBAF9CBB9...@216.196.97.130:

Wrong yet again, mitchie I do not do the alcohol or drug thing I just
happen be less than perfect with typing skills at times But then who
died an left you the job of english perfessor of the usenet

Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:17:46 PM11/8/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBDEBAFB981Cclairbear@
198.186.192.136:


Since your posts are usually properly composed and this
one is wreck that a 5th grader would not post it only stands
to reason that you were impaired. Really, it is OK for you
to tell us the reason for your obvious lapse.

Were you a victim of home schooling, perhaps?


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:24:56 PM11/8/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBDEAF052C1Fclairbear@
198.186.192.136:


Yes, we all know you lurk the binary groups to
grab images posted by others while contributing
nothing yourself. Parasites are generally praised
in Republican circles. But why do you compound it by
pretending to care about issues (unemployment, the
deficit, etc) that were non-issues when Republicans
ruled the roost?

Is that sort of hypocrisy suddenly fashionable
with the Tea-bagging set?

The parents here are the culprits!"
Rush Limbaugh on teenage pregnancy,
at least when it comes to Jamie Spears.
But not, it seems, Bristol Palin, 12/19/07


Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:50:41 PM11/8/09
to
> .> > .> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> > > > desperately need.  

> > What more do you want?  A chocolate on your pillow?

> Excuse me, but YOU wrote the statement you've just snidely dismissed.

Yes and it was so excellent I'll write it again:

Look, I'm trying to get you rightards the mental health treatment you
so desperately need.


. . .


> .> > You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill?  

> > The GOP tax cut recession would be far worse without it.

> THAT'S your cutting retort?  

Did you want to discuss the high tax Clinton economic boom and Repugs
becoming so enraged by the balanced the budget they impeached Clinton
for it?

. . .

> Nobody who isn't an out and out moron actually believes the stimulus
> bill is anything but an unmitigated disaster.

Obama saved the country from a 1930s style depression.

> It certainly must have been fun to scream "Bush lied, people died",
> wasn't it?  

Not nearly as fun as during the high tax Clinton economic boom when
Repugs were preoccupied with Clinton's penis.

> Every day, there was a new Bushism,

The corp. media put him on the air every day when it was obvious he
never had anything to say. Cheney was running everything anyway.

> and you got to feel
> like a free thinker just be agreeing with all your lefty friends.  Now
> you're stuck defending a group of incompetent fools,
>
> This is the reason that the Democrats saw a twenty point drop in New
> Jersey

It was a 5 pt loss in NJ.

> and Virgina.  

The Democrats didn't run anyone in VA.

< Double digit unemployment, and the refusal of
> Obama to do anything to turn those numbers around.

The recession is over. All we need to do now is make sure the
unemployed get a little income -- something Repugs are fighting tooth
and nail.


Bret Cahill

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 9:24:44 AM11/9/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDE2D518DEC...@216.196.97.130:

Frankly if you have nothing else to be critical of other than a few
spelling errors then you must be unable to find fault with facts So do
the world a favor a just post pics else where and go back to being just
a lurker here
>
>
>
>

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 9:40:55 AM11/9/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBDE40BF7237...@216.196.97.130:

So stop posting ifyou don't want other to see you images purloined for
other sources I post photos that are my original work So When it comes
to your "holier than thou" act it seems to be another of your canards
beacuse you cannot refut truth


>But why do you compound it by
> pretending to care about issues (unemployment, the
> deficit, etc) that were non-issues when Republicans
> ruled the roost?

Unemployment has become an issue for everyone since the dems took
control of congress some 3 years ago and has continued to grow despite
Obama's promise to stop it's growth at 8.5% with his porkulus and all
those "shovel ready" jobs


> Is that sort of hypocrisy suddenly fashionable
> with the Tea-bagging set?

Seems abusive rudeness has become fashoinable with libs like you. Funny
how when libs, minorities and other non right wing groups use their
right to public assembly to voice their opinions you praise them as if
they were the very messengers of God. Talk about Hypocrisy. Both dems
and repubs have been guilty of hypocrisy more times than anyone can
count and it has existed though out the history of both parties You and
your ilk are just hopelessly myopic about the American body politic
among otherthings. Libs like you are not alone there are many just like
you on the extreme right to.

bvallely

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 1:42:03 PM11/9/09
to
On Nov 8, 8:50 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > .> > .> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> > > > > desperately need.  
.

> > > What more do you want?  A chocolate on your pillow?
> > Excuse me, but YOU wrote the statement you've just snidely dismissed.
.
> Yes and it was so excellent I'll write it again:
.
If you believed the statement to be "so excellent", why did you insult
your own words? Is it that you have a little first hand experience
with the mental health house of many doors?

.
> > .> > You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill?  >
.

> > > The GOP tax cut recession would be far worse without it.
> > THAT'S your cutting retort?  
.

> Did you want to discuss the high tax Clinton economic boom and Repugs
> becoming so enraged by the balanced the budget ....>
.
Be glad too. The economy was so bad during the first two years of the
Clinton administration that the Democrats lost the House and Senate in
1994. Newt and the Republican Congress turned the economy around.
Clinton wisely embraced supplyside economics and saved his presidency.

I don't believe this is an option for Obama. Frankly, his ego is too
huge to ever admit, even to himself, that he's wrong about anything.
Besides, Obama is nowhere near as smart or charming as Clinton.

In a way, Obama has been a God Sent to the Republicans. Reagan took
down the Communists, and reduced taxes to a manageable level.
.
>....they impeached Clinton for it?>
.
No, the Republicans impeached Clinton for breaking the law - in fact,
a law that he himself had signed. (The Violence Against Women Act of
1996).

But then, Clinton is a Democrat, and the law doesn't apply to powerful
Democrats, does it. Did you know that a few days ago, Barney Frank
was caught at a pot party with his boyfriend? Of course you didn't.
Barney Frank is a Democrat, and the laws don't apply to powerful
Democrats.


.
> > Nobody who isn't an out and out moron actually believes the stimulus
> > bill is anything but an unmitigated disaster.
.
> Obama saved the country from a 1930s style depression.

.
How? By deliberately shoving the unemployment rate into double
digits? By bankrupting the country?
.
"One must never waste a good crisis."
Rahl Emanualle


.
> > It certainly must have been fun to scream "Bush lied, people died",
> > wasn't it?  

.


> Not nearly as fun as during the high tax Clinton economic boom when
> Repugs were preoccupied with Clinton's penis.

.
And it, it was Democrats who endlessly screamed about Clinton's dick.
You were outraged about invading a man's private life. However, when
Mark Folly and Larry Craig's sex lives were spread across the paper,
THAT didn't bother you much.

Sarah Palin's teen-aged daughters were called whores on the David
Letterman show. Where was your outrage then?

Joe the Plumber had his family and tax records spread on the evening
news for having the gall to ask Obama an actual question.

Jerry Ryan had the salacious details of her divorce to Senator Ryan
spread across the evening news, because Obama wanted Senator Ryan's
seat.

Prejean was vilely attacked for daring to ask a question on the Ms.
USA pageant. Now the left is spreading rumors about an imaginary sex
tape.

The left has gotten away with this behavior for, well, decades. For
some reason, the Democrats believe that it's a good idea to piss off
the Republicans. A large minority of Democrats are incapable of
mounting an argument without leaning in vulgar personal attacks.

Well, congrats. You've succeeded. You've royally pissed off the
conservatives in this country. We represent 40% of Americans. You've
also disgusted most independents.


.
> > Every day, there was a new Bushism,

.


> The corp. media put him on the air every day when it was obvious he
> never had anything to say. >

.
Yes, whenever Bush made a verbal gaff, that was front page news.
.


>Cheney was running everything anyway.>

.
I'd far rather have him run the country than Biden or Obama.
,


> > and you got to feel
> > like a free thinker just be agreeing with all your lefty friends.  Now
> > you're stuck defending a group of incompetent fools,

.


> > This is the reason that the Democrats saw a twenty point drop in New
> > Jersey

.


> It was a 5 pt loss in NJ.

.
And a year earlier, Obama won the state by 19 points. That's a 24
point loss for the Democrats.

If the Democrats drop six points in 2010, they lose the House. If
they drop ten points, that's the House and the Senate....and the House
in a landslide.

We have 360 days of double digit (or at best, near double digit)
unemployment until Nov.3, We also have massive debt, and inflation is
right around the corner.
.
And the next group of Republicans aren't the "compassionate
conservatives" you've dealt with for decades. We're angry. We're
angry at the treatment of Sarah Palin's teenaged daughters. We're
tired of being called racist every time we bring up a valid point.
We're disgusted by being called cocksuckers (AKA teabaggers.) We're
angry that our relgion has been attacked. We're furious who is pro-
pedophile is in charge making our schools safe.

The smart Democrats realize they're in deep trouble.

The smart Democrats are not in office.
.
> > and Virgina.  
.


> The Democrats didn't run anyone in VA.

.
That must be quite a shock to Creigh Deeds, the Democrat candidate.


.
> < Double digit unemployment, and the refusal of Obama to do anything to turn those numbers around.

.
> The recession is over. >
.
Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. 10.2% unemployment, 18%
REAL unemployment, and everything is juuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuussssst fine,
huh?

Picture yourself in a boat on a river,
With tangerine trees and marmalade skies
Somebody calls you, you answer quite slowly,
A girl with kaleidoscope eyes.

Cellophane flowers of yellow and green,
Towering over your head.
Look for the girl with the sun in her eyes,
And she's gone.

Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

Follow her down to a bridge by a fountain
Where rocking horse people eat marshmellow pies,
Everyone smiles as you drift past the flowers,
That grow so incredibly high.

Newspaper taxis appear on the shore,
Waiting to take you away.
Climb in the back with your head in the clouds,
And you're gone.

Lucy in the sky with diamonds,

Picture yourself on a train in a station,
With plasticine porters with looking glass ties,
Suddenly someone is there at the turnstyle,
The girl with the kaleidoscope eyes.
Lucy In The Sky With Diamons
John Lennon and Paul McCarthy

bvallely

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 1:43:16 PM11/9/09
to
.
> everything 'will' destroy the democratic party, it's been happening
> for decades
.
When Americans, who are used to being treated when they're sick
suddenly have to wait six months to see a doctor, and there are not
fingerprints on the bill but the Democrats, THAT is a party killer.

squirltok

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 6:18:38 PM11/9/09
to

Balance is good but they aren't balanced. I believe the politicians
need to earn votes, Republicans, if they don't get at least my
consideration of my vote then they are the
low quality of politics that chester inc possesses.

squirltok

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 6:26:20 PM11/9/09
to

Can you explain what the Republican party is for past self serving
greed and attacking Democrat
as party policy. I mean what else does the party even exist to do?

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 6:55:10 PM11/9/09
to
squirltok <squi...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:6f88bd7e-59af-4b47-a2b6-
72756e...@l2g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:

Same can be asked of the democrats You are ovbiously dumb enough to
think that dems care about you any more that the republicans do.
You have no clue what the parties are about
They are about threes simple prepositions for the career politicians
1 Get elected
2 Get re-elected
3 Get freinds or family elected

For you to honestly believe that the dems are in any way more moral
competent or deserving than republicans show just how naive you really
are.
Have a nice day Pollyanna

Bert Hyman

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:00:03 PM11/9/09
to
In news:ujkcf5p5k51qilnl2...@4ax.com Harry Hope
<riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

> Yup.

Yup; the Democrat's health bill.

People will remember that.

> 220-215

You seem to have forgotten about the Senate.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

leona...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:00:06 PM11/9/09
to
On Nov 8, 12:19 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
> > >Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
> > Or better still, how about a wet teabag?
>
> Does the bill include mental health care for suicidal rightards?

•• ROTFLMAO
It has no allowance for suicidal idiots like Cahill.

I am in favour of 50 state health care programs
run by the states with 33.4% subsidy by the
federal. Health and welfare are not "interstate
commerse" and the political-care bill that
passed the House will not long survive.

1- it is unworkable
2- it is unconstitutional
3- It is unlikely to pass the senate.
4- When it comes back from the conference
enough democrats not from California
and wishing to be re-elected will have
backed off.

Only one purely fascist program has
hassed since FDR and it has been disastrous --
that is/was the Carter/Clinton Community
Reinvestment Act. We have not yet recovered
from it and the real unemployment rate is
soaring near 20%.Yes! That is double what the
official Labour Dept stats say. Wall Street
Journal differs.


Daniel

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:03:03 PM11/9/09
to
On Nov 8, 3:22 pm, pbj <postittothenewsgr...@nospam.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 08:03:17 -0800, Daniel wrote:
> > On Nov 8, 12:10 am, Harry Hope <riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> Yup. 220-215. How 'bout that. Tissues anyone?
>
> > Why? Democrats just committed political suicide by ignoring the will of
> > the people.
>
> Is that anything like the political suicide they were committing last
> November by running a black man for President?

The media ran a slick campaign for nobama, and now the American
people are practically in open revolt. It's gonna be a long four years.

Daniel

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:04:09 PM11/9/09
to
On Nov 8, 4:09 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
> > .> Look, I'm trying to get rightards the mental health treatment you so
> > > desperately need.  
>
> What more do you want?  A chocolate on your pillow?
>
> > You know how little you want to talk about the Stimulus Bill?  
>
> The GOP tax cut recession would be far worse without it.

Funny you mention that, when no one really agrees with you libtards on
that subject.

squirltok

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:05:16 PM11/9/09
to

Seriously, everything could work great if Republicans didn't have this
defeat everything possible mentality. I think that they think that
gets them elected. But their false cover of 'working for the peoples
interests' has been exposed, defeating Democrats for the people, it
just don't jive with reality.

Daniel

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:09:01 PM11/9/09
to


Please explain to us passing nobamacare "jives with reality"

squirltok

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 8:14:39 PM11/9/09
to

I don't see anything getting in the way of can-do America from making
this work except for Republicans. Do what you think will do your party
well. Just saying it's doing every possible
thing the wrong way they possibly could.

leona...@gmail.com

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 12:08:38 AM11/10/09
to
On Nov 9, 7:05 pm, squirltok <squirl...@yahoo.com> wrote:

•• You fascist retards whine and cry because you
might not get your way. Reagan cut taxes and
got us out of Carter's stagflation and rebuilt
our armed forces. Clinton cut the forces again
and refused to go after bin Laden. And to make
things worse Slick Willy doubled & redoubled
down on Carter's Community Reinvestment
Act, by forcing the banks to invest more than
prudence would allow and then let them
package their loans and sell them as bonds
certified AAA by Standard & Poors et al.

•• Pres Bush tried to cut back on the program but
was limited by threats of racism. ("A claim of
racism is the last refuge of scoundrels") In any
case it was too late and just at the end of Bush's
term the 10, 12, and 15 year baloon payments
fell due and the contracts would not allow
reinvestment. So the homeowners were caught
between a rock and an hard place.

Of course Obummer came rushing to the rescue.
He gave billions to the bankers, but zip to the
people that voted for him.

The Tax Credit Assistance Program (TCAP) is a
Federal housing grant program administered by
HUD which assists Low Income Housing Tax
Credit (LIHTC) projects funded during 2007,
2008 and 2009. The TCAP program is part of
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act
and was signed by President Obama on Feb 17
2009. Now "Low Income Housing" to Carter,
Clinton and Obumma, is spelled 'black'.

Still I have yet to see where any of that money
has been distributed.

•• Ten months in offices and what has he done?
He bailed out several big banks which could
have managed without but every week we hear
of smaller banks being swallowed - one went
down Saturday. Who will it be next week?

He is being stupid about Wall street brokers
and insurance executives incomes. He is a
financial idiot ~~ he can only tax and spend
but has no clue how it works. Now take the
big brokers, bankers and execs. Their firms
pay taxes on their net incomes Then the
employees all pay income taxes on their
incomes and the employees income taxes
are a larger %ge of their gross income than
the corporation would pay.

Then the death taxes are like the goose that
lays the golden eggs break it up and NO
more eggs.

•• Obama is digging his own grave. I wonder
if he will survive the term. I shudder to see
that veep in the whitehouse.

––  ––
Political correctness is destroying Europe.

America will be the next down the PC tube
greased by academic idiots like Scott Erb,
Noam Chumpsky, and Ward Churchill, and
Slick Willy & Hilly, Algore & Pelosi, and
now Barak Hussein Muhammad Obama, too.

Message has been deleted

Bret Cahill

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 12:43:39 AM11/10/09
to
So how's your "CO2 Is Good for You" video coming along?

Remember to use clear plastic bags so everyone can watch the bliss on
your blissed out face as you breath 100% natural organic CO2.


Bret Cahill


Lamont Cranston

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 12:33:23 PM11/10/09
to
> �� You fascist retards

Fascism is a right-wing philosophy, Bunky.

> whine and cry because you
> might not get your way. Reagan cut taxes and

...then increased taxes more times than any POTUS in U.S.
history. The country had an average unemployment rate of
7.5% for the entire 8 years that he was in office. The guy
was a moron who thought trees caused pollution. He was a
fucking disaster.

bvallely

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 6:09:17 PM11/10/09
to
.
> > > everything 'will' destroy the democratic party, it's been happening
> > > for decades
.
> > When Americans, who are used to being treated when they're sick
> > suddenly have to wait six months to see a doctor, and there are not
> > fingerprints on the bill but the Democrats, THAT is a party killer.
.
> I don't see anything getting in the way of can-do America from making
> this work ...>
.
http://jcrue.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/okeefe.jpg
.

>Do what you think will do your party
> well. Just saying it's doing every possible
> thing the wrong way they possibly could.
.
Republicans Jump to Six-Point Lead on Generic Ballot
Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Republican candidates have stretched their lead over Democrats to six
points in the Generic Congressional Ballot.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 43%
would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate
while 37% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent. Republicans
have held the lead for over four months now.

Voters not affiliated with either party continue to heavily favor
Republicans, 43% to 20%.

Since late June, support for Republican candidates has ranged from 41%
to 44%, while support for Democrats has run from 36% to 40%. Looking
back one year ago, the two parties were in a much different place.
Throughout the fall of 2008, support for Democratic congressional
candidates ranged from 42% to 47%. Republican support ranged from 37%
to 41%.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_america/generic_congressional_ballot

bvallely

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 8:00:23 PM11/10/09
to
.

> Seriously, everything could work great if Republicans didn't have this
> defeat everything possible mentality. >
.
If ONLY Republicans would DO ARE THEY'RE ORDERED!!!!!!!

Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 10:05:31 PM11/10/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBE627DCABA3clairbear@
198.186.192.136:


> Unemployment has become an issue for everyone since the dems took
> control of congress some 3 years ago


Bingo!

Unemployment is a non-issue for Republicans unless
it rises under a democratic president.

Just like the deficit, come to think of it.


>> Is that sort of hypocrisy suddenly fashionable
>> with the Tea-bagging set?
> Seems abusive rudeness has become fashoinable with libs like you.


Republicans suddenly care about rudeness.

"Go fuck yourself" Dick Cheney on the Senate
floor, June 25, 2004.

Oh, the irony............

Clairbear

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 10:28:21 PM11/10/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CBFD69AB8A52...@216.196.97.130:

> Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBE627DCABA3clairbear@
> 198.186.192.136:
>
>
>> Unemployment has become an issue for everyone since the dems took
>> control of congress some 3 years ago
>
>
> Bingo!
>
> Unemployment is a non-issue for Republicans unless
> it rises under a democratic president.
>
> Just like the deficit, come to think of it.

We all know what you are full off mitchie
Of course you hatreds show thru in your every post


>
>
>
>>> Is that sort of hypocrisy suddenly fashionable
>>> with the Tea-bagging set?
>> Seems abusive rudeness has become fashoinable with libs like you.
>
>
> Republicans suddenly care about rudeness.

All peoeple should care about rudeness

> "Go fuck yourself" Dick Cheney on the Senate
> floor, June 25, 2004.

If he actually said that he was being boorish and rude
> Oh, the irony............
You would not know irony if it hit you right between you eyes
Go back to posting pics You are not very good at the political debates

datakoll

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 10:37:10 PM11/10/09
to
as Pogo said, " we have seen the enemy and weez doomed"

President's kids dont get shots. But he wants YOU to get the shots

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 11:02:57 PM11/10/09
to
On Nov 10, 5:09 pm, bvallely <bvall...@aol.com> wrote:
> .> > > everything 'will' destroy the democratic party, it's been happening
> > > > for decades
> .
> > > When Americans, who are used to being treated when they're sick
> > > suddenly have to wait six months to see a doctor, and there are not
> > > fingerprints on the bill but the Democrats, THAT is a party killer.
> .
> > I don't see anything getting in the way of can-do America from making
> > this work ...>
>
> .http://jcrue.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/okeefe.jpg

> .>Do what you think will do your party
> > well. Just saying it's doing every possible
> > thing the wrong way they possibly could.
>
> .
> Republicans Jump to Six-Point Lead on Generic Ballot
> Tuesday, November 10, 2009
>
> Republican candidates have stretched their lead over Democrats to six
> points in the Generic Congressional Ballot.
>
> The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 43%
> would vote for their district’s Republican congressional candidate
> while 37% would opt for his or her Democratic opponent. Republicans
> have held the lead for over four months now.
>
> Voters not affiliated with either party continue to heavily favor
> Republicans, 43% to 20%.
>
> Since late June, support for Republican candidates has ranged from 41%
> to 44%, while support for Democrats has run from 36% to 40%. Looking
> back one year ago, the two parties were in a much different place.
> Throughout the fall of 2008, support for Democratic congressional
> candidates ranged from 42% to 47%. Republican support ranged from 37%
> to 41%.
>
> http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/mood_of_ameri...

Bill is DOA in the Senate. Even the Dems admit it. Oh another
CZAR has
resigned aka got her ass fired. Anita Dunn IS DONE ...she will
have to
worship chairman mao. and obamao ..,..get it ?? ....good
comrade...
hattz begania...or something

datakoll

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 1:01:38 AM11/11/09
to
On Nov 10, 8:02 pm, "President's kids dont get shots. But he wants YOU
>    hattz begania...or something- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

DOSE VEGLIA, COMRADE

Mitchell Holman

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 8:35:20 AM11/11/09
to
Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBFE499BD2A1clairbear@
198.186.192.136:

> Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:Xns9CBFD69AB8A52...@216.196.97.130:
>
>> Clairbear <cl...@Verizon.net> wrote in news:Xns9CBE627DCABA3clairbear@
>> 198.186.192.136:
>>
>>
>>> Unemployment has become an issue for everyone since the dems took
>>> control of congress some 3 years ago
>>
>>
>> Bingo!
>>
>> Unemployment is a non-issue for Republicans unless
>> it rises under a democratic president.
>>
>> Just like the deficit, come to think of it.
> We all know what you are full off mitchie
> Of course you hatreds show thru in your every post


Let us examine the roots of your hypoccrisy.

Repost for us anything you said about unemployment
while Bush was president.

Put it right here:


Clairbear

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 9:54:56 AM11/11/09
to
Mitchell Holman <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:Xns9CC04D4038668...@216.196.97.130:

"hypoccrisy."
No if I did this in a post your be all over that and ignor the subject

But as to Bush and his remarks on unemploymentIf you cannot find them why
should I help you As I have never made any assertion as to his words about
that or most other subject I am not a party lickspittle like you and other
DNC stooges


Daniel

unread,
Nov 11, 2009, 12:36:02 PM11/11/09
to
On Nov 10, 12:23 am, smor...@board.com wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2009 00:00:03 GMT, Bert Hyman
>
> <b...@iphouse.com> wrote:
> >Innews:ujkcf5p5k51qilnl2...@4ax.comHarry Hope

> ><riv...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yup.
>
> >Yup; the Democrat's health bill.
>
> >People will remember that.
>
> Since it IS the #1 issue of Americans---why not?

You're lying of course, but for libtards that's their MO.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/02/economy.poll/index.html


It's the economy, fuckwit.

0 new messages