Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Good Re: IRS Prepares To Enforce Obamacare's Contraception Mandate...against Christian values - No more separation of Church and (Marxist turned Fascist) State
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 9, 2013, 7:33:26 PM6/9/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> This Won’t Turn Out Well
> The IRS prepares to enforce Obamacare’s contraception mandate
>
> Jun 17, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 38 • By ASHLEY E. MCGUIRE
> http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/won-t-turn-out-well_733957.html
>
> On August 1, the one-year “safe harbor” for religious charities
> objecting to provisions of Obamacare will end. Starting then, these
> nonprofit employers will be forced to violate their religious beliefs
> or pay large fines. In charge of collecting the fines will be our
> recently newsworthy friends at the Internal Revenue Service.
>
> To recap how we got here: In 2010 a panel created by the new health
> care law determined that all health insurance policies provided by
> employers must cover contraception, sterilization, and abortion drugs
> free of charge. Employers not complying with this Health and Human
> Services (HHS) mandate will be fined up to $100 per employee, per day.
> For some, that could mount to millions of dollars a year.
>
> The administration and its supporters promoted the mandate as
> necessary for women’s health. They trotted out activist Sandra Fluke,
> who argued that women are withering under the pressure of having to
> pay for their own birth control. Never mind the fact that
> contraception can cost an insured woman as little as $9 a month, and
> many without insurance have access to the same products through
> publicly funded programs like Title X. To question the necessity of
> the new requirement, its supporters said, was to make war on women.
>
> Some have tried to create the impression that a compromise was
> brokered to accommodate the objectors’ conscience concerns. But this
> is not so.
>
> CB
> First the Bible was taken out of schools in 1962 by men in black
> robes. That act took moral authority from instilling, "fear of God is
> the beginning of wisdom" Proverbs 9:10.Then came the Age of Aquarius,
> the drug culture, Woodstock, free love, rebellion, Kent State, Walter
> Cronkite telling the American people fighting Communism in Veitnam
> isn't worth the price in blood and treasure. The fall of America's
> dominance in scholastic achievement as a nation can be traced back to
> '62'.
>
> The fall of America is at the hans of this Marxist turned Facist
Render unto Caesar. That's the law. If employees don't like it, they can
quit. What's next, refusing to serve blacks?
>
> This Won’t Turn Out Well
> The IRS prepares to enforce Obamacare’s contraception mandate
>
> Jun 17, 2013, Vol. 18, No. 38 • By ASHLEY E. MCGUIRE
> http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/won-t-turn-out-well_733957.html
>
> On August 1, the one-year “safe harbor” for religious charities
> objecting to provisions of Obamacare will end. Starting then, these
> nonprofit employers will be forced to violate their religious beliefs
> or pay large fines. In charge of collecting the fines will be our
> recently newsworthy friends at the Internal Revenue Service.
>
> To recap how we got here: In 2010 a panel created by the new health
> care law determined that all health insurance policies provided by
> employers must cover contraception, sterilization, and abortion drugs
> free of charge. Employers not complying with this Health and Human
> Services (HHS) mandate will be fined up to $100 per employee, per day.
> For some, that could mount to millions of dollars a year.
>
> The administration and its supporters promoted the mandate as
> necessary for women’s health. They trotted out activist Sandra Fluke,
> who argued that women are withering under the pressure of having to
> pay for their own birth control. Never mind the fact that
> contraception can cost an insured woman as little as $9 a month, and
> many without insurance have access to the same products through
> publicly funded programs like Title X. To question the necessity of
> the new requirement, its supporters said, was to make war on women.
>
> Some have tried to create the impression that a compromise was
> brokered to accommodate the objectors’ conscience concerns. But this
> is not so.
>
> CB
> First the Bible was taken out of schools in 1962 by men in black
> robes. That act took moral authority from instilling, "fear of God is
> the beginning of wisdom" Proverbs 9:10.Then came the Age of Aquarius,
> the drug culture, Woodstock, free love, rebellion, Kent State, Walter
> Cronkite telling the American people fighting Communism in Veitnam
> isn't worth the price in blood and treasure. The fall of America's
> dominance in scholastic achievement as a nation can be traced back to
> '62'.
>
> The fall of America is at the hans of this Marxist turned Facist
Render unto Caesar. That's the law. If employees don't like it, they can
quit. What's next, refusing to serve blacks?
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Joe Cooper
Jun 10, 2013, 5:07:12 PM6/10/13
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:t0gcr8tcu5ksfv4t7u6tlq2po8v1rp5ftc@
4ax.com:
> Abortion is a RIGHT of a citizen who must never be required to be a
> slave to white religious beliefs.
Democrats love to talk about rights. The right to a job, to health care,
to American citizenship, to a place in college, to free birth control --
but not the Bill of Rights, not property rights, not the right of
opponents to compete in fair elections. Democrats don't care overmuch for
the core American values of individual liberty and responsibility. They
dream of making the world over into a never-seen-before beautiful and
fair and peaceful place, all through the power of government. (Ann
Coulter)
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
Talking about Republican racism, idiocy and selfishness became dinner
table conversations for millions. President Obama's viciousness was
downgraded to "incivility," or even admired as strength by his followers.
Scapegoating Republicans for the country's woes was greeted happily and
amplified by his followers. Hatred of Republicans was a fun way for
them to bond with one another. It reinforced their sense of moral and
political superiority, as scapegoating always does. No Republican
policy was considered a well-meaning, albeit misguided, proposal aimed
4ax.com:
> Abortion is a RIGHT of a citizen who must never be required to be a
> slave to white religious beliefs.
Democrats love to talk about rights. The right to a job, to health care,
to American citizenship, to a place in college, to free birth control --
but not the Bill of Rights, not property rights, not the right of
opponents to compete in fair elections. Democrats don't care overmuch for
the core American values of individual liberty and responsibility. They
dream of making the world over into a never-seen-before beautiful and
fair and peaceful place, all through the power of government. (Ann
Coulter)
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
Talking about Republican racism, idiocy and selfishness became dinner
table conversations for millions. President Obama's viciousness was
downgraded to "incivility," or even admired as strength by his followers.
Scapegoating Republicans for the country's woes was greeted happily and
amplified by his followers. Hatred of Republicans was a fun way for
them to bond with one another. It reinforced their sense of moral and
political superiority, as scapegoating always does. No Republican
policy was considered a well-meaning, albeit misguided, proposal aimed
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Import Identity
Jun 14, 2013, 11:38:17 AM6/14/13
to
On 6/10/2013 4:45 PM, Kirby Grant wrote:
> The more
> complex issue is for the woman who wants to protect herself against
> contraception and cannot afford to pay the over-the-counter price of things
> like the pill, diaphrams, Depro-vera shots, IUDs, etc and to block religious
> groups who provide healthcare insurance from preventing the people they
> cover from using contraception base on the decisions of some nut job who
> tells people in that religious that birth control is against god.
Do you have the faintest idea how much those methods cost?
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
> The more
> complex issue is for the woman who wants to protect herself against
> contraception and cannot afford to pay the over-the-counter price of things
> like the pill, diaphrams, Depro-vera shots, IUDs, etc and to block religious
> groups who provide healthcare insurance from preventing the people they
> cover from using contraception base on the decisions of some nut job who
> tells people in that religious that birth control is against god.
Do you have the faintest idea how much those methods cost?
--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ne...@netfront.net ---
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 16, 2013, 11:55:54 PM6/16/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>
> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >
> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >
> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
>
> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
They are not exempt from the law.
> Where on Earth does Obama get the power to dictate what private
> Christian instituions offer their employees as employment 'perks'?
>
> Christians are all but prohibited from calling homos, fag becasuse
> political correctness/moralizing on sinfull behavior.
>
> So how can Obama inpose his A-moral morality onto Christian
> institutional with all authority from government? What right gives him
> that authrorty? Social Justice? Revenge?
>
> Evil exorsizing its power over goodness
>
> >
> >Good god you are one dumb fuck
>
> You know what you be, nigger.
>
> CB
> NOTE:
> My use of the word 'nigger' is of a character description. In no way
> do I use the word to disparage Black people. When I use "nigger" to
> describe low down and ugly people I refer to Webster's Dictionary
> before the age of Political Correctness, around 1978. Nigger described
> low down and ugly people and that's how I use it with people who post
> 'vulgarity'. Look up that word.
> http://sphotos-a.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn1/601439_267770363343252_798319774_n.jpg
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 17, 2013, 1:19:28 AM6/17/13
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
> I've never seen such disjointed, unconnected stringing together
> meaningless words and then pretending they mean something
English is not his first language.
>
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >
> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >>
> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >
> >They are not exempt from the law.
>
> Nor his babbling, apparantly
> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >
> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >>
> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >
> >They are not exempt from the law.
>
>
> I've never seen such disjointed, unconnected stringing together
> meaningless words and then pretending they mean something
English is not his first language.
Message has been deleted
Import Identity
Jun 17, 2013, 11:53:56 AM6/17/13
to
On 6/14/2013 11:38 AM, Import Identity wrote:
> On 6/10/2013 4:45 PM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>> The more
>> complex issue is for the woman who wants to protect herself against
>> contraception and cannot afford to pay the over-the-counter price of
>> things
>> like the pill, diaphrams, Depro-vera shots, IUDs, etc and to block
>> religious
>> groups who provide healthcare insurance from preventing the people they
>> cover from using contraception base on the decisions of some nut job who
>> tells people in that religious that birth control is against god.
>
> Do you have the faintest idea how much those methods cost?
>
Clearly you do not have the foggiest notion of what your are talking
> On 6/10/2013 4:45 PM, Kirby Grant wrote:
>> The more
>> complex issue is for the woman who wants to protect herself against
>> contraception and cannot afford to pay the over-the-counter price of
>> things
>> like the pill, diaphrams, Depro-vera shots, IUDs, etc and to block
>> religious
>> groups who provide healthcare insurance from preventing the people they
>> cover from using contraception base on the decisions of some nut job who
>> tells people in that religious that birth control is against god.
>
> Do you have the faintest idea how much those methods cost?
>
about. No surprise there!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 19, 2013, 1:11:07 AM6/19/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
>
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >
> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >>
> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >
> >They are not exempt from the law.
>
> What law?
> >>
> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >
> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >>
> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >
> >They are not exempt from the law.
>
The one you're complaining about. Duh
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 23, 2013, 4:12:26 PM6/23/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:11:07 -0600, RichTravsky
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >> >
> >> >They are not exempt from the law.
> >>
> >> What law?
> >
> >The one you're complaining about. Duh
>
> You 'is' a 'duh'
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >> >
> >> >They are not exempt from the law.
> >>
> >> What law?
> >
> >The one you're complaining about. Duh
>
>
> Show me a law that requires any private Christian institution to
How are they exempt from the law? ANY law?
> violate its Biblical/moral character to provide 'specific' wants from
> their insured. Either you accept what's offered or get your own
> insurance, freeloader.
>
> CB
> 29 Dim Progressive degenerates
> http://www.ranker.com/list/democrat-sex-scandals/web-infoguy
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 25, 2013, 11:37:48 PM6/25/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 14:12:26 -0600, RichTravsky
>
> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:11:07 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> >> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> >> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >They are not exempt from the law.
> >> >>
> >> >> What law?
> >> >
> >> >The one you're complaining about. Duh
> >>
> >> You 'is' a 'duh'
> >>
> >> Show me a law that requires any private Christian institution to
> >
> >How are they exempt from the law? ANY law?
>
> ...
>
> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:11:07 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> On Sun, 16 Jun 2013 21:55:54 -0600, RichTravsky
> >> >> <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >> On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:45:59 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
> >> >> >> >On Fri, 14 Jun 2013 19:05:52 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
> >> >> >> >7/11.nig wrote:
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >>Homos don't like moralists dictating their risky behavior, why should
> >> >> >> >>Oboob try to dictate Christian institutions moral behavior?
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >How can it be "risky" unless you engage in it with them
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I'm talking about the Boob trying to dictate to private Christian
> >> >> >> institutions they are to include birth control (recreational safety),
> >> >> >> under (rewrite meaning) privately purchased 'healthcare', dummy.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >They are not exempt from the law.
> >> >>
> >> >> What law?
> >> >
> >> >The one you're complaining about. Duh
> >>
> >> You 'is' a 'duh'
> >>
> >> Show me a law that requires any private Christian institution to
> >
> >How are they exempt from the law? ANY law?
>
> Those of us who object have an irrefutable case. American courts have
> long held as a foundational principle the right of religious
> institutions to control their own affairs. It was reaffirmed by the
> Supreme Court as recently as January 11 in a case involving
> ministerial hiring. It is notable that in that case, Hosanna-Tabor
> Evangelical Lutheran Church v. EEOC, the Obama administration was also
> challenging the basic time-honored principle of ecclesiastical
> autonomy. But a unanimous Court rejected the Obama administration’s
> position, declaring it to be “extreme” and explaining that the suit
> was “hard to square with the text of the First Amendment itself, which
> gives special solicitude to the rights of religious organizations.”
> ...
> http://washingtonexaminer.com/president-obama-versus-religious-liberty/article/224461
Bzzt. Render unto Caesar...
"We express no view on whether the exception bars other types of suits,
including actions by employees alleging breach of contract or tortious
conduct."
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jun 29, 2013, 12:45:03 AM6/29/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:37:48 -0600, RichTravsky
>
Don't you know the bible?
> What right does the Boob have interfering in private contractual
> agreements for employment?
It's been that way for decades.
> >
> >"We express no view on whether the exception bars other types of suits,
> >including actions by employees alleging breach of contract or tortious
> >conduct."
>
> employment/insurance contract, hypocrite. Read the contract before you
> sign. Buyer beware
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
RichTravsky
Jul 1, 2013, 12:41:31 AM7/1/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Jun 2013 22:45:03 -0600, RichTravsky
>
> 'render'
Didn't you claim to know the bible?
> >> What right does the Boob have interfering in private contractual
> >> agreements for employment?
> >
> >It's been that way for decades.
>
> Seperation of Church and State?
You're funny, you're the guy who wants the schools to force prayer back
into classes!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Joe Cooper
Jul 2, 2013, 4:02:38 PM7/2/13
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:2rb6t8pqj065p391l3i32pffhvufavbmn0@
4ax.com:
> Add to that the voter suppression laws that are designed to do exactly
> what you poor assholes keep getting caught doing that's against the
> law.
Poor yoorghi...he thinks asking folks to prove they are who they say they
are is "suppression." Try that line when bording a jetliner.
(Yoorghi, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings when I said you were stupid
-- I thought you already knew.)
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
“They [The FCC] have no respect for the courts, no respect for the states,
no respect for the Constitution, no respect for federal law.... In the face
of a court order where the FCC was told ‘you may not regulate the
Internet,’ they said, ‘Well, we’re going to do that anyway.’ That is just
extraordinary to me.” (Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli)
4ax.com:
> Add to that the voter suppression laws that are designed to do exactly
> what you poor assholes keep getting caught doing that's against the
> law.
Poor yoorghi...he thinks asking folks to prove they are who they say they
are is "suppression." Try that line when bording a jetliner.
(Yoorghi, I didn't mean to hurt your feelings when I said you were stupid
-- I thought you already knew.)
--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/
“They [The FCC] have no respect for the courts, no respect for the states,
no respect for the Constitution, no respect for federal law.... In the face
of a court order where the FCC was told ‘you may not regulate the
Internet,’ they said, ‘Well, we’re going to do that anyway.’ That is just
extraordinary to me.” (Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli)
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs
Jul 2, 2013, 10:52:08 PM7/2/13
to
On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:06:23 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:30:46 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>Well known righwing conservative said that extremism in defense of a
>>>moral principle isn't bad.
>>>
>>>your racism is more of a problem--because the use of the racist slur
>>>IS detectable by electronics
>>
>>So? Is there a crime here? Did I provoke violence? Am I responsible
>>for someone else's act of violence?
>
>Yes.
>
>Exactly like those Texas conservaties were by taking out full page ads
>targeting JFK and resulting in his assassination
>
>Exactly like Robertson, Falwell, Dobson preaching "God loves you" if
>you whack womens doctors
>
>Exactly like the rightwing rhetoric that prompted Tim McVeigh to
>slaughter hundreds of people in OK
>
>and exactly like the hate preached in religious institutions that
>gave support to the religous nut jobs (like you) reason to hit the
>Trade Towers on 9-11
>
>You are as racist and vicous, dispicable and ignorant as any, or all
>of them. You merely pretent or ignore the fact that you are a sick
>asshole.
You're really gonnuh get pissed over the last one then. I drop all
political correctness describing Jeantel
It's a long time in coming but the truth must be told of how the
culture of the ghetto has 'evoled'...backwards
>On Tue, 02 Jul 2013 14:30:46 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
>7/11.nig wrote:
>
>>>Well known righwing conservative said that extremism in defense of a
>>>moral principle isn't bad.
>>>
>>>your racism is more of a problem--because the use of the racist slur
>>>IS detectable by electronics
>>
>>So? Is there a crime here? Did I provoke violence? Am I responsible
>>for someone else's act of violence?
>
>Yes.
>
>Exactly like those Texas conservaties were by taking out full page ads
>targeting JFK and resulting in his assassination
>
>Exactly like Robertson, Falwell, Dobson preaching "God loves you" if
>you whack womens doctors
>
>Exactly like the rightwing rhetoric that prompted Tim McVeigh to
>slaughter hundreds of people in OK
>
>and exactly like the hate preached in religious institutions that
>gave support to the religous nut jobs (like you) reason to hit the
>Trade Towers on 9-11
>
>You are as racist and vicous, dispicable and ignorant as any, or all
>of them. You merely pretent or ignore the fact that you are a sick
>asshole.
You're really gonnuh get pissed over the last one then. I drop all
political correctness describing Jeantel
It's a long time in coming but the truth must be told of how the
culture of the ghetto has 'evoled'...backwards
RichTravsky
Jul 2, 2013, 11:16:10 PM7/2/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Sun, 30 Jun 2013 22:41:31 -0600, RichTravsky
>
> "at some point people make enough money, his use of the IRS/SS and
> his glutinous leisure time requirements, I'd say he means to take
> everything from us. Obama doesn't serve the people, we serve Caesar.
>
> Was I clear enough?
So you don't really know the bible.
> >> >> What right does the Boob have interfering in private contractual
> >> >> agreements for employment?
> >> >
> >> >It's been that way for decades.
> >>
> >> Where does the Marxist turned Fascist get the authority to violate
> >> Seperation of Church and State?
> >
> >You're funny, you're the guy who wants the schools to force prayer back
> >into classes!
>
The Constitution forbids that. Get over it.
> parents can be assured their child knows the meaning of self
> discipline, humility, the value of life, love, salvation and what
> government/Caesar is capable of in the name of Secular Humanism.
Then why aren't the parents the ones handling that???
WELL?
> >> >> >"We express no view on whether the exception bars other types of suits,
> >> >> >including actions by employees alleging breach of contract or tortious
> >> >> >conduct."
> >> >>
> >> >> Employees habs no right to sue if'n they signed their
> >> >> employment/insurance contract, hypocrite. Read the contract before you
> >> >> sign. Buyer beware
>
RichTravsky
Jul 2, 2013, 11:19:17 PM7/2/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
>
> <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote:
>
> >Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:3jqcr8pac0pvdsjsqk3rhb5jddhbpufdcj@
> >4ax.com:
> >
> >> Clean". But that is NOT "Voter fraud".
> >
> >Ah, yes, Voter fraud...that's when top staffer for Florida Democratic
> >Rep. Joe Garcia resigns after being implicated in a voting-fraud scheme;
> >when Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson admitted flat-out to voting
> >twice for President Barack Obama in November and was subsequently
> >convicted of illegal voting; when Marguerite Kloos, of Delhi Township,
> >and Russell Glossop, of Symmes Township, entered guilty pleas…they liked
> >voting for dead people – presumably, dead Democrats - and are now, like
> >Ms. Richardson, awaiting sentencing.
> >
> >How 'bout that jury in South Bend, Indiana that found that fraud put
> >President Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in
> >Indiana in the 2008 election? Two Democratic political operatives were
> >convicted in the illegal scheme after only three hours of deliberations.
> >They were found guilty on all counts.
> >
> >Democrats all - who woulda thunk it?
> >
> >Then, of course, we have the massive voter suppression by the IRS, but
> >hey, who's counting?
>
> Great post!
http://www.politicspa.com/turzai-voter-id-law-means-romney-can-win-pa/37153/
Turzai: Voter ID Law Means Romney Can Win PA
"We are focused on making sure that we meet our obligations that we've talked
about for years," said Turzai in a speech to committee members Saturday. He
mentioned the law among a laundry list of accomplishments made by the GOP-run
legislature.
"Pro-Second Amendment? The Castle Doctrine, it's done. First pro-life
legislation abortion facility regulations in 22 years, done. Voter ID,
which is gonna allow Governor Romney to win the state of Pennsylvania, done."
...
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2012/08/19/fight-over-poll-hours-isnt-just-political.html
...
"I guess I really actually feel we shouldn't contort the voting process to
accommodate the urban read African-American voter-turnout machine," said
Doug Preisse, chairman of the county Republican Party and elections board
member who voted against weekend hours, in an email to The Dispatch.
...
Great post!
Message has been deleted
Joe Cooper
Jul 4, 2013, 4:33:42 PM7/4/13
to
Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:chine.bleu-
7F0DBD.135...@news.eternal-september.org:
> Do you have a right to board a jetliner?
Do you have the right to vote more than once?
Do dead people have the right to vote?
Do illegal aliens have the right to vote?
The fundamental problem of the political left seems to be that the real
world does not fit their preconceptions. Therefore they see the real world
as what is wrong, and what needs to be changed, since apparently their
preconceptions cannot be wrong. (Thomas Sowell)
7F0DBD.135...@news.eternal-september.org:
> Do you have a right to board a jetliner?
Do you have the right to vote more than once?
Do dead people have the right to vote?
Do illegal aliens have the right to vote?
The fundamental problem of the political left seems to be that the real
world does not fit their preconceptions. Therefore they see the real world
as what is wrong, and what needs to be changed, since apparently their
preconceptions cannot be wrong. (Thomas Sowell)
Joe Cooper
Jul 4, 2013, 4:34:32 PM7/4/13
to
Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:0gi6t8l4sc03mpfdteruefcirdpb10ek09@
4ax.com:
> THere's no one short of a fucking southern racist that hasn't
> concluded the identical goal of the voter suppression in states has
> the same goal they did in the 50-60's.
>
> Every law passed in the last 2 years is specifcally designed to lessen
> black, young and elderly turnout at the polls.
>
> PROVEN
Such endless tedium...poor yoorghi, all hat and no cattle.
4ax.com:
> THere's no one short of a fucking southern racist that hasn't
> concluded the identical goal of the voter suppression in states has
> the same goal they did in the 50-60's.
>
> Every law passed in the last 2 years is specifcally designed to lessen
> black, young and elderly turnout at the polls.
>
> PROVEN
Such endless tedium...poor yoorghi, all hat and no cattle.
Message has been deleted
R.Dean
Jul 28, 2013, 6:31:56 PM7/28/13
to
On 7/2/2013 2:13 PM, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
> <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote:
>
>> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:3jqcr8pac0pvdsjsqk3rhb5jddhbpufdcj@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>> Clean". But that is NOT "Voter fraud".
>>
>> Ah, yes, Voter fraud...that's when top staffer for Florida Democratic
>> Rep. Joe Garcia resigns after being implicated in a voting-fraud scheme;
>> when Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson admitted flat-out to voting
>> twice for President Barack Obama in November and was subsequently
>> convicted of illegal voting; when Marguerite Kloos, of Delhi Township,
>> and Russell Glossop, of Symmes Township, entered guilty pleas�they liked
> On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 14:37:14 +0000 (UTC), Joe Cooper
> <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote:
>
>> Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote in news:3jqcr8pac0pvdsjsqk3rhb5jddhbpufdcj@
>> 4ax.com:
>>
>>> Clean". But that is NOT "Voter fraud".
>>
>> Ah, yes, Voter fraud...that's when top staffer for Florida Democratic
>> Rep. Joe Garcia resigns after being implicated in a voting-fraud scheme;
>> when Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson admitted flat-out to voting
>> twice for President Barack Obama in November and was subsequently
>> convicted of illegal voting; when Marguerite Kloos, of Delhi Township,
>> voting for dead people � presumably, dead Democrats - and are now, like
>> Ms. Richardson, awaiting sentencing.
>>
>> How 'bout that jury in South Bend, Indiana that found that fraud put
>> President Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in
>> Indiana in the 2008 election? Two Democratic political operatives were
>> convicted in the illegal scheme after only three hours of deliberations.
>> They were found guilty on all counts.
>>
>> Democrats all - who woulda thunk it?
>>
>> Then, of course, we have the massive voter suppression by the IRS, but
>> hey, who's counting?
>
> Great post!
>
This demonstrates the _real_reason Democrats are opposed to voter
>>
>> How 'bout that jury in South Bend, Indiana that found that fraud put
>> President Obama and Hillary Clinton on the presidential primary ballot in
>> Indiana in the 2008 election? Two Democratic political operatives were
>> convicted in the illegal scheme after only three hours of deliberations.
>> They were found guilty on all counts.
>>
>> Democrats all - who woulda thunk it?
>>
>> Then, of course, we have the massive voter suppression by the IRS, but
>> hey, who's counting?
>
> Great post!
>
picture I.D. Voter repression charges is a farce. You need a picture
I.D. to get a check cashed, to get a library card, to borrow money, to
buy a car, to become a member of the AAA, etc.etc. but you need no proof
that you are who you say you are in order to vote? This is a
joke, but the joke is on the GOP.
Message has been deleted
Joe Cooper
Jul 29, 2013, 3:14:20 AM7/29/13
to
"R.Dean" <R.D...@gmail.com> wrote in news:wZgJt.60637$AH.2...@fx08.fr7:
> This demonstrates the _real_reason Democrats are opposed to voter
> picture I.D. Voter repression charges is a farce. You need a picture
> I.D. to get a check cashed, to get a library card, to borrow money, to
> buy a car, to become a member of the AAA, etc.etc. but you need no proof
> that you are who you say you are in order to vote? This is a
> joke, but the joke is on the GOP.
What is REALLY hilarious is that Obama's administration is PAYING Kenya to
establish national voter ID.
Isn't that funny?
--
"If Obama had a city, it would look like Detroit!" Get the T-Shirt -
http://www.cafepress.com/obamasdetroit
"Phoney scandals don't come home in body bags." (Former Navy Seal Don
Bongino)
Detroit in ruins - liberals in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=
1hhJ_49leBw
> This demonstrates the _real_reason Democrats are opposed to voter
> picture I.D. Voter repression charges is a farce. You need a picture
> I.D. to get a check cashed, to get a library card, to borrow money, to
> buy a car, to become a member of the AAA, etc.etc. but you need no proof
> that you are who you say you are in order to vote? This is a
> joke, but the joke is on the GOP.
establish national voter ID.
Isn't that funny?
--
"If Obama had a city, it would look like Detroit!" Get the T-Shirt -
http://www.cafepress.com/obamasdetroit
"Phoney scandals don't come home in body bags." (Former Navy Seal Don
Bongino)
Detroit in ruins - liberals in action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=
1hhJ_49leBw
Joe Cooper
Jul 29, 2013, 3:16:43 AM7/29/13
to
Siri Cruise <chine...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:chine.bleu-
353E9B.164...@news.eternal-september.org:
> I don't need an ID to get a bicycle or ride the bus.
You need an ID for alcohol and tobacco, if you look young, and you need it
to board an airplane.
If you want to vote in Kenya, you need photo ID or you can't vote. Ask
Obama - it was his idea, and you're paying for it.
Can you spell HYPOCRITE? I knew you could.
0 new messages