America doesn't want some "citizen of the world" POTUS. It wants an "America
First" POTUS. Other countries are our rivals. Sometimes friendly. Sometimes
less than friendly. But always rivals. Of COURSE they want him to win. Of
COURSE they're fawning and tootling on his black meat whistle. They see him
as weak, gullible, and easily intimidated. He'd be the perfect POTUS to
advance their interests.
Moonnigger's been getting his ass kissed by sycophants for years and has
actually convinced himself that he's some kind of messiah. It's called
hubris. And that precedes the fall.
Americans increasingly see that he's pandering to the very people who take
American jobs and refuse to carry their load in the WOT.
"No Bounce for Obama From Overseas Trip"
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,390301,00.html
Not among people who actually want to *solve* terrorism instead of
profiting from it.
Europe may want Obama to lead America, but I doubt they'd vote for him to
lead them.
>
> Europe may want Obama to lead America, but I doubt they'd vote for him to lead them
Lay off of Senator Obama, Bibs.
Hey - Selma got him born, remember?
Now the Europeans are gonna elect him.
Unless somebody comes across with "the tape".
And how would you solve the problem, Nancy? By hoisting you teeny pink ass
in the air for the muzzies to have some fun?
> Europe may want Obama to lead America, but I doubt they'd vote for him to
> lead them.
Got news for you, dipshit, *Americans* want Obama to lead America.
And when it happens, racist bigoted cunts like you are in for a long
miserable eight years.
"Bring it on"...;p.
<Flush again>
This is fun.
"*anti-Americans* want Obama to lead America." is more like it.
Jealous-bean continues to play the race card just because we won't vote for
Barrack Hussein Obama.
Your continued derogatory use of the word "cunt" tells us all you've never
been with a woman. That explains your bitterness toward your superiors like
myself.
Pooooooooorrr Jealous-bean, maybe if Obama is elected the gov't will pay for
your sex-change and you won't be so frustrated anymore. We can then send you
to Afghanistan to entertain the Taliban.
By doing just what Obama said in his speech - concentrate our efforts on
building alliances against terrorism all over the world. In the long
run, the most pivotal "battleground" against terrorism is likely to be
Europe, not the middle east. Look at the demographics. Europe is
likely to become majority (or at least, plurality) Muslim. Eliminating
Islam is not going to happen. What we need to do is coexist. We need
to make moderate Muslims our biggest allies in fighting Muslim extremists.
The Rambo approach will never work.
It worked against the Nazis.
It worked against the Japs.
I just did a search of all your posts to Usenet using Google Groups,
BibsBro. Here it is:
Out of *over* 6,680 posts to 134 different Usenet groups, NOT ONCE
have you *ever* referred to John McCain by *his full name* -- John
Sidney McCain III.
Not even as "John Sidney McCain".
Why is that, hypocrite?
-Tom Sr.
No, WWII was not won by any single Rambo nation. No single nation could
stand against the Nazis. You didn't hear Roosevelt going around
denigrating "old Europe"
No, what I said is what I mean, you simpleton.
Here it is again: "Got news for you, dipshit, *Americans* want Obama to lead
America."
That is an indisputable fact, and that is why assholes like you are frothing
at the mouth.
> Jealous-bean continues to play the race card just because we won't vote
> for Barrack Hussein Obama.
LOL! Whose "we" fuckwit, you and the voices in your tiny head?
And as for "the race card", my posts prove I am no racist, whereas yours
display all the earmarks of a classic racist cunt.
> Your continued derogatory use of the word "cunt" tells us all you've never
> been with a woman. That explains your bitterness toward your superiors
> like myself.
Oh dear, when simpletons like you try to use big words, it always ends in
tears.
E.g.. my use of the word "cunt" in relation to you is not "derogatory," it
is simply apt.
And as an intelligent human being, I accept that others will be "superior"
to me in some respects however a knuckle-dragging, mouthbreating, racist
bigoted cunt like you is definitely not amongst their number.
> Pooooooooorrr Jealous-bean, maybe if Obama is elected the gov't will pay
> for your sex-change and you won't be so frustrated anymore. We can then
> send you to Afghanistan to entertain the Taliban.
Its quite telling that a gutless little piece of shit coward like you isn't
actually fighting the war you're so enamored of, rather you just blather on
about "we" as if you are making some contribution to the war effort.
Where the reality is you sit at home smoking pot, masturbating to kiddie
porn and posting to the internet while brave men and women are out there
dying for your moron-in-chiefs disastrous war of choice.
Well, I'm guessing he doesn't even know the answer to that simple question,
given he's just another follower who regurgitates mindless rightwing media
talking points.
The poor little cunt obviously has not got the mental capability to question
what he is thinking, let alone what he is saying.
Sorry, America had minor help beating the Nazis and no help beating
the Japs.
We need "Rambo" now more than ever. We have a BILLION Muslims that
need killing.
And we need to bomb the Holy Living JESUS SHIT out of Iran!
> Sorry, America had minor help beating the Nazis and no help beating
> the Japs.
Tell me you're joking.
It was primarily Russia who defeated the Nazis, though I suppose you
knew that.
So says Bob Milby Jr., who *believes* he is a "Good Christian"....
-Tom Sr.
Of course not.
>It was primarily Russia who defeated the Nazis, though I suppose you
>knew that.
No, it wasn't.
It was America who drove the Nazis out of ALL of Europe from Italy up
to the Netherlands. It was America who liberated EVERY European
country. The Russians did not liberate Germany, France, etc.
It WAS the Russians who defeated the remnants of the Nazis after the
Nazis had been driven from Europe.
Canadian fags are easily amused.
Heh heh...
Your rightardedness is showing again, Princess.
Read up on Operation Bagration...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Bagration
"Overall the near-total annihilation of Army Group Centre cost the
Germans 2,000 tanks and 57,000 other vehicles. According to Steven
Zaloga, German losses are estimated at 300,000 dead, 250,000 wounded,
and about 120,000 captured (overall casualties at 670,000); Soviet
losses were also substantial, with 60,000 killed, 110,000 wounded, and
about 8,000 missing, with 2,957 tanks, 2,447 artillery pieces, and 822
aircraft also lost."
Compare those figures to the Battle of Falaise Pocket which was
occurring at about the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falaise_pocket
"Although perhaps 100,000 German troops succeeded in escaping the
Allies because of the delay in closing the gap (many of them wounded),
they left behind 40,000-50,000 prisoners, over 10,000 dead, and the
road was practically impassable because of the destroyed vehicles
(including 730 tanks and tank destroyers out of an original force of
880). None of the Panzer divisions in Normandy escaped with more than
15 tanks. Out of the 56 infantry divisions that had fought west of the
Seine, 18 were utterly destroyed. Among those not captured were one
army commander, four corps commanders and 14 division commanders. The
German forces lost about 10,000 guns and vehicles. Only the 9th SS
Panzer Division Hohenstaufen and Panzerlehrdivision had more than 15
combat-ready tanks by August 22."
Heh heh...
Rightard queers...
It's amusing to bitchslap buttboy around.
1: Pappy goes, <SMAKK!!>
2: Buttboy squeals, "aiiiEEEEE!! QUIT IT! QUIT IT! I can't STAND it, Pappy."
<hyeh, hyeh, hyehhh>
You sound like the redneck rapist fags in Deliverance.
Do us a favor, and get back to being a -closet- queer.
You and Princess make quite a pair.
Heh heh...
Rightard fags...
Bwahahahahahahahhahahahaha!!!
Do yourself a favor.
My newsreader reads your posts for me so I rarely even see them.
You were DISMISSED.
You were DISMISSED because YOU ARE A PROVEN LIAR.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 08:03:07 -0700 (PDT), SilentOtto
<silen...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jun 17, 10:24 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> There isn't enough land on the planet for windmills to power us, there
>> isn't enough land or roof space on the planet for solar to power us,
>> and there isn't enough land on the planet to grow whatever biofuel
>> source can be dreamed up to power us.
>Germany...
>Small, cloudy Germany...
>Is slated to get 25% of their power from solar by 2020.
>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/04/AR2007050402466.html
You said: "Germany... is slated to get 25% of their power from solar
by 2020."
Your cite says: "For now, the technology remains expensive and barely
registers as a fraction of total energy production -- less than 0.5
percent. The government hopes to increase that figure to 3 percent by
2020."
YOU have been CAUGHT LYING.
You keep lying that I am black, Games, when I have told you repeated I
am not And you CANNOT cite anything anywhere on the Web or Usenet
where I have *ever* said I am black (because, you fucking asshole, I'm
not!).
Yet you fucking LIE on and on and on, while you SHRIEK at others who
you *claim* are lying.
Just about everything you have ever claimed about me is a blatant lie,
Milby. About the only thing you ever gotten right is I am man.
Everything else is just out of your twisted, fucked-up, delusional
view of "Reality",
YOU have been PROVEN TO LIE repeatedly -- as well as LYING about other
people supposed lying, Bob Milby, Jr.
Liar. Liar. Pants on fire. Nah nah.
-Tom Sr.
You don't know the definition of Eurotrash, do you?
BLP
> >No, WWII was not won by any single Rambo nation. No single nation could
> >stand against the Nazis. You didn't hear Roosevelt going around
> >denigrating "old Europe"
>
> Sorry, America had minor help beating the Nazis
You have no understanding of history, do you? We attacked the Nazis
after they had been weakened by a protracted disastrous fight against
the Russians.
BLP
Why is it that ultra-liberal anti-war Democrats always try to belittle
America and America's military and always omit this FACT about the
allegedly weakened German military: "the Soviet counter offensive was
halted at the Estonian border for 8 months by the German Armed
Forces."???
Eventually the Russians did beat THAT PORTION of the German military
IN THAT THEATRE. Which had NOTHING to do with America sweeping
through ALL OF EUROPE killing the rest of the Nazis.
That does not matter. What matter is the number that the Germans lost
due to Soviet action.
> Eventually the Russians did beat THAT PORTION of the German military
> IN THAT THEATRE. Which had NOTHING to do with America sweeping
> through ALL OF EUROPE killing the rest of the Nazis.
You really are ignorant. The Soviets (Russians and their local allies)
killed over 4 million German soldiers and held over 3 million as POWs.
Those losses did indeed weaken the German armed forces, not to mention
the losses in equipment. This put a serious hurt on the entire
military both in terms of manpower and in terms of armaments.
Military advice from someone such as yourself who is more interested
in trying to score political points rather than offering useful,
factual knowledge is the sort of crap that put us in such a poor pre-
surge position in Iraq. Thank God for the members of Congress who went
to the White House and bullied Bush into losing Rumsfeld and his
crappy advisors. And thank God you are not in a position to offer
political or military advice to anyone who matters.
BLP
Why is it that rabidly ignorant rightard queers, like you, always omit
the FACT that the only reason the Soviets were "halted" at the
Estonian border is because they shifted the schwerpunkt of their
offensives to the southern end of their line facing Romania and
Hungary, knocking both out of the war?
> Eventually the Russians did beat THAT PORTION of the German military
> IN THAT THEATRE. Which had NOTHING to do with America sweeping
> through ALL OF EUROPE killing the rest of the Nazis.
Reality has a well known liberal bias, Princess.
Heh heh...
Rightard queers...
The Germans fighting the Russians were NOT associated with America's
total liberation of the rest of Europe.
>> Eventually the Russians did beat THAT PORTION of the German military
>> IN THAT THEATRE. Which had NOTHING to do with America sweeping
>> through ALL OF EUROPE killing the rest of the Nazis.
>You really are ignorant. The Soviets (Russians and their local allies)
>killed over 4 million German soldiers and held over 3 million as POWs.
>Those losses did indeed weaken the German armed forces, not to mention
>the losses in equipment. This put a serious hurt on the entire
>military both in terms of manpower and in terms of armaments.
It weakened the German effort against the Russians it did not affect
anything else.
>Military advice from someone such as yourself who is more interested
>in trying to score political points rather than offering useful,
>factual knowledge is the sort of crap that put us in such a poor pre-
>surge position in Iraq. Thank God for the members of Congress who went
>to the White House and bullied Bush into losing Rumsfeld and his
>crappy advisors. And thank God you are not in a position to offer
>political or military advice to anyone who matters.
Bwahahahahhahahahaha!!!!
> >Those losses did indeed weaken the German armed forces, not to mention
> >the losses in equipment. This put a serious hurt on the entire
> >military both in terms of manpower and in terms of armaments.
>
> It weakened the German effort against the Russians it did not affect
> anything else.
How ignorant you are. Would you claim that our involvement in Iraq did
not affect our fighting ability anywhere else, like say, Afghanistan?
> >Military advice from someone such as yourself who is more interested
> >in trying to score political points rather than offering useful,
> >factual knowledge is the sort of crap that put us in such a poor pre-
> >surge position in Iraq. Thank God for the members of Congress who went
> >to the White House and bullied Bush into losing Rumsfeld and his
> >crappy advisors. And thank God you are not in a position to offer
> >political or military advice to anyone who matters.
>
> Bwahahahahhahahahaha!!!!
That nonsensical reply indicates that you either did not understand
what I just wrote, or are embarrassed because you have no reasonable
response.
Correct. Two SEPARATE theatres of War.
>> >Military advice from someone such as yourself who is more interested
>> >in trying to score political points rather than offering useful,
>> >factual knowledge is the sort of crap that put us in such a poor pre-
>> >surge position in Iraq. Thank God for the members of Congress who went
>> >to the White House and bullied Bush into losing Rumsfeld and his
>> >crappy advisors. And thank God you are not in a position to offer
>> >political or military advice to anyone who matters.
>> Bwahahahahhahahahaha!!!!
>That nonsensical reply indicates that you either did not understand
>what I just wrote, or are embarrassed because you have no reasonable
>response.
Try to pay attention.
Our initial invasion of Iraq was the single most successful military
invasion in RECORDED HUMAN HISTORY. We covered more ground, faster,
taking fewer casualities while causing more damage THAN ANY OTHER
MILITARY INVASION IN RECORDED HUMAN HISTORY.
If you had ANY military knowledge and/or experience you would have
known that. Obviously you lack both.
Clearly, Rumsfeld and his advisors performed EXTRAORDINARYILY in the
the pre-invasion planning and strategy. Clearly, our military
performed EXTRAORDINARYILY in the invasion. Clearly, there was
NOTHING wrong with the strategy, the plan, the invasion.
You said: "That nonsensical reply indicates that you either did not
understand what I just wrote, or are embarrassed because you have no
reasonable response."
My "reasonable response" is don't talk about what you don't know about
or you will get exposed.