Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Justices: Arizona voter registration rules go too far

1 view
Skip to first unread message

MattB .

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 2:04:18 PM6/17/13
to
Justices: Arizona voter registration rules go too far

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/06/17/supreme-court-arizona-voting-citizenship-states-congress-registration/2166965/

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled handily Monday that Arizona
cannot add to federal voter registration requirements by demanding
proof of citizenship.

The ruling, which could impact other states as well, is at least a
temporary victory for liberals who want to expand access to the polls
and a defeat for conservatives concerned about potential election
fraud.

In a 7-2 decision written by Justice Antonin Scalia, the court said
Arizona's proof of citizenship requirement -- passed by voters in 2004
-- went too far beyond the 1993 federal "motor voter" law that was
designed to simplify voter registration procedures.

The federal law requires registrants to claim U.S. citizenship on a
mail-in post card, under penalty of perjury. The Arizona law requires
separate physical proof of citizenship. The justices' decision upholds
congressional authority over federal elections and could make it
harder for states to impose additional restrictions.

However, Scalia said Arizona could try a different approach to
challenge the federal law's pre-emption, thereby holding out the
possibility that the state could resurrect its proof-of-citizenship
requirement.

*******************************

They could increase the jail time for any caught committing perjury.

Liberal are desperate when they need illegal Aliens to vote. They
don't have that right.

Lee

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 2:14:33 PM6/17/13
to
Liberals like....Anton Scalia?

Or didn't you notice who wrote the opinion?


MattB .

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 2:25:58 PM6/17/13
to
Well the Tea Party no doubt went to far in the other direction. Then
again do you think non US citizens should be allowed to vote?

Face it you can spy on every American in the country but can't ask for
proof of citizenship to vote.

I had to show several types of ID to get a drivers licence.

Lee

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 3:35:45 PM6/17/13
to
Have you actually read the opinion?



MattB .

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 3:40:54 PM6/17/13
to
The article of the whole opinion?

What I did see is they opened the way for them to try this again in a
less extreme way. Then again with the Tea Party types they have it
isn't likely. The Govenor had to fight with them to get them to
except free help with medicaid.

Tell me who challenged the law?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

MattB .

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 8:18:59 PM6/17/13
to
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:48:19 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:

>On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:40:54 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>> Face it you can spy on every American in the country but can't ask for
>>>> proof of citizenship to vote.
>>>
>>>
>>> Have you actually read the opinion?
>>>
>>>
>>The article of the whole opinion?
>
>We know you'd not do that---you need Faux snooze or limpballs to tell
>you what you want to hear....

Again the liberal lies. The article was from USA Today.
>
>>What I did see is they opened the way for them to try this again in a
>>less extreme way. Then again with the Tea Party types they have it
>>isn't likely. The Govenor had to fight with them to get them to
>>except free help with medicaid.
>
>You idiot
>
>The GOvernor was one of the Most vocal oppositionists to HC reform
>
>Remember?

Do you ever even read. Less liberal Rag more facts.

Here try some truth

Jan Brewer Signs Medicaid Expansion Law
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/17/jan-brewer-medicaid_n_3455171.html


>
>>Tell me who challenged the law?
>
>REAL AMERICANS


I agree real conservative Americans.

Read more facts less liberal rags. Have Diana help.

Now how is all this Bush's fault?

Zepp

unread,
Jun 17, 2013, 9:42:57 PM6/17/13
to
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:39:50 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:

> On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:04:18 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court ruled handily Monday that Arizona cannot
>>add to federal voter registration requirements by demanding proof of
>>citizenship.
>
> Which is only ONE of at least 22 different voter suppression laws
> enacted by state legislatures over the past 5 years.

Still, based on federal voting law perogative, it calls all the rest into
question.

Gronk

unread,
Jun 18, 2013, 11:41:36 AM6/18/13
to
They will pretty much fall like dominos.

Gronk

unread,
Jun 18, 2013, 11:46:26 AM6/18/13
to
Of course not. He is just a knee jerk GOPer.

The GOP is desperate for those votes. See this?


http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/17/lindsey-graham-gop-faces-demographic-death-spiral-without-immigration-reform/







RichTravsky

unread,
Jun 23, 2013, 5:09:45 PM6/23/13
to
Gronk wrote:
>

>
> The GOP is desperate for those votes. See this?
>
> http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/06/17/lindsey-graham-gop-faces-demographic-death-spiral-without-immigration-reform/

Now that's comedy!

Jesse from Breaking Bad

unread,
Jan 4, 2014, 2:16:36 PM1/4/14
to
Zepp wrote :
If you ask me, the USA is all about Guns and God. That's why women
shouldn't have the right to contraceptives, but have the right to own a
gun and shoot an American.

Ask the Nuns! They weren't speaking out in December 2013 when a crazy
ass NRA certified nut case killed children, but they're really serious
now that "The Pill" and condoms are on the line with the Obamacare
thing.

That's my America!
It's great that the USA keeps things in perspective.


0 new messages