rjsimm...@hotmail.com (Russell James Simmons) wrote:
>:|The atheist heterophobic demoncrat is a liar. He will lie to confuse >:|us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack >:|is psychological, but powerful. So don't listen, remember that, do not >:|listen.
All I saw you do is make unsubstantiated comments to which one could say:
Your unsubstantiated claim is noted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Ordinary or extraordinary claims require ordinary or extraordinary proof. If you're going to claim something and especially something outlandish you're going to need some pretty extraordinary and/or irrefutable proof to back up such a claim. "Where's the beef?" Where's the ordinary or extraordinary proof for their ordinary or extraordinary claims? If one is not responding with ordinary or extraordinary, *factual* proof, then the claim is not worth considering ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [ as Homer@nospam said] Why is asking for "proof" considered truculence? Do you consider it truculence for a judge to ask for evidence in a trial. Would you rather that people just testified that they believed in the guilt of the suspect? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- [as Gray Shockley said:] Your "opinion" is not an adequate citation. You forgot your citations. Or, are your opinions more valid than facts? You do realize, do you not?, that opinion without substantiation is just propaganda for those without critical thinking abilities and originate with those who are attempting to manipulate rather than those who are attempting to clarify. *****************************************************************
|
