Web Images Videos Maps News Shopping Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion The Rise of theTheocratic States of America
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
buckeye-...@nospam.net  
View profile  
 More options Nov 21 2004, 6:44 am
Newsgroups: alt.politics.kerry, alt.politics.bush, us.talk.constitution, talk.politics.misc, us.politics.elections, alt.politics.usa.constitution, alt.education
From: buckeye-...@nospam.net
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 06:44:37 -0500
Local: Sun, Nov 21 2004 6:44 am
Subject: Re: The Rise of theTheocratic States of America
rjsimm...@hotmail.com (Russell James Simmons) wrote:

>:|The atheist heterophobic demoncrat is a liar. He will lie to confuse
>:|us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack
>:|is psychological, but powerful. So don't listen, remember that, do not
>:|listen.

Gee, I didn't see you actually address this
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=35f3116e.0411081433.85...

or this:
The Rise of the theocratic States of America
PART I
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=bb4pp0lm0hk2il76h0hh8i...

PART II
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=ob4pp05pnknfl8hgl87m3p...

All I saw you do is make unsubstantiated comments to which one could say:

Your unsubstantiated claim is noted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
 Ordinary or extraordinary claims require ordinary or  extraordinary proof.
If you're going to claim something and especially something outlandish
you're going to need some pretty extraordinary and/or irrefutable proof to
back up such a claim.   "Where's the beef?"  Where's the ordinary or
extraordinary proof for their ordinary or extraordinary claims?  If one is
not responding with ordinary or extraordinary, *factual* proof, then the
claim is not worth considering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ as Homer@nospam said]
Why is asking for "proof" considered truculence? Do you consider it
truculence for a judge to ask for evidence in a trial. Would you rather
that
people just testified that they believed in the guilt of the suspect?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
[as Gray Shockley said:]
 Your "opinion" is not an  adequate citation.
You forgot your citations.
Or, are your opinions more valid than facts?
You do realize, do you not?, that opinion without substantiation is just
propaganda for those without critical thinking abilities and originate with
those who are attempting to manipulate rather than those who are attempting
to clarify.
*****************************************************************


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google