or this:
The Rise of the theocratic States of America
PART I
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=bb4pp0lm0hk2il76h0hh8i...

PART II
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&selm=ob4pp05pnknfl8hgl87m3p...

All I saw you do is make unsubstantiated comments to which one could say:

Your unsubstantiated claim is noted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
 Ordinary or extraordinary claims require ordinary or  extraordinary proof.
If you're going to claim something and especially something outlandish
you're going to need some pretty extraordinary and/or irrefutable proof to
back up such a claim.   "Where's the beef?"  Where's the ordinary or
extraordinary proof for their ordinary or extraordinary claims?  If one is
not responding with ordinary or extraordinary, *factual* proof, then the
claim is not worth considering
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[ as Homer@nospam said]
Why is asking for "proof" considered truculence? Do you consider it
truculence for a judge to ask for evidence in a trial. Would you rather
that
people just testified that they believed in the guilt of the suspect?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --
[as Gray Shockley said:]
 Your "opinion" is not an  adequate citation.
You forgot your citations.
Or, are your opinions more valid than facts?
You do realize, do you not?, that opinion without substantiation is just
propaganda for those without critical thinking abilities and originate with
those who are attempting to manipulate rather than those who are attempting
to clarify.
*****************************************************************