Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Islamic onslaught> Mosques & Madrasas r the Fith Column in India

0 views
Skip to first unread message

repo

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 11:09:22 AM8/18/08
to
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage&pid=251&page=2

The Islamic siege of India
By Dr Gautam Sen

India now exhibits all the political and psychological symptoms of a
defeated society. The unprecedented protests in Jammu have been
greeted with surprise across the board precisely because they are
exceptional. But the overall situation in India is dismaying.

The economic success of India in recent years and the resulting
additional resources at the disposal of the Indian State are not
relevant to the grievous outcome threatening it. These huge resources
are actually being used for electoral bribery or stolen and to
purchase arms that have little relevance for the prosecution of the
deadly internal war.

India is undergoing outright warfare, with its cities bombed at will
and massive infiltration across its borders. The Pakistani rationale
for cutting India down to size has rarely faltered since 1947 and
echoes a much older Islamic tradition. It stretches back a millennium
and reasserted itself the moment British usurpers of Islamic rule were
expelled by Hindus. Of course the Anglo-American imperialists and cold
warriors actively incited this diabolical outcome because they assumed
Islam would be an ally against Soviet communism and Nehru’s India
would not. The Arabs in general and the Saudis in particular
eventually become co-conspirators in the project to restore Islamic
primacy in the Indian subcontinent even if Hindus were to continue
ruling it nominally as vassals. They correctly perceive that the
ability to control and deploy India’s economic and demographic assets
will allow them to challenge the Christian West. The Saudis are the
main source of the catalytic funding for the jihad that is threatening
to break India’s political will and evidently succeeding. The Chinese
also became active after the mid-1950s in arming Pakistan and, more
recently, encouraging its bombing campaign of Indian cities to curb
the economic advance of India, which it regards as an irritating,
lowly rival.

Within India, some mosques and madrasas are the fifth column that
provides critical support for the aggression that it is encountering.
Their role is to cultivate passive and active support for the Islamic
onslaught. It entails ensuring that most Muslims refuse to co-operate
in efforts to interdict Islamic terrorists by remaining silent
spectators while the murderous bombings continue, provide safe havens
in impenetrable Muslim areas for terrorists and a vital element of
local manpower to the Pakistani and Saudi agencies engaged in
terrorist activities.

The deployment of Muslim votes strategically is also an important
aspect of their overall goals in order to make it impossible for
important Hindu families (rather than the nominal political
organisations that they preside over) to survive politically without
their consent. The economic sabotage of counterfeit currency produced
by Pakistani government agencies is another aspect of the Islamic
onslaught that has the virtue of making Indians themselves defray the
cost of jihad.

Indian themselves are profoundly complicit in the project that seems
destined to destroy their country and their civilisation. Two
underlying factors that have facilitated the rapid expansion of the
Islamic onslaught against India are its political culture and
constitutional arrangements. The first is the product of the bumbling
imbecility of the Gandhian project that de-legitimised the whole
notion of self-defence, on which all societies are founded and to
which the most important Hindu text is almost exclusively addressed.
And it was Pandit Nehru whose arrogance and intellectual mediocrity
accentuated and institutionalised this Gandhian self-destructiveness
in India’s political culture and national psyche. India’s
constitutional arrangements, again the product of the wilful ignorance
of its leaders, created a parliamentary democracy after independence
that guaranteed to highlight and deepen every division among its
citizens. In a presidential system, by contrast, Indians would have
been compelled to begin overcoming their multiple identities and the
potential divisions they incubated because the constituency for
president would have been a national one.

India now exhibits all the political and psychological symptoms of a
defeated society. The unprecedented protests in Jammu have been
greeted with surprise across the board precisely because they are
exceptional. But the overall situation in India is dismaying, with
virtually its entire political class overawed by the intimidatory
truculence of Islam, anxious not to provoke even if it entails
conceding the most fundamental norms of Indian society. The ascendant
media, harbouring crude Western aspirations and their concomitant
political interests, and elite higher education institutions dominated
by Christians are gleefully nurturing a deracinated Indian
establishment. Their purpose is to exercise influence over India by
completely dominating its intellectual life and of course continue
saving souls in the way it has done successfully by Christianising
South Korea.

The Islamic onslaught against India provides them with a window of
opportunity, by keeping India off balance and preventing the emergence
of a self-confident indigenous elite that might resist its imperialist
designs. This is why Islam and Christianity co-operate cynically over
what is becoming the spoils of a broken-backed India, postponing their
own competition with each other until they have destroyed all traces
of the civilisation of the Hindus first.

The economic success of India in recent years and the resulting
additional resources at the disposal of the Indian State are not
relevant to the grievous outcome threatening it. These huge resources
are actually being used for electoral bribery or stolen and to
purchase arms that have little relevance for the prosecution of the
deadly internal war against Islamic and other forms of terror.

Some of the terrorists have clearly formed a seamless political
alliance among themselves, with the Naxalites publicly declaring
support for Pakistani terrorists and no doubt benefiting from
Pakistani largesse. It may also be hazarded that many individuals,
media outlets and alleged human rights organisations are mere fronts
for terrorists and the evidence is in the public realm in some
important instances.

The armaments being purchased with uncharacteristic purposiveness by
the entire political class has some bearing on potential external
threats to Indian security, but one suspects that the alacrity with
which they are undertaken has much to do with spin-offs that result
from bribes. But most relevant of all is the failure of India’s
politicians to engage with conviction against internal terror by
deploying appropriate resources and motivating trained personnel
instead of hobbling them in the performance of their duties because of
apprehensions about losing Muslim votes.

The end is not necessarily going to take the shape of an invasion by
the rapist Pakistan army across the Punjab towards Delhi. In fact,
India’s demise and the retreat of Hindus will express itself as an
accentuation of trends and processes already underway, with occasional
dramatic departures that underline the calamity unfolding.

The expulsion of the Pandits, which failed to truly exercise even
India’s official nationalists, is a harbinger of the shape of things
to come. Hindus are likely to face expulsion from areas dominated by
Islam though some of it will occur and is occurring in a huge swathe
of eastern India because Hindus are voluntarily abandoning Muslim
areas for fear of consequences if riots occur.

These areas then come under implicit Pakistani rule under the guise of
the autonomy of Sharia practices and constitute bases for militant
activity against adjacent areas outside the immediate control of
Islam. As the political balance changes in favour of Islam, the Indian
political class will behave even more supinely, in a pattern that has
already become well established, further sealing the fate of India.
And with each success Islam will demand more, as it has increasingly
begun to do dramatically in less than four years.

The first major Indian city likely to come under the total sway of
Islam is Kolkata since its demographics are changing rapidly, with
whole areas being abandoned by Hindus and becoming ‘no-go’ Muslim
areas.

Bangladesh, which is contemptuous of Hindu India as a pushover denies
the very notion of infiltration because its Muslims never accepted the
legitimacy of the partition settlement. They believe that the Assam,
West Bengal that Jinnah originally demanded, should and will belong to
the Islamic Republic of Bangladesh. On this India’s communists
apparently concur with them! And if Bangladesh is able to frighten
Hindu India there is little hope for it in the face of enhanced joint
Saudi-Pak subversion that evidence of each Indian retreat is already
encouraging. Each terrorist bombing illustrates the helplessness of
India and the ease with which Hindus can be overawed by a handful of
determined mass murderers.


Jerry Kraus

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 11:31:21 AM8/18/08
to
On Aug 18, 10:09 am, repo <kcajy...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/modules.php?name=Content&pa=showpage...

I'm not really sure who has who under siege in India. Muslims and
Hindus have been competing for power for centuries there.

free....@gmail.com

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 11:33:07 AM8/18/08
to

Hindus and Muslims have been clashing in India for eons...i.e. Gandi
and the formation of Pakistan/Bangladesh. So what's new about this,
except your hatred of all Muslims?

repo

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 12:08:48 PM8/18/08
to
On Aug 18, 8:33 am, "free.tun...@gmail.com" <free.tun...@gmail.com>
wrote:

There's no "hate" here, but an awareness that
98% of all terrorist attacks are generated by
Muslims. It is Not Hindus, Buddist, Jews,
athiests, Christians,
ect that are 98% of terrorism in the world.

You can't even respond to the post, no rebuttals
at all. That's because there are no excuses for
the mass killing throughout the world done by Muslims.

- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

ßDoüg±Ç

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 5:32:40 PM8/18/08
to
"repo" <kcaj...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:73cb5672-534c-488b...@a8g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

Tuneup is obviously a muslim pig.


ßDoüg±Ç

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 5:34:27 PM8/18/08
to
<free....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d353d07a-7159-4760...@w7g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...

****************************
Who has been bombing whom in India ALi AL Fuckwad? Pigistan
(among others) has been sponsoring/harboring muslim terrorists
against India.

Pigistan has successfully cleansed itself of most non-muslimes.
It's just too bad the Hindus in India didn't do the same thing
to the muslime pigs (ditto for the Jews in Israel vis-a-vis the
Palassites).


Topaz

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 8:43:09 PM8/18/08
to

Spotlight on Zionist Shills: How to recognize Jewish surnames

The most powerful tool Zionists have is their relative invisibility -
they are very mixed and most appear gentile but use it to promote
Zionist interests, like islamophobia, War on Iraq/iran, diversity and
internationalism, while speaking as patriotic Americans with
American's interests at heart. It is a powerful strategy that has even
been used to trick Americans into fighting wars for Israel past and
present.

This list will help you identify potential zionist shills and make
proper judgements of their words and deeds where a bias may exist.

While this list may never be complete, it will cover most of the
Jewish names one is likely to encounter in everyday Western life.
Unlike many gentile names, there is such a thing as a 'Jewish name.'
Many Jewish persons can be recognized as being Jewish by their surname
[last name], although not always-some Jews are adopted, or their
forebears changed the family surname, or their surname simply does not
appear Jewish.
Here are the most common Jewish names likely to be encountered:

Names that sound "precious" (Gold, Silver, Diamond, Ruby (Rubenstein)
etc.)
Names ending in "-witz" (Horowitz, Rabinowitz, etc.) or "-itz"
(Kravitz, etc.)
Names ending in "-baum" (Teitelbaum, Metzenbaum, etc.)
Surnames that sound "Biblical," e.g., David, Joseph, Abram or Abraham,
Moses, Benjamin, Isaac, etc.

Some other common Jewish names:
Wolf
Myers
Mayer
Jacobs
Aaron
Hirsch
Tobias
Levy
Cohen
Kaplan
Weiss
Nathan
Leo
Levine
Simon
Levin
Samuel
Gould
Fink
Loeb
Loew
Rubin
Stern
Shapiro
Klein
Cohn
Singer
Frank
Schwartz
Kahn
Kramer

www.jewwatch.com

http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com

http://www.thebirdman.org http://www.nsm88.org

http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html

*us*

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 8:45:52 PM8/18/08
to
Bush and Cheney are the real terrorists.

br...@pobox.com

unread,
Aug 18, 2008, 8:48:37 PM8/18/08
to
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:43:09 -0500, Topaz <mars...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

I see that the Waffen SS Brigage, Tinfoil Hat Division isn't extinct
yet.

Too bad. I would have thought that such mindless trash would have
followed the dodo bird into history by now.

0 new messages