We have watched the video of the Kim beheading. It is among the most
gruesome things we've ever seen. Over a period of several minutes,
this young man - a Korean Christian missionary - pleads for mercy. "I
want to live," he cries repeatedly. His words are piercing, laden with
emotion. Three hooded Muslims standing behind him show no signs of
humanity. Armed with guns, a sword, and words, they are corrupted
beyond hope. The Islamic camera operator stops the video long enough
for his fellow Muslims to gag Kim so that the most dangerous of the
Islamic terrorists can justify their sadistic barbarism. The leader of
the pack confesses that he is a Muslim serving Muhammad and Allah and
that he is perpetrating his savagery in the name of Islam. After
denouncing Americans and Jews, one of the Muslims pulls out a sword
while the others force Kim onto his face, holding their feet against
his back. The sword wielding Muslim proceeds to cut off Kim's head as
the thugs with him shout with glee.
Kim's head is held by his hair, blood dripping onto his now severed
and mutilated body. And as gruesome as that is, what follows is the
most inhuman and ungodly act we've ever witnessed. One of the Muslims
chants "Allahu Akbar!" - Allah is Greatest as the men holding Kim's
head return the confession - "Allah Akbar!" Swinging Kim's decapitated
head before them. They shout "Allah Akbar!" another 14 times. This is
followed by an Islamic prayer in the mournful singing voice that is
used from their minarets.
The Buddhists do not have an Allah. The Catholics and Protestants
don't have an Allah either. Communists and Fascists don't commit
crimes claiming "Allah is Greatest." There is but one Allah. He
belongs to Islam. Muhammad created him in his own image - that is to
say he is as perverse, sadistic, immoral, deceitful, destructive, and
demonic as the men who cut off Kim's head. They were all good Muslims,
serving Satan and following Muhammad's example. If this conclusion is
shocking to you, I invite you to read Prophet of Doom - Islam's
Terrorist Dogma in Muhammad's Own Words.
Mr. Burkha, why would you follow a
religion that doesn't even believe in God,
but a made up "Allah" by your beloved
prophet Mohammed. It appears that
you worship Mohammed and not God.
Are you so troubled, angered that it makes
no difference what you believe as long as you
murder?
Mecca is located in the Hejaz region of what is today
Saudi Arabia. It is portrayed by traditional belief as a
wealthy trading center, full of merchants trading goods
by caravan from Yemen in the south and Syria and the
Byzantium empire in the north. Crone shows that Mecca
was in fact way off the incense route from Yemen to
Syria, which bypassed where Mecca is today by over
100 miles. Further, there is no mention whatever of
Mecca in contemporary non-Moslem sources:
For an increasing number of Islamic historians, the
tradition of Mohammed being the source and
explanation of the Arab Conquest, wherein Arab
tribesmen on horseback emerged out of the Arabian
deserts to conquer Syria, Mesopotamia, Persia,
Afghanistan, Egypt, Libya, and Spain in less than 80
years (636-712), stands history on its head. They
demonstrate that the story of Mohammed uniting
various Arab tribes like Genghiz Khan did for the
Mongols, and providing them with the religious
fervour to conquer in the name of Islam, is "sacred
history," rather than real history. Historian Gordon
Newby explains:
"The myth of an original orthodoxy from which later
challengers fall away as heretics is almost always the
retrospective assertion of a politically dominant
group whose aim is to establish their supremacy by
appeal to divine sanction."
This applies to the Arab Conquest, says al-Rawandi,
because for some two hundred years the Arab
conquerors were a minority amongst a non-Moslem
majority. For al-Rawandi, Islam is an invention for
the purpose of providing a religious justification for
Arab Imperialism. The Conquest is the reason and
explanation for Islam, not the other way around.
While there may well have been a historical
individual named Ubu'l Kassim who was later
entitled Mohammed ("The Praised One"), who raised
followers and participated in the initiation of the Arab
Conquest, he likely came from northeast Arabia in
what is now southern Jordan. The deity that Ubu'l
Kassim chose to follow was Allah, a contraction of
al-Lah, the ancient Arab God of the Moon [note:
which is why the symbol of Islam to this day is the
crescent moon]. Ubu'l Kassim died, however, some
years before the Arab Conquest was fully underway
(the traditional date is 632). Al-Rawandi summarizes
what then happened:
"Once the Arabs had acquired an empire, a coherent
religion was required in order to hold that empire
together and legitimize their rule. In a process that
involved a massive backreading of history, and in
conformity to the available Jewish and Christian
models, this meant they needed a revelation and a
revealer - a Prophet - whose life could serve at once
as a model for moral conduct and as a framework for
the appearance of the revelation. Hence (Ubu'l
Kassim was selected to be the Prophet), the Koran,
the Hadith (Sayings of the Prophet), and the Sira
were contrived and conjoined over a period of a
couple of centuries. Topographically, after a century
or so of Judaeo-Moslem monotheism centered on
Jerusalem, in order to make Islam distinctively
Arab... an inner Arabian biography of Mecca,
Medina, the Quraysh, the Prophet and his Hegira
(flight from Mecca to Medina alleged in 622, Year
One in the Islamic calendar) was created as a purely
literary artifact. An artifact, moreover, based not on
faithful memories of real events, but on the fertile
imaginations of Arab storytellers elaborating from
allusive references in Koranic texts, the canonical
text of the Koran not being fixed for nearly two
centuries." (p.104)
Al-Rawandi concludes that the Sira, the life of
Mohammed in Mecca and Medina is a myth, a
"baseless fiction." This is the conclusion of a
substantial number of serious academic historians
working on Islamic Studies today. They include
Mohammed Ibn al-Warraq, Mohammed Ibn
al-Rawandi, John Wansbrough, Kenneth Cragg,
Patricia Crone, Michael Cook, John Burton,
Andrew Rippin, Julian Baldick, Gerald Hawting,
and Suliman Bashear. Yet they and their research
are virtually unknown.
Thank you!
All gods were created by man, from Allah to Zeus. Yahweh, too.
Why do you follow a religion that doesn't even believe in Allah, but a made
up Jehovah and his prophet Jeezy?
Why would anyone believe in "Al-lah" the moon
god of the Arabs? Arabs don't even believe in
"Allah", but they do believe in Arab imperialism
wrapped around their creation called "Islam"
and have passed it off as a religion.
Are you one of those who bows to Arabs 5 times
daily, worshipping everything that comes from
Arabs? Do you eat like Arabs, do you practice
jihad like Arabs, do you speak Arabic, do you
dress like Arabs, ect? In a nutshell, are you
a clone of Arabs?
STFU, moron.
Why don't you fuck off and die.
•• Why don't you follow your own suggestion?
You're invited to join that asshole in HELL too.
>
>The Buddhists do not have an Allah. The Catholics and Protestants
>don't have an Allah either
Since the word "Allah" means "God", wrong.
No, you're wrong, Buddhists do not pray to Allah.
•• ROFLMAO
Since you are unable to contribute to the
discussion, why don't you take own advice?
•• Not so
Al-Lah was the ancient Arab moon god.
I'll contribute to your gravesite maintenance...
Shaddup you simpering slackwit!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah
Allah (Arabic: ????, Alla-h, IPA: [?al????h] pronunciation (help·info))
is the standard Arabic word for "God".[1] While the term is best known
in the West for its use by Muslims as a reference to God, it is used by
Arabic-speakers of all Abrahamic faiths, including Christians and Jews,
in reference to "God".[2][1][3] The term was also used by pagan Meccans
as a reference to the creator-god, possibly the supreme deity in
pre-Islamic Arabia.[4]
Catholics and Protestants do.
•• Wikipedia is not a reliable source particularly
where it involves middle east affaires.
---===o0o===---
---===o0o===---
While there may well have been a historical
individual named Ubu'l Kassim who was later
entitled Mohammed ("The Praised One"), who raised
followers and participated in the initiation of the Arab
Conquest, he likely came from northeast Arabia in
what is now southern Jordan. The deity that Ubu'l
Kassim chose to follow was Allah, a contraction of
al-Lah, the ancient Arab God of the Moon [note:
which is why the symbol of Islam to this day is the
crescent moon]. Ubu'l Kassim died, however, some
years before the Arab Conquest was fully underway
(the traditional date is 632). Al-Rawandi summarizes
what then happened:
[ ...]
http://spiritualsocialjustice.tribe.net/thread/c3a2801f-77b5-492b-b778-cde49456c600
Thanks for the laugh.
Why does anyone believe in any god? Why do Christians and Jews believe in
Yahweh? Hindus in Vishnu? Buddhists in the Buddha?
Why, in this advanced age of science and reason, are people still stupid
enough to believe in deities?
> Are you one of those who bows to Arabs 5 times
> daily,
Islam is every bit as much as sham as Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism,
Hinduism, Falun Gong, Scientology, Mormonism, or any other religion.
> Do you eat like Arabs
I do enjoy a nice falafel now and then.
Becuase I don't feel like it.
Nothing else comes close.
They've harmed America more than anyone else.
They're the worst enemies of the USA in the world today.
>... unable to contribute to the
> discussion ...
You're merely one of the dupes, bushfilth.
Islam isn't the problem.
Bush and Cheney are the problem.
Do it anyway, assburp!
You atheistic POS.
Because they have innate curiosity beyond the scope of science.
Why do you deny the possibility thereof, closed mind?
Intolerance?
Stupidity?
Should I entertain the possibility of leprechauns? Or Russell's teapot?
There is zero evidence of such. Or for gods, for that matter.
> Intolerance?
Reason.
> Stupidity?
Hey, I'm not the one who believes in imaginary skydaddies.
You got one part right. I am atheistic.
And of course we're the only sentient species in the universe too...lol...
>> Intolerance?
>
> Reason.
Bigotry.
>> Stupidity?
>
> Hey, I'm not the one who believes in imaginary skydaddies.
You merely deny anyone the intellectual freedom to engage concepts you
dislike.
Mind censor.
That's not how you spell 'stupid'.
By 'simple' people...
I can't imagine anyone ever made the mistake of calling Deepak Chopra
simple, but maybe you'd like to be first.
Deepak Chopra? That scamster?
Scumbag.
Ayup. There was a short in the wiring harness upstream from the PCM. I
woulda never found it. It took 3 hours for the boys at the Dodge Grodge to
find and correct it.
It's called Reality.
HTH.
Reality is no more than a transitory image of what our sensors can input.
As such it is only an approximation of the true values of the unified field.
$362.50
Back in the day, we useter double the voltage BRIEFLY, then watch for smoke.
Sometimes the short welded itself shut.
Still, cheaper than a new truck.
Risk way to play, silly old 6 volt systems were the first thing I'd toss
on restos.
LOL. Any proof a$$hat?
I personally know Catholics and they deny your lie, vociferously.
If by "Protestant" you mean Lutheran or Presbyterian,
I also know people of both denominations who also
vociferously deny your lie as well. I suppose if you're
a muslim pig, it's nice to think everyone else worships
your mad, Satanic god of genocidal hatred and intolerance,
but it's just not true -- except in your own delusional mind.
>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>news:kg8a84do058ueq112...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:13:21 -0700, "üDoug±Ç" <noün...@now.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"David Johnston" <da...@block.net> wrote in message
>>>news:ikv984p009bagaus1...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:14:26 -0700 (PDT), no human rights in ??lam
>>>> <Kcaj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>The Buddhists do not have an Allah. The Catholics and Protestants
>>>>>don't have an Allah either
>>>>
>>>> Since the word "Allah" means "God", wrong.
>>>
>>>No, you're wrong, Buddhists do not pray to Allah.
>>>
>>
>> Catholics and Protestants do.
>
>LOL. Any proof a$$hat?
>
>I personally know Catholics and they deny your lie, vociferously.
But not in Arabic.
In like manner, European history shows us a long list of names for the
Great Earth Mother: Gaia, Potnia, Hekate, Sophia, Brigit, Venus, Hera,
Juno, on and on. But they dont show us where people went to war in any
of these names. Even the Athenians, whose dominant temple was devoted to
Athena Parthenos sought Her advice, but went to war for real political
and economic reasons.
They've found a dozen neolithic Anatolian cities with the first images
of the Goddess showing Her worship goes back 10,000 years. But they dont
show us any evidence whatever that these cities ever warred with each
other. This is easy to understand when you consider the problems a
demagogue would have trying to rile up a mob or an army by claiming that
*he* speaks in *HER* name.
Allah, OTOH, has been much more useful.
> Allah, OTOH, has been much more useful.
Than what, diarrhea?
>In like manner, European history shows us a long list of names for the
>Great Earth Mother: Gaia, Potnia, Hekate, Sophia, Brigit, Venus, Hera,
>Juno, on and on. But they dont show us where people went to war in any
>of these names. Even the Athenians, whose dominant temple was devoted to
>Athena Parthenos sought Her advice, but went to war for real political
>and economic reasons.
>
Everyone goes to war for real political and economic reasons.
American Muslim leader Khalid Abdul Muhammad speaks about whites (2
minutes): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJh_mNXPw-E
The real Islam revealed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9qRwv39YCk
Muslims in America: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLK1Xpc7SMQ
Young Talib beheads Ghulam Nabi: http://tinyurl.com/2rb2e3
Why Muslims can't leave Islam (2 min. video):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP1sviJ_7BQ
More on Islamists
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMOZvbYJMvU
Obsession - Radical Islam's War Against the West:
(best parts, 11 minutes) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76STxsWJCCE
(rest, about 80 minutes): http://europenews.dk/en/node/5811
Wafa Sultan speaks about Islam (old but good):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xohIzs6xvfE
And sometimes, that gets out of hand. The first time Constantinople was
sacked, it was the Crusaders. That did not turn out to be in the
political and economic interest of the Byzantines.
Tamerlane was the last, and archetypal Islamic conquerer. He seems to
understand that you havta keep the goon squads used to build an empire
busy expanding it, or they will turn on each other. And if no Infidela
are handy, well then, he can say some Muslims are not practicing the
faith correctly. Thus he captured the Ottoman Sultan.
But he did not then go on an invade Europe because there was not, in his
view, enuf loot to keep his boys happy. It relates to Gibbon, who noted
the Romans all believed religion was true, the philosophers all thot
religion was false, and the politicians all knew religion was useful.
The Goddess religions were not very useful.
>David Johnston wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:07:24 -0500, Day Brown <dayb...@daybrown.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In like manner, European history shows us a long list of names for the
>>> Great Earth Mother: Gaia, Potnia, Hekate, Sophia, Brigit, Venus, Hera,
>>> Juno, on and on. But they dont show us where people went to war in any
>>> of these names. Even the Athenians, whose dominant temple was devoted to
>>> Athena Parthenos sought Her advice, but went to war for real political
>>> and economic reasons.
>>>
>>
>> Everyone goes to war for real political and economic reasons.
>Not everyone. the hypocritical power elite certainly plans wars for
>these reasons, but the grunts are driven by delusional propaganda.
>
>And sometimes, that gets out of hand. The first time Constantinople was
>sacked, it was the Crusaders. That did not turn out to be in the
>political and economic interest of the Byzantines.
But it was in the political and economic interest of the Crusaders...
Hmmmm. Interesting thought except for the ethnic cleansing the muslim pigs
practiced/practice in such places as:
i. Cyprus (the Turks didn't merely steal the land from Greece they destroyed
all
the churches there as well and replaced the local inhabitants w/Turkish
muslim
fucks
ii. Lebanon (at one time Lebanon was a majority Christian nation, but the
muslime
fucks have ethnically cleansed the country of most non-muslim pigs)
iii. Phillipines (the muslims there are deliberately and systematically
persecuting
non-muslims in a campaign of terror and ethnic cleansing)
iv. Bethleham (the CHristian populous has been all but eliminated)
The bushfilth is too unintelligent and cowardly
to grasp that concept.
You may find something of interest here:
http://www.wikiislam.com/wiki/History_of_Jihad
(I was really looking for something else -- a timeline up past to about 1300
or so, but this one is pretty good. What other "Holy" "Religion" marks its
progress by battles of conquest? The Saudi Peninsula of the 600s did not
become muslim because they though it is was a good idea.)
FACE
--
As the ships of the Ottoman Empire sailed off the Italian coast, raping
pillaging and destroying, Don Juan told the Italian assembly, "Gentlemen,
the time for discussion is over, the time for battle is upon us".
Maybe it's time for the decent people in the US to all move to a specific
state, gain political power in that state, secure all nuclear weapons
technology
and military assets, secede from the US, bulldoze all mosques, deport all
muslim fucks,
deport all muslim fuck sympathizers/collaborators/apologists [incl.
politicians, law enforcement
personnel, military personnel] and outlaw islam. Ironically, the muslim pig
fucks
have been doing the same thing all over the world, both today, as well as in
their past.
SOme things are worth dying for and fighting islamonazism is one of them.
Maybe the same could be said for some remaining decent, self-sufficient,
Western
style democracies in the world.
Give this one a thought and it will make sense in light of the islamic
jihad..........
"What if they gave a war and nobody came?
Why then, the war would come to you."
Bertolt Brecht 1898-1956
Its not how to wait for Mr. Wright, but how to get the most pleasure
from whatever sex she is already having. Come to think of it, the first
great democratic empire was also known for the number of dykes and sluts
in Athens.
Well. The next time they pick up a suspect, throw his ass in a
whorehouse, not a prison, and after a few dozen of the girls have fucked
him, he'll forget all about Mohammet's 12 year old virgins, and tell the
madam there anything she wants to know about what his friends have been
up to.
The history is obscure, the warrior elites would prefer we not know
about it, but is, when you find it, compelling. The witches of Dacia
sent girls into the Roman camps, and somehow, the witches always knew
when the Roman Legions were coming. The Romans tried to conquer Dacia,
what we now know as Romania, for hundreds of years, but held it for only
50. And even then, while Caesar could go wherever he wanted, he needed a
large armed cavalry to make sure he could get back.
And when the women combine sex with powerful psychedelic potions, newer
brain scans, EEG, and even Dr. Paul Ekman's microexpression techniques
to detect deception, the war on terror will be over. The only reason it
has gone on this long is that they didnt want to win it, they wanted to
milk it.
>David Johnston wrote:
The excuse is not the reason. The Crusaders were largely in it for
the loot, hence the looting.
Great quote FACE, it really sums up the present situation we're facing
w/the spread of islamonazism. They aren't going to stop until they've
acheived their goals, only fools believe endless appeasement will
satisfy they muslims. What really proves your point FACE is that
muslim immigration hasn't made ANY country a better place -- only
worse.
Yes, appeasement stinks. A big stick is the only thing Muslims
understand well. Proven by history
Who've done harm to your brain, pigfucker?
They're robbing American taxpayers of
billions of dollars.
They betray GIs with their lies.
**The harm to the USA is being done by
**the traitors Bush and Cheney.
**They betray GIs with their lies.
You betrayed your camels when you left them behind , stupid sand
monkey. Go back to your desert read your Quran, drink camel's urine,
fuck your goats , molest little girls , do what you are good at. GIs
don't need Muslim Satan's advocates.
They betray GIs with their lies.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>... molest little girls ...
You shouldn't do that, or support those who do that.
Obviously you weren't testing electronics dimbulb.
Then why don't you condemn your prophet Mo for his brazen pedophilia,
Muslim pervert?
They betray GIs with their lies.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>... molest little girls ...
You shouldn't do that, or support those who do that.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:53:01 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>...brazen pedophilia ...
You admire it because you're not emotionally well.
>...brazen pedophilia ...
**You admire it because you're not emotionally well.
I am not a Muslim, cretin. Pedophilia is your national sport in your
filthy Muslimdom.
They betray GIs with their lies.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>... molest little girls ...
You shouldn't do that, or support those who do that.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:53:01 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>...brazen pedophilia ...
You admire it because you're not emotionally well.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:12:19 -0700 (PDT), stat...@lycos.com wrote:
>...cretin. Pedophilia ...
Nobody had asked about you.