Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: France: "Muslims not welcome"

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Mosquebuster

unread,
Apr 22, 2006, 8:07:16 PM4/22/06
to
"Islam is COLLAPSING!" <IslamisC...@iic.org> wrote in message
news:v8x2g.48$VT7...@fe04.lga...
> http://newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/4/7/110407.shtml?s=lh

Leave your sproggen at home, Akhmed: "Immigrant labor rebuilt this country
after the war.." Yeah, and the war's long over and the country's been
rebuilt, so go back where you came from ---
_________________________________________________________

France Wants to 'Choose' Its Immigrants

Friday, April 7, 2006 11:01 a.m. EDT

The curtain falls on a bevy of near-naked dancers in feathered headdresses,
and Adir Rafael Pires glides into action. As a set-changer at the Lido, the
racy cabaret on Paris' Champs-Elysees, Pires could not be farther from his
desert birthplace: Cape Verde, a rocky, drought-stricken archipelago off
West Africa's coast.

But the door that allowed Pires to make France his home may now be closing.
France, like other European countries, is taking a harder look at the
immigrants it lets in.

The drive toward "selective" immigration is inspired by electoral politics,
by fears that some immigrants are not integrating and may even be vectors
for terrorism and militant Islam, and by widely shared concerns that
immigrants overtax welfare systems and compete for scarce jobs.

French Interior Minister and presidential hopeful Nicolas Sarkozy championed
a bill that would make it more difficult for poor immigrants with little
education and few skills to start a new life in France - long one of
Europe's most coveted destinations for immigrants.

Pires, 24, reached the ultimate goal - acquiring French nationality - at a
naturalization ceremony last month after spending more than half his life
here - much of it as an illegal immigrant.
Hi mother, Vitalina, came to France in 1990 on a tourist visa, then stayed
on as a live-in maid with a Parisian family. Pires visited her for summer
vacation, and never returned to Cape Verde.

Nearly sixteen years later, mother and son became French thanks to a
provision that allows foreigners to apply for citizenship after 10 years in
the country - even if they were here illegally.

That is one of many immigrant-friendly provisions that would be scrapped
under Sarkozy's immigration bill.

Sarkozy, whose father immigrated here from Hungary, argues that France
should take a more pro-active approach to immigration by hand-picking
foreign workers. His arguments gained resonance after riots ripped through
heavily immigrant French suburbs last fall.

Sarkozy acknowledges that he wants to court voters away from the far right,
which argued that the riots showed the perils of immigration.
If passed, the law would form part of France's multi-pronged offensive
against clandestine immigration that also includes stepped-up border
controls and deportations. Under Sarkozy, deportations have increased 72
percent over the past two years, with a record 20,000 illegal immigrants
expelled in 2005.

"France cannot be the only country in the world that refuses to adapt its
immigration policy to its economic needs and its capacity to absorb new
arrivals," Sarkozy said recently. "We cannot continue to welcome people whom
we have neither jobs nor housing to offer."

Pires spent most of his first year in France in a cramped apartment he
shared with one of his mother's friends. He did not attend school, but
learned French from watching daytime television. He saw his mother on
weekends.

When another friend offered Vitalina an unheated attic room, mother and son
moved in together. They shared the kitchen-less, 110-square-foot room for
nearly seven years.

Still, it was a step up from Sao Vicente, one of nine desert islands that
make up the former Portuguese colony of Cape Verde and the one where Pires
was born. The country's economy relies largely on foreign aid and
remittances from emigrants - which accounted for more than 20 percent of the
GDP in 2005.

Pires does not send money back. There is no one left to send it to. After he
and Vitalina left, Pires' estranged father decamped, too. He now lives in
Amsterdam, and has become a Dutch citizen. Most of Pires' other relatives
live in Europe or Brazil.

Under Sarkozy's draft bill, foreigners would have a harder time bringing
their families to France. Immigrants would have to prove that their salaries
alone - and not government subsidies - suffice to support their offspring.

Pires says that if his mother had been subjected to such stringent
requirements, she wouldn't have made the cut.

"Her salary was really low," he said.

Sponsored by his mother's French friend, Pires enrolled in school.

After a teacher told him he "wasn't college material," he opted to attend a
technical high school where he specialized in operating theater sets. That
led to the job at the Lido, where long-legged dancers cancan, nude but for
strategically placed feathers.

"Here, I have the life of an average European - which I finally am," he
said.

While it would target people like Pires and Vitalina, the immigration bill
would favor a new breed of "highly qualified" workers who - with their
higher degrees and sought-after skills - could just as easily move to New
York or Toronto as Paris.

"'Highly qualified' is just a code word for rich," Pires said. He called a
provision that would establish a renewable, three-year residence permit
based on capacity and talent "a ploy to keep out the poor."

"Immigrant labor rebuilt this country after the war," he said. "It's not
right to try to exclude us now."

gringogirl

unread,
Apr 22, 2006, 8:18:22 PM4/22/06
to
send the algerians home! i mean they have a home and if they would
quit slitting each other's throats they might even enjoy it there- what
is this insane delusion that the West must take in all the peoples of
the rest of the world? is it too much to ask that they use birth
control and .... develop a way of living that makes life bearable in
their own countries- and then of course they want the good parts of the
west and then wish to revert to their barbaric ways - too

Gary Rumain

unread,
Apr 23, 2006, 6:11:25 PM4/23/06
to
The Frogs say "muzzies go home!"

Americano

unread,
Apr 23, 2006, 6:16:48 PM4/23/06
to
What are the folks in England saying?

Gary Rumain

unread,
Apr 23, 2006, 10:46:19 PM4/23/06
to
"Oi! muzzies! On yer bike!"?

Harbin

unread,
Apr 24, 2006, 1:14:04 AM4/24/06
to
>
> "'Highly qualified' is just a code word for rich," Pires said. He called a
> provision that would establish a renewable, three-year residence permit
> based on capacity and talent "a ploy to keep out the poor."
>
> "Immigrant labor rebuilt this country after the war," he said. "It's not
> right to try to exclude us now."


Hey.... where have I heard this before? It seem only immigrant labor
is the only way to build, or rebuild a country. Guess all the natives
are just sitting on there asses. Maybe immigrants should rebuild their
own country.

--
SeeYaa:) Harbin Osteen KG6URO

This is YOUR future:
http://halturnershow.com/aztlan_caps.wmv
http://media.putfile.com/La-Gran-Marcha
The Mexican Solution:
http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/index.jsp?section=papers&code=06-D_18

-


gringogirl

unread,
Apr 24, 2006, 2:15:09 AM4/24/06
to


Hey.... where have I heard this before? It seem only immigrant
labor
is the only way to build, or rebuild a country. Guess all the natives
are just sitting on there asses. Maybe immigrants should rebuild their
own country.

that is so apt and funny. its like having roomates- welll you broke my
coffee maker so I get to use your bathtowels.....how to rationalize
away any residue of guilt they might have for being here illegally--
--

Gary Rumain

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 1:10:53 AM4/25/06
to
Have you actually been to any muzzie countries? They do bugger all. The
ones who migrated to Europe sit on their asses and collect dhimmi
^H^H^H^H^H welfare.

SIRKNIGHT67_shits_on_mo-ham-MAD

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 3:31:28 AM4/25/06
to
France's biggest mistake was to employ so many colonia troops in World
War II. Considering that France was considered one of the chief palyers
in the second world war, they only lost about 170,000 military personel
on the allied side (with about 40,000 on the Axis side which pretty
much shows French loyalties) as opposed to about 22,000 colonial
troops, mainly Morroccan and Algerians. Most of the so-called
"free-french" forces fighting in Itally against Italian and German
troops in 1944-45 were colonials. France's policy of incorporation of
former colonials into its society failed miserably after world war II.

The French were far less successful in incorporating their mohammedan
colonials than the British for some reason and that accounted for the
daily clashes with Algerians and Africans in general. I grew up in
France (unfortunately) and went to school there for nearly 10 years.
Don't think that the high rate of mohammedans in France is because the
french are welcoming. That couldn't be further from the truth. In fact,
the froggies don't like anyone other than their stkining selves. What
you see, is the disastrous integration and globalist policies of shy
politicians who had no balls when facing the left wing marxist assholes
that helped open the doors to all the trash of the islamo-fascist
world.

Before I left France in 1979, parts of the "Banlieux" were already
going to shit. Now. it's far worse and entire areas are totalyl "Zoned"
and native people don't dare step near the neighborhood inhabited by
islamo-fascists. This is just another instance of french politicians
whoring themselves to oil producing arab nations, by allowing their
islamo-fascist populations to settle there, get government subsidies
and whine endlessly about racism, and let them form mini-islamofascist
hells on french territory, in order to strike commercial and military
deals with the oil-producing nations.

Europe's political whores have completely sold their continent to such
trash.

SIRKNIGHT67_shits_on_mo-ham-MAD

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 3:37:18 AM4/25/06
to
muslims in europe are the shitties, laziest and sorriest sacks of shit
I have ever seen. I lived there for ten years. I know France and been
to Geramny and other parts as well. You have entire ghettos of
non-integrated arab scumbags, along with Africans, Pakistanese and
others that stink of shit, and where people don't dare go at night. The
neighborhoods have been so badly defaced and sabotaged taht you would
think you are treading on some midlde eastern "Souk" , market where
meat is slaughtered and distributed in the street.

People keep talking of democracy and integration, having little
appreciation for the gap of maturity and civlizations between west and
islamo-fascist worlds. Those mohammedans are simply PIGS and animals.
If anyone would care to actually get to know their cultures and see how
they are towards outsiders, instead of listening to skinny wanna-be
marxist pigshit hippie white college kids pissed off at mom and dad's
SUV driving, champagne toasting rich friends, the the whole world would
realize that there are two things to do immediately and without delay:

1) kick each and every practicing mohammedan cultist out of the west
2) go to war with them and exterminate every man woman and child
amongst them, because that is exactly what their plans and goals are,
never mind the bullshit from left wing dickwads that haven't got a clue
about what islamo-fascism really is, never mind read the koran or lived
among mohammedan cultists.

Americano

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 6:24:43 AM4/25/06
to
France, and Europe, in general, have about the same two
chances of getting rid of their muslims, as the US does
of sending it's illegal Mexicans home, slim and none.

SIRKNIGHT67_shits_on_mo-ham-MAD

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 11:13:27 AM4/25/06
to
France and europe have one advantage over the US, that their SKINHEADS
and Neo-Nazis don't give a flying fuck about political correctness and
when the time comes, it will be a barbecue season for any fat lipped,
kinky haired mohammedan sandnigger

Gary Rumain

unread,
Apr 25, 2006, 5:52:12 PM4/25/06
to
There is always a chance. There are plenty of rednecks in the US. Too
bad the wetbacks and muzzies don't live near them. But wetbacks aren't
so bad. We need them to do all the dirty work. The muzzies won't do
that. The muzzies won't do anything. We should kick them out. Probably
use the wetbacks to do it! LOL!! Give them a green card as a reward.

azali

unread,
May 5, 2006, 2:32:43 AM5/5/06
to
all this hate statement against immigrant got me to ponder if the red
indians would consider the european who set foot in America as illegal
immigrants? At least your immigrant did not massacre the locals into
submission like Custer n the others did..

vjp...@at.biostrategist.dot.dot.com

unread,
May 5, 2006, 3:39:23 AM5/5/06
to

What about Archduke France's Mitterand flying into Sarajevo for
1993 New Years replete with Manhattan life chain? Gosh, that's were
all the Boznian Cathars got into promoting the daVinci Code!


- = -
Vasos-Peter John Panagiotopoulos II, Reagan Mozart Pindus BioStrategist
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/vjp2/vasos.htm
---{Nothing herein constitutes advice. Everything fully disclaimed.}---
[Ignore webs which don't work with http://lynx.browser.org/]
[Regulation begets corruption] [Urb Sprawl confounds terror]
[Homeland Security means private firearms not lazy obstructive guards]

Americano

unread,
May 5, 2006, 6:37:00 AM5/5/06
to
all this hate statement against immigrant got me to ponder if the red
indians would consider the european who set foot in America as illegal
immigrants? At least your immigrant did not massacre the locals into
submission like Custer n the others did..


==========================================================

American Indians did not just pop up out of the ground. The also
immigrated
to North American via the Bering Straights.

They just got here sooner than the Europeans, but failed to advance
their civilization
much past the stone age.

Regarding Custer, For your information, he lost big time at "The battle
of Little Bighorn".

Joking You

unread,
May 5, 2006, 10:44:55 AM5/5/06
to

"Americano" <chee...@fastmail.fm> wrote in message
news:1146825420.1...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Latinos have some nerve complaining about immigration. Talk about calling
the kettle black. And what are most Latinos? Latinos are the offspring of
Spaniards and Indians. If anyone should be upset it is the Mayans, Aztecs,
Incas and other indigenous natives who should be protesting against Spain
and demanding the decendents of these invaders leave.


SIRKNIGHT67_shits_on_mo-ham-MAD

unread,
May 16, 2006, 8:29:28 AM5/16/06
to
there's no such thing as "Red Indians". The American Indians you see
today are mostly (not all) the descendants of Siberians who migrated
across Beringia some 6,000 years ago, and for the most part, wiped out
two races of people, one of which is almost completely extinct today,
save for the Ainu of Japan who were their distant relatives (I am
talking about the men of Kennewick, Stick etc...), though every once in
a while, you see Pacific Islander/Ainoid traits show up among Central
American Indians.

Furthermore, your so-called "red indians" wiped out an entire race of
Australoid people, the ancestors of the "Luzia" people in South
America, who sailed across the Pacific Ocean some 30,000 years ago, so
as far as Europeans "stealing" the land, that is an outdated and
erroneous version that is no longer taught in schools, but perhaps
still in the left wing self hating marxist circles.

Besides, studies of chromosomes and haplogroups have shown that between
20-25,000 years ago, CAUCASOID EUROPEANS of the Solutrean tool culture
trekked across the ice that connected Canada and the UK and ended up in
the North East US and Great Lakes area, BEFORE the so-called "red
indians" even set foot onto the American continent, in fact, the
Mongoloid race (ancestors of your "red indians" who murdered the
earliest inhabitants who were Pacific Islanders and Australoids) was
just barely coming into existence 18,000 years ago.

So in order to make a point in the future, try at least to EDUCATE
YOURSELF and keep up to date instead of sounding like the jack ass you
are. And as for Custer, he did not massacre the native people of
America, because first of all, the Cheyenne you are refering to were
not Native o North America but to Siberia, and second, because the
battle of the Wachita River involved the killing of a few hundred
Cheyenne, a far cry from any genocide you are trying to stick on the
American people, in order to excuse the violent and disgusting abuses
of islamo-fascist arabian pigs that murdered and raped tens of
thousands of Zoroastrians, Hindus and Christians across Asia..

SIRKNIGHT67_shits_on_mo-ham-MAD

unread,
May 16, 2006, 8:35:35 AM5/16/06
to
Actually they didn't. American Indians murdered and annihiliated the
actual native people of these two continent, and the discovery of
different races of people preceding the so-called "native" Americans
since the 1990's thanks to Forensic science and DNA, ahve shown that
the American continents were inhabited by three races of people who
came in different waves including

1) An Ainuid/Pacific Islander people, represented by the famous
"Kennewick" Man
2) An Australoid type related to Melanesians, Aborigines and Papuans,
as exeplified by the discoveries of skeletons such as "Luzia" in
Brazil, who were wiped out in a race war (their cave art shows black
skinne dpeople raising their hands and foreigners showering them with
arrows)
3) A WHITE people whose genes and physical features were still very
much observable when the English came to N.America and noticed the
ressemblence of many of the Great Lakes tribes to northwestern European
natives of the Cro-Magnon/Brunn racial type largely present still among
Irish, Island Scots, Germans and Norwegians and Dutch. These were
descendants of people from the Solutre culture who trekked, in a way
similar to the Eskimos trekking across ice sheets to the North Pole,
some 20,000 years ago.

These imbecile mohammedan PIGS love to stick any garbage they can on
America, not mentioning of course the violent colonization and forced
arabization of conquered people such as the Berbers of North Africa,
the people of Sudan, and the unsuccessful arabization of Iranians
though native languages and cultures were forbidden and almost wiped
out.

0 new messages