"In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise."
How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
-- Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism ideology enforced upon the white world against the will of its peoples, leading to mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + pol-corr = lethal mixture for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle all surveillance technology.
Paranoia is an unfounded or exaggerated distrust of others, sometimes reaching delusional proportions. Paranoid individuals constantly suspect the motives of those around them, and believe that certain individuals, or people in general, are "out to get them."
Description
Paranoid perceptions and behavior may appear as features of a number of mental illnesses, including depression and dementia, but are most prominent in three types of psychological disorders: paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorder (persecutory type), and paranoid personality disorder (PPD).
Individuals with paranoid schizophrenia and persecutory delusional disorder experience what is known as persecutory delusions: an irrational, yet unshakable, belief that someone is plotting against them. Persecutory delusions in paranoid schizophrenia are bizarre, sometimes grandiose, and often accompanied by auditory hallucinations. Delusions experienced by individuals with delusional disorder are more plausible than those experienced by paranoid schizophrenics; not bizarre, though still unjustified. Individuals with delusional disorder may seem offbeat or quirky rather than mentally ill, and, as such, may never seek treatment.
Persons with paranoid personality disorder tend to be self-centered, self-important, defensive, and emotionally distant. Their paranoia manifests itself in constant suspicions rather than full-blown delusions. The disorder often impedes social and personal relationships and career advancement. Some individuals with PPD are described as "litigious," as they are constantly initiating frivolous law suits. PPD is more common in men than in women, and typically begins in early adulthood.
— Paula Anne Ford-Martin
Answers.com
Questions Reference
Dictionary: par·a·noi·a (păr'ə-noi'ə) pronunciation Home > Library > Literature & Language > Dictionary n.
1. A psychotic disorder characterized by delusions of persecution with or without grandeur, often strenuously defended with apparent logic and reason. 2. Extreme, irrational distrust of others. -------------------
Seek professional help Helicopter Michi, who knows it might be not too late after all!
__________________________________ Wer ist "Hubschrauber" Michael Laudahn? Ein Sozialabzocker und Asylant da in Dänemark.... UseNet Spammer, Nazi, mehr scheinst du Wixer nicht zu sein.
<> - - - - - - <> Proudly introducing the concept of HATE to the World <> 'Freedom of speech - abuse it and then ban it!
(The above is an excerpt from Helicopter Michi's membership application sent to the Danish Branch of the Grand United European Neo and Traditional Nazi Boys Club.)
Ördög (Your scary shadow that says "Boo" in the dark) Either the neocons go or civilisation does! Fup wie ich empfinde es angebracht!
> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have > lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have > segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and > tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is > founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within > a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to > death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not > exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than > 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will > dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives > and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude > them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the > fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting > houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not > exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your > graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they > will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never > be otherwise."
> How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. > Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
> Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are > terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge > of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
> -- > Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism > ideology enforced upon the white world against the will of its > peoples, leading to mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + > pol-corr = lethal > mixture for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle > all surveillance technology.
Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: > "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have > lowered its moral tone,
I do,n't agree, on the contrary, Jews are often very cultured and intelligent.
> depreciated its commercial integrity; have > segregated themselves and not been assimilated;
True enough but is it really important?
> have sneered at and > tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is > founded by objecting to its restrictions:
Hmmm, not sure on that one. I've never seen much proselytism from the Jews nor attacks on Chrisitianity.
>have built up a state within > a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to > death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.
When was this, 1800 or so? This is 2008 old chap, things gave changed.
> If you do not > exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than > 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will > dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives > and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude > them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the > fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting > houses rubbing their hands.
Absolute complete and utter bollocks.Have you looked at their level of fertility and fecundation?
> I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not > exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your > graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they > will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never > be otherwise."
Bof, an idea from a long time ago that doesn't really apply to today. I'd acept that there is a 'Jewish lobby' and that in certain areas they are well implanted but I don't think there is some dastardly plot to wipe out the goyim.
> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have > lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have > segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and > tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is > founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within > a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to > death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not > exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than > 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will > dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives > and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude > them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the > fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting > houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not > exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your > graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they > will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never > be otherwise."
> How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. > Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
> Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are > terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge > of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
> -- > Give us back our countries: Stop the criminal multiculturalism > ideology enforced upon the white world against the will of its > peoples, leading to mass immigration from the third-world: Mul-cul + > pol-corr = lethal > mixture for the white world. And give us back our freedom: Dismantle > all surveillance technology.
> Michael Laudahn eOpposition wrote: >> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have >> lowered its moral tone,
> I do,n't agree, on the contrary, Jews are often very cultured and > intelligent.
>> depreciated its commercial integrity; have >> segregated themselves and not been assimilated;
> True enough but is it really important?
>> have sneered at and >> tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is >> founded by objecting to its restrictions:
> Hmmm, not sure on that one. I've never seen much proselytism from the Jews > nor attacks on Chrisitianity.
>>have built up a state within >> a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to >> death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal.
> When was this, 1800 or so? This is 2008 old chap, things gave changed.
>> If you do not >> exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than >> 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will >> dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives >> and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude >> them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the >> fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting >> houses rubbing their hands.
> Absolute complete and utter bollocks.Have you looked at their level of > fertility and fecundation?
>> I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not >> exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your >> graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they >> will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never >> be otherwise."
> Bof, an idea from a long time ago that doesn't really apply to today. I'd > acept that there is a 'Jewish lobby' and that in certain areas they are > well implanted but I don't think there is some dastardly plot to wipe out > the goyim.
Michael wants to be another Hitler. His final solution is to kill all Jews and all Muslims. His psychiatrist should give him an overdose.
>"In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have >lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have >segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and >tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is >founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within >a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to >death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not >exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than >200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will >dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives >and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude >them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the >fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting >houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not >exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your >graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they >will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never >be otherwise."
>How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. >Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
>Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are >terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge >of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
"Franklin is reported as saying..."
Another way of saying, "The other office Nazi told me this while standing around the water cooler."
A common expression in Dublin during the Hitler war years was " If there was one good thing Hitler did, it was to get rid of the Jews". It is also recorded in a speech by Oliver Flanagan T D in the Dail in 1943.
> How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. > Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
> Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are > terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge > of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
The "Franklin Prophecy" was published in the February 3, 1934 edition of the weekly newspaper <I>Liberation</I>, published by American Nazi leader William Dudley Pelley. Pelley, a former newspaper reporter, is suspected of being the author of the forgery...
The eminent American historian Charles Beard investigated the "Franklin Prophecy." He could find no copy of Pickney's diary or even any reference to it in the Library of Congress, the National Archives, the Franklin Institute, or other historical libraries. Nor was there any reference to Franklin having made such a speech. 16 November 2007
The "Franklin Prophecy" 70-year-old forgery continues to circulate
The so-called "Franklin Prophecy," which continues to appear in various countries, is an anti-Jewish forgery that first appeared in the United States in 1934. Shortly thereafter, it was revealed to be a phony document.
The "Franklin Prophecy" claims that during the 1787 Constitutional Convention, American founding father Benjamin Franklin made a speech in which he warned against Jewish influence in America and proposed that Jews be expelled from the United States. The speech allegedly was found in the diary of a convention delegate, Charles Coatesworth Pickney of South Carolina.
The eminent American historian Charles Beard investigated the "Franklin Prophecy." He could find no copy of Pickney's diary or even any reference to it in the Library of Congress, the National Archives, the Franklin Institute, or other historical libraries. Nor was there any reference to Franklin having made such a speech. In 1935, Beard wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE>I cannot find a single original source that gives the slightest justification for believing that the Prophecy is anything more than a barefaced forgery. Not a word have I discovered in Franklin's letters and papers expressing any such sentiments against the Jews as are ascribed to him .. His well-known liberality in matters of religious opinion would, in fact, have precluded the kind of utterances put in his mouth by this palpable forgery . . . In his writings on immigration, Franklin made no mention of discrimination against Jews. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Part of the "Franklin Prophecy" claimed that Franklin had said:
<BLOCKQUOTE>For more than 1700 years, [the Jews] have lamented their sorrowful fate - namely, that they have been driven out of their homeland; but, gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find pressing reason for not returning there. </BLOCKQUOTE>
Beard noted, with regard to this sentence and the "Prophecy" in general:
<BLOCKQUOTE>the phraseology of the alleged Prophecy is not that of the 18th century; nor is the language that of Franklin. It contains certain words that belong to contemporary [Nazi] Germany rather than America of Franklin's period. For example, the word "homeland" was not employed by Jews in Franklin's time. It was created in connection with the Palestine mandate. </BLOCKQUOTE>
In other words, the passage referring to a "homeland" for the Jews in Palestine could only have been written after this idea was first suggested in the mid-1800s - well after the 1787 Constitutional Convention.
Beard also noted that Franklin held Jews in high regard, citing the fact that Franklin contributed five pounds to the Hebrew Society of Philadelphia when it was raising money for a synagogue and signing an appeal for contributions to the synagogue from "citizens of every religious denomination."
Other historians and experts agree the "Prophecy" was a forgery. J. Henry Smythe, Jr., author of <I>The Amazing Benjamin Franklin</I>, said it was "a counterfeit," stating, "I have investigated this calumny and find no historical basis." The librarian of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania, Julian P. Boyd, came to the same conclusion. Another Franklin biographer, Carl Van Doren,...
sama bin Laden referred to Pelley's "Franklin Prophecy" forgery in his 2002 "Letter to the American People," in which he complained about supposed Jewish power in America, stating that this is "precisely what Benjamin Franklin warned you against."
Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov
>"In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have >lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have >segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and >tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is >founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within >a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to >death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not >exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than >200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will >dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives >and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude >them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the >fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting >houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not >exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your >graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they >will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never >be otherwise."
>How right he was. And basically the same that I myself always say. >Only that he formulates better - and is more known. >.)
>Read the article. The parallels between jews and mohammedans are >terryfying. 'As one writer tersely put it, the Jews represent a wedge >of Asia driven into the heart of Europe.'
A friend of mine suggested to me that Freemasonry was like Talmudism for Gentiles, which obviously is incorrect, since the traditions of Freemasonry go back to a time well before there were any Jews in Europe at all. That said, it may be fair to suggest that in fact the Jews get blamed for a lot of what goes on that Gentiles are in fact behind. Bush and his cronies are mostly Gentiles, it should be noted.
> The "Franklin Prophecy" was published in the February 3, 1934 edition > of the weekly newspaper <I>Liberation</I>, published by American Nazi > leader William Dudley Pelley. Pelley, a former newspaper reporter, is > suspected of being the author of the forgery...
> The eminent American historian Charles Beard investigated the > "Franklin Prophecy." He could find no copy of Pickney's diary or even > any reference to it in the Library of Congress, the National Archives, > the Franklin Institute, or other historical libraries. Nor was there > any reference to Franklin having made such a speech. > 16 November 2007
> The "Franklin Prophecy" > 70-year-old forgery continues to circulate
> The so-called "Franklin Prophecy," which continues to appear in > various countries, is an anti-Jewish forgery that first appeared in > the United States in 1934. Shortly thereafter, it was revealed to be a > phony document.
> The "Franklin Prophecy" claims that during the 1787 Constitutional > Convention, American founding father Benjamin Franklin made a speech > in which he warned against Jewish influence in America and proposed > that Jews be expelled from the United States. The speech allegedly was > found in the diary of a convention delegate, Charles Coatesworth > Pickney of South Carolina.
> The eminent American historian Charles Beard investigated the > "Franklin Prophecy." He could find no copy of Pickney's diary or even > any reference to it in the Library of Congress, the National Archives, > the Franklin Institute, or other historical libraries. Nor was there > any reference to Franklin having made such a speech. In 1935, Beard > wrote:
> <BLOCKQUOTE>I cannot find a single original source that gives the > slightest justification for believing that the Prophecy is anything > more than a barefaced forgery. Not a word have I discovered in > Franklin's letters and papers expressing any such sentiments against > the Jews as are ascribed to him .. His well-known liberality in > matters of religious opinion would, in fact, have precluded the kind > of utterances put in his mouth by this palpable forgery . . . In his > writings on immigration, Franklin made no mention of discrimination > against Jews. </BLOCKQUOTE>
> Part of the "Franklin Prophecy" claimed that Franklin had said:
> <BLOCKQUOTE>For more than 1700 years, [the Jews] have lamented their > sorrowful fate - namely, that they have been driven out of their > homeland; but, gentlemen, if the civilized world today should give > them back Palestine and their property, they would immediately find > pressing reason for not returning there. </BLOCKQUOTE>
> Beard noted, with regard to this sentence and the "Prophecy" in > general:
> <BLOCKQUOTE>the phraseology of the alleged Prophecy is not that of the > 18th century; nor is the language that of Franklin. It contains > certain words that belong to contemporary [Nazi] Germany rather than > America of Franklin's period. For example, the word "homeland" was not > employed by Jews in Franklin's time. It was created in connection with > the Palestine mandate. </BLOCKQUOTE>
> In other words, the passage referring to a "homeland" for the Jews in > Palestine could only have been written after this idea was first > suggested in the mid-1800s - well after the 1787 Constitutional > Convention.
> Beard also noted that Franklin held Jews in high regard, citing the > fact that Franklin contributed five pounds to the Hebrew Society of > Philadelphia when it was raising money for a synagogue and signing an > appeal for contributions to the synagogue from "citizens of every > religious denomination."
> Other historians and experts agree the "Prophecy" was a forgery. J. > Henry Smythe, Jr., author of <I>The Amazing Benjamin Franklin</I>, > said it was "a counterfeit," stating, "I have investigated this > calumny and find no historical basis." The librarian of the Historical > Society of Pennsylvania, Julian P. Boyd, came to the same conclusion. > Another Franklin biographer, Carl Van Doren,...
> sama bin Laden referred to Pelley's "Franklin Prophecy" forgery in his > 2002 "Letter to the American People," in which he complained about > supposed Jewish power in America, stating that this is "precisely what > Benjamin Franklin warned you against."
> Distributed by the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. > Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov
The so-called Franklin Prophecy was repudiated and debunked by the Franklin Society as a fraud shortly after it first appeard in the 1930's. He didn't say it folks.
-- Saint Séimí mac Liam Carriagemaker to the court of Queen Maeve Prophet of The Great Tagger Canonized December '99
THE EVIDENT PROBLEM IS WITH THE FRAUDULENT CHRISTIAN SECT AND ITS INFAMOUS JESUS ALLEGED CHRIST ( OR MESSIAH )
THE JEWS SAW ALL OF THIS AS A FRAUD LONG AGO AND RIGHTLY IT'S HIGH TIME TO GIVE THEM THAT CREDIT THAT THEY DID ALL TO OPEN THE GOYS ( VILE SEED OF CATTLE) 'S EYES TO THE MASQUERADE OF THE BRISTIANS BLEATING CRAWLING BELLOWING CARRION FEEDING & SEWAGE DRINKING SECTS !
The Roman themselves before the Constantine opportunist called it the SECT OF FILTH, since unable to clean themselves and unable to see the difference between the pure & used water. The Roman rightly murdered that BRISTIANS FILTH BY THOUSAND AS THE CAUSE OF PLAGUES & FAMINES INDEED ...
JUST BLAME YOURSELF FOR THE SITUATION OF SLAVERY IN WHICH YOU HAVE PUT YOURSELF AS INDEED TRAITORS TO OUR ALMIGHTY CELTIC AND THE GOD OF OUR FATHERS INDEED !
LET'S PRAY NOW !
Great God, The Unique, The Unnamed, The Blessed One and Creator of all ! Teach us to love our friends as best as we can with honour, and hate our enemies and pursue them with our revenge until they pay or ask for mercy ! Please curse them just as we do, and support our just anger !
Give us strength to uphold at all time the Blessed Sword of Justice, and never falter in the Respect of our Duty & Obedience to the Sacred Cosmic Laws !!!!
Séimí mac Liam wrote: > The so-called Franklin Prophecy was repudiated and debunked by the > Franklin Society as a fraud shortly after it first appeard in the > 1930's. He didn't say it folks.
But it will continue to be repeated, just like The Protocols. Sometimes total debunking strengthens the True Believers.
There are plenty of anti-semitic statements from eminent figures from history. Doesn't mean that they were right - it means that they held certain opinions common in their time.
> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have > lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have > segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and > tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is > founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within > a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to > death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not > exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than > 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will > dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives > and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude > them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the > fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting > houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not > exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your > graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they > will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never > be otherwise."
f. Argumentum ad verecundiam An argument in which an authority is appealed to. Ad verecundiam refers to a fallacy of simply resorting to appeals to authority. Again, very common in advertizing. Examples: 1. Drink this soda because this famous athlete drinks it. 2. Vote this way because this famous actor will vote this way. 3. Believe this because this famous pastor (teacher) believes this.
> On Dec 3, 6:20 am, Michael Laudahn eOpposition <ch805...@yahoo.com.br> > wrote: >> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have >> lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have >> segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and >> tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is >> founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within >> a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to >> death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not >> exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than >> 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will >> dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives >> and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude >> them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the >> fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting >> houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not >> exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your >> graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they >> will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never >> be otherwise."
> f. Argumentum ad verecundiam > An argument in which an authority is appealed to. Ad verecundiam > refers to a fallacy of simply resorting to appeals to authority. > Again, very common in advertizing. > Examples: > 1. Drink this soda because this famous athlete drinks it. > 2. Vote this way because this famous actor will vote this way. > 3. Believe this because this famous pastor (teacher) believes this.
> and I would add example number 4
> 4. Be anti-Jewish, because Benjamin Franklin was.
> VV
But he wasn't. He didn't make the statements alleged. It's a lie from beginning to end.
-- Saint Séimí mac Liam Carriagemaker to the court of Queen Maeve Prophet of The Great Tagger Canonized December '99
<nats_ugly...@yahoo.com> wrote: >On Dec 3, 6:20 am, Michael Laudahn eOpposition <ch805...@yahoo.com.br> >wrote: >> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have >> lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have >> segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and >> tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is >> founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within >> a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to >> death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not >> exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than >> 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will >> dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives >> and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude >> them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the >> fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting >> houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not >> exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your >> graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they >> will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never >> be otherwise."
>f. Argumentum ad verecundiam >An argument in which an authority is appealed to. Ad verecundiam >refers to a fallacy of simply resorting to appeals to authority. >Again, very common in advertizing. >Examples: >1. Drink this soda because this famous athlete drinks it. >2. Vote this way because this famous actor will vote this way. >3. Believe this because this famous pastor (teacher) believes this.
>and I would add example number 4
>4. Be anti-Jewish, because Benjamin Franklin was.
The thing is, Franklin never made the statements in question. The entire claim is a fraud.
> Viejo Vizcacha <nats_ugly...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:3e9f2ca0-8c3f-46ff- > 8977-c30a810cf...@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com:
> > On Dec 3, 6:20 am, Michael Laudahn eOpposition <ch805...@yahoo.com.br> > > wrote: > >> "In whatever country Jews have settled in any great numbers, they have > >> lowered its moral tone, depreciated its commercial integrity; have > >> segregated themselves and not been assimilated; have sneered at and > >> tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is > >> founded by objecting to its restrictions: have built up a state within > >> a state, and when opposed, have tried to strangle that country to > >> death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. If you do not > >> exclude them from the United States in this Constitution, in less than > >> 200 years they will have swarmed in such great numbers that they will > >> dominate, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives > >> and our substances, and jeopardized our liberty. If you do not exclude > >> them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the > >> fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting > >> houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not > >> exclude the Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your > >> graves. Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they > >> will, or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never > >> be otherwise."
> > f. Argumentum ad verecundiam > > An argument in which an authority is appealed to. Ad verecundiam > > refers to a fallacy of simply resorting to appeals to authority. > > Again, very common in advertizing. > > Examples: > > 1. Drink this soda because this famous athlete drinks it. > > 2. Vote this way because this famous actor will vote this way. > > 3. Believe this because this famous pastor (teacher) believes this.
> > and I would add example number 4
> > 4. Be anti-Jewish, because Benjamin Franklin was.
> > VV
> But he wasn't. He didn't make the statements alleged. It's a lie from > beginning to end.
Lying would not be beneath the Nazis. It does not surprise me.
"The Franklin Prophecy", sometimes called "The Franklin Forgery", is an antisemitic speech falsely attributed to Benjamin Franklin, warning of the supposed dangers of admitting Jews to the nascent United States. The speech was purportedly transcribed by Charles Cotesworth Pinckney during the Constitutional Convention of 1787, but was unknown before its appearance in 1934 in the pages of William Dudley Pelley's pro-Nazi weekly magazine Liberation. With linguistic anachronisms, it cannot be genuine. Despite having been repeatedly discredited since its first appearance, the “prophecy” has proved a remarkably durable canard, returning most recently as a popular internet hoax promulgated on usenet groups and antisemitic websites, where it is presented as authentic. On February 18, 1998, a member of the Fatah Central Committee revived this myth and mistakenly referred to Franklin as a former President of the United States.[1] Osama Bin Laden has even used this canard briefly in his November 2002 "Letter to the American People."[2] While its author is not known, many who have investigated the “prophecy” suspect Pelley of having penned it himself.
The US Congress report Anti-Semitism in Europe: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on European Affairs of the Committee on Foreign Relations (2004) states:
"The Franklin "Prophecy" is a classic anti-Semitic canard that falsely claims that American statesman Benjamin Franklin made anti-Jewish statements during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It has found widening acceptance in Muslim and Arab media, where it has been used to criticize Israel and Jews..."[3]
Franklin was, in fact, a friend to the Jews of 18th-century America, [4] and contributed toward the building of Philadelphia's first permanent synagogue.[5]
There have been similar false antisemitic quotations attributed to George Washington which have been debunked. In fact, in 1790 Washington sent a letter to the Jewish community in Rhode Island, writing that he envisioned a country "which gives bigotry no sanction ... persecution no assistance". For the first time in modern history, Jews lived in a country where they enjoyed full and equal human and political rights - as a birthright of citizenship.[6]
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 20:26:17 -0500, Scotius <yodas...@mnsi.net> wrote:
> A friend of mine suggested to me that Freemasonry was like >Talmudism for Gentiles, which obviously is incorrect, since the >traditions of Freemasonry go back to a time well before there were any >Jews in Europe at all.
