Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

...You Don't Have the Right...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

AnAmericanCitizen

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 6:02:23 PM10/28/09
to

I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC


On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:52:18 -0400, "Dionysus" <no.sur...@never.net> wrote:

>AN E-MAIL FROM A FRIEND
>
>This is probably the best e-mail I've seen in a long, long time. The
>following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA.
>[This guy should run for President one day.]
>
>"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone
>get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our
>nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of
>debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildren,
>hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense
>guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other
>liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole
>lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require
>a Bill of NON-Rights."
>
>ARTICLE I: You do not have the right to a new car, big screen TV, or any
>other form of wealth. More power to you if you can legally acquire them, but
>no one is guaranteeing anything.
>
>ARTICLE II: You do not have the right to never be offended. This country is
>based on freedom, and that means freedom for everyone--not just you! You may
>leave the room, turn the channel, express a different opinion, etc; but the
>world is full of idiots, and probably always will be.
>
>ARTICLE III: You do not have the right to be free from harm. If you stick a
>screwdriver in your eye, learn to be more careful; do not expect the tool
>manufacturer to make you and all your relatives independently wealthy.
>
>ARTICLE IV: You do not have the right to free food and housing. Americans
>are the most charitable people to be found, and will gladly help anyone in
>need, but we are quickly growing weary of subsidizing generation after
>generation of professional couch potatoes who achieve nothing more than the
>creation of another generation of professional couch potatoes.
>
>ARTICLE V: You do not have the right to free health care. That would be
>nice, but from the looks of public housing, we're just not interested in
>public health care.
>
>ARTICLE VI: You do not have the right to physically harm other people. If
>you kidnap, rape, intentionally maim, or kill someone, don't be surprised if
>the rest of us want to see you fry in the electric chair.
>
>ARTICLE VII: You do not have the right to the possessions of others. If you
>rob, cheat, or coerce away the goods or services of other citizens, don't be
>surprised if the rest of us get together and lock you away in a place where
>you still won't have the right to a big screen color TV or a life of
>leisure.
>
>ARTICLE VIII: You do not have the right to a job. All of us sure want you
>to have a job, and will gladly help you along in hard times, but we expect
>you to take advantage of the opportunities of education and vocational
>training laid before you to make yourself useful.
>
>ARTICLE IX: You do not have the right to happiness. Being an American
>means that you have the right to PURSUE happiness, which by the way, is a
>lot easier if you are unencumbered by an over abundance of idiotic laws
>created by those of you who were confused by the Bill of Rights.
>
>ARTICLE X: This is an English speaking country. We don't care where you are
>from, English is our language. Learn it or go back to wherever you came
>from!
>
>(Last...)
>
>ARTICLE XI: You do not have the right to change our country's history or
>heritage. This country was founded on the belief in one true God. And yet,
>you are given the freedom to believe in any religion, any faith, or no faith
>at all; with no fear of persecution. The phrase IN GOD WE TRUST is part of
>our heritage and history, and if you are uncomfortable with it, TOUGH!
>***********
>
>Add to it: "The American dream is not an entitlement." --Author Unknown
>
>Dionysus
>

AndrewJH

unread,
Oct 28, 2009, 6:52:12 PM10/28/09
to
> >Dionysus- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha. Now reread what you posted.

f. barnes

unread,
Oct 29, 2009, 1:35:54 AM10/29/09
to
> All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.  Now reread what you posted.- Hide quoted text -

What is, is.

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 1, 2009, 3:43:07 PM11/1/09
to
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
<ahill...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 28, 5:02�pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
>All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.

I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.

>Now reread what you posted.

Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
reread it...

AndrewJH

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 11:21:40 PM11/6/09
to
On Nov 1, 2:43 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
>
> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Oct 28, 5:02 pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
> >All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.
>
> I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.
>
> >Now reread what you posted.
>
> Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
> reread it...

Buddha was not fat. You are refering to slanderous westernized
cartoon characters. You are rather stupid.

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:33:53 AM11/7/09
to
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:21:40 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
<ahill...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 1, 2:43�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
>> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 28, 5:02�pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
>> >All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.
>> I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.
>> >Now reread what you posted.
>> Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
>> reread it...
>Buddha was not fat.

Yes, he was a huge, morbidly obese, fat bastard.

He was also the laziest fuck of all time (not counting Michael Moore).
He never had a real job in his life.

Here are some pics of the huge fat bastard in a diaper:

http://scratchtoscratch.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/buddha.jpg

http://www.guidetoworlddomination.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/buddha.jpg

>You are rather stupid.

Enjoy eating your rice from Buddha's asscrack, dumbass.

Tater Gumfries

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 12:05:47 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 9:33 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:21:40 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
>
> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 1, 2:43 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
> >> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 28, 5:02 pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> >> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
> >> >All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.
> >> I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.
> >> >Now reread what you posted.
> >> Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
> >> reread it...
> >Buddha was not fat.
>
> Yes, he was a huge, morbidly obese, fat bastard.

Wrong again. He was an skinny injun feller, not a fat Chinee. You just
too uneducated to know the difference.

Saaayyy... what's your wife up to now? 230? 240?

Tater

AndrewJH

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 1:33:56 PM11/7/09
to
On Nov 7, 10:33 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:21:40 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
>
> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 1, 2:43 pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
> >> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >On Oct 28, 5:02 pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> >> >> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
> >> >All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.
> >> I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.
> >> >Now reread what you posted.
> >> Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
> >> reread it...
> >Buddha was not fat.
>
> Yes, he was a huge, morbidly obese, fat bastard.
>
> He was also the laziest fuck of all time (not counting Michael Moore).
> He never had a real job in his life.
>
> Here are some pics of the huge fat bastard in a diaper:
>
> http://scratchtoscratch.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/buddha.jpg
>
> http://www.guidetoworlddomination.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/budd...

>
> >You are rather stupid.
>
> Enjoy eating your rice from Buddha's asscrack, dumbass.

Unfortunately, you appear to have acquired your wealth of "knowledge"
from entertaiment media sources. "Patriot Games" is the name of an
insipid movie. Your characterization of Buddha is cartoonish. Your
(dis)information comes from Fox News, the propaganda arm of the
Republican Party. Fox News executives are successful entertainers,
that I submit. Their audience however is STUPID!!!. Please cite
from now on your historical sources ("Buddha was fat"). You, sir, are
stupid.

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 2:36:32 PM11/7/09
to
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:33:56 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
<ahill...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Nov 7, 10:33�am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 20:21:40 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
>> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >On Nov 1, 2:43�pm, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT), AndrewJH
>> >> <ahillik...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Oct 28, 5:02�pm, AnAmericanCitizen <NoAmne...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> >> I'm reposting this excellent e-mail to make it available for more readers.....AAC
>> >> >All "reality" is an illusion. - Buddha.
>> >> I don't take advice from a 450-lb. fat bastard in a diaper.
>> >> >Now reread what you posted.
>> >> Since you seem to want to eat your rice from Buddha's asscrack YOU go
>> >> reread it...
>> >Buddha was not fat.
>> Yes, he was a huge, morbidly obese, fat bastard.
>> He was also the laziest fuck of all time (not counting Michael Moore).
>> He never had a real job in his life.
>> Here are some pics of the huge fat bastard in a diaper:
>> http://scratchtoscratch.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/buddha.jpg
>> http://www.guidetoworlddomination.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/budd...
>> >You are rather stupid.
>> Enjoy eating your rice from Buddha's asscrack, dumbass.
>Your characterization of Buddha is cartoonish.

The facts are what they are.

They were also a family of pedophiles, the fat bastard married his own
cousin.

But he only ever had one child, maybe he was too busy feeding his fat
bastard face to fuck his ugly cousin or maybe he was a fag?

>Please cite from now on your historical sources ("Buddha was fat").

http://fatbuddhastore.blogspot.com/

>You, sir, are stupid.

AndrewJH

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 6:47:32 PM11/7/09
to
> Enjoy eating your rice from Buddha's asscrack, dumbass.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Enjoy being stupid"?

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:26:19 AM11/8/09
to
>Enjoy being stupid"?

I enjoyed pissing in your rice bowl.

hahahahahahahahahahah!!!

AndrewJH

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:38:18 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 8, 9:26 am, Patriot Games <Patr...@America.Com> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:47:32 -0800 (PST), AndrewJH
>
>
>
>
>
> hahahahahahahahahahah!!!- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

I don't know if Buddha by todays standard would have been a
pedophile. He was not a mass murdering terrorist. Who may I be
speaking of?
Jesus? Joseph? Mary? Ezekial? A simple intellegence test.

Tater Gumfries

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 12:38:14 PM11/8/09
to

Yeah, he does.

Tater

Patriot Games

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 2:30:33 PM11/8/09
to
>I don't know if Buddha by todays standard would have been a
>pedophile. He was not a mass murdering terrorist. Who may I be
>speaking of?
>Jesus? Joseph? Mary? Ezekial? A simple intellegence test.

Nobody knows...

You probably OD'd on rice... Having hallucinations...

AndrewJH

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 4:29:23 PM11/8/09
to
> You probably OD'd on rice...  Having hallucinations...- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Moses and Joshua, you dumbshit. You're another spiritual fraud known
as a "Christian". Funny how you stupid crackers never read the Bible.

0 new messages