Let's get rid of the problem
'Cos they just don't belong
Let's get rid of the problem
And send them all back home
It's said they only come here
To have a better life
But when they bring their problems
It means never-ending strife
And when they work for peanuts
So that you can't find a job
The fat cats lick their lips
And tell you you're a lazy slob
So let's get rid of the problem
'Cos they just don't belong
Let's get rid of the problem
And send them all back home
Some people value freedom
Some say that all is well
But some use ammonium nitrate
And say freedom go to hell
They talk about religion of peace
How quickly they forget
Under the shadow of a minaret
There'll be a lifetime of regret
So let's get rid of the problem
'Cos they just don't belong
Let's get rid of the problem
And send them all back home
We fought in two world wars
They told us it was just
You might well ask what we did it for
Now they're colonising us
They tell us we're the problem
And that our views don't belong
They tell us we're the problem
But they're all anti-English scum
Reminds me of a song I used to cover back in the day..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MkRuV0aCcI
Chorus:
Whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge whinge whinge
whinge whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge
Whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge
Whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge, whinge.
crap on brother......
Is the song about Politicians?
It's clearly about the Poles...
>On Dec 24, 11:15�am, White Spirit <wspi...@homechoice.co.uk> wrote:
>> All day long you see them
>> Everywhere in our streets
>> We go out and work hard
>> While they just drag their feet
...
>>
>> They tell us we're the problem
>> And that our views don't belong
>> They tell us we're the problem
>> But they're all anti-English scum
>
>Is the song about Politicians?
The Irish, I believe. Or was that last week...
> Reminds me of a song I used to cover back in the day..
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MkRuV0aCcI
It looks like genocidal anti-English bigot number one has revealed himself.
I would ask for evidence of National Socialism or anti-Semitic thought
in my lyrics but you obviously don't know what a Nazi is and are too
busy attempting to rationalise truths that you find uncomfortable to
apply any honest thought to the matter.
> Chorus:
And here comes anti-English genocidal bigot number two, presumably
echoing what he thinks his Scotch friends would want to hear.
> crap on brother......
Anti-English genocidal bigot number three is a renowned troll and is
generally perceived to have a mental age of about twelve.
> Is the song about Politicians?
It is in part. It's largely about English culture and demographics
making way for foreign people backed by business owners and politicians
who cynically manipulate the public for their own ends.
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 14:03:40 -0800 (PST), Sac Dave
>> Is the song about Politicians?
> The Irish, I believe. Or was that last week...
Anti-English genocidal bigot number four likes to pretend that problems
don't exist and when he is shown something negative outside the
boundaries of his fantasy world, he shoots the messenger due to his
leftist ideology being incompatible with the truth.
Well I guess the only difference I can see, the Nazis were willing to
kill, whereas your good self merely wants to send "them"
home......wherever that might be. I was stunned by the intellectual
depth of your "lyrics".
Your "lyrics" are about English culture? God help England then.
its spelt 'Anti-Arsehole'........arsehole
> Well I guess the only difference I can see, the Nazis were willing to
> kill, whereas your good self merely wants to send "them"
> home......wherever that might be. I was stunned by the intellectual
> depth of your "lyrics".
Anti-English genocidal bigot number five comes to the fore. 'They' have
their own countries to inhabit and influence to suit their needs. We
have ours and it should remain ours.
> You really do sound like Steve Wallis' alter ego!
Thus speaks anti-English genocidal bigot number six, who has nothing of
substance to proffer.
> Your "lyrics" are about English culture? God help England then.
'God' has nothing to do with this.
> its spelt 'Anti-Arsehole'........arsehole
"It's" requires an apostrophe and the correct participle is 'spelled',
you illiterate advertisement for post-natal abortion. ('Spelt' is the
preterite).
I was wondering when anti-English genocical bigot number seven would put
down his crack pipe and give us words of wisdom.
How's your wife's sun tan?
They're not really his 'Scotch friends', though. Those like him, and those
on whose behalf he operates around here, have no more regard for the Scots
than they do for the English. They just need some particularly willing and
useful idiots to use in their divide-and-rule scheme, and the Jocks fit the
bill perfectly.
sorry i ment racist cunt.....
> sorry i ment racist cunt.....
Even if that were the case, you are just a plain cunt.
> "White Spirit" <wsp...@homechoice.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:hh24lu$fbe$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> And here comes anti-English genocidal bigot number two, presumably echoing
>> what he thinks his Scotch friends would want to hear.
> They're not really his 'Scotch friends', though. Those like him, and those
> on whose behalf he operates around here, have no more regard for the Scots
> than they do for the English. They just need some particularly willing and
> useful idiots to use in their divide-and-rule scheme, and the Jocks fit the
> bill perfectly.
Indeed. Their duplicity does not go unnoticed but I anticipate that it
will not be rewarded with the establishment of the New World Order.
There is only room for so many snouts at the trough and the remainder
will be forced to do their bidding.
as opposed to the BNP who are just plane cunts
are u out of dumb racist jokes?
That is probably the only thing we will ever agree upon.
Anti-English? Interesting when you consider that is where I am from,
both parents both born there, all four grandparents born there, six of
my great-grandparents born there, the other two are Scottish and
Irish.
I am intrigued by your use of the word genocidal. Just how do you
consider me genocidal?
>Anti-English? Interesting when you consider that is where I am from,
>both parents both born there, all four grandparents born there, six of
>my great-grandparents born there, the other two are Scottish and
>Irish.
_______________________________________________________
But you weren't born here, and you call yourself Scottish - when it suits!
Even if you were English, it doesn't mean that you couldn't be
'anti-English'. Some of the most dedicated English-haters around here
*claim* to be English.
>I am intrigued by your use of the word genocidal. Just how do you
>consider me genocidal?
The English are being systematically dispossessed and eradicated, only the
terminally stupid and the evil cunning try to deny it - or try to put down
those who recognise it. Your contribution to this thread certainly puts you
in one of those two groups.
So you have to be born in England to be English?
Explain how I might be anti-English.
Your contribution to this thread indicates that you are no better that
the loon who started it.
What an English person is, or what it means to be English has
constantly changed over the past 1500 years, and it will continue to
do so over the next 1500 years. Dispossession is what happened to the
Australian aboriginals when the British "settled" here more than 200
years ago. That is not happening to the "English".
No-one said that. How on earth can you deduce that from what was said?
>Explain how I might be anti-English.
I already have.
>Your contribution to this thread indicates that you are no better that
>the loon who started it.
In your opinion, for which I care little.
>What an English person is, or what it means to be English has
>constantly changed over the past 1500 years, and it will continue to
>do so over the next 1500 years.Dispossession is what happened to the
>Australian aboriginals when the British "settled" here more than 200
>years ago.
As one of the 'dispossessers' yourself' it hardly puts you in a position to
get on your hind legs about it.
>That is not happening to the "English".
It most certainly is. The Australian aboriginals probably numbered fewer
that 200,000 when the British colonised the country - disparate and tribal
at that.. This number in a country of around 3 million square miles means
that it was virtually unpopulated - ie one person to every 15 square miles.
Even today there are only about 7 people to the square mile, plenty of room
for the aborignes I would have thought.
England, on the other hand, has a population density of over 1000 to the
square mile - and growing by the day. Many of her cities have a near
majority of ethnic minorities, with their birth-rates far outstripping those
of the indigenous population. London, for example, is no longer an English
city in many ways - with some areas having few or no white residents, they
have been, effectively, ethnically cleansed. If this isn't 'dispossession',
then I don't know what is!
So why mention the fact that I may not or may have been in England?
I arrived in Australia during 1993, the process of "dispossession" was
well and truly in place by then.
Didn't you know the notion of terra nullius was discredited a long
time ago?
Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise. The fact that
there is such a cultural/ethnic mix in London makes it, in my opinion
of course the most English of cities. You are out of touch Mr Giles.
> Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
> almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise.
Why is it that you prefer to not be around your own people?
> The fact that
> there is such a cultural/ethnic mix in London makes it, in my opinion
> of course the most English of cities.
That's one of the most amusing cases of topsy turvy logic that I've seen
on this group in a long time.
> You are out of touch Mr Giles.
You are the one who is out of touch. You're out of touch with your own
culture, if you are as English as you profess to be. The lifeblood of
the English nation has always been the English people themselves, not
the immigrants whom the Left attempt to portray in a positively light in
revision of the historical facts.
> Oh dear! We are precious, aren't we?
Are we? Perhaps I'd better beware the magpie - or the gippo in your case.
> You post a bunch of turgid 'lyrics'
> to a clutch of unrelated newsgroups and, when you are mocked for it, play
> the race card - not once but at least 6 times.
Clearly the irony is lost on you, but that doesn't suprise me.
> Would you care to give us
> your rationale for posting it to, say, alt.guitar.amps?
Spend some time there and see for yourself.
>Jellore wrote:
>
>> Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
>> almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise.
>
>Why is it that you prefer to not be around your own people?
Perhaps it's because he doesn't share your xenophobia.
>All day long you see them
>Everywhere in our streets
>We go out and work hard
>While they just drag their feet
>
>Let's get rid of the problem
>'Cos they just don't belong
>Let's get rid of the problem
>And send them all back home
This is a local country for local people.
I can just imagine Turps as Tubbs.
> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 13:16:57 +0000, White Spirit
>> Why is it that you prefer to not be around your own people?
> Perhaps it's because he doesn't share your xenophobia.
It's interesting that not wishing for my country to be colonised equates
with xenophobia in your mind. This is the topsy turvy logic by which
useful idiots like you attempt to portray opposition to mass immigration
in a negative light.
Auld Bob
Auld Bob
He had Rationale?
Wow!
Auld Bob
> Here we have the typical English idiot. These people are so insecure and so
> unsure of themselves that they have to dream up a silly name for every race
> they feel threatened by.
And you accuse us of being bigoted. Not that'll you read this anyway
given that you were forced to killfile me after sustaining emotional
injuries following a severe beating after you tried to play airmchair
philogist and historian with someone who knows what he is talking about.
> There are a great many of these names in use. The
> more names they use for other countries people the more the English regard
> them as a threat to the English.
> So let us see just how many nations the English feel inferior too -
> Jocks, Scotch, Paddies, Micks, Bog Hoppers, Taffies, Wogs, Wops, Frogs,
> Krauts, Bosch, Gerry, Greasers, yanks, roos, Wallabies, Kiwis, Ragheads,
> niggers, Canucks.
You missed out 'arselifters', 'lip-smacking jungle-bunnies',
'spear-chuckers' and 'goat-fuckers'.
> They are rather a lazy, feckless lot down there and there are lots of them
> out of work in their capital city. In fact there are more out of work there
> than in the rest of the UK put together.
We're so lazy that we just happen to be subsiding your country while
your Scotch mates are over-represented in Parliament.
> Now that is the best joke I've heard this year.
> A claimed descendant of a race who came to Southern Britain after the Romans
> left and stayed on. Now they feel all bitter and twisted that another lot of
> incomers are pushing them out again.
I'm certainly not prepared to be held to account for something my
ancestors supposedly did.
Wrong.
> The Australian aboriginals probably numbered fewer that 200,000 when the
> British colonised the country - disparate and tribal at that.. This number
> in a country of around 3 million square miles means that it was virtually
> unpopulated - ie one person to every 15 square miles. Even today there are
> only about 7 people to the square mile, plenty of room for the aborignes I
> would have thought.
>
> England, on the other hand, has a population density of over 1000 to the
> square mile - and growing by the day.
Chuckle! However, how many of them are English by birth and how many of them
are from elsewhere?
You are not quoting how many are English when you quote population density.
> Many of her cities have a near majority of ethnic minorities,
Err! If they are an ethnic minority that means there are still more English
than other people. In any case most of them will be English born but of a
different colour.
> with their birth-rates far outstripping those of the indigenous
> population.
If these are English born then they are part of the indigenous population.
In any case the English, being descended from the Angles are not the
indigenous population.
> London, for example, is no longer an English city in many ways - with some
> areas having few or no white residents, they have been, effectively,
> ethnically cleansed. If this isn't 'dispossession', then I don't know what
> is!
Who said they had to be white to be incomers?
I know French, German, Italian, Spanish, Australians, New Zealanders,
Canadians, USAsians, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Greeks who are all Londoners?Some
of the above were even London born.Sounds like you are just anti-black
skinned people.
--
Auld Bob
>
>
If there was ever any 'dispossession' of the Australian aborignes, it has
been carried out by the past and present white populations of Australia -
which you firmly belong to - so you are in no position to get on your hind
legs about anything. I have never been to Australia - nor do I intend to go
there.
>Didn't you know the notion of terra nullius was discredited a long
>time ago?
>Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
>almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise.
Interesting, and of course also very revealing, choice of words there. You
can always rely on the hidden-agenda - phoney 'one-world, anti-racist' -
brigade, to use that sort of language. Thus, any defence of our traditional
way of life, or objection to having our towns and cities changed beyond
recognition, is to 'despise' or - the favourite - 'hate' something or other.
The fact is very few - and certainly not myself - hate or despise any
individual immigrants for coming here (other than the ones who wish us
harm). They do, though, certainly hate and the despise the politicians who
deliberately - and often maliciously - allowed them to come in such vast
numbers.
The fact that
>there is such a cultural/ethnic mix in London makes it, in my opinion
>of course the most English of cities. You are out of touch Mr Giles.
If you really think that London is now 'the most English of cities', you're
not just out of touch, Mr 'Jellore'', but out of your tiny mind.
"Scotland believes not in entrepreneurialism, like in London and the
southeast. The reality is that the Scots enjoy spending it, they don't enjoy
creating it, which is the opposite of down in the south"
Jackie Stewart - Sunday Times 28/10/2007
What are you rabbiting on about now, Thickers? When I quote population
density I am quoting just - er - population density! What does the racial
mix, composition - call it what you will - have to do with my reference to
population density?
>> Many of her cities have a near majority of ethnic minorities,
> Err! If they are an ethnic minority that means there are still more
> English than other people. In any case most of them will be English born
> but of a different colour.
They are ethnic minorities in England as a whole, Thickers, is that so
difficult for you to understand? The term is widely used and understood -
has it not got up to the hills yet? Sometimes in your over-eagerness to
froth out your rabid anti-English bile you really do surpass yourself. And
please spare us your usual 'nearest and dearest' routine, that you generally
wheel out at this juncture, no-one's impressed.
>>> with their birth-rates far outstripping those of the indigenous
>> population.
> If these are English born then they are part of the indigenous
population.
> In any case the English, being descended from the Angles are not the
> indigenous population.
A thousand years or so is good enough for most of us.
>
>> London, for example, is no longer an English city in many ways - with
>> some areas having few or no white residents, they have been, effectively,
>> ethnically cleansed. If this isn't 'dispossession', then I don't know
>> what is!
>
> Who said they had to be white to be incomers?
> I know French, German, Italian, Spanish, Australians, New Zealanders,
> Canadians, USAsians, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Greeks who are all
> Londoners?Some of the above were even London born.Sounds like you are just
> anti-black skinned people.
Oh dear, Thickers, as one of the leading 'antis' on usenet you really are
priceless. Now, go and have a lie down - and put more water with it in
future!
Trouble is, idiot, I'm neither anti-English nor am I anti-coloured people.
I am most certainly anti-racist and anti-bigot and as you are both I am
anti-you. However, as I have often posted on these groups, you are most
certainly not representative of the average English person.
I'm quite fond of the English people and I even married one once.
She was a nice lady but she died some years ago.
As to my claim, that I'm fond of the English people and that you dispute,
When did the English people on these groups appoint you as their
spokesperson?
I'd warrant the average English person would want to disassociate themselves
from a racist bigot like yourself as soon as they can.
My experiance is that the vast majority of English folks would distance
themself from you as they are mostly a very decent nation.
>
>
>>>> with their birth-rates far outstripping those of the indigenous
>>> population.
>
> > If these are English born then they are part of the indigenous
> population.
>> In any case the English, being descended from the Angles are not the
>> indigenous population.
>
> A thousand years or so is good enough for most of us.
Once again are you the official spokesperson or just assuming that they are
all just like you?
>
>
>
>>
>>> London, for example, is no longer an English city in many ways - with
>>> some areas having few or no white residents, they have been,
>>> effectively, ethnically cleansed. If this isn't 'dispossession', then I
>>> don't know what is!
>>
>> Who said they had to be white to be incomers?
>> I know French, German, Italian, Spanish, Australians, New Zealanders,
>> Canadians, USAsians, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Greeks who are all
>> Londoners?Some of the above were even London born.Sounds like you are
>> just anti-black skinned people.
>
> Oh dear, Thickers, as one of the leading 'antis' on usenet you really are
> priceless. Now, go and have a lie down - and put more water with it in
> future!
First of all you only state antis but do not say anti-what. Secondly I do
not drink alcohol so you are wrong again, as usual.
Thirdly the only things I'm anti are guns, bigots, bullies and racists.
If you are any, or all of these things then yes, I'm anti-you.
(but then you knew that already).
--
Auld Bob
A camera shows a stage littered with equipment...
Three young men walk on, all thin and dressed in black jeans, heavy
boots and plain buttoned shirts in primary colours, the singer walks to
the microphone, he has shock of hair dyed white and standing up in
spikes, he looks around and screams...
"This is for England"
The band starts, a series of punk style distorted power chords ring out
very quickly across a frenzied drum beat.
The camera pans back revealing an audience of four skinheads with facial
tattoos and single sinister looking man wearing a black suit, white
shirt and what looks like, but isn't, a regimental tie.
The suited man looks pleased as the four skinheads (they're all men)
start pogo-ing across the dance floor...
The singer starts...
> All day long you see them
> Everywhere in our streets
> We go out and work hard
> While they just drag their feet
Even the skinheads spot the obvious problem with the following verse...
> And when they work for peanuts
> So that you can't find a job
> The fat cats lick their lips
> And tell you you're a lazy slob
>
"Very good lads" says the suited man, "Very nice, we'll get you a deal
with BNP records and you'll sell a load, could go gold.
"A quarter of a million, we'll be rich..."
"No son..." The man looked a bit sad. "At BNP records going gold
means you sold more than 10..."
--
William Black
"Any number under six"
The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.
That'll make the Australians very happy this Christmas.
>
>
>>Didn't you know the notion of terra nullius was discredited a long
>>time ago?
>>Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
>>almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise.
>
> Interesting, and of course also very revealing, choice of words there. You
> can always rely on the hidden-agenda - phoney 'one-world, anti-racist' -
> brigade, to use that sort of language. Thus, any defence of our
> traditional way of life, or objection to having our towns and cities
> changed beyond recognition, is to 'despise' or - the favourite - 'hate'
> something or other. The fact is very few - and certainly not myself - hate
> or despise any individual immigrants for coming here (other than the ones
> who wish us harm). They do, though, certainly hate and the despise the
> politicians who deliberately - and often maliciously - allowed them to
> come in such vast numbers.
Get real - in real terms they are only 1 in 10 at a maximum and that
includes the white immigrants.
As usual you are just talking so much hot air.
>
> The fact that
>>there is such a cultural/ethnic mix in London makes it, in my opinion
>>of course the most English of cities. You are out of touch Mr Giles.
>
> If you really think that London is now 'the most English of cities',
> you're not just out of touch, Mr 'Jellore'', but out of your tiny mind.
The nutcase is you Farmer, racist, Giles.
--
Auld Bob
Auld Bob
>"Scotland believes not in entrepreneurialism, like in London and the
>southeast. The reality is that the Scots enjoy spending it, they don't enjoy
>creating it, which is the opposite of down in the south"
>
>Jackie Stewart - Sunday Times 28/10/2007
>
Is that Jackie Stewart the economist, or Jackie Stewart who used to
sit in a car and drive it round a track?
YOur country subsidises no one. It is in fiscal deficit.
My usual first sign of getting fed up with you is to start trimming the
headers then back you go to the killfile
As to You getting fed up that is laughable. Let me remind you that you are
the cross-poster into scot.politics and you have only one reason to be
there.
For some idiotic reason, best known to yourself, you seem to need to be
getting at some race or country or you just don't feel right with the World.
You claim I am anti- English yet I am nothing of the sort. I am, though,
very much anti-you and your kind. By your kind I most certainly do not mean
English people and I cannot say that my experience of many years working
among English people has shown them to be anything like you. Most English
people are not racist nor are they bigots. Why ever you think they are all
like you is an insult to them. When you presume to speak for them you harm
the whole English nation.
What is more I will never stop telling you what a numptie you are.
--
Auld Bob
> He'll read it alright. He's claimed to have 'plonked' me about half-a-dozen
> times. Problem is the silly old bugger tells that many lies he can't
> remember what he's said half the time. The list above he's used a dozen
> times before. Then he'll go on about the fine people of England, nearest and
> dearest and all that twaddle, and start almost every post with a rabid
> attack on the English - one way or another.
I've seen the 'nearest and dearest' a few times and it didn't ring true
then. The amusing thing about his little list is that many countries
use those expressions and the majority of them were not invented by us.
> It's the drink, you know. He's
> been doing it for years, gets sozzled and then goes into 'hate' mode.
That explains one or two things.
> When
> I've got a bit of time to spare I like to take the p*** out of the silly old
> sod, but he's too easy I get fed-up after a while.
Isn't he the one who believed that he was being spied upon by unknown
persons in a van parked on his street, for which 'meals on wheels' has
become something of a by-name?
It is now that we have bailed out the Royal Bank of Scotland. We help
to prop up Glasgow's economy by paying wages for dour Scotch people to
gouge English students while Scottish students study for free.
It was the driver one, you know the one that is dyslexic?
Mind you he is a businessman in a small way. If I remember right he has a
clay pigeon shooting school at the Gleneagles Hotel.
--
Auld Bob
[snip Billy Black's bizarre fantasy]
It looks like Wilhelm, the archetypal anti-English genocidal bigot, is
back from celebrating Diwali just in time to chime in with the verbal
equivalent of the Indian rope trick.
I like to do me bit!
>
>>
>>
>>>Didn't you know the notion of terra nullius was discredited a long
>>>time ago?
>>>Funny what I miss most about England, especially London where I spent
>>>almost a decade is the cultural mix you most despise.
>>
>> Interesting, and of course also very revealing, choice of words there.
>> You can always rely on the hidden-agenda - phoney 'one-world,
>> anti-racist' - brigade, to use that sort of language. Thus, any defence
>> of our traditional way of life, or objection to having our towns and
>> cities changed beyond recognition, is to 'despise' or - the favourite -
>> 'hate' something or other. The fact is very few - and certainly not
>> myself - hate or despise any individual immigrants for coming here (other
>> than the ones who wish us harm). They do, though, certainly hate and the
>> despise the politicians who deliberately - and often maliciously -
>> allowed them to come in such vast numbers.
>
> Get real - in real terms they are only 1 in 10 at a maximum and that
> includes the white immigrants.
> As usual you are just talking so much hot air.
1 in 10 where exactly, Thickers?
>>
>> The fact that
>>>there is such a cultural/ethnic mix in London makes it, in my opinion
>>>of course the most English of cities. You are out of touch Mr Giles.
>>
>> If you really think that London is now 'the most English of cities',
>> you're not just out of touch, Mr 'Jellore'', but out of your tiny mind.
> The nutcase is you Farmer, racist, Giles.
I won't respond to those sort of silly taunts, Thickers. I know it's
Christmas, and you've probably had even more than your usual quota - so I'll
make allowances. However, I will ask you a couple of questions and hope that
you will give me a straight and honest answer. Would you be happy to see the
city of Edinburgh with a minority white population? And, if the answer is
yes, do you think that the majority of your fellow Scots would agree with
you?
No answer, Thickers?
>>
>>
>>>> Many of her cities have a near majority of ethnic minorities,
>>
>>
>>> Err! If they are an ethnic minority that means there are still more
>>> English than other people. In any case most of them will be English born
>>> but of a different colour.
>>
>> They are ethnic minorities in England as a whole, Thickers, is that so
>> difficult for you to understand? The term is widely used and understood -
>> has it not got up to the hills yet? Sometimes in your over-eagerness to
>> froth out your rabid anti-English bile you really do surpass yourself.
>> And please spare us your usual 'nearest and dearest' routine, that you
>> generally wheel out at this juncture, no-one's impressed.
>
> Trouble is, idiot, I'm neither anti-English
Course not, Thickers, course not, and bears don't poo in the woods!
> nor am I anti-coloured people.
Tut, tut, Thickers, they don't like that term now, you know - they thinks
it's 'waycist'.
> I am most certainly anti-racist and anti-bigot and as you are both I am
> anti-you. However, as I have often posted on these groups, you are most
> certainly not representative of the average English person.
I think I know more about the 'average English person' than you, Thickers.
Although, if I wanted to make an equally crass comment, I could say that you
are certainly not representative of the average Scottish person.
> I'm quite fond of the English people and I even married one once.
> She was a nice lady but she died some years ago.
Not surprised, I should think living with you would see anyone off fairly
sharpish.
> As to my claim, that I'm fond of the English people and that you dispute,
> When did the English people on these groups appoint you as their
> spokesperson?
About the same time that the Scots appointed you as their's.
> I'd warrant the average English person would want to disassociate
> themselves from a racist bigot like yourself as soon as they can.
> My experiance is that the vast majority of English folks would distance
> themself from you as they are mostly a very decent nation.
Oh gawd, here he goes again. Phoney old bastard.
>>
>>
>>>>> with their birth-rates far outstripping those of the indigenous
>>>> population.
>>
>> > If these are English born then they are part of the indigenous
>> population.
>>> In any case the English, being descended from the Angles are not the
>>> indigenous population.
>>
>> A thousand years or so is good enough for most of us.
> Once again are you the official spokesperson or just assuming that they
> are all just like you?
Au contraire, Thickers, you're the one setting yourself up as the final
arbiter of what constitutes 'indigenous'.
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>> London, for example, is no longer an English city in many ways - with
>>>> some areas having few or no white residents, they have been,
>>>> effectively, ethnically cleansed. If this isn't 'dispossession', then I
>>>> don't know what is!
>>>
>>> Who said they had to be white to be incomers?
>>> I know French, German, Italian, Spanish, Australians, New Zealanders,
>>> Canadians, USAsians, Scots, Welsh, Irish, Greeks who are all
>>> Londoners?Some of the above were even London born.Sounds like you are
>>> just anti-black skinned people.
>>
>> Oh dear, Thickers, as one of the leading 'antis' on usenet you really are
>> priceless. Now, go and have a lie down - and put more water with it in
>> future!
> First of all you only state antis but do not say anti-what. Secondly I do
> not drink alcohol so you are wrong again, as usual.
Course you don't, Thickers, course you don't. And the Pope isn't a Catholic
either!
> Thirdly the only things I'm anti are guns, bigots, bullies and racists.
> If you are any, or all of these things then yes, I'm anti-you.
> (but then you knew that already).
You're 'anti' me, Thickers? I'm wounded, I really am - was it something I
said?
And you and Thickers are economists?
That's the one. I don't like to be too hard on him, though. It's not nice to
mock the afflicted and, apparently, he is 106 years old! Probably a nice old
boy when he's sober - although I don't think he ever is! We really should
humour him though, poor old sod. I'm told that 'when he's had a few' he
likes to dress up in his kilt and play Jimmy Shand records very loud. The
neighbours get very upset, but they 'understand'! He keeps telling them that
he was in charge of all the Navy's nuclear submarines and that he's 'best
mates' with the Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Charles. As I said, they
'understand'. Shame really. ;-)
You really can't take criticism can you.
Oh yes, almost forgot, the song was crap...
> You really can't take criticism can you.
Who says?
> Oh yes, almost forgot, the song was crap...
Well, it's not really written for the sitar.
;-)
Look at the end of the day I suppose we will just have to agree to
disagree, if you doubt my sincerity when I say I miss the 'cultural
mix" of London, then that is your problem. I have no hidden agenda
whatsoever, there is nothing "phoney" about my ideals or values,
however I view yours to be both divisive and dangerous.
We agree upon one thing, the continued dispossession of the Australian
Aboriginals. It does not sit well with me, and personally I find it
one of the most challenging aspects about living here. However after
the dark days of John Howard and his cohorts, Kevin Rudd has made
great strides forward, continuing on where Gough Whitlam left off in
the 1970s. The history of the late 18th century, 19th and 20th
centuries can not be undone, however the process of reconciliation is
gathering momentum.
Oh dear, 'divisive and dangerous' is it? Straight out of the New World Order
lexicon that one!
>We agree upon one thing, the continued dispossession of the Australian
>Aboriginals.
We do, what's that then?
>It does not sit well with me, and personally I find it
>one of the most challenging aspects about living here.However after
>the dark days of John Howard and his cohorts, Kevin Rudd has made
>great strides forward, continuing on where Gough Whitlam left off in
>the 1970s. The history of the late 18th century, 19th and 20th
>centuries can not be undone, however the process of reconciliation is
>gathering momentum.
Oh right, so I take it you're getting the next plane back? Surely you can't
think of occupying someone else's land a moment longer? Must have been quite
a shock to you when you got out there and found out about this
'dispossession' business! Mind, I would have thought that you'd have been
back before now - especially with you missing London, and its 'diversity',
and all that. Hurry back, you'd love it, apparently it's getting better
every day! Not Wembley, though, I gather that the last white person 'left' a
couple of years back and 'they' aren't letting any more back in - except for
football matches', of course, as long as they go straight home after!
Your country was in fiscal deficit before the Northern Rock fiasco.
You are clearly one of the English halfwits who expect Scotland to pay
the tuition fees of England's students as well as its own. Is there no
end to English sponging off Scotland? Isn't the revenue from
Scotland's oil enough for you?
Is it the colour of peoples' skin you object to, Varmer?
The question was for Thickers, Pauline, but you can have a go if you like -
as long as you don't forget the one you snipped!
I wish I could play one, and, be honest, so do you...
[banal drivel snipped]
You should probably stick to finger painting you foolish cunt
In what way are you sinking Robert's country?
Your rabid racism becomes clearer with every post Mr Giles.
BTW I do get back to London whenever possible. I was last there only 5
weeks ago.
Would you please define this 'racism' for me please?
And then tell me that if a preference to live amongst one's own people - and
to preserve one's chosen way of life - is 'racism', then why is that so
wrong, especially when that is what virtually all the people in the world
choose to do?
>BTW I do get back to London whenever possible. I was last there only 5
>weeks ago.
And you went back? Back to live amongst the 'dispossessers' in someone
else's land? Good God, man, have you no shame!
You dont want to breed and catch up with the ethnics do you? Well sorry to
tell you they DO have a right to procreate as they wish..time to pack yer
bags and move I think. Australia is multicultural and its doin FINE...:)
Freaking whining poms..had enough of you lot..you all think you're related
to HRH Liz...the world wasnt created with borders for races..people born of
this Earth have a right to live anywhere on the planet as long as they can
get thru the BS redtape...
Hello! Hello! Looks like 'Jellore' has got himself another sockpuppet!
Uh, no. Lu participates regularly in alt.guitar, which is one of the
groups to which your friend WS maliciously posted his initial rant.
To save any further and unnecessary encroachment on my part, this will be my
last post in this thread.
>
>"Paul C" <pa...@omne.uk.net> wrote in message
>news:jn6dj5ldqbs0q0h50...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 22:07:06 -0000, "Farmer Giles" <Gi...@nospam.com>
>> wrote:
>>>will ask you a couple of questions and hope that
>>>you will give me a straight and honest answer. Would you be happy to see
>>>the
>>>city of Edinburgh with a minority white population?
>>
>> Is it the colour of peoples' skin you object to, Varmer?
>
>The question was for Thickers, Pauline, but you can have a go if you like -
>as long as you don't forget the one you snipped!
>
No answer, I see.
> You are clearly one of the English halfwits who expect Scotland to pay
> the tuition fees of England's students as well as its own.
Er... no. I expect that Scotland should pay for its own students rather
than the current system where England pays for its own students while
Scotland benefits from student loans that they don't have to pay (SLC)
while England and Wales pay loans to Government sharks staffed by Scotland.
> Is there no
> end to English sponging off Scotland? Isn't the revenue from
> Scotland's oil enough for you?
Our money made North Sea Oil profitable. The part of Scotland south of
Edinburgh should belong to England in the first place so they can
fucking whistle for it.
>> Uh, no. Lu participates regularly in alt.guitar, which is one of the
>> groups to which your friend WS maliciously posted his initial rant.
There was nothing malicious about it. It's relevant to all the groups
and multi-posting is considered worse than cross-posting so I was simply
obeying netiqette.
> Fair enough. I was forgetting just how many groups this was posted to. I
> post only from upm and, although I don't generally care for threads which
> are widely crossposted, I don't see it as my function to alter what the
> originator of the thread initially intended.
I don't know what BitchHell is complaining about in the first instance.
He chose to killfile me so he could have been consistent and simply
ignored this thread.
> Freaking whining poms..had enough of you lot..you all think you're related
> to HRH Liz...
No we don't, but we do know that we're not all descended from criminals.
> the world wasnt created with borders for races..
People enforce borders.
> people born of
> this Earth have a right to live anywhere on the planet as long as they can
> get thru the BS redtape...
People have the right to inhabit a country according to its laws. Under
a democratic system, people have the right to push for laws to be changed...
> People have the right to inhabit a country according to its laws. Under
> a democratic system, people have the right to push for laws to be
> changed...
Weren't you advocating arson in places of worship a few weeks ago?
> You should probably stick to finger painting you foolish cunt
I finger painted your sister and tickled her pink.
> White Spirit wrote:
>> Well, it's not really written for the sitar.
> I wish I could play one, and, be honest, so do you...
Not my cup of tea. I won't deny that they require skill but I'm far too
Western in my tastes for me to want to pick up something Eastern...
> White Spirit wrote:
>> People have the right to inhabit a country according to its laws.
>> Under a democratic system, people have the right to push for laws to
>> be changed...
> Weren't you advocating arson in places of worship a few weeks ago?
I did suggest that it would be a suitable form of protest. You can't
complain - you often defend the idea of political violence 'in certain
circumstances'.
>Paul C wrote:
>
>> You are clearly one of the English halfwits who expect Scotland to pay
>> the tuition fees of England's students as well as its own.
>
>Er... no. I expect that Scotland should pay for its own students rather
>than the current system where England pays for its own students while
>Scotland benefits from student loans that they don't have to pay (SLC)
>while England and Wales pay loans to Government sharks staffed by Scotland.
What utter nonsense. The choice of the English majority in the UK
Parliament is that English students pay fees. The choice of the
Scottish Parliament is that student fees are paid out of Scottish
Government at the expense of other things. I think you will find its
one more indications that Scots value education that little bit more
than the English.
>
>> Is there no
>> end to English sponging off Scotland? Isn't the revenue from
>> Scotland's oil enough for you?
>
>Our money made North Sea Oil profitable.
Did it? How did your (sic) money make NS Oil profitable?
>The part of Scotland south of
>Edinburgh should belong to England in the first place so they can
>fucking whistle for it.
I think you will be whistling for the part of Scotland south of
Edinburgh to be English, turps.
The guitar descends from the Turkish Oud.
Mind you, I'd like a go at one of those as well...
Oh yes, political violence remains a valid form.
But as a general rule burning places of worship to the ground isn't
usually considered a valid political act, except by bigots.
Easy. Intolerance, discriminatory, prejudiced, antagonistic, in fact
the sort of values and ideals that you are your mate WS bang on about
on usenet.
And what if some people choose to live elsewhere?
I came back to work, family....oh and of course the sun.
Running away again?
> White Spirit wrote:
>>> Weren't you advocating arson in places of worship a few weeks ago?
>> I did suggest that it would be a suitable form of protest. You can't
>> complain - you often defend the idea of political violence 'in certain
>> circumstances'.
> Oh yes, political violence remains a valid form.
> But as a general rule burning places of worship to the ground isn't
> usually considered a valid political act, except by bigots.
The problem you have there is that Islam is largely a political force,
not simply a religious one.