How many support child molestation, YOU do....
"A Galaxy poll, commissioned by the progressive political movement GetUp!
and obtained by The Age, surveyed 1100 people last weekend."
So where were the poll subjects?
Not that it matters two specks of fly shit. Some pack of left wing fuckwits
surveyed their left wing bum buddies and came up with a creative result..
Now go out and ask the rest of Australia what they think.
Ask Aussie Ramrod the pedophile, NAMBLA's poster boy what he/it
thinks..
"Boob has some pretty sad ideas of perversion.
http://www.nambla.org/parade1.jpg
A group of people watching a parade of people marching.
Oh how perverted"--Ramrod shows his true colors and it
isn't the rainbow..
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/msg/30373b3cb419ebce?
It may surprise you, but most political groups that pay for polls want
accurate results - they need accurate results for planning purposes
(as in, where do we put our limited financial resources for maximum
effect). They may advertise a fake poll for political reasons (i.e.,
marketing), but what they really do need real ones.
Interesting, you cannot refute the message that a poll in Australia shows
57% supports for Gay Marriage, so you try and discredit it me.
So, as I originally posted, a Poll on Australia shows that 57% of the people
polled support Gay Marriage, and more support some sort of gay marriage or
gay union.
Suck on that and choke.
> Ask Aussie Ramrod the pedophile, NAMBLA's poster boy
Blobby, did you realize that Australia is not in North America?
Stupid fuckwit! "College educated" indeed!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Scotty, did they fellate the poll respondents before they polled them
or after? Inquiring minds want to know.
Ask the Age newspaper
>
> Not that it matters two specks of fly shit. Some pack of left wing
> fuckwits surveyed their left wing bum buddies and came up with a creative
> result.. Now go out and ask the rest of Australia what they think.
Listen you sawn off little runt, it would not matter if the Catholic Church
itself did a survey showing most people wanted Gay Marriage, you would not
believe it as your pipsqueak head is stuck too far in the sand.
I have no idea about their sample or methodology. All I know is that
Blobby thinks that Australia is in North America. And I find that to
be much more interesting.
That sand was turned into glass so the world
could see how faggotry turned good into perversion.
Then you are just as stupid as you seem. Why would an Aussie be a
poster child for an organization that starts its name with "North
American"?
Take that up with the Catholic church. Write to the goddamned pope.
We have no problem with that.
You know the old saying Boob, Stick N stones.
The simple facts are that you bigots are losing all around the civilized
western world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Brazil
Brazil could easily be the most gay-friendly country in South America with a
population of 190 million of which 73% is Roman Catholic Homosexuality has
been legal in Brazil since 1830.Same-sex civil unions have been established
at the state level in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. A court decision has
been pending since 2005 on legalizing marriage nationwide
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/112133.htm
Three million watch Gay Parade in San Paulo
UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France, Portugal,
South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in their armed
forces without any great problems it seems.
Many of the civilized countries now permit gay Marriages and Gay Unions, or
ar considering them.
http://www.gcn.ie/content/templates/newsupdate.aspx?articleid=2342&zoneid=4
Ireland, another Catholic country is considering granting Gay Union rights.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/872677.html
The holy city of Jerusalem is having a Gay Pride March
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Gay-Marriage.php
Gay marriage is to be voted on in New York.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20070618-1338-gayrights.html
Gay rights are being excepted around the country
Here in Australia a poll showed that 57 % thought that Gays should be
allowed to marry.
In the US :-
Gay Unions are slowly being accepted.
Repealing of the sodomy laws
Gay Marriages
Gays getting benefits for their partners.
Churches accepting Gays
The pinnacle of bigotry, the Ku Klux Klan, all but finished
Poll after poll showing how people are accepting Gays more and more.
The bigots are showing up in such a poor light, people are laughing at them.
=========================================================
Cretins like Boob and Garngetfukt are a dying breed.
>Maybe the guy likes to travel a lot!
Maybe you should - to where they left your brain when they removed it.
>
>> Not that it matters two specks of fly shit. Some pack of left wing
>> fuckwits surveyed their left wing bum buddies and came up with a creative
>> result.. Now go out and ask the rest of Australia what they think.
>
>
>
> Listen you sawn off little runt, it would not matter if the Catholic
> Church itself did a survey showing most people wanted Gay Marriage, you
> would not believe it as your pipsqueak head is stuck too far in the sand.
One more time, arse bandit, where were the poll subjects?
Atually, they want results that further their cause, whatever it may be.
>
> Cretins like Boob and Garngetfukt are a dying breed.-
There's the next generation, freak. They hate you too!
"Boob has some pretty sad ideas of perversion.
http://www.nambla.org/parade1.jpg
A group of people watching a parade of people marching.
Oh how perverted"--ramrod shows his true colors and it
Typical usenet tactic - cut a very short paragraph because you can't
address the point. Here it is what was cut:
It may surprise you, but most political groups that pay for polls want
accurate results - they need accurate results for planning purposes
(as in, where do we put our limited financial resources for maximum
effect). They may advertise a fake poll for political reasons (i.e.,
marketing), but they really do need real ones.
> Atually, they want results that further their cause, whatever it may be.
Actually, you don't understand how things work. They don't "further
their cause" by making decisions based on bad data.
Look up what TV advertising costs. They need accurate poll results
so they can tell if these advertising campaigns are having the desired
effect. They may run different ads in different parts of the country
and bracket those with polls to see what effect the ads have. Then
they can use the most effective ones everywhere.
Now, they will selectively release poll results to the public (showing
only good news), but don't think they are getting bogus results from
Gallop or any of the other companies that do this sort of thing
professionally.
God you are thick, even for a stupid sawn off runt, in Australia of course.
BTW do your own research.
> "Garngetfukt" <garng...@fuckem.com> wrote in message
> >>>
> >>> So where were the poll subjects?
> >>
> > I asked YOU, shitty dick.
> >
> > One more time, arse bandit, where were the poll subjects?
>
>
> God you are thick, even for a stupid sawn off runt, in Australia of course.
>
At an AIDS Pride parade?
Yes, but as people become more and more educated, there are less and less
bigots.
At the moment, there are only the stupid ones left............
Are your children bigots also :-)
=================================
Proof that people are becoming educated and are turning away from bigotry.
We don't care what the spawn of convicts do, say or think, it's
irrelevant.
.
>
> Suck on that and choke.
pedophile...
> UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France, Portugal,
> South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in their armed
> forces without any great problems it seems.
Yeah, and a small contingent of our Girl Scouts could knock off any
country you just listed.
Not a Superpower in the bunch.
> I'm college educated
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ShittyFLL is a proven liar and keep in mind that he will netKKKop you
if he/she can. Of course he can't netKKKop moi, because I am
anonymized to perfection. My usenet longevity is proof positive of
that assertion.
My pet monkey lc, recently named "Little Cunt" {Also a netKKKop
wannabe} thinks I live in Vancouver. Impotent psycho stalker sniper
308 aka "cap-gun" thinks I live in Virginia. Pathetic colon choker
jaye elke thinks I live in Indiana. Which one of the Three Spooges do
you think is right? Moe, Larry, Curley or none of the above?
We all remember when a foolishly confident ShittyFLL posted this
priceless gem:
"I think we'll be seeing less of bobandcarole around these here
parts...at least while I'm around"--faggot ScottyFLL
A tagline for the ages to be sure!
After I shoved his delusional rant down his throat,
he lied and said he didn't post it after it was
witnessed by everyone.
We've seen less of faggot ShittyFLL but not me.
Just as I knew it would be, of course. He was doomed to
failure from day one. And I'll be here.."as long as scotty is
around" :-)
We can't help but mention the fact that ShittyFLL is a chronic
alcoholic as evidenced by his posts in alt.recovery.aa. He
has no discipline or self control. One has to wonder if his
babbling tirades regarding me are fueled by 100 proof. :-)
We've established the fact that scotty WILL lie...about what he posts
and about his deviant habits and lifestyle. And he/it will lie about
other purveyors of truth like myself. Also we've established the fact
that he is a pisshead, which could explain his incoherent babbling and
his willingness to believe posts with forged headers are authentic.
He's a liar, a faggot AND a pussy netKKKop. You can't get much lower
than that.
Oh, did I mention he is a flaming homo that ingests sperm and he has
many disgusting homo/freak fetishes?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.flame.faggots/msg/7a684d3c7919c791?
<Tosses ScottyFLL a five spot>
Have another drink Shitty, this one's on me....
>From the gloryhole that ShittyFLL mans regularly:
"Squirt! Squirt!" ROTF!!!!!!
Wouldn't that excite your tiny tits.
Not as thick as you, shit lips. I know what my dick is for. I don't abuse my
dick by poking it in shit like you do.
even for a stupid sawn off runt,
Sawn of? You want to provide some proof, rectum boy?
in Australia of course.
>
> BTW do your own research.
I'm asking you, arse fucker, to substantiate your shit dribling rant.
As always, you fail.
I often wish we (the US) were the pricks most of the world accuses us
of being. Man, could we ever REALLY kick some ass bigtime.
We are, Amanda.
It's sort of like going to jail for being a rapist without ever
getting laid!
It's more like a rapist going to jail for raping his victims.
Too bad we couldn't deport every last one of you fucking America-
hating cocksuckers. North Korea or China would be my two top picks.
Wanting better for my beloved country doesn't make me less of a
devoted American.
> Too bad we couldn't deport every last one of you fucking America-
> hating cocksuckers. North Korea or China would be my two top picks.
by "we," are you referring to cleo and marie and amanda and the other
names you post under?
--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.
Where have we all heard that crapola before? Whatever yu do, never
"improve" my house. I would likely find it burned to the ground with
you presenting me a bill for the improvements.
>On Jun 22, 3:18 pm, Senrab Nageek <senrab.nag...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 22, 5:14 pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
[...]
>> > It's sort of like going to jail for being a rapist without ever
>> > getting laid!
>> It's more like a rapist going to jail for raping his victims.
>Too bad we couldn't deport every last one of you fucking America-
>hating cocksuckers. North Korea or China would be my two top picks.
Fortunately, what's left of the Constitution still wrecks that wet dream of
yours, Amanda. (This American shoots back at slugs like you.)
--
Patrick "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
chiefinstigator.us.tt/aeros.php (TCI's 2006-07 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: San Antonio 4, Houston 2 (April 15)
NEXT GAME: October 2007, date/place/opponent TBA
I expect you would like that to be the case so you could discredit the poll.
A Galaxy poll here is similar to the US Gallup poll, so one cannot see
either of them doing such a poll at an AIDS parade.
The Galaxy polls are taken out by various political parties here (and
others), and if any funny business was to take place, then they would not
have them do their polls, as no one would believe them.
Too bad to, you were on a roll till you told me that.
> I expect you would like that to be the case so you could discredit the poll.
>
> A Galaxy poll here is similar to the US Gallup poll, so one cannot see
> either of them doing such a poll at an AIDS parade.
>
> The Galaxy polls are taken out by various political parties here (and
> others), and if any funny business was to take place, then they would
> not have them do their polls, as no one would believe them.
Of course, one *could* imagine Gallop or Galaxy being hired to do a
poll at an "AIDS parade" (whatever the hell that is), for example,
on behalf of a drug manufacturer curious about how many of the
particpants saw or remembered the company's advertisements.
Both Gallop and Galaxy would take a very dim view of someone
claiming such a poll was a public opinion poll representative of
a whole country (such lies would hurt the polling company's
credibility). There is probably some contractural thing forbidding
that - they'd almost have to put that in for self-preservation -
with Gallop or Gallaxy being allowed to issue a statement that no
such poll exists if the sample or results were misrepresented.
Of course, such polls of very specific sub-populations are typically
done only for marketing perposes and companies in general consider
their marketing data to be confidential.
These days, Gallop or Galaxy could distribute its results as a PDF
file, each with a report ID, and publish a digitial signature for the
report, separate from the report. If anyone tries to pull anything,
all you have to do then is to ask to see the PDF file and check
whatever they give you against the signature. There is no known way
other than exhaustive search (with some very small chance of an
accidental match) of turning a digital signature into an original,
so confidentiality is not a problem in practice.
Why? Gallop is a respected company. If you see people misusing the
results of a Gallop poll, what they will typically do is to take quite
a few polls and then publish the "best" results. If you poll about one
thousand people, you have an error of around 3 percent, and that is
the standard deviation so a small fraction of cases will be off by
more than that.
Political parties typically use polls with errors of around 3 percent
for practical reasons: to double the accuracy, you have to increase
the sample size by a factor of four. They'd rather spend the money on
doing more polls over time so that they can track trends, but they
don't want each poll to be highly inaccurate either. The 3 percent
accuracy simply reflects the tradeoff they make between more polls
versus more accurate polls, each option assuming a fixed budget.
I know it is hard for a lot of people to understand, but with the
high cost of TV advertising (a must in most political campaigns, at
least in the U.S.), you really need to monitor how well you are
doing, and you can't afford to get you polls done by a group of
flakes.
Now that's something even you self proclaimed superior intellect queers
should be able to understand.
Oh, of course, you think poking your dick up your boyfriend's arse is
normal.
'Nuff said.
> "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod@truth_only.com> wrote in message
> news:Pv%ei.17424$wH4....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> >
> > >
> > The Galaxy polls are taken out by various political parties here (and
> > others), and if any funny business was to take place, then they would not
> > have them do their polls, as no one would believe them.
> >
> Show me a person who believes a party political poll and I'll show you a
> congenitally gullible fuckwit. A small sample of a population in a city
> centre does not make a nationally representative sample.
You can believe Gallop and (I presume from what RamRod said, Galaxy)
polls, but that doesn't mean you should trust what a political party
puts out in a press release. You can bet your ass, though that the
poltical parties pay for scientifically valid polls even if they
just use the polls internally.
if someone makes a claim on the basis of poll results, Just keep in
mind the margin of error (and if someone doesn't report that, don't
trust what that person says about the results beyond that the mean
value came out as such and such for that sample, which doesn't tell
you much).
> if someone makes a claim on the basis of poll results, Just keep in
> mind the margin of error (and if someone doesn't report that, don't
> trust what that person says about the results beyond that the mean
> value came out as such and such for that sample, which doesn't tell
> you much).
When someone calls asking questions on the phone, I tell
them the most outrageous things I can think of, lol.
But your government denies rights to your country's aborigines that
all non-aborigines have. Why are you Australians so hypocritical?
They're all worried about marrying off the poofters.
Who are the superpowers, Blobby? List them for us. LOL!!
Exactly like you post here...............
There's only one, and lucky for your little faggot ass it's the United
States. Otherwise you'd be hanging from a rope in Iran, a brick wall
collapsed on your head in Afghanistan or run over by a tank in some
Chinese city.
I simply hang up.
But in any case, don't think that Gallop doesn't know how to handle
flakes like you. :-)
Well here is what is being said in the USA, and around the Civilized Western
World
http://www.pollingreport.com/civil.htm
89% think Gays should have equal rights
8% think they should not
Here is what The Christian Post has to say.
57 percent of the American public believes homosexuality should be
sanctioned as an acceptable alternative lifestyle
-----------------------------------------------
54 percent of respondents favor civil unions for gay and lesbian couples
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4496265/
-----------------------------------------------
Gallup Poll. May 10-13, 2007. N=1,003 adults nationwide. MoE Ä… 3.
It says that in a poll 56% of people think Gays should have equal rights as
far as work goes.
78% favour hate crime laws.
50% favour either Gay Unions or Gay Marriage.
79% favour Gays to be allowed to serve in the military
57% think that Gays or Lesbians should be allowed to adopt children.
-------------------------------------
Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates
International. March 14-15, 2007. N=1,001 adults nationwide. MoE Ä… 3.
63% think Gays should be allowed to serve in the military
50% think Gays and Lesbians should be allowed to enere into Gay Unions or
gay Marriage.
--------------------------------------------------
CBS News/New York Times Poll. Oct. 27-31, 2006. N=1,084 adults nationwide.
MoE Ä… 3 (for all adults).
57% in favour of Gay Marriage or Gay Unions.
-------------------------------------------------
Newsweek Poll conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates
International. Oct. 26-27, 2006. N=1,002 adults nationwide. MoE Ä… 3 (for all
adults).
50% in favour of Gay Marriage or Gay Unions
-------------------------------------------------
Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and Pew Forum on Religion &
Public Life survey conducted by Schulman, Ronca & Bucuvalas (SRBI). July
6-19, 2006. Adults nationwide. (June 2006 and earlier conducted by Princeton
Survey Research Associates International.)
57% think gays and Lesbians couples should be able to enter into legal
agreements with each other that would give them many of the same rights as
married couples
-------------------------------------------------
FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll. June 13-14, 2006. N=900 registered
voters nationwide. MoE Ä… 3.
52% think that Gays and Lesbians should be able to get legally married, or
allowed a legal partnership similar to but not called marriage
-------------------------------
Gallup Values poll: gay rights May 07
89% think Gays should have equal rights for jobs
59% think Homosexual relations should be legal
57 think Homosexuality should be considered an aternative lifestyle.
==================================
Of course the best one was when the Bigot group American Family planning
association
had a poll and had hoped to get a favourable rest (in their eyes) had to
cancel it as they did not get the answer they wanted :-)
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/2004/01/61982
But the AFA never counted on the power of the Internet. And once the URL to
the poll escaped its intended audience, everything went haywire. As of Jan.
19, 60 percent of respondents -- more than 508,000 voters -- said, "I favor
legalization of homosexual marriage." With an additional 7.89 percent -- or
66,732 voters -- replying, "I favor a 'civil union' with the full benefits
of marriage except for the name," the AFA's chosen position, "I oppose
legalization of homosexual marriage and 'civil unions,'" was being defeated
by a 2-1 ratio.
-----------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Brazil
Brazil could easily be the most gay-friendly country in South America with a
population of 190 million of which 73% is Roman Catholic Homosexuality has
been legal in Brazil since 1830.Same-sex civil unions have been
established at the state level in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. A court
decision has
been pending since 2005 on legalizing marriage nationwide
---------------------------------------
http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/112133.htm
Three million watch Gay Parade in San Paulo
--------------------------------------
UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France,
Portugal,
South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in their
armed
forces without any great problems it seems.
Many of the civilized countries now permit gay Marriages and Gay Unions,
or ar considering them.
--------------------------------------
http://www.gcn.ie/content/templates/newsupdate.aspx?articleid=2342&zoneid=4
Ireland, another Catholic country is considering granting Gay Union
rights.
---------------------------------------
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/872677.html
The holy city of Jerusalem is having a Gay Pride March
------------------------------------------
http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/06/19/america/NA-GEN-US-Gay-Marriage.php
Gay marriage is to be voted on in New York.
---------------------------------------
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20070618-1338-gayrights.html
Gay rights are being excepted around the country
-------------------------------------
Here in Australia a poll showed that 57 % thought that Gays should be
allowed to marry.
-----------------------------------
In the US :-
Gay Unions are slowly being accepted.
Repealing of the sodomy laws
Gay Marriages
Gays getting benefits for their partners.
Churches accepting Gays
The pinnacle of bigotry, the Ku Klux Klan, all but finished
Poll after poll showing how people are accepting Gays more and more.
The bigots are showing up in such a poor light, people are laughing at
them.
=========================================================
Well maybe you had better send those same girl scouts to Iraq, to win the
war there................
Well Iraq is not a super power, but your military is losing over there big
time.
It is not that the average Joe in the US is bad, he is not, but it is the
silly Bigot Brigade, and your interfering in other countries politics that
causes you so much grief.
If the US had not been sticking its nose into the middle east politics, and
supporting Israel, then the world trade centers would still be standing
today, and all those US military personnel who have been killed, would be
enjoying life.
Exactly the point, they skrew with the responses to suit an out-come.
> "No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message news:87sl8i4...@nospam.pacbell.net...
> > " Death" <De...@yourdoor.net> writes:
> >
> > > "No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message >
> > >
> > > > if someone makes a claim on the basis of poll results, Just keep in
> > > > mind the margin of error (and if someone doesn't report that, don't
> > > > trust what that person says about the results beyond that the mean
> > > > value came out as such and such for that sample, which doesn't tell
> > > > you much).
> > >
> > > When someone calls asking questions on the phone, I tell
> > > them the most outrageous things I can think of, lol.
> >
> > I simply hang up.
> >
> > But in any case, don't think that Gallop doesn't know how to handle
> > flakes like you. :-)
>
> Exactly the point, they skrew with the responses to suit an out-come.
Wrong - they know how to eliminate obviously bogus responses. I
won't clue you in as to how they might do that, but you might
consider that Gallop is paid to produce the most accurate polls
possible given the sample size.
So what you're saying is that the United States is the superpower, and
that being a superpower is good, and that the United States is
becoming tolerant of gays (unlike Iran or Afghanistan, as you mention
above), so it then follows that being tolerant of gays is good.
I understand you now!
No they don't: they don't "skrew" with the responses to suit an outcome.
They don't even skew the responses.
Make up your mind and take a stand. By now your
knees must be sore.
I see you passed on taking a stand.
So far you have had it both ways:
1. they skrew with the responses
2. they don't skrew with the responses.
What a childish game you play.
> "No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message news:87odj69...@nospam.pacbell.net...
> > " Death" <De...@yourdoor.net> writes:
> >
> >
> > Back to non sequitur replies due to having nothing to say?
>
> I see you passed on taking a stand.
> So far you have had it both ways:
> 1. they skrew with the responses
> 2. they don't skrew with the responses.
>
> What a childish game you play.
Liar - Gallop does not skew the poll results ("skrew" is your
consistent mispelling) and I never said they did.
They can eliminate obviously bogus responses from people making
up silly answers or otherwise playing games with them (which
is what *you* admitted doing) but they will not eliminate
data simply because someone doesn't like the results.
lol ain't the written word a bitch?
"No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
> > > > >
> > > > > But in any case, don't think that Gallop doesn't know how to handle
> > > > > flakes like you. :-)
> > >
> > > Wrong - they know how to eliminate obviously bogus responses. I
> > > won't clue you in as to how they might do that,
and update your education, I did not intend to use, screw.
Having nothing to say, "Death" is now splicing in multiple
messages out of a desparate attempt to keep a discusion going.
> "No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
> >
> > Liar - Gallop does not skew the poll results ("skrew" is your
> > consistent mispelling) and I never said they did.
> >
>
> lol ain't the written word a bitch?
As I said ...
<snip>
> and update your education, I did not intend to use, screw.
The correct word is "skew", not "skrew".
> " Death" <De...@yourdoor.net> writes:
> >
> > lol ain't the written word a bitch?
"No One" <no...@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
> > > > >
No, that is not the word or its meaning that
I used, but thanks for whining.
(He probably just checked a dictionary and found that "skrew" was
missing.)
> > " Death" <De...@yourdoor.net> writes:
(note the snip because he didn't want anyone to see his use of
the non-word "skrew", which he repeated in a number of posts.)
> > > No, that is not the word or its meaning that
> > > I used, but thanks for whining.
What a liar! In Message-ID:
<2Tgfi.12501$19.1...@bignews5.bellsouth.net>, "Death" wrote, "... they
skrew with the responses to suit an out-come."
^^^^^
I've underlined it for you.
China with around 2 million in its armed forces plus atomic weapons should
not be under rated...................
> skrew with the responses to suit an out-come."
That's the word, skrew.
Moron - that's what I said you said and there is no such
word as "skrew".
>
>"Liberalism's A Sickness" <drou...@guerrillamail.net> wrote in message
>news:1182542878.4...@o11g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 22, 11:21 am, "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod@truth_only.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France,
>>> Portugal,
>>> South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in their
>>> armed
>>> forces without any great problems it seems.
>>
>> Yeah, and a small contingent of our Girl Scouts could knock off any
>> country you just listed.
>
>
>Well maybe you had better send those same girl scouts to Iraq, to win the
>war there................
No, we accepted your 467 (P)aussie mess cooks and bakers you sent
rather that the girl scouts New Zealand was willing to send in your
place and claimed that they were better soldiers.
You see it, yes?
>
>"bobandcarole" <bobandc...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:1182543294.2...@i38g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 22, 4:07?pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
>> <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
>>> On Jun 22, 11:21 am, "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod@truth_only.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France,
>>> > Portugal,
>>> > South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in their
>>> > armed
>>> > forces without any great problems it seems.
>>>
>>> Yeah, and a small contingent of our Girl Scouts could knock off any
>>> country you just listed.
>>
>> Not a Superpower in the bunch.
>
>
>Well Iraq is not a super power, but your military is losing over there big
>time.
But sweet cakes, Saddam and Iraq's ass was kicked as soon as we got
the first boots on the ground. The fight there after has been with the
Fanatical Islamic Terrorist coming in from a number of mid-eastern
countries. If you think otherwise wait until the first suicide bomber
kills a few hundred in downtown Sydney and we'll see how quickly
you begin to sing a different tune.
>
>"Liberalism's A Sickness" <drou...@guerrillamail.net> wrote in message
>news:1182622209.5...@o61g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 23, 7:55 am, ScottyFLL <zmsscor...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> On Jun 22, 4:14 pm, bobandcarole <bobandcarole...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Jun 22, 4:07?pm, Liberalism's A Sickness
>>>
>>> > <droug...@guerrillamail.net> wrote:
>>> > > On Jun 22, 11:21 am, "RamRod Sword of Baal" <RamRod@truth_only.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>>
>>> > > > UK, Denmark, Israel, Sweden, Germany, Australia, Belgium, France,
>>> > > > Portugal,
>>> > > > South Korea, Spain, Netherlands, are a some that permit Gays in
>>> > > > their armed
>>> > > > forces without any great problems it seems.
>>>
>>> > > Yeah, and a small contingent of our Girl Scouts could knock off any
>>> > > country you just listed.
>>>
>>> > Not a Superpower in the bunch.
>>>
>>> Who are the superpowers, Blobby? List them for us. LOL!!
>>
>> There's only one, and lucky for your little faggot ass it's the United
>> States.
>
>China with around 2 million in its armed forces plus atomic weapons should
>not be under rated...................
Who can they attack and then survive? With Russia, South Korea, India,
Pakistan and last but not least the US with the pacific fleet (surface
and submarine), thousands of troops in and about Asia,
inter-continental atomic warhead missiles, long range bombers based in
Guam and far more weaponry available that the public has no idea of,
looking down China's throat. China is not so stupid (as you are) as to
think they are even close to being able to be aggressive militarily
anywhere in the world.
Just a cotten picken minute, I said they should not be under rated, not that
they were going to attack.
Why should they attack the US when they own it :-)
The US is in hock to China to it eyeballs (Thanks Mr Bush) , if China dumped
its US $$$$ on the market, the US $$$ would collapse, and the US ecomomy
with it.
We had all better pray that does not happen.
Much of our current fight is with Sunni and Shia groups who don't
particularly want to fight with us, but simply want us out of the way
so they can kill each other.
Yes and we remember when you jealous foreigners were saying the same
thing about Japan. You of the 3rd world better pray that the US never
loses it's position of #1 economy in the world because if it happens
you're all going down the porcelain chute.
>We had all better pray that does not happen.
Bet you trailer rent on it.
And the results they make public are the "facts" that make themselves or
their current issue look good.
they need accurate results for planning purposes
> (as in, where do we put our limited financial resources for maximum
> effect). They may advertise a fake poll for political reasons (i.e.,
> marketing), but they really do need real ones.
>
>> Atually, they want results that further their cause, whatever it may be.
>
> Actually, you don't understand how things work.
Actually, shit for brains, I do know.
They don't "further
> their cause" by making decisions based on bad data.
>
> Look up what TV advertising costs.
I know what advertising costs, numb nuts. Television advertising cost
depends on day, time of day and program being broadcast.. Varies from
expensive to FUCKING expensive.
http://www.getup.org.au/about/faq/
"GetUp is led by Executive Director Brett Solomon, who has been working on
social justice and development issues for more than ten years. In that time
he founded the International Youth Parliament with Oxfam and worked as the
Campaign Coordinator at Amnesty International Australia.
GetUp was founded by Jeremy Heimans and David Madden, two young Australian
graduates of Harvard University's Kennedy School of Government"
> Not that it matters two specks of fly shit. Some pack of left wing
> fuckwits surveyed their left wing bum buddies and came up with a creative
> result.. Now go out and ask the rest of Australia what they think.
>
So that proves that aussies are really fucking hommo's then...I
always new those fuckers were queer. Or mayabe its the queen moms way
of invoking "birthcontrol" over her subjects....When was the last 2
lesbo's had a real kid or two butt fucking fags ever had a butt hole
baby , well with the exception of TYNK or Ron Schompert
Come back and try posting when you have learnt the basic points of writing
coherent language, shit for brians.