Re: MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still defenda Natural Affection from BIGOT HOMOS like "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯)

CB

unread,

Nov 8, 2009, 12:40:50 PM11/8/09

to

"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
message news:fondf5t6762b1k1af...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:31:35 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
> <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still INFESTED
>>> with Hateful & Ignorant BIGOTS! **SHAME** on Most of the USA!!
>
>> So people that don't give Gays what ever they want are hateful?
>
> No -- but dolts who seek to DEPRIVE them of across-the-board
> EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) are.
>

The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether unatural
affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins, man
and wife prevail.

At some point it must dawn on you that YOU are the hateful bigot of natural
affection

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,

Nov 8, 2009, 2:32:25 PM11/8/09

to

"CB" is Now Competing with Bill Taylor and Jon Young ("IBen")
to be Usenet's Biggest DOLT.

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:40:50 -0500,
"CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:

> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still defenda Natural
> Affection from BIGOT HOMOS like "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��).

ROTFLMAO!!!!!

It's FUN to see bigoted losers like you SELF-DESTRUCTING in public
like that!

You PRETEND to be a Christian (which we *actual* Christians see
through in a heartbeat, since real Christians don't act the way YOU do).

You LIE like a rug. Trying to emulate the now-outed-as-a-lying-
slut Carrie Prejean, are you? Didn't you know that (UNlike abortion
and homosexuality), LYING is a breaking of the Big Ten? And you lie
constantly, here in Usenet.

And -- Jesus did NOT teach hatefulness -- and you just PROVED to
everyone that you are hateful to the point of being LOATHSOME.
Not to mention *also* being a CRUDE dolt.

And even though you know that I'm a *straight* ALLY of the gays
in their quest for EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) in Civil
Rights Movement II -- you apparently are too bone-DUMB to realize
that calling me gay is EXACTLY as "disturbing" to me as it would be
if you'd called me left-handed, or said that I had blue eyes. (I am
right-handed, and have hazel eyes.) Handedness, sexual orienta-
tion, race, and eye color are all TRIVIAL variations of NORMALCY
that people are BORN with:

http://www.ChristianEgalitarian.com/Orientation-at-Birth.html

Disparaging NORMAL people on the basis of TRIVIAL variations?

People don't GET any DUMBER than *you*, "CB."

You must be competing for that title with the doltish Bill Taylor
and "Jon Young"/"IBen Getiner."

> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the
> tyranny of activist judges.

ALL appellate court judges who do their jobs RIGHT hand down
decisions that either create or bolster fully-legal JUDICIAL LAW. Which
is second only in power to the Constitution itself.

DOLTISH cultist of the RRR make a LYING HABIT of whining
about "unelected, black-robed activist judges" whenever sensible
and egalitarian judges rule AGAINST their hate-agendas, as they
so intelligently did in the "Roe vs. Wade" and "Lawrence vs. Texas"
decisions.

But when EQUALLY-activist BIGOTED judges rule *against*
personal liberties, THEN the dishonest RRR cultists PRAISE those
hateful jerks by calling them "constructionist judges" -- and make
NO mention of the fact that they are every bit as unelected and
wear black robes.

Just goes to show hoe DESPERATE and DISHONEST the RRR
Cult truly is, in pursuing their hate-agendas: They TARGET and
CON people of lower intellect, because intelligent people see right
through their LIES in a heartbeat!

The ONLY judges who are TYRANNICA are the "constructionist"
ones (as the RRR cultists call them) who REPRESS or DESTROY
harmless personal liberties!

> When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether unatural

> affection...

[[[ READERS: That RRR-Cult-speak for the perfectly NORMAL
people who are born homosexual. ALL sexual orientations,
of course, are merely TRIVIAL variations of NORMALCY,
just like eye color, race, and handedness. The RRR Cult
DESPERATELY hopes that society as a whole does NOT come
to a full realization of that!! When THAT happens, it'll be
all OVER for the loathsome RRR Cult and its hate-agendas! ]]]

> ...is given Relative Moral Equivelance...

ANOTHER big LIE that the RRR Cult spews is the notion
that THINKING and intelligently weighing all relevant factors
in the decision-making process is something "despicable" that
they WHINE about and disparage, calling that process that
pretty much everyone does several times every day, "moral
relativism."

The RRR Cult's False-Teacher LEADERS are very crafty
psychologists who do a very adept job of CONNING low-intellect
people and teaching them key phrases to PARROT -- as "CB"
does. They COUNT on those lemmings to accomplish TWO
objectives: (1) Keep the BIGOTRY going, and (2) to be their
CASH COWS -- thus keeping their hate-organizations in business.

It's SAD when LOSERS like "CB" **fall** for that lying and
hateful tripe -- hook, line, and sinker!

One day SOON, society will reach critical mass in its full
REALIZTION of all of the above -- and put as FINAL an END
to the RRR Cult as happened decades earlier to the ignorant
and hateful segregationists.

And when THAT has happened -- just as happened 40+
years earlier, America will be a far BETTER country for being
RID of those forms of unconscionable and sociopathic bigotry.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The Inevitable Fate of Movements
of Intolerance in America

Society ALWAYS outgrows intolerant and hateful movements
that are mired in stupidity, and are supported by NO relevant
facts. ALWAYS. No exceptions! And our own history, here
in the USA, makes that very clear. Since 1865 ---

-- Slavery -- EXTINCT
-- Opposition to Women's Suffrage -- EXTINCT
-- Prohibition -- EXTINCT
-- Opposition to Birth-Control Pill -- EXTINCT
-- Segregation -- EXTINCT
-- Anti-Semitism -- ENDANGERED (Thankfully)
-- Anti-Choice (abortion) -- LAUGHINGSTOCK STATUS
-- Opposition to EQUAL Rights for Gays -- FADING FAST

Segregationists were a JOKE (i.e., "laughingstock status")
during the last few years before it became extinct. As opposition
to EQUAL rights for gays (with respect to housing, being parents,
marriage, and employment) continues to fade, the remaining
opponents first will become laughingstocks, and then that
hatefulness will end in extinction. constant consciousness-raising,
as is being assisted by the media in its sitcoms, talk shows, etc., is
very helpful.

The ludicrous and hateful actions and defense of sociopathic
agendas against individual liberties on the part of the adherents/
lemmings of the RRR Cult will soon lead to American society's
becoming EMBARRASSED to have those louts in their midst,
making our country a laughingstock in front of the entire world.
Even now, the process of their becoming FED UP with that is
building toward the critical mass that will trigger the *rejection*
of the RRR's **shameful** and worthless agendas. Before much
longer, society will reject those movements with all the force that
it brought to bear against segregation.

Historical precedents have CONSISTENTLY proven that
Americans **outgrow* movements of intolerance (such as ALL
of the above), and then REJECT them -- leaving them behind
FOREVER.

And *that* is EXTINCTION.

Very WELCOME extinction. As in, "Good riddance forever!"

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

�� Rest in Peace ��
�� George Richard Tiller, MD ��
�� A True American HERO! ��
�� August 8, 1941 � May 31, 2009 ��
�� Visit -- http://iamdrtiller.com ��

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

-- Craig Chilton <xana...@mchsi.com>

www.LayoffRemedy.com -- Unemployment Solution!
www.ChristianEgalitarian.com -- Fight the RRR Cult!
http://apifar.blogspot.com -- Tactics: Defending Human Rights
http://pro-christian.blogspot.com -- Exposing RRR Bigotry
www.shadowandillusion.com -- Learn "The LOPAQUA Secret!"
www.TravelForPay.org -- Learn how to get PAID to TRAVEL!

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,

Nov 8, 2009, 2:37:40 PM11/8/09

to

"Activest" Judges??? ROTFL!!! "CB" Again PROVES
His Abject IGNORANCE to Everyone!!

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:40:50 -0500,
"CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:

> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the
> tyranny of activist judges.

ALL appellate court judges who do their jobs RIGHT hand down

decisions that either create or bolster fully-legal JUDICIAL LAW. Which
is second only in power to the Constitution itself.

DOLTISH cultist of the RRR make a LYING HABIT of whining
about "unelected, black-robed activist judges" whenever sensible
and egalitarian judges rule AGAINST their hate-agendas, as they
so intelligently did in the "Roe vs. Wade" and "Lawrence vs. Texas"
decisions.

But when EQUALLY-activist BIGOTED judges rule *against*
personal liberties, THEN the dishonest RRR cultists PRAISE those
hateful jerks by calling them "constructionist judges" -- and make
NO mention of the fact that they are every bit as unelected and
wear black robes.

Just goes to show hoe DESPERATE and DISHONEST the RRR
Cult truly is, in pursuing their hate-agendas: They TARGET and
CON people of lower intellect, because intelligent people see right
through their LIES in a heartbeat!

The ONLY judges who are TYRANNICA are the "constructionist"
ones (as the RRR cultists call them) who REPRESS or DESTROY
harmless personal liberties!

> When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether unatural

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,

Nov 8, 2009, 3:11:03 PM11/8/09

to

"Activist" Judges??? ROTFL!!! "CB" Again PROVES

Message has been deleted

CB

unread,

Nov 8, 2009, 9:46:51 PM11/8/09

to

<smo...@board.com> wrote in message
news:eihef5p522cmlj2ap...@4ax.com...

> On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 12:40:50 -0500, "CB"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>

>>The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
>>activist judges
>

> BWHHAHAHAHA
>
> That's how you Bush you dumb cocksucker
>

We know who the cock suckers are now don't we, homo?

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 10, 2009, 11:38:35 PM11/10/09

to

CB wrote:
> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in

> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:31:35 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
> > <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
> >> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >
> >>> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still INFESTED
> >>> with Hateful & Ignorant BIGOTS! **SHAME** on Most of the USA!!
> >
> >> So people that don't give Gays what ever they want are hateful?
> >
> > No -- but dolts who seek to DEPRIVE them of across-the-board
> > EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) are.
>
> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether unatural
> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins, man
> and wife prevail.

Could you repost that in English for us native English speakers? Thanks.

> At some point it must dawn on you that YOU are the hateful bigot of natural
> affection

Says the guy who calls people "nigger", lies about what the word means, and
opposes inter racial dating.

RT

CB

unread,

Nov 11, 2009, 6:04:45 AM11/11/09

to

"RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
news:4AFA3FCB...@hotmMOVEail.com...

> CB wrote:
>> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
>> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:31:35 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
>> > <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
>> >> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still INFESTED
>> >>> with Hateful & Ignorant BIGOTS! **SHAME** on Most of the USA!!
>> >
>> >> So people that don't give Gays what ever they want are hateful?
>> >
>> > No -- but dolts who seek to DEPRIVE them of across-the-board
>> > EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) are.
>>
>> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
>> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether
>> unatural
>> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins,
>> man
>> and wife prevail.
>
> Could you repost that in English for us native English speakers? Thanks.

You have no intelectual capacity

>
>> At some point it must dawn on you that YOU are the hateful bigot of
>> natural
>> affection
>
> Says the guy who calls people "nigger"

Specific people whose low down and ugly character has no better description

, lies about what the word means, and
> opposes inter racial dating.

Every parent does to you PC pimp.

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,

Nov 11, 2009, 9:41:47 AM11/11/09

to

On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:04:45 -0500,
"CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:

> "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>> CB wrote:
>>> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in

>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>>>> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:

>>>>>> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still INFESTED
>>>>>> with Hateful & Ignorant BIGOTS! **SHAME** on Most of the USA!!

>>>>> So people that don't give Gays what ever they want are hateful?

>>>> No -- but dolts who seek to DEPRIVE them of across-the-board
>>>> EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) are.

>>> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny
>>> of activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether
>>> unatural affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection
>>> wins, man and wife prevail.

>> Could you repost that in English for us native English speakers? Thanks.

> You have no intelectual capacity.

>>> At some point it must dawn on you that YOU are the hateful bigot of
>>> natural affection

>> Says the guy who calls people "nigger," ...

> Specific people whose low down and ugly character has no
> better description

>> ...lies about what the word means, and opposes inter racial dating.

> Every parent does to you PC pimp.

ROTFL!!! You didn't help your case one whit, "CB."

All you did just now is remind people even MORE of
what a complete FOOL you are.

AS FOR those so-called "activist judges" you WHINED about:

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

President Obama is Gradually SAVING America from
a TYRANNICAL U.S. Supreme Court

A favorite refrain from the RRR Cult's leaders, and its lemmings who
parrot them, is that "unelected, black-robed, activist judges legislate
from the bench." So let's take a look at the ramifications of those
proclamations about our Judicial Branch of government, by the "Relig-
ious" Radical Right.

FIRST of all, consider that the only "legislating" from the bench that
ever is done is 100% legitimate. It's called "Judicial Law," and when it's
a majority decision that's an interpretation of the U.S. Constitution by
the U.S. Supreme Court, it supercedes ALL statutory law, and can be
contravened only by a later reversal by that court, or by a Constitu-
tional Amendment. So this obvious absence of a basic knowledge of
American civics on their part of the cult's lemmings (and the depth to
which its leaders will reach in order to spread its lying propaganda) is
duly noted. As well as the lemmings' typical -- and unquestioning --
obvious gullibility that's proven by their consistently falling for the
cult's lies and propaganda, hook, line and sinker!

It's called the Balance of Powers, and checks-and-balances. That's
in the Constitution. It's what keeps the three branches of government
(Executive, Legislative, and Judicial) from overreaching their power, in
each case. (Think "rock, scissors, paper.")

Congress has the power to enact statutory law, and to initiate
Constitutional Amendments. In the case of statutory law, those can
be nullified -- totally legally -- by the U.S. Supreme Court. But if the
Supreme Court appears to go too far, then the Constitution can be
amended to override its decision.

All Supreme Court Justices are "activists" or they wouldn't be there.
Including the socially-conservative ones. The only reason that the RRR
Cult whines about that is because their activists happen to be in the
minority.

Oh. And their "activist" judges (whom they refer to as "construc-
tionists" -- thus, a dishonest attempt to make a distinction with regard
to "activism") also happen to be "unelected." No surprise, since that's
what the Constitution specifies: that Supreme Court Justices will be
presidentially appointed, subject to confirmation by Congress. (And
thus, not elected by the people.)

What hypocrisy, and what stupidity, on the part of the "Religious"
Radical Right. Americans can thank God, their lucky stars, or what-
ever else anyone may happen to believe in, that the Supreme Court's
majority still is comprised of social liberals who stand up for the per-
sonal liberties and rights of the people.

If McCain had won the election last year, American society very likely
would quickly and inexorably have begun to devolve into one that could
make the former Soviet Union look tame. There IS a "slippery slope," but
it doesn't lead toward expanded liberties, as hyperconservatives seem
to fear. It leads precisely in the opposite direction, once the catalyst
has been triggered. That is not an overstatement. Our personal liberties
and rights have been defended for all of our lives by a Supreme Court
having an egalitarian majority. And that's hanging by a very fragile
thread right now, since many of its recent decisions have supported
liberty by only a 5-4 majority. Hal Lindsey pointed out in 2004 that it
would be almost certain that at least two of the Court's Justices would
l not be able to hang on for another 4 years if Bush were elected. The
Court had at that point gone longer without any turnover than it had
at anytime in the nation's history.

As we know now, in 2009, Bush DID get re-elected in '04, and he
DID poison the Court with two Neocons. But we've been VERY lucky,
because President Obama has since appointed Justice Sotomayor,
another YOUNG social liberal, to the Court, to replace a retiring OLDER
social liberal. But that's just barely a holding action. What is REALLY
needed now is to replace at least one, and hopefully two, of the
Court's REPRESSIVE justices with socially-liberal ones -- to guarantee
the safety of our personal liberties for several decades to come.

Suppose that the majority had voted the OTHER way, just in THESE
decisions, over the last 50 years:

1954 -- The beginning of the end of segregation would not have been
initiated by the Court's "Brown vs. Board of Education" decision.

1967 -- Many states' hateful bans on interracial marriage would have
survived, and might still be in force today. The Court's "Loving vs.
Virginia" decision ended that discrimination.

1973 -- Tens of millions of women who were enabled by a beneficent
Supreme Court to put their lives back on track by having access to safe
and legal abortion would instead have been forced to gestate unwanted
reproductive-process entities to term against their will, or seek dangerous
or exorbitant illegal abortions, or travel to a free state for one. The
latter would exclude millions of lower-economic-level women, and it
would impose unconscionable second-class-citizen status upon all Amer-
ican women. We know even today, [35] years later, that many states
would still choose to repress or prohibit this vital human right, if they
could. The Court's "Roe vs. Wade" decision emancipated ALL of Amer-
ica's girls and women!

1997 -- Without our sensible and benevolent Court, on June 26th, the
repressive, so-called "Communication Decency Act" (CDA) which would
have severely impacted freedom of speech, and imposed censorship
upon the Internet, would have survived.

2003 -- The government would not have so very sensibly been kicked
OUT of the bedrooms of American citizens. ("Lawrence vs. Texas")

And those are just some of the key cases. A repressive Court ob-
viously would have disregarded our rights just as consistently in many
lesser cases, as well.

If that weren't bad enough, consider this: The liberty-defending courts
(U.S. Supreme Court included, but don't forget such ones on the state level
as Massachusetts' Supreme Judicial Court, which sensibly recognized that
there is no valid or Constitutional reason to deny marriage to same-sex
couples), can directly stand up for our rights and nullify attempts to
repress them. But -- there's far more to this than that. There's the
psychological impact upon legislators as they write their proposed laws,
who currently (and sensibly) keep a gimlet eye on the courts that could
(and usually still would, in today's America) strike them down in a
heartbeat if they didn't work hard to ensure that their legislation doesn't
trample on any of our liberties.

The passage of the ban on the SECOND-trimester ID&E abortion pro-
cedure (lyingly called "partial-birth" by its dishonest proponents) was an
exception to that. The Republican majority in both houses of Congress
were under intense pressure by the Neocon (RRR Cult) constituents that
they perceive as being their base, to pass the measure -- again without the
exception for the health of the woman that the Supreme Court has indicated
would have made the act viable. So it's already been invalidated by three
federal judges, and when it gets to the Supreme Court, it almost surely
will be struck down, just as Nebraska's similar law was -- for the same
reason. Or we can HOPE so. After Bush's POISONING of the Court, the
situation is iffy!

But most of the time, state legislatures and Congress don't swim so
obviously against the current -- because they already know ahead of time
that an egalitarian-majority Supreme Court stands in the wings, ready and
able to scour the Constitution with a fine-tooth comb with the clear
intention of doing whatever they legitimately can to defend our personal
liberties whenever possible. (But again, GW Bush endangered that. We
NEED to replace Neocon justices with socially-RESPONSIBLE one who
value our personal liberties, and will continue to safeguard them.

So -- WHAT IF -- the Supreme Court no longer were of that mind?

THEN what would the state legislatures and Congress -- so many of
which now are controlled by Neocon Republicans who harbor open and
blatant disdain for so many of our rights -- DO?

THINK about that!

By electing Obama, we've stepped back somewhat from the ABYSS.
Possibly in time to save America from such an awful and unthinkable
cataclysm. Remember -- Supreme Court appointments are for life! And
if that Court had become irrevocably repressive, very few (if any)
Americans alive today would ever again have known a Supreme Court
that consistently and fairly defended their rights. If there EVER were a
time not to take freedom for granted, THIS is that time. More so by far
than at any other time in any of our lifetimes. Exponentially more so.

This IS the most critically-important election in our lifetimes.

Let us pray that Obama SOON can replace at least one, and hopefully
two, repressive justices with LIBERTY-defending ones!

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

CB

unread,

Nov 11, 2009, 8:30:01 PM11/11/09

to

"(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in

message news:n8jlf5hvj55cc5vch...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:04:45 -0500,
> "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>> "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>>> CB wrote:
>>>> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>>>>> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>
>

...
After living under Nazi and Communist occupation in Poland, the Pope knew
the dangers of a government that grows too powerful, too intrusive and too
hostile to the religious and moral values of its citizens.
...
http://www.colleen-campbell.com/Misc_Columns/022705OSVJudges.htm

>
> Let us pray that Obama SOON can replace at least one, and hopefully
> two, repressive justices with LIBERTY-defending ones!
>

I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.

God knows his actions haven't inspired anyone or our pursuit of (Capitalism)
happiness...except the Japanese auto industry and the quick fix of tax payer
bailouts for the union boss.

CB
I heard that Conservative books rock the NY Times Best Seller List most
every week now and the NY Times is considering making a separate list just
for Conservatives. You know the Pinchy is frightened when contemplating
'leveling the playing field' so Liberal books have a (fraudulent) chance.

Glenn Beck and Mark Levin's books out sell all others 2:1.

How America has turned from the most representative form of government to
rule by an oligarchy of judges
Men in Black
by Mark R. Levin
From same-sex marriage, illegal immigration, and economic socialism to
partial birth abortion, political speech, and terrorists' "rights," judges
have abused their constitutional mandate by imposing their personal
prejudices and beliefs on the rest of society. No radical political movement
has been more effective in undermining our system of government than the
judiciary. And we, the people, need not stand for it.

I fear the next election (Nov 2010) will totally stomp out the Dim Lib Party
so that Conservative majority throws America's helm about 180�, projecting
America's moral authority in the world as hostile to the enemies of the
West/Christian/Jewish. By 2012 Obama, the man-child will have been impeached
because of incompetence. In the confusion Syria, Iran, Venezuela, The Bear
from the North and the OPEC cartel will attempt to strangle America's reborn
strength (revised Roman Empire) and put the move on Israel. That's when
Jesus comes for His bride, the church.

CB

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 7:11:56 AM11/14/09

to

"CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote in message
news:4afb651a$0$5106$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...

>
> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
> message news:n8jlf5hvj55cc5vch...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 06:04:45 -0500,
>> "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>>> "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>>>> CB wrote:
>>>>> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
>>>>>> Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>>>>>>> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>
> ...
> After living under Nazi and Communist occupation in Poland, the Pope knew
> the dangers of a government that grows too powerful, too intrusive and too
> hostile to the religious and moral values of its citizens.
> ...
> http://www.colleen-campbell.com/Misc_Columns/022705OSVJudges.htm

Wasn't Hitler into S&M?

Message has been deleted

Clairbear

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 3:17:10 PM11/14/09

to

smo...@board.com wrote in news:ts2uf5pgj8guet6tq...@4ax.com:

> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
>>reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
>>President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.
>

> Then you're Praying for the bad guys, Barta
>
> it was NOT liberals in the Nazi regime or the Communist
> regimes that caused the problem
>
> YOUR kind of politician did
>
> Same as in the old south
>
> CONSERVATIVES were racists, homphobes, bigots and
> lynched blacks
>
Racist, bigots and lynchers like former KKK grand dragon, Robert Byrd(D-
WV)?
Got news for he is not a conservative. Hate cuts across party lines and
political divides.
"None are so blind, as those who cannot see" Enjoy your darkness

Beam Me Up Scotty

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 3:28:42 PM11/14/09

to

smo...@board.com wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>

>> I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
>> reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
>> President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.
>

> Then you're Praying for the bad guys, Barta
>
> it was NOT liberals in the Nazi regime or the Communist
> regimes that caused the problem

They were the catalyst to give up individual rights that make Nazi and
Communist able to take power.

Message has been deleted

CB

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 9:48:09 PM11/14/09

to

<smo...@board.com> wrote in message
news:e7euf555mvb2mfr2d...@4ax.com...

> Liberals and Progressives set up our "Foundation" you
> nutjob

Many question whether our Founders really were Christians. Here are some
facts about the signers of the Declaration of Independence. (See also the
post from 10/25 about signers of the Constitution.)

a.. Adams, John - Congregationalist and later a Unitarian (he did not
accept the Trinity). He said, "To enable me to maintain this declaration I
rely, under God, with entire confidence on the firm and enlightened support
of the national legislature and upon the virtue and patriotism of my fellow
citizens." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

b.. Adams, Samuel - Congregationalist. "We have this day restored the
Sovereign to Whom all men ought to be obedient. He reigns in heaven and from
the rising to the setting of the sun, let His kingdom come." Also: "The
rights of the colonists as Christians...may be best understood by reading
and carefully studying the institutes of the Great Law Giver and Head of the
Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in
the New Testament." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

c.. Bartlett, Josiah - Bartlett was a Congregationalist. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

d.. Braxton, Carter - Braxton was a member of the Episcopal church.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

e.. Carroll, Charles - Roman Catholic. Carroll said, "Without morals a
republic cannot subsist any length of time; they therefore who are decrying
the Christian religion, whose morality is so sublime and pure...are
undermining the solid foundation of morals, the best security for the
duration of free governments." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

f.. Chase, Samuel - Chase was an Episcopalian. As a Supreme Court Justince
he said, "Religion is of general and public concern, and on its support
depend, in great measure, the peace and good order of government, the safety
and happiness of the people. By our form of government, the Christian
religion is the established religion; and all sects and denominations of
Christians are placed upon the same equal footing, and are equally entitled
to protection in their religious liberty." (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

g.. Clark, Abraham - Clark was a Presbyterian, and said once, ""Nothing
short of the Almighty Power of God can Save us-it is not in our Numbers, our
Union, or our Valour that I dare trust." (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

h.. Clymer, George - Was both a Quaker and an Episcopalian (Signer of
Declaration of Independence, Delegate to Constitutional Convention, Signer
of Constitution)

i.. Ellery, William - Ellery was known as a Congregationalist and a devout
Christian. From Lossing's "Signers of the Declaration of Independence" we
hear, "As a patriot and a Christian, his name will ever be revered." (Signer
of Declaration of Independence)

j.. Floyd, William - Floyd was a Presbyterian. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

k.. Gerry, Elbridge - Gerry was an Episcopalian. Promoted Massachusetts'
Religious Freedoms Act. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

l.. Gwinnett, Button - Gwinnett was an Episcopalian and a
Congregationalist. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

m.. Hall, Lyman - Hall was a Congregationalist and served as a minister in
Connecticut. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

n.. Hancock, John - Hancock was a Congregationalist. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

o.. Harrison, Benjamin - Harrison was a member of the Episcopal church. He
professed that religion was necessary to society and that government should
support it. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

p.. Hart, John - Hart was a Presbyterian. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

q.. Hewes, Joseph - Hewes was a Quaker and an Episcopalian. He was the son
of a pious and well-to-do Quaker farmer and received a strict religious
upbringing. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

r.. Heyward, Thomas - Heyward was a member of the Episcopal church.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

s.. Hooper, William - Hooper was an Episcopalian. He was trained at
Harvard as a minister. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

t.. Hopkins, Stephen - He was a Quaker with an active interest in the
church. He believed in the divinity of the Christian religion. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

u.. Hopkinson, Francis - Hopkinson was an Episcopalian. He became a Church
music director and edited a hymnal that set all of 150 psalms to music.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

v.. Huntington, Samuel - He was a Congregationalist. According to B. J.
Lossing's "Signers of the Declaration of Independence," it is known that
"Governor Huntington lived the life of the irreproachable and sincere
Christian... as a devoted Christian and a true patriot, he never swerved
from duty..." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

w.. Jefferson, Thomas - Jefferson was probably best called a Deist, but he
is also claimed by Unitarians and some Christian denominations. He was the
one who penned the idea that our rights come from God ("Creator") (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

x.. Lee, Francis Lightfoot - Lee was an Anglican and a devout Christian.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

y.. Lee, Richard Henry - Lee was an Anglican and known as a sincere
Christian. He professed that religion was necessary to society and that
government should support it. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

z.. Lewis, Francis - Lewis was an Episcopalian. His father was an
Episcopal clergyman, his mother was a clergyman's daughter. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

aa.. Livingston, Philip - Livingston was a Presbyterian and belonged to an
eminent Christian family. He followed the Christian religion. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

ab.. Lynch, Thomas - Member of the Episcopal Church (Signer of Declaration
of Independence)

ac.. Madison, James - Member of the Episcopal Church. He said, "The belief
in a God, all powerful, wise, and good, [is] essential to the moral order of
the world, and to the happiness of man." (Signer of Declaration of
Independence, Delegate to Constitutional Convention, Signer of Constitution)

ad.. McKean, Thomas - McKean was a member of the Presbyterian Church.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

ae.. Middleton, Arthur - Member of the Episcopal Church (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

af.. Morris, Lewis - Morris was an Episcopalian. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

ag.. Morris, Robert - Member of the Episcopal Church (Signer of
Declaration of Independence, Delegate to Constitutional Convention, Signer
of Constitution)

ah.. Morton, John - Member of the Episcopal Church. In his will he said,
"...for the settling of such temporal estate as it hath pleased God to bless
me with in this life..." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

ai.. Nelson, Thomas Jr. - Nelson was a member of the Episcopal church.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

aj.. Paca, William - Paca was an Episcopalian and a consistent Christian.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

ak.. Paine, Robert - Paine left Calvinism to become a Unitarian. He served
as a military chaplain. He said, "I am constrained to express my adoration
of . . . the Author of my existence . . . [for] His forgiving mercy revealed
to the world through Jesus Christ, through whom I hope for never ending
happiness in a future state." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

al.. Penn, John - Penn was a member of the Episcopalian church. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

am.. Read, George - Read was an Episcopalian. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence, Signer of Constitution)

an.. Rodney, Caesar - Rodney was an Episcopalian. (Signer of Declaration
of Independence)

ao.. Rush, Benjamin - Rush was a Presbyterian. He was founder and manager
of the Philadelphia Bible Society (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

ap.. Ross, George - Ross was an Anglican. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

aq.. Rutledge, Edwards - Rutledge was an Anglican. (Signer of Declaration
of Independence)

ar.. Smith, James - Smith was a Presbyterian. He was quite strick that
those in his presense should not speak ill of Christianity. (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

as.. Stockton, Richard - Stockton was a Presbyterian. He said, "I think it
proper here not only to subscribe to . . . doctrines of the Christian
religion . . . but also, in the bowels of a father's affection, to exhort
and charge them [my children] that the fear of God is the beginning of
wisdom, that the way of life held up in the Christian system is calculated
for the most complete happiness." (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

at.. Stone, Thomas - Stone was an Episcopalian. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

au.. Taylor, George - Taylor was a Presbyterian and the son of a
clergyman. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

av.. Thornton, Matthew - Thornton was a member of the Presbyterian Church
and known as a devout Christian. (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

aw.. Walton, George - Walton was an Episcopalian. (Signer of Declaration
of Independence)

ax.. Whipple, William - . (Signer of Declaration of Independence)

ay.. Williams, William - Williams was a Congregationalist and a devout
Christian. He studied for the ministry. (Signer of Declaration of
Independence)

az.. Witherspoon, John - Witherspoon was a Presbyterian. He said, "[S]hun,
as a contagious pestilence,... those especially whom you perceive to be
infected with the principles of infidelity or [who are] enemies to the power
of religion" (Signer of Declaration of Independence, Signer of Constitution)

ba.. Wolcott, Oliver - He was a Congregationalist and a devout Christian.
(Signer of Declaration of Independence)

bb.. Wythe, George - Wythe was a member of the Episcopal church. He helped
draft instructions for an embassy in Canada, which said, "You are further to
declare that we hold sacred the rights of conscience, and may promise to the
whole people, solemnly in our name, the free and undisturbed exercise of
their religion. And...that all civil rights and the right to hold office
were to be extended to persons of any Christian denomination." (Signer of
Declaration of Independence)

--
CB
"Larry Hewitt" <larr...@comporium.net> wrote in message
news:c4KdnaAUA8F...@comporium.net...
> There is no god.
You remind me of the character in "30 Days of Night" when the vampire
says...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUr0IwxCJMk
Watch for it 55 sec. in

CB

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 9:57:50 PM11/14/09

to

<smo...@board.com> wrote in message
news:ap2uf51cegberlf3g...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"

> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>...
>>After living under Nazi and Communist occupation in Poland, the Pope knew
>>the dangers of a government that grows too powerful, too intrusive and too
>>hostile to the religious and moral values of its citizens.
>

> Rightwing, militaristic, ultranationalistic,
> anti-alien, anti-immigrant, self-serving greedy people
> were in control, Barta
>
> Liberals (like the Pope) were the victims
>
> YOUR ideology ALWAYS commits mass murder
>

You're so messed up on what's right and wrong you deny history and the
friggin name of the Party that Hitler came to power on. It was the German
Socialist Workers Party. Just like Obama and his union thug SEIU/ACORN.

Hitler was also a homo, like you

Clairbear

unread,

Nov 14, 2009, 10:05:24 PM11/14/09

to

smo...@board.com wrote in
news:e7euf555mvb2mfr2d...@4ax.com:

> Liberals and Progressives set up our "Foundation" you
> nutjob
>

> Conservatives sided with the crown----wanting "no
> change" or "conserving the status quo"
>
> Conservatives in the south fought to preserve the
> "status quo" and the "right" of state to make laws
> okaying slavery, Jim Crow and forcing religous quackery
> on citizens.
>
> It was the the common behavior of Conservatives in
> Germany who fought to maintain the "stature" of the
> former German Empires---just like the conservatives in
> the south did to maintain that corrupt antebellum
> social order
>
> It is conservatism that championed fights against ALL
> change
>
The liberal elite double talk has addled you tiny lttle mind
I won't accuse you of lying as you obviously lack the abilty to tell lie
from truth or right from wrong. All you see is your hate filled delusion

Message has been deleted

Pandeism Fish

unread,

Nov 15, 2009, 12:55:13 AM11/15/09

to

On Nov 14, 9:48 pm, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
> <smor...@board.com> wrote in message

>
> news:e7euf555mvb2mfr2d...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:28:42 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty

> > <Then-Destroy-Everyth...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:

> w.. Jefferson, Thomas - Jefferson was probably best called aDeist, but he

> ...
>
> read more »

So? These were people who believed that illnesses were caused by
demons with names like Boogajoojoo entering the body, and would have
thought pasteurization and sterilization to be kinds of witchcraft....
they had no exposure whatsoever to the logic of pandeism....

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 15, 2009, 4:02:13 PM11/15/09

to

smo...@board.com wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>

> >I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
> >reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
> >President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.
>

> Then you're Praying for the bad guys, Barta

CB is unAmerican.

> it was NOT liberals in the Nazi regime or the Communist
> regimes that caused the problem
>

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 15, 2009, 4:05:28 PM11/15/09

to

Clairbear wrote:
> smo...@board.com wrote in news:ts2uf5pgj8guet6tq...@4ax.com:

> > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"
> > <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
> >

> >>I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
> >>reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
> >>President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.
> >

> > Then you're Praying for the bad guys, Barta
> >

> > it was NOT liberals in the Nazi regime or the Communist
> > regimes that caused the problem
> >
> > YOUR kind of politician did
> >
> > Same as in the old south
> >
> > CONSERVATIVES were racists, homphobes, bigots and
> > lynched blacks
> >

> Racist, bigots and lynchers like former KKK grand dragon, Robert Byrd(D-
> WV)?
> Got news for he is not a conservative. Hate cuts across party lines and
> political divides.
> "None are so blind, as those who cannot see" Enjoy your darkness

List all the black republicons now in Congress ->

List all the black republicon Presidents ->

https://www.entrepreneur.com/tradejournals/article/11886935.html
...
In early March 1989, after his legislative victory, Duke
addressed a Populist party convention in Chicago, telling
the audience of neo-Nazis, white supremacists, and skinheads
that he had run for office under the GOP label "because that's
where so many of our people are," adding, "I am a Republican,
but I am and always will be a Populist Republican!" Unbeknownst
to Duke, an opponent tape-recorded his remarks and later offered
the story to the Picayune.
...

Enjoy your darkness, Carebear.

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 15, 2009, 4:05:54 PM11/15/09

to

Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:
>

Oh? Cite ->

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 15, 2009, 5:57:08 PM11/15/09

to

CB wrote:
> "RichTravsky" <traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message

> > CB wrote:
> >> "(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> " <x...@m.com> wrote in
> >> > On Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:31:35 -0500, Beam Me Up Scotty
> >> > <Then-Destro...@Talk-n-dog.com> wrote:
> >> >> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> MAINE Reminds the WORLD that the USA is still INFESTED
> >> >>> with Hateful & Ignorant BIGOTS! **SHAME** on Most of the USA!!
> >> >
> >> >> So people that don't give Gays what ever they want are hateful?
> >> >
> >> > No -- but dolts who seek to DEPRIVE them of across-the-board
> >> > EQUAL rights (including marriage equality) are.
> >>
> >> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
> >> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether
> >> unatural
> >> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins,
> >> man
> >> and wife prevail.
> >
> > Could you repost that in English for us native English speakers? Thanks.
>
> You have no intelectual capacity

That's "intellectual", you dumb hick. Learn English.

> >> At some point it must dawn on you that YOU are the hateful bigot of
> >> natural
> >> affection
> >
> > Says the guy who calls people "nigger"
>
> Specific people whose low down and ugly character has no better description

CB lies again.

> , lies about what the word means, and
> > opposes inter racial dating.
>
> Every parent does to you PC pimp.

Only bigoted parents. Like you had.

RT

Message has been deleted

juanjo

unread,

Nov 17, 2009, 12:49:37 AM11/17/09

to

On Nov 8, 9:40 am, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:

> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether unatural
> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins, man
> and wife prevail.
>

Well we do not run on the principle of a dictatorship of the
majority. That is the Marxist-Leninist concept you seem to be
advocating. Our founding fathers were dead set against mob rule. And
we all know what happens when you get mob rule - look what happened to
the French after they overthrew their king.

As for gays only getting what they want out of "activist" judge. that
old canard is tired at best. One man's activist judge is another
man's defender of the constitution. But in either case, the judiciary
is an important part of the balance of power in this country. It is
their job to bitch slap bigots like you. First of all state
legislatures have passed legislation concerning protecting the rights
of gay citizens to participate without discrimination from bigots like
yourself. Voters in a number of states have refused to support a
number of bigoted attempts to roll back those rights. Washington
State is the most recent state where this occurred. People there
voted overwhelmingly to allow same sex couples to have all the rights
as mixed sex marriage couples so long as it was not called marriage.

Clairbear

unread,

Nov 17, 2009, 1:40:09 AM11/17/09

to

juanjo <jonp...@mindspring.com> wrote in
news:77280933-a614-43e1...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com:

> On Nov 8, 9:40�am, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
>> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether
>> unatu
> ral
>> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection
>> wins, ma
> n
>> and wife prevail.
>>
>
> Well we do not run on the principle of a dictatorship of the
> majority. That is the Marxist-Leninist concept you seem to be
> advocating. Our founding fathers were dead set against mob rule. And
> we all know what happens when you get mob rule - look what happened to
> the French after they overthrew their king.

I guess you don't understand democracy In a vote the majority in this case
those who see no reason to make marriage anything other than a man and a
woman. That has been the basis of all society in human history. Whether you
see it as ordained by God or a necessity of the biological imperative one
man and one woman is the basic unit of the family. Same sex couples cannot
procreate is the true reason for marriage. I think if they want to have
some sort of partner ship where they have the rights of plife partner fine
but marriage id a man woman partnership ONLY

> As for gays only getting what they want out of "activist" judge. that
> old canard is tired at best. One man's activist judge is another
> man's defender of the constitution. But in either case, the judiciary
> is an important part of the balance of power in this country. It is
> their job to bitch slap bigots like you. First of all state
> legislatures have passed legislation concerning protecting the rights
> of gay citizens to participate without discrimination from bigots like
> yourself. Voters in a number of states have refused to support a
> number of bigoted attempts to roll back those rights. Washington
> State is the most recent state where this occurred. People there
> voted overwhelmingly to allow same sex couples to have all the rights
> as mixed sex marriage couples so long as it was not called marriage.
>

Gay already have the protection of law the same as normal men and women.
They do need special rights, just because they choose to defy the natural
order.

CB

unread,

Nov 17, 2009, 6:03:47 AM11/17/09

to

"juanjo" <jonp...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:77280933-a614-43e1...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 8, 9:40 am, "CB" <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:

> The only way Homos have got what they want is through the tyranny of
> activist judges. When ever 'we the people' are able to vote whether
> unatural
> affection is given Relative Moral Equivelance, natural affection wins, man
> and wife prevail.
>

Well we do not run on the principle of a dictatorship of the
majority. That is the Marxist-Leninist concept you seem to be
advocating.

When it comes to moral issues, you're fucking right!

CB

unread,

Nov 17, 2009, 6:07:48 AM11/17/09

to

"juanjo" <jonp...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:77280933-a614-43e1...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

Heh...most everyone believes homos should habs duh rights of duh shacked up.

If you 'feel' Washington that's a moral accomplishment, kudoz

Message has been deleted

Topaz

unread,

Nov 17, 2009, 4:45:26 PM11/17/09

to

This web site explains what is going on with the "left" and the
"right" in the modern economic sense.
http://www.michaeljournal.org/myth.htm

The meaning of "right" and "left" has changed. I stay with the
original meaning for the same reason I refuse to call homosexual
perverts "gay". The word "gay" was originally a good thing.

The right is for outlawing homosexual perversion,
prostitution, abortions, heroin, and other bad things. It puts the
good of the nation first and ahead of the freedom of individuals to
corrupt the culture of the nation.

Leftists believe in the Rede of Witchcraft which states-- If it
harm none, do what will you will. This sounds nice, but like the apple
that the witch gave to Snow White it has poison within. The Rede of
Witchcraft is the Bible of liberalism. It would legalize homosexual
perversion, prostitution, drugs, etc.

The right is for building a great nation. Leftists care only
about individual freedom and are opposed to any laws that would make
the nation better. There are beaches where normal families will not go
because homosexual perverts practice their perversion on the beach.
When the liberals say they are for freedom this is kind of thing they
are talking about. Of course people should be free to do what they
want most of the time. There is no argument there. Liberals are
talking about being free to do things that many people object to and
want outlawed. Their philosophy, taken to its logical conclusion,
would not allow the law that says drivers have to stop at the red
lights. Their philosophy would allow heroin to be sold on grocery
store shelves and allow ads promoting heroin on TV. Their philosophy
would result in chaos and degeneracy.

Libertarians are liberals who want freedom for the Ebenezer
Scrooges to be as greedy as they want. They have the same philosophy
as other leftist who want to legalize heroin and prostitution, namely
that the state can't tell them what they can't do. People don't like
laws stopping them from doing things, and we should sympathize with
that, but sometimes that is not the most important thing. Capitalists
want freedom for greed, other liberals want freedom for degeneracy,
but good laws would make a nation good.

The Communists were leftist and they said they were fighting for
freedom. In Spain they sided with the anarchists. The Communists and
the anarchists were the same people or the same type of people. The
Communists were for having government but only temporarily. They said
that their government was necessary only until the whole world was
Communist. After the world was Communist they wanted to dissolve the
government and have an anarchy.

The right wing cares about the future. Leftists only care about the
present. If their philosophy results in a nightmare future like in
Soylent Green or some other futuristic nightmare they are not
interested and insist that nothing could be more important than the
freedom of individuals to be as decadent as they want. To see the kind
of society
libertarians are fighting for see the movie "8MM", they aren't for the
snuff part, but
other than that it shows liberalism in action.

http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/

http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org

http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/

CB

unread,

Nov 18, 2009, 6:37:51 PM11/18/09

to

<smo...@board.com> wrote in message
news:l495g5h6if5qa117h...@4ax.com...

> On Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:07:48 -0500, "CB"
> <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
>
>>Heh...most everyone believes homos should habs duh rights of duh shacked
>>up.
>

> Racist sleaze

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 19, 2009, 3:22:10 PM11/19/09

to

Still waiting.

RichTravsky

unread,

Nov 19, 2009, 3:23:00 PM11/19/09

to

RichTravsky wrote:
>
> Clairbear wrote:
> > smo...@board.com wrote in news:ts2uf5pgj8guet6tq...@4ax.com:

> > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:30:01 -0500, "CB"
> > > <C...@PrayForMe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >>I pray that Conservatism continues momentum so that Liberals up for
> > >>reelection are kicked out on their collective ass. I also pray for the
> > >>President to remain safe from harm and for his policies to fail.
> > >
> > > Then you're Praying for the bad guys, Barta
> > >

> > > it was NOT liberals in the Nazi regime or the Communist
> > > regimes that caused the problem
> > >
> > > YOUR kind of politician did
> > >
> > > Same as in the old south
> > >
> > > CONSERVATIVES were racists, homphobes, bigots and
> > > lynched blacks
> > >

> > Racist, bigots and lynchers like former KKK grand dragon, Robert Byrd(D-
> > WV)?
> > Got news for he is not a conservative. Hate cuts across party lines and
> > political divides.
> > "None are so blind, as those who cannot see" Enjoy your darkness
>
> List all the black republicons now in Congress ->
>
> List all the black republicon Presidents ->

Still waiting.

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.��) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>

unread,

Nov 22, 2009, 2:46:53 PM11/22/09

to

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Stepping Back from the ABYSS of a
TYRANNICAL U.S. Supreme Court