Gay "Marriage" Vote Killed in NJ Senate
J
It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
against that too.
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/dec/09121004.html
Gay "Marriage" Vote Killed in NJ Senate
Same-sex marriage advocates switch focus to Assembly
By Peter J. Smith
TRENTON, New Jersey, December 10, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Homosexual
advocates in New Jersey snatched a same-sex "marriage" bill from the jaws of
defeat on Wednesday, cancelling Thursday's scheduled vote in the state
Senate after realizing that they lacked the votes for the measure's
successful passage.
The bill's Senate sponsors, Sens. Raymond J. Lesniak (D-NJ 20) and Loretta
Weinberg (D-NJ 37) revoked the bill from the Senate's agenda late Wednesday
night, and stated that they wanted the General Assembly to examine the bill
first before the Senate votes.
Democrats firmly control the N.J. Senate by a 23-17 margin, but a number of
Democrats count themselves as opponents of same-sex "marriage." According to
the Philadelphia Inquirer, Sen. Gerald Cardinale (R-NJ 39) said he was aware
of nine Senate Democrats who were intending to vote against the bill and
would have doomed its passage.
The maneuver allows same-sex "marriage" activists to lobby the General
Assembly heavily, where the passage of a homosexual "marriage" bill stands
to have a better chance at passing. Both Sens. Lesniak and Weinberg hope
that the Assembly Judiciary Committee will take up the measure, but that
committee is not scheduled to return to Trenton until January 7.
A delay that long is risky for same-sex "marriage" activists, as it leaves
little more than a week for both state houses to schedule votes before
Democratic Gov. Jon Corzine leaves office on January 19. Corzine has
promised to sign the bill, while his replacement, Gov.-elect Chris Christie,
has promised a veto.
Despite having more potential backers in the Assembly, Democrats show little
enthusiasm for acting on the measure.
--
J Young
Jvis...@live.com
W.T.S.
news:3brrvo....@news.alt.net...
> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest
> for marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy
> with civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to
> vote against that too.
> http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/dec/09121004.html
have to surrender to those rights, just as the "Old South" did to civil
rights.
Bible, bad. Sex, good.
--
http://folding.stanford.edu
Save lives, visit today!
Syd M.
> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
> against that too.
>
Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
this for the civil rights issue that it is.
And you homophobes are losing.
PDW
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>"
> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
> against that too.
> Democrats firmly control the N.J. Senate by a 23-17 margin, but a number of
> Democrats count themselves as opponents of same-sex "marriage." According to
> the Philadelphia Inquirer, Sen. Gerald Cardinale (R-NJ 39) said he was aware
> of nine Senate Democrats who were intending to vote against the bill and
> would have doomed its passage.
===
Those damn bigots. Nothing could be more important than legalizing gay
marriage. The next thing you know, those bigots will make it illegal
for left-handed people to get married or for niggers to marry.
Those Democrats and Republicans are all bigots. We need a new
egalitarian party, the HOMO party, that puts gay marriage above such
minor nonsense as national defense, balancing the budget, creating jobs,
and congressional junkets.
default
On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 23:33:26 -0500, "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote:
>Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>against that too.
Absolutely - democracy, right to vote, labor unions, women's suffrage,
abolition of slavery, freedom of speech, etc.. It's a slippery slope
if you ask me.
--
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>"
Slippery slope? Just slip it in your buddy's ass hole if that is what
you like, or do you prefer sucking dicks?
As a left-handed nigger queer, I hate bigots so much I give them OCR
points and RRR/RRC points.
SMITH29
Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
anything.
You are irresponsible towards sex and healthcare and just figure we
should give you what you want and pay your bills too.
Civil Rights? What about OUR civil rights?
Try this for size:
1. Pay for your own healthcare expenses.
2. Stop the spread of the AIDS virus.
http://www.kff.org/hivaids/upload/7172_04.pdf
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/resources/factsheets/us.htm
29
SMITH29
Pink Freud
"SMITH29" <smi...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:E4CdnaLmP8jnd77W...@supernews.com...
> Syd M. wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest
>>> for
>>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy
>>> with
>>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>>> against that too.
>>>
>>
>> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>> And you homophobes are losing.
>>
>> PDW
> xxxx
> Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
> anything.
Homosexual people are 'normal' too, moron.
So that's a lie in your first sentence.
dilecticon
For lesser values of the bell-shaped curve...
> So that's a lie in your first sentence.
Touchy, touchy!
Ray Fischer
>Syd M. wrote:
>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
>>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>>> against that too.
>>>
>> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>> And you homophobes are losing.
>>
>Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
>anything.
You're not normal. You're twisted by your hate and your fear.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>"
> "J" <Jvis...@live.com> wrote in message
> news:3brrvo....@news.alt.net...
>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest
>> for marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy
>> with civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to
>> vote against that too.
>> http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2009/dec/09121004.html
> Civil rights are civil rights. In time, your world and way of life will
> have to surrender to those rights,
There are civil rights and civil wrongs. Is sucking dicks a civil right
or a civil wrong? Is screwing a six-month old baby a civil right or a
civil wrong? Some forms of sex are perverted and should not be condoned
by calling it a marriage. Should you be allowed to marry your horse or
your dog?
Your dog may be your best friend, but should society allow you to marry
it? Maybe it would be OK if he was a queer dog.
Syd M.
> Syd M. wrote:
> > On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> >> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
> >> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
> >> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
> >> against that too.
>
> > Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
> > this for the civil rights issue that it is.
> > And you homophobes are losing.
>
> > PDW
>
> xxxx
> Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
> anything.
What you homophobe have is a difficult time with reality.
> You are irresponsible
No.
What about OUR civil rights?
>
YOUR civil rights shouldn't infringe on theirs, asshole.
PDW
Yer Pal Al
If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
member then stop being one.
Pink Freud
"dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
Yes, people will get touchy when you go around spreading bigotry and hate,
moron.
Don't like it? Then don't post your shit on Usenet. Hardly fucking rocket
science, is it?
dilecticon
What part of the bell-shaped curve is that?
> Don't like it? Then don't post your shit on Usenet. Hardly fucking
> rocket science, is it?
It wasn't "my shit", you hysterical ninny.
Pink Freud
If I misunderstood the 'bell-shaped curve' comment then I apologise.
Ray Fischer
Yer Pal Al
And there goes another turd burglar Godwinizing himself because he
knows that homos already have the same rights as everyone else.
dilecticon
OK, the point being homosexuality is at the "lesser" end of the curve.
it's simply mathematically so.
Thus to those in the larger swath of the curve it appears ab_normal.
It would have to.
dilecticon
Godwins law.
Ray Fischer
The nazis included homosexuals in the Holocaust.
Just like you want to do.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
dilecticon
Twice now.
Pink Freud
You mean that there are less homosexual people than heterosexual?
Well, yes.. like there are less left-handed people than right-handed.
I don't know that left-handed folk would be described as 'abnormal' though.
dilecticon
Yup.
> Well, yes.. like there are less left-handed people than right-handed.
Yup.
> I don't know that left-handed folk would be described as 'abnormal' though.
You ever sit next to one taking notes in class?
Yer Pal Al
They are desperately seeking victimhood status - now it's a homo-
holocaust.
.
Yer Pal Al
> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>
> news:hg1apj$9au$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Pink Freud wrote:
>
> >> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
> >>news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >>> Pink Freud wrote:
>
> >>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
> >>>>news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>
Being left handed doesn't affect the health of the human species as
far as I can tell.
Pink Freud
"Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:45a58a74-9d64-414d...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
Neither does being gay. If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
protection or practise abstinence.
Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than whether
people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
dilecticon
...creepy...
dilecticon
Unless you play baseball...
Jamir Quay
Doesn't account for closet bi's...
> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
> whether people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
Do they spread infection in their "sports"?
Kirk Reynolds
"Pink Freud" <some...@here.com> wrote in message
news:32%Um.31224$ox2....@newsfe05.ams2...
Al's one of those "good loyal Americans" who minds everybody's business but
his own.
Yer Pal Al
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:45a58a74-9d64-414d...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
Of course it does. If any significant percentage of the population
were gay, say 15% (the amount of lefties there are) the civilized
nations would die off.
> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> protection or practise abstinence.
I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
community: monogamy. I could care less what monkey disease gays are
sharing with each other.
> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than whether
> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
When our enemies are doing something wrong we are better off by not
pointing it out to them.
Yer Pal Al
> "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote in message
>
> news:32%Um.31224$ox2....@newsfe05.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I'll tell you again, I don't care how many of the '49ers are gay. The
Cowboys are going to the playoffs and this January you can make
outlandish claims about how many of the Golden State Warriors you've
had relations with. Just post it to your sports groups and leave the
rest of humanity out of it.
Pink Freud
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
news:hg1utp$nvo$9...@news.eternal-september.org...
Sure it does. Condoms don't care if you are gay, straight, or bi.
>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
>> whether people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>
> Do they spread infection in their "sports"?
Irrelevant.
Kirk Reynolds
Wow! That's a lot of gay imagery there, Al.
lol
Pink Freud
I doubt that very much. The human race is breeding like rabbits, with room
to spare. Got a study, a cite, or anything for me?
>> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
>> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> community: monogamy. I could care less what monkey disease gays are
> sharing with each other.
>
Untrue. Many gays are monogamous.
>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
>> whether
>> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>
> When our enemies are doing something wrong we are better off by not
> pointing it out to them.
Homosexuals are your enemies? You're at war, now?
Kirk Reynolds
Of course he is.
Righttards are always at war with something because they can't stand living
in their own skins.
Ray Fischer
Ray Fischer
That's stupid even for a dumbshit bigot like you.
>>�If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
>> protection or practise abstinence.
>
>I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
>community: monogamy.
It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
Ray Fischer
Translation: It's okay to persecute people, call them evil, and
advocate for their extermination so long as you don't call anybody a
nazi.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Kirk Reynolds
"Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
news:4b248d36$0$1599$742e...@news.sonic.net...
> Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
> And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
Hey Al, this guy sounds like he knows you personally.
Yer Pal Al
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:b85affc9-f8c3-4184...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
Statistically, they are crazy sexually active.
> >> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
> >> whether
> >> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>
> > When our enemies are doing something wrong we are better off by not
> > pointing it out to them.
>
> Homosexuals are your enemies?
Liberals are.
> You're at war, now?
Figuratively.
Yer Pal Al
> "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote in message
>
> news:CY%Um.8663$Jo5....@newsfe24.ams2...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Yet conservatives are happier, give more of their time and money to
charity, are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
Obviously you are quite bitter. Nothing a refreshing glass of bleach
can't cure.
Syd M.
> On Dec 12, 3:42 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >On Dec 12, 12:30 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> > >> SMITH29 <smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > >> >> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
> > >> >>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
> > >> >>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
> > >> >>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
> > >> >>> against that too.
>
> > >> >> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
> > >> >> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
> > >> >> And you homophobes are losing.
>
> > >> >anything.
>
>
> > >If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
> > >member then stop being one.
>
> > And there's the nazi propaganda.
>
Oh, look... Another lying bigot.
PDW
Kirk Reynolds
Cite?
Yer Pal Al
Most of Western Europe has negative population growth. 5X more
homosexuals will exacerbate the problem.
> >> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> >> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> >I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> >community: monogamy.
>
> It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
You're talking about Bill Clinton?
> And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
You're talking about Hillary Clinton?
Syd M.
Oh, look... The typical 'morality' of the fascist right-winger.
PDW
Syd M.
Lie.
> > >> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> > >> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> > >I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> > >community: monogamy.
>
> > It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
>
> You're talking about Bill Clinton?
>
...And Newt, Rush, and a whole lot of Republicans.
> > And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
>
> You're talking about Hillary Clinton?
...Or Shawn Hanerety?
PDW
Pink Freud
I'll take that as a 'no'.
>> >> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
>> >> protection or practise abstinence.
>>
>> > I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
>> > community: monogamy. I could care less what monkey disease gays are
>> > sharing with each other.
>>
>> Untrue. Many gays are monogamous.
>
> Statistically, they are crazy sexually active.
>
And statistically, many of them are monogamous.
Kirk Reynolds
"Syd M." <pdwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9f0ab6c0-519b-450c...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
PDW
Al, like many other morons, has Godwin on the brain. Yet they all fail at
actually understanding it's meaning.
Even thought I didn't vote for Obama, I'm glad he won.
It finally showed the world how pathetically devoid of character these
neocon cretins are.
Alan Ford
> Yet conservatives are happier,
Much like the mentally challenged are.
> give more of their time and money to
> charity,
While constantly bitching and whining about paying too much taxes for
social services that could be better spent on more wars, weapons, police
and prisons. One can never have enough prisons.
> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
Yeah, right. All those fucking Bible Belt rednecks have doctorates,
don't they?
--
If you don't beat your meat
You can't have any pudding
How can you have any pudding
If you don't beat your meat?
Yer Pal Al
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:ef0dd2a1-78f0-4681...@d9g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
> give more of their time and money to
> charity,
http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htm
> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html
> Cite?
Now you are even more bitter :(
Yer Pal Al
http://www.overpopulation.org/older.html
> > > >> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> > > >> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> > > >I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> > > >community: monogamy.
>
> > > It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
>
> > You're talking about Bill Clinton?
>
> ...And Newt, Rush, and a whole lot of Republicans.
The point is he's not talking about me because I'm monogamous.
> > > And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
>
> > You're talking about Hillary Clinton?
>
> ...Or Shawn Hanerety?
The hockey player villain from "Slapshot"?
Alan Ford
>> Yet conservatives are happier,
>
> http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic526279.files/Napier%20Jost%20Why%20Are%20Conservatives%20Happier.pdf
>
>> give more of their time and money to
>> charity,
>
> http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htm
>
>> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
>
> http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html
>
>> Cite?
>
> Now you are even more bitter :(
Let's see, an exit poll from the 2008 presidential election is supposed
to serve as evidence of "conservatives being less likely to be poor or a
high school drop out". Let's humor the dumbass and follow the link,
shall we?
Mention of poverty or income level in the exit poll: none.
Claim proof level: 0
High School dropout level: 35% of the voters with no high school
completion voted for McCain and are presumably conservatives. However,
the overall percentage of voters with no high school completion is only
4% of all voters, which, combined with the following breakdown:
35% of 4% are conservatives with no high school = 1.4% overall
46% of 20% are conservatives with high school = 9.2 % overall
47% of 31% are conservatives with some college = 14.6 % overall
45% of 44% are conservatives with high school = 19.8 % overall
63% of 4% are "liberals" with no high school = 2.5% overall
52% of 20% are "liberals" with high school = 10.4 % overall
51% of 31% are "liberals" with some college = 15.8 % overall
53% of 44% are "liberals" with high school = 23.3 % overall
Added together, conservative voters with high school or more = 43.6 %
Added together, liberal voters with high school or more = 49.5 %
Taking into consideration the fact that this election was more heavily
than usual attended by blacks who are hereby assumed "liberal" even
though they tend to be social conservatives as a group (and more likely
to not finish high school than other ethnic groups), and your claims are
as dumbass as ever.
Claim proof level: 0
Yes, you're "right" as usual! LOLZ.
Mitchell Holman
>
>
>>�If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
>> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> community: monogamy.
Gays cannot be monogamous?
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) <www.LayoffRemedy.com>"
In theory, queers could be "monogamous". In practice, it is extremely
rare. Once you start sucking dicks, you just can't get enough of them.
>
>
>
Pink Freud
"Mitchell Holman" <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Xns9CE044060B6B5...@216.196.97.130...
Apparently all their campaigning for equal rites in marriage is just a
'hobby'.
The Chief Instigator
> On Dec 12, 9:34?pm, "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote:
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:45a58a74-9d64-414d...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Dec 12, 4:13 pm, "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote:
>> >> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>
>> >>news:hg1apj$9au$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>> >> > Pink Freud wrote:
>>
>> >> >> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>> >> >>news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> >> >>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> >> >>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>
>> >> >>>>>> "SMITH29" <smit...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> >> >>>>>>news:E4CdnaLmP8jnd77W...@supernews.com...
>> >> >>>>>>> Syd M. wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>>>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in
>> >> >>>>>>>>> their quest for marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet,
>> >> >>>>>>>>> call it quits and be happy with civil unions; at the rate
>> >> >>>>>>>>> they're going, the people might decide to vote against that
>> >> >>>>>>>>> too.
>>
>> >> >>>>>>>> seeing this for the civil rights issue that it is. And you
Your problem appears to be that it's not that way...and it's been observed
in other species, as a means of keeping the species from outbreeding the
food supply.
>>?If you are worried about STDs personally, then use protection or practise
>> abstinence.
>
> I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> community: monogamy. I could care less what monkey disease gays are
> sharing with each other.
We'll see, in the four states in this country that have made it part of the
law.
>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
>> whether people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>
> When our enemies are doing something wrong we are better off by not
> pointing it out to them.
...and your enemies are homosexual? Live with it. The fourth largest city
in the country elected a gay mayor yesterday, one who served a term or two
as city controller...and she'd probably irk you with her wit, when she
decided to let us know that Houston has elected the first mayor who is -
wait for it - a graduate of Rice University. Quit bitching from your frozen
tundra 2000 miles away.
--
Patrick L. "The Chief Instigator" Humphrey (pat...@io.com) Houston, Texas
www.io.com/~patrick/aeros.php (TCI's 2009-10 Houston Aeros) AA#2273
LAST GAME: Peoria 2, Houston 1 (December 11)
NEXT GAME: Sunday, December 13 vs. Rockford, 4:05
The Chief Instigator
> On Dec 12, 10:44?pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> Yer Pal Al ?<caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
Why do you expect that there will be five times more? It's not exactly a
choice. You either are or aren't. I've been heterosexual since I was born,
and maybe you should be thankful for the 1-3% who are homosexual. They're
not trying to outbreed the food supply.
>> >>?If you are worried about STDs personally, then use protection or
>> >> practise abstinence.
>>
>> >I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
>> >community: monogamy.
>>
>> It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
>
> You're talking about Bill Clinton?
>
>> And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
>
> You're talking about Hillary Clinton?
How about something radical, by your standards: how about living in this
millennium, for once?
Mitchell Holman
@newsfe26.ams2:
Massachusetts, with it's "marriage destroying" gay
marriage law, has the lowest divorce rate in the country.
Kirk Reynolds
http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i04/04001101.htm
http://elections.nytimes.com/2008/results/president/exit-polls.html
> Cite?
Clone! I asked for cites, not propaganda.
Yer Pal Al
> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:23e04f90-a05b-4e12...@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
Domestic populations in Western Europe and the US are declining. Some
of those countries only have growing populations because of
immigration. Spain has like 1.15 children per couple.
> >> >> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> >> >> protection or practise abstinence.
>
> >> > I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> >> > community: monogamy. I could care less what monkey disease gays are
> >> > sharing with each other.
>
> >> Untrue. Many gays are monogamous.
>
> > Statistically, they are crazy sexually active.
>
> And statistically, many of them are monogamous.
I'm sure you mean serial monogamy which isn't monogamy.
Jamir Quay
>
> "Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
> news:hg1utp$nvo$9...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>
>>
>
> Sure it does. Condoms don't care if you are gay, straight, or bi.
Only when used properly.
>>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
>>> whether people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>>
>> Do they spread infection in their "sports"?
>
> Irrelevant.
Unless you get one form a partner who swings both ways...
Jamir Quay
> On Dec 12, 9:54 pm, "Kirk Reynolds" <4...@pr.49er.pr.com> wrote:
>> "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote in message
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> whether
>>> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>> but
>> his own.
>
> I'll tell you again, I don't care how many of the '49ers are gay. The
> Cowboys are going to the playoffs and this January you can make
> outlandish claims about how many of the Golden State Warriors you've
> had relations with. Just post it to your sports groups and leave the
> rest of humanity out of it.
>
>
> Wow! That's a lot of gay imagery there, Al.
>
> lol
>
>
Wow, that's a tepid rejoinder, newsgroup-killer.
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
> Unless you get one form a partner who swings both ways...
Compose any intelligent sentences lately?
lol
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
Hey, Jefffy. Tell Lisa I won't be over for her weekly grease and lube.
The local Kroger is all out of Crisco.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!
Ray Fischer
Or more often liars.
> give more of their time and money to
>charity,
"Charities" like spending hundreds of millions of dollars for
cathedrals.
> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
Stealing from others is often profitable.
>Obviously you are quite bitter.
Your screeching bigotry indicates that you're projecting.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Ray Fischer
>> Yer Pal Al �<caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Being left handed doesn't affect the health of the human species as
>> >> > far as I can tell.
>>
>> >> Neither does being gay.
>>
>> >Of course it does. If any significant percentage of the population
>> >were gay, say 15% (the amount of lefties there are) the civilized
>> >nations would die off.
>>
>> That's stupid even for a dumbshit bigot like you.
>
>Most of Western Europe has negative population growth.
Just keep showing us all what a moron you are.
> 5X more
>homosexuals will exacerbate the problem.
There's no problem, nazi boy.
>> >>�If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
>> >> protection or practise abstinence.
>>
>> >I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
>> >community: monogamy.
>>
>> It's not monogamy if you're screwing the neighbor's wife.
>
>You're talking about Bill Clinton?
Nope.
>> And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
>
>You're talking about Hillary Clinton?
Wrong again nazi boy.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
anonymous
>
> "Mitchell Holman" <noe...@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:Xns9CE044060B6B5...@216.196.97.130...
> > Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in
> > news:b85affc9-f8c3-4184...@e4g2000prn.googlegroups.com:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>> If you are worried about STDs personally, then use
> >>> protection or practise abstinence.
> >>
> >> I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
> >> community: monogamy.
No one, absolutely no one has monogamy. Monogamy is not in the hands of
yourself, but your partner. I knew a dentist that had an affair with
his receptionist for 21 years and then he divorced his wife and married
his receptionist. Think of history. Presidents, priests, politicians,
relatives have had affairs. Do you know how many woman throughout
history have become pregnant through an affair and just gave birth to
the baby as if conception took place by the father. If the divorce rate
is 45 percent
and say 25 percent of all married people are less than enchanted, it
easily means that about 75 of all spouses have had affairs or sex
outside of marriage. And you know the rules is you never tell your
spouse unless you have to, for example, because of an std else the
spouse carries the anger as you carry the guilt until death do they
part.
> >
> >
> > Gays cannot be monogamous?
Lots of homosexuals are monogamous and lots are not. Some homosexuals,
men, like heterosexual men, don't see sex as only being with one person
for a lifetime. So sometimes they have open marriages, sometimes shared
and sometimes private. There are predominately heterosexual fetish
clubs where lots of couples have sex, safe sex, with lots of other
partners in full view and often participation of their spouse. These
people range from early 20s to late 70s.
> Apparently all their campaigning for equal rites in marriage is just a
> 'hobby'.
Well, in Canada the campaign for equal marriage rights has long been
over for homosexuals. Homosexual marriage is old hat. What isn't old
hat is that heterosexuals
have never had to struggle so hard as they do today. Infidelity and
divorce are the least of the heterosexuals worries. It is getting a
good education where their job prospects aren't likely going to be
outsourced. Marry a spouse that is prepared to work during the marriage
often taking jobs so that one spouse works while the other tends to the
kids which means often jobs where dayshift/nightshift are possible.
Affordable housing is a problem because cheap houses are available in
smaller communities but it is the smaller communities that lose their
hospitals, schools and government services and support first as cuts to
budgets happen globally in communities of all sizes. Affordable
vehicles are a challenge especially with half the vehicle companies are
going out of business or dropping support for certain models of
vehicles. Then there is the doubling the cost of raising offspring from
100,000 over 18 years to 200,000 to raise an
offspring for the same 18 years. It used to be that any north American
kid could almost be guaranteed to get into medical or law school or even
good primary and secondary schools like their father, but unless their
offspring has top grades, that is no longer the case because budgets
have necessitated that the universities and private schools have had to
increase student enrolment on a huge scale the increase of very wealthy
foreign students from around the globe to help finance the operation of
the universities and private schools. Day-care in Canada runs at around
50 dollars per child per day which is half the average woman's salary
per day and per month she has two offspring. Often these day-care
workers are foreign speaking and that is one reason they are not in a
higher paying workforce because of their language skills. Add this to
the fact that your child's vocabulary could be limited based on limited
intellectual exposure both in the schools and in the day-care home.
Now, in terms of homosexuals, they usually have good educations, both
work, no children unless they are wealthy, so the circumstances are
entirely different. Wages have stagnated for the last 20 years but
cost of living has gone through the roof globally. This has affected
everyone globally but less so for homosexuals because they are used to
adapting to circumstances culturally since birth whereas heterosexuals
pretty well live a standard of living that has existed for a very long
time and only recently has it been eroded or declined for the average
heterosexual middle class individual.
As far as the homosexuals getting the right of marriage in countries
that don't have it yet, it will happen in the next 10 or 20 years. The
main reason it will happen is that
heterosexual society will learn that the lives of homosexuals and
heterosexuals are different and the burdens of heterosexuals will never
improve while they spend their time and money fighting against the
rights of homosexuals. It financially just isn't worthy the
investment. Just think if the Canadian churches had lobbied for more
protection of the family in terms of day-care benefits and job security
and re-education options from jobs that were outsourced instead of
spending those millions and billions fighting the homosexual's right to
equal rights. Heterosexual society thought that homos were their enemy
and it turned out it was big business wanting to make even more money
keeping the middle class from getting good returns on their savings,
keeping their wages low, destroying their pension options and removing
their medical benefits. Now, 20 years later the world see the results.
Jamir Quay
> "Pink Freud" <some...@here.com> wrote in message
> news:CY%Um.8663$Jo5....@newsfe24.ams2...
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> far as I can tell.
>>>> Neither does being gay.
>>> Of course it does. If any significant percentage of the population
>>> were gay, say 15% (the amount of lefties there are) the civilized
>>> nations would die off.
>>>
>> to spare. Got a study, a cite, or anything for me?
>>
>>>> protection or practise abstinence.
>>> I've got something infinitely better which doesn't exist in the gay
>>> sharing with each other.
>>>
>> Untrue. Many gays are monogamous.
>>
>>>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than
>>>> whether
>>>> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>>> When our enemies are doing something wrong we are better off by not
>>> pointing it out to them.
>> Homosexuals are your enemies? You're at war, now?
>
> Of course he is.
>
> Righttards are always at war with something because they can't stand living
> in their own skins.
>
>
Hahaha! It took me a couple of years but I did it! I trashed your newsgroup.
Filled it with spam. Drove away the old timers. Brought chaos to stupidity!
I did it!
I win!
You lose!
Cowgirls SUCK!
Pwned!
Go Niners!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From: Kirk Reynolds
Newsgroups: alt.sports.football.pro.dallas-cowboys
11/24/2009 10:35 PM
Messg. ID: <heifmr$669$1...@news.eternal-september.org>
Jamir Quay
> "Ray Fischer" <rfis...@sonic.net> wrote in message
> news:4b248d36$0$1599$742e...@news.sonic.net...
>> Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> And neither is it monogamy if your hand is your only partner.
>
Jamir Quay
Jamir Quay
Jamir Quay
> Clone! I asked for cites, not propaganda.
>
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
This is all you have left in your mighty arsenal, Jeffy?
lol
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
Look folks, Jeffy is frothing!
lol
Jamir Quay
Jamir Quay
dilecticon
> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>> news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>
The bell-shaped curve isn't smaller at either end?
Really?
dilecticon
>>> Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 3:42 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>> Yer Pal Al <caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Dec 12, 12:30 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>>>> SMITH29 <smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
>>>>>>>>>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>>>>>>>>>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>>>>>>>>>> against that too.
>>>>>>>>> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>>>>>>>>> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>>>>>>>>> And you homophobes are losing.
>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>> If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
>>>>>> member then stop being one.
>>>>> And there's the nazi propaganda.
>>>> And there goes another turd burglar Godwinizing himself because he
>>> The nazis
>> Twice now.
>
> And how many homosexuals do YOU want to execute, bigot?
>
None, nutcase.
dilecticon
> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Dec 12, 12:30 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>>>> SMITH29 <smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Syd M. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
>>>>>>>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>>>>>>>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>>>>>>>> against that too.
>>>>>>> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>>>>>>> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>>>>>>> And you homophobes are losing.
>>>>>> Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
>>>>>> anything.
>>>>> You're not normal. You're twisted by your hate and your fear.
>>>> If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
>>>> member then stop being one.
>>> And there's the nazi propaganda.
>>>
>
> Translation:
None needed, nutcase.
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
You're right, Jeffy.
It's prolly not your real name. Or your house there on Spanish Trail. No
fucking way that a unemployed social security collecting dish washer boy
like you end up in a house like that!
lol
Kirk Reynolds
"Jamir Quay" <s...@00.ter> wrote in message
Ray Fischer
Were you "confused" when you wrote that there is only one "lesser" end?
Maybe if you didn't depend so much upon your ignorant prejudices you
wouldn't write stupid things.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
Jamir Quay
Jamir Quay
dilecticon
> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>
>>>> OK, the point being homosexuality is at the "lesser" end of the curve.
>>>> it's simply mathematically so.
>>> It is not. There is no "lesser" end at all.
>>>
>> The bell-shaped curve isn't smaller at either end?
>
> Were you "confused" when you wrote that there is only one "lesser" end?
Quote where I said "one"..lesser end.
No, you can not.
> Maybe if you didn't depend so much upon your ignorant prejudices you
> wouldn't write stupid things.
What's your excuse?
Barack Hussein Bohica
wrote:
>
>"dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>news:hg1apj$9au$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>
>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>> news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "SMITH29" <smi...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> OK, the point being homosexuality is at the "lesser" end of the curve.
>> it's simply mathematically so.
>>
>> Thus to those in the larger swath of the curve it appears ab_normal.
>>
>> It would have to.
>
>You mean that there are less homosexual people than heterosexual?
>Well, yes.. like there are less left-handed people than right-handed.
>I don't know that left-handed folk would be described as 'abnormal' though.
You haven't met my sister...
Barack Hussein Bohica
<49...@pr.49er.pr.com> wrote:
>
>"Pink Freud" <some...@here.com> wrote in message
>news:32%Um.31224$ox2....@newsfe05.ams2...
>>
>> "Yer Pal Al" <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:45a58a74-9d64-414d...@2g2000prl.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Dec 12, 4:13 pm, "Pink Freud" <somewh...@here.com> wrote:
>>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:hg1apj$9au$3...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>> >>news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> >>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>> >>>>news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> >>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >>>>>> "SMITH29" <smit...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> Being left handed doesn't affect the health of the human species as
>>> far as I can tell.
>>
>> Neither does being gay. If you are worried about STDs personally, then
>> use protection or practise abstinence.
>> Beyond that, I can't see that it is any more of your business than whether
>> people go rock climbing, handgliding, or smoke daily.
>
>Al's one of those "good loyal Americans" who minds everybody's business but
>his own.
Kirk's one of those "special Americans" who keeps short bus drivers
employed.
Barack Hussein Bohica
>Yer Pal Al wrote:
>
>> Yet conservatives are happier,
>
>Much like the mentally challenged are.
>
>> give more of their time and money to
>> charity,
>
>While constantly bitching and whining about paying too much taxes for
>social services that could be better spent on more wars, weapons, police
>and prisons. One can never have enough prisons.
You're quite right, what with the trash being produced by the liberal
education system
>> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
>
>Yeah, right. All those fucking Bible Belt rednecks have doctorates,
>don't they?
You sure do hate a lot of people.
Barack Hussein Bohica
They should let you tell them how to spend their money? Oh, right -
you're a fascist.
>> are less likely to be poor or a high school drop out.
>
>Stealing from others is often profitable.
Unless the gov't is doing the stealing.
>>Obviously you are quite bitter.
>
>Your screeching bigotry indicates that you're projecting.
Your existence indicates God has a wicked sense of humor.
Barack Hussein Bohica
>dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>>Pink Freud wrote:
>>>
>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>> news:hg1962$okm$2...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "dilecticon" <d...@lect.edu> wrote in message
>>>>> news:hg0tho$vo9$4...@news.eternal-september.org...
>>>>>> Pink Freud wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "SMITH29" <smi...@comcast.net> wrote in message
>It is not. There is no "lesser" end at all.
...says the twit anchoring the left end of the curve.
Barack Hussein Bohica
>Yer Pal Al <caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Dec 12, 3:42�pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>> Yer Pal Al �<caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >On Dec 12, 12:30�pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>>> >> SMITH29 �<smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>> >> >Syd M. wrote:
>>> >> >> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>>> >> >>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
>>> >> >>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>>> >> >>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>>> >> >>> against that too.
>>>
>>> >> >> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>>> >> >> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>>> >> >> And you homophobes are losing.
>>>
>>> >> >Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
>>> >> >anything.
>>>
>>> >> You're not normal. �You're twisted by your hate and your fear.
>>>
>>> >If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
>>> >member then stop being one.
>>>
>>> And there's the nazi propaganda.
>>
>>And there goes another turd burglar Godwinizing himself because he
>
>The nazis included homosexuals in the Holocaust.
They included even more in their leadership.
Barack Hussein Bohica
<caddys...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Dec 12, 4:04�pm, dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>> > Yer Pal Al �<caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Dec 12, 3:42 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> >>> Yer Pal Al �<caddyshack...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On Dec 12, 12:30 pm, rfisc...@sonic.net (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> >>>>> SMITH29 �<smit...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> >>>>>> Syd M. wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On Dec 11, 11:33 pm, "J" <Jvisi...@live.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> It seems that every week there's more bad news for homos in their quest for
>> >>>>>>>> marital legitimacy. Gays should stay quiet, call it quits and be happy with
>> >>>>>>>> civil unions; at the rate they're going, the people might decide to vote
>> >>>>>>>> against that too.
>> >>>>>>> Don't be too smug just yet, Junkie; More and more people are seeing
>> >>>>>>> this for the civil rights issue that it is.
>> >>>>>>> And you homophobes are losing.
>> >>>>>> Normal people have a difficult time wanting to give you homosexuals
>> >>>>>> anything.
>> >>>>> You're not normal. �You're twisted by your hate and your fear.
>> >>>> If you don't like being treated like a homosexual, criminal or Klan
>> >>>> member then stop being one.
>> >>> And there's the nazi propaganda.
>> >> And there goes another turd burglar Godwinizing himself because he
>>
>> > The nazis
>>
>> Twice now.
>
>They are desperately seeking victimhood status - now it's a homo-
>holocaust.
Homocaust?
Barack Hussein Bohica
<49...@pr.49er.pr.com> wrote:
>
>"Syd M." <pdwri...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:9f0ab6c0-519b-450c...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>> knows that homos already have the same rights as everyone else.
>
>Oh, look... Another lying bigot.
>
>PDW
>
>Al, like many other morons, has Godwin on the brain. Yet they all fail at
>actually understanding it's meaning.
>
>Even thought I didn't vote for Obama, I'm glad he won.
You waited 'til Wednesday to vote, didja?
>It finally showed the world how pathetically devoid of character these
>neocon cretins are.
>
Ray Fischer
Ray Fischer
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>>
>>>>> OK, the point being homosexuality is at the "lesser" end of the curve.
>>>>> it's simply mathematically so.
>>>> It is not. There is no "lesser" end at all.
>>>>
>>> The bell-shaped curve isn't smaller at either end?
>>
>> Were you "confused" when you wrote that there is only one "lesser" end?
>
>Quote where I said "one"..lesser end.
So the asshole is playing little games, now. Tell us, asshole: When
one writes "the" end is that a plural or a singular?
>> Maybe if you didn't depend so much upon your ignorant prejudices you
>> wouldn't write stupid things.
>
>What's your excuse?
I have to dumb it down for morons like you.
--
Ray Fischer
rfis...@sonic.net
dilecticon
> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>> dilecticon <d...@lect.edu> wrote:
>>>>>> OK, the point being homosexuality is at the "lesser" end of the curve.
>>>>>> it's simply mathematically so.
>>>>> It is not. There is no "lesser" end at all.
>>>>>
>>>> The bell-shaped curve isn't smaller at either end?
>>> Were you "confused" when you wrote that there is only one "lesser" end?
>> Quote where I said "one"..lesser end.
>
> So the asshole is playing little games, now.
Why yes, you are.
> Tell us, asshole: When
> one writes "the" end is that a plural or a singular?
Read again and comprehend, cunt:
"The bell-shaped curve isn't smaller at either end?"
Homosexuality would be at one end, and perhaps nymphomania and
hetero-hypersexuality at the other, got it, dumbass?
>>> Maybe if you didn't depend so much upon your ignorant prejudices you
>>> wouldn't write stupid things.
>> What's your excuse?
>
> I have to dumb it down for morons like you.
>
You have no other mode than dumb, you stupid sack of shit.