Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Need a good laugh at a Faggots expense?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Oct 31, 2008, 9:50:14 AM10/31/08
to
This is a new feature of APH called The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit
watch. Every day we shall observe the clock ticking and count the days
since Faggot Emerson Wainwright lied about pursuing a lawsuit, which
is referred to herein as what it actually is, a k00ksuit. You are
invited to post any outragous, interesting comments and/or lies made
by Emerson Wainwright or any of his sockpuppets which include:


Guillaume Ier de Normandie
ScottyFLL
Enos Penvy
Cupid Stunt


There are others. Points will be gives for each new sock that is
discovered.


The official Wainwright k00ksuite clock
____________________________
/ Wednsday 29 October, 2008 \
/) ,-----------. o (\
( | 6 : 00 pm | /_\ ))
\) '-----------' " (/
\____________________________/


The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit watch:
How long has Scott been lying?


219 DAYS AND COUNTING.


"And as I've told you before, nothing will happen, not a damn thing"--
James Riske


~~The Daily k00kwrightism~~


{How can one person say so many stupid things?}

"He ("Nomen Nescio") doesn't want anyone to SEE the legal implications
of his tortious behavior"--Scott Salberg, aka Johnny k00kran babbles
for usenet again.


"What I posted there actually came from a lawyer who is familiar with
libel law, and who is aware of the facts in this case. So smirk all ya
want"--I'm still smirking, Faggot, as a matter of fact, we all are. :-
))


-----------------------------------------------------------------------


The Emerson k00kwright hall of shame archives.


"I've not been humiliated. You are incapable of humiliating me. I'm
honest, I have integrity, I admit when I make a mistake"--k00k Emerson
Wainwright posting with his current sock Guillaume Ier de Normandie
....................................................................


"Public newsgroups are public, I'm part of the public, and if I want
to
post a picture of a nipple on alt.bible or alt.religion, I'm gonna do
it"-- k00k Emerson Wainwright shows his *integrity*
....................................................................


"I do not use sockpuppets and i am not a troll"--Emerson Wainwright


....................................................................


"Stick that up your ass and smoke it"--Emersons Freudian slip is
evidence of how much mouth to anal/shite contact is woven into Faggot
life.
....................................................................


"Suit will be filed in Broward county"--Emersons lie is obvious to
everyone that see's it.
....................................................................


"Naw. One doesn't have to be rich to file suit. One doesn't even
need a lawyer -- I can file the action myself against John Doe,
present my evidence to a judge, and have subpoenas issued. Some
lawyers will take cases on a contingency basis, especially in Broward
County, whose juries don't like online libel one bit"--Well, Emerson
is consistent if nothing else.


....................................................................
"Ah. But see, I DID enter a complaint with IC3. Which means that I
have gotten further than the others you've run in to who threaten
suits"--Laughingly, Emerson thought IC3, an entity that tracks
internet terrorists, credit-card con-men, thieves, child
pornographers, etc. would join in his pathetic usenet troll
shananigans.
....................................................................


"That'll be too late if he wants to keep his identity secret, though.
The subpoenas to the ISPs will bypass him; he can't be served until we
know exactly who to serve. One of my correspondents said something
about a pre-summons settlement that could be done without revealing
his identity and with a privacy clause (in which case I wouldn't be
able to reveal anything about the case), but Blobby still thinks I'm
bluffing"--Emersons fantasies get the best of him. I'm not Bob but i
still think he's bluffing :-)) Perhaps he thought somebody would offer
him cash?? LOL!!!
....................................................................


"I have linked your WebTV account to your AOL account. I have headers
of scores of messages in which you libel me. Many of your libellous
messages remain online as you have had dozens of accounts banned due
to TOS violations.
....................................................................


Really all I need to do is:


1. Get the subpoenas issued and out and wait for the responses (from
WebTV, AOL, and Google).


2. Go into the judge's chambers, show him your tortious behavior, and
wait for him to tell me how much money I should expect to receive.


Blobby, your ONLINE SURPRISE is almost ready!!! I wanted to reveal it
to you TODAY, and in fact almost DID! But then I thought I should
wait until I've REALLY got some goods.


Just gonna wait another day or two. Wish I could show you NOW, I
really do!


HINT: the information I'm getting is gonna make you fill your
panties!


More later! (Read: when I decide to reveal!)


G'night, Blobby! Don't worry be happy! :-))"--A perfect example of
poor upbringing and the absense of any life whatsoever for poor
unemployed Emerson Wainwright


....................................................................


"Blobby, you are in some serious denial. I strongly suggest you have a
look at what has been written in misc.legal. In a few days, I'll show
you some more stuff. But the suggestions are there for your defense.
I advise you have a look before it's too late"--Scott shows us how his
sick mind can't distingish between reality and fantasy.
....................................................................


"That a link to a female nipple made its way to alt.bible or wherever
is simply Too Fucking Bad. They'll get over it. Nobody will die.
Nobody will be injured. Nobody will go blind"--Scotts respect for
others is amazing.


.....................................................................


"What I posted there actually came from a lawyer who is familiar with
libel law, and who is aware of the facts in this case. So smirk all ya
want"--I'm still smirking, Faggot, as a matter of fact, we all are. :-
))

RedDog

unread,
Oct 31, 2008, 9:55:11 PM10/31/08
to
On Oct 31, 1:50 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> This is a new feature of APH called The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit
> watch. Every day we shall observe the clock ticking and count the days
> since Faggot Emerson Wainwright lied about pursuing a lawsuit, which

He didn't lie, and you know it, Bob. Otherwise, you wouldn't have had
your lawyer contact him to arrange a settlement.

>
> There are others. Points will be gives for each new sock that is
> discovered.

Since Emerson immediately admits to his sockpuppets, it will be no
problem to collect your "prize". Uh, what *is* the prize anyway, Bob?
(And please don't tell me it's a squirt from your fat wife's
JSPTS ..... k?)

> How long has Scott been lying?
>
> 219 DAYS AND COUNTING.
>

How long has bobandcarole been running and hiding behind anonymous
remailers?

196 DAYS AND COUNTING (i.e. ever since Emerson scared him out of his
panties)

> "And as I've told you before, nothing will happen, not a damn thing"--
> James Riske

Ya think?

>
> "I've not been humiliated. You are incapable of humiliating me. I'm
> honest, I have integrity, I admit when I make a mistake"--k00k Emerson
> Wainwright posting with his current sock Guillaume Ier de Normandie

Yeah. So?

>
> "Suit will be filed in Broward county"--Emersons lie is obvious to
> everyone that see's it.

Then why are you arranging a settlement, Bob?

>
> "Naw. One doesn't have to be rich to file suit. One doesn't even
> need a lawyer -- I can file the action myself against John Doe,
> present my evidence to a judge, and have subpoenas issued. Some
> lawyers will take cases on a contingency basis, especially in Broward
> County, whose juries don't like online libel one bit"--Well, Emerson
> is consistent if nothing else.

Consistent in telling the truth? Yeah, I agree.

>
> ....................................................................
> "Ah. But see, I DID enter a complaint with IC3. Which means that I
> have gotten further than the others you've run in to who threaten
> suits"--Laughingly, Emerson thought IC3, an entity that tracks
> internet terrorists, credit-card con-men, thieves, child
> pornographers, etc. would join in his pathetic usenet troll
> shananigans.

You misspelled "shenanigans", fuckwit. But of course now you're claim
you did that on purpose to "trap" us, right? LOL!

> "That'll be too late if he wants to keep his identity secret, though.
> The subpoenas to the ISPs will bypass him; he can't be served until we
> know exactly who to serve. One of my correspondents said something
> about a pre-summons settlement that could be done without revealing
> his identity and with a privacy clause (in which case I wouldn't be
> able to reveal anything about the case), but Blobby still thinks I'm
> bluffing"--Emersons fantasies get the best of him. I'm not Bob but i
> still think he's bluffing :-)) Perhaps he thought somebody would offer
> him cash?? LOL!!!

Probably he did. And he was right,

>I'm still smirking, Faggot :-

At least I'll take your word for that one, Bob. After all, you're just
a fucking dumbass.

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 9:50:07 AM11/1/08
to

On Oct 31, 8:55 pm, RedDog <cap...@budweiser.com> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 1:50 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > This is a new feature of APH called The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit
> > watch. Every day we shall observe the clock ticking and count the
days
> > since Faggot Emerson Wainwright lied about pursuing a lawsuit,
which
>
> He didn't lie, and you know it, Bob. Otherwise, you wouldn't have had
> your lawyer contact him to arrange a settlement.

ROTFLMAO!!!!

Your lies are getting ridiclous, Red Dog Dick, even for you.

Of course he has no proof at all to back this ludicrous statement,
i don't have legal representation and have no need for such
representation.
:-))

You are a liar and a troll, RDD. Usenet would throw celebrate if you
died tomorrow.

Now run along lad and find an arse to lick or a religous ng to
terrorize.


Emerson Wainwright

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 2:08:26 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 1, 9:50 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> On Oct 31, 8:55 pm, RedDog <cap...@budweiser.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 1:50 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > > This is a new feature of APH called The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit
> > > watch. Every day we shall observe the clock ticking and count the
> days
> > > since Faggot Emerson Wainwright lied about pursuing a lawsuit,
> which
>
> > He didn't lie, and you know it, Bob. Otherwise, you wouldn't have had
> > your lawyer contact him to arrange a settlement.
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!!
>
> Your lies are getting ridiclous, Red Dog Dick, even for you.
>


> Of course he has no proof at all to back this ludicrous statement,
> i don't have legal representation and have no need for such
> representation.
> :-))

Finally a flat-out admission!

Good thing you never nip at the bait, Blobby!!

Thanks for playing, Blobby!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Message has been deleted

Enos Penvy

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 4:12:49 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 1, 4:01 pm, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 11:08:26 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright

>
>
>
> <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Nov 1, 9:50 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> >> On Oct 31, 8:55 pm, RedDog <cap...@budweiser.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Oct 31, 1:50 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > This is a new feature of APH called The Emerson Wainwright k00ksuit
> >> > > watch. Every day we shall observe the clock ticking and count the
> >> days
> >> > > since Faggot Emerson Wainwright lied about pursuing a lawsuit,
> >> which
>
> >> > He didn't lie, and you know it, Bob. Otherwise, you wouldn't have had
> >> > your lawyer contact him to arrange a settlement.
>
> >> ROTFLMAO!!!!
>
> >> Your lies are getting ridiclous, Red Dog Dick, even for you.
>
> >> Of course he has no proof at all to back this ludicrous statement,
> >> i don't have legal representation and have no need for such
> >> representation.
> >> :-))
>
> >Finally a flat-out admission!
>
> Where's the so called admission?

Your response is the admission, Blobby.

> If the guy says he hasn't even got an attorney ..let alone used one to
> contact Emerson..then that is a denial not an admission..

Well, yes, it is a denial.

It is a denial to the accusation that Bob -- BOB -- had his attorney
contact me, to which "Nomen Nescio" responds, "I have no attorney".

LOL!!!!!!!!!!

> >Thanks for playing, Blobby!!  LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>

> I have seen nothing but unsupported allegations suggesting
> this anonymous poster is B&C...

Yeah, Blobby, we hear ya.

> do you have any evidence that
> contradicts the fact he posts with a British linguistic style not an
> American one?

"The fact" that you post with a British linguistic style? Well...
that ISN'T a fact, now, is it? :-)

Anyway, there's lots of evidence. American spelling ("color" vs.
"colour"), incorrectly using the British term "telly" to refer to a
telephone rather than a television... really too many to mention.

> Did B&C really offer a settlement via an attorney?
>
> This seems highly improbable..

Do tell us, Blobby. So embarrassing that now you're posting again as
Brandon D Cartwright. And without any NNTP host listed. Just like
Blobby!! LOL!!

:-))

Message has been deleted

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:55:20 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 1, 10:48 pm, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT), Enos Penvy

> >Well, yes, it is a denial.
>
> >It is a denial to the accusation that Bob -- BOB -- had his attorney
> >contact me, to which "Nomen Nescio" responds, "I have no attorney".
>
> >LOL!!!!!!!!!!
>

> So...in your world denying you have an attorney means admitting you
> have an attorney?

Oh, my. That comprehension problem you have should have been dealt
with back in your fourth-grade reading class.

How do we clear this up for you?

Oh, I know. You can just have a look at the two new AUK nominations:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/thread/4414e3a831b89fdc#

As you can see, it's clear to EVERYONE.

If YOU'RE having trouble understanding... well... that's YOUR problem.

:-))

Message has been deleted

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 11:26:46 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 1, 11:14 pm, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:

> IMHO nominating an anonymous remailer is pretty problematic but that's
> none of my concern either..

Then you won't mind if I tell you to STFU.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 1:54:04 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 1:18 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 20:26:46 -0700 (PDT), Guillaume Ier de Normandie
> Actually

Hm. Well, you JUST SAID that it's "none of [your] concern"... yet
here you go again...

> IIRC  it's a concern resting firmly in the province of the
> FNVW

Blobby has just been nominated again for two more awards. By AUK, not
by me. They nominated him (this time) based on his kookiness and the
fact that he self-outed and self-nuked in a recent post (which was
described as "hilarious" in the nomination).

> not a kook like yourself..

Well, now you've created a little problem for yourself. See, you've
given credence to the FNVW above, saying that it is the FNVW's domain,
yet you seem to have taken over that role *here* and deemed me a kook,
without any suggestion from the FNVW that I am one.

I've not even been nominated.

So which is it? Is the FNVW's word law, or is it not? Because you've
contradicted your position(s) here.

> so your opinion is as moot as ever..

Incorrect. What you call our "opinion" is based on evidence. AUK
accepts and agrees with the evidence, so it is actually YOUR point --
whatever the hell that might be -- that might well be deemed moot at
this juncture. In other words, unless you can provide evidence to the
contrary, Nomen Nescio is bobandcarole. Your protestations to the
contrary are lacking in substance.

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 2:28:18 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 1:53 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT), Enos Penvy

> Out of curiosity...just how many sock puppets do you have?

I have no idea? Why? Is it making you a nervous wreck?

> just as a POI you have been trolling.. lying...

Proof?

> stalking...

Proof?

> having
> conversations with yourself..

Proof?

> and obsessing with this one for THREE
> whole months now..
> Obsessed doesn't begin to cover it..

I see. So, my being involved in discussions -- even if they're flame
wars -- with people constitutes an "obsession" in your mind. How
very.... odd. So... you're obsessed, too, then! Maybe we can start a
support group!

Anyhoooooooooooooooo, after scaring Blobby into the fetid bowels of
the dingey backrooms of anonymous remailers, I can assure you I was
minding my own business, until he resurfaced.

If you think *I* sought *him* out, you can kindly show us evidence.
Of course, I'd not have been able to find him, since he no longer
posts here, right?

LOL! What a loon you are.

> >I didn't "troll" misc.legal.
>
> and you aren't boasting in pedophile groups about how you got two
> threads going in misc.legal either
> I suppose?

What kind of a nutjob are you? In misc.legal, I sought legal advice
(admittedly, posing as the person in Blobby's shoes, instead of as the
victim of a civil wrong). That can hardly be called "trolling". I
was discussing the legal issues regarding the tort known as "libel per
se", and by doing so, got information on how a DEFENSE might work.
Pretty fucking brilliant if you ask me!

And what are these "pedophile groups" to which you refer, other than
B&C's hang-out alt.support.boy-lovers? And why are you concerned if I
x-post to a pedophile group known to harbor the likes of B&C? That's
where B&C used to hang out!! He was very proud of it!!

Here again, you contradict yourself!! You're trying to defend Blobby,
and in so doing, you'll project his qualities (obsession, posting to
pedo groups) and apply it TO ME and say IT'S BAD!! LOL!!!!!!!

You really DO need some help. Seriously. Not kidding here.

> To be fair to trolls .. I guess some would consider you more of a
> psychotic stalker than a troll

Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members
of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.).

For example, B&C has been known for years as Usenet's most vulgar and
vile troll. I got rid of him. By baiting him and getting him to fuck
up. He's been gone for months, forced to hide behind anonymous
remailers! His resurfacing as Nomen Nescio hasn't worked (he's too
obvious, and not smart enough to NOT be obvious), and he fell for the
bait I set out for him AGAIN! LOL!! Now, THAT'S some good
TROLLING!! :-)

Oh, BTW, did I mention that you are a pussy posting anonymously, and
thus have zero credibility? It's true.

:-)

Anyhoooooooooooooo, while you call ME psychotic, and obsessed, it is
not I, but rather YOU, who claims to be a disinterested party in this
matter, but who just can't seem to get enough of what you yourself
have admitted is none of your business!!

> Seek help..
> your obsession is getting way out of control

See supra. Are you following Blobby's advice, and reading through the
archives for a month before posting? It has to be a full month, you
know! LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Or have you been following this all along?
And if so, why? Since it doesn't concern you, why the obsession? Why
even bother commenting on it at all? Why spend time on me like this?

Message has been deleted

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 3:00:24 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:28:18 -0700 (PDT), Guillaume Ier de Normandie
> I was simply wondering what had actually happened to B&C and foolishly
> thought you might have some actual information but it seems that you
> have no more idea than anyone else and revel in grotesque claims that
> myriads of posters are actually him ..including myself..

Bobandcarole has been threatened with a lawsuit and has not posted as
"bobandcarole" (or similar nyms) that we know of since he found out
that a complaint was filed with IC3 on April 18. That is the last
known date that he posted, and is also the date that a libelous blog
bearing my real name was taken down.

He is now posting through anonymous remailers and similar anonymous
protocols. One of his nyms is "Nomen Nescio", which is used by people
who post through dizum.

> In reality he hasn't posted for a long time now and may be ill or even
> dead but don't let reality get in the way of your fantasies...

See supra.

> If anyone else has any actual information I would be glad to hear it..

If I file this lawsuit, and get at least to discovery, I will post the
information here. You can count on it.

> Whatever else B&C did a stalwart job in exposing the rationalizations
> and self-deceptions of filthy child rapists  and preventing the
> formation of nests of child molesters  for a long time and he deserves
> full credit for this....

I have no idea about that. Seems to me he likes to take a lot of
credit for that, but the end result is that the very people he
"scared" out of groups are now privately doing the exact same thing
with nobody keeping an eye on them.
IOW, he didn't cure anyone, the people still exist, they still have
their obsession or fetish or whatever you want to call it, but they
are now not trackable. Good work? That's debatable.

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 9:30:06 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:28:18 -0700 (PDT), Guillaume Ier de Normandie
<guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote

That can hardly be called "trolling". I


> >was discussing the legal issues regarding the tort known as "libel
per
> >se", and by doing so, got information on how a DEFENSE might work.
> >Pretty fucking brilliant if you ask me!

Oh you're a legend in your own mind, troll!
LOL!!!


>
> >And what are these "pedophile groups" to which you refer, other than
> >B&C's hang-out alt.support.boy-lovers? And why are you concerned if
I
> >x-post to a pedophile group known to harbor the likes of B&C? That's
> >where B&C used to hang out!! He was very proud of it!!
>
> >Here again, you contradict yourself!! You're trying to defend
Blobby,
> >and in so doing, you'll project his qualities (obsession, posting to
> >pedo groups) and apply it TO ME and say IT'S BAD!! LOL!!!!!!!
>
> >You really DO need some help. Seriously. Not kidding here.
>
> >> To be fair to trolls .. I guess some would consider you more of a
> >> psychotic stalker than a troll
>
> >Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll

What a reputation to have!!

ROTFLMAO!!!

(and to be
> >honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
> >in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
> >when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members
> >of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.).
>
> >For example, B&C has been known for years as Usenet's most vulgar and
> >vile troll.

Proof??


> I got rid of him.

Proof??


By baiting him and getting him to fuck
> >up. He's been gone for months, forced to hide behind anonymous
> >remailers! His resurfacing as Nomen Nescio hasn't worked (he's too
> >obvious, and not smart enough to NOT be obvious), and he fell for the
> >bait I set out for him AGAIN! LOL!! Now, THAT'S some good
> >TROLLING!! :-)

Oh, the mark of the liar jumps up and bites him on the arse again:

"Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members

of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.}"--Scott
Salberg aka Guillaume Ier de Normandie

I'm sure that alt.bible has a genuine "interest" in Scotts homosexual
pornography! :-))

Do you think alt.sewing also gets excited
over Scotts vulgar, off topic horseshite?

>
> >Oh, BTW, did I mention that you are a pussy posting anonymously, and
> >thus have zero credibility? It's true.
>
> >:-)
>
> >Anyhoooooooooooooo, while you call ME psychotic, and obsessed, it is
> >not I, but rather YOU, who claims to be a disinterested party in this
> >matter, but who just can't seem to get enough of what you yourself
> >have admitted is none of your business!!
>
> >> Seek help..
> >> your obsession is getting way out of control
>
> >See supra. Are you following Blobby's advice, and reading through
the
> >archives for a month before posting? It has to be a full month, you
> >know! LOL!!!!!!!!!!! Or have you been following this all along?
> >And if so, why? Since it doesn't concern you, why the obsession?
Why
> >even bother commenting on it at all? Why spend time on me like this?
>
> I was simply wondering what had actually happened to B&C and foolishly
> thought you might have some actual information but it seems that you
> have no more idea than anyone else and revel in grotesque claims that
> myriads of posters are actually him ..including myself..

Considering the fact that this dolt thinks you and i are both b&c, it's
probaby next to impossible to get a straight answer out of him.
{no pun intended}

>
> In reality he hasn't posted for a long time now and may be ill or even
> dead but don't let reality get in the way of your fantasies...

Scott is sick in the head. I believe he suffers from a form of mental
illness and is on a government assistance check.



> If anyone else has any actual information I would be glad to hear it..
>

> Whatever else B&C did a stalwart job in exposing the rationalizations
> and self-deceptions of filthy child rapists and preventing the
> formation of nests of child molesters for a long time and he deserves
> full credit for this

Yes, bob caused several Paedophiles to have nervous breakdowns! It was
amusing to watch over the years. Of course that was before Faggot Scott
knew what usenet was because he's still considered a n00b troll in
training with only a couple of years of harrassing innocent/religous
newsgroups with his obscene, vulgar horseshite.

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 2:37:12 PM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 9:30 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:

You have made me see the error of my ways, Blobby.

I will try to make it up to you and the rest of the world.

Here is my plan for making amends to all of those harmed by my non-
stop lying:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/thread/4414e3a831b89fdc#

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 5:10:05 PM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 2:37 pm, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/..

As expected, Faggot Scott retaliates by posting a load of horseshite
regarding some childish, make believe "award" in a futile attempt
to cover the fact that he is indeed caught in a lie. Yes, he's caught
and humiliated once again and i'm sure it won't be the last time.

Faggot Scott Salberg *is* a liar.


"Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members
of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.}"--Scott

Salberg aka Guillaume Ier de Normandie, aka Emerson Wainwright, aka
Enos Penvy, aka ScottyFLL

See it here:
http://tinyurl.com/ScottsLie


Does Scott actually think that the members of alt.bible, alt.sewing,
etal have a "genuine interest" in his vulgar comments and homosexual
pornography?

Remember this?

"Public newsgroups are public, I'm part of the public, and if I want
to post a picture of a nipple on alt.bible or alt.religion, I'm gonna
do it"-- k00k Emerson Wainwright shows his *integrity*

See it here:
http://tinyurl.com/FromThek00ksuitLiar

Now watch Faggot Scott retaliate by posting a load of horseshite
regarding some childish, make believe "award" in a futile attempt
to cover the fact that he is indeed caught in a lie. Yes, he's caught
and humiliated once again and i'm sure it won't be the last time.

Faggot Scott Salberg *is* a liar.

His mother is a fat hog, see below:
http://tinyurl.com/FatNasty

:-))

Enos Penvy

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 5:44:36 PM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 5:10 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2:37 pm, Guillaume Ier de Normandie<guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 9:30 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > You have made me see the error of my ways, Blobby.
>
> > I will try to make it up to you and the rest of the world.
>
> > Here is my plan for making amends to all of those harmed by my non-
> > stop lying:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/..
>
> As expected, Faggot Scott retaliates by posting a load of horseshite

Well, let the reader decide if it's "horseshite", OK? Virtually
everyone here (and anywhere else, for that matter) is better educated
-- and therefore better able to discern fact from fiction -- than you
are.

The following link documents your Kookiness in the Kookdom of the
Kookiest Kookwits.

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/thread/4414e3a831b89fdc#

CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR TWO NEW NOMINATIONS, BLOBTARDIA!!!
LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 3, 2008, 10:50:06 AM11/3/08
to
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.homosexuality/browse_frm/...

>
> CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR TWO NEW NOMINATIONS, BLOBTARDIA!!!
> LOL!!!!!!!!!!

Yawn...

Everybody isn't interested in living in your fantasy world of childish
make believe awards, Faggot. Most of us outgrew that stage years ago.

See documented proof of Faggot Salbergs lies below:


"Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members
of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.}"--Scott
Salberg aka Guillaume Ier de Normandie, aka Emerson Wainwright, aka
Enos Penvy, aka ScottyFLL


Does Scott actually think that the members of alt.bible, alt.sewing,
etal have a "genuine interest" in his vulgar comments and homosexual
pornography?

Remember this?

"Public newsgroups are public, I'm part of the public, and if I want
to post a picture of a nipple on alt.bible or alt.religion, I'm gonna
do it"-- k00k Emerson Wainwright shows his *integrity*

Now watch Faggot Scott retaliate by posting a load of horseshite
regarding some childish, make believe "award" in a futile attempt
to cover the fact that he is indeed caught in a lie. Yes, he's caught
and humiliated once again and i'm sure it won't be the last time.

Faggot Scott Salberg *is* a liar.

His mother is a fat nasty hog, see below:
http://tinyurl.com/FatNasty

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 10:20:05 AM11/5/08
to
On Nov 2, 3:00 am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
<guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 00:28:18 -0700 (PDT), Guillaume Ier de Normandie
>
> > <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >victim of a civil wrong). That can hardly be called "trolling".
I
> > >was discussing the legal issues regarding the tort known
as "libel per
> > >se", and by doing so, got information on how a DEFENSE might work.
> > >Pretty fucking brilliant if you ask me!
>
> > >And what are these "pedophile groups" to which you refer, other
than
> > >B&C's hang-out alt.support.boy-lovers? And why are you concerned
if I
> > >x-post to a pedophile group known to harbor the likes of B&C?
That's
> > >where B&C used to hang out!! He was very proud of it!!
>
> > >Here again, you contradict yourself!! You're trying to defend
Blobby,
> > >and in so doing, you'll project his qualities (obsession, posting
to
> > >pedo groups) and apply it TO ME and say IT'S BAD!! LOL!!!!!!!
>
> > >You really DO need some help. Seriously. Not kidding here.
>
> > >> To be fair to trolls .. I guess some would consider you more of
a
> > >> psychotic stalker than a troll
>
> > >Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and
to be
> > >honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll.
Except
> > >in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
> > >when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many
members
> > >of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.).
>
> > >For example, B&C has been known for years as Usenet's most vulgar
and
> > >vile troll. I got rid of him. By baiting him and getting him to
fuck
> > >up. He's been gone for months, forced to hide behind anonymous
> > >remailers! His resurfacing as Nomen Nescio hasn't worked (he's
too
> > >obvious, and not smart enough to NOT be obvious), and he fell for
the
> > >bait I set out for him AGAIN! LOL!! Now, THAT'S some good
> > >TROLLING!! :-)
>
> Bobandcarole has been threatened with a lawsuit and has not posted as
> "bobandcarole" (or similar nyms) that we know of since he found out
> that a complaint was filed with IC3 on April 18. That is the last
> known date that he posted, and is also the date that a libelous blog
> bearing my real name was taken down.
>
> He is now posting through anonymous remailers and similar anonymous
> protocols. One of his nyms is "Nomen Nescio", which is used by
people
> who post through dizum.
>
> > In reality he hasn't posted for a long time now and may be ill or
even
> > dead but don't let reality get in the way of your fantasies...
>
> See supra.

>
> > If anyone else has any actual information I would be glad to hear
it..
>
> If I file this lawsuit, and get at least to discovery, I will post
the
> information here. You can count on it.
>
> > Whatever else B&C did a stalwart job in exposing the
rationalizations
> > and self-deceptions of filthy child rapists and preventing the
> > formation of nests of child molesters for a long time and he
deserves
> > full credit for this....
>
> I have no idea about that. Seems to me he likes to take a lot of
> credit for that, but the end result is that the very people he
> "scared" out of groups are now privately doing the exact same thing
> with nobody keeping an eye on them.
> IOW, he didn't cure anyone, the people still exist, they still have
> their obsession or fetish or whatever you want to call it, but they
> are now not trackable. Good work? That's debatable.

It is logical that as a deviant Scott can't appreciate the good work
of disrupting a place where deviants came to prey on innocent
children. His style is to disrupt the religous ng's with Homosexual
pronography.

Emerson Hussein Wainwright

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 1:36:22 PM11/5/08
to

If they were preying on innocent children, you should have called the
authorities.

Instead, you sent them underground.

GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:40:12 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 1:36 pm, Emerson Hussein Wainwright

They are reported, Faggot. Bob has reported many of them as i have.

>
> GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!

It isn't polite to speak of your mother like that, you forgot to add
FAT ARSE PIG ..

LOL!!

alt.bible and alt.religion deleted as they obviously have no interest
in Faggot Scotts vulgar troll horseshite.

Scott Salberg, like Red Dog dick, isn't close to being a good liar but
he persists in trying.


see below:


"Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members

of the group, will have an interest in what I'm posting.}"--Scott
Salberg aka Guillaume Ier de Normandie, aka Emerson Wainwright, aka
Enos Penvy, aka ScottyFLL


Does Scott actually think that the members of alt.bible, alt.sewing,
etal have a "genuine interest" in his vulgar comments and homosexual
pornography?


Remember this?


"Public newsgroups are public, I'm part of the public, and if I want
to post a picture of a nipple on alt.bible or alt.religion, I'm gonna
do it"-- k00k Emerson Wainwright shows his *integrity*


Now watch Faggot Scott retaliate by posting a load of horseshite
regarding some childish, make believe "award" in a futile attempt
to cover the fact that he is indeed caught in a lie. Yes, he's caught
and humiliated once again and i'm sure it won't be the last time.


Faggot Scott Salberg *is* a liar.


His mother *is* a fat nasty hog, see below:
http://tinyurl.com/FatNasty

Cupid Stunt

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 4:13:08 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 3:40 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>  On Nov 5, 1:36 pm, Emerson Hussein Wainwright
>
>
>
>
>
> <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 10:20 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 2, 3:00 am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
>
> > > <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> > > > I have no idea about that.  Seems to me he likes to take a lot of
> > > > credit for that, but the end result is that the very people he
> > > > "scared" out of groups are now privately doing the exact same
> thing
> > > > with nobody keeping an eye on them.
> > > > IOW, he didn't cure anyone, the people still exist, they still
> have
> > > > their obsession or fetish or whatever you want to call it, but
> they
> > > > are now not trackable.  Good work?  That's debatable.
>
> > > It is logical that as a deviant Scott can't appreciate the good work
> > > of disrupting a place where deviants came to prey on innocent
> > > children.
>
> > If they were preying on innocent children, you should have called the
> > authorities.
>
> > Instead, you sent them underground.
>
> They are reported, Faggot.

Proof? Evidence? To whom did you report them? Who did you report?
When?

> Bob has reported many of them as i have.

How could you know if Bob reported them if you are not Bob?

> > GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!
>
> It isn't polite to speak of your mother like that, you forgot to add
> FAT ARSE PIG ..

Ah, the old "attack the innocent old lady" ruse.

Just like Bob did! And I can't imagine that there are TWO people who
post here who are so vile as to attack an elderly woman.

wonderer

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 4:48:43 PM11/5/08
to

"Nomen Nescio" <nob...@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:ce99bcf6a8f8f68f...@dizum.com...

> On Nov 5, 1:36 pm, Emerson Hussein Wainwright
> <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 10:20 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 2, 3:00 am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
>>
>> > <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > > On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
>
>> > > I have no idea about that. Seems to me he likes to take a lot of
>> > > credit for that, but the end result is that the very people he
>> > > "scared" out of groups are now privately doing the exact same
> thing
>> > > with nobody keeping an eye on them.
>> > > IOW, he didn't cure anyone, the people still exist, they still
> have
>> > > their obsession or fetish or whatever you want to call it, but
> they
>> > > are now not trackable. Good work? That's debatable.
>>
>> > It is logical that as a deviant Scott can't appreciate the good work
>> > of disrupting a place where deviants came to prey on innocent
>> > children.
>>
>> If they were preying on innocent children, you should have called the
>> authorities.
>>
>> Instead, you sent them underground.
>
> They are reported, Faggot. Bob has reported many of them as i have.

say's nomen while looking in the mirror

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 5:10:02 PM11/5/08
to

On Nov 5, 4:13 pm, Cupid Stunt <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> Proof? Evidence? To whom did you report them? Who did you report?
> When?
>
> > Bob has reported many of them as i have.
>
> How could you know if Bob reported them if you are not Bob?

Just like the others know that post there, it was posted by Bob, idiot.


>
> > > GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!

Projection #1

>
> > It isn't polite to speak of your mother like that, you forgot to add
> > FAT ARSE PIG ..
>

> Ah, the old "attack the innocent old lady" ruse.

I know you love it so much!!

>
> Just like Bob did!

Makes you mad doesn't it??

And I can't imagine that there are TWO people who
> post here who are so vile as to attack an elderly woman

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

I notice that you keep adding alt.bible and alt.religion.
Is that because you "genuinely think the group, or many members
of the group, will have an interest in what you're posting"?

LOL!!! You fucking Faggot liar!!

alt.bible and alt.religion deleted

Cupid Stunt

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 5:31:39 PM11/5/08
to

Sooooo................ show us some proof.

:-)

> > > > GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!
>
> Projection #1

Ummm... it is not I who sent the pedophiles underground where they
can't be monitored.

That would be YOU.

REALLY smart! REALLY!! LOL!!!!


> > Just like Bob did!
>
> Makes you mad doesn't it??

Not at all. It reveals who you really are inside. It takes your
credibility from zero to less-than-zero, as even the very few who
might support you have a bit of a problem with this particular
behavior of yours.


>
>  And I can't imagine that there are TWO people who
>
> > post here who are so vile as to attack an elderly woman
>
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>
> I notice that you keep adding alt.bible and alt.religion.
> Is that because you "genuinely think the group, or many members
> of the group, will have an interest in what you're posting"?

Yep. They're as much a part of your campaign as the other groups you
cross-post to. Do let's get straight the fact that YOU are the one
who started cross-posting. I only posted to two groups before you
came along. I post to those groups that you post to.

My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will take
NOTHING you say seriously.

You're utterly discredited. Everywhere. It boggles the mind that a
man in his 60s, who pretends to have a grasp on politics and the world
in general, would have no problem being disbelieved and laughed at at
every turn. Who, if what you say is true, actually TRIES to come off
as an idiot! VERY strange behavior indeed!

Have a nice day. :-)

Cupid Stunt

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 5:32:44 PM11/5/08
to

And that's an EXTRA-WIDE mirror, if you catch my drift. (As evidenced
by his posts to alt.personals.FAT and alt.personals.BIG-FOLKS)

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 6:50:01 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 5:31 pm, Cupid Stunt <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 5, 5:10 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 5, 4:13 pm, Cupid Stunt <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Proof? Evidence? To whom did you report them? Who did you
report?
> > > When?
>
> > > > Bob has reported many of them as i have.
>


You xpost to them, not me, Fag boi.


> Do let's get straight

"Do let's get straight"??

LOL!!!


the fact that YOU are the one
> who started cross-posting. I only posted to two groups before you
> came along. I post to those groups that you post to.
>
> My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will take
> NOTHING you say seriously.

Every group i post to besides the Faggot gloryholes takes me seriously.

>
> You're utterly discredited.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


Everywhere. It boggles the mind that a
> man in his 60s,

Proof that i'm in my 60's??

> who pretends to have a grasp on politics and the world
> in general, would have no problem being disbelieved and laughed at at
> every turn.

As i've said, you and the AUK Faggots don't count as everybody

Who, if what you say is true, actually TRIES to come off
> as an idiot!

Keeepe dancing. LOL!!!

alt.bible and alt.religion deleted as they obviously have no interest

in your vulgar comments and homosexual pornography.

RedDog

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 7:14:55 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 8:40 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 1:36 pm, Emerson Hussein Wainwright
>
> <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 10:20 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 2, 3:00 am, Guillaume Ier de Normandie
>
> > > <guillaumedenorman...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > On Nov 2, 2:46 am, Brandon D Cartwright <u...@example.net> wrote:
> > > > I have no idea about that. Seems to me he likes to take a lot of
> > > > credit for that, but the end result is that the very people he
> > > > "scared" out of groups are now privately doing the exact same
> thing
> > > > with nobody keeping an eye on them.
> > > > IOW, he didn't cure anyone, the people still exist, they still
> have
> > > > their obsession or fetish or whatever you want to call it, but
> they
> > > > are now not trackable. Good work? That's debatable.
>
> > > It is logical that as a deviant Scott can't appreciate the good work
> > > of disrupting a place where deviants came to prey on innocent
> > > children.
>
> > If they were preying on innocent children, you should have called the
> > authorities.
>
> > Instead, you sent them underground.
>
> They are reported, Faggot. Bob has reported many of them as i have.
>

Yeah, right. Don't you remember when I gave you personal information
on "charlie drifter", including his name, address, and phone number?
Why is he still posting, then, and still openly boasting that he
writes about his own experiences and the experiences of his
correspondents?

RedDog

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 7:18:59 PM11/5/08
to

We already know he's Bob, and yes, it was/is *vile*, to say the least.
Why not sue his ass, then, Emerson? I hope you realize that you'll be
able to convince any judge that Nomen is Bob. This isn't a criminal
case; you don't have to prove it to a jury beyond any reasonable
doubt. All you have to do is show the judge the evidence that you
already have (i.e. that Bob has already given us).

RedDog

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 7:22:06 PM11/5/08
to

Nobody asked for your opinion, you fuckwitted imbecile, so STFU and
get back to sucking those aborigine dicks. That's the only thing
you're good for, after all.

RedDog

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 7:23:22 PM11/5/08
to

LOL!!!

Enos Penvy

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 7:41:02 PM11/5/08
to

I do, because you do.

> > Do let's get straight
>
> "Do let's get straight"??
>
>         LOL!!!

Do you have trouble understanding adult English?

>  the fact that YOU are the one
>
> > who started cross-posting.  I only posted to two groups before you
> > came along.  I post to those groups that you post to.
>
> > My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will take
> > NOTHING you say seriously.
>
> Every group i post to besides the Faggot gloryholes takes me seriously.

Incorrect. You are known to all of Usenet to be a loser. You are
also known to be fat and stupid.


>> Everywhere.  It boggles the mind that a
>
> > man in his 60s,
>
> Proof that i'm in my 60's??

You might be in your very late 50s. You claim to have been in
Vietnam. Your disgusting personal ad of 2000 said you were in your
40s. That same ad revealed that you are very fat, adulterous, and
that your also-fat wife has a "juicy shaved pussy that squirts".
Which is pretty fucking disgusting, especially considering the fact
that Red Dog has proved beyond a doubt that your personal hygiene is,
at best, "lacking".

wonderer

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:41:19 PM11/5/08
to

"Cupid Stunt" <cupid...@rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:b99db55f-7336-4f83...@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

yep that would be right

wonderer

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:42:33 PM11/5/08
to

"RedDog" <cap...@budweiser.com> wrote in message
news:44e84fc6-267e-4df2...@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

id that what you do, go suckind peoples dicks
>


Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 9:27:51 PM11/5/08
to

You're right, of course. Civil actions require only a preponderance
of the evidence. "Likelihood" of fault, really.

> All you have to do is show the judge the evidence that you
> already have (i.e. that Bob has already given us).

I don't need to prove that Nomen is Blobby to a judge. I've never
intended to do that. I have TONS of posts from Blobby's accounts that
are traceable -- the ones he posted before I scared him into the fetid
and dingey backrooms of anonymous remailers.

Indeed, most of these posts he can't even delete if he wanted to. So
many of his Google Groups accounts have been banned and he can't get
into them!

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 9:34:41 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 3, 10:50 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 5:44 pm, Enos Penvy <enospe...@ymail.com> wrote:

> > CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR TWO NEW NOMINATIONS, BLOBTARDIA!!!
> > LOL!!!!!!!!!!
>
> Yawn...
>
> Everybody isn't interested

You most likely mean "Not everybody is interested". Of course, we
wouldn't expect YOU to understand the difference between the correct
way to say it, and they way YOU said it.

LOL!

:-))

> in living in your fantasy world of childish
> make believe awards, Faggot. Most of us outgrew that stage years ago.

While you, on the other hand, haven't outgrown it at all.

It was you, after all, who nominated me just a scant few weeks ago!!

Your hypocrisy will never leave you. Seems to be about all you've got
to validate yourself. Rather sad, really.

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 9:37:20 PM11/5/08
to

Oh?! There were CHILDREN posting in alt.support.boy-lovers??? And
the molesters would hit on them in that group? REALLY??????????
Could you link us to just one such exchange? Just one. One post.
One. 1.

Anyway, what you did, effectively, was to disrupt the group (which
could be monitored) to an extent that the people left and are now
doing EXACTLY the same thing UNMONITORED!!

GOOD WORK, BLOBBY!!!!!!!!!!!! Scare the molesters to hide
underground!!

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 10:20:10 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 5:31 pm, Cupid Stunt <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 5, 5:10 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> > On Nov 5, 4:13 pm, Cupid Stunt <cupidst...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Nov 5, 3:40 pm, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Nov 5, 1:36 pm, Emerson Hussein Wainwright
>
> > > > <emersonwainwri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > > > If they were preying on innocent children, you should have
called
> > the
> > > > > authorities.
>
> > > > > Instead, you sent them underground.
>
> > > > They are reported, Faggot.
>
> > > Proof? Evidence? To whom did you report them? Who did you
report?
> > > When?
>
> > > > Bob has reported many of them as i have.
>
> > > How could you know if Bob reported them if you are not Bob?
>
> > Just like the others know that post there, it was posted by Bob,
idiot.
>
> Sooooo................ show us some proof.
>
> :-)
>
> > > > > GOOD WORK, you retarded nitwit!
>
> > Projection #1
>
> Ummm... it is not I who sent the pedophiles underground where they
> can't be monitored.
>
> That would be YOU.
>
> REALLY smart! REALLY!! LOL!!!!
>
> > > Just like Bob did!
>
> > Makes you mad doesn't it??
>
> Not at all. It reveals who you really are inside. It takes your
> credibility from zero to less-than-zero, as even the very few who
> might support you have a bit of a problem with this particular
> behavior of yours.
>
>
>
> > And I can't imagine that there are TWO people who
>
> > > post here who are so vile as to attack an elderly woman
>
> > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>
> > I notice that you keep adding alt.bible and alt.religion.
> > Is that because you "genuinely think the group, or many members
> > of the group, will have an interest in what you're posting"?
>
> Yep. They're as much a part of your campaign as the other groups you
> cross-post to.


You xpost to them, not me, Fag boi.

> Do let's get straight

"Do let's get straight"??

LOL!!!


the fact that YOU are the one
> who started cross-posting. I only posted to two groups before you
> came along. I post to those groups that you post to.
>
> My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will take
> NOTHING you say seriously.

Every group i post to besides the Faggot gloryholes takes me seriously.

>
> You're utterly discredited.

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ


Everywhere. It boggles the mind that a
> man in his 60s,

Proof that i'm in my 60's??

There's no way you could know.

> who pretends to have a grasp on politics and the world
> in general, would have no problem being disbelieved and laughed at at
> every turn.

As i've said, you and the AUK Faggots don't count as everybody

Who, if what you say is true, actually TRIES to come off
> as an idiot!

Keeepe dancing. LOL!!!

alt.bible and alt.religion deleted as they obviously have no interest
in your vulgar comments and homosexual pornography.


Scott Salberg, like Red Dog dick, isn't close to being a good liar but
he persists in trying.


see below:


"Actually, some people at AUK think I'm a rather good troll (and to be
honest, I didn't come to Usenet to disrupt or to be a troll. Except
in the current situation, I really don't crosspost very often, and
when I do, it is because I genuinely think the group, or many members

RedDog

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 10:40:49 PM11/5/08
to

English isn't your forte, I see, Bob. You're to be forgiven for that,
though, being from Indiana near Louisville. :-)

> the fact that YOU are the one
>
> > who started cross-posting. I only posted to two groups before you
> > came along. I post to those groups that you post to.
>
> > My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will take
> > NOTHING you say seriously.
>
> Every group i post to besides the Faggot gloryholes takes me seriously.
>

Fantasize much, do ya? :-)

>
>
> > You're utterly discredited.
>
> ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>
> Everywhere. It boggles the mind that a
>
> > man in his 60s,
>
> Proof that i'm in my 60's??
> There's no way you could know.
>

You're 59.

Nomen Nescio

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 8:10:05 AM11/6/08
to

And as usual you have no one shred of proof to back your lie.
Mr. "usenet tracker" LOL!! You couldn't find Bob and you can't find me.
You should stick to what you know best, harassing innocent usnetizens
in religous ng's, you rancid pile of horseshite.


>
> > the fact that YOU are the one
>
> > > who started cross-posting. I only posted to two groups before you
> > > came along. I post to those groups that you post to.
>
> > > My including certain ng's in these threads ensures that they will
take
> > > NOTHING you say seriously.
>
> > Every group i post to besides the Faggot gloryholes takes me
seriously.
>
> Fantasize much, do ya? :-)
>
>
>
> > > You're utterly discredited.
>
> > ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>
> > Everywhere. It boggles the mind that a
>
> > > man in his 60s,
>
> > Proof that i'm in my 60's??
> > There's no way you could know.
>
> You're 59

Proof?

Of course not!

Guillaume Ier de Normandie

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 9:42:53 PM11/7/08
to
0 new messages