Preaching to the choir is a waste of effort and time.
You must reach the mid-America illiterates, and not
with intellectual appeals.
Mason A. Clark
http://frontal-lobe.info
> I'm finding *nothing* in this group that bears on the election.
> The election will be decided by how many voters will not,
> under any circumstances, put a nigger family in the White House.
> And certainly it will *not* be decided by anyone reading
> intelligent posts on this or any internet group or blog.
Thank God we have you then, to "dumb things down" for the mid-America
illiterates you spoke of. It's not like the illiterates would have been
able to figure out on their own that Obama is black.
"You mean hez black? Kinda light, you sure? Pa looks blacker when he
works on the tractor."
Good thing Palin likes her firearms, nutin hotter then a chick that's
packin...
You are a racist asshole.
I'd put a "nigger" in the White House. I was in favor of Obama a couple of
years ago, but then he actually started talking and I figured out his
positions, now I would not vote for him. It has nothing to do with race, and
everythign to do with socialism.
Idiot.
What makes you use racist terms in your attacks on good Americans? Or,
anybody else for that matter ...
Did you miss the point? I'll try to clarify it for you:
Intelligent Americans will *not* decide this election.
It will be decided by conservatives whose fears include
the fear of black people, even college graduates.
Especially Harvard graduates.
Especially people, black or white, smarter than they are.
This group is an exercise in venting (including me).
It has nothing to do with the election.
Mason A. Clark http://frontal-lobe.info
book: Greater America in the Age of Rebellion
book: The Healing Wisdom of Dr.P.P.Quimby
book: Get Rich in Small Business
book: Homosexuality: Causes and Cures
Galactic Colonization and other flights of Fantasy
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:22:28 -0700, "Jeff Strickland" <cr...@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>>I was in favor of Obama a couple of
>>years ago, but then he actually started talking and I figured out his
>>positions, now I would not vote for him. It has nothing to do with race,
>>and everythign to do with socialism.
>
> What's funneling billions to the wealth and corporate class called in your
> silly universe, Jeffy?
Bush, neocons, and their corporate handlers. It's a blatant plundering of
the Treasury in the same mold used to enter Iraq and the "Patriot Act."
Terrorism by our own leaders scaring an ignorant, trusting, public.
--
Regards, Curly
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Bush Doctrine: Privatize Profits, Socialize Losses
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
>>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<
-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
I wouldn't put him in TODAY, but I gave him serious consideration two years
ago.
When the wealth and corporate class stop providing jobs, we'll talk about
giving them tax incentives to provide jobs.
Yes, he (Obama) is a socialist. Socialism is bad.
> The "other" party does not.
>
Yes, they are NOT socialists. That's good.
Obama is a died-in-the-wool socialist hiding behind social injustice.
Beware.
Personally, I've grown up knowing that life aint fair. I really don't give a
rat's ass about social injustice. Sorry to let you down. I do care about
socialism though, and I know socialism will not cure social injustice.
Oops, that's DYED, not died.
Come on! You, of all people, know that social injustice is not cured by
socialist and/or socialism ideals.
I'm being kind by calling Obama a socialist, he's borderline communist if
you look at his friends, and at some of the crap he says.
I'm a small business, and he scares the shit out of me because as soon as I
make my next dime, he's going to be standing there looking for 7 cents.