The anchor holding back McCain's ship has been lifted.
Anchors Away !
Is she qualified to be President? No. Beside the point.
It's a political campaign.
Mason A. Clark http://frontal-lobe.info
book: Greater America in the Age of Rebellion
You are right. The liberal pinheads put the bar so low, and Palin was so far
above that she exceeded all expectations. On the other side, Biden, was in
fact OK, but the expectation was higher than he achieved, so he lost.
As far as being qualified to be President, which she is not directly running
for, I saw that in short time, she will be qualified, because she is a quick
learner, and has solid values. On the other side, Obama is not qualified to
be President. Obama is a very good orator, and is very qualified to be a
preacher, and that is the skill set he brings to the table. There have been
others before, that were not qualified, also.
> "Mason C" <maso...@XXXfrontal-lobe.info> wrote in message
> news:ibfbe418tfqfbssle...@4ax.com...
>> Sarah Palin won, hands down. Because she didn't *lose*
>>
>> The anchor holding back McCain's ship has been lifted.
>>
>> Anchors Away !
>>
>> Is she qualified to be President? No. Beside the point.
>>
>> It's a political campaign.
>>
>>
>> Mason A. Clark http://frontal-lobe.info book: Greater America in the
>> Age of Rebellion
>
> You are right. The liberal pinheads put the bar so low, and Palin was so
> far above that she exceeded all expectations. On the other side, Biden,
> was in fact OK, but the expectation was higher than he achieved, so he
> lost.
>
> As far as being qualified to be President, which she is not directly
> running for, I saw that in short time, she will be qualified, because
> she is a quick learner, and has solid values.
Well this explains a lot. You have no idea what it takes to be president.
> On the other side, Obama
> is not qualified to be President. Obama is a very good orator, and is
> very qualified to be a preacher, and that is the skill set he brings to
> the table. There have been others before, that were not qualified, also.
IN short: Obama is a leader and Palin isn't. "quick learner" is not a
qualification for the office of president. Oratory skills, the ability
to ignite passion, and the ability to reason and decide are presidential
qualifications. McCain has the ability to memorize and repeat talking
points and he delivers his lines very well indeed. In that way is is a
duplicate of George Bush. Bush was a better actor than Reagan ever was,
and McCain isn't as good at it.
The proper criterion incorporates whether the response of the candidate was right or wrong in respect to the policy of the issue in question. In these 2008 presidential debates that should be the criteria on which you premise your vote for either presidency.
I majored in television broadcasting and television production therefore it was obvious to me that the response scriptwriters and the producers and directors of Governor Palin's television acting performance was a success. This was after all a political TV production on the part of the McCain-Bush/Palin campaign managers and “she won the barracuda Lipstick-Pit-Bull trophy.”
Governor Palin's television production crew could have taken any good actor who believed in the Republican philosophy and ideology and produced a performance equal to that of Governor Palin's performance. You don't have to know the issues in depth to perform a political character role in what is termed a debate, which however is actually a television production on the part of a candidate who has not had many years of experience in foreign-policy issues.
The political one-liners are only effective if they comport to reality. For example, saying that if we raise the white flag of defeat and if we set a timeline to quit our occupation of Iraq in a responsible way, that does not comport with the reality of the situation. When a president and commander-in-chief invades a sovereign Islamic country that is not an imminent threat that constitutes an unwise self-defeating decision that can never end in victory.
<>Modern military actions are antithetical to pro-life and right to life, science tells us that when depleted uranium is added to that equation your military actions become anti-pro-life and anti-right to life for at least a half billion years.Military actions must conform to international law, they must be justified and there must be limited targeting only of what absolutely has to be taken out. Deadly, self-destructive and self-defeating military actions do not represent the resource that can be effectively used toward a pathway of peace and mutual prosperity for America and the world. We must identify the real enemies of effective human and country communication relationships.
<>All forms of unrighteousness and injustice represent the true enemies of world peace and mutual prosperity. We live in an interdependent world of countries and peoples we cannot survive standing alone or warring against each other. There is a path to peace and mutual prosperity but it must adhere to the principles of truth righteousness and justice that lead to peace and mutual prosperity. The difference between right & wrong is many trillions of dollars & millions of lives lost. - udarrell-- WISDOM PRINCIPLED EMPOWERMENT COMMUNICATIONS - THE REAL POLITICAL ISSUES & WISDOM Principled PEOPLE EMPOWERMENT http://www.udarrell.com/ (Updated) Pro Life/Right To Life - That's Obama MY OBAMA BLOG: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/darrelludelhoven "The most pathetic person in the world is someone who has sight but has no vision." - Helen Keller "Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds" - Albert Einstein "REALITY Is Not An Easy Thing To Be Confronted With, or to ACCEPT." - Darrell U