Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Fort Hood shows what an emphatic grip political correctness has on the USA

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Robert Henderson

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 3:22:14 PM11/9/09
to

"Telegraph

Fort Hood gunman had told US military colleagues that infidels should
have their throats cut .

Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America's Fort Hood
military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said
non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their
throats. "

Note: The vice-like grip which political correctness has on the US (and
Britain is arguably even more in thrall to this totalitarian creed) can
never have been more emphatically illustrated than in the Fort Hood
killings. Short of Hassan going around with a tattoo on his forehead
saying "I am an Islamic terrorist who wishes the US harm" he could not
have done anything more to signal what he was and what he was likely, in
some form, to do, namely, attack something he perceived as being
emblematic of the US state.

Obama's astonishing tepid reaction is only astonishing to those who have
not taken the trouble to read and digest Dreams, from My Father. That
book unwittingly tells the reader that Obama is a virulent anti-white
racist, possessed of a deeply ingrained victimhood which drives him to
see every fault displayed by non-whites as the consequence of white
oppression and a category A fantasist (or pathological liar if you like)
which allows him to readily shape the world for his own emotional
comfort. He must also be aware that he was elected by capturing a
soviet-style proportion of the ethnic minority vote and will need them
again if he stands for re-election.

Those considerations would be reason enough for him to be reluctant to
offer criticism which had non-white ethnic or racial implications. But
the book also shows Obama as something else. Despite his grotesque
fantasising and his ownership of an ego which would do service to a five
year old (he clearly believes the entire world revolves around him), in
DFMF Obama presents as a vague, bloodless personality. Thus it is no
surprise that he falls badly short when he needs to project emotion.

Despite his seemingly dispassionate front, Obama is a very nervous
personality when he is in public. If you want to see how nervous he is,
record him when he is under some pressure. Then play back the recording
in slow motion, the slower the better. If it is slow enough you will see
what are called micro-expressions. These are fleeting expressions which
are at best only perceived subliminally if at all at normal speed.
Obama's micro-expressions are of high anxiety whenever he is faced with
any critical questioning or the situation suggests that is what is going
to happen. Interestingly, he shares this characteristic with Blair. I
suspect both fell for the same mistake: being child-like egotists they
wanted the highest political position for the ego trip. When they got
there they found the trip wasn't to their liking. RH


--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk

Mike Ross

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 3:46:48 PM11/9/09
to
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:22:14 +0000, Robert Henderson
<phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Fort Hood gunman had told US military colleagues that infidels should
>have their throats cut .
>
>Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America's Fort Hood
>military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he said
>non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down their
>throats. "


>Note: The vice-like grip which political correctness has on the US (and
>Britain is arguably even more in thrall to this totalitarian creed) can
>never have been more emphatically illustrated than in the Fort Hood
>killings. Short of Hassan going around with a tattoo on his forehead
>saying "I am an Islamic terrorist who wishes the US harm" he could not
>have done anything more to signal what he was and what he was likely, in
>some form, to do, namely, attack something he perceived as being
>emblematic of the US state.

<snip>

1. I don't buy that; if the guy was a terrorist - especially a sleeper-type
terrorist (and he would have to have been a very sound sleeper to serve in the
Army as long as he did - he rose to Major, remember) - then he would bloody well
have done more damage than shooting some people with handguns, and/or picked a
higher-value target!

2. Given the above, I think he wasn't a terrorist in the real sense of the word,
just another disaffected mass-shooting nutter, fueled by a combination of
disloyalty, mental illness, and Islam.

3. What the heck does any of this have to do with uk.legal?

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

FrereTuck

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 4:07:23 PM11/9/09
to

who benefits might not be immediately apparent unless you are a cynic...

essentially its more 'why we fight'... 'evil nazis' for you....

that is to say, who's making all the dough off weapons and ammo?

the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
possibility of it being a points scoring attack...

seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....

bunch of 'insignificant' dead... really no-one important harmed... arms
trade as usual.... the most point scoringest seems to be the preggers
woman... not something any self respecting 'religious' person would boast
about surely... pregnant with the infidels child!?...

Roger Dewhurst

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 4:19:51 PM11/9/09
to

When Obozo farts the thunder is heard in Whitehall.

R

abelard

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 4:57:29 PM11/9/09
to
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:23 GMT, FrereTuck <no...@invalid.com> wrote:

>On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 15:46:48 -0500, Mike Ross wrote:
>

>> 3. What the heck does any of this have to do with uk.legal?

a great deal in view of the cross border nature of these problems

>who benefits might not be immediately apparent unless you are a cynic...
>
>essentially its more 'why we fight'... 'evil nazis' for you....
>
>that is to say, who's making all the dough off weapons and ammo?
>
>the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
>possibility of it being a points scoring attack...
>
>seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....

the 'rank' is almost certainly not a 'normal'/genuine rank...
but a nominal rank to adjust his pay grade as 'appropriate'
to a medic


--
web site at www.abelard.org - news comment service, logic, economics
energy, education, politics, etc over 1 million document calls in year past
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
all that is necessary for [] walk quietly and carry
the triumph of evil is that [] a big stick.
good people do nothing [] trust actions not words
only when it's funny -- roger rabbit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

abelard

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:06:42 PM11/9/09
to
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 20:22:14 +0000, Robert Henderson
<phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:


>Obama's micro-expressions are of high anxiety whenever he is faced with
>any critical questioning or the situation suggests that is what is going
>to happen. Interestingly, he shares this characteristic with Blair. I
>suspect both fell for the same mistake: being child-like egotists they
>wanted the highest political position for the ego trip. When they got
>there they found the trip wasn't to their liking. RH

agree with 99% of your post...but not the comparison
with bliar....
bliar is more vain than ego bound....he is also much more
reality grounded...
bliar is much less of a fantasist, though they are both
heavily tainted by the cult dogmas obarmy is much
more of a brain-washed zombie...
bliar is a mediocre failed wannabe pop star....

obarmy is earning his disparagingly nickname, 'the anointed one'

bliar never showed any signs of really believing the bollox

regards

William Black

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:16:10 PM11/9/09
to
abelard wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:23 GMT, FrereTuck <no...@invalid.com> wrote:


>> the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
>> possibility of it being a points scoring attack...
>>
>> seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....
>
> the 'rank' is almost certainly not a 'normal'/genuine rank...
> but a nominal rank to adjust his pay grade as 'appropriate'
> to a medic

That's a very German assumption.

Officers in the US Army do not get promoted to make sure they get the
appropriate remuneration, for that they get special allowances, just
the same as in the British army.

He'll have been a major because that's the rank his job requires.

Medical officers in armies do not just practice medicine.


--
William Black

"Any number under six"

The answer given by Englishman Richard Peeke when asked by the Duke of
Medina Sidonia how many Spanish sword and buckler men he could beat
single handed with a quarterstaff.

abelard

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:31:59 PM11/9/09
to
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:16:10 +0000, William Black
<willia...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

>abelard wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:23 GMT, FrereTuck <no...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
>>> possibility of it being a points scoring attack...
>>>
>>> seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....
>>
>> the 'rank' is almost certainly not a 'normal'/genuine rank...
>> but a nominal rank to adjust his pay grade as 'appropriate'
>> to a medic
>
>That's a very German assumption.
>
>Officers in the US Army do not get promoted to make sure they get the
>appropriate remuneration, for that they get special allowances, just
>the same as in the British army.

you are incorrect concerning the uk military....

hey, that's a surprise!

>He'll have been a major because that's the rank his job requires.
>
>Medical officers in armies do not just practice medicine.

yeah, c'mon tell us, they lead one or two hundred soldiers
into battle

Roger Dewhurst

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:35:30 PM11/9/09
to
William Black wrote:
> abelard wrote:
>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:23 GMT, FrereTuck <no...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
>>> possibility of it being a points scoring attack...
>>>
>>> seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....
>>
>> the 'rank' is almost certainly not a 'normal'/genuine rank...
>> but a nominal rank to adjust his pay grade as 'appropriate'
>> to a medic
>
> That's a very German assumption.
>
> Officers in the US Army do not get promoted to make sure they get the
> appropriate remuneration, for that they get special allowances, just
> the same as in the British army.

Neither have Sergeant doctors!!!!!!!!!!

Bert Hyman

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 6:55:55 PM11/9/09
to
In news:3TsM6Dr2...@anywhere.demon.co.uk Robert Henderson
<phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:

> Fort Hood gunman had told US military colleagues that infidels should
> have their throats cut .
>
> Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the gunman who killed 13 at America's Fort
> Hood military base, once gave a lecture to other doctors in which he
> said non-believers should be beheaded and have boiling oil poured down
> their throats. "
>

Sorry, but claims of PC reluctance to report such statements won't wash.

If these folks simply felt uneasy because the good doctor was a Muslim,
they'd have been correct to refrain from reporting their own biases.

Statements like those related above, if they were actually made, should
have been reported immediately and would have been acted on.

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN be...@iphouse.com

William Black

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 7:50:53 PM11/9/09
to
abelard wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 22:16:10 +0000, William Black
> <willia...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> abelard wrote:
>>> On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:07:23 GMT, FrereTuck <no...@invalid.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> the lack of high ranking officer victims seems to diminish the
>>>> possibility of it being a points scoring attack...
>>>>
>>>> seriously... the 'major' was the highest rank in the pack....
>>> the 'rank' is almost certainly not a 'normal'/genuine rank...
>>> but a nominal rank to adjust his pay grade as 'appropriate'
>>> to a medic
>> That's a very German assumption.
>>
>> Officers in the US Army do not get promoted to make sure they get the
>> appropriate remuneration, for that they get special allowances, just
>> the same as in the British army.
>
> you are incorrect concerning the uk military....

Do tell


>
> hey, that's a surprise!
>
>> He'll have been a major because that's the rank his job requires.
>>
>> Medical officers in armies do not just practice medicine.
>
> yeah, c'mon tell us, they lead one or two hundred soldiers
> into battle
>

Arsehole...

Robert Henderson

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 3:21:37 AM11/10/09
to
In message <hdaddn$6qa$6...@news.eternal-september.org>, William Black
<willia...@hotmail.co.uk> writes

>>
>>> He'll have been a major because that's the rank his job requires.
>>>
>>> Medical officers in armies do not just practice medicine.
>> yeah, c'mon tell us, they lead one or two hundred soldiers
>> into battle
>>
>
>Arsehole...
>
>--
Nope, "Abelard" is a vintage 1947 valve computer from the Bonkers 9000
range. RH

Mr X

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 4:15:58 AM11/10/09
to

"abelard" <abel...@abelard.org> wrote in message
news:ae5hf5lr9e483u014...@4ax.com...

>>Officers in the US Army do not get promoted to make sure they get the
>>appropriate remuneration, for that they get special allowances, just
>>the same as in the British army.
>
> you are incorrect concerning the uk military....
>
Medics in the UK army are paid more than other officers of the same rank.
That is beacuse their pay must be at least that of an NHS doctor of similar
standing.


abelard

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 7:48:21 AM11/10/09
to
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 08:21:37 +0000, Robert Henderson
<phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:

>In message <hdaddn$6qa$6...@news.eternal-september.org>, William Black
><willia...@hotmail.co.uk> writes
>>>
>>>> He'll have been a major because that's the rank his job requires.
>>>>
>>>> Medical officers in armies do not just practice medicine.
>>> yeah, c'mon tell us, they lead one or two hundred soldiers
>>> into battle

>>Arsehole...

>, "Abelard" is a vintage 1947 valve computer from the Bonkers 9000
>range. RH

that was his sig line!!

don't you hastands know anything about computers?

regards

Robert Henderson

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 8:28:33 AM11/10/09
to
In message <d6oif5hucde7ulnqc...@4ax.com>, abelard
<abel...@abelard.org> writes

>
>>, "Abelard" is a vintage 1947 valve computer from the Bonkers 9000
>>range. RH
>
>that was his sig line!!
>
>don't you hastands know anything about computers?
>
>regards


We know plenty about the hilarious limitations of the 1947 Bonkers 9000
series.... RH

0 new messages