Funding row over new Forth Road Bridge
Robert Henderson
Telegraph
Funding row over new Forth Road Bridge
SNP ministers have been challenged to detail how they will pay for the
new Forth Road Bridge after publishing legislation giving the project
the go-ahead.
By Simon Johnson, Scottish Political Editor
Published: 11:51AM GMT 18 Nov 2009
The Forth Crossing Bill states Scottish ministers will fund the bridge
using traditional means, by finding the money from their capital
budgets. However, with public spending set to be severely squeezed in
the aftermath of the recession, there is no indication where SNP
ministers will the cost of up to �2.3 billion.
Note: Guess who they want to pay for it.... Quite unfit to rule
themselves.
RESERVATIONS NOW!
RH
--
Robert Henderson
Personal website: http://www.anywhere.demon.co.uk
Paul C
<phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>
>Telegraph
>Funding row over new Forth Road Bridge
>SNP ministers have been challenged to detail how they will pay for the
>new Forth Road Bridge after publishing legislation giving the project
>the go-ahead.
>By Simon Johnson, Scottish Political Editor
>Published: 11:51AM GMT 18 Nov 2009
>
>The Forth Crossing Bill states Scottish ministers will fund the bridge
>using traditional means, by finding the money from their capital
>budgets. However, with public spending set to be severely squeezed in
>the aftermath of the recession, there is no indication where SNP
>ministers will the cost of up to �2.3 billion.
>
>
>Note: Guess who they want to pay for it.
Who do they want to pay for it, and do you have a source for your
answer?
By the way we are paying for your London Olympics - and that IS a
fact.
GM
> Robert Henderson <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:GL4A8
> +cbpCBLF...@anywhere.demon.co.uk:
>
> > Note: Guess who they want to pay for it....
>
And Waterloo Station, and the Heathrow Rail Link, and the London
Underground, and Wemberly and..., and...
GMc
Paul C
wrote:
the London Weighting paid to failed civil servants like Rab.
Robert Peffers
"Paul C" <pa...@thersgb.net> wrote in message
news:h6b8g5ti4ug2t485j...@4ax.com...
Tell you what though if the bridge was over the River Thames do you think
there would be any doubt about how it would be funded - or by whom?
--
Auld Bob
Robert Peffers
"soupdragon" <m...@privacy.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9CC7B34ED...@62.141.42.83...> +cbpCB...@anywhere.demon.co.uk:
>
>
>> Note: Guess who they want to pay for it....
>
>
>
more he cannot fathom that there is no such thing as English funding on the
books of GB.& Co.
--
Auld Bob
Robert Peffers
"GM" <g-...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:220461ee-836c-4549...@j24g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
funding that is only for England as everyone else funds transport from
within their block grant.
--
Auld Bob
Magnus
Oh, we do have reservations, but mainly about your sanity.
Robert Henderson
<peff...@btinternet.com> writes
>>>Note: Guess who they want to pay for it.
>>
>> Who do they want to pay for it, and do you have a source for your
>> answer?
>>
>> By the way we are paying for your London Olympics - and that IS a
>> fact.
>He is so predictable.
>Tell you what though if the bridge was over the River Thames do you
>think there would be any doubt about how it would be funded - or by
>whom?
>--
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>Robert Henderson <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:GL4A8
>+cbpCB...@anywhere.demon.co.uk:
>
>
>
>
>
Robert Henderson
<peff...@btinternet.com> writes
>As usual the idiot cannot differentiate between Britain and England.
Indeed you can't, Auld Bob Senilers... RH
Paul C
<sound of tumbleweed>
Halmyre
> Robert Henderson <phi...@anywhere.demon.co.uk> wrote in news:GL4A8
I don't have any reservations about his sanity...
--
Halmyre
Robert Henderson
<also....@nowhere.com> writes
>> The Forth Crossing Bill states Scottish ministers will fund the bridge
>> using traditional means, by finding the money from their capital
>> budgets. However, with public spending set to be severely squeezed in
>> the aftermath of the recession, there is no indication where SNP
>> ministers will the cost of up to �2.3 billion.
>>
>>
>> Note: Guess who they want to pay for it.... Quite unfit to rule
>> themselves.
>>
>> RESERVATIONS NOW!
>>
>> RH
>>
>
>Oh, we do have reservations, but mainly about your sanity.
Mmmmmmm....I wonder if fantasy Celts should be put in the
reservations... RH
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>>
>>
>>> Note: Guess who they want to pay for it....
>>>
>>>The same people London wanted to pay for Crossrail and the Dome, perhaps?
>>>
>>>
>> That'll be the English then... RH
>
>kept you in benefits for the last 18 odd years.
Do stop projecting, soupcreature.... RH
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>The same people London wanted to pay for Crossrail and the Dome,
>>>>>perhaps?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> That'll be the English then... RH
>>>
>>>No. That'll be the British taxpayer, Fatboi. The same people who've
>>>kept you in benefits for the last 18 odd years.
>>
>>
>> Do stop projecting, soupcreature.... RH
>
>you've been a workshy, benefits scrounger for that same period. Nope.
>No projecting from me Fatso.
Every Scotchman (and by extension every fantasy Celt) lives off the
English taxpayer, soupcreature... RH
Robert Peffers
>>>>>kept you in benefits for the last 18 odd years.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do stop projecting, soupcreature.... RH
>>>
>>>Projecting? Let's see, I've had a job for the last 18 years, whilst
>>>you've been a workshy, benefits scrounger for that same period. Nope.
>>>No projecting from me Fatso.
>>
>>
>> Every Scotchman (and by extension every fantasy Celt) lives off the
>> English taxpayer, soupcreature... RH
>
The idiot has been claiming that for years but is so bloody stupid that he
has never been able to either explain it or give a citation.
Conclusive proof he is a couple of cards short of a full deck.
--
Auld Bob
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>>>>
>>>> Do stop projecting, soupcreature.... RH
>>>
>>>Projecting? Let's see, I've had a job for the last 18 years, whilst
>>>you've been a workshy, benefits scrounger for that same period. Nope.
>>>No projecting from me Fatso.
>>
>>
>> Every Scotchman (and by extension every fantasy Celt) lives off the
>> English taxpayer, soupcreature... RH
>
Indeed you have evaded it, soupcreature. Now, about those massive
English subsidies to Scotchland... RH
Robert Peffers
>
>> In message <Xns9CC9A6119...@62.141.42.83>, soupdragon
>> <m...@privacy.com> writes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do stop projecting, soupcreature.... RH
>>>>>
>>>>>Projecting? Let's see, I've had a job for the last 18 years, whilst
>>>>>you've been a workshy, benefits scrounger for that same period.
> Nope.
>>>>>No projecting from me Fatso.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Every Scotchman (and by extension every fantasy Celt) lives off the
>>>> English taxpayer, soupcreature... RH
>>>
>>>Evasion of point noted.
>>
>> Indeed
>
> regarding your many years living off the British taxpayer.
Do you think there is any danger that one day the numptie will come up with
some evidence to prove his claims?
That is besides his present daft attempt at stealing Scottish territory by
redrawing the international borders?
--
Auld Bob
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>many years living off
. the English taxpayer, since 1707 to be exact in the case of the
Scotch..
Robert Henderson
<peff...@btinternet.com> writes
>>> Indeed
>>
>> Nice of you to admit to it, not that we hadn't noticed your snip and run
>> regarding your many years living off the British taxpayer.
>Do you think there is any danger that one day the numptie will come up
>with some evidence to prove his claims? That is besides his present
>daft attempt at stealing Scottish territory by redrawing the
>international borders?
Don't fret, Auld Bob Senilers, the reservations will be set up soon...
Robert Henderson
<m...@privacy.com> writes
>Yes
Glad to see you agreed with the fact of the Scotch living off the
English taxpayer, since 1707 ....
GM
wrote:
> In message <Xns9CCB9F0C4FF1Bdarev...@62.141.42.83>, soupdragon
> <m...@privacy.com> writes
>
> >Yes
>
> Glad to see you agreed with the fact of the Scotch living off the
> English taxpayer, since 1707 ....
> RH
> --
If you look at the post you will note that is not what he stated.
Do stop trolling.
GMc
Robert Peffers
Do stop trolling.
GMc
Why do you bother with the numptie?
He just repeats, ad nauseam, the same old unsupported claims.
In all the many years the idiot has posted those untrue things he has never
once posted a credible citation in support of any of hid claims.
The closest he ever got to a citation was to cite an article from, If memory
serves well, the Telegraph.
However, when you went to read his citation it did no more than what he,
Henderson, had done.
Made an unsubstantiated statement as if it was an act of faith.
What is even more incredible is the number of times, almost, every regular
poster has demolished Henderson's factitious claims with rock solid facts,
citations and valid arguments.
Next post Henderson just makes yet another unsubstantiated claim.
Why on Earth do you bother?
Of course the group idiot will now either sink to the level of Ad hominem or
launch into his own particular mentally ill version of medical fantasy.
--
Auld Bob
Robert Henderson
<c3397516-45fb-490a...@m11g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>, GM
<g-...@hotmail.co.uk> writes
>stop trolling
Indeed you should.... RH