African murders white 'girlfriend' to death #499
Love Europe, Hate the EU
An inquest jury has criticised social services and Warwickshire police
after a woman was killed by her ex-partner.
Colette Lynch, 24, died in 2005 after being stabbed outside her home
in Rugby, just days after calling police with concerns about Percy
Wright. She told police she needed urgent help after he threatened
her.
Ms Lynch was later stabbed through the chest by Wright as he held
their young child on 5 February.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/8420610.stm
Andy
Lou Ravi
Murdered to death eh? Well that's pretty unusual.
bigot_cretin
> Love Europe, Hate the EU wrote:
>
> Murdered to death eh? Well that's pretty unusual.
Reminds me of that disinfectant that used to kill 99% of all household
germs DEAD.
FACE
Europe, Hate the EU" <eu...@yahoo.co.uk>, wrote
Well, you got your normal garden variety murder and then you got the more
serious "murder to death". It's important to know the difference and make
the distinction when called for...............
euno...@yahoo.com.au
wrote:
> http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/10/06/article-1218528-0492DE61000...
>
> An inquest jury has criticised social services and Warwickshire police
> after a woman was killed by her ex-partner.
>
> in Rugby, just days after calling police with concerns about Percy
> Wright. She told police she needed urgent help after he threatened
> her.
>
> their young child on 5 February.
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/coventry_warwickshire/8420610.stm
You have to wonder what a pretty 25 year old White woman was doing
having relationship let alone a child with a hideously ugly 37 year
old Black man?
She was obviously an fool though I do feel sorry for her. It's a
pitty it wasn't a murder suicide. Immagine the child?
Hopefully her example will serve as a sober warning for other White
girls that have been deluded by multicultural propaganda into
overcomming their own inhibitions and common sense. Blacks have a
extra-ordinarily relative high crime rate, poorer family stabillity
and a relationship will tend to be more short lived, rocky,
disappointing. It is obviously more likely to end in violence as this
one did.
You can see a photograph of murderer "Percy Wright" in his no doubt
typical repose here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1218528/Young-mother-stabbed-death-police-ignored-warning-killer-posed-threat.html
Apparently he's goiing to get out in 3 years. I wonder if he had of
been white or even the victim black if such lenience would have been
shown? I doubt it. It would have been another Steven Lawrence case.
Hyped to the hilt.
1 Blacks in both the UK and USA have 8 times the violent crime rate of
Whites. This is confirmed not only by conviction statistics but by
the 'victims of crime survey' that is instituted to determin if a
crime was a racial bias crime.
2 Blacks have a lower IQ, even in 2nd and 3rd generations (85 and 91
or so for US and UK).
3 Interestingly for the same IQ a Black still has at least twice the
crime rate of a White.
One reason for this appears to be a lower “socially prescribed impulse
control" ie the abillity to restrain oneself.
(the classic test is to give a candy treat to a child and tell it that
the longer it waits before eating it the more it will get)
If interested at looking at this scientifically, these two papers can
be illuminationg:
http://www.solargeneral.com/library/race-evolution-behavior.pdf
http://www.theoccidentalquarterly.com/archives/vol6no4/MacDonald.pdf
http://www.springerlink.com/content/97lkr63empuymwle/
http://www.springerlink.com/content/mqcxawk4twk2g45f/
This example indicates, IQ is a critically important mechanism that
involves explicit processing. However, another important explicit
processing
mechanism is the personality system of Conscientiousness, which will
be the
focus of this paper.4 Conscientiousness refers to “socially prescribed
impulse
control”—that is, the ability to control one’s behavior to conform to
social
conventions and to pursue long-term goals.5 Conscientious people are
able to
delay gratifi cation and to perform diffi cult, unpleasant tasks in
pursuit of their
goals. In general, they behave in a responsible, dependable, and
cooperative
manner.
Conscientiousness is often labeled effortful control. This emphasizes
the
fact that Conscientiousness involves explicit, conscious processes.
Simply put,
conscientious people try hard. In a test of this trait for children,
the experimenter
places a piece of candy on a child’s tongue and asks him to not
swallow until
instructed to do so. Or the experimenter asks the child not to peek at
a gift
until the experimenter returns. For most fi ve-year-olds, these are
really hard
things to do, because their natural tendency is to swallow the candy
and look
at the gift. In general, girls are more conscientious than boys, and
of course
Conscientiousness increases with age.
It’s not surprising that being low on Conscientiousness is a huge risk
factor
in modern life. Such people do poorly in school and on the job. They
are more
likely to become impulsive criminals—criminals whose crimes are due to
lack
Winter 2006-2007 / MacDonald 13
of impulse control: murderers who can’t control their temper, drug
abusers
who can’t control their cravings, or rapists who can’t control their
lust.
Notice that being conscientious means that we are better able to
control our
natural tendencies. Five-year-olds who manage to not peek at the
present or eat
the candy before the experimenter’s okay have to overcome powerful
natural
urges. We all have a natural attraction to the pleasures of drugs like
cocaine
(which mimic natural reinforcers) and the attractions of sexual
desire. Most
of us have had fantasies in which we imagine murdering a rival or
enemy.6
These tendencies are very adaptive, because they motivate us to seek
mates
and other resources and to move up the social hierarchy.
But conscientious people can control these urges in order take account
of the
wider context (for example, going to prison for murder, or becoming a
dysfunctional
drug addict). They don’t allow their urges to interfere with long-term
goals
(such as inhibiting the desire to party in order to get a good
education).
Neurobiological research shows quite clearly how this works. The
prefrontal
cortex is the seat of conscientiousness. It has inhibitory connections
to subcortical
regions of the brain responsible for our natural urges (drugs, sex,
and
rock–and roll, as I tell my students). The subcortical parts of the
brain process
information implicitly, and they are evolutionarily ancient. The
prefrontal
cortex processes information explicitly and is the crowning
achievement of
human evolution.
Consider one of evolutionary psychologist David Buss’s examples. A man
is almost run over by a car; he responds by directing an obscene
gesture at
the car. The car stops and men get out and beat him. Suffering the
pain and
humiliation of being beaten enrages the man, and he responds by
getting his
gun: “I had stone hatred for him, and I righteously couldn’t wait to
see the
look on his face when I blew him away. As soon as he popped out of the
liquor
store door, I charged right up to him, rammed the barrel in his chest,
and
pulled the trigger.”7 This is an example of impulsive aggression—the
man is
overwhelmed by rage stemming from his subcortex. It is a natural, refl
exive
reaction. His prefrontal cortex is pretty much out of the loop.
If this man had a stronger Conscientiousness system, things might have
happened quite differently. The prefrontal cortex takes in information
about
the wider context of our behavior, and it analyzes the situation
explicitly. The
subcortical brain is responding in a refl exive, impulsive, angry
manner, and the
only context it is sensitive to is the fact that another person has
infl icted pain.
But a person with a strong PFC is able to control these urges, and
take account
of the wider context. Such a person doesn’t simply respond with
impulsive
aggression; he thinks about the big picture: If I kill this guy, will
I get caught?
If I kill him with a gun, does it have a serial number that can be
traced? Is there
any possibility of DNA evidence being left at the scene? If I do get
caught, can I
plea-bargain it down to manslaughter? Will his friends come and get
revenge?
Why not just call 911 and let the police deal with the beating?