They're still at it.
The Rock
be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and the
country along with him.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091213/ap_on_bi_ge/us_congress_spending
The Democratic-controlled Senate voted 60-34 on Saturday to end the GOP
filibuster
that threatened to hold up the legislation. The final vote would send the
measure to President Barack Obama.
The 1,000-plus-page bill brings together six of the 12 annual spending bills
that Congress had been unable
to pass separately because of partisan roadblocks even though the current
budget year began Oct. 1.
The measure pays for Medicare and Medicaid benefits, and boosts spending for
the Education Department,
the State Department, the Department of Health and Human Services and
others.
--
www.lightningnews.com Lightning fast anonymous usenet downloads for 5$ only !
babeejm
>I guess we should be grateful there won't be any government shutdown.
When can we expect O go to back to work though?..Enough with traveling
the world.
Cicero Venatio
> The Republicans are still trying to block every legislation so nothing will
> be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and the
> country along with him.
Bush signed that same legislation every year, to fund all that worthless
activity. Never saw a dime from those budget deals, and never will, so
who gives a sh*t.
Buerste
"The Rock" <neve...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4b25471a$0$27495$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
> The Republicans are still trying to block every legislation so nothing
> will
> be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and the
> country along with him.
The failure of Obammy's radical agenda is GOOD for the country.
Eddie Haskell
"The Rock" <neve...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4b25471a$0$27495$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
> will
> be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and the
> country along with him.
Despite the LIES Harry Reid and the democrats tell you, the republicans
don't have the votes to block anything. The hold up on healthcare reform is
on the part of blue dog DEMOCRATS, you stupid brainwashed idiot.
Oh, and Rush said that he wants Hussein to fail because he wants America to
survive, DUMBASS.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"Buerste" <bue...@wowway.com> wrote in message
news:0htVm.106068$gg6....@newsfe25.iad...
Exactly.
-Eddie Haskell
The Rock
"Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
news:4b26651a$0$1632$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
No wonder you can't think, you listen to the crap Rush puts out.
You righturds keep on voting for the palins of the party of NO, and we've
seen
what you did to the country, fools.
--
I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
The Rock
"babeejm" <jmts...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:7e2996ea-3e05-44cd...@j19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
He has to travel the world to repair the damage done by Bush.
--
I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
--
www.lightningnews.com Lightning fast anonymous usenet downloads for 5$ only !
Eddie Haskell
>
>
> "Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
> news:4b26651a$0$1632$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
>>
>> "The Rock" <neve...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:4b25471a$0$27495$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
>>> The Republicans are still trying to block every legislation so nothing
>>> will
>>> be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and
>>> the
>>> country along with him.
>>
>> Despite the LIES Harry Reid and the democrats tell you, the republicans
>> don't have the votes to block anything. The hold up on healthcare reform
>> is on the part of blue dog DEMOCRATS, you stupid brainwashed idiot.
>>
>> Oh, and Rush said that he wants Hussein to fail because he wants America
>> to survive, DUMBASS.
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>
> No wonder you can't think, you listen to the crap Rush puts out.
> You righturds keep on voting for the palins of the party of NO, and we've
> seen
> what you did to the country, fools.
You parrot your bullshit DNC talking points real good, moron.
> I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
Sarah Palin didn't say that. Tina Fay said that is a SNL skit, moron.
Damn, you fuckers are brainwashed simpletons... ROTFLMAO!
Here, now take a look in the mirror.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8
-Eddie Haskell
MACK DADDY
> "Buerste" <buer...@wowway.com> wrote in message
>
> news:0htVm.106068$gg6....@newsfe25.iad...
>
>
>
> > "The Rock" <neverm...@nospam.com> wrote in message
> >news:4b25471a$0$27495$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
> >> The Republicans are still trying to block every legislation so nothing
> >> will
> >> be done in the country. They're bend on making this President fail and
> >> the
> >> country along with him.
> > <snip>
>
> > The failure of Obammy's radical agenda is GOOD for the country.
>
> Exactly.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
You're so racist!
Eddie Haskell
"MACK DADDY" <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:5ddac30f-293b-4b6d...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> You're so racist!
"Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
MACK DADDY, never living it down.
-Eddie Haskell
MACK DADDY
> "MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Clinton was impeached in the house, but not in the senate. An
impeachment is not complete unless it happens in both houses of
congress you stupid communist illiterate!
The Rock
"Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
news:4b267dda$0$10945$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
I feel sorry for you Eddie, you couldn't find anything but a right winger
video putting some people that don't watch the news or are ill informed
and label them Obama voters. Typical of Rove tactics. You're the brainwashed
one, like all right wingers, believing that President Obama is a communist,
terrorist etc. and you're not ashamed of your ignorance. You're not better
than the people in the video you posted the link above.
To be hones, those people sounded like Palin on that interview.
--
I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
--
Eddie Haskell
You're out of your gourd. He was tried by the senate and acquitted. Being
tried by the senate is impeachment, goober.
[points finger]
Hahahahahahah!
Eddie Haskell
Boy, I bet you thought the republicans held congress on election day too!
Moron!
Bwahahahahaha!
Zogby Poll
512 Obama Voters 11/13/08-11/15/08 MOE +/- 4.4 points
97.1% High School Graduate or higher, 55% College Graduates
Results to 12 simple Multiple Choice Questions
57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just
by guessing)
And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her
"house," even though that was Tina Fey who said that!!
http://www.howobamagotelected.com/research-zogby.asp
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
Obama says pass the "stimulus" or unemployment will reach 8%
But but but Bush.
Obama wins undeserved peace prize.
But but but Bush.
Obama's polls are tanking.
But but but Bush.
Blue dog democrats are blocking healthcare.
But but but Bush.
Obama took the wrong side in Honduras.
But but but Bush.
Ahmadinejad is playing Obama for a fool.
But but but Bush.
Obama sold out our allies in Eastern Europe.
But but but Bush.
We are losing in Afghanistan.
But but but Bush.
Obama told Georgia to cease hostilities when they were invaded by Russia.
But but but Bush.
Iran is getting the bomb and Obama is impotent.
But but but Bush.
The economy is still in the shitter and the stimulus is not working.
But but but Bush.
Obama sits on his hands and buttons his lip while Iranians protest for
freedom.
But but but Bush.
Obama is spending us into oblivion.
But but but Bush.
Obama is a clear-cut racist.
But but but Bush.
Obama is still carrying on rendition.
But but but Bush.
Obama is still holding detainees without trial.
But but but Bush.
Obama is carrying on NSA spying.
But but but Bush.
Eric Holder won't investigate voter intimidation.
But but but Bush.
Obama is DESTROYING the CIA.
But but but Bush.
Obama wants to raise taxes in the midst of a recession.
But but but Bush.
Iran is developing missiles.
But but but Bush.
Obama failed to get the Olympics
But but but Bush.
Obama's dog shits in Air Force One.
But but but Bush.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
"The Rock" <neve...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4b2679a4$0$28786$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
>
>
Zogby Poll
Eddie Haskell
"The Rock" <neve...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:4b2679a4$0$28786$892e...@news.lightningnews.com...
>
>
I guess Dan Rather didn't tell him.
Bwahahahahahaha!
"The Obama administration fell in line with the Bush administration Thursday
when it urged a federal judge to set aside a ruling in a closely watched spy
case weighing whether a U.S. president may bypass Congress and eavesdrop on
Americans without warrants."
"In a Thursday filing in San Francisco federal court, President Barack Obama
adopted the same position as his predacessor. With just hours left in
office, President George W. Bush late Monday asked U.S. District Judge
Vaughn Walker to stay enforcement of an important Jan. 5 ruling admitting
key evidence into the case."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/22/obama-sides-with-bush-in_n_160170.html
"President Obama acknowledged publicly for the first time yesterday that
some detainees at Guantanamo Bay may have to be held without trial
indefinitely, siding with conservative national security advocates on one of
the most contentious issues raised by the closing of the military prison in
Cuba. "
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/21/AR2009052104045.html
"Officials: Obama Will Continue Using Rendition As Counter-Terrorism Tool"
"Under executive orders issued by Obama recently, the CIA still has
authority to carry out what are known as renditions, secret abductions and
transfers of prisoners to countries that cooperate with the United States."
"The Obama administration appears to have determined that the rendition
program was one component of the Bush administration's war on terrorism that
it could not afford to discard."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/01/officials-obama-will-cont_n_162892.html
-Eddie Haskell
The Rock
"Eddie Haskell" <fg...@eeaeae.com> wrote in message
news:4b2916f6$0$13694$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
Come on Eddie, that man is the right wingers' god.
The worst President in the American history.
The rest of your posts are just the right extremists crap.
--
I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
--
www.lightningnews.com Lightning fast anonymous usenet downloads for 5$ only !
Tim Crowley
> "MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote in message
He had an impeachment trial. The verdict NOT GUILTY.
fuck, you are one dumb fucking coward.
Tim Crowley
what was the result of the impeachment trial?
NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
Tim Crowley
> "MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote in message
He had an impeachment trial. The verdict NOT GUILTY.
Governor Swill
>> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>>
>> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>
>what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
>NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
Swill
--
In the exam room . . .
Doctor: "Public Opt . . ."
Elephant: "SOCIALISM!"
Doctor: "Reflexes good."
MACK DADDY
> Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>
> >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
> >NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
>
> The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
>
> Swill
> --
The impeachment failed. It didn't stand up to the conviction.
If someone was accused of a murder and was tried in court, and then
they found out the murder was performed by someone else, do they still
call the first person a murderer? HELL NO!
You can be charged with slander for defaming a persons reputation like
that. I'm sure glad you don't work in the legal justice field. Every
time they bring 5 guys up in the window for the victims to pick the
guilty one you would throw them all in prison just because they are
suspects.
Tim Crowley
> >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>
> >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
> >NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
>
> The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
The result was failure. The fact you would like to lie about is that
President Clinton was found Not Guilty in his impeachment trail.
You lost. America won.
not guilty. the impeachment failed. even your hate cannot change
history
Eddie Haskell
No retort.
I win again.
> I can see Russia from my house...ROTFLMAO
Zogby Poll
Eddie Haskell
"Tim Crowley" <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f0ba58b6-d8bf-41f5...@u16g2000pru.googlegroups.com...
He was impeached and got a way with perjury.
That makes you proud.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 20, 4:17 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>
> >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
> >NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
>
> The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
>
> Swill
> --
> That's very slanderous of you!
> The impeachment failed. It didn't stand up to the conviction.
> If someone was accused of a murder and was tried in court, and then
> they found out the murder was performed by someone else, do they still
> call the first person a murderer? HELL NO!
He was indicted and that is the same as impeachment.
> You can be charged with slander for defaming a persons reputation like
> that.
So we can chare democrats for their slander against Tom Delay?
Now, run along. Your mommy's calling.
"Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
-MACK DADDY, never living it down.
Hahahahahahah!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
On Dec 20, 4:17 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>
> >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>
> >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
> >NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
>
> The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
> The result was failure. The fact you would like to lie about is that
> President Clinton was found Not Guilty in his impeachment trail.
> You lost. America won.
So he was not impeached and went to impeachment trial?
Bah hahahahahaha!!
-Edie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
So he was not impeached and went to impeachment trial?
Bah hahahahahaha!!
> fuck, you are one dumb fucking coward.
Yeah, and you're stupid as shit and never get any pussy.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
So he was not impeached and went to impeachment trial?
Bah hahahahahaha!!
> fuck, you are one dumb fucking coward.
Yeah, and you're stupid as shit and never get any pussy.
-Eddie Haskell
MACK DADDY
> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I think Eddies brain was impeached!
MACK DADDY
> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
They didn't have enough evidence to impeach him, you fascist!
MACK DADDY
> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
He had to go to the trial, you stupid shit. They weren't gonna send
him a card in the mail to tell him he was innocent. Everyone gets
their day in court. Clinton went, and was found NOT GUILTY!
Tim Crowley
> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
hint: NO GUILTY.
Hope for the Heartless
<d18074a8-9d54-43fa...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 4:17�pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
> >
> > >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
> >
> > >> -Eddie Haskell
> >
> > >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
> >
> > >NOT GUILTY. �The impeachment failed. Just like you.
> >
> > The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
>
> The result was failure. The fact you would like to lie about is that
> President Clinton was found Not Guilty in his impeachment trail.
> You lost. America won.
>
Sorry. Swill is correct. Impeachment is an act of the House, and that
act succeeded. But Impeachment only put the matter to a trial in the
Senate. The Senate found Clinton not guilty. So that settles the
matter. According to the Senate, no High Crime or Misdemeanor worthy
of removing a President occurred.
'Nuff said.
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article
> <d18074a8-9d54-43fa-9aa6-7999d3ba9...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
I think the problem is that the "attention deficit disorder"
Republitards only make it as far as the house of representatives part
of impeachment. Impeachment is a 2 part process that also involves
the Senate hearings, or trial if you will. Since Clinton was found
"not guilty", there was no impeachment!
Tim Crowley
wrote:
> In article
> <d18074a8-9d54-43fa-9aa6-7999d3ba9...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
Yes. Not Guilty. The impeachment trail failed. Swill is NEVER
correct.
Eddie Haskell
Then why did they, you retard!
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
> hint: NO GUILTY.
Hint: He was impeached.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
He was indicted and went to trial. That's impeachment, moron!
Hahahahahahaha!
-Eddie Haskell
Hope for the Heartless
<22b89e33-9589-461b...@k32g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe you ought to look up the word impeachment and see the Articles
that passed the House and get back to us when you realize you're
mistaken.
MACK DADDY
> "MACK DADDY" <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
They didn't! If you had been following this thread of messages you
would have seen that Clinton was found "NOT GUILTY".
MACK DADDY
You're so simple minded! Impeachment is a 2 part process. Accusing
someone of something is only the first part. The second part is the
trial, and if the results of the trial are the accused being found
innocent then there is no impeachment.
MACK DADDY
<h.heartl...@bitbucket.gov> wrote:
> In article
> <22b89e33-9589-461b-966f-068fd6fb1...@k32g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
NO, YOU'RE MISTAKEN! YOU ARE COMPLETELY IGNORING THE RESULTS OF THE
UNITED STATES SENATE! THERE IS IN FACT TWO BODIES COMPRISING OUR
CONGRESSIONAL SYSTEM YA DAMN FASCIST!
Tim Crowley
> "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:613b6c7a-a519-490a...@h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 21, 11:33 am, "Eddie Haskell" <f...@eeaeae.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Tim Crowley" <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:d18074a8-9d54-43fa...@u18g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> > On Dec 20, 4:17 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> "Bill Clinton was NOT impeached."
>
> > > >> MACK DADDY, never living it down.
>
> > > >> -Eddie Haskell
>
> > > >what was the result of the impeachment trial?
>
> > > >NOT GUILTY. The impeachment failed. Just like you.
>
> > > The conviction failed, the impeachment (indictment) succeeded.
> > > The result was failure. The fact you would like to lie about is that
> > > President Clinton was found Not Guilty in his impeachment trail.
> > > You lost. America won.
>
> > So he was not impeached and went to impeachment trial?
>
> > Bah hahahahahaha!!
>
> > -Edie Haskell
> > hint: NO GUILTY.
>
> Hint: He was impeached.
And the result? NOT GUILTY.
Buahahahahahahaha It's so fun to watch the scum, still hurting,
still screaming in pain. Dance for me, k000k.
MACK DADDY
<h.heartl...@bitbucket.gov> wrote:
> In article
> <22b89e33-9589-461b-966f-068fd6fb1...@k32g2000prb.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Nixon was impeached!
Hope for the Heartless
<6eb4202b-10d7-4b80...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
Moron.
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article
> <6eb4202b-10d7-4b80-94db-12e11f764...@y10g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
Governor Swill
>> > So he was not impeached and went to impeachment trial?
>>
>> > Bah hahahahahaha!!
>>
>> > -Edie Haskell
>> > hint: NO GUILTY.
>>
>> Hint: He was impeached.
>
>And the result? NOT GUILTY.
>Buahahahahahahaha It's so fun to watch the scum, still hurting,
>still screaming in pain. Dance for me, k000k.
Iddy, like most rightards is furious that Clinton was acquitted even
as the mainstream of his party wishes he was President again if not
for the last eight years.
For sure we wouldn't have an eleven trillion dollar deficit and two
messy wars if Clinton had been able to run in 2000 and 2004. I also
don't think 911 would have happened.
Swill
--
In the exam room . . .
Doctor: "Public Opt . . ."
Elephant: "SOCIALISM!"
Doctor: "Reflexes good."
Governor Swill
>Yes. Not Guilty. The impeachment trail failed. Swill is NEVER
>correct.
Which is exactly what I said, stupid. Clinton was not convicted, he
was only indicted.
Governor Swill
>The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
Yes. He was. Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
MACK DADDY
Yeah, too bad Clinton could not have been re-elected. I'm sure if
there wasn't term limits he would have been. He was still very
popular even after 2 full terms, AND even with the Monica scandal.
I'm sure 911 would not have happened if Clinton was President, of
course Al Gore was elected but Bush stole office and 911 DID happen.
MACK DADDY
You don't understand what "NOT GUILTY" means. Try to find out and
then maybe we can have a discussion!
Hope for the Heartless
<37428a5e-1203-4aae...@x20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
Was impeached. Wasn't convicted. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.
Hope for the Heartless
Governor Swill <governo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> >The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
>
> Yes. He was. Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
>
> Swill
That's very evident.
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article
> <37428a5e-1203-4aae-a16e-1ef3d84d0...@x20g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
Well if he wasn't convicted why do you spend so much time on the
internets trying to convince the world that Clinton was impeached?
You really should find something productive to do with your life!
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article <l838j5t5pavb8eh1hsqc795mlo3fald...@4ax.com>,
> Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > >The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
>
> > Yes. He was. Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
>
> > Swill
>
> That's very evident.
Do you not understand what NOT GUILTY means?
Hope for the Heartless
<e8ca3069-36c2-49e8...@k9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
Sounds like a verdict. Impeachment means indictment.
Hope for the Heartless
<a41fc56f-f2fb-4e36...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
I wouldn't except that ignorant yokels like you keep misusing words.
It's important for me for some obscure reason that you don't confuse
others.
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article
> <a41fc56f-f2fb-4e36-b181-0df9e12b9...@r5g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>,
> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 24, 9:56 pm, Hope for the Heartless <h.heartl...@bitbucket.gov>
> > wrote:
> > > Was impeached. Wasn't convicted. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE.- Hide quoted text
> > > -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > Well if he wasn't convicted why do you spend so much time on the
> > internets trying to convince the world that Clinton was impeached?
> > You really should find something productive to do with your life!
>
> I wouldn't except that ignorant yokels like you keep misusing words.
> It's important for me for some obscure reason that you don't confuse
> others.
I'm not confusing anyone except for Republitards like you who rely on
Fox News for all your news needs!
Governor Swill
>On Dec 24, 4:54�pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
>> >The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
>>
>> Yes. �He was. �Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
>You don't understand what "NOT GUILTY" means. Try to find out and
>then maybe we can have a discussion!
You have just proven once again that you do not understand what
impeachment is. I have already drawn you a picture. I see no need to
continue to waste my time trying to explain it to you further.
Governor Swill
>Do you not understand what NOT GUILTY means?
I have stated repeatedly that he was not guilty. Let me try this once
more.
If a man is arrested and indicted for murder and subsequently
acquitted, does the acquittal remove the indictment from his criminal
record?
Governor Swill
>Well if he wasn't convicted why do you spend so much time on the
>internets trying to convince the world that Clinton was impeached?
Because he was, fool!
Governor Swill
>I'm not confusing anyone except for Republitards like you who rely on
>Fox News for all your news needs
You are the one who is confused.
MACK DADDY
Good! Because I'm tired of you misinforming the other readers of this
group!
MACK DADDY
MACK DADDY
I'm not confused at all. I know that Clinton was not impeached!
Tim Crowley
> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
>
> Yes. He was. Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
Actually the impeachment failed. He was acquitted. Do you not
understand what acquitted is?
MACK DADDY
Tim, These guys are hopeless. If an accused killer is found innocent
by a court of law they still think it's a killer.
Governor Swill
Impeachment is an indictment. Is an indictment removed from a
defendant's record if he is acquitted? No. He remains an indicted
felon, just not a convicted one. Just like Andrew Johnson who, my
elementary teachers taught me, was the first US President to be
impeached, Clinton was acquitted by the Senate. The fact remains that
the impeachments of Johnson and Clinton still stand as impeachments
though neither was convicted.
I ask again, is a defendant's criminal record expunged if he is
acquitted?
Governor Swill
Again you show yiour ignorance. If a man is indicted for murder then
acquitted in court, the indictment is not removed from his criminal
record. He remains an indicted felon though not a convicted one.
You are not arguing legal points or correct definitions or legal
procedures, you're argument is entirely partisan and emotional and has
little to do with reality.
Governor Swill
>I'm not confused at all. I know that Clinton was not impeached!
Yes, he was. Clinton was the second American President to be
impeached. Neither was convicted by the Senate, but the House
impeachment still stands.
Governor Swill
>On Dec 26, 5:40�pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
>> >Well if he wasn't convicted why do you spend so much time on the
>> >internets trying to convince the world that Clinton was impeached?
>>
>> Because he was, fool!
>
>Clinton was not guilty!
Agreed. But his acquittal in the Senate does not mean he was not
impeached by the House.
Something else Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton have in common, in both
cases, their impeachments were entirely political in nature and had
nothing to do with any actual illegal acts or job performance issues.
Both were impeached (for purely political reasons) by the opposition
party in the house and neither was convicted in the Senate despite its
also being controlled by the opposition. Both will stand in history
as impeached Presidents though neither was convicted and both served
the remainder of their terms.
Iarnrod
Yes he was.
What failed was conviction in the Senate. But the House impeached him.
It was of course all political and doomed from the start, but you are
confusing impeachment with conviction.
MACK DADDY
If he is not convicted then he is not a felon, you stupid fucker!
MACK DADDY
> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 28, 5:21 am, Tim Crowley <timmyturm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Dec 24, 4:54 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >> > >The bottom line is that Clinton was not impeached.
>
> >> > Yes. He was. Do you not understand what "impeachment" is?
>
> >> Actually the impeachment failed. He was acquitted. Do you not
> >> understand what acquitted is?
> >Tim, These guys are hopeless. If an accused killer is found innocent
> >by a court of law they still think it's a killer.
>
> Again you show yiour ignorance. If a man is indicted for murder then
> acquitted in court, the indictment is not removed from his criminal
> record. He remains an indicted felon though not a convicted one.
>
> You are not arguing legal points or correct definitions or legal
> procedures, you're argument is entirely partisan and emotional and has
> little to do with reality.
>
> Swill
> --
You are not dealing in reality, and you show your partisanship. You
just look really stupid calling aquitted people felons.
MACK DADDY
> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >I'm not confused at all. I know that Clinton was not impeached!
>
> Yes, he was. Clinton was the second American President to be
> impeached. Neither was convicted by the Senate, but the House
> impeachment still stands.
>
> Swill
> --
You should stop trashing Clinton, the greatest President of the last
30 years!
MACK DADDY
> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >On Dec 26, 5:40 pm, Governor Swill <governor.sw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> MACK DADDY <pepsivani...@msn.com> wrote:
> >> >Well if he wasn't convicted why do you spend so much time on the
> >> >internets trying to convince the world that Clinton was impeached?
>
> >> Because he was, fool!
>
> >Clinton was not guilty!
>
> Agreed. But his acquittal in the Senate does not mean he was not
> impeached by the House.
>
> Something else Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton have in common, in both
> cases, their impeachments were entirely political in nature and had
> nothing to do with any actual illegal acts or job performance issues.
>
> Both were impeached (for purely political reasons) by the opposition
> party in the house and neither was convicted in the Senate despite its
> also being controlled by the opposition. Both will stand in history
> as impeached Presidents though neither was convicted and both served
> the remainder of their terms.
>
> Swill
> --
Fortunately neither was impeached because the House of Reps does NOT
have the final say. The House might very well have wanted them to be
impeached but the Senate put the smack down and said "no impeachment!"
Iarnrod
Wrong. The House impeached Andrew Johnson and the House impeached Bill
Clinton. It just is what it is, dearie. In both cases, the Senate
refused to convict. That does not erase the House impeachments. Take a
civics lesson.
MACK DADDY
>
> - Show quoted text -
By refusing to convict, it makes the whole case irrellevant! That
means it's not worth talking about!
Iarnrod
Then stop talking about it.
You are still incorrect. He was impeached; he was not convicted.
Hope for the Heartless
<6fb95ef9-a01e-47b4...@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
And that explains your many posts on the subject, right?
MACK DADDY
>
> - Show quoted text -
He was NOT impeached by the Senate!
MACK DADDY
wrote:
> In article
> <6fb95ef9-a01e-47b4-82d6-ca70ce74b...@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>
> - Show quoted text -
I'm just doing my civic duty to correct your misinformation on the
subject eh!
Tim Crowley
What does the Constitution say you can be impeached for? Was
President Clinton found guilty of any of them?
Iarnrod
Duh, fool, that's because the Senate is not the body that does the
impeaching.
He WAS impeached by the House, which is how the process works. He was
impeached in the House but acquitted in the Senate,
You show a fundamental failure to understand basic civics here,
dearie. You're embarrassing yourself.
Iarnrod
Of course not. He finished his term. He was acquitted of the
impeachment charges. He was impeached in the House and acquitted in
the Senate.
I'm sorry but were you confused about this?
MACK DADDY
>
> - Show quoted text -
Now, hold on a minute, wait!
I wanna try to help you out here. I think you got it bassackwards!
You seem to be thinkin' that the Senate trial came before the house
impeachment trial. A quick fact-check will show you that the standard
way of conducting this procedure in these United States of America is
that the House holds it's trial first. After that the trial moves to
the Senate.
Hope for the Heartless
<7e529aa5-9d1e-4629...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
Another who is unclear on the difference between impeached and convicted.
Hope for the Heartless
<bdd2d8e2-bf1c-48d3...@a32g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
The Senate CAN'T impeach. Only the House has that power.
Hope for the Heartless
<fc75bae8-76cc-4721...@1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
MACK DADDY <pepsiv...@msn.com> wrote:
Are you really this stupid, or are you just having us on?
Tim Crowley
End of story, according to the Constitution of the United States of
America - the impeachment attempt failed. End of Story.
Tim Crowley
wrote:
> In article
> <7e529aa5-9d1e-4629-a404-7e3634b41...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
hint: read the constitution.
Iarnrod
It's highly doubtful you could do any such thing since you've
demonstrated that you are completely ignorant on impeachment.
> I think you got it bassackwards!
No, I checked and it's you.
> You seem to be thinkin' that the Senate trial came before the house
> impeachment trial.
Show where you got that completely loony impression from, dearie. What
on earth gave you the impression I thought any such thing? Are you
sniffing glue?
> A quick fact-check will show you that the standard
> way of conducting this procedure in these United States of America is
> that the House holds it's trial first.
BWAHAHAHHAAAHAHAAAA!!!!!
"The House holds it's [SIC] trial first!" BWAHAAAHAHAHA!!
Other than being illiterate AND civically stupid, what other tricks
can you perform to amuse your betters, dearie?
The House does not hold any trial, sweetums. the House impeaches, the
SENATE holds the trial.
> After that the trial moves to
> the Senate.
The trial doesn't move anywhere. If the House approves Articles of
Impeachment, the Senate then holds the trial. In Clinton's case, he
was impeached in the House and acquitted at the trial in the Senate.
We of course knew it would be this way because the numbers weren't
ever there for the stupid Republicans to carry off their political
stunt, but they pushed it anyway.
Look, dearie, you're simply proven wrong on this whole embarrassing
claim of yours that Clinton wasn't impeached. He was, and he was then
acquitted.
Now stop sniffing glue.
Iarnrod
The impeachment was successful. The removal from office was not.
Tim Crowley
That is not what the Constitution says. Let's see, "landrod" vs US
Constitution. Guess who wins. The impeachment attempt failed.
Thanks for playing.
Hope for the Heartless
<ef5efa43-de6d-49af...@e27g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
I did. It says the Congress shall have the power to Impeach and the
Senate shall try the President on the Articles passed by Congress.
Nobody can deny that Congress impeached him by passing Articles of
Impeachment. It's part of the Congressional record and appears or will
appear that way in history books. If Congress impeached him that means
he WAS IMPEACHED.
Why are you making an issue of this? We both agree he was not guilty.
What you're saying is equivalent to if a Grand Jury indicts you for
robbing a 7-Eleven and you go to trial and the jury finds you not
guilty, that you were never indicted. You WERE indicted, just as the
President WAS impeached.
Because that's what an Impeachment is. It's a form of indictment.
Hope for the Heartless
<a2b301e9-aa96-4935...@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> End of story, according to the Constitution of the United States of
> America - the impeachment attempt failed. End of Story.
An impeachment attempt fails if Articles of Impeachment are offered and
Congress either does not vote on them or votes them down. If it passes
the House, that's a success, and it forces a Senate trial. But it
doesn't remove a President. The Senate trial does that.
Hope for the Heartless
<f33bc43e-b33a-46a4...@u41g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>,
Tim Crowley <timmyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
Sorry Tim, you're wrong. Iarnrod has it correct. I think it can be
agreed among everybody who understands anything that you need to be
ignored on questions of what the Constitution does or doesn't say, since
you understand none of it.