Sec. of State Harris Sacrificing Her Current Job for One With George W. Bush?

[Freedom1776]

I suppose she may be seeking a position in a possible Bush/Cheney
administration since she has shown more loyalty to Gov. George W. Bush
than to the people of Florida.

--
http://www.bushwatch.com
http://slate.msn.com/Features/bushisms/bushisms.asp
http://gore_in_context.tripod.com/
http://www.georgebush2000.com/

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

[Michael Beck]

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 07:28:13 GMT, Freedom1776
<freed...@my-deja.com> wrote:

>I suppose she may be seeking a position in a possible Bush/Cheney
>administration since she has shown more loyalty to Gov. George W. Bush
>than to the people of Florida.

I suppose she may be just following the law.

That's a strange concept for Clintonites and Gorons.
--
Michael Beck

[bill...@clark.net]

She's done her job and done it correctly...

On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 07:28:13 GMT, Freedom1776
<freed...@my-deja.com> wrote:

[Thomas Grinnell]

She is up for an ambassadorship.

Freedom1776 <freed...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:8v2mma$u08$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...

[Thomas Gagne]

The supreme court didn't agree or disagree with anything. It simply stayed
the certification until it could hear arguments.

--
.tom

[bill...@clark.net]

Try it again.... She has NOT been overruled on anything. Without
argument, the state Supreme Court delayed certifaction. Nothing more,
nothing less.
Try spinning this all you like..

On 18 Nov 2000 06:46:32 -0000, Anonymous...@See.Comment.Header
(=?iso-8859-1?Q?Grishn=E1kh?=) wrote:

>In article <3a1531af...@md.news.verio.net>

>bill...@clark.net wrote:
>>
>>
>> She's done her job and done it correctly...
>

>I'm sure George W. Bush agrees with you.
>
>However, the Supreme Court of the State of Florida does not.
>
>That's why they have overruled her decision.
>
>Twice.
>
>
>

[John Eric Hanson]

Which job would that be? Secretary of State? Or her campaign job? Somehow
I don't think 'both' is the correct answer here.

<bill...@clark.net> wrote in message
news:3a1531af...@md.news.verio.net...

>
> She's done her job and done it correctly...
>

[Tom Wright]

John Eric Hanson wrote:

> Which job would that be? Secretary of State? Or her campaign job? Somehow
> I don't think 'both' is the correct answer here.

I think "both" is a most accurate, honest and fair answer!

>
> <bill...@clark.net> wrote in message
> news:3a1531af...@md.news.verio.net...
> >
> > She's done her job and done it correctly...
> >
> > On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 07:28:13 GMT, Freedom1776
> > <freed...@my-deja.com> wrote:
> >

[2 + 2]

Well, she should have at least an honorary title, such as "rich ____," in
fairness.

The media definitely hopes she will have a top job, given her star quality
as media copy.

Also, all those wonkie newsPERSONS can get their rocks off interviewing her.

Except the "cat patrol," the sisterhood might be regenerated just to _____
about her.

Will we see stories based on her makeup, as a portent of administration
policy? Or at least symbolic of something or other, to brighten up a
tiresome political culture.

Without Bill randying up to anything standing, what will fill the copy void?

2 + 2

2 + 2

John Eric Hanson wrote in message ...

>Which job would that be? Secretary of State? Or her campaign job?
Somehow
>I don't think 'both' is the correct answer here.
>
>

><bill...@clark.net> wrote in message
>news:3a1531af...@md.news.verio.net...
>>
>> She's done her job and done it correctly...
>>
>> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 07:28:13 GMT, Freedom1776
>> <freed...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>