Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

WE HAD TO MOVE JFK to the Republican side after the major shift to Socialism took place in the Democrat party.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
Mar 10, 2012, 6:56:31 PM3/10/12
to
On 3/9/2012 10:03 PM, Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <8g4ll7lb9spfenqj2...@4ax.com>,
> Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:24:33 +0000 (UTC), The truth will set you free
>> <aven...@angel.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>
>>> Free Lunch <lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
>>> news:i5ikl790glkc3qov7...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:11:09 -0600, "Zacharias Mulletstein"
>>>> <zachariasm...@isalwaysright.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ramon F Herrera" <gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:c85cb6c8-7652-4e26...@w29g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Mar 9, 10:07 am, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> "noamnesty2000" <noamnasty2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> news:bca2f362-d189-42c6...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2:26 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 4:12 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Not Sure" <fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:a20e8f49-757d-4e6a...@p7g2000yqk.googlegroups.
>>>>>>>>>> com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 7:04 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <ra...@conexus.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The left hates ideas (which is fine!).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The right, people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Ramon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You hate Tea Party members, liar. Better luck next time :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The left is the one that hates
>>>>>>>>>> One only has to look at all the venom that comes out of the
>>>>>>>>>> "secular"
>>>>>>>>>> left
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People on the right are more likely to feel pity and contempt
>>>>>>>>>> That's because hate is a lot of work that actually takes effort
>>>>>>>>>> People on the right prefer to use that effort for more
>>>>>>>>>> constructive
>>>>>>>>>> purposes
>>>>>>>>>> And most of the Christians on the right do try to avoid hating,
>>>>>>>>>> and instead
>>>>>>>>>> try to practice the notion of "loving their neighbor', no matter
>>>>>>>>>> how hateful
>>>>>>>>>> they may be.
>>>>>>>>>> They may not always succeed, but they do try.
>>>>>>>>>> Those on the left don't even try at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ALL expressions of hatred toward WHOLE CLASSES of people come from
>>>>>>>>> the right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only ones qualified to make that statement are the victims of
>>>>>>>>> prejudice themselves. Let's ask them, shall we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's their response:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Black folks voted for Obama, by a 98% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Jewish folks voted for Obama, by a 75% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Hispanic folks voted for Obama, by a 66% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Oriental folks voted for Obama, by a 63% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Gay folks voted for Obama, by an unknown margin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Ramon- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no hate against an entire group. There is however
>>>>>>>> objection to illegal aliens and their supporters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fist thing would be to ask the source of the numbers that ramone
>>>>>>> spouts
>>>>>>> He has been caught lying before.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But even so, It's always funny to see idiots on the left spout the
>>>>>>> nonsense
>>>>>>> that if you state a TRUTH that they don't want to hear, then
>>>>>>> automatically
>>>>>>> it's got to be some SIXHIRB-ism
>>>>>>> If you note that 98% of blacks voted for Obama, that FACT that such a
>>>>>>> STATISTICALLY DISPROPORTIONATE number of "colored" people voted for a
>>>>>>> "colored" candidate does not smack of racism. But that someone noted
>>>>>>> such a
>>>>>>> STATISTICAL DISCREPANCY, is most definitely racism.
>>>>>>> Naturally, the clueless on the left, fail to see that dichotomy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Racism necessarily implies hate. Voting FOR somebody (based on race,
>>>>>> whatever) is an expression of love. Voting AGAINST somebody based on
>>>>>> race is an expression of hatred.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it's a free choice. I can vote for or against anybody I want to for
>>>>> whatever reason. Does the fact that I'm not going to vote for Romney
>>>>> mean that I hate Him?
>>>>
>>>> It all depends. The Republican Party went out of its way after George
>>>> Wallace's success to welcome racists and other sorts of bigots into
>>>> their party. The action was called the Southern Strategy and it was very
>>>> successful. It's been particularly successful because they have hardly
>>>> ever had to pay off those bigots by actually passing laws that the
>>>> bigots want.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You do realize that since there is no such thing as a "free Lunch" you, by
>>> definition, don't exist.
>>
>> Tell it to the clowns in the right wing who think they can cut tax rates
>> and get more revenue.
>
>
> It worked for JFK.
>
>
> snicker


WE HAD TO MOVE JFK to the Republican side after the major shift to
Socialism took place in the Democrat party.

--
Bread and beer increased prosperity to a level that allowed time for
development of other technology and contributed to the building of
civilizations.[19][20][21][22]
0 new messages