On 3/9/2012 10:03 PM, Harold Burton wrote:
> In article <
8g4ll7lb9spfenqj2...@4ax.com>,
> Free Lunch <
lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 19:24:33 +0000 (UTC), The truth will set you free
>> <
aven...@angel.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>
>>> Free Lunch <
lu...@nofreelunch.us> wrote in
>>>
news:i5ikl790glkc3qov7...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012 12:11:09 -0600, "Zacharias Mulletstein"
>>>> <
zachariasm...@isalwaysright.com> wrote in alt.atheism:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Ramon F Herrera" <
gopo...@jonjay.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:c85cb6c8-7652-4e26...@w29g2000yqw.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> On Mar 9, 10:07 am, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> "noamnesty2000" <
noamnasty2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
news:bca2f362-d189-42c6...@j5g2000yqm.googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 2:26 pm, "Ramon F. Herrera" <
ra...@conexus.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 4:12 pm, "SaPeIsMa" <SaPeI...@HotMail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "Not Sure" <
fred1321...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> news:a20e8f49-757d-4e6a...@p7g2000yqk.googlegroups.
>>>>>>>>>> com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mar 8, 7:04 am, "Ramon F. Herrera" <
ra...@conexus.net>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> The left hates ideas (which is fine!).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The right, people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> -Ramon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You hate Tea Party members, liar. Better luck next time :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The left is the one that hates
>>>>>>>>>> One only has to look at all the venom that comes out of the
>>>>>>>>>> "secular"
>>>>>>>>>> left
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> People on the right are more likely to feel pity and contempt
>>>>>>>>>> That's because hate is a lot of work that actually takes effort
>>>>>>>>>> People on the right prefer to use that effort for more
>>>>>>>>>> constructive
>>>>>>>>>> purposes
>>>>>>>>>> And most of the Christians on the right do try to avoid hating,
>>>>>>>>>> and instead
>>>>>>>>>> try to practice the notion of "loving their neighbor', no matter
>>>>>>>>>> how hateful
>>>>>>>>>> they may be.
>>>>>>>>>> They may not always succeed, but they do try.
>>>>>>>>>> Those on the left don't even try at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ALL expressions of hatred toward WHOLE CLASSES of people come from
>>>>>>>>> the right.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The only ones qualified to make that statement are the victims of
>>>>>>>>> prejudice themselves. Let's ask them, shall we?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here's their response:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Black folks voted for Obama, by a 98% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Jewish folks voted for Obama, by a 75% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Hispanic folks voted for Obama, by a 66% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Oriental folks voted for Obama, by a 63% margin.
>>>>>>>>> - Gay folks voted for Obama, by an unknown margin.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Ramon- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is no hate against an entire group. There is however
>>>>>>>> objection to illegal aliens and their supporters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The fist thing would be to ask the source of the numbers that ramone
>>>>>>> spouts
>>>>>>> He has been caught lying before.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But even so, It's always funny to see idiots on the left spout the
>>>>>>> nonsense
>>>>>>> that if you state a TRUTH that they don't want to hear, then
>>>>>>> automatically
>>>>>>> it's got to be some SIXHIRB-ism
>>>>>>> If you note that 98% of blacks voted for Obama, that FACT that such a
>>>>>>> STATISTICALLY DISPROPORTIONATE number of "colored" people voted for a
>>>>>>> "colored" candidate does not smack of racism. But that someone noted
>>>>>>> such a
>>>>>>> STATISTICAL DISCREPANCY, is most definitely racism.
>>>>>>> Naturally, the clueless on the left, fail to see that dichotomy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Racism necessarily implies hate. Voting FOR somebody (based on race,
>>>>>> whatever) is an expression of love. Voting AGAINST somebody based on
>>>>>> race is an expression of hatred.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it's a free choice. I can vote for or against anybody I want to for
>>>>> whatever reason. Does the fact that I'm not going to vote for Romney
>>>>> mean that I hate Him?
>>>>
>>>> It all depends. The Republican Party went out of its way after George
>>>> Wallace's success to welcome racists and other sorts of bigots into
>>>> their party. The action was called the Southern Strategy and it was very
>>>> successful. It's been particularly successful because they have hardly
>>>> ever had to pay off those bigots by actually passing laws that the
>>>> bigots want.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You do realize that since there is no such thing as a "free Lunch" you, by
>>> definition, don't exist.
>>
>> Tell it to the clowns in the right wing who think they can cut tax rates
>> and get more revenue.
>
>
> It worked for JFK.
>
>
> snicker
WE HAD TO MOVE JFK to the Republican side after the major shift to
Socialism took place in the Democrat party.
--
Bread and beer increased prosperity to a level that allowed time for
development of other technology and contributed to the building of
civilizations.[19][20][21][22]