...Obama chuckles at McCain's hypocritical shrieking
Harry Hope
He also mocked McCain's opposition to talking to Hamas in light of an
interview McCain gave two years ago, in which he appeared to support
talking to Hamas.
May 16, 2008
Obama on McCain: Hypocrisy and fear-mongering
In an appearance in South Dakota just now, Barack Obama came back at
yesterday's attacks from George W. Bush and John McCain, accusing them
of "hypocrisy, fear-peddling and fear-mongering."
He responded first to the charge from Bush that Democrats stand for
appeasement in the Middle East.
"That’s exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided our
country and that alienates us from the world, and that’s why we need
change in Washington," he said, going to repeatedly link Bush and
McCain.
___________________________________________________
heh heh
Harry
Steven L.
> He also mocked McCain's opposition to talking to Hamas in light of an
> interview McCain gave two years ago, in which he appeared to support
> talking to Hamas.
McCain said we should "deal with" Hamas.
Obviously he meant that in the same sense as we should "deal with" al-Qaeda.
"Deal with" doesn't necessarily mean "negotiate."
It means "handle the problem."
--
Steven L.
Email: sdli...@earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
CHICANERY
"Steven L." <sdli...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:47ydnYw1UeJBj7PV...@earthlink.com...
> Harry Hope wrote:
>> He also mocked McCain's opposition to talking to Hamas in light of an
>> interview McCain gave two years ago, in which he appeared to support
>> talking to Hamas.
>
> McCain said we should "deal with" Hamas.
>
> Obviously he meant that in the same sense as we should "deal with"
> al-Qaeda.
>
> "Deal with" doesn't necessarily mean "negotiate."
> It means "handle the problem."
Bush has had almost 8 years to openly 'deal' with a plethora of issues but
at a cost of Trillions a year, decided he was above being president and
decided to be god.
Cogn...@gmail.com
> "That’s exactly the kind of appalling attack that’s divided our
> country and that alienates us from the world, and that’s why we need
> change in Washington," he said, going to repeatedly link Bush and
> McCain.
We don't need change in Washington, "Harry." We need change in our
pockets.
--
Neolibertarian
Neolibertarian
retro...@comcast.net wrote:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vn55ZdmBPJ4&feature=user
That's cute.
--
NeoLibertarian
the_pc_jellybean!!
<Cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a0fc36df-0634-4162...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>We don't need change in Washington, "Harry."
Of course we do, you moron.
Neolibertarian
You're right, of course.
We do need change, but ending the 75 year old Regime of the Bureaucracy
in Washington won't be easy.
It certainly won't be as easy as merely showing up at the voting booth
on the first Tuesday of November.
--
NeoLibertarian
the_pc_jellybean!!
"Neolibertarian" <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cognac756-CFED5...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> In article <1v99mm....@news.alt.net>, <tHe_PC_JeLLy BeAn!!> wrote:
>
>> <Cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:a0fc36df-0634-4162...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> >We don't need change in Washington, "Harry."
>>
>> Of course we do, you moron.
>
> You're right, of course.
>
> We do need change, but ending the 75 year old Regime of the Bureaucracy
> in Washington won't be easy.
>
> It certainly won't be as easy as merely showing up at the voting booth
> on the first Tuesday of November.
agreed.