Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Obama Never Claimed He Was A Civil Libertarian
6 views
Skip to first unread message
Bret Cahill
Jun 19, 2013, 12:40:38 PM6/19/13
to
Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
believe he was a civil libertarian?
If someone claims he's a civil libertarian you need to run some tests
to determine if that is the case, because every fraud, swindler and
hypocrite claims he's for liberty. The converse is not true.
The only civil libertarian holding high office is Justice Ginzberg.
Bret Cahill
believe he was a civil libertarian?
If someone claims he's a civil libertarian you need to run some tests
to determine if that is the case, because every fraud, swindler and
hypocrite claims he's for liberty. The converse is not true.
The only civil libertarian holding high office is Justice Ginzberg.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 19, 2013, 1:57:28 PM6/19/13
to
On 6/19/2013 12:40 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> believe he was a civil libertarian?
NO, Obama led me to believe that he was a Socialist Authoritarian...
> Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> believe he was a civil libertarian?
and it turns out I was correct.
>
> Bret Cahill
>
>
>
>
>
Bret Cahill
Jun 19, 2013, 4:33:43 PM6/19/13
to
> > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> NO
Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
> > believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> NO
called servitudetarians.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 19, 2013, 4:56:15 PM6/19/13
to
doesn't mean all things he does say are NOT lies.
Truth is Obama lied by saying he's a Capitalist and we all know he's a
Socialist and Redistribution type.
There's a shit load of deception, you simply chose the one subject that
was beyond the pale of belief so Obama never tried to use that
particular lie.
Harold Burton
Jun 19, 2013, 5:25:27 PM6/19/13
to
In article
<fc024c6d-64ae-4e1d...@v5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>,
<fc024c6d-64ae-4e1d...@v5g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <Bret_E...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > > believe he was a civil libertarian?
> > > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > > believe he was a civil libertarian?
> > NO, Obama led me to believe that he was a Socialist Authoritarian...
> > and it turns out I was correct.
> > and it turns out I was correct.
> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
> called servitudetarians.
snicker
> called servitudetarians.
Bret Cahill
Jun 19, 2013, 5:43:24 PM6/19/13
to
> > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > believe he was a civil libertarian?
> NO
> > believe he was a civil libertarian?
> NO
Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
called servitudetarians.
Bret Cahill
called servitudetarians.
Dare
Jun 20, 2013, 9:33:39 AM6/20/13
to
"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in message
news:CVowt.405937$Yp1.3...@en-nntp-13.dc1.easynews.com...
Seems even the base has lost confidence in him...and his credibility.
news:CVowt.405937$Yp1.3...@en-nntp-13.dc1.easynews.com...
> On 6/19/2013 4:33 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>>> Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
>>>> believe he was a civil libertarian?
>>>
>>> NO
>>
>> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
>> called servitudetarians.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>>
>
> One deception is NOT all deception.... Because one thing wasn't lying
> doesn't mean all things he does say are NOT lies.
Is Obama more of a liability than an asset to the Democratic Party now?
>>>> Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
>>>> believe he was a civil libertarian?
>>>
>>> NO
>>
>> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
>> called servitudetarians.
>>
>> Bret Cahill
>>
>
> One deception is NOT all deception.... Because one thing wasn't lying
> doesn't mean all things he does say are NOT lies.
Seems even the base has lost confidence in him...and his credibility.
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 20, 2013, 10:02:30 AM6/20/13
to
of the Democrat non thinkers are asking themselves questions but they'll
forget all about it in a few days so it's like that stupid RESET BUTTON
with Russia, the slate will be wiped clean in a short while thanks to
short Democrat memories.
Get rid of them all because you just can't fix stupid.
Bret Cahill
Jun 20, 2013, 11:58:09 AM6/20/13
to
> >>>> Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> >>>> believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> >>> NO
>
> >> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
> >> called servitudetarians.
>
> >> Bret Cahill
>
> > One deception is NOT all deception.... Because one thing wasn't lying
> > doesn't mean all things he does say are NOT lies.
>
> Is Obama more of a liability than an asset to the Democratic Party now?
> Seems even the base has lost confidence in him...and his credibility.
They should have known all along from the Patriot Act and the
> >>>> believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> >>> NO
>
> >> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
> >> called servitudetarians.
>
> >> Bret Cahill
>
> > One deception is NOT all deception.... Because one thing wasn't lying
> > doesn't mean all things he does say are NOT lies.
>
> Is Obama more of a liability than an asset to the Democratic Party now?
> Seems even the base has lost confidence in him...and his credibility.
political climate generally. The jingoistic legacy media had been
gush hyping "9/11 changed EEEEEVERything" 24/7/52 for years. As
everyone knows "9/11 changed EEEEEVERything" meant the war on terror
was more important than the constitution, the economy or wasting a few
trillion on mideast despotisms.
Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
about NSA spying anyway.
Has anyone even heard of any arrests of non terrorist criminals
because of the spying, i.e., a meth dealer getting busted by local law
enforcement tipped off by NSA?
If no one knew of any 4th Amend. violations then why should it be a
high priority for Obama?
Once again, if you want the 4th Amendment and other rights to be in
full effect then you must _first_ ensure that the First Amendment is
fully operational.
Jefferson and Tocqueville were clear on this all important truth.
Tocqueville mentions countries that are free with only one right,
freedom of speech. It's not like any of the other amendments mean
anything w/o freedom of speech.
The only public figure alive today who seems to understand this all
important truth is Justice Ginzberg.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 20, 2013, 12:15:31 PM6/20/13
to
On 6/20/2013 11:58 AM, Bret Cahill wrote:
> Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> about NSA spying anyway.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#t=84s
> Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> about NSA spying anyway.
Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
Listen carefully at the time Stamp of about 84 seconds.
Bret Cahill
Jun 20, 2013, 12:22:22 PM6/20/13
to
> > Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
> > certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> > under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> > changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> > about NSA spying anyway.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#...
> > certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> > under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> > changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> > about NSA spying anyway.
>
>
> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
No one interpreted that as "changing everything."
> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
bc
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 20, 2013, 12:39:02 PM6/20/13
to
-Obama-
The world is everything isn't it?
And NOT simply change but "FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE" America.
fun�da�men�tal
(fnd-mntl)
adj.
1.
a. Of or relating to the foundation or base; elementary: the fundamental
laws of the universe.
b. Forming or serving as an essential component of a system or
structure; central: an example that was fundamental to the argument.
c. Of great significance or entailing major change: a book that
underwent fundamental revision.
2. Physics
a. Of or relating to the component of lowest frequency of a periodic
wave or quantity.
b. Of or relating to the lowest possible frequency of a vibrating
element or system.
3. Music Having the root in the bass: a fundamental chord.
n.
1. Something that is an essential or necessary part of a system or object.
2. Music The first harmonic in a harmonic series; the lowest harmonic.
3. Physics The lowest frequency of a periodically varying quantity or of
a vibrating system.
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 20, 2013, 12:59:09 PM6/20/13
to
On 6/20/2013 12:22 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
--
*Rumination*
#16 - I'm not a genius, but I know how to hire them.
Bret Cahill
Jun 20, 2013, 1:11:38 PM6/20/13
to
> >>> Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
> >>> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> >>> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> >>> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> >>> about NSA spying anyway.
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#...
>
> >> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
>
> > No one interpreted that as "changing everything."
>
> > bc
>
> "We will change this country and we will change the world"
> -Obama-
>
> The world is everything isn't it?
There's still the moon and mars.
> >>> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
> >>> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
> >>> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
> >>> about NSA spying anyway.
>
> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#...
>
> >> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
>
> > No one interpreted that as "changing everything."
>
> > bc
>
> "We will change this country and we will change the world"
> -Obama-
>
> The world is everything isn't it?
> And NOT simply change but "FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE" America.
change to a 1 party country.
Bret Cahill
BeamMeUpScotty
Jun 20, 2013, 1:32:42 PM6/20/13
to
On 6/20/2013 1:11 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
>>>>> Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
>>>>> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
>>>>> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
>>>>> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
>>>>> about NSA spying anyway.
>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#...
>>
>>>> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
>>
>>> No one interpreted that as "changing everything."
>>
>>> bc
>>
>> "We will change this country and we will change the world"
>> -Obama-
>>
>> The world is everything isn't it?
>
> There's still the moon and mars.
And those changes are NOT really my problem, BUT if you send Obama there
>>>>> Obama never claimed that he was changing everything and Obama
>>>>> certainly never indicated that he was changing the spying that started
>>>>> under BushCo/legacy media noise. If he had he would have touted his
>>>>> changes at a formal event. Half of Americans don't care too much
>>>>> about NSA spying anyway.
>>
>>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=KrefKCaV8m4#...
>>
>>>> Obama says he's Fundamentally changing America and the *WORLD*
>>
>>> No one interpreted that as "changing everything."
>>
>>> bc
>>
>> "We will change this country and we will change the world"
>> -Obama-
>>
>> The world is everything isn't it?
>
> There's still the moon and mars.
to change them, I'm good with that.
Can he head out of the moon tomorrow?
Harold Burton
Jun 20, 2013, 10:26:51 PM6/20/13
to
In article
<b4a5d7d9-e052-49c5...@rh15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
snicker
<b4a5d7d9-e052-49c5...@rh15g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <Bret_E...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > > believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> > > Did Obama ever suggest _anything_ that would lead anyone to ever
> > > believe he was a civil libertarian?
>
> > NO, Obama led me to believe that he was a Socialist Authoritarian...
> > and it turns out I was correct.
>
> > and it turns out I was correct.
>
> Then there's been no deception other than looneytarians who should be
> called servitudetarians.
If you say so.
> called servitudetarians.
snicker
Werner
Jun 21, 2013, 7:17:01 AM6/21/13
to
Then you need to understand voters are responsible for the condition of the country.
http://www.EmdIt.info
http://www.EmdIt.info
Deja Vu
Jun 21, 2013, 7:36:05 AM6/21/13
to
he will go down in history as the worst president and his central planning policies will destroy the dollar and reduce the states to a developing nation status
learn how to speak chinese now!
0 new messages