The myth of social democracy- only National Secularism will prevent WW3.
dev carter
WW3.
=======================================================
The rot was set in the constitutional foundation stone of our
pretentious 'so called' democracies of the west. But few would have
realized that fact, given the great silence on the subject of equity
of financial burden under an asecular capitalist system. Sans
constitutional protection of a national interest, in 2009 as the rich
get richer, the plutocratic system reaches its tipping point and
totters at the point of collapse.
How did the nations of the west get us to this point?
As the rich got richer, the poor got debt - mountains of it. What the
plutocrats perceived correctly was that the underclass was a bad risk
and would never be able to repay capital and interest given the fact
that the purchasing power of their income would be whittled away by
price increases. The new game in town was to unload the risk by
securitization of debt that could be flogged to any sucker willing to
hold it- particular given the fact that another sucker might be found
to underwrite the sale by insuring the risk of default. When the
plutocratic vultures have consumed all the available wealth of their
indigenous underclass- there are only two other sources of wealth for
plutocratic vultures - one wing flies in the direction of geopolitical
resources (such as Iraqi Oil) and the other in the direction of the
opportunistic appropriation of the assets of the gullible- including
those of other lesser plutocrats.
Historically governments without constitutional authority to protect
national interests have not acted to achieve social outcomes, save the
impact of disease and foreign occupation that would threaten all, but
have legislated to protect the rich and expanded their interests by
pushing asecular ideology from the pulpit to the public arena-
maintaining the general mass ignorance by silence, omission, and
disingenuous rhetoric.
You must understand what asecularism 'is' in order to understand
history and how the masters of plutocratic ideology rule in order to
understand the plutocratic system.
The asecularist's goal is to create a widespread mass cultural belief
that it is something other than genetic nature, social nurture or
environment which explains what humans actually do. The asecularist's
goal is to manufacture superstitious myths concerning human acts that
may be exploited for other ends. If the masses can be brainwashed to
believe in 'evil', then reactionaries may exploit that belief in power
plays for their own ends, using the ideological zealot as an
instrument of power. Having manufactured 'evil' as some amorphous
non-specific generalized abnormality of human kind, zealots react to
the individual perceived to be corrupted by 'evil' as no logical
alternative is conceptually made available to them within their
particular worldview. Plutocrats rule by this labeling process that
associates a given existential threat with evil and builds the
requisite reactionary institutions to deal with such threats. The
asecular concepts of 'crime' and 'terror' are created for mass
indoctrination, only then do the agents of plutocracy deal with the
existential threat of 'criminals' and 'terrorists'.
Naturally, the goal of secularism is to explain all of human history
in terms of human genetic nature, nurture and environment and build a
world order based on secular enlightenment. In contrast plutocracy
milks asecularism for all its worth because any objective mass
understanding of reality represents a very serious existential danger
to its power.
It is in plutocracy's interests to conserve asecular beliefs such as
monotheist religion- to maintain creationism and prayer in private
schools, rather than teach science and evolution, to push theist
concepts of 'evil' from the pulpit out into the broader institutional
realm, as these are instruments for the purpose of protecting private
property and plutocratic class interests. Asecular prophesy can also
be exploited to create foreign policies favorable to plutocratic wars
of neo-imperial expansion, by exploiting a future according to a
profitable interpretation of tracts of biblical prophesy. Plutocratic
funding for the militant Zionist Greater Israel project illustrates
how asecular prophesy may be exploited for financial gain.
Prophesy gives the plutocrat the requisite ideological brainwashing to
pursue and extended their geopolitical resource grab- even when the
goal of securing strategic interests is purely illusory as in Iraq.
The rationale becomes on of protecting the interest of one allies in
the Greater Israel project- the state of Israel.
But one should never underestimate the capacity of the militarist
wing of plutocracy to destabilize for profitable exploitation of
conflict- to ensure their billion dollar weapons system investments
are deployed to conflict zones such as Palestine, Iraq, and
Afghanistan. Militarist foreign policy seeks further escalation into
Iran and Pakistan in keeping with the Zionist Wolfowitz plans for a US
global empire, the chief foreign policy strategy created by the
Zionist neo-con movement.
With Britain and the USA embarking upon the money printing policies
that created a fascist Nazi Germany following the hyper-inflation that
eliminated the middle class, one wonders if they are locked into some
fantastic asecularist fantasy - that Israel, the USA and Europe is
doomed without WW3 due to population implosion in the West- that a
thermonuclear world war of genocidal proportions is essential to
re-establish a viable neo-imperial European Judeo-Christian hegemony
and supremacy. In other words the Zionist have convinced the US
leadership, that militarism is the only option due to the decline of
the USA's technological supremacy and manufacturing base- that the
nuclear bomb is the answer, not profitable trade in a global economy.
If this were the case, their intermediate target would be the wealth
of entrepreneurs who compete with the plutocratic multinational
corporation, whose private saving create most of the common jobs for
the indigenous masses, the very keystone of the existing class system
that separates the plutocrats and the bourgeoisie from the underclass
of low-paid workers and unemployed. The existing crisis could not have
been better devised to eliminate the wealth of the entrepreneur
depending on bank loans for survival as it was almost guaranteed to
destroy the banking and financial system and eliminate the
entrepreneurial class. Has Bernie Madeoff qualified for the Star of
David award for his contribution to a Zionist inspired WW3?
It may well be possible that the Plutocrats have manufactured the
current crisis for this very purpose- to create the economic
conditions for the collapse of social order in order to make
totalitarian presidential rule an absolute necessity. Under Bush all
the techniques and apparatus of totalitarianism were trialed- from
concentration camps in Cuba and elsewhere to the remote political
assassination of deemed enemies, to the mass electronic surveillance
of the communication networks of ordinary citizens. In lock step with
Bush, the Zionist escalated their militant terror campaigns in Lebanon
and Palestine using US supplied tanks, aircraft, missiles and bombs
against the civilian population.
Needless to say, both wings of plutocracy are in serious trouble due
to the zeal with which plutocratic militarists manufactured a global
war out of the militant acts of a mere handful of Islamic radicals,
and the vast liquidity created to attempt to restore confidence and
normalcy in the US economy after the Islamic 9/11 attack.. This money
went on to create the housing bubble and subsequent maneuvers by the
clever plutocrats with the inside knowledge as to the true state of
affairs to offload risk of default completely or spread that risk
abroad to the global economy.
No pundit will tell the truth that asecularist militarism breeds
asecularist reprisals, that decades of neo-imperial militancy by the
USA have created Islamic radicalism and resistance. The plutocrats
don't want you to know anything about their neo-imperial militarist
policies because to do so would be to admit that such action result in
subsequent events impacting all US citizenry- like 9/11.
The plutocratic propagandists created their concept of "terror" as yet
another attribute of the 'evildoers' in order to keep the masses
uninformed and their asecular ideology for militarist profiteering
intact and unquestioned.
As plutocracy totters as a consequence of its past acts, its political
stooges must nuance their disingenuous rhetoric further by novel
overlays. While preserving most of the underlying ideological
substance, we are now told that more 'regulation' characterized as a
trend towards a post-neo-liberal social democracy is the elixir
required to restore the equilibrium between 'private incentive' and
'public responsibility'.
If only reality was this simple and the plutocrats could wave a magic
wand to shore up their empire, but of course it isn't.
What the plutocrats failed to tell you, was that plutocratic
militarism build during the cold war would mutate following its end-
anti-communist ideology being replaced by anti-Islamic ideology to
garner the hatred necessary for war profiteering on a massive scale.
Wars that never end founded on religious hatred were conceived to mean
that the profit stream would never end. Theist entities such as
Zionist Israel ensured the asecularism necessary for a unending
militarist neo-imperial opportunism by the Anglo-Saxon gang of 3 - the
USA and its allies, Britain and Australia. While most national
governments sought the normalization of Israeli-Palestinian relations
via a one or two state solution, the militarists wanted to continue
the conflict to demonstrate militarist supremacy and neo-imperial
power via the Bush roadmap to nowhere. But when vast sums are diverted
from the non-military economy into plutocratic profits streams, some
incomes and infrastructure will suffer chronic cut-backs and the
underclass is fleeced of saving and real entrepreneurial profits from
the pursuit of normal business activities disappear as the revenue
stream dries up.
Increasingly, the under class take the short end of the straw when
chronic militarism diminishes public surpluses and replaces them with
public debt, while the war profiteers reap the spoils of conflict
directly from the public purse. In the plutocratic west of today the
major beneficiaries are not men who depend on regular work paying an
average wage to raise families but the privileged classes rewarded by
the stooges of the plutocratic order holding political office. Their
job is to favorably nuance or contextualize "downturns" for the
plutocrats to restore faith in the system of class relations they are
charged with perpetuating. When mass ignorance of the real power
behind the politicians is ensured, the plutocrats may monitor their
faith in the perpetuation of the systems objectives, their pursuit of
a non-threatening social and fiscal policy orthodoxy- their zeal in
protecting plutocratic interests from systemic failure. It they don't
toe the plutocratic line, plutocracy has the resources to mount the
mass media political campaigns guaranteed to undermine and exclude the
unconvincing stooge from political office.
The politician in the plutocracies has become a do nothing tax-cutier
and little else.
So in reality what the west faces is a constitutional crisis - the
plutocrats now own the governments of the west. One is never going to
get a meaningful explanation of the current crisis from a politician.
The difference between Bush and Obama is purely about the pace of the
asecular plutocratic neo-imperial expansion, not about its substance
or strategic direction.
When you ask the lackey politician of any social democratic political
party how much an aged pensioner ought to pay in rent for viable
accommodation as a percentage of average weekly earnings, they have no
answer because they have no policies whatsoever to protect the income
levels of the underclass at a viable level. All their efforts are
directed towards protecting the assets and income levels of the rich -
the plutocrats, bourgeoisie and upper middle class wage earners by the
systematic privatization of public assets and transfer of surpluses to
the private sector. What the stooges of plutocracy won't say is that
raising income for the underclass after the currency is debased
doesn't help them, as the power to raise prices is firmly in the hands
of the plutocrats and bourgeoisie. All increases are gouged away in
price raisings.
Instead of positing a true reality, they posit the fiction of but two
extremes- a choice between the theist right wing unregulated
Thatcherism for the rich versus some tyrannical atheistic Socialism
for the poor against the rich. This is the old trickle down ultra
neo-liberal market economy or a totalitarian Marxist alternative.
Their phony third alternative is now to propose a more regulated
Thatcherism a kind of mandate that will prohibit all loans to the
underclass- the credit unworthy with no insight into how big that
class will be as the dust settles on their current wars and risk
exporting activities.
No mention is made of a third alternative- national secularism, a
natural radically centrist philosophy which places the long term
viability of the state front and center while bringing the essential
equilibrium of power to all the classes by national constitutional
reform- the essential factor in making any so called free market
economy truly free.
What is the cause of the plutocratic vulture's need to export risk?
When the plutocrats need funding for a war they seek others to pay for
it. One source is to permit or facilitate drug cultivation in war
zones such as Afghanistan, so that heroin drug profits from Europe
become the cash crop for the private building of services and
infrastructure in Afghanistan, as a consequence, the occupying power
does not need to provide such services. This is an indirect tax on
Europe. Dumping the risk of securitized debt that has no hope of being
paid abroad also is effectively a tax on Europe by spreading the loss
as widely as possible.
In ordinary times, all the fuss of the current plutocratic crisis
would have been explained away- it would have been characterized as "a
recession that we all had to have" one that would be needed to take
the heat out of an overheated economy. This one is different in that
the plutocratic system is essentially unstable given the debasement of
currency in the West around the mid to late 1960-early 1970's as
worthless nickel replace silver and undermined the intrinsic value of
the money supply. Australian history illustrates the process that
occurred throughout the west.
When Australians were paid in silver coinage, the plutocrats and the
corrupt union movement could not inflate away the value of real wages.
Today the silver value of your 1966 average weekly pay packet of $128
dollars is $1920 on eBay when sold as silver coin- about twice current
average weekly earnings and 15 times its face value.
In contrast, the value of plutocracies debased currency in paper money
or nickel coinage is still just $128. a mere fraction of current
Australian average weekly earnings of $900-1000 per week and 15 times
below its pre-debasement value. So while only a fraction of the
Australian workforce kept pace with inflation- the vast majority took
a pay cut following currency debasement under all of Australia's
plutocratic regimes in power thereafter. A similar fall in real income
occurred during the 1920s prior to the stock market crash of the 1929
upon the heals of which the Great Depression immediately followed..
Unless the citizens of a nation are paid in hard currency backed by a
desired asset, there is no incentive to save, and the plutocrats and
their quislings and stooges will be quick to play tricky poo handing
over freshly printed but otherwise valueless paper currency in wages
which they will print like monopoly money so far as they are able to
get away with it. History attests to this fact whether on not you call
the plutocratic state 'neo-liberal free market' or 'social democratic
free market' a debased currency doesn't change. To keep any market
"free" national secularism needs to watch the thieving hand of the
plutocrats, their stooges and their shylocks and restore the real
value of money.
What they are exploiting is the perception that the price of things is
always going to go up, so the suckers are told that unless they sign
up to the offered deal, they'll be the looser and will miss out.
Holding money or bonds whose underlying nickel value will be easily
inflated away is no longer an asset but a liability. When debt was
securitized in financial packages, holding stock in the companies now
holding the debt or insuring the risk was also equally as great a
liability- if not more so given the risk to other business activities.
If national governments with debased currencies carry this hot potato,
they will be next to face the calamity of confidence as reality bites
down to the bone and marrow - with the prospect of rampant inflation
turning into hyper-inflation. If the plutocrats are on their merry
path to WW3, printing money is almost guaranteed to get them there if
the history of the rise of German fascism is their guide.
When the nation state creates and maintains a currency with intrinsic
worth, prices may fluctuate around a mean according to supply and
demand. Increased private savings during an economic upswing may be
utilized to cushion the financial burden on any downturn so a
long-term equilibrium is maintainable. However, when the currency is
debased and easily printed, it becomes a power scramble to raise
prices, the plutocrats and the major unions maintain purchasing power
by their privileged position- the rest fall behind.
This process is at work in all the western countries with debased
currencies. In the USA, as the plutocrats in the top 1% have taken 13%
more of the national income pie than they took back in 1980, the
outsider classes could no longer save and were left with little choice
other than to borrow heavily in order to play catch up with the
'winner status' middle class life style. The debasement of the
currency by this time was seen by the plutocrats and the big unions
with industrial muscle to bargain as an ideal foundation for regular
price raises and regular negotiated wage increases.
The entrepreneurial economy and those that depended on it were left
out in the cold with the plutocratic liberalizations founded on the
debasement of the currency. The potential for the wholesale collapse
of the entrepreneurial economy is now what's driving the current panic
agendas of the stooges in office. The entrepreneurial economy needs
investment capital to support the funding of new business startups as
older entrepreneurs of the baby boomer generation begin to retire
en-mass in the next 5 years. The stooges of plutocracy have wiped out
more than 20% of the youthful Australian population with feminist
inspired 'abortion on demand' legislation of decades ago. In real
numbers that's about 4 million young Australians.
A plutocratic regime of ever increasing 'tax-cuts for the rich' and a
viable pension for the ever increasing aged poor is fiscally
impossible in the long run. Indeed, plutocratic governments in
Australia privatized pensions by creating compulsory superannuation-
throwing away all responsibility for managing retirement incomes in
the national interest.
What is in store for the new underclass when the fiscal conservatives
purge Thatcherism of deregulation under the banner of post-neo-liberal
social democracy, is ultimately credit unworthiness for up to 25 % of
the western population and ultimately a new favela ghetto culture in
the developed world. This is the new social infrastructure project
promised by the gang of 3's response to plutocracy on the brink,
namely, the poor in our new post-meltdown society will just have to
face the reality of being poorer- that is before their being drafted
into the armed services for participation in WW3.
Given the scale of the disaster the plutocrats have visited on the
nation state, their stooges have resorted to public debt funded
"stimulus plans" and new terms by which to paint a happier face on the
stark plutocratic reality but almost immediately, as usual, inflation
is clawing away the value of the handouts from those who need them
most..
It appears that henceforth "neo-liberalism" under the gang of 3 will
be known as "social democracy" and the plutocrats will keep their
billions and their theist tainted neo-imperial foreign wars, their
quislings there bonuses for services rendered, but the impoverished
Joe Bloggs of this world will get an ever smaller shorter straw- with
a public debt and interest burden hung around his neck and ever
diminishing slice of the income pie to make ends meet.
Since all social democracies devoid of constitutional protection where
money politics plays its subversive hand become corrupt absolutely,
the third way that the stooges of plutocracy won't tell you about is
national secularism because it is the only alternative that preserves
a viable market economy in the long term national interest.
Perhaps a movement for a secular Australia needs to become the tail
that waves the Anglo-Saxon dog as the pom and yank are clearly lost in
plutocratic asecular delusion.
Secular political systems relate ends and means for the market economy
so that outcomes are achievable and inflation controlled. A hard
currency is founded upon an asset that cannot easily be undermined by
class exploitation and the deflating away of debt. If one ties a debt
to a commodity value this type of corruption becomes impossible, as
payment may be asked for in the equivalent value of the commodity-
gold, silver, uranium etc. Possibly a value based on a basket of high
value commodities is what is necessary.
We do not permit the double parking of vehicles in the common
throughfare, why permit the double parking of assets in private hands
against the national interest of maintaining a viable free market? If
a major asset is not being employed for the purpose it was designed
for, it needs to be requisitioned by secular regimes and utilized for
that purpose- by the development of, or by lease or sale of the asset
to an end user. This would drive prices to a rational equilibrium. The
proceeds, after management costs are deducted going to the owner.
Extortion is impossible if the alienation of assets by the plutocrats
and bourgeoisie is prevented and market forces allowed to function in
the national interest. The vast tracts of vacant housing and business
property must be employed in the national interest to lower the costs
of living to the masses and to the cost of doing business by
entrepreneurial employers in the domestic economy.
The Europeans fought constantly for thousands of years until weapons
grade plutonium created the requisite balance of fear- that in any
future European war there would be no winners. The militarist thugs
in the current gang of 3 prefer to kill mothers and babies in their
terror campaigns, rather than tackle nuclear armed adversaries. When
other states are potentially militarily equally empowered, they will
desist from geopolitical adventurism and alternatives to militarist
aggression will become mandatory. Only then will meaningful and
gradual world disarmament ever become possible.
Plutonium created the EU and the euro and cooperation between the
European states.
Australia needs to enrich uranium and become a player in the
international sphere for both economic and demographic survival.
Plutonium may be out best commodity both for world peace and easing
reliance on fossil fuels. Making it available to all nation states and
redirecting most military spending towards environmental alternatives-
such as reversing the effects of climate change by a more sustainable
use of energy- solar, wind and nuclear. Perhaps only nuclear energy
will cut greenhouse gasses by a substantial amount within 30 years,
and the world may need a unified global effort to share nuclear
technology and resources to achieve this end.
The restoration of viable female fertility rates and the population
balance is a major imperative of national secularism in the west. A
national secular state must promote conditions for a return of female
fertility rates to a population replacement level of 2.1. When
Australia had hard currency based on gold and silver values, there was
a healthy national birthrate. Following debasement of the currency
that rate fell below replacement level and has remained there ever
since. If the value of wages in absolute purchasing power terms is
half that of what it was - birth rates are destined to fall as
individuals cannot earn enough discretionary purchasing power in
available wages to acquire the extra assets necessary to support
family life and raise a requisite number of children.
National secularism must turn this around immediately by making it
more difficult to procure abortion. In the longer term when the value
of wages is restored these emergencies measure may be able to be
relaxed. For this goal of restoration of fertility rates to be
achieve a fetus is a entity of value to the state and we would accord
each fetus the requisite level of value- children, infants and fetuses
below the age of puberty need to be accorded the same status as
prepubescent-offspring, human life is thus realistically conceived to
start at conception.
In a national secular state the termination of the life of
prepubescent-offspring will be negatively sanctioned unless a right to
euthanasia is formally applied for and a license sought by genitor and
genatrix, and endorsed by each living maternal grandparent. Genitor,
genatrix or maternal grandparents may elect to raise an offspring as
their own independently after its birth and carry or share the cost of
doing so. The scale of the sanction needs to be increased to a level
that maintains viable female fertility rates.
If one raises the value level of offspring, whether genitor or
genatrix are married is irrelevant. What is relevant is the income
level of all classes and the value of wages to sustain the cost of
raising on average 2.1 children per fertile genatrix. The secular
states role is to intervene in the control of resources and
relationships in order to achieve supply side outcomes so that
financial targets are achievable for all classes throughout their life
cycle. To achieve this goal a national secular state needs control
over the market economy by a requisite licensing system as mentioned
above that prevents the alienation of resources but not outright
ownership of them. In a secular state, there will be variations of
wealth but not life threatening ones as currently is the case under
our present regimes of asecular plutocracy.
To do nothing about female fertility rates is to doom the white
population of the West among others, to ultimate virtual
non-existence. Robbing Peter to pay Paul with baby bonuses and housing
grants is corrupt plutocratic middle-class welfare that even in boom
times shifted the fertility rate up only 0.1 %. - in Australia from
1.7 to 1.8 nowhere near enough to maintain a viable female fertility
rate. In the current recession / depression, it will plummet to levels
approaching that of the Italians and Japanese as the economic effects
of the gang of 3's rash militarism of past decades comes home to
roost.
Another major job for national secularism is to get government out of
the business of the moral micro-management of plutocracies internal
diversionary wars. In time the old hatreds will be mitigated by
ensuring all children of a secular state receive a 100% secular
education. Plutocracy's game during the past century is one of
camouflaging its own activities by creating a series of ideological
conflicts upon which to build campaigns for public hysteria and then
to engineer political quasi paramilitary campaigns of eradication -
hence we have the war on drugs, the war on crime, the war on male
violence in marriage, and the war on sexual abuse.
While the suckers who took their bait were fighting such diversionary
wars, the plutocrat slept well- there was no need to worry, given
there was no more cash in the public till, for a war on ignorance,
poverty and disenfranchisement. The plutocratic press and media
channels would have a field day with spin, gossip, alarm and moral
outrage over this or that hot topic event in the spotlight but never
would the masses be exposed to the potential shock of an objective
view of reality in the mass media and in film. The seemingly
uncontrollable seismic event of collapsing banks and financial
institutions is now a major challenge to explain as they have been
robbed of any viable technical terms that explain it- so we here terms
such as 'meltdown' or 'tsunami' being applied to the plutocratic
destruction.
In the secular world view there is no need for moral outrage, it is
wasted emotion based on fantasy. If a river floods one builds a dam.
If the river is full of sharks and crocodiles one puts up suitable
warning signs or moves them elsewhere. If individuals enter into a
relationship with their social environment, it is their responsibility
to assess the risk of doing so and face the consequences of a bad
choice. Only national secularism can teach individuals that the
evolutionary laws are not suspended by the old moral edicts of
asecularists but apply to all - fools who follow plutocracy's lead
towards short term opportunistic maximization of wealth and
gratification believing that their personal guardian angel will
protect them are destined for life's hard lessons and biological
natural selection.
National secularist need to be concerned with real things such as a
human life created by genitor and genatrix and leave abstract
theoretical entities such as 'marriage' in the mind of the beholder as
defined by their particular secularist or asecularist sub-cultural
worldview. Secularists will perceive human socio-sexual bonds
differently to asecularists brainwashed by religious dogma.
Billions are saved by legislating protocols for the care of
pre-pubescent offspring giving equal rights to genitor and genatrix.
In the case of post-pubescent offspring the offspring ought to have a
vote where they would choose to reside for primary care- genitor,
genatrix or with a maternal or paternal grandparent if circumstances
warrant their inclusion in cases of relationship breakdown. The
secular rights of Joe Bloggs as genitor, to acquire assets and produce
children are enhanced only if he has equal rights with a genatrix to
contract in his interest, is responsible for his own offspring, - not
the offspring of others, and the tax system is not used for class
welfare- the robbing of Peter to pay Paul.
The question arises as to what asecular freedoms of association and
action should be granted to asecularists in a secular state- should
those deemeded asecularly insane manage their own madhouse?. Should
adult Muslims be permitted to practice Sharia law amongst themselves,
or a willing adult Roman catholic to be subject to the Inquisitional
authority of the Pope? What role might secular apostasy play for those
who wanted out of their asecular religious sect in order to escape its
draconian punishment- such as being burnt at the stake or beheaded for
some perceived moral sin. The secular states role is to insist that
children receive a 100% secular education and that the right of
apostasy be a universal secular human right that is always available
at any time- even to asecularists.
When asecular genitor and genatrix would seek a contract to include a
religious clause in their contractual agreement- such as a
proscriptions for this and the proscription of that, it ought to be a
relevant religious court run and payed for by believers who determines
the merits of the claims of both disputants and the value of the
penalty deemed reasonable by that court such as excommunication and so
forth. Asecular ideology has no place in a secular system or its
contractual arrangements because it is founded on a belief that the
same cause can have different outcomes- human will being the decisive
factor in choosing one or another option. The secularist consciousness
frees a state of moral superstition and associated hysteria, and
always believes that a variation of evolutionary conditions, known or
unknown determines outcomes.
Thus plutocracy's dominion over the state is not a moral crisis, it is
the evolutionary outcome of a power struggles it has won temporarily-
at a cost carried by the underclass and its foreign victims. Empires
come and empires go- it is only a matter of time as facts and
circumstances as sufficient conditions change outcomes.
Natural human societies are built on sharing and non-coercive free
markets for the exchange of goods and services. National secularism
needs to assist the entrepreneurial class in their struggle to compete
with the plutocratic multi-national corporation.
Building up the entrepreneurial sector that creates new enterprises
for Australian workers is essential and there needs to be a shift of
manufacturing into Australian free trade zones to help Australian
entrepreneurs compete with plutocratic multinational slave wage
factories offshore.
Most of the territory adjacent to Australia's principal ports needs to
be transformed into closed free trade zone where domestic
entrepreneurs may invest a dollar for every dollar invested in the
domestic economy and pay international pay rates using local trainees
seeking to acquire skills or foreign guest workers hired at an
international pay level.
There is no solution to the decline in Australian manufacturing
without such action or redressing the chronic balance of payments
problem. If Australia is to become the leader of the Anglo-Saxon
world, manufacturing must be preserved for long term economic and
security goals. Free trade zones are essential to achieve this end,
and help to safeguard against the raising of tariffs or other
protectionist measured to restore full time employment. This second
tier of manufacturing policy would help restore the balance the
economic power across the class divide. Having a highly profitable
free trade zone, would create more cash for entrepreneurial investment
and job creation in niche areas of the domestic economy.
The plutocrats via their multinational corporations seek to
manufacture in the low wage countries and sell in the higher wage
economies without true competition from domestic entrepreneurial
competitors and have corrupted government policies to get favorable
import tariffs to do so, as a consequence their income has naturally
risen in recent decades while that of competitors and average wage
earners has fallen. As the debt burden from constant borrowing to
finance national trade imbalances grows, the real threat to economic
stability will come when the holders of the bonds, no longer are
prepared to do so. This is the real economic meltdown that militant
asecularism has charted for the nations of the west- guaranteed to
produce the ideal conditions for global military conflict from which
they hope to earn some profit while keeping themselves out of harms
way. As the leadership of the gang of 3 became collectively fixated on
victory or death, a madness overcomes their reasoning- their faculties
are totally dominated by propaganda and its ideological stereotypes.
Thus we witness no mention of the downsides in neo-imperialism or the
downside in the gross shift in assets into the plutocrat's coffers.
Why would the quislings and stooges of plutocracy mention such
matters? Their goal is to implement a kind of plutocratic Fourth Reich
where the rich will keep their profits and the masses will be lumbered
for eternity with their debts and the ongoing cost of foreign wars and
financial bailouts for a chosen few wounded 'insider' corporations
that on reflection are now considered too important to the domestic
plutocratic establishment to fail..
When a national guard is shooting the underclass demonstrators in the
streets and favelas, you will know all you need to know about the myth
of your new "post neo-liberal social democracy".
What the quislings and stooges of plutocracy won't tell you about is
just how much of plutocratic profits is transferred offshore by price
manipulations to ultimately end up in their Swiss bank accounts. The
plutocrats and quislings are never veracity tested, never
water-bordered, grilled under hot lights or loud music for days or
weeks or years at a time to extract the truth but are allowed to do as
they please under the ever increasing prospect of more tax cuts from
the beneficent hand of their quisling sympathizers and stooges in
political office.
Whether these call their market economy neo-liberal or post
neo-liberal social democracy, is all ideological nuance- the
plutocratic system remains the same. The solution to mega salaries in
the hundreds of millions for the executives of the plutocratic
corporations is called progressive taxation, not more of the same
meaningless posturing and moralizing, and finger pointing inaction
from the stooge and quisling classes.
It is fine for the underclass to loose all of their discretionary
income in taxation ( the income after meeting basic costs- rent, food,
energy, transportation, medical and dental costs) under plutocracy but
no so for the plutocrats- the plutocrats discretionary income belongs
to the plutocrats themselves- not to the tax man, not to the internal
revenue stream and ultimately never to become a state asset and a
resource to fund state intervention in the economy.
Only national secularism demonstrates that confidence starts at a
grass roots level and is build upward unlike the plutocratic
ideological fiction of the trickle down of wealth from above.
National secularism is the only force ideologically equipped to
implement the true changes needed for an evolutionary viable economic
system, since it alone is concerned with the requisite end first and
foremost then the means to arrive at desired outcomes not as some
ideological tenet of theist or plutocratic belief but a simple
practical desire for the on going viability of one's nation state.
Under national secularism favelas are impossible, under asecularism
they are a commonplace because prayers and chronic genuflection, or
wars against phantom enemies are no substitute for concrete
disciplined action.
It is a matter of social policy that pension levels might be at least
half average weekly wages. It is a matter of social policy that
residential rents would be on average 20% of average weekly earnings
and that all medical and dental cost would be insurable by the outlay
of no more than 20% of average weekly earnings. You know a plutocratic
quisling in public office because he or she has no answer to such
questions. They are full of sanctimonious hopes and prayers for the
Australian destitute and homeless, full of moral outrage against the
greedy and uncaring, but bereft of any concrete pragmatic policies
that create an alternative order to their limp wrist post neo-liberal
social democracy that has no agenda for any meaningful change on
outcomes generally, or taxation burden in particular.
How a state deals with the poorest of the poor, at the grass roots
level, is fundamental to confidence building, as confidence flows from
bottom up.
A massive boost to national secularism will come from cutting out the
rotten wood by a fundamental secular modernization- gutting of the old
plutocratic institutions such as the legal system and its meaningless
wars against phantom enemies and the building of new secular
institutions that deal with objective realities from scratch. The real
test is whether an act enhances the public interest for harmonious
relations and long term stability in the national interest or is
contrary to them. Carrots and sticks are necessary to regulate
optimally but the state should do so at minimal cost to eliminate
waste and declines in productivity- using veracity testing and truth
drugs if necessary to establish matters of fact.
Corrupt legal systems exists because only the plutocrats and the
bourgeoisie have the financial resources to gain favorable access to
them- not so the lower middle and underclass- it is grand
protectionism for the super rich classes at its worst. Billions are
squandered protecting their theist legalist charades- and the hordes
of parasitic sub-professions that feed off them.
While national secularism builds houses with bricks and mortar, feeds
bellies with bread and beverage by mandatory action for real
currencies, the plutocratic state disowns all responsibility by buck
passing between state and federal entities, time wasting reports of
enquiry into the obvious, going soft on inflationary embezzlement,
fiscal abandonment by budget cutting tax cuts and any suitable and
available rhetoric for inaction and the privatization of national
responsibilities.
Cigarette smoking and other dangerous drug use illustrates what a
rational secular state would insist on. Zero advertising both direct
and indirect in the media and the licensed sale to registered addicts.
The scale of addiction of addicts would be recorded and used to
determine the actuarial adjustments to the cost of an addict's health
insurance premium.
The key concept is that non-smoking, tea-totaling Joe Bloggs is not
slugged by tax hikes to support the increased health costs associated
with the risk taking of others. The whole plutocratic system is one
founded on the act of avoiding responsibility- of milking benefits for
the insiders while passing the burden of paying for them onto
outsiders. The same process might be also used in controlling chronic
obesity in the overweight population or anorexia in the underweight
population using personal BMI to determine insurance premiums. Keeping
the rate low for people in the normal BMI range, creates a carrot that
motivates individuals to change their behavior in the national
interest of a healthier workforce.
The plutocrats have used the culture wars to push asecular ideology
into most seemingly secular spheres to draw public attention away from
their own profit seeking agendas. National secular states must guard
against the potential for asecular ideals being misrepresented as
secular norms as more often than not a secular state will then waste
vast sums of public money chasing invisible moral phantoms. The
foundation of a market economy is to secure one's wants and ultimately
one's needs by the process of offer and acceptance. It is not the
asker for a deal to ensure that the consideration is in the acceptors
favor- that is for acceptors to determine as best they can under
caveat emptor. Thus, there is no ideal win-win situation as future
events tend to make a contract more favorable to one side or the
other. What a secular state must prevent is subversion of the market
by the more powerful market players- the wholesale corruption of the
free market system as we have witness under plutocratic capitalism
particularly in the nation states or the gang of 3.
The function of the national secular state is to restore the honesty
and integrity of the market system by restoring the value of money and
the progressive secular modernization of the dysfunctional plutocratic
asecular institutions that have now brought the world economy to a
point where it totters on the brink of total collapse.
Secular Australia should lead the world and demonstrate to all nation
states that the plutocratic march towards WW3 by the old gang of 3 is
not the only political option available to the Western nations in
their quest for evolutionary survival.
Dev Carter