Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Instead of Gun Control: More Private Security

5 views
Skip to first unread message

MattB

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 3:57:20 PM7/23/12
to
Instead of Gun Control: More Private Security

http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-07-23/instead-of-gun-control-more-private-security

The movie theater massacre in Aurora, Colo. has provoked the usual
calls for stricter gun control. Surely, liberals argue, we can do
without 100-round drum magazines such as the one the Colorado killer
is said to have used. The National Rifle Association, once it comes
out of its bunker to respond, will oppose any and all new gun control
laws.

Then, nothing will happen. There are many reasons nothing will happen,
as I�ve written, most recently, here and, earlier, here. The most
telling sign that nothing will happen is that President Barack Obama,
a believer in strong gun control laws, has remained mute and
motionless on the topic�after the Tucson supermarket spree in January
2011, and now, again, after Aurora.

The political costs to Democrats are too high�a good thing or an
infuriating thing, depending on your views of the Second Amendment,
self-protection, and the meaning of firearms in American culture.


*************************

Property trained security isn't cheap and rent-a-cops might be more
dangerous in the long run.

John Doe

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 4:30:28 PM7/23/12
to
MattB <trdell1234NOMORESPAM gmail.com> wrote:

> Instead of Gun Control: More Private Security

Another something that would help... Don't take your six-year-old
daughter to a movie theater after midnight...

Sid9

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:09:54 PM7/23/12
to

"MattB" <trdell1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:juar08hsm59670pa9...@4ax.com...
> Instead of Gun Control: More Private Security
>
> http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-07-23/instead-of-gun-control-more-private-security
>
> The movie theater massacre in Aurora, Colo. has provoked the usual
> calls for stricter gun control. Surely, liberals argue, we can do
> without 100-round drum magazines such as the one the Colorado killer
> is said to have used. The National Rifle Association, once it comes
> out of its bunker to respond, will oppose any and all new gun control
> laws.
>
> Then, nothing will happen. There are many reasons nothing will happen,
> as I've written, most recently, here and, earlier, here. The most
> telling sign that nothing will happen is that President Barack Obama,
> a believer in strong gun control laws, has remained mute and
> motionless on the topic-after the Tucson supermarket spree in January
> 2011, and now, again, after Aurora.
>
> The political costs to Democrats are too high-a good thing or an
> infuriating thing, depending on your views of the Second Amendment,
> self-protection, and the meaning of firearms in American culture.
>
>
> *************************
>
> Property trained security isn't cheap and rent-a-cops might be more
> dangerous in the long run.

Good idea

Charge gun owners a fee and use the funds to support your well trained
security forces.

MattB

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:16:35 PM7/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:09:54 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
wrote:
Don't think you could get that past Congress and you'd be giving the
Republicans the Presidency and Congress. You can try though. Many
Democrats own guns and have concealed weapons permits. You do mean
them too?




Message has been deleted

Sid9

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:41:39 PM7/23/12
to

"MattB" <trdell1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:sjfr08hiuvtcu4be7...@4ax.com...
Not for the USA.
Start in Colorado where Columbine and Aurora are fresh in their minds.
All gun owners.


Eddie Haskell

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:47:47 PM7/23/12
to

"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:jukgel$luk$1...@dont-email.me...
When we take over come Jan we're going to tax you for NOT a having a gun.

Enjoy.

-Eddie Haskell


MattB

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 5:56:47 PM7/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:41:39 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
Well you can try. Me I'd rather we have a little more control of the
selling of 100 round clips and such. What Yoorghis/Gary called a
"water gun Control" don't ask me his meaning.

Limited Gun Control many would support. Then again we seen to have a
camp that want a total ban.

Sid9

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 6:05:06 PM7/23/12
to

"MattB" <trdell1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:kphr08pvi4ejgkgkf...@4ax.com...
.
.
A total ban in the USA is IMPOSSIBLE.
It would no more effective than prohibition.

Every time I talk about sanity I'm charge as a gun grabber.
The "sanity" will have to come from gun owners, not me.

MattB.

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 7:05:59 PM7/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:05:06 -0400, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net>
It needs to come from both.

klattu

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 7:58:38 PM7/23/12
to
One White guy shoots fifty people at a theater, and the whole world
goes insane. Fifty Blacks shoot one to three people each over the
course of every weekend and nobody dares mention it.

3082 Dead

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 9:34:02 PM7/23/12
to
Says the simpering, whining little racist cunt who hopes nobody notices
that, thanks to the efforts of the NRA and America's gun culture, the US
does a 9/11 on itself every three weeks.

bobo fizmarkian

unread,
Jul 23, 2012, 10:07:15 PM7/23/12
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:58:38 -0400, klattu wrote:

The drug gang business is dangerous, like commercial fishing. Yet, both
provide a lot of jobs, and things people want. So, society accepts that
these industries are just dangerous.

Possibly, we should make liquor illegal again. This would provide many
more jobs than the current industry does. We need those jobs right now.




--
Bobo - (What's the Jive? Bird's alive!)

Boo

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 2:36:30 AM7/24/12
to
They'd be good jobs, but some of them involve shooting, bombing,
clubbing, people. Plus, bribing politicians, although that puts money
into circulation.


--
Boo Fetus Radley, II

Robert Fitzgerald

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 3:14:33 AM7/24/12
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 21:07:15 -0500, bobo fizmarkian wrote:

<snip>
>>
>>
>>
>> One White guy shoots fifty people at a theater, and the whole world
>> goes insane. Fifty Blacks shoot one to three people each over the
>> course of every weekend and nobody dares mention it.
>
> The drug gang business is dangerous, like commercial fishing. Yet, both
> provide a lot of jobs, and things people want. So, society accepts that
> these industries are just dangerous.
>
> Possibly, we should make liquor illegal again. This would provide many
> more jobs than the current industry does. We need those jobs right now.


I'm sorry, there's no way that an illegal liquor industry as per the
1920's will provide sufficient growth for this economy to prevent
disaster.

The illegal industry, in a certain sense, is like trying to "lift
yourself by your own bootstraps" (to use an old term) or "perpetual
motion" for another. It simply doesn't work, IMO.

The Austrian economists and Chicago School probably had the best,
basic ideas, IMO.

Not to say, illegal drug industry does no good, or the 1920's Capone
gang was all bad.

Some good Demonrat politicians came out of that, as I gather. Joseph
Kennedy - John Kennedy's father, is reputed to have been involved in
it. Seems likely, even without any info from history...

Not all bad, either.. IMO.

Kennedy also was a super-tax-cutter, so for the dem side, today would
be considered very very very evil.

he'd be a repugnant hero in some ways.

--
Bobby

Ruut66

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 11:24:15 AM7/24/12
to
On Jul 23, 11:09 pm, "Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote:
> "MattB" <trdell1234NOMORES...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:juar08hsm59670pa9...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > Instead of Gun Control: More Private Security
>
> >http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-07-23/instead-of-gun-contro...
>
> > The movie theater massacre in Aurora, Colo. has provoked the usual
> > calls for stricter gun control. Surely, liberals argue, we can do
> > without 100-round drum magazines such as the one the Colorado killer
> > is said to have used. The National Rifle Association, once it comes
> > out of its bunker to respond, will oppose any and all new gun control
> > laws.
>
> > Then, nothing will happen. There are many reasons nothing will happen,
> > as I've written, most recently, here and, earlier, here. The most
> > telling sign that nothing will happen is that President Barack Obama,
> > a believer in strong gun control laws, has remained mute and
> > motionless on the topic-after the Tucson supermarket spree in January
> > 2011, and now, again, after Aurora.
>
> > The political costs to Democrats are too high-a good thing or an
> > infuriating thing, depending on your views of the Second Amendment,
> > self-protection, and the meaning of firearms in American culture.
>
> > *************************
>
> > Property trained security isn't cheap and rent-a-cops might be more
> > dangerous in the long run.
>
> Good idea
>
> Charge gun owners a fee and use the funds to support your well trained
> security forces

Any gun is overrated for killing. My flyswatter does nicely.

R

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 11:44:42 AM7/24/12
to

"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:jukhqk$uis$1...@dont-email.me...
Hahahahaha!!!

I mean..

Bah hahahahaha!!!

-Eddie Haskell


Eddie Haskell

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 11:48:30 AM7/24/12
to

"3082 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:juku29$ci7$8...@dont-email.me...
Go fuck yourself.

"Oh, my, it must be so rough growing up white and male in America."

-2966 Dead, Friday, April 27, 2012 2:20 PM

"Well, he [Zimmerman] just shot and killed a kid for no reason at all."

-2915 Dead, Thursday, March 22, 2012 12:59 PM

"Oh, I think he [Zimmerman] should be convicted of manslaughter."

-2960 Dead, Saturday, April 14, 2012 7:40 PM

-Eddie Haskell




Eddie Haskell

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 11:49:24 AM7/24/12
to

"3082 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:juku29$ci7$8...@dont-email.me...
Eat shit and die in hell.

"Typical white person"

-Hussein

"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself."

-Hussein

Hussein's associations:

Rev. Wright, whose church Hussein attended and supported financially for
over
20 years:

"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."

Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Hussein to deliver the inaugural benediction:

"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."

Sonia Sotomayor, Hussein's pick for the SC:

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."

From Hussein's book:

"White man's greed runs a world in need."

Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.

Obama advisor Van Jones:

"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"

"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"

"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"

"Coates, who said he was testifying before the commission as a whistle
blower and in violation of his Justice supervisor's instructions, said that
there is a "hostile atmosphere" in the civil rights division that did not
"reflect race neutral policies." He said the country's major civil rights
organizations are also biased against race-neutral enforcement."

http://tinyurl.com/3x5ts8o

"In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over
the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther
Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil
rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white
victims. "

http://tinyurl.com/3x8q42h


-Eddie Haskell


Message has been deleted

3082 Dead

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 6:21:23 PM7/24/12
to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:32:12 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:

> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:48:30 -0500, "Eddie Haskell" <km...@plmges.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> Says the simpering, whining little racist
>>
>>Go fuck yourself.

Poor Eddie. He thinks ignorant dirtbags deserve respect and love, too.

MattB

unread,
Jul 24, 2012, 6:25:48 PM7/24/12
to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 22:21:23 +0000 (UTC), 3082 Dead <de...@gone.com>
wrote:

>On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 15:32:12 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 10:48:30 -0500, "Eddie Haskell" <km...@plmges.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Says the simpering, whining little racist
>>>
>>>Go fuck yourself.
>
>Poor Eddie. He thinks ignorant dirtbags deserve respect and love, too.

No Yoorghis and his type deserve no respect and love, just our pity.

Message has been deleted

Eddie Haskell

unread,
Jul 26, 2012, 2:19:20 PM7/26/12
to

"3082 Dead" <de...@gone.com> wrote in message
news:jun753$q7h$2...@dont-email.me...
No one thinks you deserve anything but disdain and hatred, you anti-American
socialist racist cocksucker.
0 new messages