>".MattB." <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote in message
>news:nm9un794thos7bbpnvji07flt4p60f0ncm@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 09:11:27 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
>> <hfhfh...@ssassw.com> wrote:

>>>".MattB." <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:j46sn7pk8ju1otkhnrn51k2rvmo8pcog48@4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 17:01:01 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
>>>> <hfhfh...@ssassw.com> wrote:

>>>>>".MattB." <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:fp4sn7tehjr1c0lhgo0s50etvddn7578f3@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:46:32 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
>>>>>> <hfhfh...@ssassw.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>".MattB." <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:vd4sn790abao0vhba6b67soca0h284qhb3@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 5 Apr 2012 16:28:02 -0500, "Eddie Haskell"
>>>>>>>> <hfhfh...@ssassw.com> wrote:

>>>>>>>>>".MattB." <trdell1...@Nomorespamgmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>news:223sn7h8cufarf25lg5vdlrl6usanhhnp2@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>>>> The Supreme Court's Contempt for Congress

>>>>>>>>>> It's well known by now that Donald Verrilli, Jr., the Solicitor
>>>>>>>>>> General, had an off day at the Supreme Court last Tuesday, when he
>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>> called on to defend the constitutionality of the individual
>>>>>>>>>> mandate,
>>>>>>>>>> the part of the Affordable Care Act which requires people to buy
>>>>>>>>>> health insurance. Still, it's worth noting the magnitude of the
>>>>>>>>>> challenge that he was facing. The key issue in the case is whether
>>>>>>>>>> Congress, in passing the law, exceeded its powers under the
>>>>>>>>>> Commerce
>>>>>>>>>> Clause of the Constitution, which allows the government to
>>>>>>>>>> regulate
>>>>>>>>>> interstate commerce. Consider, then, this question, posed to
>>>>>>>>>> Verrilli
>>>>>>>>>> by Justice Anthony M. Kennedy: "Assume for the moment that
>>>>>>>>>> this"-the
>>>>>>>>>> mandate-"is unprecedented, this is a step beyond what our cases
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> allowed, the affirmative duty to act to go into commerce. If that
>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>> so, do you not have a heavy burden of justification?" Every
>>>>>>>>>> premise
>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>> that question was a misperception. The involvement of the federal
>>>>>>>>>> government in the health-care market is not unprecedented; it
>>>>>>>>>> dates
>>>>>>>>>> back nearly fifty years, to the passage of Medicare and Medicaid.
>>>>>>>>>> The
>>>>>>>>>> forty million uninsured Americans whose chances for coverage are
>>>>>>>>>> riding on the outcome of the case are already entered "into
>>>>>>>>>> commerce,"
>>>>>>>>>> because others are likely to pay their health-care costs

>>>>>>>>>> ..........

>>>>>>>>>> No one expects the Justices to be making health-care policy any
>>>>>>>>>> more
>>>>>>>>>> than we expect them to be picking Presidents, which, it may be
>>>>>>>>>> remembered, is not exactly their strength, either. ?

>>>>>>>>>Except that it never happened, moron.

>>>>>>>>  Well maybe you had better write the write of the article.

>>>>>>>So you're now you're posting shit that you don't even believe, moron?

>>>>>>  Maybe I'm posting it to see what other people think.

>>>>>I think that you're a moron.

>>>>  I think you are just like Zepp.  That means a Moron is  slightly
>>>> above you both.  :-)))

>>>You think that because you're a moron.

>>   That is still way above You and Zepp.  Seems Republicans agree as
>> the Tea Party is going down in Flames.  Now we can focus on the other
>> Zepp in the White House.  Tea Party and Obama gone we might stand a
>> chance of getting America united again.

>That's so utterly ludicrous it's unreal. There is NO way anyone on this
>earth is going to save this country by uniting with democrats. They are
>corrupt to the core and downright anti-American.

>Goddamn you're stupid.

>The right has to WIN and the left has to be crushed. The idea that they
>would unite with us is utterly fucking insane. Do you live in a fucking
>cave?

>Goddamn you're stupid.

>You know what? I get it now. You think if the tea party is gone then
>democrats will be more reasonable. That's as fucking stupid as siting down
>with Iran for talks with no preconditions.

>Goddamn you're stupid.

>Let me tell you something, numbnuts. RINOs ain't gonna do it. They will NOT
>going save this country. They don't have the balls or even the understanding
>of how serious this is. The only entity that sees the writing on the wall
>and loves this country and the principles that it was founded on and wants
>to save them are tea partiers. The people you support are luke warm nothings
>that will preside over our demise only a bit more slowing that the left
>will.

>Goddamn you're stupid.

>-Eddie Haskell