Does the Democratic Party hate the rich? - alt.politics.democrats

The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
alt.politics.democrats
Message from discussion Does the Democratic Party hate the rich?
Path: pr3ni21717pbb.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Nickname unavailable <Vide...@tcq.net>
Newsgroups: alt.tv.oreilly-factor,rec.arts.tv,rec.arts.tv.news.oreilly-factor,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.economics
Subject: Re: Does the Democratic Party hate the rich?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 245
Message-ID: <407f85c5-35a0-4fe3-8b0b-1a48fcfbe647@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com>
References: <jp5bcj$jl6$1@dont-email.me> <cqttr.2015$0n.1640@unlimited.newshosting.com>
 <47c2392d-f9b8-45b4-a04c-b2c2fdd7df77@s9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>
 <5Gvtr.2$Qq6.0@unlimited.newshosting.com> <3b86a261-56bd-4f67-9c1f-d4d6f2ed6af9@m3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
 <wTrur.19545$nI1.17231@unlimited.newshosting.com> <20f41b3b-2ee1-419d-b5a5-712e4ff84c6c@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com>
 <0Suur.22813$CQ3.22214@unlimited.newshosting.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 96.2.124.53
Mime-Version: 1.0
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 18:03:40 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com; posting-host=96.2.124.53; posting-account=wHEl1AkAAACfbOqtf95QGhHCcsptonw8
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On May 21, 12:23=A0pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:20f41b3b-2ee1-419d-b5a5-712e4ff84c6c@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com...
> On May 21, 8:59 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:3b86a261-56bd-4f67-9c1f-d4d6f2ed6af9@m3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 18, 12:29 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> > >news:47c2392d-f9b8-45b4-a04c-b2c2fdd7df77@s9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com.=
..
> > > On May 18, 9:56 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:jp5bcj$jl6$1@dont-email.me...
>
> > > > > "Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch
> > > > > "The
> > > > > Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a b=
it
> > > > > too
> > > > > regular.
>
> > > > > Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn=
't
> > > > > have
> > > > > air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tun=
a.
> > > > > But
> > > > > never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the
> > > > > rich
> > > > > people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard =
any
> > > > > of
> > > > > that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That'=
s
> > > > > what
> > > > > I
> > > > > heard.
>
> > > > > But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have
> > > > > class
> > > > > envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the
> > > > > media
> > > > > is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are
> > > > > wealthy
> > > > > themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads
> > > > > running
> > > > > around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given th=
e
> > > > > chance
> > > > > some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to th=
e
> > > > > ground.
>
> > > > > A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U=
.S.
> > > > > benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent sa=
y
> > > > > "Yes",
> > > > > rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposi=
te.
> > > > > However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats
> > > > > believe
> > > > > wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
>
> > > > 46% of democrats are blithering dumbfucks who don't know who's
> > > > carrying
> > > > them
> > > > on their backs.
>
> > > > Time for a fucking Atlas Shrugs while we watch them starve to death=
 in
> > > > the
> > > > streets.
>
> > > > the wealthy parasites
>
> > > They carry your worthless smearing immoral character assassinating
> > > inhuman
> > > piece of shit ass. Did you become a democrat because you are an immor=
al
> > > fucking liar, or are you an immoral fucking liar and therefore a
> > > democrat?
>
> > > Oh, and while your playing in the sandbox lying and smearing for the
> > > fucking
> > > fun of it you might want to consider where you plan on living after y=
ou
> > > utterly fucking destroy the country just like you dumbfucks did with =
the
> > > financial crisis, only this time a hundred times worse.
>
> > > Or better yet do the world a favor just go fucking die.
>
> > > > cannot do without us. its a fact. in 2008 they
> > > > came to the little people begging us for a bailout:)))))))))))
>
> > > That's because you broke them making them do your bidding buying
> > > minority
> > > votes until you damned near destroyed the country, you bottom 50
> > > percenter
> > > low-life pile of lying SHIT.
>
> > > "Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and bundle the=
m
> > > into
> > > securities; that provides lenders the funds to lend more"
>
> > > "In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their
> > > purchases
> > > of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating un=
der
> > > that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and
> > > creative in stimulating minority gains."
>
> > > "The two companies are now required to devote 42% of their portfolios=
 to
> > > loans for low- and moderate-income borrowers"
>
> > > "Although Fannie Mae actually has exceeded its target since 1994, it =
is
> > > resisting any hike. It argues that a higher target would only produce
> > > more
> > > loan defaults by pressuring banks to accept unsafe borrowers."
>
> > >http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807
>
> > > "The Bush administration today recommended the most significant
> > > regulatory
> > > overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan
> > > crisis
> > > a
> > > decade ago."
>
> > > "Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new
> > > agency
> > > would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision=
 of
> > > Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that a=
re
> > > the
> > > two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."
>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/6lp5qu
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DM8LA8hPgQtI
>
> > >http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.=
..
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DLr1M1T2Y314
>
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3D_MGT_cSi7Rs
>
> > > "McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
>
> > > "Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae a=
nd
> > > Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN
> > > EVENTS
> > > learned from the letter shown in full text below."
>
> > >http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=3D28973
>
> > > Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than ear=
n
> > > the
> > > distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F
> > > contributions
> > > in
> > > the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
>
> > > Bill Clinton himself said it best:
>
> > > "I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in
> > > resisting
> > > any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was Presid=
ent
> > > to
> > > put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie
> > > Mac."
>
> > > -Bill Clinton
>
> > > ''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing =
any
> > > kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
> > > Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committ=
ee.
> > > ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there =
is
> > > on
> > > these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.=
''
> > > all of the rants and racism will still not erase the fact, that the
> > > private sector was bailed out by the wage earners. there is no atlas
> > > shrugged, because it never existed, nor will it ever exist. except in
> > > some stunted, immature, cult racked peanuts for brains types.
> > > the private sector and conservative tax cuts and wars imploded the
> > > economy period.
>
> > One thing about you niggers is that not only do you have low IQ's but l=
ow
> > morals as well. Die in Somalia where your nigger ass belongs, you godda=
mn
> > liar.
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
> > somalia is a conservative paradise. quite projecting.
>
> See what I mean about low morals, folks?
>
> > gee duh, whoda ever thunk:conservatism has been linked to low
> > i.q.'s:)))Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially
> > conservative ideologies
>
> More proof that you're an idiot.
>
> Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
>
> A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-a=
rt
> magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race
> differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
>
> The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ test=
s
> than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were
> developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the
> average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and
> for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
>
> http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
>
> -Eddie Haskell

 yet, you are a racist and a liar. so what.
Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
Account Options
