Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[O'Reilly Factor] Does the Democratic Party hate the rich?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
Ubiquitous
May 18, 2012, 5:20:42 AM5/18/12
to
"Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch "The
Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a bit too
regular.
Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn't have
air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tuna. But
never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich
people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard any of
that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That's what I
heard.
But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have class
envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the media
is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are wealthy
themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads running
around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given the chance
some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to the
ground.
A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
Now, I take that very personally because I, your humble correspondent,
against all odds have become a rich guy. And here is exactly what I do
for my country. I pay all my taxes. I have no offshore accounts and
everything the government wants my account in Swiftie is under orders to
pay.
My foundation named after my parents gives away millions of dollars to
the poor, to military families in need, and to fight disease worldwide. I
employ dozens of people, BillO'Reilly.com is my small business.
In addition, because "The Factor" is successful, people are hired by the
News Corporation to work on the program. Also, because I work very hard,
I employ people in my house and to do other things that I can't do.
Recently, I thought about retiring, but I added it up and more than 60
people would have lost their jobs had I packed it in. So now I hear that
almost half of the Democratic Party believe I provide no benefit at all
to America? Off the chart, dumb.
So I'll tell you what I'm going to do. I'm going to write a letter to
President Obama asking him to publicly acknowledge my contribution to the
USA. In his next press conference I want the President to open up with "I
just want you all to know what Bill O'Reilly is doing for the country."
Am I asking too much? Am I out of line here?
Bottom line, jealous pinheads hurt the country. I and others like me are
helping it.
And that's "The Memo."
--
"If Barack Obama isn't careful, he will become the Jimmy Carter of the
21st century."
Ruut66
May 18, 2012, 8:38:16 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 11:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> "Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch "The
> Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a bit too
> regular.
>
> Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn't have
> air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tuna. But
> never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich
> people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard any of
> that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That's what I
> heard.
>
> But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have class
> envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the media
> is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are wealthy
> themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads running
> around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given the chance
> some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to the
> ground.
>
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
Fiction never grew my nestegg. So why would anyone want to be part of
> "Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch "The
> Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a bit too
> regular.
>
> Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn't have
> air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tuna. But
> never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich
> people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard any of
> that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That's what I
> heard.
>
> But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have class
> envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the media
> is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are wealthy
> themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads running
> around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given the chance
> some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to the
> ground.
>
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
any rich-man fanclub if you're only well-off or plodding on? To
srew'em or not to screw'em. That's the "it's OK to be a snob"
question! Colonize the filthy rich before they colonize you!
R
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 10:08:15 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
them brown noses:))))))
could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
them brown noses:))))))
David Johnston
May 18, 2012, 10:54:10 AM5/18/12
to
On 5/18/2012 3:20 AM, Ubiquitous wrote:
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
Or they believe that the existence of a "class" of rich people is a bad
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
thing.
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 10:56:10 AM5/18/12
to
"Ubiquitous" <web...@polaris.net> wrote in message
news:jp5bcj$jl6$1...@dont-email.me...
>
> "Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch "The
> Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a bit too
> regular.
>
>
> Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn't have
> air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tuna. But
> never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich
> people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard any of
> that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That's what I
> heard.
>
> But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have class
> envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the media
> is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are wealthy
> themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads running
> around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given the chance
> some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to the
> ground.
>
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
46% of democrats are blithering dumbfucks who don't know who's carrying them
> "Talking Points" is a regular guy. I think most of you who watch "The
> Factor" often know that. Sometimes I've been accused of being a bit too
> regular.
>
>
> Growing up on Long Island my folks didn't have very much. We didn't have
> air conditioning, never bought a new car, ate spaghettios and tuna. But
> never once... never once did my parents show jealousy toward the rich
> people who lived in Garden City, a few miles away. I never heard any of
> that. I heard save your money and don't order an appetizer. That's what I
> heard.
>
> But America 50 years later is a far different place. Now we have class
> envy that is being stoked by the Democratic Party. Ironically the media
> is part of the anti-affluent jihad while many in the media are wealthy
> themselves. The same thing in Hollywood. You got these pinheads running
> around supporting the Occupy Wall Street protesters when given the chance
> some of those occupiers would burn their Hollywood mansions to the
> ground.
>
> A new Gallup poll asks a very simple question; do you think the U.S.
> benefits from having a class of rich people or not? 63 percent say "Yes",
> rich folks are ok. But 34 percent of Americans believe the opposite.
> However, when you break it down by party, 46 percent of Democrats believe
> wealthy Americans provide no benefit to the country whatsoever.
on their backs.
Time for a fucking Atlas Shrugs while we watch them starve to death in the
streets.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 10:58:09 AM5/18/12
to
"Ruut66" <ruu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:5c60521e-6f03-4269...@em1g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
Then we can all stand around wondering why we're all broke and living in
shit.
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 11:19:31 AM5/18/12
to
came to the little people begging us for a bailout:)))))))))))
"Two novels can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord
of
the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often
engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading
to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to
deal
with the real world. The other involves orcs."
Dear Klueless,
I am a self made man. i made my money the old fashioned way, i
inherited "IT" from my mom and dad. the "CHRISTIAN" hating atheist Ayn
Rand says that i have a
divine right to it. and if any of it is taken away from me, god will
strike you dead, and i will take my marbles away and go somewhere
else. never mind that i make my money in the markets where i refuse to
pay taxes, just ignore that, and let me keep my parasitical ways.
signed,
Laughing "AT YOU" all the way to the bank.
> -Eddie Haskell
just click on the link to see classic brown nose pandering at its
best.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/01/pandering-rich-now-handy-chart-form
Kevin Drum
Pandering to the Rich, Now in Handy Chart Form
—By Kevin Drum
| Thu Jan. 5, 2012 9:15 PM PST
As a public service, I've collected charts showing all the Republican
tax plans to date in one convenient place. (The Tax Policy Center
hasn't yet tried to score plans from Santorum, Huntsman, or Paul.)
It's really pretty spectacular seeing them all together like this.
It's not just the amount of pandering to the super-rich that's so
breathtaking, it's the lockstep unanimity. At all costs, every single
Republican candidate knows that he has to promise the ultra-wealthy a
huge tax break as the price of staying in the race. This, ladies and
gentlemen, is the modern Republican Party in a nutshell.
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 11:23:08 AM5/18/12
to
"Nickname unavailable" <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote in message
news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 11:28:16 AM5/18/12
to
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 11:35:32 AM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
"Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes Jr.
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They
find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little
revenue is spent in getting it. . . . It is not very unreasonable that
the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in
proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that
proportion." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations
"If the money is raised by taxation, then the burden will fall where
it ought to fall, . . . and the rich and stingy will no longer be able
to evade the duties of citizenship and of humanity." Robert Ingersoll
"I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and in . . . a
graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, . . . increasing rapidly in
amount with the size of the estate." Theodore Roosevelt
"the logical outcome of Rand's philosophy is a
fractured world, where the wealthy pay paramilitary forces to protect
them in their gated communities. It is a world not of some ideal,
free
market competition, but one in which the absence of regulations leads
to monopolization, the further concentration of wealth, and the
breakdown of consumer protections. And in that sort of world, the
production of wealth becomes more difficult, even for the wealthy. As
trite as the phrase has become, it does take a village. Individual
success and triumph often requires individual initiative and
perseverance, but it also depends upon so much else and so many other
people to create and maintain the foundations of a stable society.
Rand's lone individual is an illusion that must be challenged, not
only because it is a lie, but because it will never work, at least
not
in the long run."
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
"Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
Holmes Jr.
"The necessaries of life occasion the great expense of the poor. They
find it difficult to get food, and the greater part of their little
revenue is spent in getting it. . . . It is not very unreasonable that
the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in
proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that
proportion." Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations
"If the money is raised by taxation, then the burden will fall where
it ought to fall, . . . and the rich and stingy will no longer be able
to evade the duties of citizenship and of humanity." Robert Ingersoll
"I believe in a graduated income tax on big fortunes, and in . . . a
graduated inheritance tax on big fortunes, . . . increasing rapidly in
amount with the size of the estate." Theodore Roosevelt
"the logical outcome of Rand's philosophy is a
fractured world, where the wealthy pay paramilitary forces to protect
them in their gated communities. It is a world not of some ideal,
free
market competition, but one in which the absence of regulations leads
to monopolization, the further concentration of wealth, and the
breakdown of consumer protections. And in that sort of world, the
production of wealth becomes more difficult, even for the wealthy. As
trite as the phrase has become, it does take a village. Individual
success and triumph often requires individual initiative and
perseverance, but it also depends upon so much else and so many other
people to create and maintain the foundations of a stable society.
Rand's lone individual is an illusion that must be challenged, not
only because it is a lie, but because it will never work, at least
not
in the long run."
suzeeq
May 18, 2012, 12:24:00 PM5/18/12
to
Nickname unavailable wrote:
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
>>> race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
>>> them brown noses:))))))
>> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
>> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>
> aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious.
Do they shoot those birds too?
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>>
>> news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
>> On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>>
>>> could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
>>> race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
>>> them brown noses:))))))
>> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
>> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>>
>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>>
>> -Eddie Haskell
>
> aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious.
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 12:42:59 PM5/18/12
to
news:0719e841-631a-4ab1...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
-Eddie Haskell
On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > them brown noses:))))))
>
> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> Holmes Jr.
Then why don't you pay any, you rotten bottom 50 presenter piece of shit?
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > them brown noses:))))))
>
> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> Holmes Jr.
http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 12:40:14 PM5/18/12
to
Nickname unavailable
May 18, 2012, 12:49:03 PM5/18/12
to
On May 18, 11:42 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:0719e841-631a-4ab1...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > > them brown noses:))))))
>
> > What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> > that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
> > aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> > the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> > "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> > Holmes Jr.
>
> Then why don't you pay any, you rotten bottom 50 presenter piece of shit?
>
> http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
>
> -Eddie Haskell
i am a producer, i will have three new patents this year. i pay
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:0719e841-631a-4ab1...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > > them brown noses:))))))
>
> > What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> > that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
> > aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> > the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> > "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> > Holmes Jr.
>
> Then why don't you pay any, you rotten bottom 50 presenter piece of shit?
>
> http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
>
> -Eddie Haskell
taxes. in your case, you should get a job, become productive, or
borrow some money, start a business, become productive. you might find
life a tad bit different, once you are exposed to the real world.
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 1:20:38 PM5/18/12
to
news:8c4eccb5-30e0-46a6...@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com...
-Eddie Haskell
On May 18, 11:42 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:0719e841-631a-4ab1...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > > them brown noses:))))))
>
> > What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy,
> > and
> > that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
> > aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> > the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> > "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> > Holmes Jr.
>
> Then why don't you pay any, you rotten bottom 50 presenter piece of shit?
>
> http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> i am a producer, i will have three new patents this year.
They don't give patents on bullshit, you lying low-life bottom 50 percenter.
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> news:0719e841-631a-4ab1...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
> On May 18, 10:23 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> >news:b21e775c-a45e-485d...@e9g2000pbh.googlegroups.com...
> > On May 18, 4:20 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
>
> > > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > > them brown noses:))))))
>
> > What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy,
> > and
> > that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey fucker.
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=54jr3Ceu894
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
> > aristocracies always say to the pheasants they are envious. i am sure
> > the french aristocracy thought god would save them also.
> > "Taxes are what we pay for civilized society." Justice Oliver Wendell
> > Holmes Jr.
>
> Then why don't you pay any, you rotten bottom 50 presenter piece of shit?
>
> http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
>
> -Eddie Haskell
> i am a producer, i will have three new patents this year.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 1:29:39 PM5/18/12
to
news:47c2392d-f9b8-45b4...@s9g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
They carry your worthless smearing immoral character assassinating inhuman
piece of shit ass. Did you become a democrat because you are an immoral
fucking liar, or are you an immoral fucking liar and therefore a democrat?
Oh, and while your playing in the sandbox lying and smearing for the fucking
fun of it you might want to consider where you plan on living after you
utterly fucking destroy the country just like you dumbfucks did with the
financial crisis, only this time a hundred times worse.
Or better yet do the world a favor just go fucking die.
> cannot do without us. its a fact. in 2008 they
> came to the little people begging us for a bailout:)))))))))))
That's because you broke them making them do your bidding buying minority
votes until you damned near destroyed the country, you bottom 50 percenter
low-life pile of lying SHIT.
"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and bundle them into
securities; that provides lenders the funds to lend more"
"In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases
of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under
that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and
creative in stimulating minority gains."
"The two companies are now required to devote 42% of their portfolios to
loans for low- and moderate-income borrowers"
"Although Fannie Mae actually has exceeded its target since 1994, it is
resisting any hike. It argues that a higher target would only produce more
loan defaults by pressuring banks to accept unsafe borrowers."
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807
"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory
overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a
decade ago."
"Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency
would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the
two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."
http://tinyurl.com/6lp5qu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8LA8hPgQtI
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
"McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
"Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
learned from the letter shown in full text below."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973
Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
Bill Clinton himself said it best:
"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
-Bill Clinton
''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
piece of shit ass. Did you become a democrat because you are an immoral
fucking liar, or are you an immoral fucking liar and therefore a democrat?
Oh, and while your playing in the sandbox lying and smearing for the fucking
fun of it you might want to consider where you plan on living after you
utterly fucking destroy the country just like you dumbfucks did with the
financial crisis, only this time a hundred times worse.
Or better yet do the world a favor just go fucking die.
> cannot do without us. its a fact. in 2008 they
> came to the little people begging us for a bailout:)))))))))))
votes until you damned near destroyed the country, you bottom 50 percenter
low-life pile of lying SHIT.
"Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy mortgages from lenders and bundle them into
securities; that provides lenders the funds to lend more"
"In 1992, Congress mandated that Fannie and Freddie increase their purchases
of mortgages for low-income and medium-income borrowers. Operating under
that requirement, Fannie Mae, in particular, has been aggressive and
creative in stimulating minority gains."
"The two companies are now required to devote 42% of their portfolios to
loans for low- and moderate-income borrowers"
"Although Fannie Mae actually has exceeded its target since 1994, it is
resisting any hike. It argues that a higher target would only produce more
loan defaults by pressuring banks to accept unsafe borrowers."
http://articles.latimes.com/1999/may/31/news/mn-42807
"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant regulatory
overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a
decade ago."
"Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency
would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the
two largest players in the mortgage lending industry."
http://tinyurl.com/6lp5qu
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8LA8hPgQtI
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
"McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
"Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
learned from the letter shown in full text below."
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973
Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
Bill Clinton himself said it best:
"I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
-Bill Clinton
''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2012, 1:54:31 PM5/18/12
to
You could sit on the patent and NOT allow any use of the property
rights... And here is another question, why do you get "intellectual
property RIGHTS" but I can't get my *personal property rights*?
You can tax away my property rights, but can I tax away your
intellectual property? Can I say that we need the government to use
any portion of your patents for free? Or poor people can use your
intellectual property for free and sell the products until they hit a
million dollars in profit and then they have to pay royalties on all
sales over one million dollars.
These "intellectual RIGHTS" have been overlooked as a taxable property
for far too long.
You should be forced by taxation to either use your intellectual
property or to lose it to the IRS and it be sold to someone that will
use it.
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 2:04:15 PM5/18/12
to
"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:4FB68CD7...@blackhole.nebulax.com...
-Eddie Haskell
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2012, 2:10:54 PM5/18/12
to
with more Socialism....
--
*He has the most who is most content with the least* -Diogenes-
“The fact that we are here today to debate raising America 's debt limit
is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the US Government
cannot pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing
financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Government's
reckless fiscal policies. Increasing America 's debt weakens us
domestically and internationally. Leadership means that, "the buck stops
here.' Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today
onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt
problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.”
*Senator Barack H. Obama, March 2006*
Eddie Haskell
May 18, 2012, 2:36:25 PM5/18/12
to
"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:4FB690AE...@blackhole.nebulax.com...
over in 2013. Make 'em pay back the trillion dollars that they stole.
-Eddie Haskell
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2012, 7:34:44 PM5/18/12
to
> > could it be that you are a wealth worshiper perhaps:)))) the human
> > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > them brown noses:))))))
>
> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey
Down boy, down down.
> > race has always had those that pander to wealth and power. we call
> > them brown noses:))))))
>
> What we have today are people that pander to stupidity greed and envy, and
> that would be the DNC to you, you low IQ monkey
Bret Cahill
May 18, 2012, 7:34:05 PM5/18/12
to
after each other.
William December Starr
May 18, 2012, 7:57:41 PM5/18/12
to
No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
-- wds
-- wds
BeamMeUpScotty
May 18, 2012, 8:05:19 PM5/18/12
to
FRAUD for stealing and mishandling that trillion bucks.
Nickname unavailable
May 19, 2012, 12:48:02 AM5/19/12
to
have. however i do. i have multiples of them, i also own copyrights.
get a job, become productive. or borrow some money, start a business,
become productive.
Nickname unavailable
May 19, 2012, 12:51:05 AM5/19/12
to
On May 18, 12:29 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
> http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/09/update-fannie-mae-and-freddie...
private sector was bailed out by the wage earners. there is no atlas
shrugged, because it never existed, nor will it ever exist. except in
some stunted, immature, cult racked peanuts for brains types.
the private sector and conservative tax cuts and wars imploded the
economy period.
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
>
> "McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
>
> "Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
> Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
> learned from the letter shown in full text below."
>
> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973
>
> Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
> distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
> the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
>
> Bill Clinton himself said it best:
>
> "I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
> any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
> put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
>
> -Bill Clinton
>
> ''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
> kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
> Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
> ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
> these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
all of the rants and racism will still not erase the fact, that the
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs
>
> "McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
>
> "Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae and
> Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN EVENTS
> learned from the letter shown in full text below."
>
> http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=28973
>
> Unlike Bush and McCain, as senator, Obama did nothing, other than earn the
> distinction of becoming the second largest recipient of F&F contributions in
> the entire congress, even in his short stint there.
>
> Bill Clinton himself said it best:
>
> "I think the responsibility the Democrats have may rest more in resisting
> any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was President to
> put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac."
>
> -Bill Clinton
>
> ''These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing any
> kind of financial crisis,'' said Representative Barney Frank of
> Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services Committee.
> ''The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on
> these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing.''
private sector was bailed out by the wage earners. there is no atlas
shrugged, because it never existed, nor will it ever exist. except in
some stunted, immature, cult racked peanuts for brains types.
the private sector and conservative tax cuts and wars imploded the
economy period.
Nickname unavailable
May 19, 2012, 12:52:36 AM5/19/12
to
On May 18, 6:57 pm, wdst...@panix.com (William December Starr) wrote:
> No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
>
> -- wds
well said.
> No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
>
> -- wds
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 9:59:59 AM5/21/12
to
news:3b86a261-56bd-4f67...@m3g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
One thing about you niggers is that not only do you have low IQ's but low
morals as well. Die in Somalia where your nigger ass belongs, you goddamn
liar.
-Eddie Haskell
morals as well. Die in Somalia where your nigger ass belongs, you goddamn
liar.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 10:00:50 AM5/21/12
to
"William December Starr" <wds...@panix.com> wrote in message
news:jp6nll$8rh$1...@panix3.panix.com...
> No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
Now, fuck off.
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 12:24:44 PM5/21/12
to
On May 21, 9:00 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "William December Starr" <wdst...@panix.com> wrote in messagenews:jp6nll$8rh$1...@panix3.panix.com...
don't ya just love conservatives/stupid to the core/they will re-elect
the corporate stooge:hey wisconsin hows that walker thingy workin fer
ya hey:))))Rather than delivering the 10,000 new businesses/250,000
jobs/Walker is down 4,338 businesses/the state ranks dead last in job
creation
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-bottari/alec-in-wisconsin-the-hij_b_1531190.html
Mary Bottari
Center for Media and Democracy, ALECexposed.org and BanksterUSA.org
ALEC in Wisconsin: The Hijacking of a State
Posted: 05/20/2012 4:16 pm
Wisconsinites were shell shocked in 2011 by a wide-ranging legislative
agenda in their State Capitol that seemed to come out of the blue.
Anti-consumer bills, union busting legislation, voter ID, enormous tax
cuts for corporations and the wealthy along with requirements for
"super majority" votes to raise revenue were fast tracked through the
legislature.
The extreme agenda sparked massive protests regularly topping 100,000
and an 18-day Capitol occupation. In the middle of all this, mild
mannered UW Professor William Cronon posted a personal blog
speculating that the legislative onslaught may not be home grown, but
might have to do with a little known cadre of politicians and
corporations known as the American Legislative Exchange Council. The
Wisconsin GOP kicked up a media firestorm when it demanded all of
Cronon's emails in a fruitless attempt to prove that this highly
regarded historian was involved in partisan political activities.
A year later, Professor Cronin's thesis has been upheld by a new
report detailing the hijacking of Wisconsin by 49 ALEC members and
their corporate sponsors. This massive ALEC caucus (Wisconsin only has
132 legislators), which includes top leadership in both houses, has
worked with ALEC alum Scott Walker to transform the state in a manner
only an ALEC corporation could love.
Walker's Early ALEC Agenda
Before Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker ran for governor, he
was a state legislator from 1993-2002 and a proud member of American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). At ALEC, corporate and
legislative members gather behind closed doors to craft and pre-vote
on legislation that is later introduced in state houses across the
land with no disclosure of its ALEC roots.
In his first year in office, Walker cosponsored "Right to Work"
legislation (1993 SB 459) making it harder for public and private
sector unions to organize or exist. That bill failed to pass, but
Walker kept trying sponsoring "Paycheck Protection" legislation (1997
AB 624), which would make it tough for unions to spend money on
elections. He also worked hard to pass "Truth in Sentencing" (1997 AB
351), which would greatly increase the number of inmates in prison at
the same time that he attempted to privatize Wisconsin's prison system
(1997 AB 634, 1999 AB 176 and AB 519), He also co-sponsored a bill
(1997 AB 745) which would have prohibited all state agencies,
including higher education, from providing goods and services that
could be procured from the private sector, with rare exceptions.
All these measures reflect long-standing ALEC bills and priorities.
This week, a new report from the Center for Media and Democracy shows
that Walker is still one of ALEC's most able and effective
politicians. In the 2011-2012 session, the Wisconsin legislature
passed at least 32 bills reflecting 41 ALEC provisions, the vast
majority of which were signed into law by Governor Walker. No doubt
the ALEC team trophy is in the mail.
Going for Broke, Walker's ALEC Agenda Today
After his election in 2010, Governor Walker delivered a one-two punch
only ALEC would love. His first proposal was an "omnibus" tort bill
that draws on numerous ALEC templates to make it much harder for
Wisconsin families to hold corporations accountable when dangerous
products injure or kill their loved ones.
When asked by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel if Walker was drawing
from the ALEC playbook, Walker's press secretary Cullen Werwie replied
"absolutely not." But as the bill was pending in the legislature, ALEC
sent an email to Wisconsin members stating ALEC "supports this
legislation which includes numerous provisions that reflect ALEC's
civil justice reform policy and model legislation." The bill benefits
Big Pharma and other ALEC firms. After Act 2 became law, ALEC issued a
release applauding team Walker for their "immediate attention to
reforming the state's legal system." Walker promoted the bill as
needed to entice new businesses to the state; he promised 10,000 new
businesses and 250,000 jobs while on the campaign trail.
On Feb. 11, 2011, Walker sent shock waves through the state by
introducing a "Budget Repair Bill," which effectively eliminates
collective bargaining for state workers -- making way for a race to
the bottom in wages and benefits for some 380,000 workers. A key
aspect of Act 10 Act, which prohibits the state from collecting union
dues, reflects ALEC's Public Employer Payroll Deduction Policy Act.
Another key aspect, which does not allow unions to re-certify unless
they get the majority of 100 percent of their members to vote, was
just approved as an ALEC "model bill" at their May 2012 meeting in
Charlotte.
While consumers and working families were most injured by these bills,
it did not escape notice that unions and trial lawyers -- who
traditionally support Democrats -- were also harmed. In introducing
the budget repair bill, Walker said the state was "broke" and he had
no other option. In public, he stuck to these talking points with
admirable discipline, but he told a different story when talking to
his top campaign contributor.
How to Become a Red State? Divide and Conquer
In sworn testimony before Congress in April 2011, Gov. Walker said his
controversial measure was not political and that he had no intention
of going after the donor base of the Democratic Party. He specifically
denied ever having a conversation along those lines. A video recently
released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel provides evidence to the
contrary.
The video catches Walker talking to a campaign contributor in January
2011, before he introduced the union-busting bill. Billionaire Diane
Hendricks greets Walker with enthusiasm and asks two critical
questions: how he was going to make Wisconsin a "red state" and if he
would be implementing "Right to Work" legislation. Walker replies that
the "first step" would be "to divide and conquer" the unions through a
budget bill dealing with public sector workers. He also discusses
legislation to limit corporate liability.
This frank talk to a woman who would later hand his recall campaign
committee as single check for $500,000, puts the Walker agenda in a
new light.
So How is the ALEC Economy Working for You?
Walker's efforts to dismantle unions and kneecap trial lawyers are
completely in synch with the ALEC agenda. CMD's published over 800
ALEC model bills last year and the ALECexposed.org archive reveals
that ALEC has dozens of bills to dismantle unions and to protect
companies that produce dangerous and deadly products. No other issue
area, except perhaps school privatization, contains such a raft of
bills.
But what has the Walker/ALEC agenda gotten Wisconsin residents? Rather
than delivering the 10,000 new businesses and 250,000 jobs, Walker is
down 4,338 businesses from when he took office and the state ranks
dead last in job creation according to the most recent Bureau of Labor
Statistics data.
The only real winners have been the global corporations that back ALEC
and its radical agenda. Walker has received $406,553 dollars in recent
years in campaign contributions from ALEC member corporations, and
millions more funneled though 3rd party groups by the Koch brothers
and Koch Industries, which funds ALEC and sits on the governing board
of ALEC. David Koch's Americans for Prosperity, is spending
undisclosed millions on TV and is reportedly tasking some 70 staff to
the Walker recall election on June 5.
These corporations will fight tooth and nail to prevent the recall of
their single best investment.
> "William December Starr" <wdst...@panix.com> wrote in messagenews:jp6nll$8rh$1...@panix3.panix.com...
>
> > No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
>
> Not only do you hate the rich, but you lie like hell as well.
>
> Now, fuck off.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
everyone knows conservatives hate real capitalism.
> > No, it doesn't. Got any more stupid questions?
>
> Not only do you hate the rich, but you lie like hell as well.
>
> Now, fuck off.
>
> -Eddie Haskell
don't ya just love conservatives/stupid to the core/they will re-elect
the corporate stooge:hey wisconsin hows that walker thingy workin fer
ya hey:))))Rather than delivering the 10,000 new businesses/250,000
jobs/Walker is down 4,338 businesses/the state ranks dead last in job
creation
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mary-bottari/alec-in-wisconsin-the-hij_b_1531190.html
Mary Bottari
Center for Media and Democracy, ALECexposed.org and BanksterUSA.org
ALEC in Wisconsin: The Hijacking of a State
Posted: 05/20/2012 4:16 pm
Wisconsinites were shell shocked in 2011 by a wide-ranging legislative
agenda in their State Capitol that seemed to come out of the blue.
Anti-consumer bills, union busting legislation, voter ID, enormous tax
cuts for corporations and the wealthy along with requirements for
"super majority" votes to raise revenue were fast tracked through the
legislature.
The extreme agenda sparked massive protests regularly topping 100,000
and an 18-day Capitol occupation. In the middle of all this, mild
mannered UW Professor William Cronon posted a personal blog
speculating that the legislative onslaught may not be home grown, but
might have to do with a little known cadre of politicians and
corporations known as the American Legislative Exchange Council. The
Wisconsin GOP kicked up a media firestorm when it demanded all of
Cronon's emails in a fruitless attempt to prove that this highly
regarded historian was involved in partisan political activities.
A year later, Professor Cronin's thesis has been upheld by a new
report detailing the hijacking of Wisconsin by 49 ALEC members and
their corporate sponsors. This massive ALEC caucus (Wisconsin only has
132 legislators), which includes top leadership in both houses, has
worked with ALEC alum Scott Walker to transform the state in a manner
only an ALEC corporation could love.
Walker's Early ALEC Agenda
Before Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker ran for governor, he
was a state legislator from 1993-2002 and a proud member of American
Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). At ALEC, corporate and
legislative members gather behind closed doors to craft and pre-vote
on legislation that is later introduced in state houses across the
land with no disclosure of its ALEC roots.
In his first year in office, Walker cosponsored "Right to Work"
legislation (1993 SB 459) making it harder for public and private
sector unions to organize or exist. That bill failed to pass, but
Walker kept trying sponsoring "Paycheck Protection" legislation (1997
AB 624), which would make it tough for unions to spend money on
elections. He also worked hard to pass "Truth in Sentencing" (1997 AB
351), which would greatly increase the number of inmates in prison at
the same time that he attempted to privatize Wisconsin's prison system
(1997 AB 634, 1999 AB 176 and AB 519), He also co-sponsored a bill
(1997 AB 745) which would have prohibited all state agencies,
including higher education, from providing goods and services that
could be procured from the private sector, with rare exceptions.
All these measures reflect long-standing ALEC bills and priorities.
This week, a new report from the Center for Media and Democracy shows
that Walker is still one of ALEC's most able and effective
politicians. In the 2011-2012 session, the Wisconsin legislature
passed at least 32 bills reflecting 41 ALEC provisions, the vast
majority of which were signed into law by Governor Walker. No doubt
the ALEC team trophy is in the mail.
Going for Broke, Walker's ALEC Agenda Today
After his election in 2010, Governor Walker delivered a one-two punch
only ALEC would love. His first proposal was an "omnibus" tort bill
that draws on numerous ALEC templates to make it much harder for
Wisconsin families to hold corporations accountable when dangerous
products injure or kill their loved ones.
When asked by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel if Walker was drawing
from the ALEC playbook, Walker's press secretary Cullen Werwie replied
"absolutely not." But as the bill was pending in the legislature, ALEC
sent an email to Wisconsin members stating ALEC "supports this
legislation which includes numerous provisions that reflect ALEC's
civil justice reform policy and model legislation." The bill benefits
Big Pharma and other ALEC firms. After Act 2 became law, ALEC issued a
release applauding team Walker for their "immediate attention to
reforming the state's legal system." Walker promoted the bill as
needed to entice new businesses to the state; he promised 10,000 new
businesses and 250,000 jobs while on the campaign trail.
On Feb. 11, 2011, Walker sent shock waves through the state by
introducing a "Budget Repair Bill," which effectively eliminates
collective bargaining for state workers -- making way for a race to
the bottom in wages and benefits for some 380,000 workers. A key
aspect of Act 10 Act, which prohibits the state from collecting union
dues, reflects ALEC's Public Employer Payroll Deduction Policy Act.
Another key aspect, which does not allow unions to re-certify unless
they get the majority of 100 percent of their members to vote, was
just approved as an ALEC "model bill" at their May 2012 meeting in
Charlotte.
While consumers and working families were most injured by these bills,
it did not escape notice that unions and trial lawyers -- who
traditionally support Democrats -- were also harmed. In introducing
the budget repair bill, Walker said the state was "broke" and he had
no other option. In public, he stuck to these talking points with
admirable discipline, but he told a different story when talking to
his top campaign contributor.
How to Become a Red State? Divide and Conquer
In sworn testimony before Congress in April 2011, Gov. Walker said his
controversial measure was not political and that he had no intention
of going after the donor base of the Democratic Party. He specifically
denied ever having a conversation along those lines. A video recently
released by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel provides evidence to the
contrary.
The video catches Walker talking to a campaign contributor in January
2011, before he introduced the union-busting bill. Billionaire Diane
Hendricks greets Walker with enthusiasm and asks two critical
questions: how he was going to make Wisconsin a "red state" and if he
would be implementing "Right to Work" legislation. Walker replies that
the "first step" would be "to divide and conquer" the unions through a
budget bill dealing with public sector workers. He also discusses
legislation to limit corporate liability.
This frank talk to a woman who would later hand his recall campaign
committee as single check for $500,000, puts the Walker agenda in a
new light.
So How is the ALEC Economy Working for You?
Walker's efforts to dismantle unions and kneecap trial lawyers are
completely in synch with the ALEC agenda. CMD's published over 800
ALEC model bills last year and the ALECexposed.org archive reveals
that ALEC has dozens of bills to dismantle unions and to protect
companies that produce dangerous and deadly products. No other issue
area, except perhaps school privatization, contains such a raft of
bills.
But what has the Walker/ALEC agenda gotten Wisconsin residents? Rather
than delivering the 10,000 new businesses and 250,000 jobs, Walker is
down 4,338 businesses from when he took office and the state ranks
dead last in job creation according to the most recent Bureau of Labor
Statistics data.
The only real winners have been the global corporations that back ALEC
and its radical agenda. Walker has received $406,553 dollars in recent
years in campaign contributions from ALEC member corporations, and
millions more funneled though 3rd party groups by the Koch brothers
and Koch Industries, which funds ALEC and sits on the governing board
of ALEC. David Koch's Americans for Prosperity, is spending
undisclosed millions on TV and is reportedly tasking some 70 staff to
the Walker recall election on June 5.
These corporations will fight tooth and nail to prevent the recall of
their single best investment.
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 12:22:29 PM5/21/12
to
gee duh, whoda ever thunk:conservatism has been linked to low
i.q.'s:)))Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially
conservative ideologies the study found:Those ideologies in turn
stress hierarchy/resistance to change attitudes that can contribute to
prejudice
and you have proven these articles correct:))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Low IQ & Conservative Beliefs Linked to Prejudice
By Stephanie Pappas | LiveScience.com – 3 hrs ago
• 20 photos - Wed, Jan 25, 2012
See latest photos »
There's no gentle way to put it: People who give in to racism and
prejudice may simply be dumb, according to a new study that is bound
to stir public controversy.
The research finds that children with low intelligence are more likely
to hold prejudiced attitudes as adults. These findings point to a
vicious cycle, according to lead researcher Gordon Hodson, a
psychologist at Brock University in Ontario. Low-intelligence adults
tend to gravitate toward socially conservative ideologies, the study
found. Those ideologies, in turn, stress hierarchy and resistance to
change, attitudes that can contribute to prejudice, Hodson wrote in an
email to LiveScience.
"Prejudice is extremely complex and multifaceted, making it critical
that any factors contributing to bias are uncovered and understood,"
he said.
Controversy ahead
The findings combine three hot-button topics.
"They've pulled off the trifecta of controversial topics," said Brian
Nosek, a social and cognitive psychologist at the University of
Virginia who was not involved in the study. "When one selects
intelligence, political ideology and racism and looks at any of the
relationships between those three variables, it's bound to upset
somebody."
Polling data and social and political science research do show that
prejudice is more common in those who hold right-wing ideals that
those of other political persuasions, Nosek told LiveScience. [7
Thoughts That Are Bad For You]
"The unique contribution here is trying to make some progress on the
most challenging aspect of this," Nosek said, referring to the new
study. "It's not that a relationship like that exists, but why it
exists."
Brains and bias
Earlier studies have found links between low levels of education and
higher levels of prejudice, Hodson said, so studying intelligence
seemed a logical next step. The researchers turned to two studies of
citizens in the United Kingdom, one that has followed babies since
their births in March 1958, and another that did the same for babies
born in April 1970. The children in the studies had their intelligence
assessed at age 10 or 11; as adults ages 30 or 33, their levels of
social conservatism and racism were measured. [Life's Extremes:
Democrat vs. Republican]
In the first study, verbal and nonverbal intelligence was measured
using tests that asked people to find similarities and differences
between words, shapes and symbols. The second study measured cognitive
abilities in four ways, including number recall, shape-drawing tasks,
defining words and identifying patterns and similarities among words.
Average IQ is set at 100.
Social conservatives were defined as people who agreed with a laundry
list of statements such as "Family life suffers if mum is working full-
time," and "Schools should teach children to obey authority."
Attitudes toward other races were captured by measuring agreement with
statements such as "I wouldn't mind working with people from other
races." (These questions measured overt prejudiced attitudes, but most
people, no matter how egalitarian, do hold unconscious racial biases;
Hodson's work can't speak to this "underground" racism.)
As suspected, low intelligence in childhood corresponded with racism
in adulthood. But the factor that explained the relationship between
these two variables was political: When researchers included social
conservatism in the analysis, those ideologies accounted for much of
the link between brains and bias.
People with lower cognitive abilities also had less contact with
people of other races.
"This finding is consistent with recent research demonstrating that
intergroup contact is mentally challenging and cognitively draining,
and consistent with findings that contact reduces prejudice," said
Hodson, who along with his colleagues published these results online
Jan. 5 in the journal Psychological Science.
A study of averages
Hodson was quick to note that the despite the link found between low
intelligence and social conservatism, the researchers aren't implying
that all liberals are brilliant and all conservatives stupid. The
research is a study of averages over large groups, he said.
"There are multiple examples of very bright conservatives and not-so-
bright liberals, and many examples of very principled conservatives
and very intolerant liberals," Hodson said.
Nosek gave another example to illustrate the dangers of taking the
findings too literally.
"We can say definitively men are taller than women on average," he
said. "But you can't say if you take a random man and you take a
random woman that the man is going to be taller. There's plenty of
overlap."
Nonetheless, there is reason to believe that strict right-wing
ideology might appeal to those who have trouble grasping the
complexity of the world.
"Socially conservative ideologies tend to offer structure and order,"
Hodson said, explaining why these beliefs might draw those with low
intelligence. "Unfortunately, many of these features can also
contribute to prejudice."
In another study, this one in the United States, Hodson and Busseri
compared 254 people with the same amount of education but different
levels of ability in abstract reasoning. They found that what applies
to racism may also apply to homophobia. People who were poorer at
abstract reasoning were more likely to exhibit prejudice against gays.
As in the U.K. citizens, a lack of contact with gays and more
acceptance of right-wing authoritarianism explained the link. [5 Myths
About Gay People Debunked]
Simple viewpoints
Hodson and Busseri's explanation of their findings is reasonable,
Nosek said, but it is correlational. That means the researchers didn't
conclusively prove that the low intelligence caused the later
prejudice. To do that, you'd have to somehow randomly assign otherwise
identical people to be smart or dumb, liberal or conservative. Those
sorts of studies obviously aren't possible.
The researchers controlled for factors such as education and
socioeconomic status, making their case stronger, Nosek said. But
there are other possible explanations that fit the data. For example,
Nosek said, a study of left-wing liberals with stereotypically naïve
views like "every kid is a genius in his or her own way," might find
that people who hold these attitudes are also less bright. In other
words, it might not be a particular ideology that is linked to
stupidity, but extremist views in general.
"My speculation is that it's not as simple as their model presents
it," Nosek said. "I think that lower cognitive capacity can lead to
multiple simple ways to represent the world, and one of those can be
embodied in a right-wing ideology where 'People I don't know are
threats' and 'The world is a dangerous place'. ... Another simple way
would be to just assume everybody is wonderful."
Prejudice is of particular interest because understanding the roots of
racism and bias could help eliminate them, Hodson said. For example,
he said, many anti-prejudice programs encourage participants to see
things from another group's point of view. That mental exercise may be
too taxing for people of low IQ.
"There may be cognitive limits in the ability to take the perspective
of others, particularly foreigners," Hodson said. "Much of the present
research literature suggests that our prejudices are primarily
emotional in origin rather than cognitive. These two pieces of
information suggest that it might be particularly fruitful for
researchers to consider strategies to change feelings toward
outgroups," rather than thoughts.
You can follow LiveScience senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter
@sipappas. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and
discoveries on Twitter @livescience and on Facebook.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
its so easy to fool a conservative:after all, conservatism is a form
of mental illness:)a 2007 selective exposure study found Republicans
overwhelmingly chose to read fake articles labeled with the Fox News
logo:but chose a story running under a CNN or NPR logo just 10
percent of the time
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-mooney/want-to-understand-republ_...
Chris Mooney Author, 'The Republican War on Science' and 'The
Republican Brain'
Want to Understand Republicans? First Understand Evolution Posted:
02/ 8/2012 10:26 am
Earlier this week, yesterday's Republican primary champ Rick Santorum
called global warming a "hoax." Yes, a hoax. In other words,
apparently scientists are in a global cabal to needlessly alarm us
about what's happening with the climate -- and why would they do such
a thing? Well, presumably to help advance an economy-choking agenda
of global governance -- or perhaps, to line their own pockets with
government research grants. Seriously. Santorum's absurd global
warming conspiracy theory is the kind of thing that absolutely
outrages liberals -- but to my mind, they really ought to be getting
used to it by now. From global warming denial to claims about "death
panels" to baseless fears about inflation, it often seems there are
so many factually wrong claims on the political right that those who
make them live in a different reality. So here's an idea: Maybe they
actually do. And maybe we can look to science itself -- albeit,
ironically, a body of science whose fundamental premise (the theory
of evolution) most Republicans deny -- to help understand why it is
that they view the world so differently. In my last piece here, I
commented on the growing body of research suggesting that the
difference between liberals and conservatives is not merely
ideological in nature. Rather, it seems more deeply rooted in
psychology and the brain -- with ideology itself emerging as a kind
of by-product of fundamentally different patterns of perceiving and
responding to the world that spill over into many aspects of life,
not just the political. To back this up, I listed seven published
studies showing a consistent set of physiological, brain, and
"attentional" differences between liberals and conservatives. Later
on my blog, I listed no less than eleven studies showing genetic
differences as well. Last month, yet another scientific paper on this
subject came out -- from the National Science Foundation-supported
political physiology laboratory at the University of Nebraska-
Lincoln. The work, published in Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society B (free version here), goes further still in helping us
understand how biological and physiological differences between
liberals and conservatives may lead to very different patterns of
political behavior. As the new research suggests, conservatism is
largely a defensive ideology -- and therefore, much more appealing to
people who go through life sensitive and highly attuned to aversive
or threatening aspects of their environments. By contrast, liberalism
can be thought of as an exploratory ideology -- much more appealing
to people who go through life trying things out and seeking the new.
All of this is reflected, in a measurable way, in the physiological
responses that liberals and conservatives show to emotionally
evocative but otherwise entirely apolitical images -- and also to
images of politicians, either on their own side or from across the
aisle. To show as much, the Nebraska-Lincoln researchers had liberals
and conservatives look at varying combinations of images that were
meant to excite different emotions. There were images that caused
fear and disgust -- a spider crawling on a person's face, maggots in
an open wound -- but also images that made you feel happy: a smiling
child, a bunny rabbit. The researchers also mixed in images of
liberal and conservative politicians -- Bill and Hillary Clinton,
Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. While they did all of this, the
scientists measured the subjects' "skin conductance" -- the
moistening of their sweat glands, an indication of sympathetic
nervous system arousal -- as well as where their eyes went first and
how long they stayed there. The difference was striking:
Conservatives showed much stronger skin responses to negative images,
compared with the positive ones. Liberals showed the opposite. And
when the scientists turned to studying eye gaze or "attentional"
patterns, they found that conservatives looked much more quickly at
negative or threatening images, and spent more time fixating on them.
Liberals, in contrast, were less quickly drawn to negative images --
and spent more time looking at positive ones. Similar things have
been found before -- but the big breakthrough in the new study was
showing that these tendencies carried over perfectly to the different
sides' responses to images of politicians. Conservatives had stronger
rapid fire physiological responses to images of Bill and Hillary
Clinton -- apparently perceiving them much as they perceive a threat.
By contrast, liberals showed stronger responses to the same two
politicians, apparently perceiving them much as they perceive an
appetitive or positive stimulus. As the authors concluded, "The
aversive in life is more physiologically and cognitively tangible to
some people and they tend to gravitate to the political right." What
does this mean? To my mind, it means it is high time to grapple with
a fact that we like to conveniently ignore: the left and the right
are deeply asymmetrical actors in our politics. If we could
acknowledge this, it might explain an awful lot. For instance,
consider a few observations that seem to take on new resonance in
light of the latest research: The Tea Party hates President Obama
much more intensely than liberals love him. Or to state things less
judgmentally, there is an "intensity gap," as the Pew Research Center
puts it, between the right's political base and that of the left. As
of last May, for instance, 84 percent of staunch conservatives
strongly disapproved of Obama's job performance, but only 64 percent
of solid liberals approved of it. Meanwhile, 70 percent of staunch
conservatives viewed Obama very unfavorably, but only 45 percent of
solid liberals had very favorable views of him. What's going on here?
To conservatives, the new research implies, President Obama may
literally be an aversive and threatening stimuli (or, perhaps, a
disgust-evoking one). They fixate on him, and respond to him,
physiologically, in a defensive fashion. For liberals, in contrast,
Obama was surely once very appealing, perhaps circa 2008, and excited
positive and appetitive emotions. But they've since grown bored or
disillusioned with him and gone on to sample many other things in the
environment -- like Occupy Wall Street -- always exploring and
searching for the new. (All of which, incidentally, may translate
into a very serious electoral disadvantage this fall.) Conservatives
opt for Fox News much more strongly than liberals opt for any single
outlet. In a 2007 "selective exposure" study by Stanford researcher
Shanto Iyengar, it was found Republicans overwhelmingly chose to read
fake articles labeled with the "Fox News" logo, but chose a story
running under a CNN or NPR logo just 10 percent of the time. By
contrast, Democrats in the study didn't like Fox, but also didn't
show a strong affinity for a particular alternative news source --
they seemed to sample information sources more widely. What's going
on here? One possibility is that in a political environment filled
with perceived threats, Fox helps conservatives feel secure by giving
them ideologically consistent and reassuring information.
Alternatively, perhaps Fox's constant negative framing of liberals,
and of other news sources, appeals to or even excites conservatives,
whipping them up for political battle. Either way, liberals just
don't seem to need an outlet like Fox. Again, they're busy chasing
after the new and different -- out exploring, rather than hunkering
down. The big question lying behind all this, of course, is why some
people would have stronger and quicker responses than others to that
which is perceived as negative and threatening (and disgusting). Or
alternatively, why some people -- liberals -- would be less threat
aversive than others. For as the University of Nebraska-Lincoln
researchers note: "given the compelling evolutionary logic for
organisms to be overly sensitive to aversive stimuli, it may be that
those on the political left are more out of step with adaptive
behaviors." And thus are we drawn to the only context in which we can
make any sense of any of this -- the understanding that we human
primates evolved. As such, these rapid-fire responses to aversive
stimuli are something we share with other animals -- a core part of
our life- saving biological wiring. And apparently, they differ in
strength and intensity from person to person -- in turn triggering
political differences in modern democracies. Who knew? For now, I'll
leave it to others to speculate on the root causes of these
differences. But whatever those may be, the perceptual gap between
left and right certainly seems less than "adaptive" at the present
moment. It may be the fault of biology that we're now misfiring so
very badly -- clashing in ways that, as with the debt ceiling fiasco,
could have gravely harmed everybody in America, regardless of their
particular ideology. The Nebraska-Lincoln scientists interpret their
results as a powerful argument in favor of greater political
tolerance and understanding -- and I agree with them. Politics isn't
war, and it isn't zero sum. It requires negotiation and compromise.
Surely our public debates should be guided by something more than
threat responses and fight-or-flight. So how do we get beyond our
political biology? Well, the implication for liberals seems obvious:
If they want to fare better politically, they need to learn to go
against their instincts and stay focused and committed. And the
lesson for conservatives? Well, here it is tougher. You see, first
we'd have to get them to accept something they often view as aversive
and threatening: The theory of evolution.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
it is based on empirical fact:the journal Psychological Science which
revealed that people with conservative beliefs are likely to be of
low
intelligence:Conservatism Thrives on Low Intelligence/Poor
Information:the effects of the Conservative appeal to stupidity are
making themselves felt
http://www.alternet.org/story/154082/Conservatism_Thrives_on_Low_Inte...
Conservatism Thrives on Low Intelligence and Poor Information There
is plenty of research showing that low general intelligence in
childhood predicts greater prejudice towards people of different
ethnicity or sexuality in adulthood. February 12, 2012 |
Self-deprecating, too liberal for their own good, today's
progressives stand back and watch, hands over their mouths, as the
social vivisectionists of the right slice up a living society to see
if its component parts can survive in isolation. Tied up in knots of
reticence and self-doubt, they will not shout stop. Doing so requires
an act of interruption, of presumption, for which they no longer
possess a vocabulary. Perhaps it is in the same spirit of liberal
constipation that, with the exception of Charlie Brooker, we have
been too polite to mention the Canadian study published last month in
the journal Psychological Science, which revealed that people with
conservative beliefs are likely to be of low intelligence.
Paradoxically it was the Daily Mail that brought it to the attention
of British readers last week. It feels crude, illiberal to point out
that the other side is, on average, more stupid than our own. But
this, the study suggests, is not unfounded generalisation but
empirical fact. It is by no means the first such paper. There is
plenty of research showing that low general intelligence in childhood
predicts greater prejudice towards people of different ethnicity or
sexuality in adulthood. Open-mindedness, flexibility, trust in other
people: all these require certain cognitive abilities. Understanding
and accepting others – particularly "different" others – requires an
enhanced capacity for abstract thinking. But, drawing on a sample
size of several thousand, correcting for both education and
socioeconomic status, the new study looks embarrassingly robust.
Importantly, it shows that prejudice tends not to arise directly from
low intelligence but from the conservative ideologies to which people
of low intelligence are drawn. Conservative ideology is the "critical
pathway" from low intelligence to racism. Those with low cognitive
abilities are attracted to "rightwing ideologies that promote
coherence and order" and "emphasise the maintenance of the status
quo". Even for someone not yet renowned for liberal reticence, this
feels hard to write. This is not to suggest that all conservatives
are stupid. There are some very clever people in government, advising
politicians, running thinktanks and writing for newspapers, who have
acquired power and influence by promoting rightwing ideologies. But
what we now see among their parties – however intelligent their
guiding spirits may be – is the abandonment of any pretence of high-
minded conservatism. On both sides of the Atlantic, conservative
strategists have discovered that there is no pool so shallow that
several million people won't drown in it. Whether they are promoting
the idea that Barack Obama was not born in the US, that man-made
climate change is an eco-fascist-communist-anarchist conspiracy, or
that the deficit results from the greed of the poor, they now appeal
to the basest, stupidest impulses, and find that it does them no harm
in the polls. Don't take my word for it. Listen to what two former
Republican ideologues, David Frum and Mike Lofgren, have been saying.
Frum warns that "conservatives have built a whole alternative
knowledge system, with its own facts, its own history, its own laws
of economics". The result is a "shift to ever more extreme, ever more
fantasy-based ideology" which has "ominous real-world consequences
for American society". Lofgren complains that "the crackpot outliers
of two decades ago have become the vital centre today". The
Republican party, with its "prevailing anti-intellectualism and
hostility to science" is appealing to what he calls the "low-
information voter", or the "misinformation voter". While most office
holders probably don't believe the "reactionary and paranoid
claptrap" they peddle, "they cynically feed the worst instincts of
their fearful and angry low- information political base". The
madness hasn't gone as far in the UK, but the effects of the
Conservative appeal to stupidity are making themselves felt. This
week the Guardian reported that recipients of disability benefits,
scapegoated by the government as scroungers, blamed for the
deficit, now find themselves subject to a new level of hostility and
threats from other people. These are the perfect conditions for a
billionaires' feeding frenzy. Any party elected by misinformed,
suggestible voters becomes a vehicle for undisclosed interests. A tax
break for the 1% is dressed up as freedom for the 99%. The regulation
that prevents big banks and corporations exploiting us becomes an
assault on the working man and woman. Those of us who discuss man-
made climate change are cast as elitists by people who happily
embrace the claims of Lord Monckton, Lord Lawson or thinktanks funded
by ExxonMobil or the Koch brothers: now the authentic voices of the
working class. But when I survey this wreckage I wonder who the real
idiots are. Confronted with mass discontent, the once-progressive
major parties, as Thomas Frank laments in his latest book Pity the
Billionaire, triangulate and accommodate, hesitate and prevaricate,
muzzled by what he calls "terminal niceness". They fail to produce a
coherent analysis of what has gone wrong and why, or to make an
uncluttered case for social justice, redistribution and regulation.
The conceptual stupidities of conservatism are matched by the
strategic stupidities of liberalism. Yes, conservatism thrives on
low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics
on both sides of the Atlantic continue to back off, yielding to the
supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i am shocked:not only has conservatism been tied to low I.Q./low
functioning individuals/but also research shows that low-effort
thought promotes political conservatism:political viewpoints of
patrons with high blood alcohol levels were more likely to be
conservative
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/07/conservative-politics-low-effort-thinking_n_1410448.html?ref=mostpopular
Conservative Politics, 'Low-Effort' Thinking Linked In New Study
The Huffington Post | By David Freeman
Posted: 04/ 9/2012 10:44 am Updated: 04/ 9/2012 2:16 pm
Conservatives and liberals don't seem to agree about much, and they
might not agree about recent studies linking conservatism to low
intelligence and "low-effort" thinking.
As The Huffington Post reported in February, a study published in the
journal "Psychological Science" showed that children who score low on
intelligence tests gravitate toward socially conservative political
views in adulthood--perhaps because conservative ideologies stress
"structure and order" that make it easier to understand a complicated
world.
Ouch.
And now there's the new study linking conservative ideologies to "low-
effort" thinking.
"People endorse conservative ideology more when they have to give a
first or fast response," the study's lead author, University of
Arkansas psychologist Dr. Scott Eidelman, said in a written statement
released by the university.
Does the finding suggest that conservatives are lazy thinkers?
"Not quite," Dr. Eidelman told The Huffington Post in an email. "Our
research shows that low-effort thought promotes political
conservatism, not that political conservatives use low-effort
thinking."
For the study, a team of psychologists led by Dr. Eidelman asked
people about their political viewpoints in a bar and in a laboratory
setting.
Bar patrons were asked about social issues before blowing into a
Breathalyzer. As it turned out, the political viewpoints of patrons
with high blood alcohol levels were more likely to be conservative
than were those of patrons whose blood alcohol levels were low.
But it wasn't just the alcohol talking, according to the statement.
When the researchers conducted similar interviews in the lab, they
found that people who were asked to evaluate political ideas quickly
or while distracted were more likely to express conservative
viewpoints.
"Keeping people from thinking too much...or just asking them to
deliberate or consider information in a cursory manner can impact
people's political attitudes, and in a way that consistently promotes
political conservatism," Dr. Eidelman said in the email.
The study was published online in the journal "Personality and Social
Psychology Bulletin."
What do you think? Are conservatives less intelligent than liberals--
or more intelligent? And is conservatism a matter of lazy thinking?
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 1:23:08 PM5/21/12
to
news:20f41b3b-2ee1-419d...@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com...
See what I mean about low morals, folks?
> gee duh, whoda ever thunk:conservatism has been linked to low
> i.q.'s:)))Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially
> conservative ideologies
More proof that you're an idiot.
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race
differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests
than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were
developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the
average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and
for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
-Eddie Haskell
> gee duh, whoda ever thunk:conservatism has been linked to low
> i.q.'s:)))Low-intelligence adults tend to gravitate toward socially
> conservative ideologies
Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art
magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race
differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests
than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were
developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the
average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and
for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 1:24:25 PM5/21/12
to
news:20f41b3b-2ee1-419d...@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyvqhdllXgU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBrHkxqNT7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI
-Eddie Haskell
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBrHkxqNT7s
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P36x8rTb3jI
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 2:03:39 PM5/21/12
to
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 2:04:41 PM5/21/12
to
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 3:22:23 PM5/21/12
to
news:407f85c5-35a0-4fe3...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
Truth sucks for you, boy.
-Eddie Haskell
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 3:25:28 PM5/21/12
to
news:b31471a4-d377-4690...@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com...
"Typical white person"
-Hussein
"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself."
-Hussein
Hussein's associations:
Rev. Wright, whose church Hussein attended and supported financially for
over
20 years:
"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."
Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Hussein to deliver the inaugural benediction:
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."
Sonia Sotomayor, Hussein's pick for the SC:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."
From Hussein's book:
"White man's greed runs a world in need."
Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.
Obama advisor Van Jones:
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
"Coates, who said he was testifying before the commission as a whistle
blower and in violation of his Justice supervisor's instructions, said that
there is a "hostile atmosphere" in the civil rights division that did not
"reflect race neutral policies." He said the country's major civil rights
organizations are also biased against race-neutral enforcement."
http://tinyurl.com/3x5ts8o
"In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over
the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther
Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil
rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white
victims. "
http://tinyurl.com/3x8q42h
-Eddie Haskell
-Hussein
"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself."
-Hussein
Hussein's associations:
Rev. Wright, whose church Hussein attended and supported financially for
over
20 years:
"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."
Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Hussein to deliver the inaugural benediction:
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."
Sonia Sotomayor, Hussein's pick for the SC:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."
From Hussein's book:
"White man's greed runs a world in need."
Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.
Obama advisor Van Jones:
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
"Coates, who said he was testifying before the commission as a whistle
blower and in violation of his Justice supervisor's instructions, said that
there is a "hostile atmosphere" in the civil rights division that did not
"reflect race neutral policies." He said the country's major civil rights
organizations are also biased against race-neutral enforcement."
http://tinyurl.com/3x5ts8o
"In emotional and personal testimony, an ex-Justice official who quit over
the handling of a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther
Party accused his former employer of instructing attorneys in the civil
rights division to ignore cases that involve black defendants and white
victims. "
http://tinyurl.com/3x8q42h
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 21, 2012, 3:26:27 PM5/21/12
to
news:b31471a4-d377-4690...@t2g2000pbl.googlegroups.com...
-Eddie Haskell
Obama advisor Van Jones:
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
http://www.resist.com/CARTOON%20GALLERY/NIGGERS/nig_image28.jpg
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
-Eddie Haskell
Rockinghorse Winner
May 21, 2012, 7:36:18 PM5/21/12
to
* It may have been the liquor talking, but
Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
I dunno - I used to live in a Democratic neighborhood - the people there
didn't look at all like the studious type....
OTOH, the conservative neighborhood I live in now has million dollar
mansions and lots of doctors, lawyers, police, firemen and business people.
IOW, college material. Go figure.
Terry
--
"For I would ride with you upon the wind, |/
Run on the top of the dishevelled tide, |/ Gentoo Linux
And dance upon the mountains like a flame." |/
-Yeats |/
Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
didn't look at all like the studious type....
OTOH, the conservative neighborhood I live in now has million dollar
mansions and lots of doctors, lawyers, police, firemen and business people.
IOW, college material. Go figure.
Terry
--
"For I would ride with you upon the wind, |/
Run on the top of the dishevelled tide, |/ Gentoo Linux
And dance upon the mountains like a flame." |/
-Yeats |/
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 11:43:05 PM5/21/12
to
lying, and racism.
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 11:44:39 PM5/21/12
to
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 11:45:56 PM5/21/12
to
On May 21, 6:36 pm, Rockinghorse Winner <badass.super...@gmx.com>
wrote:
nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
will vote liberal.
wrote:
will vote liberal.
Nickname unavailable
May 21, 2012, 11:43:56 PM5/21/12
to
On May 21, 2:25 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
ROTFLOLO!!!!!!!!! this coming from someone who has called me the "N"
word repeatedly in many threads.
ROTFLOLO!!!!!!!!! this coming from someone who has called me the "N"
word repeatedly in many threads.
Rockinghorse Winner
May 22, 2012, 12:37:03 AM5/22/12
to
* It may have been the liquor talking, but
Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
[snip]
>
>
> nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
> will vote liberal.
>
conservative.
Clave
May 22, 2012, 3:16:57 AM5/22/12
to
"Rockinghorse Winner" <badass....@gmx.com> wrote in message
news:slrnjrm5vg.cpi....@badass.edu...
news:slrnjrm5vg.cpi....@badass.edu...
> * It may have been the liquor talking, but
> Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>>
>> nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
>> will vote liberal.
>>
>
> ...and - the more poor and ignorant you are. The rest of us vote
> conservative.
And you actually believe that.
> Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>
>>
>> nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
>> will vote liberal.
>>
>
> ...and - the more poor and ignorant you are. The rest of us vote
> conservative.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 11:09:30 AM5/22/12
to
news:2f209cb4-4aba-47d7...@pr3g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
Don't question science, you backward bone-nosed bushman.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 11:19:40 AM5/22/12
to
news:f0cc8cca-2645-4d80...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
You don't know the difference between an education and an indoctrination
because of your low IQ.
because of your low IQ.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 11:11:56 AM5/22/12
to
news:79fce53d-d354-4b72...@k10g2000pbk.googlegroups.com...
On May 21, 2:25 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> ROTFLOLO!!!!!!!!! this coming from someone who has called me the "N"
> word repeatedly in many threads.
Yeah, what about it?
> ROTFLOLO!!!!!!!!! this coming from someone who has called me the "N"
> word repeatedly in many threads.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 11:14:00 AM5/22/12
to
news:791bef71-9f83-4a90...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
I win again.
"Typical white person"
-Hussein
"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself."
-Hussein
Hussein's associations:
Rev. Wright, whose church Hussein attended and supported financially for
over
20 years:
"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."
Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Hussein to deliver the inaugural benediction:
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."
Sonia Sotomayor, Hussein's pick for the SC:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."
From Hussein's book:
"White man's greed runs a world in need."
Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.
"Typical white person"
-Hussein
"Judge me by the people with whom I surround myself."
-Hussein
Hussein's associations:
Rev. Wright, whose church Hussein attended and supported financially for
over
20 years:
"Barack knows what it means living in a country and a culture that is
controlled by rich white people."
Rev. Lowery, hand picked by Hussein to deliver the inaugural benediction:
"Lord, in the memory of all the saints who from their labors rest, and in
the joy of a new beginning, we ask you to help us work for that day when
black will not be asked to get in back, when brown can stick around, when
yellow will be mellow, when the red man can get ahead, man; and when white
will embrace what is right."
Sonia Sotomayor, Hussein's pick for the SC:
"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences
would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who
hasn't lived that life."
From Hussein's book:
"White man's greed runs a world in need."
Prof. Gates, anti-white racist who Obama says is a friend of his.
Obama advisor Van Jones:
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
"Only Suburban White Kids Shoot Up Schools"
"You've never seen a Columbine done by a black child"
"White polluters steered poison into minority communities"
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 11:15:40 AM5/22/12
to
news:slrnjrlkbk.7p0....@badass.edu...
Yeah, same with my posh, high end gated community. Being a democrat here is
against the covenants.
-Eddie Haskell
against the covenants.
-Eddie Haskell
Rockinghorse Winner
May 22, 2012, 12:55:59 PM5/22/12
to
* It may have been the liquor talking, but
that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
and American history.
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 1:02:14 PM5/22/12
to
On May 21, 11:37 pm, Rockinghorse Winner <badass.super...@gmx.com>
wrote:
bunkers, and homer simpsons.
wrote:
> * It may have been the liquor talking, but
>
>
> Nickname unavailable <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
> > nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
> > will vote liberal.
>
> ...and - the more poor and ignorant you are. The rest of us vote
> conservative.
>
the conservative movement is running low on al bundys, archie
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
> > nothing to figure. the more educated you are, the more likely you
> > will vote liberal.
>
> ...and - the more poor and ignorant you are. The rest of us vote
> conservative.
>
bunkers, and homer simpsons.
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 1:04:44 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 10:09 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
>
> Don't question science, you backward bone-nosed bushman.
>
> Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
>
> A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art
> magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race
> differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
>
> The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests
> than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were
> developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the
> average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and
> for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
>
> http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
>
> -Eddie Haskell
yea, solid science by ward connely types. geesh, we are in the middle
>
> Don't question science, you backward bone-nosed bushman.
>
> Race differences in average IQ are largely genetic
>
> A 60-page review of the scientific evidence, some based on state-of-the-art
> magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of brain size, has concluded that race
> differences in average IQ are largely genetic.
>
> The Worldwide Pattern of IQ Scores. East Asians average higher on IQ tests
> than Whites, both in the U. S. and in Asia, even though IQ tests were
> developed for use in the Euro-American culture. Around the world, the
> average IQ for East Asians centers around 106; for Whites, about 100; and
> for Blacks about 85 in the U.S. and 70 in sub-Saharan Africa.
>
> http://www.news-medical.net/news/2005/04/26/9530.aspx
>
> -Eddie Haskell
of a race war. black on white violence is approaching epidemic
proportions. just ask bill o'liely.
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 1:05:29 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 10:11 am, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
didn't you know. we are in a race war.
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 1:10:48 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 11:55 am, Rockinghorse Winner <badass.super...@gmx.com>
wrote:
> > Yeah, same with my posh, high end gated community. Being a democrat here is
> > against the covenants.
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo), but
> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
> and American history.
>
but even if you can read, that does not mean you have the
capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
and provide for the general welfare.
the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
wrote:
> > Yeah, same with my posh, high end gated community. Being a democrat here is
> > against the covenants.
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo), but
> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
> and American history.
>
capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
and provide for the general welfare.
the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
Rockinghorse Winner
May 22, 2012, 1:28:23 PM5/22/12
to
>> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo), but
>> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
>> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
>> and American history.
Evidence "A":
>> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
>> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
>> and American history.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 2:08:00 PM5/22/12
to
news:060a77a8-4600-4597...@pa10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
That's what happens when the apes escape the zoo.
-Eddie Haskell
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 2:08:49 PM5/22/12
to
news:aa1e06d0-6db9-4477...@f9g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...
Good. I'll grab my AR 15.
-Eddie Haskell
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 2:11:07 PM5/22/12
to
news:slrnjrnh94.i5i....@badass.edu...
Educated? Oh, you mean like in academia where no one pays a price for being
full of shit like a conservative in the private sector.
-Eddie Haskell
full of shit like a conservative in the private sector.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 2:18:01 PM5/22/12
to
news:88cb5812-39dd-4f97...@st3g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
many time does this have to be explained to you? Oh, that's right, you're a
Negro democrat so the truth means absolutely nothing to you seeing as you've
dedicated your life to lying cheating and stealing.
"Classical liberalism is the philosophy committed to the ideal of limited
government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of
individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free
markets."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
> document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
It limits the power of the federal government no matter how badly you want
to be a ward of the state, kunta kinte.
> legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
> and provide for the general welfare.
> the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
> conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
> history.
And the meaning of the words has reversed since then, so yes, they hated
you.
-Eddie Haskell
On May 22, 11:55 am, Rockinghorse Winner <badass.super...@gmx.com>
wrote:
> > Yeah, same with my posh, high end gated community. Being a democrat here
> > is
> > against the covenants.
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo),
> but
> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As
> far
> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the
> constitution,
> and American history.
>
> but even if you can read, that does not mean you have the
> capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
> crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
That's because liberalism in the founder's day is conservatism today. How
wrote:
> > Yeah, same with my posh, high end gated community. Being a democrat here
> > is
> > against the covenants.
>
> > -Eddie Haskell
>
> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo),
> but
> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As
> far
> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the
> constitution,
> and American history.
>
> but even if you can read, that does not mean you have the
> capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
> crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
many time does this have to be explained to you? Oh, that's right, you're a
Negro democrat so the truth means absolutely nothing to you seeing as you've
dedicated your life to lying cheating and stealing.
"Classical liberalism is the philosophy committed to the ideal of limited
government, constitutionalism, rule of law, due process, and liberty of
individuals including freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and free
markets."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
> document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
to be a ward of the state, kunta kinte.
> legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
> and provide for the general welfare.
> the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
> conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
> history.
you.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 2:18:52 PM5/22/12
to
news:slrnjrnj5s.j3d....@badass.edu...
-Eddie Haskell
>* It may have been the liquor talking, but
> Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
>>> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo),
>>> but
>>> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate.
>>> As far
>>> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the
>>> constitution,
>>> and American history.
>
> Evidence "A":
>
>> but even if you can read, that does not mean you have the
>> capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
>> crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
>> document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
>> legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
>> and provide for the general welfare.
>> the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
>> conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
>> history.
>
> Terry
Give 'em enough rope.
> Nickname unavailable <Vid...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
>>> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo),
>>> but
>>> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate.
>>> As far
>>> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the
>>> constitution,
>>> and American history.
>
> Evidence "A":
>
>> but even if you can read, that does not mean you have the
>> capabilities to comprehend what the constitution really is. it was
>> crafted by liberals, who despised conservatism. it is a liberal
>> document, that gives broad powers to the federal government to
>> legislate, regulate, tax, mandate, negate state laws, and to promote
>> and provide for the general welfare.
>> the majority of the founders despised conservatism, and they blamed
>> conservatives for almost losing the war. so you know little about real
>> history.
>
> Terry
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 3:30:12 PM5/22/12
to
waged by conservative paranoid race baiting distorting cranks. oops, i
guess you already know that, you are one of them:))))
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 3:27:56 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 12:28 pm, Rockinghorse Winner <badass.super...@gmx.com>
wrote:
wrote:
> * It may have been the liquor talking, but
>
>
> Nickname unavailable <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote:
> >> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo), but
> >> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
> >> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
> >> and American history.
>
> Evidence "A":
>
yet you cannot refute, typical.
> >> I wasn't implying that _I_ live in one of the mansions (I own a condo), but
> >> that liberalism attracts both the highly educated _and_ the illiterate. As far
> >> as I know, you still have to be able to read to appreciate the constitution,
> >> and American history.
>
> Evidence "A":
>
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 3:31:53 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 1:18 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
liar, conservatives hate mandates, legislation, regulation, taxes,
negating of state rights, and promoting and providing for the general
welfare. you are not even a good liar.
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
negating of state rights, and promoting and providing for the general
welfare. you are not even a good liar.
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 3:49:19 PM5/22/12
to
news:ac7bca25-bb45-4dd4...@o3g2000pby.googlegroups.com...
I'm dialing in the chordates to your shotgun shack on my mortar launcher.
Kiss your ass goodbye, coon boy.
-Eddie Haskell
Kiss your ass goodbye, coon boy.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 3:52:26 PM5/22/12
to
news:c2656d12-9de4-4dad...@n8g2000pbv.googlegroups.com...
Rather than whining for a nanny state to take your freedom and take care of
you because you possess a slave mentality, why not try getting a job and
running your own life like a white man?
That freedom stuff too hard, you being inferior and all?
-Eddie Haskell
you because you possess a slave mentality, why not try getting a job and
running your own life like a white man?
That freedom stuff too hard, you being inferior and all?
-Eddie Haskell
Nickname unavailable
May 22, 2012, 3:28:34 PM5/22/12
to
On May 22, 1:08 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
yep, racist to your core, a conservative value.
> "Nickname unavailable" <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote in message
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2012, 5:24:44 PM5/22/12
to
news:07964d73-5c19-45eb...@ri8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
While you make good on yours when you step into the voting, so all bets are
off. Oh, and I noticed how black America has Zimmerman tried and convicted.
That's because racism is a Negro value as much as it is a democrat one. But
not to worry, maybe some lib will carry you with affirmative action, you
being inferior and all.
off. Oh, and I noticed how black America has Zimmerman tried and convicted.
That's because racism is a Negro value as much as it is a democrat one. But
not to worry, maybe some lib will carry you with affirmative action, you
being inferior and all.
Nickname unavailable
May 23, 2012, 12:14:07 AM5/23/12
to
context, and plain old lying and racism. everyone knows conservatives
are racists, even conservatives know it. i have had conservatives in
this thread and others, call me the "N" WORD.
Eddie Haskell
May 24, 2012, 5:02:49 PM5/24/12
to
news:13fb1bd1-42ee-4671...@h10g2000pbi.googlegroups.com...
Who give's a fiddler's damn? You voted in and support a racist for president
so you can piss and moan until all the fried chicken is gone and you have to
get back to shining DNC shoes, boy.
so you can piss and moan until all the fried chicken is gone and you have to
get back to shining DNC shoes, boy.
Nickname unavailable
May 24, 2012, 5:13:05 PM5/24/12
to
they blame others for what is on their own minds.
Nickname unavailable
May 24, 2012, 5:10:42 PM5/24/12
to
you can always tell what is on the mind of "THE CONSERVATIVE", is
when they blame others for what is on their own minds.
> -Eddie Haskell
when they blame others for what is on their own minds.
Eddie Haskell
May 24, 2012, 5:24:25 PM5/24/12
to
news:43764d3f-828f-4954...@oo8g2000pbc.googlegroups.com...
When you finish projecting you can stop by and wash my car. And if you're
wearing that Louis Farrakhan tee shirt again I'm going to grab my whip and
tan your ass good.
wearing that Louis Farrakhan tee shirt again I'm going to grab my whip and
tan your ass good.
Nickname unavailable
May 25, 2012, 10:13:41 AM5/25/12
to
On May 24, 4:24 pm, "Eddie Haskell" <rghr...@sasas.com> wrote:
lets put this to rest once and for all. the democrats do not hate the
rich. conservatives love racists and fascists. its well documented,
and the real truth is coming out daily.
prominent republican conservative running against a democrat was
endorsed by nazi's:it seems that conservatives have much in common
with nazi's:conservatives helped hitler get into power and worked for
him:conservatives in america marched in the streets for nazis
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/24/jesse-kelly-endorsement_n_1544054.html
Lucia Graves
lu...@huffingtonpost.com
Jesse Kelly, Arizona Congressional Candidate, Stonewalls Press Over
Controversial Endorsement
Posted: 05/24/2012 6:26 pm Updated: 05/24/2012 6:45 pm
GOP congressional candidate Jesse Kelly still won't say why he
accepted the endorsement of a controversial anti-illegal immigration
group known as Americans for Legal Immigration PAC in 2010.
Earlier this week when KGUN9 News anchor Jennifer Waddell asked about
the endorsement during an interview, Kelly's spokesman, John
Ellinwood, interrupted the studio session in a fury. "I have to stop
you; that is false," said Ellinwood, who was sitting just offstage.
"He did not accept it recently; that [endorsement] was from 2010."
Though Kelly allowed Waddell to repeat her question, he seemed to
agree with Ellinwood's assessment. "Frankly it's completely out of
bounds," he said about the query.
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC or ALIPAC is "supported" by a
designated hate group and "allied with various Minuteman factions,"
according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Anti-Defamation
League has also pointed out ALIPAC's support from white supremacists
and anti-Semites.
But when asked by KGUN9 about ALIPAC once again, on Wednesday night,
Kelly continued to deflect the question, retreating repeatedly to
unrelated talking points on energy matters.
When contacted for comment by The Huffington Post, ALIPAC president
and spokesman William Gheen said KGUN9 News had the story wrong.
“Basically some liberals down at KGUN9 are trying to insert Neo-Natzis
and the Jewish Holocaust into the congressional race where it doesn’t
belong,” he said. “We’re a multiracial group that has condemned racist
groups … and we’ve asked for an apology in writing.”
Kelly is running against Democrat Ron Barber for a seat that opened up
after Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords's resignation. Barber is a
former Giffords aide.
Watch Kelly dodge questions on Wednesday about his ALIPAC endorsement.
lets put this to rest once and for all. the democrats do not hate the
rich. conservatives love racists and fascists. its well documented,
and the real truth is coming out daily.
prominent republican conservative running against a democrat was
endorsed by nazi's:it seems that conservatives have much in common
with nazi's:conservatives helped hitler get into power and worked for
him:conservatives in america marched in the streets for nazis
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/24/jesse-kelly-endorsement_n_1544054.html
Lucia Graves
lu...@huffingtonpost.com
Jesse Kelly, Arizona Congressional Candidate, Stonewalls Press Over
Controversial Endorsement
Posted: 05/24/2012 6:26 pm Updated: 05/24/2012 6:45 pm
GOP congressional candidate Jesse Kelly still won't say why he
accepted the endorsement of a controversial anti-illegal immigration
group known as Americans for Legal Immigration PAC in 2010.
Earlier this week when KGUN9 News anchor Jennifer Waddell asked about
the endorsement during an interview, Kelly's spokesman, John
Ellinwood, interrupted the studio session in a fury. "I have to stop
you; that is false," said Ellinwood, who was sitting just offstage.
"He did not accept it recently; that [endorsement] was from 2010."
Though Kelly allowed Waddell to repeat her question, he seemed to
agree with Ellinwood's assessment. "Frankly it's completely out of
bounds," he said about the query.
Americans for Legal Immigration PAC or ALIPAC is "supported" by a
designated hate group and "allied with various Minuteman factions,"
according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The Anti-Defamation
League has also pointed out ALIPAC's support from white supremacists
and anti-Semites.
But when asked by KGUN9 about ALIPAC once again, on Wednesday night,
Kelly continued to deflect the question, retreating repeatedly to
unrelated talking points on energy matters.
When contacted for comment by The Huffington Post, ALIPAC president
and spokesman William Gheen said KGUN9 News had the story wrong.
“Basically some liberals down at KGUN9 are trying to insert Neo-Natzis
and the Jewish Holocaust into the congressional race where it doesn’t
belong,” he said. “We’re a multiracial group that has condemned racist
groups … and we’ve asked for an apology in writing.”
Kelly is running against Democrat Ron Barber for a seat that opened up
after Democratic Rep. Gabrielle Giffords's resignation. Barber is a
former Giffords aide.
Watch Kelly dodge questions on Wednesday about his ALIPAC endorsement.
Dano
May 25, 2012, 12:34:43 PM5/25/12
to
"Nickname unavailable" wrote in message
news:91d33760-ea45-4ffe...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
lets put this to rest once and for all. the democrats do not hate the
rich. conservatives love racists and fascists. its well documented,
and the real truth is coming out daily.
prominent republican conservative running against a democrat was
endorsed by nazi's:it seems that conservatives have much in common
with nazi's:conservatives helped hitler get into power and worked for
him:conservatives in america marched in the streets for nazis
=================================================
I think it's pretty obvious that the "rich" are the ones who hate the rest
of us. They wall themselves up in gated communities...stay segregated from
the rest of society as much as possible. Who has the exclusive country
clubs and other "clubs" that you must attain great wealth...and even THEN
the "old money" folks often are unaccepting of those who join their ranks
late? And as a group (yes...there certainly ARE exceptions) they keep a
death grip on their wealth and try to limit "membership" in their group as
much as possible. It's about "winning".
I'm not saying that ALL rich folks are uncaring and unwilling to pay their
fair share and contribute fully to society in general. But far more than
they, as a group would like to admit.
news:91d33760-ea45-4ffe...@l5g2000pbo.googlegroups.com...
lets put this to rest once and for all. the democrats do not hate the
rich. conservatives love racists and fascists. its well documented,
and the real truth is coming out daily.
prominent republican conservative running against a democrat was
endorsed by nazi's:it seems that conservatives have much in common
with nazi's:conservatives helped hitler get into power and worked for
him:conservatives in america marched in the streets for nazis
I think it's pretty obvious that the "rich" are the ones who hate the rest
of us. They wall themselves up in gated communities...stay segregated from
the rest of society as much as possible. Who has the exclusive country
clubs and other "clubs" that you must attain great wealth...and even THEN
the "old money" folks often are unaccepting of those who join their ranks
late? And as a group (yes...there certainly ARE exceptions) they keep a
death grip on their wealth and try to limit "membership" in their group as
much as possible. It's about "winning".
I'm not saying that ALL rich folks are uncaring and unwilling to pay their
fair share and contribute fully to society in general. But far more than
they, as a group would like to admit.
Nickname unavailable
May 25, 2012, 12:53:56 PM5/25/12
to
wealth is one group. traitors to their class such as the roosevelts
were another.
0 new messages