Re: 3D Guns?...it's all over now

[Transition Zone]

On May 17, 1:42 pm, Ed Huntress <huntre...@optonline.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 10:37:06 -0500, RD Sandman
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <rdsandman[remove]@comcast.net> wrote:
> >Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote in
> >news:jadcp818pd5sa0dh4...@4ax.com:
>
> >> On Thu, 16 May 2013 17:13:22 -0600, deep wrote:
>
> >>>On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:48:34 -0400, "Scout"
> >>><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>"deep" wrote in message
> >>>>news:ignap89v99ulf1jmn...@4ax.com...
> >>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:26:26 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>>> <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> There you go again.
>
> >>>>>>Yea, pointing out the facts and showing how you haven't supported
> >>>>>>your claims.
>
> >>>>>>> You ask for an example of anti government right wing groups, are
> >>>>>>> given such examples and then attempt to blur the issue by talking
> >>>>>>> about being against ANY government.
>
> >>>>>>They are not against ANY government then they are not
> >>>>>>anti-government.
>
> >>>>> There you go again, you are such a pathetic lying idiot.  Of course
> >>>>> anti government right wing groups clearly applies to groups that
> >>>>> are against the CURRENT government you ass.
>
> >>>>Ah, so you were anti-government and will be again.
>
> >>>Yes and no... Republicans won't come to power again.
>
> >>>>After all you were against the government under GW Bush, and I'm sure
> >>>>you will be opposed to any government under any other GOP President.
>
> >>>Won't happen.  Too many people know why lying trash you are.
>
> >>>>So basically everyone has, is and will be anti-government at some
> >>>>point in time.
>
> >>>They're talking about current events you idiot.
>
> >>>>Yea, I can see how that's a real critical issue that needs to be
> >>>>address.... <snicker>
>
> >>>Who's anti government now?  Hard-line right wing militias and lone
> >>>wolf anarchists.
>
> >>>Now anarchists... that's someone who's anti government no matter what.
> >>>But that's not what they are talking about now when they say
> >>>"anti-government".
>
> >> Anarchists are, in fact, the only ones who are "anti-government." But
> >> the left loves to redefine words. Now, anyone who is
> >> "anti-Obama-administration" is labeled as "anti-government."
>
> >Or racist.
>
> Often, actually racist. Thinly disguised; shrilly denied; but lurking
> just under the surface. And sometimes it comes up and breaks water.
>
> Beyond that, there is much to the "anti-government" accusation, as
> well. Many people on the right don't consider it to be an accusation.
> They consider it a compliment.
>
> When Grover Norquist's famous line is quoted ("I'm not in favor of
> abolishing the government. I just want to shrink it down to the
size
>where we can drown it in the bathtub."), the cheering and clapping are
> infectious.

Its great that Norquist has lost so much influence. (he's now
barely just a tea party blip on the screen)

[RD Sandman]

Transition Zone <mog...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:48af6789-cfd1-4ff9...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:

Anyone who follows just one person has a fool wearing his shirt.

--
Sleep well, tonight.....

RD (The Sandman

You can be young without money, but you
can't be old without it.

[Notuf Questions]

On May 19, 9:49 am, GOP_Decline_and_Fall <D...@null.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 06:06:08 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:49:19 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
> ><D...@null.net> wrote:
>
> >>On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:36:12 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> >><klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:33:29 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
> >>><D...@null.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>On Sun, 19 May 2013 05:13:07 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> >>>><klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>On Sat, 18 May 2013 11:39:29 -0700, GOP_Decline_and_Fall
> >>>>><D...@null.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>On Sat, 18 May 2013 18:02:13 +0000 (UTC), Gray Guest
> >>>>>><No_email_for_...@wahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>GOP_Decline_and_Fall <D...@null.net> wrote in
> >>>>>>>news:b4sdp8hn45u2gaqfl...@4ax.com:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 17 May 2013 08:00:40 -0700, Klaus Schadenfreude
> >>>>>>>><klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>On Fri, 17 May 2013 07:48:28 -0700 (PDT), Mighty Wannabe
> >>>>>>>>><mightwann...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>On 17 May, 09:54, Klaus Schadenfreude <klausschadenfre...@yahoo.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>wrote:

> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:33:40 -0600, deep wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> >On Thu, 16 May 2013 18:26:26 -0400, "Scout"
> >>>>>>>>>>> ><me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> There you go again.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>Yea, pointing out the facts and showing how you haven't supported
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>your claims.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> You ask for an example of anti government right wing groups, are
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> given such examples and then attempt to blur the issue by talking
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>> about being against ANY government.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>They are not against ANY government then they are not
> >>>>>>>>>>> >>anti-government.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> >There you go again, you are such a pathetic lying idiot.  Of course
> >>>>>>>>>>> >anti government right wing groups clearly applies to groups that are
> >>>>>>>>>>> >against the CURRENT government you ass.
>

> >>>>>>>>>>> Wrong. Again.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> That would be "anti-administration." The left chooses to use
> >>>>>>>>>>> "anti-government" as a fear tactic. As usual, it's totally inaccurate
> >>>>>>>>>>> and that's why they like it.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>I think the word you were looking for is "anarchist". Yes,
> >>>>>>>>>>"anarchist"; The GOP rightards are anarchists.
>
> >>>>>>>>>You think that because you're ignorant. You don't know what the word
> >>>>>>>>>means.
>
> >>>>>>>>>ANARCHY
> >>>>>>>>>a : absence of government
> >>>>>>>>>b : a state of lawlessness or political disorder due to the absence of
> >>>>>>>>>governmental authority
> >>>>>>>>>c : a utopian society of individuals who enjoy complete freedom
> >>>>>>>>>without government
>
> >>>>>>>> Anarcho-fascism (also used interchangeably with the terms libertarian
> >>>>>>>> fascism, fascist anarchy, corporatist libertarianism and stateless
> >>>>>>>> fascism) is a radical, right-wing, anti-statist political and economic
> >>>>>>>> ideology.
>
> >>>>>>>Anarchy and facism can't be linked becuase they are polar opposites. You
> >>>>>>>really aren't to bright, are you?
>
> >>>>>>You never fail to showcase your ignorance.
>
> >>>>>>Feel free to educate yourself or not.
> >>>>>>I am betting not.
>
> >>>>>>Anarcho-fascism: the libertarian endgame
>
> >>>>>>http://www.dailykos.com
>
> >>>>>ROFLMAO
>
> >>>>>The Daily Kos?
>
> >>>>>"POINT PROVEN!"
> >>>>>Lee Harrison 1957-2012, RIP
>
> >>>>Your obsession with Kos [..]
>
> >>>I have no obsession with Kos. Do you even know the meaning of the
> >>>word?
>
> >>>I'm just laughing at them for putting two words together that are
> >>>mutually EXCLUSIVE.
>
> >>>The fact that YOU are attempting to use the word shows just how
> >>>fucking stupid, desperate, and ignorant you really are.
>
> >>>Keep up the fine work!
>
> >>>LOL
>
> >>>P.S. What *is* it with you leftists and your inability to know the
> >>>meanings of words?
>
> >>Putting to one side your pathetic knee-jerk reaction to call anyone
> >>who disagrees with you as leftist, The question is what is wrong with
> >>you that you have a total inability to learn?
>
> >>For over a decade you have been churning out the same outdated garbage
> >>as world events and national developments just pass you by in your
> >>oblivious stupor.
>
> >>Times have changed but you are still trapped in some weird time warp
> >>babbling about "leftists" and "communists"
>
> >Thanks for not even ATTEMPTING to deny that "anarchy" actually means
> >"Absence of government."
>
> Very good.
>
> Now all you need is to realize that the goal is to replace any
>democratically elected government with direct control by corporate
> elites, not infringed by any regulation and you are almost
there.

That is the case with all non-elected governments. They are or were
run, instead, by the area's presiding business leaders. Today's
democratic safeguards should be enough to prevent this.

[GOP_Decline_and_Fall]

IMHO the late Presidential election showed this to be the case. In
spite of Citizens United and the oceans of dark money thrown at it by
corporate backers the result reflected the popular vote.