Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: There is no Benghazi story....just a huge flow of Republican bullshit

1 view
Skip to first unread message
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

klattu

unread,
May 13, 2013, 6:54:10 AM5/13/13
to
On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:48:50 -0500, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:

>On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
><tlb0p8po81iktu9hd...@4ax.com>, Yoor...@Jurgis.net
>says...
>
>> IDIOT
>
>
>Liar


O'Bammy and crew covered up Benghazi faster than a cat covering it's
shit.....someone stepped in it, and now the smell is has become
overwhelming. Now threats of demotions and loss of jobs for whistle
blowers are rampant by the Chicago thug leadership in Washington.

I suppose 4 dead Americans is a "no story"for Demoncrats when their
party controls the white house....



klattu
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Transition Zone

unread,
May 14, 2013, 4:54:39 PM5/14/13
to
On May 12, 9:48 pm, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
> <tlb0p8po81iktu9hd4h04ht1b8rq0ld...@4ax.com>, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net
> says...
>
> > IDIOT
>
> Liar

Republican's last words: Benghazi, Dr Gosnell, Benghazi, Dr Gosnell,
Benghazi, Dr Gosnell !!!!

Kirby Grant

unread,
May 15, 2013, 9:34:19 AM5/15/13
to
Don't forget "ga ga boo boo" and other non-sensical sounds that are made by
little babies.
Message has been deleted

PrecisionmachinisT

unread,
May 15, 2013, 12:20:46 PM5/15/13
to

<Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig> wrote in message news:6967p8dufqj26p28i...@4ax.com...
> Glenn Beck- Why Obama Hid the Truth of Benghazi ?

Another Republican sideshow....

--Christopher Stevens was twice offered additional security and both times, he declined.

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/report-stevens-declined-security-91406.html?ml=la

FirstPost

unread,
May 15, 2013, 1:29:38 PM5/15/13
to
So the fact that the CIA gave weeks in advance warning to the state
department and reports were rewritten in order to CYA Clinton, Obama
and others and the bald faced lie that a video clip that at that point
had only been viewed by around 300 people was the cause aren't
important?
Get a clue and give up on the stupid simple minded statements. Such
things are obviously way too far above your head for your level of
comprehension.

PrecisionmachinisT

unread,
May 15, 2013, 2:20:26 PM5/15/13
to

"FirstPost" <AIOE_posters_...@AIOE.org> wrote in message news:05h7p8l5m5dak9tuf...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:20:46 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
> <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig> wrote in message news:6967p8dufqj26p28i...@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 14 May 2013 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
>>> <mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 12, 9:48 pm, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
>>>>> <tlb0p8po81iktu9hd4h04ht1b8rq0ld...@4ax.com>, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net
>>>>> says...
>>>>>
>>>>> > IDIOT
>>>>>
>>>>> Liar
>>>>
>>>>Republican's last words: Benghazi, Dr Gosnell, Benghazi, Dr Gosnell,
>>>>Benghazi, Dr Gosnell !!!!
>>>
>>> Glenn Beck- Why Obama Hid the Truth of Benghazi ?
>>
>>Another Republican sideshow....
>>
>>--Christopher Stevens was twice offered additional security and both times, he declined.
>>
>>http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/report-stevens-declined-security-91406.html?ml=la
>
> So the fact that the CIA gave weeks in advance warning to the state
> department and reports were rewritten in order to CYA Clinton, Obama

Keep the bullshit flowing...

> and others and the bald faced lie that a video clip that at that point
> had only been viewed by around 300 people was the cause aren't
> important?
> Get a clue and give up on the stupid simple minded statements. Such
> things are obviously way too far above your head for your level of
> comprehension.

KooK


STEADY EDDY

unread,
May 15, 2013, 2:41:29 PM5/15/13
to
This is a story about fallible human beings making a mistake. Instead
of trying to learn about better ways to prevent this type of attack in
the future the Republicans want to play the blame game. It was her
fault or his fault whatever. More politics instead of solving the
problem

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 15, 2013, 2:48:49 PM5/15/13
to
STEADY EDDY <steady...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4a268e31-a102-4dab-
ae9f-ae9...@li6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:

> This is a story about fallible human beings making a mistake. Instead
> of trying to learn about better ways to prevent this type of attack in
> the future the Republicans want to play the blame game. It was her
> fault or his fault whatever. More politics instead of solving the
> problem

This would be fine...except you forgot to mention that the president, the
secretary of state and the ambassador to the United Nations all lied to
the American people. While Ambassador Rice may not have knowingly lied,
it is now very clear that Obama and Mrs. Clinton DID lie knowingly.

That issue cannot, and will not, be swept under the rug.

--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/

Leftists think and act like protofascists. Control is the key. And
control through fear, threat of force, and rhetorical intimidation
is the modus operandi. (Ben Shapro, "Bullies")

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 15, 2013, 3:26:22 PM5/15/13
to

"Joe Cooper" <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote in message
news:XnsA1C182FF979...@78.46.70.116...

>
> This would be fine...except you forgot to mention that the president, the
> secretary of state and the ambassador to the United Nations all lied to
> the American people. While Ambassador Rice may not have knowingly lied,
> it is now very clear that Obama and Mrs. Clinton DID lie knowingly.

Nothing was forgotten. Your definition of "lie" defies common sense, logic
and the English language.

An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.

What is not a lie is telling the American people that terrorists, perhaps
emboldened by actions in Egypt, killed American diplomats then correcting
the syntax of that statement three days later.

The bottom line is that the American people through their voting, giving
Obama a 5.9 MILLION vote margin thus recognizing the GOP members of congress
as obstructionists with no plan other than to obstruct. The Republican
Party by not creating a single instance of anything to create jobs for the
middle class and countering the will of 90% of the voters by filibustering
against sensible firearms safety needed something -- ANYTHING -- to grab and
found this insignificant misuse of language and trying to turn it into the
biggest crime since the GOP orchestrated an attack on the DNC offices at the
Watergate.

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
May 15, 2013, 3:33:35 PM5/15/13
to
On May 15, 2:26 pm, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<RALeffingw...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Joe Cooper" <nieqezbmv...@tormail.org> wrote in message
Well said.

Their attempt to keep the " Benghazi issue" alive is fueled by the
fact that Ms. Clinton is likely the (winning) Democratic Presidental
candidate for 2016.

If the Republicans want to keep talking Benghazi, they might want to
explain to the American public why they refused to fund the additional
security requests from the State Department...which resulted in
insufficient security at ALL locations.

TMT

Edward A. Falk

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:16:40 PM5/15/13
to
In article <2c62ff17-49a4-4a25...@k6g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>,
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Their attempt to keep the " Benghazi issue" alive is fueled by the
>fact that Ms. Clinton is likely the (winning) Democratic Presidental
>candidate for 2016.
>
>If the Republicans want to keep talking Benghazi, they might want to
>explain to the American public why they refused to fund the additional
>security requests from the State Department...which resulted in
>insufficient security at ALL locations.

Oh, then there's this:

CNN exclusive: White House email contradicts Benghazi leaks
http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/cnn-exclusive-white-house-email-contradicts-benghazi-leaks/


--
-Ed Falk, fa...@despams.r.us.com
http://thespamdiaries.blogspot.com/

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:18:45 PM5/15/13
to
What..you mean its not Bush's Fault (tm)?

Funny how you Leftwingers suddenly change your modus operandi when its
YOUR fuckheads that screw the pooch..isnt it?

<VBG>

Gunner

--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
Raid® to a cockroach.
Sheriff Brody to a shark
Bush to a Liberal

The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
dick as a brake.

They HATE the truth."

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:15:13 PM5/15/13
to
"Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:kn0n9o$oad$1...@dont-email.me:

> Nothing was forgotten. Your definition of "lie" defies common sense,
> logic and the English language.

Hardly. We know, from sworn testimony, that Hillary Clinton was informed,
at 2:00 AM, during the attack, that there was a terror attack.

We also know that she told the American people that a video was the cause
of the attack, rather than terrorism. That was a lie, and she knew it was
a lie.

She and the Obamessiah then made a commercial for the Pakistani market
which apologized for the video, again blaming it for the terror attack.

Those are but two examples of documented lies.

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:20:28 PM5/15/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
>that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
>war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.


Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies! And you do it so very
straight faced too!!

Nice job! Sure you dont work for the DNC? You really should apply
for a job..your a natural liar!!
You will do well there!!!!!

Too_Many_Tools

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:23:14 PM5/15/13
to
On May 15, 3:15 pm, Joe Cooper <nieqezbmv...@tormail.org> wrote:
> "Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeffingw...@hotmail.com> wrote innews:kn0n9o$oad$1...@dont-email.me:
No one knew it was a "terror" attack at 2:00AM.

Again the Republicans attempt to keep the " Benghazi issue" alive is
fueled by the
fact that Ms. Clinton is likely the (winning) Democratic Presidental
candidate for 2016.


If the Republicans want to keep talking Benghazi, they might want to
explain to the American public why they refused to fund the
additional
security requests from the State Department...which resulted in
insufficient security at ALL locations.

I look forward to the Republican bloodbath coming in 2014 when the
voters deal with the rightards.

TMT

Chrissy Dêgeer

unread,
May 15, 2013, 4:55:32 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>
>
> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!

It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.

PrecisionmachinisT

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:04:53 PM5/15/13
to

"Joe Cooper" <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote in message news:XnsA1C191A59FB...@78.46.70.116...
> "Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:kn0n9o$oad$1...@dont-email.me:
>
>> Nothing was forgotten. Your definition of "lie" defies common sense,
>> logic and the English language.
>
> Hardly. We know, from sworn testimony, that Hillary Clinton was informed,
> at 2:00 AM, during the attack, that there was a terror attack.
>
> We also know that she told the American people that a video was the cause
> of the attack, rather than terrorism.

When terrorists act, one excuse is as good as another.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:05:45 PM5/15/13
to

"Edward A. Falk" <fa...@rahul.net> wrote in message
news:kn0qf8$jmc$1...@blue-new.rahul.net...

>
> Oh, then there's this:
>
> CNN exclusive: White House email contradicts Benghazi leaks
>
> http://thelead.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/14/cnn-exclusive-white-house-email-contradicts-benghazi-leaks/
>

If you understand what this is about, please tell us.

UNLESS...

...this is a matter of whether our diplomats were killed by Brand X
terrorists or by Brand Y terrorists. If that's what you intend to tell us,
don't bother because life is too fuckin' short for ODing on bullshit.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 15, 2013, 6:11:53 PM5/15/13
to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7er7p8p96s2fjmnqa...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>>importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the
>>conspiracy
>>that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create
>>a
>>war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>>Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>
>
> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies! And you do it so very
> straight faced too!!

Nah... 4500 dead Americans have the straight face based on lies that morons
like the Gunner believe as the truth.

But don't get me wrong. We need morons like the Gunner! Assholes are
crucial to our economy! Someone has to buy those overpriced gold coins
Glenn Beck and Mark Levin sell.

Tom Gardner

unread,
May 15, 2013, 7:40:06 PM5/15/13
to
On 5/15/2013 1:29 PM, FirstPost wrote:
> So the fact that the CIA gave weeks in advance warning to the state
> department and reports were rewritten in order to CYA Clinton, Obama
> and others and the bald faced lie that a video clip that at that point
> had only been viewed by around 300 people was the cause aren't
> important?
> Get a clue and give up on the stupid simple minded statements. Such
> things are obviously way too far above your head for your level of
> comprehension.
>

Plonk the asshole! His monotone left diatribe doesn't want to be seen
by anyone, even second hand.

Tom Gardner

unread,
May 15, 2013, 7:44:54 PM5/15/13
to
Who's "Bush"? What does "Bush" have to do with Obama and Clinton lying
about a terrorist attack they have conquered terrorism before a
presidential election? Are you that confused?
Message has been deleted

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 15, 2013, 11:12:58 PM5/15/13
to

"Tom Gardner" <Mars@Tacks> wrote in message
news:GbSdnRuTG5tlgAnM...@giganews.com...
If anyone is confused it's you. Your problem is that you have been around
Republican shit so long, you have no idea what the truth is.

Bush is a fool and Cheney is a liar whose only interest in Iraq was in the
cause of no-bid contracts from Eric Prince and for Halliburton.

If you had an IQ greater than 70 I would explain that a lie is telling
everyone that Iraq is building nuke-you-lar weapons and we need to go to war
with Iraq. And, oh yeah... we need million dollar mercenaries from
Blackwater and $150 per hour truck drivers from Halliburton.

An educated guess that's wrong is telling people that US diplomats were
killed by Brand X terrorists when they were really killed by Brand Y
terrorists then correcting yourself three days later.

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 16, 2013, 3:00:30 AM5/16/13
to
Too_Many_Tools <too_man...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:9d0b2f4f-1b62-
424b-ab15-5...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com:

> No one knew it was a "terror" attack at 2:00AM.

Wrong. Sorry you missed the testimony of Mr. Hicks before Congress. He
testified that he called Mrs. Clinton at 2:00 AM and TOLD HER the
consulate was under attack. He did not mention a "riot" or
"demonstration," he told her the consulate was UNDER ATTACK.

No video.
No demonstration that got out of hand.
No riot.

Clinton lied, Americans died.

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 16, 2013, 3:02:32 AM5/16/13
to
Tom Gardner <Mars@Tacks> wrote in news:GbSdnRuTG5tlgAnMnZ2dnUVZ_o-
dn...@giganews.com:

> Who's "Bush"? What does "Bush" have to do with Obama and Clinton lying
> about a terrorist attack they have conquered terrorism before a
> presidential election? Are you that confused?

Confused? Hell, no. They just need to change the subject and deflect
attention from Benghazi and the lies told by Obama, Clinton and
Ambassador Rice...not to mention Jay Carney, who was exposed today as a
liar with respect to the editing of the Benghazi talking points.

It's no wonder proggies don't want to talk about Benghazi.

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 16, 2013, 3:04:11 AM5/16/13
to
"Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote in
news:kn10kj$cod$1...@dont-email.me:

> ...this is a matter of whether our diplomats were killed by Brand X
> terrorists or by Brand Y terrorists. If that's what you intend to
> tell us, don't bother because life is too fuckin' short for ODing on
> bullshit.

It's "about" this:

Obama lied.
Clinton lied.
Ambassador Rice lied.
Jay Carney lied.

You're welcome.

Tom Gardner

unread,
May 16, 2013, 10:18:51 AM5/16/13
to
On 5/16/2013 3:02 AM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Tom Gardner <Mars@Tacks> wrote in news:GbSdnRuTG5tlgAnMnZ2dnUVZ_o-
> dn...@giganews.com:
>
>> Who's "Bush"? What does "Bush" have to do with Obama and Clinton lying
>> about a terrorist attack they have conquered terrorism before a
>> presidential election? Are you that confused?
>
> Confused? Hell, no. They just need to change the subject and deflect
> attention from Benghazi and the lies told by Obama, Clinton and
> Ambassador Rice...not to mention Jay Carney, who was exposed today as a
> liar with respect to the editing of the Benghazi talking points.
>
> It's no wonder proggies don't want to talk about Benghazi.
>


The like the thrill down the leg. Soon to be pee!

PrecisionmachinisT

unread,
May 16, 2013, 7:31:27 PM5/16/13
to

<Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig> wrote in message news:9mb8p855g38inssna...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:20:46 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
> <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
> Who's to say the article is true? Who ever claims Ambassador Stevens
> said he declined security isn't identified in the article.

Even if true, what the fuck would it have to do with anything ?

Obviously, he declined, otherwise there would have been additional security..

> As
> important as this revelation 'is', anyone can claim anything
> anonymously.

"Revelation" ?

Have you been drinking or are you just dumber than a stump ?

> That unnamed source has nothing to fear from the Right. Only from the

"unnamed source" ?

"In his Feb. 7 testimony before the House Armed Services Committee, Army Gen. Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said the military was aware of the Aug. 16 cable and that someone had turned down Ham's offer."

"Referring to the cable, Dempsey said: "I was aware of it, because it came in, in Gen. Ham's report. Gen. Ham actually called the embassy to, to see if they wanted to extend the special security team there and was said - and was told no."


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/amb-stevens-twice-said-no-to-military.html#.UZOc0ZZSl3F#storylink=cpy> Left is there threats of violence and vulgar outbursts.

Pure gibberish...

> Knowing the utter contempt the Marxist turned Fascist has for truth

You probably should cut back on the fruitcake...

> Nothing in your articles says Stevens meant security in Libya. For all

The article says that General Ham offered Stevens security in Libya. Twice.

You really should learn to read.

> we know Ambassador Stevens was referring to security from the airport
> to his villa in the alps.

Sorry, there is no "we"

--
Message has been deleted

RichTravsky

unread,
May 18, 2013, 12:38:01 AM5/18/13
to
CB wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 09:20:46 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
> <123mac...@notmail.com> wrote:
> ><Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig> wrote in message
> >> On Tue, 14 May 2013 13:54:39 -0700 (PDT), Transition Zone
> >> <mog...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>On May 12, 9:48 pm, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
> >>>> <tlb0p8po81iktu9hd4h04ht1b8rq0ld...@4ax.com>, Yoorg...@Jurgis.net
> >>>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> > IDIOT
> >>>>
> >>>> Liar
> >>>
> >>>Republican's last words: Benghazi, Dr Gosnell, Benghazi, Dr Gosnell,
> >>>Benghazi, Dr Gosnell !!!!
> >>
> >> Glenn Beck- Why Obama Hid the Truth of Benghazi ?
> >
> >Another Republican sideshow....
> >
> >--Christopher Stevens was twice offered additional security and both times, he declined.
> >
> >http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/report-stevens-declined-security-91406.html?ml=la
>
> Who's to say the article is true? Who ever claims Ambassador Stevens
> said he declined security isn't identified in the article. As

The Defense Department has not disavowed the officials' comments. Get
over it

> important as this revelation 'is', anyone can claim anything
> anonymously.
>
> That unnamed source as nothing to fear from the Right. Only from the
> Left is there threats of violence and vulgar outbursts.

Wrong. The cons do not want this to pull the rug out from under them.

> Knowing the utter contempt the Marxist turned Fascist has for truth

What marxist? Is someone presides over a record breaking capitalist
institution a marxist? HAHAHAH

> Nothing in your articles says Stevens meant security in Libya. For all

Idiot. The whole article is about that.

> we know Ambassador Stevens was referring to security from the airport
> to his villa in the alps.

HAHAHH

that's desperate even from you.

PrecisionmachinisT

unread,
May 18, 2013, 1:51:34 AM5/18/13
to

<Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @ 7/11.nig> wrote in message
news:rs6bp8pk264g5ecmq...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 16 May 2013 16:31:27 -0700, "PrecisionmachinisT"
> " someone had turned down Ham's offer"...sorry, there's no there

Exceot Dempsey...

> there, it's all double speak with Dempsey's name on it. Ham? I made a
> ham sambitch the other day.
>
> Who be, "someone?"...Deepthroat?
>

No, it was Dempsey that said it, you idiot.

>
> Let's see either Genral Ham and Dempsey testify to what you

The comments above were made by Dempsey, and General Ham.

Are you saying that if they were asked to "testify" then they might decide
to retract their previous statements ?

> allege...anything else is BS and you know it.
>

What I know, is that I've snagged me a real nut job.

>>
>>
>>Read more here:
>>http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/amb-stevens-twice-said-no-to-military.html#.UZOc0ZZSl3F#storylink=cpy>
>>Left is there threats of violence and vulgar outbursts.
>>
>>Pure gibberish...
>>
>>> Knowing the utter contempt the Marxist turned Fascist has for truth
>>
>>You probably should cut back on the fruitcake...
>>
>>> Nothing in your articles says Stevens meant security in Libya. For all
>>
>>The article says that General Ham offered Stevens security in Libya.
>>Twice.
>
> BS
>

Baloney...

It even says so in in the article headline, for Christ's sake...

--what are you, retarded ?


>>
>>You really should learn to read.
>
> Stevens was never mention you liar
>

His name was in the fucking headline, you fucking imbecile.

RichTravsky

unread,
May 18, 2013, 1:54:21 AM5/18/13
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
> >importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
> >that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
> >war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
> >Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>
> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies! And you do it so very
> straight faced too!!
>
> Nice job! Sure you dont work for the DNC? You really should apply
> for a job..your a natural liar!!
> You will do well there!!!!!

That's a fine job of idiocy! Sure you don't work for the RNC?

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-500257_162-562312.html
February 11, 2009

Amid questions about prewar intelligence, the White House is
acknowledging that President Bush was incorrect when he said in his
State of the Union address that Iraq recently had sought significant
quantities of uranium in Africa.

Claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were a primary
justification for the war, but U.S. forces have yet to find any such
weapons.
...
The president's statement in the State of the Union was incorrect
because it was based on forged documents from the African nation of
Niger, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Monday.

"The president's statement was based on the predicate of the yellow
cake" uranium "from Niger," Fleischer told reporters. "So given the
fact that the report on the yellow cake did not turn out to be
accurate, that is reflective of the president's broader statement."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
...
In his January 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George
W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein
recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." This
single sentence is now known as "the Sixteen Words." The administration
later conceded that evidence in support of the claim was inconclusive
and stated, "These sixteen words should never have been included." The
administration attributed the error to the CIA. In mid-2003, the U.S.
government declassified the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which
contained a dissenting opinion published by the U.S. Department of State
stating that the intelligence connecting Niger to Saddam Hussein was
"highly suspect," primarily because State Department's intelligence
agency analysts did not believe that Niger would be likely to engage
in such a transaction due to a French consortium which maintained close
control over the Nigerien uranium industry.
...

Well well, lookee there. "highly suspect" in 2002!

ring ring

RNC on line 2!

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 18, 2013, 7:49:29 AM5/18/13
to
Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising

Gunner

--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
RaidŽ to a cockroach.

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 18, 2013, 7:51:29 AM5/18/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 23:12:58 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Tom Gardner" <Mars@Tacks> wrote in message
>news:GbSdnRuTG5tlgAnM...@giganews.com...
So you refuse to answer the question. Not surprising for a liar.

And you even forged the nym you are using.



--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
RaidŽ to a cockroach.

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 18, 2013, 7:52:51 AM5/18/13
to
On Wed, 15 May 2013 18:11:53 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
<RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:

>
>"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7er7p8p96s2fjmnqa...@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>>>importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the
>>>conspiracy
>>>that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create
>>>a
>>>war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>>>Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>>
>>
>> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies! And you do it so very
>> straight faced too!!
>
>Nah... 4500 dead Americans have the straight face based on lies that morons
>like the Gunner believe as the truth.
>
>But don't get me wrong. We need morons like the Gunner! Assholes are
>crucial to our economy! Someone has to buy those overpriced gold coins
>Glenn Beck and Mark Levin sell.

Odd...I dont buy gold. And is their gold coins overpriced?

More Lies from the Left.

Thats all you dumb bastards have.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 18, 2013, 10:42:08 AM5/18/13
to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:joqep8pees0j318lm...@4ax.com...

> So you refuse to answer the question.

So now I have to take orders from a lying pile of shit on a power trip.
Nice try asshole.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 18, 2013, 10:43:49 AM5/18/13
to

"Gunner Asch" <gunne...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:tkqep85vlkllmo1d6...@4ax.com...

> Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies.

Why is it so difficult to admit that you are so fucking stupid that you
actually BELIEVE everything Cheney tells you including the load of
fissionable materials allegedly sent from Africa to Iraq?

Message has been deleted

pyotr filipivich

unread,
May 18, 2013, 2:09:28 PM5/18/13
to
Gunner Asch <gunne...@gmail.com> on Sat, 18 May 2013 04:49:29 -0700
typed in rec.crafts.metalworking the following:
>On Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:32 -0700, Chrissy Dęgeer
><wieber.blôws@taft_sucks.con> wrote:
>
>>On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>>> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>>>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
>>>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
>>>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>>>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!
>>
>>It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.
>
>Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
>toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising

Chrissy has no ethical guidelines, save that what ever Republicans
do, they can do too.

It isn't whether or not the act itself is ... well, they don't
have the concepts of Good/Evil, just "acceptable and not-acceptable,
for me."
So how are they to know what to do, lest a Republican show them
the way?
--
pyotr filipivich
"With Age comes Wisdom. Although more often, Age travels alone."

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 18, 2013, 3:58:59 PM5/18/13
to
So you admit to refusing to answer the question. Thats not..in the
least..surprising. Afterall..you are a Leftwinger...and you are indeed
mentally ill. So answering questions that would interfer with the
'private world" in your head....is contraindicated.

And to set the reply to your home newsgroup: alt.idiots.....typical of
leftwingers.

Read my sig...its all about you and yours. <VBG>

Leftwingers, dumber than dog shit and crazier than a bag of dead rats.

Gunner

Gunner Asch

unread,
May 18, 2013, 4:00:52 PM5/18/13
to
Read my sig...its all about you and yours.

Fixed that reply to thingy. Its something I always check before
hitting send, when dealing with Leftwingers. You poor mental cases
always lie and try this sort of shit. Which is why you will be killed
soon. Shrug


--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
Raid� to a cockroach.

STEADY EDDY

unread,
May 18, 2013, 5:36:08 PM5/18/13
to
On May 15, 11:48 am, Joe Cooper <nieqezbmv...@tormail.org> wrote:
> STEADY EDDY <steadyedd...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:4a268e31-a102-4dab-
> ae9f-ae918e64f...@li6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
>
> > This is a story about fallible human beings making a mistake. Instead
> > of trying to learn about better ways to prevent this type of attack in
> > the future the Republicans want to play the blame game. It was her
> > fault or his fault whatever. More politics instead of solving the
> > problem
>
> This would be fine...except you forgot to mention that the president, the
> secretary of state and the ambassador to the United Nations all lied to
> the American people. While Ambassador Rice may not have knowingly lied,
> it is now very clear that Obama and Mrs. Clinton DID lie knowingly.
>
> That issue cannot, and will not, be swept under the rug.

Yes it will, watch and learn how Washington works. The political power
in Washington is with the Democrats. Nothing will happen. There is
nothing to "sweep under the rug".

Joe Cooper

unread,
May 19, 2013, 10:10:09 AM5/19/13
to
STEADY EDDY <steady...@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:2ceaa38e-059a-4d74...@vx13g2000pbb.googlegroups.com:
Really? How about these items:

Where was Obama during the attack?

Who ordered Ambassador Rice to lie to the American people?

Who twice ordered special ops personnel in Tripoli to stand down?

Why was C-110, which could have put boots on the ground in less than six
hours, not deployed?

Who decided not to send the Foreign Emergency Support Team to Benghazi?

Where are the orders Obama claimed to have issued on the night of the
attack?

Why did the Accountability Review Board not interview survivors?

Why did President Obama and Hillary Clinton lie to the American people
when they both knew that their video story was bogus?

Transition Zone

unread,
May 19, 2013, 2:40:05 PM5/19/13
to
On May 12, 11:13 pm, BeamMeUpScotty
<ThenDestroyEveryth...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote:
> On 5/12/2013 9:58 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "AlleyCat" <al...@aohell.com> wrote in message
> >news:MPG.2bfa0158f...@news.eternal-september.org...
> >> On Sun, 12 May 2013 12:49:16 -0400, In article <kmogvm$sop$1@dont-
> >> email.me>, sid9@ bellsouth.net says...
>
> >> Wow... can't even write your own bullshit. You have to post another
> >> Obama dick sucker's shit? How long is the line to suck this man's dick?
>
> >> Why would ANYONE deny that this is a cover-up? Because these nerds think
> >> they have to protect their Muslim-in-chief from the bad ole boogie-man
> >> Republicans. Why? If he's not guilty, why defend him so vociferously?
>
> >> Because you know he's guilty, and you don't want the gay rights
> >> advancements to be turned back, right?
>
> >> The REAL Obama... not the flip-flopper telling people what they want to
> >> hear JUST for votes. This man has whored himself out to every liberal
> >> cause celeb, just so the biggest voting block will wuv him... stupid
> >> white women.
>
> > 1. Obama's not running for re-election  McConnell/Boehner worked hard
> > and long and lost that one
>
> > 2. More Benghazi bullshit will not save the Republican party
>
> But maybe it will save some of our Ambassadors lives or maybe a few
> lower level diplomats and their security.

Did it save the Bush diplomat back then in 2006?
=============================

U.S. Diplomat Killed in Pakistan Bombing
By Tina, on March 2nd, 2006
Zarar Khan | Karachi | Mar 2

AP – A suicide attacker rammed a car packed with explosives into a
vehicle carrying an American diplomat in Pakistan’s largest city,
killing four people – including the diplomat – ahead of President
Bush’s visit to Pakistan...

Sid9

unread,
May 19, 2013, 2:47:27 PM5/19/13
to

"Transition Zone" <mog...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:980469a6-88c0-4893...@z8g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...
> AP � A suicide attacker rammed a car packed with explosives into a
> vehicle carrying an American diplomat in Pakistan�s largest city,
> killing four people � including the diplomat � ahead of President
> Bush�s visit to Pakistan...
.
.

The GOP has nothing on Obama or his administration so they need to create
crises to keep themselves relevant.

What can they do repeal Obamacare the 38th and 39th time?

opel

unread,
May 19, 2013, 2:58:39 PM5/19/13
to
On 5/19/2013 12:40 PM, Transition Zone wrote:
>> But maybe it will save some of our Ambassadors lives or maybe a few
>> >lower level diplomats and their security.
> Did it save the Bush diplomat back then in 2006?

Is your answer to all of Obama's crimes still Bush?

opel

unread,
May 19, 2013, 3:01:14 PM5/19/13
to
On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
> The GOP has nothing on Obama

Dream on you senile old man.

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
May 19, 2013, 4:41:22 PM5/19/13
to

> On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>> The GOP has nothing on Obama

Obama has never done anything... it was all Bush.


In fact Obama might try to show up for work one day soon!

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
May 19, 2013, 4:48:00 PM5/19/13
to
Yes and the the 238 and 239th time.....


And every day until Americans are FREE PEOPLE once again.


--


*Rumination*
#61 - You can't write computer code that is irrational and expect it to
work. This Liberal-Socialist Matrix is flawed and failing.

clairbear

unread,
May 19, 2013, 5:45:30 PM5/19/13
to
opel <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote in news:knb72b$ptp$1...@dont-email.me:
It ia always blame Bush the have no other defense of their own
indefensibles
Message has been deleted

Sid9

unread,
May 19, 2013, 10:52:33 PM5/19/13
to

"BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
message news:kNamt.30796$d9.1...@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com...
He gets to work a lot more than the now sun-oranged John B�hner does, that�s
for sure.
B�hner getting darker than the president

RichTravsky

unread,
May 19, 2013, 11:24:02 PM5/19/13
to
CB wrote:
> No, I just know the plausible deniability act you 'Progressives have
> evolved from truth' have perfected.

Only a moron would come up the "villa in the alps" nonsense.

opel

unread,
May 19, 2013, 11:57:12 PM5/19/13
to
Tanning salon - 5 minutes out of a day.

Your lies - 24/7.

BIG BIRD

unread,
May 20, 2013, 12:16:58 AM5/20/13
to

"opel" <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote in message news:knb777$ptp$1...@dont-email.me...
: On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
: > The GOP has nothing on Obama
:
: Dream on you senile old man.
:


suck his dick and he'll have some wet dreams


BIG BIRD

unread,
May 20, 2013, 12:17:25 AM5/20/13
to

"opel" <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote in message news:knc6k2$bp6$5...@dont-email.me...
: On 5/19/2013 8:52 PM, Sid9 wrote:
: >
: > "BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
: > message news:kNamt.30796$d9.1...@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com...
: >>
: >>> On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
: >>>> The GOP has nothing on Obama
: >>
: >> Obama has never done anything... it was all Bush.
: >>
: >>
: >> In fact Obama might try to show up for work one day soon!
: >
: > He gets to work a lot more than the now sun-oranged John Böhner does,
: > that’s for sure.
: > Böhner getting darker than the president
:
: Tanning salon - 5 minutes out of a day.
:
: Your lies - 24/7.
:


dick in your fat mouth, 24/7/365


BIG BIRD

unread,
May 20, 2013, 12:18:01 AM5/20/13
to

"opel" <ad...@novalid.org.> wrote in message news:knb72b$ptp$1...@dont-email.me...
:

is your answer to everything to suck a slimy,stinkin, angry, old rich white man's
dirty dick ??


Message has been deleted

GOP_Decline_and_Fall

unread,
May 20, 2013, 1:51:01 AM5/20/13
to
On Mon, 20 May 2013 01:32:31 -0400, Obama's Legion of Flash Mobs @
7/11.nig wrote:

>On Sun, 19 May 2013 21:24:02 -0600, RichTravsky
>No 'where' does Ambassador Stevens describe 'where' he means. For all
>we know he was talking about security from the airport to his crib on
>duh sout side of Chicago. In which case he'd need lots of armor there
>too.

Wow..three dead horses in one psychotic subject line.

Desperate much?

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/05/14/191235/amb-stevens-twice-said-no-to-military.html#.UZmzmHwnBrw

�In light of the uncertain security environment, US Mission Benghazi
will submit specific requests to US Embassy Tripoli for additional
physical security upgrades and staffing needs by separate cover,� said
the cable, which was first reported by Fox News.

Army Gen. Carter Ham, then the head of the U.S. Africa Command, did
not wait for the separate cable, however. Instead, after reading the
Aug. 16 cable, Ham phoned Stevens and asked if the embassy needed a
special security team from the U.S. military. Stevens told Ham it did
not, the officials said.

Weeks later, Stevens traveled to Germany for an already scheduled
meeting with Ham at AFRICOM headquarters. During that meeting, Ham
again offered additional military assets, and Stevens again said no,
the two officials said.

Bob

unread,
May 20, 2013, 7:00:54 AM5/20/13
to
On 5/19/2013 9:52 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>
> "BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
> message news:kNamt.30796$d9.1...@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com...
>>
>>> On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>> The GOP has nothing on Obama
>>
>> Obama has never done anything... it was all Bush.
>>
>>
>> In fact Obama might try to show up for work one day soon!
>
> He gets to work a lot more than the now sun-oranged John Böhner does,
> that’s for sure.
> Böhner getting darker than the president

Why is the Obama defense always "well, someone else is bad too"?

Sid9

unread,
May 20, 2013, 10:10:21 AM5/20/13
to

"Bob" <daln...@att.net> wrote in message
news:a84ef$519a0268$7f000001$23...@news.flashnewsgroups.com...
.
.
.
Is Böhner's House getting anything done?
Ans: No., nothing, nada, zero.
So he must he out playing golf

Message has been deleted

BeamMeUpScotty

unread,
May 20, 2013, 11:56:34 AM5/20/13
to
On 5/19/2013 11:57 PM, opel wrote:
> On 5/19/2013 8:52 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>
>> "BeamMeUpScotty" <ThenDestro...@blackhole.nebulax.com> wrote in
>> message news:kNamt.30796$d9.1...@en-nntp-12.dc1.easynews.com...
>>>
>>>> On 5/19/2013 12:47 PM, Sid9 wrote:
>>>>> The GOP has nothing on Obama
>>>
>>> Obama has never done anything... it was all Bush.
>>>
>>>
>>> In fact Obama might try to show up for work one day soon!
>>
>> He gets to work a lot more than the now sun-oranged John Böhner does,
>> that’s for sure.
>> Böhner getting darker than the president
>
> Tanning salon - 5 minutes out of a day.

10% ObamaCare Federal tax....




Don Winslow

unread,
May 20, 2013, 1:01:23 PM5/20/13
to
On 5/13/2013 6:54 AM, klattu wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 20:48:50 -0500, AlleyCat <al...@aohell.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
>> <tlb0p8po81iktu9hd...@4ax.com>, Yoor...@Jurgis.net
>> says...
>>
>>> IDIOT
>>
>>
>> Liar
>
>
> O'Bammy and crew covered up Benghazi faster than a cat covering it's
> shit.....someone stepped in it, and now the smell is has become
> overwhelming. Now threats of demotions and loss of jobs for whistle
> blowers are rampant by the Chicago thug leadership in Washington.
>
> I suppose 4 dead Americans is a "no story"for Demoncrats when their
> party controls the white house....
>
Suppose this was a Republican Administration, how would the Benghazi
affair be treated by the Press other Republicans and Democrats?
>
>
> klattu
>

clairbear

unread,
May 20, 2013, 8:07:09 PM5/20/13
to
"Sid9" <sid9@ bellsouth.net> wrote in news:kndaku$lgn$1...@dont-email.me:
Actually sid the have done alot but harry reid and his minions have
obstructed every thing the house has sent them But then you seniler blind
ass can't see the truth for the dnc smoke screen

RichTravsky

unread,
May 22, 2013, 1:11:56 AM5/22/13
to
Obama's, Legion, of, Flash, Mobs, @, 7/11.nig wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 May 2013 21:24:02 -0600, RichTravsky
> No 'where' does Ambassador Stevens describe 'where' he means. For all
> we know he was talking about security from the airport to his crib on
> duh sout side of Chicago. In which case he'd need lots of armor there
> too.

HAHAHAH You're really desperate here. Please tell us about this "villa
in the alps" ->

RichTravsky

unread,
May 22, 2013, 1:12:59 AM5/22/13
to
CB bitch slapped rather soundly...

Scottie

unread,
May 22, 2013, 2:21:01 PM5/22/13
to
On 5/12/2013 9:48 PM, AlleyCat wrote:
> On Sun, 12 May 2013 18:09:22 -0600, In article
> <tlb0p8po81iktu9hd...@4ax.com>, Yoor...@Jurgis.net
> says...
>
>> IDIOT
>
>
> Liar
>
Four loyal Americans sacrificed for Obama's re-election. Then cover-up.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
May 22, 2013, 4:09:30 PM5/22/13
to

"Scottie" <Sco...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:g08nt.147050$kO.7...@fx14.fr7...
>
> Four loyal Americans sacrificed for Obama's re-election. Then cover-up.

The voters knew about the killings. That's why Obama only carried the
popular vote by a SCANT 5.9 MILLION votes instead of 6 million votes.

RichTravsky

unread,
May 25, 2013, 12:32:20 AM5/25/13
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:32 -0700, Chrissy D�geer
> <wieber.bl�ws@taft_sucks.con> wrote:
>
> >On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
> >> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
> >>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
> >>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
> >>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
> >>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!
> >
> >It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.
>
> Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
> toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> "You guess the truth hurts?
>
> Really?
>
> "Hurt" aint the word.
>
> For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
> Sunlight to a vampire.
> Raid� to a cockroach.
> Sheriff Brody to a shark
> Bush to a Liberal
>
> The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
> up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
> dick as a brake.
>
> They HATE the truth."
>

You cons don't do anything BUT lie. But..shrug..you poor
toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising

Here's some truth you've as painful as a red hot poker up your ass:

http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-500257_162-562312.html
February 11, 2009

Amid questions about prewar intelligence, the White House is
acknowledging that President Bush was incorrect when he said in his
State of the Union address that Iraq recently had sought significant
quantities of uranium in Africa.

Claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were a primary
justification for the war, but U.S. forces have yet to find any such
weapons.
...
The president's statement in the State of the Union was incorrect
because it was based on forged documents from the African nation of
Niger, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Monday.

"The president's statement was based on the predicate of the yellow
cake" uranium "from Niger," Fleischer told reporters. "So given the
fact that the report on the yellow cake did not turn out to be
accurate, that is reflective of the president's broader statement."


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries
...
In his January 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George
W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein
recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." This
single sentence is now known as "the Sixteen Words." The administration
later conceded that evidence in support of the claim was inconclusive
and stated, "These sixteen words should never have been included." The
administration attributed the error to the CIA. In mid-2003, the U.S.
government declassified the 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, which
contained a dissenting opinion published by the U.S. Department of State
stating that the intelligence connecting Niger to Saddam Hussein was
"highly suspect," primarily because State Department's intelligence
agency analysts did not believe that Niger would be likely to engage
in such a transaction due to a French consortium which maintained close
control over the Nigerien uranium industry.
...

RichTravsky

unread,
May 25, 2013, 12:30:38 AM5/25/13
to

RichTravsky

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 6:38:35 PM6/9/13
to
Gunner Asch wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:32 -0700, Chrissy Dęgeer
> <wieber.blôws@taft_sucks.con> wrote:
>
> >On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
> >> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
> >> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
> >>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the conspiracy
> >>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create a
> >>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
> >>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!
> >
> >It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.
>
> Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
> toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising
>
> Gunner
>
> --
> "You guess the truth hurts?
>
> Really?
>
> "Hurt" aint the word.
>
> For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
> Sunlight to a vampire.
> RaidŽ to a cockroach.

Johnny Johnson

unread,
Jun 9, 2013, 8:57:54 PM6/9/13
to
In article <51B503EB...@hotmail.com>, traRvE...@hotmail.com says...
>
> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:32 -0700, Chrissy Dêgeer
>> <wieber.blôws@taft_sucks.con> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>
>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>>>> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>>>>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the
conspiracy
>>>>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create
a
>>>>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>>>>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!
>>>
>>>It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.
>>
>> Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
>> toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising
>>
>> Gunner
>>
>> --
>> "You guess the truth hurts?
>>
>> Really?
>>
>> "Hurt" aint the word.
>>
>> For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
>> Sunlight to a vampire.
>> Raid® to a cockroach.
>> Sheriff Brody to a shark
>> Bush to a Liberal
>>
>> The truth doesn't just hurt. It's painful, like a red hot poker shoved
>> up their ass. Like sliding down a hundred foot razor blade using their
>> dick as a brake.
>>
>> They HATE the truth."
>
> You cons don't do anything BUT lie. But..shrug..you poor
> toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising
>
> Here's some truth you've as painful as a red hot poker up your ass:
>
> http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-500257_162-562312.html
> February 11, 2009
>
> Amid questions about prewar intelligence, the White House is
> acknowledging that President Bush was incorrect when he said in his
> State of the Union address that Iraq recently had sought significant
> quantities of uranium in Africa.
>
[ Snip the usual "But But But But ..... BUSH!?!?!" bashing ]

On point:

BREAKING: Benghazi cover-up censored by media

L. Brent Bozell III, Founder and President, Media Research Center revealed the
following:

At least five major bombshell revelations emerged during the House Oversight
Committee's hearing on the September terrorist attack in Benghazi, Libya. But
as of yet, the liberal media have done no more than pay lip service to these
revelations. And the MRC is taking action.

?The State Department knew it was a terrorist attack, but blamed it on a video.

?Commandos were denied permission to go to Benghazi and help those under
siege?even though no one knew how long the attacks would last.

?A FEST team was denied permission to go in because conditions were "too
dangerous." Yet, they wanted to go and this is exactly what they're trained
for!

?Gregory Hicks?the #2 diplomat in Libya?was demoted after complaining that that
the administration was lying!

?Secretary Clinton was never interviewed by the Accountability Review Board!

Why has there been so little coverage on an attack that cost American lives and
is now proven to be an administration cover-up? Because the liberal media want
to censor the truth in order to protect their ally in the White House. This is
a disgrace and it violates every established journalistic ethic. I hope you'll
stand with us to take action.

The victims' families deserve the truth, and YOU deserve the truth. Sign our
petition demanding the media thoroughly investigate the Benghazi scandal until
the full truth is revealed.

You can take action here:

Stop Censoring Benghazi Coverage!
http://src.personalliberty.com/ego/0b645a37-be21-4ebd-9d0d-
98bb24d78f79/400797629/300412
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Gunner Asch

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 1:56:57 AM6/10/13
to
On Sun, 9 Jun 2013 19:57:54 -0500, Johnny Johnson
<TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <51B503EB...@hotmail.com>, traRvE...@hotmail.com says...
>>
>> Gunner Asch wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 13:55:32 -0700, Chrissy Dęgeer
>>> <wieber.blôws@taft_sucks.con> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 5/15/2013 1:20 PM, Gunner Asch wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Wed, 15 May 2013 15:26:22 -0400, "Robert A. Leffingwell"
>>>>> <RALeff...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> An example of a lie is announcing in the State of the Union that Iraq is
>>>>>> importing fissionable materials out of Niger and was part of the
>conspiracy
>>>>>> that resulted in 9/11. Then the GOP used that lie as an excuse to create
>a
>>>>>> war with Iraq whose sole purpose was to provide no-bid contracts for
>>>>>> Blackwater's mercenaries and to benefit Halliburton.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thats a fine example of a bunch of lies!
>>>>
>>>>It sure is. Bush did all of that, all based on lies.
>>>
>>> Democrats do it ALL the time. Based on lies. But..shrug..you poor
>>> toads are mentally ill..so its not surprising
>>>
>>> Gunner
>>>
>>> --
>>> "You guess the truth hurts?
>>>
>>> Really?
>>>
>>> "Hurt" aint the word.
>>>
>>> For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
>>> Sunlight to a vampire.
>>> RaidŽ to a cockroach.
Its been clearly admitted by the talking heads on the Democrat MSM
that they are utterly biased and only when forced...will mention sins
and crimes committed by this administration.

When the Great Cull arrives...they will all be buried in mass graves
and America will be a much better, more informed place.


--
"You guess the truth hurts?

Really?

"Hurt" aint the word.

For Liberals, the truth is like salt to a slug.
Sunlight to a vampire.
RaidŽ to a cockroach.

Joe Cooper

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 2:32:22 PM6/10/13
to
RichTravsky <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:51B503EB.5B20A727
@hotmail.com:

> Claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were a primary
> justification for the war, but U.S. forces have yet to find any such
> weapons.

Not true - several chem labs containing degraded chemical weapons were
found, according to Wikipedia:

On June 21, 2006 the U.S. House of Representatives Permanent Select
Committee on Intelligence released key points from a classified report
from the National Ground Intelligence Center on the recovery of a small
number of degraded chemical munitions in Iraq. The report stated that
"Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions
which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent." However, all are
thought to be pre-Gulf War munitions.

These munitions meet the technical definition of weapons of mass
destruction, according to the commander of the National Ground
Intelligence Center. "These are chemical weapons as defined under the
Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of
mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services
Committee. The munitions addressed in the report were produced in the
1980s, Maples said. Badly corroded, they could not currently be used as
originally intended, though agent remaining in the weapons would be very
valuable to terrorists and insurgents, Maples said.

And the NY Post reported:

There were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after all.

The massive cache of almost 400,000 Iraq war documents released by the
WikiLeaks Web site revealed that small amounts of chemical weapons were
found in Iraq and continued to surface for years after the 2003 US
invasion, Wired magazine reported.

The documents showed that US troops continued to find chemical weapons
and labs for years after the invasion, including remnants of Saddam
Hussein's chemical weapons arsenal -- most of which had been destroyed
following the Gulf War.

In August 2004, American troops were able to buy containers from locals
of what they thought was liquid sulfur mustard, a blister agent, the
documents revealed. The chemicals were triple-sealed and taken to a
secure site.

Also in 2004, troops discovered a chemical lab in a house in Fallujah
during a battle with insurgents. A chemical cache was also found in the
city.

=30=

It would be nice if liberals would stop lying about this - it makes them
look REAL stupid.

--
Enjoy Internet Privacy And Anonymity: http://hidemyass.com/vpn/r6995:5/

Talking about Republican racism, idiocy and selfishness became dinner
table conversations for millions. President Obama's viciousness was
downgraded to "incivility," or even admired as strength by his followers.
Scapegoating Republicans for the country's woes was greeted happily and
amplified by his followers. Hatred of Republicans was a fun way for
them to bond with one another. It reinforced their sense of moral and
political superiority, as scapegoating always does. No Republican
policy was considered a well-meaning, albeit misguided, proposal aimed

Max Boot

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 2:47:45 PM6/10/13
to
[headers vandalism repaired]

On 6/10/2013 11:32 AM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> RichTravsky <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in news:51B503EB.5B20A727
> @hotmail.com:
>
>> Claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were a primary
>> justification for the war, but U.S. forces have yet to find any such
>> weapons.
>
> Not true - several chem labs containing degraded chemical weapons were
> found, according to Wikipedia:

Saddam's massive stockpiles of usable WMD were the justification for the
invasion. No usable WMD were found. There is no valid evidence that
they were spirited off to Syria or anywhere else.

The WMD claim was a lie. It was not an "intelligence failure"; it was
simply a lie.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 3:36:37 PM6/10/13
to
"Max Boot" <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in message
news:b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e$20...@EVERESTKC.NET...

>
> The WMD claim was a lie. It was not an "intelligence failure"; it was
> simply a lie.
>

Not only that but Bush's state of the union talked in detail about an
alleged shipment of fissionable material from Africa to Iraq. The Bush
Administration then claimed this material would be used as cannon shells.

The story was an outright lie uncovered by retired diplomat Joe Wilson which
in turn eventually led to the destruction of the career of Valerie Plame,
Wilson's wife, a covert operative at the CIA, by Dick Cheney or by one of
his associates.

Colin Powell who was ordered to provide the United Nations with an excuse
for the Iraqi invasion, quit his job as Secretary of State in disgust. His
son, FCC Chairman Michael Powell, was then forced to quit his job as well.

Joe Cooper

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:34:14 PM6/10/13
to
Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in news:b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e
$20...@EVERESTKC.NET:
Is that why you removed the citations I provided which showed that WMDs
were found?

Even the liberal rag the NY Post covered the story:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgNbw7
pDf7AZ3RO9qnM

Wired did, too:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-
continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

"But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years
afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter
insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction."

Hot Air:
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-
found-in-iraq/

"This isn’t exactly vindication of one of the arguments the Bush
administration gave for invading Iraq, which was that Hussein had already
begun stockpiling new WMDs and was working on nuclear weapons, but it is
another vindication of the primary reason for restarting the war: Hussein
and Iraq had violated the truce and refused to comply even after 17 UN
resolutions demanding compliance."

Spamßuster

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:43:50 PM6/10/13
to


==========================================================

KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS

==========================================================

On 6/10/2013 11:47 AM, Max Boot wrote:


Path: not-for-mail
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:47:45 -0700
From: Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509
Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.democrats.d,can.politics
Subject: Re: There is no Benghazi story....just a huge flow of Republican
bullshit
References: <XnsA1BEC53E7...@216.196.97.142>
<tlb0p8po81iktu9hd...@4ax.com>
<MPG.2bfa0280f...@news.eternal-september.org>
<8bdd7d6d-e09a-4d93...@k5g2000vbq.googlegroups.com>
<4a268e31-a102-4dab...@li6g2000pbb.googlegroups.com>
<XnsA1C182FF979...@78.46.70.116> <kn0n9o$oad$1...@dont-email.me>
<7er7p8p96s2fjmnqa...@4ax.com>
<70469$5193f69c$414e828e$15...@EVERESTKC.NET>
<tkqep85vlkllmo1d6...@4ax.com>
<51A03ED4...@hotmail.com> <51B503EB...@hotmail.com>
<XnsA1DB80583A7...@78.46.70.116>
In-Reply-To: <XnsA1DB80583A7...@78.46.70.116>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e$20...@EVERESTKC.NET>
X-Complaints-To: ab...@usenetserver.com
Organization: UseNetServer.com
Lines: 20
X-Trace: 0b3a851b61d01e4eb272b20410
X-Received-Bytes: 2361
Xref: Hurricane talk.politics.guns:1749836
rec.crafts.metalworking:978370 alt.politics.usa.republican:1496671
alt.politics.democrats:1797610 alt.politics.democrats.d:1004080
can.politics:1469634

Spamßuster

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:44:36 PM6/10/13
to


==========================================================

KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS

==========================================================

On 6/10/2013 12:36 PM, Robert A. Leffingwell wrote:


X-Received: by 10.180.37.229 with SMTP id b5mr878471wik.4.1370892998945;
Mon, 10 Jun 2013 12:36:38 -0700 (PDT)
Path: not-for-mail
From: "Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeff...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups:
talk.politics.guns,rec.crafts.metalworking,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.democrats.d,can.politics
Subject: Re: There is no Benghazi story....just a huge flow of
Republican bullshit
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:36:37 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <kp59j8$e2g$1...@dont-email.me>
<b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e$20...@EVERESTKC.NET>
Reply-To: "Robert A. Leffingwell" <RALeff...@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 19:31:52 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
posting-host="260103afbdfd5871eb6d9252b69fe180";
logging-data="14416";
mail-complaints-to="ab...@eternal-september.org";
posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18ZZPtlho93aOr7u+Tul4h6cC8YuVfIM5g="
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6002.18463
In-Reply-To: <b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e$20...@EVERESTKC.NET>
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6002.18197
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Q23S3faIHmqINt3CZcuZGD35UWY=
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Received-Bytes: 3157
Xref: Hurricane talk.politics.guns:1749848
rec.crafts.metalworking:978376 alt.politics.usa.republican:1496674
alt.politics.democrats:1797612 alt.politics.democrats.d:1004081
can.politics:1469635

Joe Cooper

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:45:00 PM6/10/13
to
=?UTF-8?B?U3BhbcOfdXN0ZXI=?= <Spamßus...@nGet.ca> wrote in news:VUqtt.181
$Xm1...@newsfe09.iad:

>
> KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS

Blow it out your shorts, KKKaren Gordon.

Max Boot

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:56:00 PM6/10/13
to
[headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]



On 6/10/2013 1:34 PM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in news:b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e
> $20...@EVERESTKC.NET:
>
>> On 6/10/2013 11:32 AM, Joe Cooper wrote:
>>> RichTravsky <traRvE...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:51B503EB.5B20A727
>>> @hotmail.com:
>>>
>>>> Claims about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were a primary
>>>> justification for the war, but U.S. forces have yet to find any
> such
>>>> weapons.
>>>
>>> Not true - several chem labs containing degraded chemical weapons were
>>> found, according to Wikipedia:
>>
>> Saddam's massive stockpiles of usable WMD were the justification for
> the
>> invasion. No usable WMD were found. There is no valid evidence that
>> they were spirited off to Syria or anywhere else.
>>
>> The WMD claim was a lie. It was not an "intelligence failure"; it was
>> simply a lie.
>
> Is that why you removed the citations I provided which showed that WMDs
> were found?

Not one of those shows that *any* usable WMD, let alone the allegedly
massive stockpiles of them, were found.


> Even the liberal rag the NY Post covered the story:
> http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgNbw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM

Does not show evidence of any usable, deliverable WMD. Dismissed.



> Wired did, too:
> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

Just repeats the same garbage from the Post. Verdict: no usable,
deliverable WMD recovered.



> "But WikiLeaks’ newly-released Iraq war documents reveal that for years
> afterward, U.S. troops continued to find chemical weapons labs, encounter
> insurgent specialists in toxins and uncover weapons of mass destruction."
>
> Hot Air:
> http://hotair.com/archives/2010/10/24/wikileaks-documents-show-wmds-found-in-iraq/
>
> "This isn’t exactly vindication of one of the arguments the Bush
> administration gave for invading Iraq, which was that Hussein had already
> begun stockpiling new WMDs and was working on nuclear weapons, but it is
> another vindication of the primary reason for restarting the war: Hussein
> and Iraq had violated the truce and refused to comply even after 17 UN
> resolutions demanding compliance."

It is not vindication of anything. It is proof of the Bush regime
lying. From the page:

“The 155mm rounds are filled with an unknown liquid, and several
of which are leaking a black tar-like substance.”

Leaking: not usable, not deliverable. No massive stockpiles or caches.



You're an obedient Bush regime flunky.

Röbert Recton

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:57:53 PM6/10/13
to
On 6/10/2013 1:43 PM, Karen Gordon, the HIV-oozing whore of Nanaimo, BC,
crapped all over the page:
>
>
> ==========================================================
>
> KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS
>
> ==========================================================

It's going to keep coming back to can.politics at least as many times as
you piss and moan about it, cunt.

Fuck off, Karen. Your time is getting short.

Röbert Recton

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 4:59:31 PM6/10/13
to
On 6/10/2013 1:44 PM, Karen Gordon, the HIV-oozing whore of Nanaimo, BC,
crapped all over the page:


>
>
> ==========================================================
>
> KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS
>
> ==========================================================

Eat shit and bark at the moon, Karen.

Joe Cooper

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 5:12:03 PM6/10/13
to
Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in
news:daac0$51b63e2d$414e828e$29...@EVERESTKC.NET:

> [headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]

I am always fascinated by the proggie obsession with homosexual acts. Do
they get it in school?

> Not one of those shows that *any* usable WMD, let alone the allegedly
> massive stockpiles of them, were found.

Sorry, Bubba, but they were THERE, just as Bush claimed they were.

>> Even the liberal rag the NY Post covered the story:
>> http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgN
>> bw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM
>
> Does not show evidence of any usable, deliverable WMD. Dismissed.

Does not show Bush lied. Dismissed.

>> Wired did, too:
>> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-contin
>> ued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
>
> Just repeats the same garbage from the Post. Verdict: no usable,
> deliverable WMD recovered.

Does not show Bush lied. Dismissed.

> Leaking: not usable, not deliverable. No massive stockpiles or
> caches.

Does not show Bush lied. Dismissed.

“In today’s political world – and for the last few decades – the biggest
bullies have been almost universally on the left. It is the left that
uses thug tactics to silence voices rather than celebrating the grand
panoply that makes up American politics. It is the left that tells
Americans that political unity is more important than freedom of speech.
It is the left that uses the clubs of race and class to attack those on
the right; it is the left that lables religious people and traditional
values people rubes and simpletons, and tells them that their perspective
has no place in the public square; it is the left that creates
environmental crises out of whole cloth, then rams remunerative measures
down our collective throats. It is the left that tells us that it is
unpatriotic to be patriotic. And most of all, it is the left that uses
our most powerful institutions – the institutions through which we
connect with each other and build common bonds – to tear us apart.” (Ben
Shapiro)

Max Boot

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 5:26:11 PM6/10/13
to
[headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]


On 6/10/2013 2:12 PM, Joe Cooper wrote:
> Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in
> news:daac0$51b63e2d$414e828e$29...@EVERESTKC.NET:
>
>> [headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]
>
> I am always fascinated by the proggie obsession with homosexual acts.

Nice try at playing The Queer Game...and failing at it, as always.


>> Not one of those shows that *any* usable WMD, let alone the allegedly
>> massive stockpiles of them, were found.
>
> Sorry, Bubba, but they were THERE,

No, Squeaky - they *weren't* "THERE".


>>> Even the liberal rag the NY Post covered the story:
>>> http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgN
>>> bw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM
>>
>> Does not show evidence of any usable, deliverable WMD. Dismissed.
>
> Does not show Bush lied.

Of course it does. He claimed there were massive stockpiles of intact,
usable WMD. He knew there weren't. The worthless and unnecessary and
illegal invasion proved it.


>>> Wired did, too:
>>> http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-contin
>>> ued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/
>>
>> Just repeats the same garbage from the Post. Verdict: no usable,
>> deliverable WMD recovered.
>
> Does not show Bush lied.

See above, Squeaky.


>> Leaking: not usable, not deliverable. No massive stockpiles or
>> caches.
>
> Does not show Bush lied.

See above, Squeaky.



> “In today’s political world – and for the last few decades – the biggest
> bullies have been almost universally on the left.

<yawn> I'm not "on the left", Squeaky.

Robert A. Leffingwell

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 5:36:52 PM6/10/13
to

"Joe Cooper" <nieqez...@tormail.org> wrote in message
news:XnsA1DB9B6A87E...@78.46.70.116...

>
> I am always fascinated by the proggie obsession with homosexual acts.

Do you think it's related to a GOP congressman having sex with underaged
male pages?

Nahhhh... GOPukes don't do things like that, right? No siree... they do
their homosexual sexual things with vice cops in the airport john.

Joe Cooper

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 6:35:35 PM6/10/13
to
Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in news:bce45$51b6453e$414e828e
$59...@EVERESTKC.NET:

> Of course it does. He claimed there were massive stockpiles of intact,
> usable WMD. He knew there weren't. The worthless and unnecessary and
> illegal invasion proved it.

Nonsense He claimed they were there, and he was correct. Saddam admitted
it in the Desert Storm ceasefire agreement.

Max Boot

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 7:04:22 PM6/10/13
to
[headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker and bootlick
repaired]


On 6/10/2013 3:35 PM, Joe Cooper, spineless bootlick, lied:

>> [headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]
>>
>>
>> On 6/10/2013 2:12 PM, Joe Cooper, spineless bootlick, lied:
>>> Max Boot <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in
>>> news:daac0$51b63e2d$414e828e$29...@EVERESTKC.NET:
>>>
>>>> [headers vandalism by gutless squat-to-piss cocksucker repaired]
>>>
>>> I am always fascinated by the proggie obsession with homosexual acts.
>>
>> Nice try at playing The Queer Game...and failing at it, as always.
>>
>>
>>>> Not one of those shows that *any* usable WMD, let alone the allegedly
>>>> massive stockpiles of them, were found.
>>>
>>> Sorry, Bubba, but they were THERE,
>>
>> No, Squeaky - they *weren't* "THERE".
>>
>>
>>>>> Even the liberal rag the NY Post covered the story:
>>>>> http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/us_did_find_iraq_wmd_AYiLgN
>>>>> bw7pDf7AZ3RO9qnM
>>>>
>>>> Does not show evidence of any usable, deliverable WMD. Dismissed.
>>>
>>> Does not show Bush lied.
>>
>> Of course it does. He claimed there were massive stockpiles of intact,
>> usable WMD. He knew there weren't. The worthless and unnecessary and
>> illegal invasion proved it.
>
> Nonsense He claimed they were there, and he was correct.

He claimed massive stockpiles of usable WMD were there, and he was
incorrect. In fact, it was worse than being incorrect - it was a
baldfaced and deliberate lie.

Spamßuster

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 6:58:42 PM6/10/13
to


==========================================================

KEEP IT THE HELL OUT OF CANADIAN NEWSGROUPS, THANKS

==========================================================


On 6/10/2013 3:35 PM, Joe Cooper wrote:

Röbert Recton

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 7:05:51 PM6/10/13
to
On 6/10/2013 3:58 PM, Karen Gordon, the HIV-oozing whore of Nanaimo, BC,
crapped all over the page:
>
>
Fuck off, Karen. It's here because someone much smarter than you
decided it belongs here. You'll take it and you'll like it, cunt.

Scout

unread,
Jun 10, 2013, 7:32:25 PM6/10/13
to


"Max Boot" <max....@lathymes.com> wrote in message
news:b3a8$51b61d01$414e828e$20...@EVERESTKC.NET...
Well given he was doing his best to make the world believe he still had such
a stockpile and was engaged in making it bigger and better, I'm not sure how
you can claim it was a lie rather than an intelligence failure unless you
suddenly know a whole lot more about that intelligence than all those who
saw it and agreed there was a strong risk he had WMDs on hand.

Sometimes, when you lie to be seen as a tough guy....people believe you, and
act accordingly.


It is loading more messages.
0 new messages