http://www.buffalo.edu/reporter/vol29/vol29n10/n5.html
http://archive.nandotimes.com/newsroom/ntn/health/100797/health1_11524_noframes.html
http://deafness.about.com/library/weekly/aa101397.htm?once=true&
In all fairness (a phrase that will escape the liberals), these are news
articles and opinion pieces printed in legitimate news vehicles. I just did
a quick search of the news and didn't find any disparaging writing about
Rush, either. You can't really compare these articles with the slimy
vitriol we find on this newsgroup. These are posted by post-pubescent
idiots with nothing better to do than make fun of people whose intellect
they will never comprehend, let alone achieve.
On the other hand, I don't recall even hearing about Clinton's hearing
loss, let alone hearing derisive crap coming from his usual gang of
detractors on this or any newsgroup. So you have a point.
--
---
Never look a whore's gift in the mouth.
tos...@aol.com
ab...@aol.com
ab...@yahoo.com
ab...@hotmail.com
ab...@msn.com
ab...@sprint.com
ab...@earthlink.com
u...@ftc.gov
"Chief Justice Wells" <"Read My Dissent "@
http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/OP-SC00-2431.pdf> wrote in message
news:DMHw7.114626$5A3.34...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com...
Of course, Clinton was the popularly twice elected president, and Rush
is the guy who broadcast for three hours that Hillary had murdered
Vince Foster in her Georgetown appartment and had the body moved by
the Secret Service to some park.
Also, Mr. Clinton doesn't refer to the National Association of Women
as the NAGS.
The absolutely couldn't have happened to a more deserving soul.
most conservatives aren't hate mongers any more than most liberals
are. Rush, on the other hand, is a hate monger. When you've made your
millions by preaching hate and sneering at others you don't get much
sympathy when you have some trouble yourself.
Hate? No. But the phrase poetic justice does come to mind.
As ye sow, so shall ye reap.
If "karma" exists you'll contract leperosy.
Excuse me DictionaryBoy....leprosy.
Way to zero in on important shit.
Not exactly. Rush wasn't even on the air the week Vince Foster
was killed. He was over in Israel if I recall.
He did talk about a report that some news agency had put out
saying that Vince had been killed in an apartment used by Hillary. He
never said that Hillary had murdered him.
> Also, Mr. Clinton doesn't refer to the National Association of Women
> as the NAGS.
What the hell is the National Association of Women?
The NAGS are the National Association of Gals.
> The absolutely couldn't have happened to a more deserving soul.
A true liberal showing his stripes.
--
.. The longer I read about the Government, the more I'm
convinced that there's no problem in the Government that
can't be solved by the sun exploding.
-- Rodney Lee
>Liberals always call Conservatives "hate Mongers " but the past 4 years
>Clinton has lost his hearing too and no ne was making fun of him. Now
>Liberal Scum cant stop making fun of Rush. Now we know who the REAL HATE
>MONGERS ARE !
>
What, we should stop making fun of Rush just because he has lost his hearing?
Rush would not approve of that kind of thinking, my friend.
>Chief Justice Wells <"Read My Dissent "@
>http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/OP-SC00-2431.pdf> wrote in
>news:DMHw7.114626$5A3.34...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com:
>
>> Liberals always call Conservatives "hate Mongers " but the past 4 years
>> Clinton has lost his hearing too and no ne was making fun of him. Now
>> Liberal Scum cant stop making fun of Rush. Now we know who the REAL
>> HATE MONGERS ARE !
>>
>> http://www.buffalo.edu/reporter/vol29/vol29n10/n5.html
>>
>> http://archive.nandotimes.com/newsroom/ntn/health/100797/health1_11524_n
>> oframes.html
>>
>> http://deafness.about.com/library/weekly/aa101397.htm?once=true&
>
> In all fairness (a phrase that will escape the liberals), these are news
>articles and opinion pieces printed in legitimate news vehicles. I just did
>a quick search of the news and didn't find any disparaging writing about
>Rush, either. You can't really compare these articles with the slimy
>vitriol we find on this newsgroup. These are posted by post-pubescent
>idiots with nothing better to do than make fun of people whose intellect
>they will never comprehend, let alone achieve.
>
> On the other hand, I don't recall even hearing about Clinton's hearing
>loss, let alone hearing derisive crap coming from his usual gang of
>detractors on this or any newsgroup. So you have a point.
On his head, and yours too. You never heard about Clinton's hearing loss
because he didn't announce it to the press. Do you think there could be
a correlation between Clinton's hearing loss not being widely known and
its not being discussed on this group? Just MAYBE?
But I think Rush's hearing loss is much more severe. It's obviously
affected his voice now.
does this include yourself? or are all your posts more intelligent than those
of others?
:-]
___________________
I bet if God wore pants He'd wear belt like that...
Here we have it: A post-pubescent
The first thing to fall off would be his dick.....................if
he had one.
At least Marv can post under his own
name, which more than the juvenile hiding
behind "Liberal Klown" can do.
If there was justice, Rush would be afflicted with:
1) The bone disease that he made fun of
Robert Riech for having.
2) The appearance that he made fun of Chelsea
Clinton for having
3) The income he made fun of homeless people
for having.
4) The gender he made fun of "Vagino-Americans"
for having.
> In article <Xns9135A7C292F09...@207.126.101.100>, Jim
> Alder <jima...@ssnet.com> wrote:
>
>>Chief Justice Wells <"Read My Dissent "@
>>http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/OP-SC00-2431.pdf> wrote in
>>news:DMHw7.114626$5A3.34...@news1.rdc2.pa.home.com:
>>
>>> Liberals always call Conservatives "hate Mongers " but the past 4
>>> years Clinton has lost his hearing too and no ne was making fun of
>>> him. Now Liberal Scum cant stop making fun of Rush. Now we know who
>>> the REAL HATE MONGERS ARE !
>>>
>>> http://www.buffalo.edu/reporter/vol29/vol29n10/n5.html
>>>
>>> http://archive.nandotimes.com/newsroom/ntn/health/100797/health1_11524
>>> _n oframes.html
>>>
>>> http://deafness.about.com/library/weekly/aa101397.htm?once=true&
>>
>> In all fairness (a phrase that will escape the liberals), these are
>> news
>>articles and opinion pieces printed in legitimate news vehicles. I just
>>did a quick search of the news and didn't find any disparaging writing
>>about Rush, either. You can't really compare these articles with the
>>slimy vitriol we find on this newsgroup. These are posted by
>>post-pubescent idiots with nothing better to do than make fun of people
>>whose intellect they will never comprehend, let alone achieve.
>>
>> On the other hand, I don't recall even hearing about Clinton's
>> hearing
>>loss, let alone hearing derisive crap coming from his usual gang of
>>detractors on this or any newsgroup. So you have a point.
>
> On his head, and yours too.
Oh, aren't you clever?
> You never heard about Clinton's hearing
> loss because he didn't announce it to the press.
Actually, looking back I found several articles on the subject. Of
course, it's difficult to use a search engine to find them. When you type
in "Clinton" and "hearing," you get oh so many articles unrelated to his
hearing loss.
http://deafness.about.com/library/weekly/aa101397.htm
http://www.buffalo.edu/reporter/vol29/vol29n10/n5.html
> Do you think there
> could be a correlation between Clinton's hearing loss not being widely
> known and its not being discussed on this group? Just MAYBE?
Maybe. I didn't say it wasn't widely known, I said I didn't recall
hearing about it.
> But I think Rush's hearing loss is much more severe. It's obviously
> affected his voice now.
Not obvious, but I noticed a problem with sibilants the other day. And
it could easily get worse. Of course, he does have a multimillion dollar
contract ($250M?), and can afford the best specialists. If he can't cure
the problem, he can have round the clock speech therapists. People who have
been deaf all their lives learn to speak normally, or close to it. Rush has
been speaking nonstop for the last twenty years or so. He just needs to get
used to not hearing his own voice.
> These are posted by post-pubescent
> idiots with nothing better to do than make fun of people whose
> intellect they will never comprehend, let alone achieve. <<<<<<<
>
> does this include yourself? or are all your posts more intelligent
> than those of others?
>:-]
Yep, every one. Wonder why you can't tell?
You translate "making fun of libnerals" into hate? I call it political
satire.
> AL Gore said in the 1996 election campaign , ' republicans are going to kill > more people ". This from a man that made millions selling Tobacco he raised > which killed countless
> people . Of course Al Gore doesnt think his tobacco kills anyone.
Specific examples from Rush? Not any recent ones since I haven't
listened to him for awhile. When I first discovered him around 1995 he
kept saying that you had to listen to him for six months to really
understand what he was saying. I listened for six months and found
that I had pretty well understood him the first day. Unless he has
graphically changed his tune (doubtful) what he was all about was
attacking anything and everything not believed in by staunch
conservatives in order to get good ratings and high pay for Rush.
Perhaps you don't perceive his comments about feminists, ecologists,
the Clintons, Gore, and many others as hate speach. If so, I submit
that your definition of hate is a bit different from most peoples.
I never said, BTW, that other's don't use hate speach as well. One has
only to browse the newsgroups to realized that they do. What I said
was that Rush has made a career out of belittling others. He shouldn't
expect sympathy back from them. It comes with the territory.
New to the intrernet? Anybody can post any name, nic or handle they
wish to use. There's no name verification in the net. There is no
guarantee there is really a Mitchell Holman.
>Liberal Klown <ne_sp...@moi.com> wrote in
>news:osb8stkab40snpj6a...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2001 04:42:12 GMT, "marv throneberry"
>> <ma...@t1962mets.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>that s right...i wake up hating rush s guts praying he d go deaf blind,
>>>have boils, lesions, brain tumors, pancreatic cancer, suffer..and go to
>>>bed seething..but now that he s going down the tubes i feel alot better
>>>thank you.
>>>
>> Here we have it: A post-pubescent
>> idiots with nothing better to do than make fun of people whose
>> intellect they will never comprehend, let alone achieve.
>
> Don't steal material.
Just proving your point.
> If there was justice, Rush would be afflicted with:
>
>1) The bone disease that he made fun of
> Robert Riech for having.
>
>2) The appearance that he made fun of Chelsea
> Clinton for having
So you're saying you wish Rush looked better? Me too!
LOL DictionaryBoy...what is "leprocy"?