Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Fuck This. Lets Divide the Country in Half.
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2013, 8:10:09 PM5/22/13
to
Conservatives get one half. Liberals get the other. The conservative side
would flourish like no nation in the history of man, while the liberal side
would rot into decay, poverty, crime and ruin. Then we'd have to build a
great wall and man it with machine guns to keep the corrupt starving
liberals out and once they all died off we could take back over the whole
country. Just think. They'd get all the criminals, miscreants and cretins,
while we'd get the cream of the crop yearning to be free. Leave them to
their own devices and let them destroy themselves. Fuck 'em.
-Eddie Haskell
would flourish like no nation in the history of man, while the liberal side
would rot into decay, poverty, crime and ruin. Then we'd have to build a
great wall and man it with machine guns to keep the corrupt starving
liberals out and once they all died off we could take back over the whole
country. Just think. They'd get all the criminals, miscreants and cretins,
while we'd get the cream of the crop yearning to be free. Leave them to
their own devices and let them destroy themselves. Fuck 'em.
-Eddie Haskell
Hell Stomper
May 22, 2013, 8:43:52 PM5/22/13
to
Brown are turning their states into commie hellholes and losing so
much business that they have to advertize for business on TV!
Works for me. Let 'em crash and burn.
Zepp
May 22, 2013, 8:43:32 PM5/22/13
to
seem to remember someone suggesting the footage of the West, Texas
explosion, and Perry doing a voice-over: "Come to Texas, where business
is booming!"
Hell Stomper
May 22, 2013, 8:49:37 PM5/22/13
to
MattB .
May 22, 2013, 8:58:05 PM5/22/13
to
What was the cause of the explosion?
Hell Stomper
May 22, 2013, 9:03:01 PM5/22/13
to
BIG BIRD
May 22, 2013, 9:16:10 PM5/22/13
to
"Hell Stomper" <stardu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:03df1297-c393-486d...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
LMAO
BIG BIRD
May 22, 2013, 9:16:48 PM5/22/13
to
news:f35faef0-d010-42b0...@s18g2000yqg.googlegroups.com...
suck that stinkin rich dick boy, suck it good
BIG BIRD
May 22, 2013, 9:17:26 PM5/22/13
to
"MattB ." <trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote in message
news:2bqqp8da43e560pr5...@4ax.com...
dumb ass rednecks who were suckin angry,old,rich white dick instead of doing their
jobs
MattB .
May 22, 2013, 9:19:13 PM5/22/13
to
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2013, 9:49:18 PM5/22/13
to
news:03df1297-c393-486d...@a8g2000yqp.googlegroups.com...
Damn good point, but I want out from under those third world corrupt stupid
fucks completely. Two of the chief architects of the financial crisis, Fwank
and Cuomo won governor and was reelected to the senate by the idiots of the
NE. How damn stupid can you possibly get? And then that corrupt fuckhead
wiener is running now and watch the smuck win. Get the stupid fucks out of
my country.
Oh and then look at the left coast. The most best ports to the entire
country awash in easy wealth and they are still bankrupting the fuck out of
the state. IDIOTS.
-Eddie Haskell
fucks completely. Two of the chief architects of the financial crisis, Fwank
and Cuomo won governor and was reelected to the senate by the idiots of the
NE. How damn stupid can you possibly get? And then that corrupt fuckhead
wiener is running now and watch the smuck win. Get the stupid fucks out of
my country.
Oh and then look at the left coast. The most best ports to the entire
country awash in easy wealth and they are still bankrupting the fuck out of
the state. IDIOTS.
-Eddie Haskell
Zepp
May 22, 2013, 9:45:48 PM5/22/13
to
>>
>>His boyfriend jizzing in his mouth.
Looks like Steve is projecting again.
>>His boyfriend jizzing in his mouth.
>
>
> Gary's there?
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2013, 9:52:20 PM5/22/13
to
"BIG BIRD" <Sno...@Teranews.com> wrote in message
news:46ent.8639$kj3....@newsfe16.iad...
knees and be grateful while you're pickin' that fuckin' DNC cotton like a
shameless pile of shit slave.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2013, 9:57:37 PM5/22/13
to
"BIG BIRD" <Sno...@Teranews.com> wrote in message
deliberately destroying the country. You know, that place you live, you
stupid motherfucker? You have no fucking idea the hatred your nigger-n-chief
is fostering destroying mankind's greatest achievement. Fuck your nigger.
-Eddie Haskell
Eddie Haskell
May 22, 2013, 10:01:05 PM5/22/13
to
"BIG BIRD" <Sno...@Teranews.com> wrote in message
come here to get. Fuck your nigger. Obama the nigger saw the world's
greatest achievement known as the united states and said, well, no nigger
can do that, so we must destroy it.
FUCK your nigger.
-Eddie Haskell
Hell Stomper
May 23, 2013, 1:34:19 AM5/23/13
to
On May 22, 9:16 pm, "BIG BIRD" <Sno...@Teranews.com> wrote:
> "Hell Stomper" <stardusth...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Die slow and painfully, traitor.
> "Hell Stomper" <stardusth...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Hell Stomper
May 23, 2013, 1:35:14 AM5/23/13
to
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 1:51:41 AM5/23/13
to
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 7:18:56 AM5/23/13
to
factories?
Lee
May 23, 2013, 10:52:19 AM5/23/13
to
Eddie Haskell wrote:
> Conservatives get one half. Liberals get the other.
Just like you did in 1861. How did that
> Conservatives get one half. Liberals get the other.
work out for you "biblical family values"
(read - slavery) conservatives?
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 11:18:16 AM5/23/13
to
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 12:55:59 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>> factories?
>>
>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>
>>>
> It wasn't the issue
>
> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
> little)
>
> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>
> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
risk in the event of fire.
So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
firemen would be alive today.
Unfortuantely, the government of Texas is incapable of wiping it's own
ass, so the situation is what it is. And their sad little apologists
blink in disbelief and tell us they have NO IDEA what caused the
explosion.
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>> factories?
>>
>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>
>>>
>
> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
> little)
>
> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>
> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
risk in the event of fire.
So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
firemen would be alive today.
Unfortuantely, the government of Texas is incapable of wiping it's own
ass, so the situation is what it is. And their sad little apologists
blink in disbelief and tell us they have NO IDEA what caused the
explosion.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 3:03:59 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>> factories?
>>
>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>
>
explosion?" You place blame so should be able to answer that
question.
What cause the explosion?
We need to know that to prevent it happening again.
Also we need to know the cause to know if in fact we need new
regulation of they weren't followed or was it a accident.
Anyone can blame and yet to be believed you need some facts. Rhetoric
is for the stupid.
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>> factories?
>>
>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>
>
>It wasn't the issue
>
>The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>"Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>little)
>
>It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>
>Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>ideal.
No that isn't the issue here. I asked this "What was the cause of the
>
>The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>"Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>little)
>
>It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>
>Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>ideal.
explosion?" You place blame so should be able to answer that
question.
What cause the explosion?
We need to know that to prevent it happening again.
Also we need to know the cause to know if in fact we need new
regulation of they weren't followed or was it a accident.
Anyone can blame and yet to be believed you need some facts. Rhetoric
is for the stupid.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 3:11:29 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>>> factories?
>>>
>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>
>>>>
>> It wasn't the issue
>>
>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>> little)
>>
>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>
>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
>> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
>
>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>risk in the event of fire.
Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>>> factories?
>>>
>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>
>>>>
>> It wasn't the issue
>>
>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>> little)
>>
>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>
>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
>> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
>
>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>risk in the event of fire.
Cite please.
I do agree that the firemen should have been trained better. Then
again I believe that about our police also. I live in a liberal State
and they could use better training also.
I also think it was totally stupid to build housing that close to the
factory.
>
>So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
>firemen would be alive today.
>
>Unfortuantely, the government of Texas is incapable of wiping it's own
>ass, so the situation is what it is. And their sad little apologists
>blink in disbelief and tell us they have NO IDEA what caused the
>explosion.
a conspiracy.
Even I don't think that of him.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 4:03:13 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:07:08 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 04:18:56 -0700, MattB .
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 04:18:56 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What was the cause of the explosion?
>>>
>>>270 tons of ammonium nitrate.
>>
>>In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>factories?
>
>You stupid halfwit
>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What was the cause of the explosion?
>>>
>>>270 tons of ammonium nitrate.
>>
>>In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>factories?
>
>
>The issue isn't "fertilizer"
>
>It's REGULATION of an industry (any, in fact) that allowed to go
>unchecked, caused this massive disaster
>
>How in fuck do you have the intellectual ability to get up each day
>and be so stupid----is that deliberate?
What regulations were followed and what not.
What caused the explosion?
What caused the original fire?
What regulations would you have added?
Please show us your intelligence or lack of it here please
I'm betting you will answer with Rhetoric or un provable info.
That is what Zepp does.
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 4:52:40 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:11:29 -0700, MattB . wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all
>>>>> fertilizer factories?
>>>>
>>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>
>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>> little)
>>>
>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>
>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>>> by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>>> ideal.
>>
>>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>>risk in the event of fire.
>
> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>
> Cite please.
Too stupid to use Google, are you? www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all
>>>>> fertilizer factories?
>>>>
>>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>
>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>> little)
>>>
>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>
>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>>> by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>>> ideal.
>>
>>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>>risk in the event of fire.
>
> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>
> Cite please.
>
> I do agree that the firemen should have been trained better. Then again
> I believe that about our police also. I live in a liberal State and
> they could use better training also.
They were volunteers. In other words, none of the Texas cheapskates
> I do agree that the firemen should have been trained better. Then again
> I believe that about our police also. I live in a liberal State and
> they could use better training also.
wanted to shell out any money for them.
Well, hell, this is Texas. Cheaper to bury 'em than it is to train 'em.
>
> I also think it was totally stupid to build housing that close to the
> factory.
Someone made a lot of money off that decision.
> I also think it was totally stupid to build housing that close to the
> factory.
>
>
>>So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
>>firemen would be alive today.
>
> In you opinion.
>
And the opinion of just about everyone else.
>
>>So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
>>firemen would be alive today.
>
> In you opinion.
>
Gronk
May 23, 2013, 6:14:38 PM5/23/13
to
MattB . wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>>>> factories?
>>>>
>>>> No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>
>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>> little)
>>>
>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>
>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
>>> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
>>
>> Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>> far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>> risk in the event of fire.
>
> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>
> Cite please.
Look up worker safety in Texas...
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all fertilizer
>>>>> factories?
>>>>
>>>> No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>
>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>> little)
>>>
>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>
>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded by
>>> years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was ideal.
>>
>> Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>> far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>> risk in the event of fire.
>
> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>
> Cite please.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 6:23:09 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:52:40 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:11:29 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all
>>>>>> fertilizer factories?
>>>>>
>>>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>>
>>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>>> little)
>>>>
>>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>>
>>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>>>> by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>>>> ideal.
>>>
>>>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>>>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>>>risk in the event of fire.
>>
>> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>>
>> Cite please.
>
>Too stupid to use Google, are you? www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf?
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 12:11:29 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:55:59 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 10:11:02 -0600, Yoorghis wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:18:16 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> In a fertilizer factory? Imagine that you want to ban all
>>>>>> fertilizer factories?
>>>>>
>>>>>No, just enforce the federal limit of 400 pounds per site.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> It wasn't the issue
>>>>
>>>> The issue is a universal demand by conservative/republicans to enforce
>>>> "Smaller government", which translates into NO REGULATION (or very
>>>> little)
>>>>
>>>> It transcends the specifics (Fertilizer)---and encompasses food,
>>>> products, labor practices, Health care, medicine.
>>>>
>>>> Conservatives hate regulation. It was (what) over a decade since any
>>>> inspection of that site happened, and the regulations had been eroded
>>>> by years of republican belief that "less regulation" (less govt) was
>>>> ideal.
>>>
>>>Well, had the federal law been enforced, the explosion would have been
>>>far smaller, and the volunteer firemen would have been made aware of the
>>>risk in the event of fire.
>>
>> Do you know what regulations weren't followed?
>>
>> Cite please.
>
File Not Found
>>
>> I do agree that the firemen should have been trained better. Then again
>> I believe that about our police also. I live in a liberal State and
>> they could use better training also.
>
>They were volunteers. In other words, none of the Texas cheapskates
>wanted to shell out any money for them.
aren't?
>
>Well, hell, this is Texas. Cheaper to bury 'em than it is to train 'em.
>>
>> I also think it was totally stupid to build housing that close to the
>> factory.
>
>Someone made a lot of money off that decision.
another half mile away.
>>
>>
>>>So half a community would still be standing, and fourteen volunteer
>>>firemen would be alive today.
>>
>> In you opinion.
>>
>And the opinion of just about everyone else.
>>
>>>Unfortuantely, the government of Texas is incapable of wiping it's own
>>>ass, so the situation is what it is. And their sad little apologists
>>>blink in disbelief and tell us they have NO IDEA what caused the
>>>explosion.
>>
>> Isn't Obama also looking into it? OSHA? You saying Obama is part of a
>> conspiracy.
>>
>> Even I don't think that of him.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 6:24:42 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:14:38 -0600, Gronk <inv...@usenetlove.invalid>
wrote:
No you claim the cause is conservatives. then prove it.
Guess you'd need to know the cause first.
Rhetoric the tool of the incompetent.
wrote:
Guess you'd need to know the cause first.
Rhetoric the tool of the incompetent.
Gronk
May 23, 2013, 6:28:04 PM5/23/13
to
safety in Texas.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 6:31:42 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:28:04 -0600, Gronk <inv...@usenetlove.invalid>
I think I'd disagree with it in many States. Fact is the cause could
be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
We just don't know enough to blame anyone. Then again liberals on
hear are.
I do think we need find the cause and them try to make sure it doesn't
happen again,
Let OSHA do it's job.
be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
We just don't know enough to blame anyone. Then again liberals on
hear are.
I do think we need find the cause and them try to make sure it doesn't
happen again,
Let OSHA do it's job.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 6:49:47 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:00 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:03:13 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>You stupid halfwit
>>>
>>>The issue isn't "fertilizer"
>>>
>>>It's REGULATION of an industry (any, in fact) that allowed to go
>>>unchecked, caused this massive disaster
>>>
>>>How in fuck do you have the intellectual ability to get up each day
>>>and be so stupid----is that deliberate?
>>
>>
>>What regulations were followed and what not.
>
>You don't get it, do you?
>
>>What caused the explosion?
>
>You don't get it, do you?
>were NOT carried out on a dangerous industry
>
>If consistent, frequent, inspections and regulatory oversight of a
>dangerous industry were carried out.....LIKE THEY SHOULD----we
>wouldn't have dumb assholes like you asking stupid questions
>
>There should never have been questions to "ask"....After-the-fact
>resulting in a massive explosion and death
>
>The reason for the disaster was NO oversight, NO inspection, NOTHING
>done to catch problems BEFORE they happened.
>
>Are you so devoid of any intellect that you think you can run a train
>on a rail line without ever inspecting them?
>
>Hmmm?
So Obama's OSHA failed?
I get it.
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 13:03:13 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>You stupid halfwit
>>>
>>>The issue isn't "fertilizer"
>>>
>>>It's REGULATION of an industry (any, in fact) that allowed to go
>>>unchecked, caused this massive disaster
>>>
>>>How in fuck do you have the intellectual ability to get up each day
>>>and be so stupid----is that deliberate?
>>
>>
>>What regulations were followed and what not.
>
>
>>What caused the explosion?
>
>You don't get it, do you?
>
>>What caused the original fire?
>
>You don't get it, do you?
>>What caused the original fire?
>
>
>>What regulations would you have added?
>
>You don't get it, do you?
>>What regulations would you have added?
>
>
>>Please show us your intelligence or lack of it here please
>
>Those ignorant questions don't accept the FACT that the inspections
>>Please show us your intelligence or lack of it here please
>
>were NOT carried out on a dangerous industry
>
>If consistent, frequent, inspections and regulatory oversight of a
>dangerous industry were carried out.....LIKE THEY SHOULD----we
>wouldn't have dumb assholes like you asking stupid questions
>
>There should never have been questions to "ask"....After-the-fact
>resulting in a massive explosion and death
>
>The reason for the disaster was NO oversight, NO inspection, NOTHING
>done to catch problems BEFORE they happened.
>
>Are you so devoid of any intellect that you think you can run a train
>on a rail line without ever inspecting them?
>
>Hmmm?
So Obama's OSHA failed?
I get it.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 7:03:43 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>> File Not Found
>
>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
I found it this is what came through on Agent
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf
Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
Obama you scream.
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>> File Not Found
>
>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
I found it this is what came through on Agent
www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf
Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
Obama you scream.
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 9:01:21 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> File Not Found
>>
>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>
>
> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>
> www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf‎
> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> File Not Found
>>
>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>
>
> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>
>
> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>
> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>
> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
> Obama you scream.
Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>
> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>
> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
> Obama you scream.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 9:56:05 PM5/23/13
to
On Fri, 24 May 2013 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> File Not Found
>>>
>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>
>>
>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>
>> www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdfâ??
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>> File Not Found
>>>
>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>
>>
>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>
>>
>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>
>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>
>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>> Obama you scream.
>
>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
There are many chemicals that can be explosive.
>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>
>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>
>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>> Obama you scream.
>
>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
Tell me what does your question have to do with blame and liberal
accusations?
Yes I know what it is. There are several bags that contain it in the
shed.
Message has been deleted
Zepp
May 23, 2013, 10:46:23 PM5/23/13
to
dangerous substance?
You're really starting to sound like a fool here.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 11:02:42 PM5/23/13
to
On Thu, 23 May 2013 20:38:36 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:56:05 -0700, MattB .
>instittuions which track, inspect, and regulate dangerous
>institutions, plants, or ALL kinds
>
>REpublican have systematically Gutted the agencies that deal with
>inspections---because "less government" is good according to
>conservatives
>
>Deal with the ISSUE
>
>It is not "fertilizer", or "bags", or types of anything
>
>It is the REGULATON of industries that can harm or kill us
>
>It blew up for an undefined set of reasons----but because NO
>INSPECTIONS had taken place for years and years---it was left to their
>own devices----which isi profit---not safety.
>
>IDIOT
How can you know why it blew? Did you cause it? If not you don't
know.
Again you just make things up as you go. Obama has been in power how
many years guess he is at fault.
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:56:05 -0700, MattB .
><trdel...@spamnogmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> File Not Found
>>>>>
>>>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>>>
>>>> www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdfâ??
>>>>
>>>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>>>
>>>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>>>
>>>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>>>> Obama you scream.
>>>
>>>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
>>
>>There are many chemicals that can be explosive.
>
>That's not the issue (again, because you're so dense)
>
>>On Fri, 24 May 2013 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB . <trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> File Not Found
>>>>>
>>>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>>>
>>>> www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdfâ??
>>>>
>>>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>>>
>>>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>>>
>>>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>>>> Obama you scream.
>>>
>>>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
>>
>>There are many chemicals that can be explosive.
>
>
>>Tell me what does your question have to do with blame and liberal
>>accusations?
>
>The issue is-----The long trend of DEREGULATION and defunding
>>Tell me what does your question have to do with blame and liberal
>>accusations?
>
>instittuions which track, inspect, and regulate dangerous
>institutions, plants, or ALL kinds
>
>REpublican have systematically Gutted the agencies that deal with
>inspections---because "less government" is good according to
>conservatives
>
>Deal with the ISSUE
>
>It is not "fertilizer", or "bags", or types of anything
>
>It is the REGULATON of industries that can harm or kill us
>
>It blew up for an undefined set of reasons----but because NO
>INSPECTIONS had taken place for years and years---it was left to their
>own devices----which isi profit---not safety.
>
>IDIOT
How can you know why it blew? Did you cause it? If not you don't
know.
Again you just make things up as you go. Obama has been in power how
many years guess he is at fault.
MattB .
May 23, 2013, 11:09:06 PM5/23/13
to
On Fri, 24 May 2013 02:46:23 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:56:05 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB .
>>>>><trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> File Not Found
>>>>>
>>>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>>>
>>>> www.fas.org/sgp/crs/homesec/R43070.pdf�??
>On Thu, 23 May 2013 18:56:05 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 24 May 2013 01:01:21 +0000 (UTC), Zepp <de...@gone.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:03:43 -0700, MattB . wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 23 May 2013 16:48:42 -0600, Yoor...@Jurgis.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 23 May 2013 15:23:09 -0700, MattB .
>>>>><trdel...@spamnogmail.com>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> File Not Found
>>>>>
>>>>>You dumb twat---you can't find your own ass.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I found it this is what came through on Agent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>>>
>>>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>>>
>>>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>>>> Obama you scream.
>>>
>>>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
>>
>> There are many chemicals that can be explosive.
>>
>> Tell me what does your question have to do with blame and liberal
>> accusations?
>
>Are you trying to claim that ammonium nitrate isn't an extremely
>dangerous substance?
Yes and you are distracting from the point. You don't know the cause
>>>> Now that said this report doesn't list the cause of the explosion.
>>>>
>>>> Without knowing the cause all this political BS is just that BS.
>>>>
>>>> So you place blame and with limited information. when that is done to
>>>> Obama you scream.
>>>
>>>Do you even know what ammonium nitrate is?
>>
>> There are many chemicals that can be explosive.
>>
>> Tell me what does your question have to do with blame and liberal
>> accusations?
>
>Are you trying to claim that ammonium nitrate isn't an extremely
>dangerous substance?
and have no idea what is to blame.
>
>You're really starting to sound like a fool here.
No you are. You have no facts to backup your allegations. Why don't
>You're really starting to sound like a fool here.
you liberal fools just wait for the facts.
They have suggested ways to improve safety so are off to a good start
and I can hope other plants are reviewing safety.
I can assure you a plant fire is not profitable for any business.
My business is dangerous and no government regulations will make it
any safer.
Gronk
May 28, 2013, 5:04:08 PM5/28/13
to
> be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
MattB .
May 28, 2013, 5:29:07 PM5/28/13
to
On Tue, 28 May 2013 15:04:08 -0600, Gronk <inv...@usenetlove.invalid>
Maybe I disagree with lack of safety rules or maybe to many in some
fields. Face it you can't generalize them all into good or bad.
Not smoking around explosives is a no-brainer.
no-brainer even to a liberal. Then again home invasion is a right to
a liberal.
BTW what was tha cause again?
fields. Face it you can't generalize them all into good or bad.
Not smoking around explosives is a no-brainer.
>
>> be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
>
>Which would be poor worker safety.
True and yet not smoking around explosive materials should be a
>> be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
>
>Which would be poor worker safety.
no-brainer even to a liberal. Then again home invasion is a right to
a liberal.
BTW what was tha cause again?
Gronk
Jun 3, 2013, 12:03:15 PM6/3/13
to
>>> be many reasons maybe someone smoking where they weren't suppose to.
>>
>> Which would be poor worker safety.
>
> True and yet not smoking around explosive materials should be a
> no-brainer even to a liberal. Then again home invasion is a right to
> a liberal.
>
> BTW what was tha cause again?
0 new messages