By Matt Kelley Associated Press Writer
Published: Sep 20, 2002
WASHINGTON (AP) - The Pentagon can't keep track of hundreds of millions of
dollars worth of weapons and emergency aid given to friendly countries,
congressional investigators found.
The Defense Department agency that's supposed to track the donations
reported about $300 million worth of transfers since 1993, while records
from the four military services showed close to $725 million worth, the
General Accounting Office said in a report released Friday.
The Pentagon agreed it needs to create a record-keeping system for an
accurate accounting of the donations to other countries, known as drawdowns.
Federal law allows a president to order the military or other federal
agencies to give equipment, training or other support to friendly countries
to deal with emergencies, fight narcotics trafficking or meet other needs.
Drawdowns offer the president a quick way to help allies without getting
congressional approval, and the use of that authority has expanded
dramatically in the past decade.
[snip]
http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAA43JLC6D.html
-----------------------------------------------------
Newspaper Says U.S. Ignored Terror Warning
Sat Sep 7, 1:29 PM ET
LONDON (Reuters) - The United States ignored a clear warning in July (2001)
last year from the emissary of a Taliban leader that Osama bin Laden's al
Qaeda network was planning a major attack on U.S. soil, the Independent
newspaper said on Saturday.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=578&ncid=578&e=3&u=/nm/2002
0907/ts_nm/attack_warning_dc
--
Fair Use Notice:
This material is made available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and
social justice issues, etc. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such
copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
Well, that would be as stupid as the leftists that wan to control the
weather. (Sun)
John
Incoherent and irrelevant as usual.
> Incoherent and irrelevant as usual.
Pot kettle.
The green house gas global warming folks would have to take control of the
sun to do what they say they want to do; except for the redistribution.
Do you want a soldier in the fied to fill out a form for how many rounds
he/she expended? What you are posting is gibberish.
John
Can your lies get any more baldfaced?
>
> Do you want a soldier in the fied to fill out a form for how many rounds
> he/she expended? What you are posting is gibberish.
Are you such a complete simpleton that you think that this is about the
rounds a soldier shoots? $725 million isn't a few rounds of bullets.
What is evident is that you're using your simplistic logic in an attempt to
confuse and deceive yourself and our readers.
As I said, incoherent and irrelevant.
<snip>
> As I said, incoherent and irrelevant.
The same thing you write in every one of your posts.
John
You're partially correct for a change. I write that you're incoherent and
irrelevant in many of my posts because of your simplistic and deceptive
rebuts.
--
The major reason why corporate crime gets little attention from
reporters, academics and government officials has little to do
with complexity, and more to do with the simple reality of corporate
power. Big corporations have marinated our formerly independent
institutions in corporate cash and influence.
Corporate Predators
Mokhiber & Weissman
>
>
> You're partially correct for a change.
I am completely correct.
John
Only in your solar system of two suns and three moons.
Ohhhh, the incompetency of the Pentegon, beleive it or not, at least
10 years ago, quartermasters actually did that, how many rounds of
ammunition were issued, and soldiers had to requistion ordinance in
triplicate. Granted the rules and regulations get losened when you
are actually in combat, but the fact is they are metering out supplies
to troops, while at the same time, 10,000 of tons of ordinance are
becoming unstable and need to be destroyed(at additional costs) in
goverment store houses.
Absolutly amazing what the Pentagon loses, and HOW much of it they
lose.
Yeah, we put little blue stickers on every thing on the property list all
over eddies. The poblem was the hundreds of thousands of dollars in parts
and equipment that had to be trash canned because they had no blue
stickers..
> Absolutly amazing what the Pentagon loses, and HOW much of it they
> lose.
And we want other militarys to account for what?
John
What is most comical is that people seem to just change the subject when
they have little knowlege or background on the topic at hand.
Stiner
> Do you want a soldier in the fied to fill out a form for how many rounds
> he/she expended? What you are posting is gibberish.
>
> John
Sure. If it will keep them from shooting everything that moves.
Stiner