LaRouche Launches Youth Movement To Rebuild America -- ( Muriel Mirak-Weissbach )
-
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2935conf_intro.html
This article appears in the Sept. 13, 2002 issue of
Executive Intelligence Review.
See also: LaRouche Conference Keynote
LaRouche Launches Youth Movement To Rebuild America
by Muriel Mirak-Weissbach
A revolution has begun inside the United States, led by a rare
collection of young people, who, having grasped the nature of the
historical period we are living in, have decided to dedicate their
lives to ensuring that the world will not descend into a New Dark Age,
but rather initiate a new Renaissance. These young Americans-political
"canaries in the mine"-have been joining Lyndon LaRouche's campaign in
increasing numbers as the collapse has come on during 2002.
LaRouche gathered the leadership of this new international youth
movement, at the semi-annual conference of the International Caucus of
Labor Committees and Schiller Institute on "The Global Financial Crash
of 2002," attended by 1,000, in Reston, Virginia over the Labor Day
weekend. On this weekend which traditionally looks forward to November
election days, LaRouche's keynote speech also detailed an "emergency
November program" to rebuild the transport and economic infrastructure
of the United States, which is collapsing in bankruptcy shutdowns. He
is "presenting the President and the incoming Congress with the
emergency program they must immediately adopt" to stop the
disintegration of the U.S. economy; and the youth movement is
mobilized with this idea.
Generation With 'No Future'
LaRouche is a world-historic individual in this crisis, as Franklin
Delano Roosevelt-whom he cited as a model in his keynote-was such a
personality who revived the nation from the last Depression. In giving
the youth now joining him, greater freedom and responsibility in his
movement, he stressed that the key to acquiring the courage required
to lead in a time of crisis, is the sense of personal identity, based
on the knowledge that, although life is mortal, one achieves
immortality, through doing something "which was needed, in honor of
past mankind, and for the sake of the future of mankind."
Over the course of the past generation, the "Baby Boomer" generation
of those born after World War II, everything that had been achieved by
Roosevelt has been destroyed. The shift from producer to "consumer
society," the rock-drug-sex counterculture, and the fixation on
"personal needs," as opposed to the the general welfare on which FDR
based his Presidency, has made the U.S. economy a global looting
machine, now thoroughly breaking down. It has produced a youth whose
self-conception is "the no-future generation," to whom no future
mission is offered in school, economy, or society. They respond now to
LaRouche's message that they have to make their own future by a
mission to rebuild America and the world.
Cultural pessimism is pervasive among this generation; they have no
sense of truth or mission. Many college-age youth do not even wear
watches, as they have no sense of time. The "counterculture" which
their parents adopted from the 1960s, and have made the dominant
culture of present-day America, has eliminated Classical culture,
robbing youth of a sense of history, of science and technological
progress.
Their advantage, however, as West Coast LaRouche movement leader
Philip Rubinstein pointed out, is that by 1998-99, they knew they had
"no future." Whereas their Baby Boomer parents still nurture illusions
that they can somehow survive in the stock and real estate markets and
have enough money to retire-"or at least to pay for their funeral"-the
generation of 18- to 25-year-olds realize the system is gone, and that
their education is a fraud, preparing them for nothing they actually
face.
When confronted with the moral and intellectual challenge represented
by LaRouche, and by his uncanny ability to forecast economic and
political developments, they respond with shock and intrigue, and a
desire to learn how he was able to do so. For example, LaRouche's
warning on Nov. 3, 2000, that the Presidential elections would not be
decided on Election Day; and his January 2000 published insistence
that the omnipotent Enron, then ripping up California, had to
collapse; proved to many youth that LaRouche uniquely "knows what he
is talking about."
Some 25-30 of the youth movement's organizers told the story from
their own vantage point during the Sept. 1 evening plenary. A young
man from Los Angeles who has been organizing for LaRouche since late
2001, recalled his first contact with LaRouche, as "phenomenal,
unbelievable," but that he then thought: "If what he is saying is
true, what does that require of me?" A college girl whose father had
told her that life was without purpose, related her awareness during
her first attendance at a Schiller Institute cadre school, that it was
a "profound moment.... Finally I found people who would discuss
philosophy, who were doing something." Others emphasized their sense
of the enormous responsibility they had taken on, by joining
LaRouche's movement at such a time of breakdown crisis.
Several said they had thought at first, that it would be "easy" to
recruit their friends and contemporaries to the movement, but soon
found otherwise. A student leader from California reported his
confrontation with other students during a demonstration, who were
deriding the speakers with the deep pessimism common to so many
students, saying, "The fool is the one who thinks he can do something
to change the world." But this leader emphasized to the conference,
"Think big. Maybe I'll be called upon to go to Congo-Zaire, or to
Brazil, to help implement LaRouche's policies. That's what this youth
movement is for: to implement the new monetary system, and avoid a
Dark Age." Its national purpose, of course: To put LaRouche in the
White House in 2004.
------------------------------------------------------------------o
John
news:3d80dac4....@news.cis.dfn.de...
>
> http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2935conf_intro.html
>
>
> This article appears in the Sept. 13, 2002 issue of
> Executive Intelligence Review.
> See also: LaRouche Conference Keynote
You never did answer my previous question. Are you on the payroll... or
just another LaRouche cultist?
BTW... whatever happened to his "Fusion Energy Foundation"? :)
John
John
-
>>
>>
>> This article appears in the Sept. 13, 2002 issue of
>> Executive Intelligence Review.
>> See also: LaRouche Conference Keynote
"John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> You never did answer my previous question. Are you on the payroll...
> or just another LaRouche cultist?
You could be more patient, waiting for cross-traffic. No, I am not
on a LaRouche payroll, and I had voted GreenParty in "Erection 2000."
> BTW... whatever happened to his "Fusion Energy Foundation"? :)
I have a few links via PopularMechanics ...
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2000/1/americans_predict_future/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2000/10/nuclear_fusion_use/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1998/9/global_warming_wildcard/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2000/12/PBS_Life_Tesla/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2002/8/new_atom_smashers/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2000/8/intelligence_electronics/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1998/5/sizzing_supercomputers/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1998/6/nuclear_waste_works/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1997/12/antigravity_machine/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1999/1/yucca_mountain/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2000/9/visualizing_airflow/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/1997/10/schroedingers_cat/
http://popularmechanics.com/science/research/2002/8/fusion_redux/
From: Journal of HomeLand Security ( Established October 2000 )
A Defensive Strategy to Defeat Bioterrorism Attacks by Weaponized
Bacterial and Viral Pathogens
http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Articles/displayarticle.asp?article=68
Cybercare
http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Articles/displayarticle.asp?article=69
Envisioning a Truly Transformational Homeland Security Strategy
http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Articles/displayarticle.asp?article=71
Combating Terrorism: With a Helmet or a Badge?
http://www.homelandsecurity.org/journal/Articles/displayarticle.asp?article=72
A Decade of Deception and Defiance
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912.html
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/09/20020912-1.html
- regards
- jb
.
John
>
> > "-" <jum...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
> >>
> >> http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2935conf_intro.html
> >>
> >>
> >> This article appears in the Sept. 13, 2002 issue of
> >> Executive Intelligence Review.
> >> See also: LaRouche Conference Keynote
>
> "John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > You never did answer my previous question. Are you on the payroll...
> > or just another LaRouche cultist?
Glad to hear it.
>
>
> You could be more patient, waiting for cross-traffic. No, I am not
> on a LaRouche payroll, and I had voted GreenParty in "Erection 2000."
Glad to hear that too. I assume then you posted his Neo-Nazi EIRN site (and
previous article) because you were unaware of the original source and who
Lyndon LaRouche really is.
If so, my apologies for assuming too much.
John
George Grapman
Remember this is the man who says that Kissinger and the Queen of
England are the worlds two biggest drug dealers.
--
To reply via e-mail please delete "NOSPAM" from address.
-
"John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> I assume then you posted his Neo-Nazi EIRN site (and previous article)
> because you were unaware of the original source and who
> Lyndon LaRouche really is.
>
> If so, my apologies for assuming too much.
You are apologizing in advance for assuming too much, should
the status of your assumption, from the paragraph, indeed be the case?
> Here's the REAL Lyndon LaRouche (a fascist and fraud):
>
> http://www.protest.net/view.cgi?view=2312
I hadn't seen this particular webpage before, however it appears
to echo some materials I had reviewed several years earlier. I don't
regard the "jail-time" accounts as invalidating someone's candidacy.
Either one has paid dues or not. If the dues have not been paid then
the prisoner should not be released. Not only is there an "innocent
before proven guilty" there is also "restoration of (social) status"
once the penal system has extracted its due vengeance and pound
of flesh. For similar reasons I do not favor denying voter rights to
ex-felons of Florida who might have cast ballots for -any- candidate.
Rather than debate the merits and demerits of LaRouche, I have
written to Anthony Chaitkin with a suggestion that they offer some
articles addressing the Chip Berlet analysis, particularly in context
to the factor of LaRouche's 2004 Presidential Bid, where candidates
are provided not only a forum but also an opportunity for remarks.
Hope that helps.
John
No... it really doesn't help much. Anyone that would take LaRouche
seriously is either a BS artist, or brain dead.
John
Kurt
Don't tell me you're being taken in by this man JB. He's a neo-fascist and
used to run 'summer camps' for children in northern Virginia that amounted
to fascist indoctrination camps. Given the politics you generarlly display
in your posts, I must say that I'm disappointed...
Kurt
"George Grapman" <sfge...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:3D80F622...@NOSPAMpacbell.net...
> Watch for those extra zeroes they put on your credit card bill.
> Remember this is the man who says that Kissinger and the Queen of
> England are the worlds two biggest drug dealers.
>
> --
Well, at least Kissinger is...
Kurt
the anti-war rally in NYC this morning. They were overly aggressive, rude
and displayed no capacity to reason on their own. It truly is cultism.
George Grapman
never work alone? Can't risk having them go one on one with anyone who
thinks for themselves.
Kurt
utterly shocked. They ganged up on people not letting you get a word in
edgewise. If one or two were unsuccessful in engaging you, you'd then be
approached by more within a matter of minutes. Then they would occasionally
congregate in a group to discuss what was going on. It was rather funny - at
one point I happened to walk by one of the groups and this woman who
couldn't have been more than 20 was saying to the others 'you wouldn't
belief what awful things these people are saying to me [about LaRouche]
they're calling him a fascist...'
Though they were far to young to be suvivors of his indoctrination camps in
the eighties, it appeared that they certainly had been brainwashed. It's sad
to see the vulnerable preyed upon by such a dangerous and deceitful man [but
then again we have one of those for president, don't we...]
One older guy who apporached me and launched into a rant when I refused to
take his literature. I told him politely that I knew quite a bit LaRouche
and I wasn't interested. He then tried to bully me into telling him why I
didn't like LaRouche [bringing up 'talking points']. After being annoyed for
about a minute by being talked at, I politely said that I had come to see
the anti-war speakers and was not interested in having a discussion with him
about why I don't like LaRouche and turned away. He then continued to talk
in my ear about three minutes until he finally gave up. At least the
Jehovah's Witnesses go away when you tell them you're not interested in
discussing your soul with them.
"George Grapman" <sfge...@NOSPAMpacbell.net> wrote in message
news:3D8114DB...@NOSPAMpacbell.net...
Enemy Combatant
sfge...@NOSPAMpacbell.net says...
>
> Watch for those extra zeroes they put on your credit card bill.
> Remember this is the man who says that Kissinger and the Queen of
>England are the worlds two biggest drug dealers.
In fact, he hates everything British. Must be the built in antagonism
and provincialism-Larouche IS a French name, after all.
Dave Simpson
> You never did answer my previous question. Are you on the payroll... or
> just another LaRouche cultist?
He, she, or it certainly is goofy enough to be a cultist.
Dave Simpson
-
>> Rather than debate the merits and demerits of LaRouche, I have
>> written to Anthony Chaitkin with a suggestion that they offer some
>> articles addressing the Chip Berlet analysis, particularly in context
>> to the factor of LaRouche's 2004 Presidential Bid, where candidates
>> are provided not only a forum but also an opportunity for remarks.
>> Hope that helps.
"John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> No... it really doesn't help much. Anyone that would take
> LaRouche seriously is either a BS artist, or brain dead.
Anyone who would apply _ad_hominem_ procedures in the
political context, either arguing "from authority" or "against moron",
is -missing- essential points which locate arguments in the issues.
See if you can discuss the LaRouche website without logical fallacy:
The Logical Fallacies: Table of Contents
http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/toc.htm
In some contexts that could be regarded as a backhanded
compliment, so I'll add two-cents into the pot. I would prefer to
stir-up a response from the LaRouche organization, regarding
these accounts of "fascism", to see whether they can "explain"
themselves. While it is true that the LaRouche people seek to
wrest control from the Democrats, one could -confuse- their lust
for "political power" (common to most movements) with fascism.
I would sooner identify fascism among those forces -already- in
charge rather than among any minority marginalized elements.
So, this is chiefly a case of being considerate to the underdog.
> Oh - and another thing. I was assulted by his thugs [both young and
> old] at the anti-war rally in NYC this morning. They were overly aggressive,
> rude and displayed no capacity to reason on their own. It truly is cultism.
Abbey Hoffman wrote of LaRouche bringing a baseball bat
to some rally for radicals during the 1970s, but I have not found
their political representatives anything but sincere. I suppose
that's due to the fact that I do not tend to argue directly, but keep
asking questions until I can spin them out into some contradictions.
They have an -extensive- literature worth perusal, if only for one's
illumination or enlightenment with political/religous "cult" studies,
rather -essential- for a sociology degree. It also helps to read the
books by Eric Hoffer, in particular _The_True_Believer_ (1951), and
one comparable work by William Sims Bainbridge: _Satan's_Power_.
I don't suppose there are any shortcuts to scholarship, nor do I
presume that "cult avoidance" is entirely possible for any of us.
- regards
- jb
---- P.S. separate "back of the bus" category for the following ----------
> John wrote:
>> You never did answer my previous question.
>> Are you on the payroll... or just another LaRouche cultist?
-( BEGIN MONKEY SPANKER ZOO DEPARTMENT )-
From: david_l...@yahoo.com (Dave Simpson)
> He, she, or it certainly is goofy enough to be a cultist.
Actually, the question was answered, by simple inspection of this
thread, yet one comes to -expect- Simpson's absense of research.
One also expects to find Simpson's uncivil _ad_hominem_ fixations,
since from him there is never any substantiation by way of cites.
-------- begin signature block --------------------------------------
From david.l...@boeing.com (Dave Simpson)
> Go pick your butt and expose yourself as a failure elsewhere, loser.
From: david_l...@yahoo.com (Dave Simpson)
> I just stomp your butt when I tire of you, then ignore you.
From: david_l...@yahoo.com (Dave Simpson)
> Get your head out of your rectum and grow up, loser.
--------- end signature block ----------------------------------------
John
news:23e7f86e.0209...@posting.google.com...
Conspracy theorist seem especially popular these day, especially with the
easily duped far left and far right that hate Bush and Israel... lol.
Remember Lyndon, Dave? :) :
http://www.rickross.com/reference/larouche/larouche6.html
John
Try his 15 year fraud conviction for starters (assuming simple common sense
or his lengthy history won't do it). The guy is a con man and fruitcake and
preys on the young and stupid (and the old and stupid for that matter). Uses
very similar techniques to other cultist groups. Years ago he use to set up
at the airports like the Moonies (re: Fusion Energy Foundation scam).
John
-
"John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Try his 15 year fraud conviction for starters (assuming simple common
> sense or his lengthy history won't do it). The guy is a con man and
> fruitcake and preys on the young and stupid (and the old and stupid
> for that matter). Uses very similar techniques to other cultist groups.
> Years ago he use to set up at the airports like the Moonies
> (re: Fusion Energy Foundation scam).
Do YOU second-guess the courts and juries? LaRouche did NOT
-escape- from prison; he was -released- from prison. Perhaps you had
no concept of the fact that jailers, police lawyers, judges, courts,
etc., are fundamentally -interposed- between lynch mobs (you), and
justice (civil society). I'm thoroughly in -favor- of having evidence
describing the story of conviction with 15-year fraud all laid out.
Having done so, one then needs to "explain" why there are so many
of "the young and stupid" that -YOU- failed to shepherd, that were
products of those public schools paid by YOUR tax dollars. Anybody
who could, at age 80, do what Lyndon LaRouche is still doing,
deserves an even break. When you are age 80 then check back
with us for a "brain overhaul" to see how well -YOU- are doing.
What is one man's meat is another man's poison: what is one
man's "cult" is another man's "culture." Face it: among the basic
questions here concern just "who and what" are trying to vie for
the hearts and minds of citizens. Eventually, the "Cult Awareness
Network" (CAN) is going to produce an encyclopedia of everything
else, then label it as "non-Christianized." At that point, the First
Amendment has been sacrificed on their altar of "political/religious
correctness" and the whole -idea- for Constitutional freedoms has
been lost in a brittle aridity of vacuous lacuna called Anglicanism.
I'll give you another chance, this time with reminders located
at the left-margin below, with two (2) right-arrow indents (">>") --
>> Anyone who would apply _ad_hominem_ procedures in the
>> political context, either arguing "from authority" or "against moron",
>> is -missing- essential points which locate arguments in the issues.
>> See if you can discuss the LaRouche website without logical fallacy:
>>
>> The Logical Fallacies: Table of Contents
>> http://www.intrepidsoftware.com/fallacy/toc.htm
>>
- regards
- jb
------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.mich.com/~pnsnv/othershit/squick.html
------------------------------------------------------------
Don Ocean
- wrote:
> "John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> > Try his 15 year fraud conviction for starters (assuming simple common
> > sense or his lengthy history won't do it). The guy is a con man and
> > fruitcake and preys on the young and stupid (and the old and stupid
> > for that matter). Uses very similar techniques to other cultist groups.
> > Years ago he use to set up at the airports like the Moonies
> > (re: Fusion Energy Foundation scam).
>
> Do YOU second-guess the courts and juries? LaRouche did NOT
> -escape- from prison; he was -released- from prison.
Yes...After he served time for defrauding many many elderly out of their life
savings.
He was a loon way back when and now he has gotten worse... Socialist/communist
party..wasn't it? You people just don't seem to go away...No matter how bad
you
screw things up...You just keep coming back.. Please go play with the Muslims..
> Perhaps you had
> no concept of the fact that jailers, police lawyers, judges, courts,
> etc., are fundamentally -interposed- between lynch mobs (you), and
> justice (civil society). I'm thoroughly in -favor- of having evidence
> describing the story of conviction with 15-year fraud all laid out.
> Having done so, one then needs to "explain" why there are so many
> of "the young and stupid" that -YOU- failed to shepherd, that were
> products of those public schools paid by YOUR tax dollars.
His charges..court trial were public...totally above board and available for
any
and all to peruse today. When he is asked to speak about his guilt or
innocence,
well he refuses.. They got him on Primie Facie evidence. I would have had him
publicly flogged for his cras misdeeds to the elderly.
> Anybody
> who could, at age 80, do what Lyndon LaRouche is still doing,
> deserves an even break. When you are age 80 then check back
> with us for a "brain overhaul" to see how well -YOU- are doing.
Maybe we should send Dotor Kervorkian to look him over ;-)
>
>
> What is one man's meat is another man's poison: what is one
> man's "cult" is another man's "culture." Face it: among the basic
> questions here concern just "who and what" are trying to vie for
> the hearts and minds of citizens. Eventually, the "Cult Awareness
> Network" (CAN) is going to produce an encyclopedia of everything
> else, then label it as "non-Christianized." At that point, the First
> Amendment has been sacrificed on their altar of "political/religious
> correctness" and the whole -idea- for Constitutional freedoms has
> been lost in a brittle aridity of vacuous lacuna called Anglicanism.
Just another psycho-babbler.... Whatta waste of bandwidth!!
Dave Simpson
> Conspracy theorist seem especially popular these day, especially with the
> easily duped far left and far right that hate Bush and Israel... lol.
> Remember Lyndon, Dave? :) :
> http://www.rickross.com/reference/larouche/larouche6.html
Ah, yes, Queen Elizabeth, the Royal Drug Pusher.
Dave Simpson
ralph gibbons
> John wrote:
>
> > Conspracy theorist seem especially popular these day, especially with the
> > easily duped far left and far right that hate Bush and Israel... lol.
> > Remember Lyndon, Dave? :) :
> > http://www.rickross.com/reference/larouche/larouche6.html
Rick Ross? That would be Rick "Rocks in the Box", a nickname he
acquired for the modus operandi he employed, during the jewel heist he
was convicted of. Now, he's an expert source.
Dave Simpson
[What's with the boneheaded failure to capitalize on USENET?]
> Rick Ross? That would be Rick "Rocks in the Box", a nickname he
> acquired for the modus operandi he employed, during the jewel heist he
> was convicted of. Now, he's an expert source.
In case you have been asleep for decades, LaRouche's charge against
the Queen of being a drug pusher is old, old news. One needn't depend
on any single source for this.
Dave Simpson
-
>> "John" <Jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> Try his 15 year fraud conviction for starters (assuming simple common
>>> sense or his lengthy history won't do it). The guy is a con man and
>>> fruitcake and preys on the young and stupid (and the old and stupid
>>> for that matter). Uses very similar techniques to other cultist groups.
>>> Years ago he use to set up at the airports like the Moonies
>>> (re: Fusion Energy Foundation scam).
> - wrote:
>> Do YOU second-guess the courts and juries? LaRouche did NOT
>> -escape- from prison; he was -released- from prison.
Don Ocean <oc...@amerion.com> wrote:
> Yes...After he served time for defrauding many many elderly out of
> their life savings.
Interesting. How does LaRouche then compare to Enron,
WorldCom, Harken, Haliburton, etc., of today?
> He was a loon way back when and now he has gotten worse...
> Socialist/communist party..wasn't it? You people just don't seem to go
> away...No matter how bad you screw things up...You just keep coming
> back.. Please go play with the Muslims..
It's difficult to imagine that an 80-year-old swings a baseball
bat as he may have done, at age 45. So I don't suppose that things
are getting "worse" for his political movement, though one could say
that things get "worse" for the individuals, as they would for anyone.
>> Perhaps you had
>> no concept of the fact that jailers, police lawyers, judges, courts,
>> etc., are fundamentally -interposed- between lynch mobs (you), and
>> justice (civil society). I'm thoroughly in -favor- of having evidence
>> describing the story of conviction with 15-year fraud all laid out.
>> Having done so, one then needs to "explain" why there are so many
>> of "the young and stupid" that -YOU- failed to shepherd, that were
>> products of those public schools paid by YOUR tax dollars.
> His charges..court trial were public...totally above board and
> available for any and all to peruse today. When he is asked to
> speak about his guilt or innocence, well he refuses.. They got
> him on Primie Facie evidence. I would have had him publicly
> flogged for his cras misdeeds to the elderly.
Let's posit that his early release, quite possibly with parole
and even allowing an ankle-bracelet (serving 5 years out of 15),
may have been plea bargained on condition that LaRouche not
discuss any aspects of his own case. Not unreasonable, actually.
Given those parameters, now consider what political game-plans
are still available for "the elderly" in general. Is it your notion
of the American experiment in plural democracy that -NO- voice
is permitted from those who were -released- (not escaped) from
prison, having -fulfilled- their punitive obligations to the courts?
Conceivably, LaRouche continues his work, even as a form of
public community service. It's doubtful that anyone who listens
to LaRouche, follows the LaRouche phenomena, studies the
wealth of present and past Larouche literature, is unaware of
the story of Lyndon Larouche,jr., even in all its sordid aspects.
Who would kick a man when he's down? What is compassion?
As for those who contribute to renegade political movements:
to what degree should courts -intervene- upon _caveat_emptor_ ?
>> Anybody
>> who could, at age 80, do what Lyndon LaRouche is still doing,
>> deserves an even break. When you are age 80 then check back
>> with us for a "brain overhaul" to see how well -YOU- are doing.
> Maybe we should send Dotor Kervorkian to look him over ;-)
No, Kevorkianism "works" only by means of volunteerism.
I think you missed the basic point, concerning Kevorkianism.
Conceivably there might be a day when you elect for Kevorkian.
>> What is one man's meat is another man's poison: what is one
>> man's "cult" is another man's "culture." Face it: among the basic
>> questions here concern just "who and what" are trying to vie for
>> the hearts and minds of citizens. Eventually, the "Cult Awareness
>> Network" (CAN) is going to produce an encyclopedia of everything
>> else, then label it as "non-Christianized." At that point, the First
>> Amendment has been sacrificed on their altar of "political/religious
>> correctness" and the whole -idea- for Constitutional freedoms has
>> been lost in a brittle aridity of vacuous lacuna called Anglicanism.
> Just another psycho-babbler.... Whatta waste of bandwidth!!
Others may have said it more succinctly, but the fact remains
that CAN might itself be another form of "cultism." I have spoken
with a number of deprogrammers, but it is not clear to me whether
programmers or deprogrammers are the winners of Chess games.
LaRouche has already declared his political position as hostile
to British Influence, and thereby antipathy toward Anglicanism. For
CAN to critique LaRouche, without taking into account the substance
of LaRouche's message, not unlike the message of early Pilgrims to
Plymouth Rock, operates at skew purposes and fails to communicate.
CAN's approach is clearly Anglican, by its encyclopedic anti-Theology.
- regards
- jb
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------