Predetermination in the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct
Peter Douglas Zohrab
democracies is that Feminist ideologues and organised pressure-groups
dominate the media and education system and determine the questions that
Society focuses on and predetermine the answers that will be given to those
questions. The Report of the Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct
http://www.cipc.govt.nz/cipc.nsf/wpg_URL/Agency-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-Police-Conduct-Table-of-Contents?OpenDocument
is a classic example of this predetermination, and the diagram below
outlines the process in that particular case.
Men make numerous allegations of police misconduct, but none result in
a Commissiion of Inquiry. Two women makes allegations of police misconduct,
and sections of the Feminist media turn this into a major campaign. A
female Prime Minister, Helen Clark, establishes a Commission of Inquiry
The Commission of Inquiry comprised one man and one woman The man is
removed. The sole woman in charge proceeds to appoint anti-male "experts"
and to pursue an anti-male agenda.
In the Simon Wallace case http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0105/S00140.htm ,
for example, a man was shot dead by police, and the family had to go to the
expense of a private prosecution, because no Commission of Inquiry was
established.
In its Submission to the Commission of Inquiry into Police Conduct
http://equality.netfirms.com/polcndct.html, the New Zealand Equality
Education Foundation made some initial comments, and in the article "Open
Letter to Helen Clark on Lesbian Feminist Morality
http://equality.netfirms.com/pmraving.html ," I criticised some aspects of
the mentality underlying this Commission of Inquiry. However, the Report of
the Commission of Inquiry itself is also in need of severe criticism.
Terms of Reference
Margaret Bazley refers to "the exploitation of vulnerable people", but the
terms of reference of the Commission of Inquiry
http://www.cipc.govt.nz/cipc.nsf/Files/Vol2App1/$file/Vol2App1.pdf related
only to the specific offence of sexual assault and the moral issue of sexual
behaviour, although the wider issue of police conduct in general was touched
on as well. Therefore Bazley was not likely to have received evidence about
police exploitation of vulnerable people in general, but only as it related
to sexual matters -- principally involving female complainants. This
limitation meant that she was not really in a position to refer to the
exploitation of vulnerable people in general.
This limitation of the terms of inquiry is a result of the sexist hysteria
of the media which precipitated the inquiry, and the gross sexism of Helen
Clark, who set up the Commission of Inquiry. See my article: Dildomedia
Angry at Police Insubordination http://equality.netfirms.com/dildomed.html.
Bazley states that "the risk that misconduct, particularly sexual
misconduct, poses to public confidence in the police is a significant one."
Again, the issue here is that (from evidence that has come to my ears, and
from my own experience) a certain (perhaps large) proportion of the male
population already has a low level of confidence in the police, because of
anecdotes or personal experiences relating to non-sexual misconduct towards
males. Since Bazley's terms of reference (which are not her fault, but the
fault of the feminised media and of the Prime Minister) were focussed on
sexual misconduct, there is a huge risk that the male population will see
this inquiry as evidence that the media and the Labour Party only care about
women, which is fact the case.
Private Sexual Behaviour
Bazley also refers to "sexual activity of an inappropriate nature", but
neither she nor the Prime Minister, Helen Clark, have stated by what right
they can set moral standards for the police, or what method they have used
to decide what is or is not sexual activity of an inappropriate nature. If
New Zealand were a Democracy, rather than the Distributed Feminazi
Dictatorship that it actually is, then these two women would have been
forced to explain in a transparent manner what the legal basis is for
banning heterosexual group sex among the Police, while subtly promoting
Lesbianism, for example. See my Open Letter to Helen Clark on Lesbian
Feminist Morality http://equality.netfirms.com/pmraving.html
Sexist Incompetence
Bazley also refers to "negative, stereotyped views of complainants; and a
culture of scepticism in dealing with complaints of sexual assault."
However, the validity of this description depends on the nature of Bazley's
own biases and the state of her knowledge about sexual allegations. After
all, she is just a former public servant who was probably promoted over the
heads of more able male colleagues, in order to prove that women were not
being discriminated against. There is no evidence that I have heard that she
has qualifications in the sexual allegations area. She almost certainly does
not know that one study found that 40% of complainants actually admitted
having made complaints of rape that were false (Kanin, Eugene (1994): "False
Rape Allegations." Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol 23,No.1: 81-92 ). Both
Bazley's biases and competence are at issue here. I see no reason to regard
her as anything but a silly old bint carrying out a political hatchet-job on
male police officers.
Police Culture
Bazley criticises what she sees as the police's "strong bonding amongst
colleagues, a male-oriented culture, attitudes towards the use of alcohol,
and dual standards with respect to on-duty and off-duty behaviours." Strong
bonding, although it makes the investigation of police misbehaviour
diffcult, is obviously a positive feature in other respects, as the report
itself points out
http://www.cipc.govt.nz/cipc.nsf/wpg_URL/Agency-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-Police-Conduct-7-Police-Attitudes-to-Investigations-and-Disclosure-of-Wrongdoing?OpenDocument#7.12.
If this bonding is reduced, then the positive effects of bonding will also
be reduced, and the police will become demoralised and less effective.
The implication is that female work culture is superior to male work
culture, which is a sexist and baseless assumption. The term "male-oriented
culture", as a term of abuse, is obviously a feature of the Wellington
Lesbian culture. One must assume that Bazley prefers an office culture of
mutual female bitchiness.
Similarly, men tend to have traditions around alcohol that one could not
expect a Wellington Lesbian to approve of (if that is the standard being
applied here), but that is not relevant. And "dual standards with respect to
on-duty and off-duty behaviours" are obviously essential, because the police
must maintain high standards at work, but must be allowed to let their hair
down when off-duty, or stress will get on top of them and no one will want
to be a police officer. It is clear that Bazley's ideal police officer is a
woman -- if not a Lesbian. It seems that Bazley has not done any relevant
reading, so I recommend she read relevant sections of "Introduction to
Forensic Psychology", by Arrigo and Shipley (2nd ed., Elsevier 2005), even
though the book is grossly Feminist and sexist in other respects
http://equality.netfirms.com/arrigosh.html .
So-Called "Experts"
Bazley hear evidence from what she was pleased to call "international
experts."
http://www.cipc.govt.nz/cipc.nsf/wpg_URL/Agency-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-Police-Conduct-7-Police-Attitudes-to-Investigations-and-Disclosure-of-Wrongdoing?OpenDocument#7.10
It is facile to attach the label "expert" to such people, because Western
universities are grossly politicised, and the Social Sciences, in
particular, are little more than Socialist, man-hating political parties.
Jan Jordan, in particular, is grossly anti-male and has long been, until
recently, in denial about the reality of fales sexual allegations, and her
Criminology colleagues at Victoria University seems to be much the same
http://equality.netfirms.com/passoff.html.
Getting Rid of the Man
While there was still a man on this Commission of Inquiry (the Hon Justice
Robertson), and I was not taking a detailed interest in it, I went to see a
lawyer about a totally unrelated consumer rights matter. I had also
(unsuccessfully) tried the get that lawyer to take a Men's Rights case --
also in a totally unrelated matter. When I went to see him, that lawyer,
Michael Leggat, used the opportunity to suggest to me that Margaret Bazley
was level-headed and able to carry out the work of the Commission by
herself. Since he was asking for my opinion, I repled that I didn't know
anything about her, to speak of. Although Michael Leggat was in other
respects an exemplary lawyer, I object to what seemed to be almost a corrupt
way of sounding people out before making political changes.
Since the Government appoints judges, and the Hon Justice Robertson was
appointed to the Court of Appeal
http://www.cipc.govt.nz/cipc.nsf/wpg_URL/Agency-Commission-of-Inquiry-into-Police-Conduct-1-Introduction-and-Context?OpenDocument#orderMay25
shortly after resigning from the Commission of Inquiry, I think it is highly
likely that he was offered a promotion in order to allow Margaret Bazley to
make unfettered, sexist use of her powers as sole Commissioner.
Non-Sequitur Recommendation
The recommendation:
R50 New Zealand Police should continue its efforts to increase the numbers
of women and those from ethnic minority groups in the police force in order
to promote a diverse organisational culture that reflects the community it
serves and to enhance the effective and impartial investigation of
complaints alleging sexual assault by members of the police or by associates
of the police
is not based on an impartial consideration of all the evidence that would be
relevant. No submissions were called on this issue. It is grossly
incompetent and sexist of Margaret Bazley to claim that this conclusion can
fairly be drawn from the information submitted to the Commission. This
conclusion is a predetermined, a priori agenda long held by Feminists, and
the only way it can be put into practice is by discriminating against men
and certain ethnic groups, by enforcing doubl\e standards. See my article:
Police Legal Adviser Calls Police Human Resources Manager a Liar
http://equality.netfirms.com/policlie.html , in which you will see that a
Police Legal Advisory Officer states (in letter of 21 December 2006,
paragraph 3) that a change in the number of women may not necessarily change
the culture of the organisation. I am not siding with one against the other
here -- my point is that Margaret Bazley made Recommendation R50 on the
basis of a predetermined agenda, rather than on the evidence.
Peter Zohrab
--
Judge questions abortion legality
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/9115/judge-questions-legality-abortions
Dildomedia Angry at Police Insubordination
http://equality.netfirms.com/dildomed.html Journalistic Incompetence of BBC
Feminist Political Party equality.netfirms.com/incmpbbc.html Bull Buster
http://antimisandry.com/vbdr/bullbusters Income-Splitting
www.parentschoice08.blogspot.com/ Lynda, Man-Hater
equality.netfirms.com/manhater.html Paternity Orders and Parentage Tests
Bill
www.unitedfuture.org.nz/assets/sm/444/46/FamilyProceedingsPaternityOrdersandParentageTestsAmendmentBill1.pdf
