Right-wing storm troopers cave in!!!
Soccernut
>From the Associated Press, January 5, 1996:
> Republicans sped legislation through the House to return hundreds
> of thousands of federal workers to work and near an end to the
> 21-day partial government shutdown. Leaders hoped to push the bill
> through the Senate and send it to President Clinton for his
> expected signature. The legislation would return 280,000 workers to
> their jobs and reimburse them for lost salaries, plus pay 480,000
> others who have had to work without wages since the shutdown began
> Dec. 16.
>Wa hoppen, babies!
We will see. We lost a battle not the war!!! The only babies I see
on TV are the democrats crying and whining.
At least we were not caught in a lie like Hillary. Wait until the
rest of travegate comes out. And this is the people that yo think
America will believe. Not in your wildest dreams.
Kern
>HR
TrlrTrax
of thousands of federal workers to work and near an end to the
Wa hoppen, babies!<<
The funding is tied to the condition Clinton finally present his own
numbers on how he wants to achieve a balanced budget, so that he and the
GOP leaders can finally sit down and negotiate with numbers - not
rhetoric. Until he does, funding will not be released.
Voltaire
>From the Associated Press, January 5, 1996:
>
> Republicans sped legislation through the House to return hundreds
> of thousands of federal workers to work and near an end to the
> 21-day partial government shutdown. Leaders hoped to push the bill
> through the Senate and send it to President Clinton for his
> expected signature. The legislation would return 280,000 workers to
> their jobs and reimburse them for lost salaries, plus pay 480,000
> others who have had to work without wages since the shutdown began
> Dec. 16.
>
>Wa hoppen, babies!
The Republican Party can read the polls. The public blames the GOP for
the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
Voltaire
John Schutrick
>The funding is tied to the condition Clinton finally present his own
>numbers on how he wants to achieve a balanced budget, so that he and the
>GOP leaders can finally sit down and negotiate with numbers - not
>rhetoric. Until he does, funding will not be released.
Wrong. They CAVED.
bwahahahahahahaah...
Shoe
William R. Discipio Jr
: the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
: suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
: and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
: holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
What a laugh! The President (a Democrat) is protecting the weak against
the powerful and vile! The president is so gutless that he will defer
payment for services rendered to a generation that is yet born! If that
ain't the slimy and slick victimizing the defenseless, I don't know what is.
: Voltaire
--
crl23% finger volt...@chelsea.ios.com
Login: voltai29 Name: Jim KennemurXAXX
Directory: /u/u9/voltai29 Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
No Mail.
D. Weidner
>
>
> on TV are the democrats crying and whining.
>
> At least we were not caught in a lie like Hillary. Wait until the
> rest of travegate comes out. And this is the people that yo think
> America will believe. Not in your wildest dreams.
>
> Kern
Kern,
Have your read "Sleepingwalking Through History" Perhaps this is one
volume you should pick up and read. If you are concerned about lies,
deception, greed, consitiutional violations, war making, etc. from the
Whitehouse, then this is a good book for you to read.
By the way, a Democracy is built upon compromise. It is not ` losing a
battle to win a war` to compromise. If we lose our ability to form
strong compromises in this nation we will lose our Democracy and our
freedom. DGW
Uncle Dave
> Viewing ca. 50% of Americans as "snakes" would seems to me to
> be a philosophical denial of your pen name, Mr Voltaire. How do
> you justify living and working with such unseemly people?
If and when the lower 48 discover that they are being "had" by the
slitherly upper 2, the number of snakes may be reduced.
Unk
Gary Willford
> =
> On 6 Jan 1996 01:20:14 GMT, hir...@ix.netcom.com(WellWell ) wrote:
> =
> >From the Associated Press, January 5, 1996:
> >
> > Republicans sped legislation through the House to return hundreds
> > of thousands of federal workers to work and near an end to the
> > 21-day partial government shutdown. Leaders hoped to push the bill
> > through the Senate and send it to President Clinton for his
> > expected signature. The legislation would return 280,000 workers to
> > their jobs and reimburse them for lost salaries, plus pay 480,000
> > others who have had to work without wages since the shutdown began
> > Dec. 16.
> >
> >Wa hoppen, babies!
> =
> The Republican Party can read the polls. The public blames the GOP for
> the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
> suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
> and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
> holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
> =
> Voltaire
Yeah, right, and now the Democrats can continue to buy votes with welfare m=
oney stolen from =
working Americans. I would rather have the pockets of the working rich stu=
ffed, than the lazy =
scum on welfare given a free ride on the backs of the middle class. Giving=
money to the rich =
will ALWAYS translate into money for everyone else. Giving a free ride to =
the lazy poor only =
buys votes for liberals.
Gary Willford
The Adversary
-- =
=93My country, may it always be right. But, my country, right OR wrong!=94=
- Stephen Decatur
John Schutrick
>The Republican Party can read the polls. The public blames the GOP for
>the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
>suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
>and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
>holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
Come on, Voltaire! We have to be nice to the neo-cons for a while.
Their heros have made asses of them. The Newtists actually believed
that "I'd rather be right than re-elected" stuff that the right-wing
reps were spouting.
Maybe some day one of our heros will betray us. If that happens, I'm
sure the neo-cons will be nice to us, right?
Shoe
Mark Shaw
volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire) wrote:
> The Republican Party can read the polls. The public blames the GOP for
> the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
> suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
> and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
> holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
Out of the mouths of babes....
This is, except for the last two sentences, pretty much the way it
is, IMO.
If the GOP had a propaganda arm as effective as the Debtocrats', it
might well be the other way around....
--
Mark Shaw PGP public key at ftp.netcom.com:/pub/ms/mshaw
=======================================================================
"Mas vale morir a pie que vivir en rodillas."
- La Pasionara
torgo
>From: jsch...@ix.netcom.com (John Schutrick)
>Subject: Re: Right-wing storm troopers cave in!!!
>Date: Sat, 06 Jan 1996 15:25:12 GMT
>Wrong. They CAVED.
>bwahahahahahahaah...
>Shoe
You're wrong. Since it was obvious that Clinton couldn't care less about all
those poor government workers going without their pay, the GOP leadership did
the only compassionate thing: they got the government working again. There
really wasn't any point in letting Clinton continue to keep the government
closed, since he obviously has no interest in reaching a balanced budget.
d14...@epix.net
John Schutrick
>You're wrong. Since it was obvious that Clinton couldn't care less about all
>those poor government workers going without their pay, the GOP leadership did
>the only compassionate thing: they got the government working again. There
>really wasn't any point in letting Clinton continue to keep the government
>closed, since he obviously has no interest in reaching a balanced budget.
This keeps getting better and better. I sure hope the GOP tries to
sell this "compassion" thing in the election this fall, while they
kill the EITC to give the rich a capital gains tax break.
They SOLD OUT to public opinion. They made you look like a fool. Now
they will lose the respect even of their neo-con limbots.
Shoe
John Schutrick
>The Republican Party can read the polls. The public blames the GOP for
>the shutdown. The President is making political hay and the GOP is
>suffering. The President is defending the weak against the powerful
>and the vile. The Republican snakes will have to crawl back in their
>holes and plan a new way to stuff the pockets of the rich.
Come on, Voltaire! We have to be nice to the neo-cons for a while.
John Schutrick
>Yeah, right, and now the Democrats can continue to buy votes with welfare m=
>oney stolen from =
>
>working Americans. I would rather have the pockets of the working rich stu=
>ffed, than the lazy =
>
>scum on welfare given a free ride on the backs of the middle class. Giving=
> money to the rich =
>
>will ALWAYS translate into money for everyone else. Giving a free ride to =
>the lazy poor only =
>
>buys votes for liberals.
I guess anyone knows about non-productive leeches stealing money from
working Americans, its a "lawyer2b". And of course, the House is full
of lawyers.
But now it's _your_ neo-con majority that's doing the stealing.
Remember the your glorious revolution?
Cavein City, the capital of the great state of Betrayal. You live
there. As your compadres are so fond of saying, cope with it.
Real Americans are laughing at you.
Shoe
d14...@epix.net
d14...@epix.net
potparty
prescription drug...write that down...h.r.2618!
torgo
>From: jsch...@ix.netcom.com (John Schutrick)
>Subject: Re: Right-wing storm troopers cave in!!!
>Shoe
Spin it however you like, comrade. The bottom line is that when the dust
settles we will finally have a balanced budget. You can claim victory over the
shutdown skirmish if you like, be my guest. Hail the conquering heroes. But
the war will be won by the GOP.
Gary Willford
> =
> Here's what Gary Willford wrote:
> =
> >Yeah, right, and now the Democrats can continue to buy votes with welfar=
e m=3D
> >oney stolen from =3D
> >
> >working Americans. I would rather have the pockets of the working rich =
stu=3D
> >ffed, than the lazy =3D
> >
> >scum on welfare given a free ride on the backs of the middle class. Giv=
ing=3D
> > money to the rich =3D
> >
> >will ALWAYS translate into money for everyone else. Giving a free ride =
to =3D
> >the lazy poor only =3D
> >
> >buys votes for liberals.
> =
> I guess anyone knows about non-productive leeches stealing money from
> working Americans, its a "lawyer2b". And of course, the House is full
> of lawyers.
I wouldn't know, I'm not a lawyer. I work a 12 hour day and then go to law=
school at night for 4 =
or 5 hours. How many hours do YOU put in?
> But now it's _your_ neo-con majority that's doing the stealing.
> Remember the your glorious revolution?
They haven't "stolen" anything. They caved in, I'll grant that, and I'll r=
emember in November, =
as the saying goes. =
=
> Cavein City, the capital of the great state of Betrayal. You live
> there. As your compadres are so fond of saying, cope with it.
We will, don't worry.
=
> Real Americans are laughing at you.
Real Americans voted in the current Congress. I seriously doubt if any of =
them are laughing now.
=
Mark Shaw
> support h.r.2618 to reclassify hemp/pot/marijuana as a DEA schedule 2
> prescription drug...write that down...h.r.2618!
Try to stay on-topic, willya?
It might help if you'd put the bong down an hour or so before posting.
--
Mark Shaw PGP public key at ftp.netcom.com:/pub/ms/mshaw
=======================================================================
"What if Nancy Reagan had accepted a $100,000 bribe,
lightly disquised as commoditities profits?" - Ben Stein
D. Weidner
<lawy...@wolfenet.com> wrote:
>
> Real Americans voted in the current Congress. I seriously doubt if any of =
> them are laughing now.
> =
>
> Gary Willford
> The Adversary
>
> -- =
>
> =93My country, may it always be right. But, my country, right OR wrong!=94=
>
> - Stephen Decatur
Oh Gary!! The sophistry doth pour forth from your keyboard. This is
certainly the greatest country on Earth...BUT > "but, my coutry, right OR
wrong!..." How simple, how elegantly profane in its' ignorance is that
saying. This country is great because of the ability that Americans have
to right the wrongs, not accept them regardless... Right and wrong have
very different consequences, and consequences matter to all of us, whether
we are aware of them or not. DGW
John Schutrick
>I work a 12 hour day and then go to law school at night for 4 or 5 hours. How
>many hours do YOU put in?
You neo-cons believe that it's not the hours, it's how much money you
make, right?
>They haven't "stolen" anything. They caved in, I'll grant that, and I'll
>remember in November, as the saying goes.
Good for you. See that you do.
I wrote:
>> Real Americans are laughing at you.
Gary replied:
>Real Americans voted in the current Congress.
Remember what Abe Lincoln said about fooling some of the people all of
the time and some of the people all of the time?
Gary:
>I seriously doubt if any of them are laughing now.
Some are laughing, others are squirming, the villians of the piece are
lyin' and justifyin'.
Shoe
Voltaire
wrote:
>In article <4cn45v$u...@guava.epix.net>, d14...@epix.net wrote:
>
>If and when the lower 48 discover that they are being "had" by the
>slitherly upper 2, the number of snakes may be reduced.
>
>Unk
I was going to ask Epic where he got the absurd idea that 50% of the
American public consider themselves to be Republicans. I guess he is
another firm believer of the Rush School of Argument where you just
pull numbers out of your ass and they become "FACTS".
Brett Kottmann
Voltaire is really Jim Kennemur. He claims to need anonymity
because someone might kill him. (Really!) William Discipio fingered
his account and got his real name, and now uses the finger reply as
a .sig.
Apparently Jim thinks he will be killed because he thinks people
on the net are just like him, as his fake finger reply about Mr.
Discipio says:
: netcom23% finger disc...@crl.com
: Login: discipio Name: William Discipio
: Directory: u/uu/discipio Shell: /usr/local/bin/ah
: No Mail.
: Plan: I hope to despoil as many 10 year old boys as I
: possibly can. That's why I live in California where they
: grow young and sweet.
I told Jim to research the concept of "public figure" and how
they can't expect the same degree of either privacy or protection from
potential libels/slanders as private figures.
Apparently he didn't do his homework, because implying that
someone wants to rape boys is libel no matter how public the figure.
I urge Mr. Discipio to contact an attorney, as well as Mr. Kennemur's
Internet provider.
We're all used to the accusations of lying, being a totalitarian
of various flavors, etc. But trying to say someone is a child abuser?
You've crossed the Rubicon, Mr. Kennemur. Hope you find your imminent
disconnect pleasant.
Brett
___________________________________________________________________________
Amtrak Train Green Card Guns Militia Bomb Oklahoma City White House
Clinton Minutemen Freedom Revolution Founding Fathers Right Wing Sex Waco
Pornography Koresh (getting tired of your keyword searches finding this? :)
Voltaire
Kottmann) wrote:
> Apparently Jim thinks he will be killed because he thinks people
>on the net are just like him, as his fake finger reply about Mr.
>Discipio says:
>
>: netcom23% finger disc...@crl.com
>: Login: discipio Name: William Discipio
>: Directory: u/uu/discipio Shell: /usr/local/bin/ah
>: No Mail.
>
>: Plan: I hope to despoil as many 10 year old boys as I
>: possibly can. That's why I live in California where they
>: grow young and sweet.
>
> I told Jim to research the concept of "public figure" and how
>they can't expect the same degree of either privacy or protection from
>potential libels/slanders as private figures.
I am a public figure because I have a PPP account????
> We're all used to the accusations of lying, being a totalitarian
>of various flavors, etc. But trying to say someone is a child abuser?
>You've crossed the Rubicon, Mr. Kennemur. Hope you find your imminent
>disconnect pleasant.
Counselor Brett. Were you a jailhouse lawyer?
First of all, libel is out of the question because I have spoken to
no one on here.
Second of all, to prove slander the party bring the suit will have to
prove (1) that I ever posted such a document. It is a simple matter
to edit any information found on a Usenet group. This in and of itself
makes the proof almost impossible. By the way, you just posted the
finger file you suggest I composed. Are you now open to civil suit?
(2) That I knew the statement to be false. I have no idea what anyone
on here does in their spare time. And I do not care. It is non of my
business. (3) That I intended to do the person bringing the suit
damage or harm.
Thirdly. Such a case would have to be handled in federal court because
of the use of interstate phone lines and multiple state locations of
the parties unless the plaintiff is also a resident Texas. Take this
sort of frivolous lawsuit to a lawyer licensed to practice before the
federal bench and watch him laugh as he tells you about the backlog
due to bankruptcies and drug cases in the federal court system.
This sort of harassment is what any liberal can expect if they allow
their name to fall into the hands of those whose conservatives views
can not stand the light of inspection and questioning.
Please to not clutter my mailbox with any more of your inane
ramblings. I no longer communicate with any of the small group of net
deviants who hunt these areas like mad dogs. Life is good.
Voltaire
John Schutrick
>Hey, I was putting it in terms you leftists understand. It's not what your=
>produce, it's the effort, right?
Actually, the way big business and you attorney wannabes run the
mega-corporations, it's neither. You get laid off either way.
I wrote:
>> Remember what Abe Lincoln said about fooling some of the people all of
>> the time and some of the people all of the time?
lawyer2b said:
>Yep, and the liberal democrats have been doing it for 40 years. 'bout time=
>this country began to wake up.
A wake-up occurred in '94. For 25 of the last 40 years, those "liberal
democrats" in the White House have had names like Eisenhower, Nixon,
Ford, Reagan, and Bush.
>> Some are laughing, others are squirming, the villians of the piece are
>> lyin' and justifyin'.
Well, D'Amato is willing to spend any amount of your money and an
indefinate amount of time trying to prove that you're right. Four
years and $26 million so far; no end (and no evidence) in sight.
Here again, I'm afraid your heros have made a laughing stock of
themselves...and they're taking you with them.
Shoe
William R. Discipio Jr
: Apparently he didn't do his homework, because implying that
: someone wants to rape boys is libel no matter how public the figure.
: I urge Mr. Discipio to contact an attorney, as well as Mr. Kennemur's
: Internet provider.
Mr. Kennemur has been told by his ISP to stop libeling me. That is why
he killfiled me.
It's wonderful now. I get the last word.
: We're all used to the accusations of lying, being a totalitarian
: of various flavors, etc. But trying to say someone is a child abuser?
: You've crossed the Rubicon, Mr. Kennemur. Hope you find your imminent
: disconnect pleasant.
Jimmy recognized that he went through as many ISP as he dared to. He
realized that IDT is his last hope. Instead of jeapordizing his
privileges with IDT, he decided to killfile me.
I can't say I blame him. Jim's arrogance does not allow him to entertain
any political views he disagrees with without resorting to ad hominem
attacks and outright lies. He knows he can't control his temper.
: Brett
: ___________________________________________________________________________
: Amtrak Train Green Card Guns Militia Bomb Oklahoma City White House
: Clinton Minutemen Freedom Revolution Founding Fathers Right Wing Sex Waco
: Pornography Koresh (getting tired of your keyword searches finding this? :)
Gary Willford
> =
> Here's what Gary Willford <lawy...@wolfenet.com> wrote:
> =
> >I work a 12 hour day and then go to law school at night for 4 or 5 hours=
=2E How
> >many hours do YOU put in?
> =
> You neo-cons believe that it's not the hours, it's how much money you
> make, right?
Hey, I was putting it in terms you leftists understand. It's not what your=
produce, it's the effort, right?
=
> I wrote:
> >> Real Americans are laughing at you.
> =
> Gary replied:
> >Real Americans voted in the current Congress.
> =
> Remember what Abe Lincoln said about fooling some of the people all of
> the time and some of the people all of the time?
Yep, and the liberal democrats have been doing it for 40 years. 'bout time=
this country began to wake up.
=
> Gary:
> >I seriously doubt if any of them are laughing now.
> =
> Some are laughing, others are squirming, the villians of the piece are
> lyin' and justifyin'.
Yep, the liars and justifiers are named Bill and Hillary Clinton.
Brett Kottmann
...
just a quickie to point out some real boners by the hateful one:
> First of all, libel is out of the question because I have spoken to
> no one on here.
>
Libel is print, slander is spoken.
> Second of all, to prove slander the party bring the suit will have to
> prove (1) that I ever posted such a document. It is a simple matter
> to edit any information found on a Usenet group. This in and of itself
> makes the proof almost impossible. By the way, you just posted the
News software keeps track of both outgoing and incoming articles.
Didn't think about that, did you?
> finger file you suggest I composed. Are you now open to civil suit?
Nope, even this obviousness escapes you, doesn't it?
> (2) That I knew the statement to be false. I have no idea what anyone
> on here does in their spare time. And I do not care. It is non of my
> business.
Sorry, but knowledge of the truth is only one criteria. You fail
big-time on the other.
(3) That I intended to do the person bringing the suit
> damage or harm.
As in "defamation of character".
You'd fry on that one.
> Thirdly. Such a case would have to be handled in federal court because
> of the use of interstate phone lines and multiple state locations of
> the parties unless the plaintiff is also a resident Texas. Take this
It's a civil suit. He can sue you where he likes, his home state or
yours.
> sort of frivolous lawsuit to a lawyer licensed to practice before the
> federal bench and watch him laugh as he tells you about the backlog
> due to bankruptcies and drug cases in the federal court system.
You really are living in a delusional dream world, aren't you?
> This sort of harassment is what any liberal can expect if they allow
> their name to fall into the hands of those whose conservatives views
> can not stand the light of inspection and questioning.
Complaints over your libel is harassment? Now I've heard everything.
> Please to not clutter my mailbox with any more of your inane
> ramblings.
I didn't mail you anything, fool. Please read up on the difference
between newsgroups and email.
> I no longer communicate with any of the small group of net
> deviants who hunt these areas like mad dogs. Life is good.
Send us a postcard when you get kicked off yet another ISP.
Brett
__________________________________________________________________
http://www.erinet.com/bkottman/brett.html --Me
http://www.erinet.com/bkottman/reagan.html --The Gipper
William R. Discipio Jr
I guess I'm not the only one that has tasted first hand Kennemur's
arrogant denial and abject lies.
Kennemur is a real piece of work. It's no wonder he and Rack Jite get
along so well.
I think I'd like to press charges against Kennemur... just to see the
look on his face when a judges declares him "guilty as charged." I'd
really love to see the level of denial he would sink to after that.
Brett Kottmann (bkot...@erinet.com) wrote:
William R. Discipio Jr
Watch the weasel, Jim Kennemur, deny he fabricated the .sig file where he
claimed I molested children.
This guy Kennemur doesn't even have the balls to stand by his smear.
Voltaire (volt...@chelsea.ios.com) wrote:
: On 13 Jan 1996 02:40:47 -0500, bkot...@eri.erinet.com (Brett
: Kottmann) wrote:
: > Apparently Jim thinks he will be killed because he thinks people
: >on the net are just like him, as his fake finger reply about Mr.
: >Discipio says:
: >
: >: netcom23% finger disc...@crl.com
: >: Login: discipio Name: William Discipio
: >: Directory: u/uu/discipio Shell: /usr/local/bin/ah
: >: No Mail.
: >
: >: Plan: I hope to despoil as many 10 year old boys as I
: >: possibly can. That's why I live in California where they
: >: grow young and sweet.
: >
: > I told Jim to research the concept of "public figure" and how
: >they can't expect the same degree of either privacy or protection from
: >potential libels/slanders as private figures.
: I am a public figure because I have a PPP account????
: > We're all used to the accusations of lying, being a totalitarian
: >of various flavors, etc. But trying to say someone is a child abuser?
: >You've crossed the Rubicon, Mr. Kennemur. Hope you find your imminent
: >disconnect pleasant.
: Counselor Brett. Were you a jailhouse lawyer?
: First of all, libel is out of the question because I have spoken to
: no one on here.
: Second of all, to prove slander the party bring the suit will have to
: prove (1) that I ever posted such a document. It is a simple matter
: to edit any information found on a Usenet group. This in and of itself
: makes the proof almost impossible. By the way, you just posted the
Kennemur, you are a slimey guy.
: finger file you suggest I composed. Are you now open to civil suit?
: (2) That I knew the statement to be false. I have no idea what anyone
: on here does in their spare time. And I do not care. It is non of my
: business. (3) That I intended to do the person bringing the suit
: damage or harm.
Weasel.
: Thirdly. Such a case would have to be handled in federal court because
: of the use of interstate phone lines and multiple state locations of
: the parties unless the plaintiff is also a resident Texas. Take this
: sort of frivolous lawsuit to a lawyer licensed to practice before the
: federal bench and watch him laugh as he tells you about the backlog
: due to bankruptcies and drug cases in the federal court system.
: This sort of harassment is what any liberal can expect if they allow
: their name to fall into the hands of those whose conservatives views
: can not stand the light of inspection and questioning.
Note that Kennemur claims that the type of harrasment he engages in is
what any liberal can expect. It funny that the self-proclaimed liberals
like Kennemur are the only ones engaging in such smear and libel.
: Please to not clutter my mailbox with any more of your inane
: ramblings. I no longer communicate with any of the small group of net
: deviants who hunt these areas like mad dogs. Life is good.
After Kennemur initiated his first strike attacks at my email, he has the
audacity to demand others don't send him email.
Sheesh, you are a _W A C K O_.
: Voltaire
William R. Discipio Jr
: In <4dcq9j$f...@crl4.crl.com> disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio Jr)
: writes:
: >
: >
: >I guess I'm not the only one that has tasted first hand Kennemur's
: >
: >Kennemur is a real piece of work. It's no wonder he and Rack Jite get
: >along so well.
: >
: >I think I'd like to press charges against Kennemur...
: I'll bet you do. I'll bet you lay awake at night and dream of yourself
: sending literally millions of people who have offended you (for, having
: met you, who could resist it?) to the gallows for their crimes.
As I said, your hyperbole is *bizzare*. Do you really believe the stuff
you spew? Do you really believe that you are so superior to everybody
else as your whining letter suggests?
: I still think they need to check the voltage on your electroshock
: therapy.
Sure, what a good liberal. Anybody that you disagree with needs some
form of treatment or reeducation... you and Stalin, both.
: RH
Richard Hanson
writes:
>
>
>I guess I'm not the only one that has tasted first hand Kennemur's
>arrogant denial and abject lies.
>
>Kennemur is a real piece of work. It's no wonder he and Rack Jite get
>along so well.
>
>I think I'd like to press charges against Kennemur...
I'll bet you do. I'll bet you lay awake at night and dream of yourself
sending literally millions of people who have offended you (for, having
met you, who could resist it?) to the gallows for their crimes.
I still think they need to check the voltage on your electroshock
therapy.
RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
Jimmy, how badly *DID* my ISP slap you for your continued harassment?
: They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
: they are all just sneer and bullshit.
Kennemur is the pot calling everything black, again. What a vile
individual you are.
: Typical bullies.
Typical irony.
: I haven't read
: one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
: January 2.
Is *THAT* why you find yourself replying to me on many occasions?! <snicker>
: I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
: is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
: to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
: Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
: activity is "chickenshit."
Speaking of hot air...
: Voltaire
William R. Discipio Jr
Organization: US Peace Corps 800 424-8580
Distribution:
Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
: sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
: since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
: least they're being more honest this way.
Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
I really got a laugh from your letter where you complain about the
name-calling and all. It is the best example of hypocrisy I have ever
seen. <chuckle>
: RH
Voltaire
wrote:
Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
activity is "chickenshit."
Voltaire
Richard Hanson
writes:
I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
least they're being more honest this way.
RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: In <4djrti$1...@crl3.crl.com> disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio Jr)
: writes:
: >
: >.75.50> <30F8B5...@erinet.com> <4dcq9j$f...@crl4.crl.com>
: <4df2op$o...@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <30fc71c...@198.4.75.50>
: <4di11t$1...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
: >Organization: US Peace Corps 800 424-8580
: >Distribution:
: >
: >Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
: >
: >: sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
: >: since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
: >: least they're being more honest this way.
: >Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
: >
: >I really got a laugh from your letter where you complain about the
: >name-calling and all. It is the best example of hypocrisy I have ever
: >seen.
: You obviously don't proofread your own posts.
Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity. It can't be as glaring as
the hypocrisy exhibited by your continued childish behavior including:
bludgeoning anybody that doesn't hold your political views,
mischaracterizing anybody you disagree with as a right winger (eg
womack), using reactionary hate talk (the freshmen repulicans are
committing treason), outright lies (discipio admitts ...), smear
(discipio is a substance abuser, discipio is a child abuser) and
gutlessness (running away after womack handed you your head on a platter)
considering that you spent quite a bit of time writing a polished piece
accusing people of treating you with the contemptable behavior that
characterizes your entire being.
You are a funny guy, Richard.
Bill Whitehouse
Discipio Jr) wrote:
> Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity.
Translation: Please point out the bleeding obvious so that I can sit
back and throw glib canned retorts back like "Proof?" and "Your point?"
Discipio, I may not know much about Mr. Hanson, but I f*cking _know_
you're a hypocrite. Not like you've kept it a secret or anything.
Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4dkong$j...@crl12.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
: Discipio Jr) wrote:
: >
: > Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity.
: Your recent exchange with me exposed all of the hypocritical elements
: in you you mentioned: characterizing people as left-wing anarchists
: who don't hold your political view, using reactionary ad hominems,
: outright lies, smear and particularly _gutlessness_. Try not acting
: like such a whining Gingrich, Mr. Hypocrite. Thanks.
Please wipe the spit off your chin. Thanks.
: Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
:
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4djrti$1...@crl3.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio
: Jr)
: >
: > : I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
: > : sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
: > : since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
: > : least they're being more honest this way.
: >
: > Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
: > allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
: Obviously you have, Mr. Hypocrite. Especially seeing how you couldn't
: help yourself from proving exactly what Mr. Hanson said in your response.
Learn to make sense, Bill. You sound like a raving lunatic.
Richard Hanson
writes:
>
>.75.50> <30F8B5...@erinet.com> <4dcq9j$f...@crl4.crl.com>
<4df2op$o...@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <30fc71c...@198.4.75.50>
<4di11t$1...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
>Organization: US Peace Corps 800 424-8580
>Distribution:
>
>
>: I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
>: sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
>: since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
>: least they're being more honest this way.
>
>Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
>allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
>
>name-calling and all. It is the best example of hypocrisy I have ever
>seen.
You obviously don't proofread your own posts.
RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: Billy! What's with the new spit fetish? I thought breasts were your
: thing.
Gee Richie, your IQ must be about double Kennemurs' 40. What a brilliant
comeback. Wow!
How does your head look after it's been handed to you on a silver
platter, figuratively speaking?
: RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: Here's a guy who hasn't missed a chance to post onto one of my articles
: since he first took offence, and I'M childish?
Richard Hanson can't keep himself from lying. I didn't post the asinine
article you are refereing to. I simply responded to it.
: Grow up, little man.
Richard Hanson: liar, hypocrite, smear artist, shill. Will you add any
more?
Richie, you still haven't told us which congressional office you are
posting from.
Bill Whitehouse
Jr)
>
> : I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
> : sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
> : since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
> : least they're being more honest this way.
>
> Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
> allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
Obviously you have, Mr. Hypocrite. Especially seeing how you couldn't
help yourself from proving exactly what Mr. Hanson said in your response.
Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4dkong$j...@crl12.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
: Discipio Jr) wrote:
: > Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity.
: Translation: Please point out the bleeding obvious so that I can sit
: back and throw glib canned retorts back like "Proof?" and "Your point?"
: Discipio, I may not know much about Mr. Hanson, but I f*cking _know_
: you're a hypocrite. Not like you've kept it a secret or anything.
Would you like a handkercheif to wipe the froth from your lips?
: Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Richard Hanson
writes:
>
>Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: In <4djrti$1...@crl3.crl.com> disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio
Jr)
>: writes:
>: >
>: >.75.50> <30F8B5...@erinet.com> <4dcq9j$f...@crl4.crl.com>
>: <4df2op$o...@ixnews8.ix.netcom.com> <30fc71c...@198.4.75.50>
>: <4di11t$1...@ixnews6.ix.netcom.com>
>: >Organization: US Peace Corps 800 424-8580
>: >Distribution:
>: >Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: >
>: >: I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see
their
>: >: sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position.
Besides,
>: >: since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas,
at
>: >: least they're being more honest this way.
>: >
>: >Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
>: >allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
>: >I really got a laugh from your letter where you complain about the
>: >name-calling and all. It is the best example of hypocrisy I have
ever
>: >seen.
>
>: You obviously don't proofread your own posts.
>
as
>the hypocrisy exhibited by your continued childish behavior
Here's a guy who hasn't missed a chance to post onto one of my articles
since he first took offence, and I'M childish?
Grow up, little man.
RH
Richard Hanson
(Bill Whitehouse) writes:
>
>In article <4djrti$1...@crl3.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
Discipio
>Jr)
>>
>> : I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see
their
>> : sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position.
Besides,
>> : since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas,
at
>> : least they're being more honest this way.
>>
>> Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
>> allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
>
>help yourself from proving exactly what Mr. Hanson said in your
response.
BINGO! I keep wondering when this particular knee is going to quit
jerking. So far, no signs of anything like an original comment, all
pure reactions.
RH
Richard Hanson
writes:
>Bill Whitehouse (whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu) wrote:
>: In article <4djrti$1...@crl3.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
Discipio
>: Jr)
>: > Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: >
>: > : I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see
their
>: > : sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position.
Besides,
>: > : since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas,
at
>: > : least they're being more honest this way.
>: >
>: > Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
>: > allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
>
>: Obviously you have, Mr. Hypocrite. Especially seeing how you
couldn't
>: help yourself from proving exactly what Mr. Hanson said in your
response.
>
Watch it, Bill. Disgustio is an expert.
RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4dmsbd$7...@cloner3.netcom.com>, rha...@ix.netcom.com(Richard
: Hanson ) wrote:
: >
: > In <4dm8a4$m...@crl.crl.com> disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio Jr): > >: Obviously you have, Mr. Hypocrite. Especially seeing how you
: > couldn't
: > >: help yourself from proving exactly what Mr. Hanson said in your
: > response.
: > >
: > >Learn to make sense, Bill. You sound like a raving lunatic.
: >
: > Watch it, Bill. Disgustio is an expert.
: Certainly a ranking authority on the boneheaded glib response. I'll
: start making sense to him the day he learns to recognize sense.
Sure Bill. Keep deluding yourself into thinking you make sense. You are
just another KNEE-JERK REACTIONARY. Boooo!
William R. Discipio Jr
: You would sure be the one to have a good supply of handkerchiefs for this
: purpose, wacko.
You are correct. I deal with so many raving lunatics such as yourself.
: --
: Buddy K
synergy
>In article <4dkong$j...@crl12.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
>Discipio Jr) wrote:
>> Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity.
>Translation: Please point out the bleeding obvious so that I can sit
>back and throw glib canned retorts back like "Proof?" and "Your point?"
>Discipio, I may not know much about Mr. Hanson, but I f*cking _know_
>you're a hypocrite. Not like you've kept it a secret or anything.
>Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
What's the matter, Bill? Do the facts that Mr. Discipio presents
offend your deceitful liberal nonsensibilities? You must be new
to the Net, else you would know that Richard Hanson is quite the
laughingstock of the Usenet political newsgroups.
--
========================================================================
"Necessity is the plea of every infringement of human freedom. It is
the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves." -- William Pitt
Annoy a Fascist: Just Say No to Gun Control!
Annoy a Leftist: Think!
"Americans of all political persuasions are coming to the sad realization
that [Hillary Clinton]...is a congenital liar." -- William Safire
William R. Discipio Jr
: William R. Discipio Jr (disc...@crl.com) wrote:
: : Voltaire (volt...@chelsea.ios.com) wrote:
: :
: : : Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
: :
: : Jimmy, how badly *DID* my ISP slap you for your continued harassment?
: Did this really happen? Not that I'd be surprised...
This is my best geuss. He slowly increased his vendetta against me by
harassing the complaint department at CRL. From his responses, I guess
CRL told him to take a flying leap. He continued barraging CRL with
complaints. One day, he was off his old ISP and was on a new one. A
couple of years back, he did the same thing to someone else. Eventually
he started to insult this persons systems administrator. The sysadmin
ensured that Kennemur lost his account.
: --
: Brian M. Carey --> car...@netaxs.com
: "For nothing has done more than the publication of the English Bible to
: encourage freedom of thought and political democracy."
: -Jasper Ridley, _Henry VIII_
: * CYBERCULTURE COMMON SENSE! http://www.netaxs.com/~careyb *
William R. Discipio Jr
: I got a laugh from the message in which he (Rich Hanson) stated that Bob
: Dole wants to pass legislation to hand out assault weapons.
Read Hanson a little bit longer. You will find that his Dole comment
pales in comparison to most of the reactionary hyperbole he spews.
Take a quick search for a post from "womack" where Hanson is handed his
proverbial head on a silver platter. Look for Hanson's absolutely
ludicrous response.
synergy
>Bill Whitehouse (whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu) wrote:
>: Translation: Please point out the bleeding obvious so that I can sit
>: back and throw glib canned retorts back like "Proof?" and "Your point?"
>: Discipio, I may not know much about Mr. Hanson, but I f*cking _know_
>: you're a hypocrite. Not like you've kept it a secret or anything.
>Would you like a handkercheif to wipe the froth from your lips?
I think you'd best give Mr. Whitehouse a large bath towel, if you expect
him to remove much of the froth from his mouth. He seems to be
a raving lunatic.
>: Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
>crl23% finger volt...@chelsea.ios.com
>Login: voltai29 Name: Jim KennemurXAXX
>Directory: /u/u9/voltai29 Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
>No Mail.
Richard Hanson
>: Discipio Jr) wrote:
>: >
>
>: > Please point out my hypocrisy, Mr. Integrity.
>
elements
>: in you you mentioned: characterizing people as left-wing anarchists
>: who don't hold your political view, using reactionary ad hominems,
>: outright lies, smear and particularly _gutlessness_. Try not acting
>: like such a whining Gingrich, Mr. Hypocrite. Thanks.
>
>Please wipe the spit off your chin. Thanks.
Billy! What's with the new spit fetish? I thought breasts were your
thing.
RH
Sneer
[snip]
>: RH
>: --
>: _________________________________________________________
>
>: "The moment a mere numerical superiority by either states or voters
>: in this country proceeds to ignore the needs and desires of the minority,
>: and for their own selfish purpose or advancement, hamper or oppress
>: that minority, or debar them in any way from equal privileges and
>: equal rights--that moment will mark the failure of our
>: constitutional system."
>:
>: Franklin D. Roosevelt Radio Broadcast: Oct 26, 1939
>: _________________________________________________________
"The moment a minority political faction ignores the needs and desires
of the political majority and for their own selfish purpose or advancement,
hamper or oppress that majority, or debar them in any way from their
lawful privileges and rights--that moment will mark the arrival of
tyranny and is the usual cause of political discontent in a nation."
--Sneer Usenet Broadcast: Now
Richard Hanson
writes:
>>Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>[snip]
>>: RH
>>: --
>>: _________________________________________________________
>>
>>: "The moment a mere numerical superiority by either states or voters
>>: in this country proceeds to ignore the needs and desires of the
minority,
>>: and for their own selfish purpose or advancement, hamper or oppress
>>: that minority, or debar them in any way from equal privileges and
>>: equal rights--that moment will mark the failure of our
>>: constitutional system."
>>:
>>: Franklin D. Roosevelt Radio Broadcast: Oct 26, 1939
>>: _________________________________________________________
>
>"The moment a minority political faction ignores the needs and desires
>of the political majority
The Republican Party at the dawning of the New Right.
and for their own selfish purpose or advancement,
>hamper or oppress that majority, or debar them in any way from their
>lawful privileges and rights
The Republican Congress for the last forty years.
--that moment will mark the arrival of
>tyranny and is the usual cause of political discontent in a nation."
> --Sneer Usenet Broadcast: Now
Couldn't agree with you more.
rH
Brian Carey
: Organization: US Peace Corps 800 424-8580
: Distribution:
:
:
: : I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
: : sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
: : since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
: : least they're being more honest this way.
:
: Speaking of honesty, have you smeared anybody with presposterous
: allegations today, Mr. Integrity.
:
: name-calling and all. It is the best example of hypocrisy I have ever
:
I got a laugh from the message in which he (Rich Hanson) stated that Bob
Dole wants to pass legislation to hand out assault weapons.
--
William R. Discipio Jr
: Why don't you point out some "facts" that Willie the Wacko has posted for the
: benefit of those of us who have never seen them.
Here is a fact. Buddy uses religious slurs and ethnic epithets as a
preferred method of argumentation.
: Actually, you already hold the title.
Buddy, you gave your title up?!
: --
: Buddy K
--
William R. Discipio Jr
: And make sure you check out the comment about the OKC building being a
: Federal Kindergarten. My "opponent" so successfully trashed me that he
: hasn't replied yet.
It contained a federal kindergarten. Anyway, out of a thousand word
trashing you think you can salvage your face with a single point. You
are pathetic.
: Maybe he was so proud he exploded.
Your reactionary response was a classic. You called Womack a "right
winger" at least 20 different ways. <snicker>
: RH
: --
: _________________________________________________________
: "The moment a mere numerical superiority by either states or voters
: in this country proceeds to ignore the needs and desires of the minority,
: and for their own selfish purpose or advancement, hamper or oppress
: that minority, or debar them in any way from equal privileges and
: equal rights--that moment will mark the failure of our
: constitutional system."
:
: Franklin D. Roosevelt Radio Broadcast: Oct 26, 1939
: _________________________________________________________
William R. Discipio Jr
: You were the fool who decided to bring up this line of reasoning. If
: you're going to ride that particular bus, you're going to have to pay
: the fee.
Are you sending him to the back of the bus too, Hanson?
: But then, that's right. The GOP is never guilty of any sin.
No, no, you have told us many times that the GOP has committed TREASON.
They aren't guilty of any sin, they are TREASONOUS.
: Hypocrite.
Precisely.
: RH
Paul Angus Sullivan
owners to renters favors owners. At no time in American history is the ratio of renters
to owners higher. At one time most families owned, now most families rent. For the
truth please see http://ezmail.net/detax/
If you read it and understand it then please R.S.V.P.
Yours for truth,
PAS
Brian Carey
:
: : Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
:
: Jimmy, how badly *DID* my ISP slap you for your continued harassment?
Did this really happen? Not that I'd be surprised...
--
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: What's the matter, Bill? Do the facts that Mr. Discipio presents
: offend your deceitful liberal nonsensibilities?
Why don't you point out some "facts" that Willie the Wacko has posted for the
benefit of those of us who have never seen them.
: You must be new
: to the Net, else you would know that Richard Hanson is quite the
: laughingstock of the Usenet political newsgroups.
Actually, you already hold the title.
--
Buddy K
synergy
>In <4dpplc$7...@crl6.crl.com> disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio Jr)
>writes:
>>
>>Brian Carey (car...@netaxs.com) wrote:
>>
>>: I got a laugh from the message in which he (Rich Hanson) stated that
>Bob
>>: Dole wants to pass legislation to hand out assault weapons.
>>
>>Read Hanson a little bit longer. You will find that his Dole comment
>>pales in comparison to most of the reactionary hyperbole he spews.
>>
>>Take a quick search for a post from "womack" where Hanson is handed
>his
>>proverbial head on a silver platter. Look for Hanson's absolutely
>>ludicrous response.
>And make sure you check out the comment about the OKC building being a
>Federal Kindergarten. My "opponent" so successfully trashed me that he
>hasn't replied yet.
Keep on whimpering and whining, Richie. Let the world know what
a pathetic little loser you really are. Mr. Womack cleaned your
clock and there's not a damn thing yu can do about it except squirm.
William R. Discipio Jr
: Please provide proof of my clock being cleaned.
: I'd love to see the quotes on this.
You have. Search for Womack's response to you and your amazingly
reactionary response.
: Or do you just read Discipio's ravings and put the big DITTO on them
: like the little Limbot you seem to be?
Ah, is Limbaugh at the center of your Grand Unification Theory, too?
: This Womack must be some sort of internet godling to you two girls.
I'm not surprised by your misogyny, either.
: Apparently he defeats his opponents by failing to reply to criticism.
Yeah, apparently. <snicker>
: I'm terribly impressed.
Bill Whitehouse
Jr) wrote:
>
> Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>
> : You were the fool who decided to bring up this line of reasoning. If
> : you're going to ride that particular bus, you're going to have to pay
> : the fee.
>
> Are you sending him to the back of the bus too, Hanson?
That's it, Discipio - milk those clever little semantic twists
regardless of the fact that you've said nothing.
Funnily enough, it was those liberal wackos that fought against
segregation in the South. Dissed your own good 'ol boy philosophy,
there - congrats.
Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Bill Whitehouse
: synergy (syn...@MCS.COM) wrote:
:
: What's the matter, Bill? Do the facts that Mr. Discipio presents
: offend your deceitful liberal nonsensibilities?
A bit of advice: if you're going to try to bait someone, try not
doing it in such a transparent and inept manner. Makes you look as
desperately on-the-ropes as Discipio.
The only facts that Discipio presents in his postings is his
inability to recognize that his hardassed dogmatism only serves
to expose his essentially fascistic worldview and his sadly
misguided belief in the projection of his own faults on others
as an effective bluff. He might as well just admit he's a closet
social fascist and drop the P.C. pretenses to the contrary (that
he actually believes others have the right to adopt viewpoints
different from his own) - he'll at least then have a consistent,
if still a losing, viewpoint to base an argument on.
And offense? You vastly overestimate him. His (and yours)
sophomoric attempts to push reactive buttons are momentarily
amusing, but ultimately irrelevent.
Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Richard Hanson
<andS...@The.Statists> writes:
>rha...@ix.netcom.com(Richard Hanson ) wrote:
>>In <4drfm4$i...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> Sneer
<and...@The.Tax.Happy>
>>writes:
>>>
>>>>Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>>>[snip]
>of the minority at the behest of a static ruling class]
>>>
>>>"The moment a minority political faction ignores the needs and
desires
>>
>>>of the political majority
>>
>>The Republican Party at the dawning of the New Right.
>
were
>elected by a fluke celestial alignment which allowed a tiny sliver of
the
>electorate to broom the Dems into the political dustbin.
>
>> and for their own selfish purpose or advancement,
>>>lawful privileges and rights
>>
>>The Republican Congress for the last forty years.
>
>By this, I suppose you are suggesting that the Repubs should have
abrogated
>their role as the opposition party and allowed the Dems to do unto the
>American people unchallenged?
You were the fool who decided to bring up this line of reasoning. If
you're going to ride that particular bus, you're going to have to pay
the fee.
But then, that's right. The GOP is never guilty of any sin. Even
though they've been up to their noses in the government trough for as
many years as they accuse the Democrats of, the GOP has never even
taken a taste, right?
Hypocrite.
RH
William R. Discipio Jr
: : synergy (syn...@MCS.COM) wrote:
: :
: : What's the matter, Bill? Do the facts that Mr. Discipio presents
: : offend your deceitful liberal nonsensibilities?
: A bit of advice: if you're going to try to bait someone, try not
: doing it in such a transparent and inept manner. Makes you look as
: desperately on-the-ropes as Discipio.
You suffer from the same delusions that Hanson does.
: The only facts that Discipio presents in his postings is his
: inability to recognize that his hardassed dogmatism only serves
: to expose his essentially fascistic worldview and his sadly
: misguided belief in the projection of his own faults on others
: as an effective bluff.
Wow! All in one breath! Billy-boy, certainly you can argue points rather
than simply hurl invective. Take any one of my "hardassed domgatic
fascistic worldviews" and debate me on it. Are you man enough?
: He might as well just admit he's a closet
: social fascist and drop the P.C. pretenses to the contrary (that
: he actually believes others have the right to adopt viewpoints
: different from his own) - he'll at least then have a consistent,
: if still a losing, viewpoint to base an argument on.
Whitehouse is funny. I wonder where he gets his evidence.
: And offense? You vastly overestimate him. His (and yours)
: sophomoric attempts to push reactive buttons are momentarily
: amusing, but ultimately irrelevent.
Reactive buttons! You mean like this:
Discipio Admits to Unhealthy Interest in Child Pornography!
Discipio celebrates fedworkers misery!
Discipio admits to being a child abuser!
Discipio admits to being a substance abuser!
DISCIPIO RAVES ON!!
Discipio amdits to being Didiot!!
Discipio sinking deep into twisted sexual obsession
Discipio Admits to Unhealthy Interest in Children
Whithouse, I think your on the wrong side. Geez, how deluded and
misinformed can you get.
Anyway, are you man enough to debate me?
: Bill Whitehouse whit...@ncsa.uiuc.edu
:
Sneer
>In <4drfm4$i...@newsstand.cit.cornell.edu> Sneer <and...@The.Tax.Happy>
>writes:
>>
>>>Richard Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>>[snip]
[deleted FDR's spurious distortions rationalizing tyranny
of the minority at the behest of a static ruling class]
>>
>>"The moment a minority political faction ignores the needs and desires
>
>>of the political majority
>
>The Republican Party at the dawning of the New Right.
You forgot to trot out the usual statistics 'proving' that the Repubs were
elected by a fluke celestial alignment which allowed a tiny sliver of the
electorate to broom the Dems into the political dustbin.
> and for their own selfish purpose or advancement,
>>hamper or oppress that majority, or debar them in any way from their
>>lawful privileges and rights
>
>The Republican Congress for the last forty years.
By this, I suppose you are suggesting that the Repubs should have abrogated
their role as the opposition party and allowed the Dems to do unto the
American people unchallenged? You will, of course, be consistent by imploring
the Dems to cease their current obstructionist tactics.
>--that moment will mark the arrival of
>>tyranny and is the usual cause of political discontent in a nation."
>> --Sneer Usenet Broadcast: Now
>
>Couldn't agree with you more.
>
>rH
Sneer
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4dsepq$g...@crl7.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio: > : You were the fool who decided to bring up this line of reasoning. If
: > : you're going to ride that particular bus, you're going to have to pay
: > : the fee.
: > Are you sending him to the back of the bus too, Hanson?
: That's it, Discipio - milk those clever little semantic twists
: regardless of the fact that you've said nothing.
Here is Bill Whitehouse. Surely he recognizes he is a hypocrite.
C'mon Billy-boy. Let's hear another good rant. You are good at it. Really.
: Funnily enough, it was those liberal wackos that fought against
: segregation in the South.
Who Hanson? Kennemur? You must be joking.
: Dissed your own good 'ol boy philosophy,
: there - congrats.
Keep telling yourself that. The only "Good O' Boys I know of are at the
BATF. They are constatnly being defended by the likes of Hanson and
Whitehouse.
R.Hanson
>
>rha...@ix.netcom.com(Richard Hanson ) writes:
>
Jr)
>>writes:
>>>
>>>Brian Carey (car...@netaxs.com) wrote:
>>>
>>>: I got a laugh from the message in which he (Rich Hanson) stated
that
>>Bob
>>>: Dole wants to pass legislation to hand out assault weapons.
>>>
>>>Read Hanson a little bit longer. You will find that his Dole
comment
>>>pales in comparison to most of the reactionary hyperbole he spews.
>>>
>>>Take a quick search for a post from "womack" where Hanson is handed
>>his
>>>proverbial head on a silver platter. Look for Hanson's absolutely
>>>ludicrous response.
>
>>And make sure you check out the comment about the OKC building being
a
>>Federal Kindergarten. My "opponent" so successfully trashed me that
he
>>hasn't replied yet.
>
>Keep on whimpering and whining, Richie. Let the world know what
>a pathetic little loser you really are. Mr. Womack cleaned your
>clock and there's not a damn thing yu can do about it except squirm.
Please provide proof of my clock being cleaned.
I'd love to see the quotes on this.
Or do you just read Discipio's ravings and put the big DITTO on them
like the little Limbot you seem to be?
This Womack must be some sort of internet godling to you two girls.
Apparently he defeats his opponents by failing to reply to criticism.
I'm terribly impressed.
RH
--
_________________________________________________________
"The moment a mere numerical superiority by either states or voters
in this country proceeds to ignore the needs and desires of the minority,
and for their own selfish purpose or advancement, hamper or oppress
Hanson
(Bill Whitehouse) writes:
>
>
>: synergy (syn...@MCS.COM) wrote:
>:
>: What's the matter, Bill? Do the facts that Mr. Discipio presents
>: offend your deceitful liberal nonsensibilities?
>
>A bit of advice: if you're going to try to bait someone, try not
>doing it in such a transparent and inept manner. Makes you look as
>desperately on-the-ropes as Discipio.
>
>inability to recognize that his hardassed dogmatism only serves
>to expose his essentially fascistic worldview and his sadly
>misguided belief in the projection of his own faults on others
>social fascist and drop the P.C. pretenses to the contrary (that
>he actually believes others have the right to adopt viewpoints
>different from his own) - he'll at least then have a consistent,
>if still a losing, viewpoint to base an argument on.
>
>sophomoric attempts to push reactive buttons are momentarily
>amusing, but ultimately irrelevent.
Well said.
You seem to have nailed Mr. Discipio on the head. I've also noted
after a few weeks of experimentation, that Discipio is himself rather
easy to bait.
William R. Discipio Jr
: I find that most Momma's Boys are easy to bait and slow to make any
: sense much less points in a discussion.
Yeah, look what one mama's boy named Jim Kennemur had to fabricate
because he can't take the heat. Is Kennemur so without intelligence that
he doesn't understand the following is simply bigoted smear and not
'discussion'? Are all self proclaimed liberals this dishonest?
Jim Kennemur wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
netcom23% finger disc...@crl.com
Login: discipio Name: William Discipio
Directory: u/uu/discipio Shell: /usr/local/bin/ah
No Mail.
Plan: I hope to despoil as many 10 year old boys as I
possibly can. That's why I live in California where they
grow young and sweet.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Voltaire
synergy
>R.Hanson (rha...@ix.netcom.com) wrote:
>: Please provide proof of my clock being cleaned.
>: I'd love to see the quotes on this.
>You have. Search for Womack's response to you and your amazingly
>reactionary response.
>: Or do you just read Discipio's ravings and put the big DITTO on them
>: like the little Limbot you seem to be?
>Ah, is Limbaugh at the center of your Grand Unification Theory, too?
>: This Womack must be some sort of internet godling to you two girls.
>I'm not surprised by your misogyny, either.
>
>: Apparently he defeats his opponents by failing to reply to criticism.
>Yeah, apparently. <snicker>
>: I'm terribly impressed.
Poor, wimpy, cowardly little Richie...
(S)he can't help but wimp out!
Richie Hanson is not only brain-damaged, but sexually confused!
Poor little Richie...
--
Shel
>Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
>They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
>they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
>one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
>January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
>is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
>to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
>Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
>activity is "chickenshit."
I happen to resent that! I like chickens. Come on Voltaire, be fair to
chickens. Just "shit" will do.
/\ /\
/ \/\/\/ \
/ '' \
/ shel \
/ oz. \
MmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmM
the secret of self-worth
is to lower your expectations
until they're already met.
MmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmM
Voltaire
I find that most Momma's Boys are easy to bait and slow to make any
sense much less points in a discussion.
Voltaire
zippy
Discipio Jr) wrote:
> Richard Hanson: liar, hypocrite, smear artist, shill. Will you add any
> more?
>
> Richie, you still haven't told us which congressional office you are
> posting from.
>
> : RH
> --
> crl23% finger volt...@chelsea.ios.com
> Login: voltai29 Name: Jim KennemurXAXX
> Directory: /u/u9/voltai29 Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
> No Mail.
If RH us a liar, hypoctite, smear artist and shill then he must
be posting from Newt Gingrich's office.
--
George Uhl
The opinions expressed here are mine and only mine, not MITRE's.
William R. Discipio Jr
: In article <4dnb5e$e...@crl3.crl.com>, disc...@crl.com (William R.
: Discipio Jr) wrote:
: > Richard Hanson: liar, hypocrite, smear artist, shill. Will you add any
: > more?
: >
: > Richie, you still haven't told us which congressional office you are
: > posting from.
: >
: > : RH
: > --
: > crl23% finger volt...@chelsea.ios.com
: > Login: voltai29 Name: Jim KennemurXAXX
: > Directory: /u/u9/voltai29 Shell: /usr/local/bin/tcsh
: > No Mail.
: If RH us a liar, hypoctite, smear artist and shill then he must
: be posting from Newt Gingrich's office.
Notice how he has been missing for a day or two? I think he's one of
Klinton's minions. They do seem to have the same integrity.
: --
: George Uhl
: The opinions expressed here are mine and only mine, not MITRE's.
William R. Discipio Jr
: volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire) wrote:
: >Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
: >They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
: >they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
: >one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
: >January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
: >is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
: >to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
: >Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
: >activity is "chickenshit."
: I happen to resent that! I like chickens. Come on Voltaire, be fair to
: chickens. Just "shit" will do.
One sees that Shel-head is beyond ad hominem. That's nice.
: /\ /\
: / \/\/\/ \
: / '' \
: / shel \
: / oz. \
: MmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmM
: the secret of self-worth
: is to lower your expectations
: until they're already met.
: MmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmMmM
--
William R. Discipio Jr
: I guess the local sheriff lost the subpena he was going to serve for
: my crimes that were cooked up in the heads of the Netscabs.
Kennemur, your killfile is leaking.
: I hope
: they keep it up until spring. I have a flower bed full of bluebonnets
: that need fertilizing.
You want me to keep it up until spring? No problem, your finger output
will remain until spring. I aim to please.
: Voltaire
Mr. Sam
>I guess the local sheriff lost the subpena he was going to serve for
>my crimes that were cooked up in the heads of the Netscabs.
Calm down, Volty. Keep your paranoia under control, please. The only 'crime'
you are being accused off is stupidity. If that's a crime now, most of the
liberal would already be in jail.
> I hope
>they keep it up until spring. I have a flower bed full of bluebonnets
>that need fertilizing.
What's a matter? Your own shit isn't good enough?
--
Mr. Sam: member, talk.politics.misc troll patrol.
_____________________________________________________________________________
"Government is not a solution to our | "First of all, keep in mind that most
problem, government IS the problem." | of our problem is with working
-- R. Reagan. | Americans." -- B. Clinton.
_____________________________________|_______________________________________
Voltaire
wrote:
>In <30fc71c...@198.4.75.50> volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire)
>writes:
>>Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
>>They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
>>they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
>>one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
>>January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
>>is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
>>to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
>>Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
>>activity is "chickenshit."
>
>I think that's what keeps me posting. I sort of prefer to see their
>sneering as a response rather than a preliminary position. Besides,
>since the Right Wing is 99% reaction and only 1% original ideas, at
>least they're being more honest this way.
>
I guess the local sheriff lost the subpena he was going to serve for
my crimes that were cooked up in the heads of the Netscabs. I hope
they keep it up until spring. I have a flower bed full of bluebonnets
that need fertilizing.
Voltaire
William R. Discipio Jr
: BINGO! I keep wondering when this particular knee is going to quit
: jerking. So far, no signs of anything like an original comment, all
: pure reactions.
And Hanson must obviously confuse his response for 'original comment.'
What a hypocrite.
: RH
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: On 21 Jan 1996 23:56:22 GMT, rha...@ix.netcom.com(Hanson ) wrote:
: I find that most Momma's Boys are easy to bait and slow to make any
: sense much less points in a discussion.
Sometime I think we should all be ashamed of ourselves for taking the easy shots
instead of debating those on the right who know how to make a coherent argument.
Baiting "Megadittos" Discipio is about as sporting as fishing for hatchery trout.
--
Buddy K
William R. Discipio Jr
<snicker> Yeah, let's see what Kennemur *really* thinks about Kilpatrick...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: Re: STEVE KANGAS, IGNORE THIS. YOU HAVE A LIFE!
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 1996 02:02:53 GMT
Organization: Internet Online Services
Lines: 38
Message-ID: <30fda91d...@198.4.75.50>
References: <4dgvee$v...@portal.gmu.edu>
Reply-To: volt...@chelsea.ios.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-30.ts-1.hou.idt.net
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99d/32.168
Xref: nntp.crl.com alt.politics.usa.congress:25126 alt.politics.democrats.d:64454 alt.politics.usa.republican:182536 alt.politics.libertarian:161953 talk.politics.libertarian:83368 alt.politics.usa.misc:65258 alt.activism:128778 alt.politics.radical-left:
87278 talk.politics.misc:333839 alt.politics.clinton:221820 alt.politics:6105
On 16 Jan 1996 19:48:30 GMT, hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu (HENRY E.
KILPATRICK JR.) wrote:
>J. Dean (wag...@pixi.com) wrote:
>: volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire) wrote:
>
>: >J. Dean is a...
>
>: >(A) Right Wing Loon who wants to teach economics.
>
>: >(B) Right Wing loon who once got an Intro To Economics exam back.
>
>: >(C) Right Wing Loon Who is under the delusion that he can give exams
>: >to the rest of us.
>
>: >(D) All of the Above.
>
>: Answer (E) An unbiased student of Economics who believes that the govt
>: is not the solution to every problem, and if a govt policy sounds too
>: go to be true, it is. He also is a firm believer of a free market and
>: capitalism.
>
>In other words a very biased "insipid, pedantic, leather-tongued oracle of
>the ordinary bourgeois intellegence of the 19th century."
>
>I won't tell you where this came from. You claim to know some economics
>- look it up.
>
>You are far from being unbiased.
And you are far from intellectual and still seem to be incapable of
turning off your full header command. I never claimed anything. You
know I know a bit about the dismal science from all the times I have
kicked your rather wimpy butt in economics threads. You appear to not
only be a Netscab but a slow learner as well.
Voltaire
: --
: Buddy K
Shel
>Shel (she...@ois.com.au) wrote:
>: volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire) wrote:
>: >Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
>: >They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
>: >they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
>: >one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
>: >January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
>: >is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
>: >to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
>: >Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
>: >activity is "chickenshit."
>: I happen to resent that! I like chickens. Come on Voltaire, be fair to
>: chickens. Just "shit" will do.
>One sees that Shel-head is beyond ad hominem. That's nice.
To all the chickens offended by my ad hominem toward them, I
apologise.
Mr. Sam
'shit' is not something that chickens would find offensive. The ones who
should be offended are left-wing extremist, because of the shining example of
intelligent discourse you make them look like.
--
Mr. Sam: member, talk.politics.misc troll patrol
channel operator, #Sci-Fi - Undernet IRC sci-fi/fantasy channel
http://www.cyberstorm.com/~rockd/sci-fi.html
Voltaire
>disc...@crl.com (William R. Discipio Jr) wrote:
>
>>Shel (she...@ois.com.au) wrote:
>>: volt...@chelsea.ios.com (Voltaire) wrote:
>
>>: >Richard, I keep waiting for some sort of follow up from the netscabs.
>>: >They all moan and groan and threaten in these areas but in the end
>>: >they are all just sneer and bullshit. Typical bullies. I haven't read
>>: >one of their posts or answered one of their deluded messages since
>>: >January 2. I see their threats and chest pounding second hand and it
>>: >is really funny. They appear to still be all hot air and bluff. Come
>>: >to think of it, that pretty much describes their inane posts as well.
>>: >Here in Texas, I believe the phrase used to describe that sort of
>>: >activity is "chickenshit."
>
>>: I happen to resent that! I like chickens. Come on Voltaire, be fair to
>>: chickens. Just "shit" will do.
>
>>One sees that Shel-head is beyond ad hominem. That's nice.
>
>To all the chickens offended by my ad hominem toward them, I
>apologise.
>
There is still the possibility that shit was offended as well.
Voltaire
William R. Discipio Jr
: mr...@soho.ios.com (Mr. Sam) wrote:
: >'shit' is not something that chickens would find offensive. The ones who
: >should be offended are left-wing extremist, because of the shining example of
: >intelligent discourse you make them look like.
: Right...? So if I make "them" look like a "shining example of
: intelligent discourse", why the fuck should they be offended? The
: logic is hidden, no?
Ooooh Shel, I love it when you talk dirty!
William R. Discipio Jr
: Hooked the village idiot again. Damn. Can't keep these trash fish off my line.
Buddy, next will you tell us ANY economist can win a Nobel prize?
: --
: Buddy K
Shel
HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR.
: HENRY E. KILPATRICK JR. (hkil...@osf1.gmu.edu) wrote:
: : Voltaire (volt...@chelsea.ios.com) wrote:
: : : On 21 Jan 1996 23:56:22 GMT, rha...@ix.netcom.com(Hanson ) wrote:
: : : I find that most Momma's Boys are easy to bait and slow to make any
: : : sense much less points in a discussion.
: : Sometime I think we should all be ashamed of ourselves for taking the easy shots
: : instead of debating those on the right who know how to make a coherent argument.
: : Baiting "Megadittos" Discipio is about as sporting as fishing for hatchery trout.
: <snicker> Yeah, let's see what Kennemur *really* thinks about Kilpatrick...
Hooked the village idiot again. Damn. Can't keep these trash fish off my line.
--
Buddy K
Mr. Sam
Shel
>Shel (she...@ois.com.au) wrote:
>: mr...@soho.ios.com (Mr. Sam) wrote:
>: >'shit' is not something that chickens would find offensive. The ones who
>: >should be offended are left-wing extremist, because of the shining example of
>: >intelligent discourse you make them look like.
>: Right...? So if I make "them" look like a "shining example of
>: intelligent discourse", why the fuck should they be offended? The
>: logic is hidden, no?
>Ooooh Shel, I love it when you talk dirty!
Yeah, some of us have noticed that. We operate on a roster, each
taking turns to give you a little thrill evey now and again. :}>
Shel
>In <4eirjd$d...@swing.iinet.net.au>, she...@ois.com.au (Shel) wrote:
>>mr...@soho.ios.com (Mr. Sam) wrote:
>>>'shit' is not something that chickens would find offensive. The ones who
>>>should be offended are left-wing extremist, because of the shining example of
>>>intelligent discourse you make them look like.
>>Right...? So if I make "them" look like a "shining example of
>>intelligent discourse", why the fuck should they be offended? The
>>logic is hidden, no?
>Figure it out. Look in the mirror, if you need help.
Hey, you said it, you figure it out. Doesn't make much sense, but
maybe you don't mind posting that sort of thing. And I'm not going to
waste my time trying to rectify faults in YOUR logic, that's something
you have to face on your own. And the above question still stands.
And in your case, MAYBE it is "look behind the mirror, if you need
help." You know, the one in front of your bathroom medicine-cabinet.