Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Immigration simply a "bandwagon"?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Toby Ponsenby

unread,
Sep 1, 2004, 10:19:55 AM9/1/04
to
<| Anti-Multiculty |> did write on 02Sep2004 at 3:50:20 PM
> Immigration simply a "bandwagon"?
> http://www.bnp.org.uk/news/2004_sept/news_sept1.htm
> 1st September 2004
>
> The liberal media never fail to amaze. While the hacks and editors at times
> pontificate about what they determine are the important issues of the day,
> they are quick to ensure that certain issues remain demonised and
> marginalised because those issues have been anathema to the liberal,
> politically correct minds that make up the media and governing elite. Until,
> that is, some brave soul who works within the governing elite speaks out on
> a subject. Once "academics" or "experts" or "think-tanks" have boldly broken
> a taboo subject, then amazingly it becomes respectable in the eyes of the
> liberal media and something worthy of discussion.
>
> So today we have an excellent example of just such a tactic with "The
> Guardian" suggesting that the issue of overcrowding in Britain is now being
> taken seriously by academics and cannot be left to the likes of the "British
> National Party, the UK Independence Party or the Daily Mail" to steal the
> limelight on this issue.
>
> 4 million extra people in 20 years
>
> The US based Population Reference Bureau has issued a forecast that the
> population of the UK will rise by an extra 4 million by 2025, almost
> exclusively as a result of immigration and the high birth rate expected from
> the new immigrants and this is an issue not being addressed by the New
> Labour regime who sees no upper limit to the number of immigrants. That fits
> in with the Migration Watch forecasts of about 200,000 a year, equivalent to
> a town the size of Northampton being built every 12 months.
>
> The Optimum Population Trust (OPT) whose patrons include former FoE Director
> Johnathan Porritt, wants an immigration policy of zero net immigration and
> argues that a fall in population is needed to ensure a healthy environment.
> High population densities such as those that exist in England can only be
> sustained by excessive use of non-renewable fossil fuels. Crispin Tickell,
> Director of Oxford's Green College environmental policy centre suggests that
> aid be "given to those countries where refugees originate" in a bid to
> reduce numbers migrating to Europe.
>
> "Bandwagon" insult
>
> The "Guardian" suggests that the issue is dealt with by Government and its
> numerous agencies and advisory bodies lest the "far right" jump onto the
> "bandwagon". The future of our people in this, our island homelands, is far
> too important to be trivialised by calling such an issue a "bandwagon". It
> has been the many dedicated patriots of the so-called "far right" throughout
> the post-war years that have been like voices in the wilderness; for decades
> saying what the man and woman in the street already knows yet ignored by
> successive Tory and Labour governments.
>
> However, the academics of today's reports, while they should be commended
> for bringing into the arena of public debate the issue of numbers, fail to
> address the social consequences of the changing complexion of Britain. If
> the newcomers were sons and daughters of these islands returning from
> Australia, New Zealand or the US the numbers would still be a problem, an
> extra 4 million folk, whoever they are would place an unacceptable burden on
> our already decaying infra-structure. However what the academics are afraid
> or unprepared to discuss is just who these newcomers are and what the
> consequences of 4 million extra people of a very different cultural
> background will be.
>
> So for example we have John Guillebaud, the co-chair of the OPT saying
>
> "We have nothing in common with the racists, and if there are social
> problems of immigration we don't get into that,"
>
> Rosamund McDougal, a family planning expert and another co-chair of OPT,
> argues that the race issue is "simply irrelevant".
>
> "I'd rather have 40 million people in the UK and half of them black than 100
> million all white," she says. "We can't affect the death rate - we can't go
> around shooting people. What we can do is cut down unwanted births and
> immigration that we cannot sustain."
>
> Social consequences there for all to see
>
> Why not, Mr. Guillebaud and Mrs. McDougal? You have have let the genie out
> of the bottle regarding the numbers, do you really think you can now stay
> silent on the issue of the social consequences? It doesn't require a PhD in
> environmental economics or social studies to realise what the consequences
> will be. The impact of a huge flood of immigrants from North Africa, the
> Middle East and the Indian sub-continent is clear for all to see, our major
> cities, our county towns and indeed some of our smaller settlements are
> already reeling from the social consequences of large scale migration.
> Schoolchildren in villages along the M62 corridor experience the
> consequences daily, pensioners in once prosperous seaside resorts along the
> coasts of Kent and Essex witness the consequences daily.
>
> When the academics and think-tanks are ready to tackle that taboo subject,
> they can maybe, just maybe, entrusted with devising effective policy. In the
> meantime, they should nod silently to those of us who have been demonised by
> the media and who have risked ostracism, job sackings, financial ruin,
> family break-ups simply because we have spoken out boldly and determinedly
> about both the numbers and the cultural and social impact of immigration.

Oh shit oh dear...another one....
Just for a few days, we'll maybe trust you to provide a precis of these
interminable 'stories' if you're kind enough to supply the link as you
already do.
--
Toby
quidquid latine dictum
sit, altum viditur

sam fisher

unread,
Sep 1, 2004, 1:17:29 PM9/1/04
to
let me guess....solution to overpopulation by the "primitive"races:
gaschambers?! hmm deja vu, right?!

"Toby Ponsenby" <to...@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:nibbo5nlsuaf$.dlg@ID-136740.user.uni-berlin.de...

The Enlightenment

unread,
Sep 1, 2004, 6:19:34 PM9/1/04
to
Toby Ponsenby <to...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<nibbo5nlsuaf$.d...@ID-136740.user.uni-berlin.de>...

Did you pause to think before putting foot in mouth that your very
post with its arrogence, snideness and rhetoric actualy confirms
anti-multiculty's post?

Toby Ponsenby

unread,
Sep 1, 2004, 7:54:23 PM9/1/04
to
<| The Enlightenment |> did write on 02Sep2004 at 8:19:34 AM

>> Oh shit oh dear...another one....
>> Just for a few days, we'll maybe trust you to provide a precis of these
>> interminable 'stories' if you're kind enough to supply the link as you
>> already do.
>
> Did you pause to think before putting foot in mouth that your very
> post with its arrogence, snideness and rhetoric actualy confirms
> anti-multiculty's post?

Huh?

XtremeHOHA

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 10:46:54 AM9/2/04
to

"Anti-Multiculty" <Antimult...@hotmaiil.com> wrote in message
news:010904...@hotmaiil.com...
> --
> JimB
> http://www.antimulticulture.0catch.com
> Union Against Multi-Culty
>
> "Abolish Multiculturalism and String Up The Traitors"

Some reasonable. And some unreasonable.

The unreasonable is social engineering on a global scale. Multiculturalism and multi-
lingual nations, invaded by immigrants (mostly the diseased, arrogant, ignorant.....etc...
Never a physicist, biologist, doctor, and always black and brown.) They destroy the host
country from within. Krushev was right. "America will destroy herself from within." Christ
Jesus.....was Nikita right or what....? Look at America. It's becoming a third world sewer.

The traitors are those who put into place political correctness and uncontrolled diversity.
All branches of the military are now politically correct and diverse. Ruination from what
it was intended. To kill and break things. Like WWII. Bombing churches, schools, factories.
On both sides. Anything in the line of fire, to get the frickin job done. Now their hands are
tied from doing their job. No civilian deaths. No Mosques blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda.

Why don't the Marines take over Mosques with only the 'owner' inside with them. Then the
Marines could fight the wild asses from the Mosques.

We lose to the rabid wild asses if restraint continues to happen. Get ready to be fitted
for a Turban and/or a Burka. We will attend the new "USAma Mosque" built on the
former Trade Tower site.

Thanks to the policies of the socialist liberals. We can call the U.S. the "great melting
pot." A pot of melting cultures. More keep getting thrown into the pot so it never finally
melds. More and more diversity until it over flows. When it all should meld into one.
The one that was first into the pot. The one that threw itself into the pot. Because of
a Trojan Horse called the Statue of Liberty. From a country that now hates the country
they gave it to.

I say; take it apart and send it back. Put up a tall symbolic tower in its place, with a
huge sign of blinking red lights, reading; "Closed. Tresspassers will be shot."

Do the same at the MeXican border. But with a wall, or a fence, or both. The entire
length of the border.

Vote me for president in November. Just write me in. And a Mosque will have no
chance on the Trade Tower site. Because the borders will be secured and every
illegal, and suspect terrorist, of any persuasion, will be rounded up, checked out,
and thrown the hell out if they don't belong. You know they won't be coming back
because the borders are secure. National Guard will take control. They will do what
their 'title' states. Guarding the nation from within the Nation it is guarding.

~>
Twonky......

Aquarius.....the dawning of the age of......enlightenment....

"You get a lot more than you bargain for....."

Kiddush Ha-Shem/HaShem/Hashem......YAHU.....the New Jerusalem.....
.
(Fuhk Allah. A Supreme piece of schit. Like a Supreme Judge who sits
on the throne of the Supreme Court.)

"Will the real Almighty God please 'stand' up?" It's a no brainer.....really...

I am....
A humanlike hybrid of HaShem Almighty. Bred thru Cain & wife....

A hybrid is not....
An evolved, nor a mutated apelike human, being deluded in assertive illusions
and theories, in the duplicity of the elite ruling Apes.

Genetics. The stuff of Almighty God, and the miXed up stuffing of mankind.

Reality bites.......into fruitcakes... CHOMP......

The truth hurts the delusional, illusionary, apelike humans....OUCH.....

Armageddon......Natasha-like humans of the world. Who can walk upright.
But have no reasoning power, nor the intelligence to learn. All you do is react.

adrian

unread,
Sep 2, 2004, 11:53:25 AM9/2/04
to
IMMIGRATION IS GERRYMANDERING immigrants vote Labour like others in
free council houses who don't work,

Gary O'Donovan

unread,
Sep 11, 2004, 11:49:51 AM9/11/04
to
Toby Ponsenby <to...@privacy.net> wrote in message news:<hmfonh5scd7a$.d...@ID-136740.user.uni-berlin.de>...

> <| The Enlightenment |> did write on 02Sep2004 at 8:19:34 AM
> >> Oh shit oh dear...another one....
> >> Just for a few days, we'll maybe trust you to provide a precis of these
> >> interminable 'stories' if you're kind enough to supply the link as you
> >> already do.
> >
> > Did you pause to think before putting foot in mouth that your very
> > post with its arrogence, snideness and rhetoric actualy confirms
> > anti-multiculty's post?
>
> Huh?

DONT VOTE FOR ALP YOU WILL REPENT http://noalp.blogspot.com/

David Segall

unread,
Sep 11, 2004, 12:30:05 PM9/11/04
to

Does anybody have a rule for a any news client that will automatically
delete a mass posting of news group messages?

Anti-Multiculty

unread,
Sep 13, 2004, 12:31:23 AM9/13/04
to
Exactly LOL

>Toby Ponsenby" <to...@privacy.net> wrote in message;


> > Did you pause to think before putting foot in mouth that your very
> > post with its arrogence, snideness and rhetoric actualy confirms
> > anti-multiculty's post?
>
> Huh?

--

0 new messages