Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

America-hating "Dickzi Chicks" Cry Phony Tears on TV. Stinking Hanoi Jane Fonda's of C&W Music!

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Johnny Hallyday

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 3:23:26 PM4/23/03
to
http://www.drudgereport.com/dixie.htm

These lying phony anti-American skanks! Look at the picture - they
are dressed like prostitutes. If the slutty clothes fit the fat hogs
then....

What a bunch of fake tears & apologies. A lot of people cannot
stomach these Hanoi Jane Fonda's of Country Music.

topcat

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 3:38:32 PM4/23/03
to

"Johnny Hallyday" <johnnyha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:256ae7ce.0304...@posting.google.com...


We can't let them get away with it. Protest their concerts. Make Natalie
Maines say the same thing to a Texas crowd. Give the crowd "D" batteries
first.

TC


Sam Fisher

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 3:47:27 PM4/23/03
to
they should just move to China.

"Johnny Hallyday" <johnnyha...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:256ae7ce.0304...@posting.google.com...

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 3:58:03 PM4/23/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b86q8r$sou$1...@news.monmouth.com...

Bush is probably thought less of by Texans than by most others. In the first
place he is NOT a Texan. He probably wishes he was, but he's just a
pretender.

The Dixie Chicks would probably get a standing ovation for speaking what
most of us feel.

Shepherd

StrawMan

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 6:02:32 PM4/23/03
to
What a shallow brain is so amused with such stupid shit.
Get a Life


--
The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's
profitable to continue the illusion.


Non-republicrat Voter

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:09:46 PM4/23/03
to
On 23 Apr 2003, Johnny Hallyday wrote:


> What a bunch of fake tears & apologies. A lot of people cannot
> stomach these Hanoi Jane Fonda's of Country Music.

I would love to love these dolls, but country music really sucks.


topcat

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:16:00 PM4/23/03
to

"StrawMan" <ro...@gamebox.net> wrote in message
news:RiCpa.87$Vd.8...@news.uswest.net...

> What a shallow brain is so amused with such stupid shit.
> Get a Life
>

You write this after all the stupid leftist bullshit propaganda you post?

TC


topcat

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:17:03 PM4/23/03
to

Shepherd wrote:
>
> Bush is probably thought less of by Texans than by most others. In the
first
> place he is NOT a Texan. He probably wishes he was, but he's just a
> pretender.
>
> The Dixie Chicks would probably get a standing ovation for speaking what
> most of us feel.
>

Yeah, yeah, that's why he was such a popular Governor there. You liberals
will lie about anything.

TC


Shepherd

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:46:01 PM4/23/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b86shc$mf$1...@news.monmouth.com...


Say after me.

"That was then, this is now"

Got it? Good! Remember it in 2004.

Shepherd


The Curmudgeon

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:53:20 PM4/23/03
to
President Bush might have a slightly lower approval rating in Taxes than the
rest of the country, but only slightly.

The d skanks would probably get a standing ovation most anywhere because
their entire audience would be left wingers like you.

"Shepherd" <sticksnorstones@.att.net> wrote in message
news:ffCpa.76012$ja4.5...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...


>
> "topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
> news:b86q8r$sou$1...@news.monmouth.com...
>

topcat

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 4:51:14 PM4/23/03
to

"Shepherd wrote:
> >
> > Yeah, yeah, that's why he was such a popular Governor there. You
liberals
> > will lie about anything.
> >
> > TC
>
>
> Say after me.
>
> "That was then, this is now"
>
> Got it? Good! Remember it in 2004.
>

So you think Bush won't carry Texas in 2004, Mr Shep? Is that your position,
because I want archive this post for after the election.

TC


tcc-1

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 5:58:18 PM4/23/03
to
they are making lots of money dude.....are you?

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b86sfd$md$1...@news.monmouth.com...

StrawMan

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 8:01:25 PM4/23/03
to
Conservitive propaganda
Get that right.

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 7:17:15 PM4/23/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b86uhp$1m7$1...@news.monmouth.com...

In 2000 Bush had no National record to hinder him and he couldn't even get
50% of the votes. In the 2004 election he will have a very dismal National
record hurting his chances of re-election.

Heard on TV news today that some states may not even carry his name on their
2004 ballot. I have doubts about that, but your Bush is not nearly as
popular as you are lead to believe.

My God! I discussing a soon to be has-been President with a has-been comic
book character.

Shepherd

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 7:20:09 PM4/23/03
to

"The Curmudgeon" <gro...@fart.com> wrote in message
news:AY-dnW612qL...@giganews.com...

Just goes to show you. Liberals have damn good taste.

Shepherd


Ninure Saunders

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 7:46:07 PM4/23/03
to
In article <j5Cpa.584903$3D1.323283@sccrnsc01>, "Sam Fisher"
<sam0f...@yahooooo.com> wrote:

-they should just move to China.
Central Services

by Charley Hardman


Talk to many Americans about the war in Iraq, and you'll hear that the US
military went there to defend our freedom. As absurd as that is (to those
able to look past the day after tomorrow), it seems that the most recent,
and perhaps final, spin claims quite a further proposition: We went to
Iraq to free the Iraqi people.

It is rank jealousy I feel when I hear that the world's most powerful
military was unleashed to free somebody else, especially when I've been
paying through the nose for it. Can't help wondering which military will
free me from the enslavement of the federal government.

"Baloney," says proud citizen #24. "If it's so bad here then leave."

I've heard exactly that from two relatives this month. They would have a
point, except that this is my country, not the federal government's. If
the federal government and its moronic minions want to turn this into the
USSA without even the decency to amend the supreme law of the land, it is
they who should leave, stand down, or, at worst, allow the return of
something which resembles a level of personal invasion consistent with the
Constitution ­ that hallowed nothingness which every senator,
representative, and president has sworn to uphold, yet, almost without
exception, violates regularly. I know of only one member of the federal
government who honors the oath consistently.

"Who's that?" weary family member #5 asks as we nibble hors d'oeuvres
before Easter dinner, her eyes bobbing left and right plotting a getaway
path from the mad paleo conversation killer.

"Congressman Ron Paul, of Texas."

"Never hoid of 'im."

To the point of consistency, why is it that the classic "America ­ Love it
or leave it" dictum is not applied to these Iraqi people we "liberated"?
Hey, Iraqi citizen: Didn't like living under a repressive dictatorship?
Then you should have left, you jerk!

"Iraq ­ Love it or leave it."

Has a ring, I think. Maybe the ruling class can turn it into a bumper
sticker down there in Pueblo, Colorado, once they've finished the latest
print runs of Preventing Holiday Shopping Headaches and, just in time for
the depression, Federal Jobs-How to Find Them and Apply Online. It's an
almost palpable pride I sense beaming from the founders down onto the boys
manning the presses there at the "Federal Citizen Information Center". Is
it coincidence that there are sections on Scams and Postal Jobs on the
same page as Federal Jobs? Thumbing through my pocket Constitution for
congress's authorization "to impose information banality."

Back to Iraq. I'm waiting, hoping to understand what logic underlies this
most recent debacle of the federal government. There's no point in
detailing the disgrace here; that's been done well by others at LRC. What
I most want to understand is the putrefying attitude of sacrifice held by
shameless suckers of the public teat. And it's not limited to feds,
military or otherwise. Talk to almost any city cop, and before long you'll
get that smarmy "doing you a favor" air. Read one of the many screeds of
resentful cops who've taken pen to paper. Soon will emit explicitly that
they are out there pounding the pavement for you, not themselves. Well
that would be marvelous were it true, but it's not. Turns out that I and
many other productive, efficient-living tax victims are the ones pounding
the pavement for society, against our will yet. And all we hear is, "you
need to give something 'back' to the community." Yeah, right.

I've never detected the slightest bit of selflessness from any pouting cop
or soldier. There is often, however, an overwhelming quality of oh too
abundant humility. Quoting Ilana Mercer quoting Golda Meir, "Don't be
humble. You're not that great." Notice to whiny "public servants": If you
don't like the job, find another. Actually, find another regardless.
Old-school Americans don't need you quite as much as you fantasize. We
don't need, contrary to a recent FAQ promulgated by the government
geniuses of terrorist survival via news.yahoo.com, to consider a
functioning radio to be our most important piece of survival gear. Why did
they? So that we can listen to the instructions of "authorities,"
otherwise we wouldn't know what to do after a disaster.

How offensive to old-school Americans is this word "authorities" in its
frequency. It's polite speak for "bureaucrats," which is a euphemism for
leech. And at the root of it all is the implied state of all those who are
not "authorities": Helpless. Dependent. Subjugated.

Is there anything about the preceding three terms which conjures images of
the men and women who founded this country ­ this grouping of formerly
independent states? America's language and behavior are tilting inevitably
to that of the former Soviet Union. And it won't be long before the
average American's reply to that is something which would have been mostly
unthinkable 40 years ago: "Well, maybe that's not such a bad thing."

Benjamin Constant, writing in 1819:


The danger of ancient liberty was that men, exclusively concerned with
securing their share of social power, might attach too little value to
individual rights and enjoyments.

The danger of modern liberty is that, absorbed in the enjoyment of our
private independence, and in the pursuit of our particular interests, we
should surrender our right to share in political power too easily.

The holders of authority are only too anxious to encourage us to do so.
They are so ready to spare us all sort of troubles, except those of
obeying and paying! They will say to us: what, in the end, is the aim of
your efforts, the motive of your labours, the object of all your hopes? Is
it not happiness? Well, leave this happiness to us and we shall give it to
you. No, Sirs, we must not leave it to them. No matter how touching such a
tender commitment may be, let us ask the authorities to keep within their
limits. Let them confine themselves to being just. We shall assume the
responsibility of being happy for ourselves.

The mythical yet eerily real marketing folk at Central Services (from the
unfortunately predictive movie Brazil) put it best with their wonderfully
helpful slogan: "You do the work, we do the pleasure."

Think about it.

I was just arguing recently about the war in Iraq with a construction
supervisor where I work. To an average, casual observer, this argument
would have appeared to be between a red-blooded, patriotic, rugged,
self-sufficient American man (construction super), and a skinny commie
pinko pacifist (me, database geek) whose only exposure to guns was pushing
daisies into a few rifle barrels in the 60s. But something happened. And
were it a movie scene, eery music would have presaged the critical moment.
In supreme aggravation after heated back and forth argument, the American
man bellowed, "The only reason you have the rights you enjoy is because
government gave them to you!"

Screech! Excuse me? Government gave me rights?

Upon further consideration, that ridiculous and terribly wrong assertion
explains just about everything, doesn't it? I looked that supposed
American man in the eye and told him very clearly that the reason I have
rights is because I was born, and that it's a concept he might want to
look into before opining on the founders, the Constitution, or any of the
other icons regularly hurled up by socialists in patriot garb ­ hurled up
until they find out they've stumbled upon a live one who really does care
about and understand those seeming conversation stoppers which actually
lie at the heart of the several United States. Still.

The time is well nigh that these modern, history-ignorant, broken,
socialist Americans with the effrontery to celebrate 4 July each year wake
up and understand something elementary: Any language which couches
government as our master, savior, benefactor, or friend is the language of
a slave and a dupe, not worthy of anyone claiming to accept the mantle
from men who stated and supported the following:


That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it
is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new
government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its
powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their
safety and happiness . . .

And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the
protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our
lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.

America ­ Deserve it or leave it. I ain't going anywhere, comrade.


April 23, 2003

Charley Hardman works with databases in Washington, DC.

=================================================================

FAIR USE NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which
has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am
making such material available in an effort to advance understanding of
environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific,
and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of
any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US
Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107

=================================================================
 

Ninure Saunders aka Rainbow Christian
http://Rainbow-Christian.tk

The Lord is my Shepherd and He knows I'm Gay
http://Ninure-Saunders.tk

My Yahoo Group
http://Ninure.tk

My Online Diary
http://www.ninure.deardiary.net
-
Universal Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Churches
http://www.MCCchurch.org

To send e-mail, remove nohate from address

Nola Daniell

unread,
Apr 23, 2003, 8:27:18 PM4/23/03
to topcat
For Pete's sake, don't ANY of you have a clue about trimming headers before you
blithely hit the 'reply' button, rec.music.country.western doesn't need all this
garbage. Please leave us out of it.

topcat

unread,
Apr 24, 2003, 9:58:21 AM4/24/03
to

Shepherd wrote:

>
> In 2000 Bush had no National record to hinder him and he couldn't even get
> 50% of the votes. In the 2004 election he will have a very dismal National
> record hurting his chances of re-election.
>
> Heard on TV news today that some states may not even carry his name on
their
> 2004 ballot. I have doubts about that, but your Bush is not nearly as
> popular as you are lead to believe.
>
> My God! I discussing a soon to be has-been President with a has-been comic
> book character.
>

First, thanks for not answering the question, about whether Bush will carry
Texas. Second, I'm going to archive this post too. Thanks for the the
post-election ammunition.

TC - a classic *cartoon* character, not comic book (as far as I'm aware)


topcat

unread,
Apr 24, 2003, 9:59:30 AM4/24/03
to

"Nola Daniell" <ndan...@wn.com.au> wrote in message
news:3EA72F66...@wn.com.au...

> For Pete's sake, don't ANY of you have a clue about trimming headers
before you
> blithely hit the 'reply' button, rec.music.country.western doesn't need
all this
> garbage. Please leave us out of it.
>

Why are YOU posting in OUR group?

TC


Nola Daniell

unread,
Apr 24, 2003, 10:39:00 PM4/24/03
to topcat
Because obviously I don't know which of the multiple NG's that this was sent to,
is yours. Duh. If you would like to tell me I would trim the other headers.
And how, pray tell, can I speak to you if I don't post to YOUR NG?

Fungusamongus

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 2:51:10 AM4/25/03
to
>>Heard on TV news today that some states may not
>>even carry his name on their 2004 ballot. I have doubts
>>about that, but your Bush is not nearly as popular as you
>>are lead to believe.

You have doubts about that? Wow, that's great. No serious news outlet would
report that the almost-certain candidate of one of the two largest political
parties in the USA will be barred from the ballot in any state. The above
statement alone entirely torpedoes your credibility.

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 10:07:17 AM4/25/03
to

"Fungusamongus" <conc...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:yV4qa.613592$L1.174679@sccrnsc02...

Think my credibility has been torpedoed for stating the truth? Check out
Alabama's debate about allowing the Burning Bush to be on their ballot. You
wont like it!

Shepherd


FFBSensei

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 10:28:57 AM4/25/03
to
Actually, he is right in this particular instance. The state is
Alabama. The reason is that the RNC has a strategy of holding off
their primaries until very late in the season (not sure of their
rationale).

Alabama is currently set to hold their primaries on September 5th.
Alabama has a state law that says the candidates' names have to be
submitted bhy September 2nd. So, if all things stay the same...Bush
COULD end up being a write-in candidate.

The Alabama Republican party is trying to revise the law to push back
the date to allow the winner of the Republican primary to be put on
the ballot. The democrat-controlled congress may drag their feet on
the issue to make it difficult for Bush. Probably not going to happen
since Bush carried Alabama the last time...but you never know.


"Fungusamongus" <conc...@juno.com> wrote in message news:<yV4qa.613592$L1.174679@sccrnsc02>...

topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 10:44:34 AM4/25/03
to

"Nola Daniell" <ndan...@wn.com.au> wrote in message
news:3EA89FC4...@wn.com.au...

> Because obviously I don't know which of the multiple NG's that this was
sent to,
> is yours. Duh. If you would like to tell me I would trim the other
headers.
> And how, pray tell, can I speak to you if I don't post to YOUR NG?

Try email, it won't work, but you could try.

You do realize that most newsreaders have settings so that you can ignore
certain threads and not be bothered by riff-raff like me, right? It's quite
clever really, you might want to look into it.

HTH, HAND

TC - Naked or Not the Dispy Chicks SUCK!


Jim

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 11:07:29 AM4/25/03
to
"Shepherd" <sticksnorstones@.att.net> wrote in message news:<%9Fpa.76254$ja4.5...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

> Heard on TV news today that some states may not even carry his name on their
> 2004 ballot. I have doubts about that, but your Bush is not nearly as
> popular as you are lead to believe.

Jeez, can ANYONE spin a tale into a bigger lie than that?

Jim

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 11:49:20 AM4/25/03
to

"Jim" <somd_j...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1a9cb195.0304...@posting.google.com...

The truth bothers you, doesn't it? Well, get plenty of antacid tablets on
hand because as the election year begins and progresses, you will see just
how unpopular Bush really is.

Shepherd


DC Eaton

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 2:38:19 PM4/25/03
to
Funny that the Chicks didn't suck until people found out they had any
opinions about anything at all, except gowns, guys and hairspray.

Springsteen is right about the McCarthy-esque vapors in the air,
regardless of what some say. But what a waste of typing....

Dean

about"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message news:<b8bhtg$gim$1...@news.monmouth.com>...

topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 2:47:52 PM4/25/03
to

"DC Eaton" <dce...@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:2dd7d739.03042...@posting.google.com...

> Funny that the Chicks didn't suck until people found out they had any
> opinions about anything at all, except gowns, guys and hairspray.
>

No that sucked then too.

> Springsteen is right about the McCarthy-esque vapors in the air,
> regardless of what some say. But what a waste of typing....
>

There is nothing "McCarthy"-like in pro-America people not wanting to help
anti-America people financially. Are you going to donate money to the KKK?
Why not? Maybe because they don't have the same beliefs as you? Same
difference here.

TC - Boycott *AND* Protest the Dipsies!

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 3:11:55 PM4/25/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8c0dp$nfg$1...@news.monmouth.com...

Hey cartoon boy. I think maybe your cel is all blurry.

Being Anti-Bush is not being anti-American and because one is against war
does not make them traitors.

Anyone, if the shoe fits... wear it, that calls those of us who dislike Bush
and/or are against war anti-Americans and traitors are the real
anti-Americans and traitors.

Shepherd


topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 3:09:48 PM4/25/03
to

Shepherd wrote:
>
> Hey cartoon boy. I think maybe your cel is all blurry.
>

Don't you have a flock to tend to or something "Shepherd"?

> Being Anti-Bush is not being anti-American and because one is against war
> does not make them traitors.
>
> Anyone, if the shoe fits... wear it, that calls those of us who dislike
Bush
> and/or are against war anti-Americans and traitors are the real
> anti-Americans and traitors.
>

Right, that's why the whole world was out there protesting when Klinton
bombed the shit out of Kosovo. Oh, wait, that never happened. You're all a
bunch of hypocritical, anti-Bush lefties whose real goal isn't to stop any
war but to take down President Bush. Good luck with that, you'll need it.

TC


Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 3:33:56 PM4/25/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8c1nf$o1d$1...@news.monmouth.com...

There you go blurring your cel even more.

Who's Klinton?

It may shock you to learn there are many other anti-Bush voters besides
Democrats.

It was even whispered to me that a growing number of these anti-Bush voters
are R-e-p-u-b-l-i-c-a-n-s.

Sorry about that.

Shepherd


topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 3:27:15 PM4/25/03
to

Shepherd wrote:

>
> There you go blurring your cel even more.
>
> Who's Klinton?
>

I wish the country had never found out.

> It may shock you to learn there are many other anti-Bush voters besides
> Democrats.
>
> It was even whispered to me that a growing number of these anti-Bush
voters
> are R-e-p-u-b-l-i-c-a-n-s.
>
> Sorry about that.
>

You live in a dream world don't you? Tell me what Bushs' approval rating is
right now. Tell me you're going to leave the country if he wins in 2004, not
that I'll believe you, but tell me.

TC


Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 4:50:11 PM4/25/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8c2qf$oj5$1...@news.monmouth.com...

>
> Shepherd wrote:
>
> >
> > There you go blurring your cel even more.
> >
> > Who's Klinton?
> >
>
> I wish the country had never found out.

We still don't know who Klinton is!

>
> > It may shock you to learn there are many other anti-Bush voters besides
> > Democrats.
> >
> > It was even whispered to me that a growing number of these anti-Bush
> voters
> > are R-e-p-u-b-l-i-c-a-n-s.
> >
> > Sorry about that.
> >
>
> You live in a dream world don't you? Tell me what Bushs' approval rating
is
> right now. Tell me you're going to leave the country if he wins in 2004,
not
> that I'll believe you, but tell me.
>
> TC

Come on pussycat! You know Bush's ratings are distorted and will drop like a
rock at election time.

Leave the country if he wins? No I like living in the country and I enjoy
living in the United States also. He won't win so why should I even thing
about such a thing.

Will you leave the country if he loses? Might as well pack your bags now.

Shepherd


Rex the Reaper

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 6:05:12 PM4/25/03
to
"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message news:<b8c0dp$nfg$1...@news.monmouth.com>...

> There is nothing "McCarthy"-like in pro-America people not wanting to help
> anti-America people financially. Are you going to donate money to the KKK?
> Why not? Maybe because they don't have the same beliefs as you? Same
> difference here.
>
> TC - Boycott *AND* Protest the Dipsies!

Yet another moron. Enough of this bullshit. What the fuck did they say
that was "Anti-American"? Let's review what they said.

They said that they were ashamed that Chimpy was from the same state
they were. What the hell is wrong with that? If Bush was from my
state, I would be ashamed too.

There is absolutely nothing "Anti-American" about insulting Bush.
People have been insulting the president back with our very first one.
Bush is not restricted from this. Critisism will continue whether you
like it or not. You're not going to change anything. This is not 1984.
People have a right to express there views.

And stop using America as an excuse whenever anyone attacks Dubya.
You're like a mindless zombie chanting "Anti-America" whenever anyone
says something you don't like. You're no more American than me or
anyone else.

Were you among the kooks who burned Beatles albums?

topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 6:21:12 PM4/25/03
to

Rex the Creepier wrote:

>
> Yet another moron. Enough of this bullshit. What the fuck did they say
> that was "Anti-American"? Let's review what they said.
>
> They said that they were ashamed that Chimpy was from the same state
> they were. What the hell is wrong with that? If Bush was from my
> state, I would be ashamed too.
>
> There is absolutely nothing "Anti-American" about insulting Bush.
> People have been insulting the president back with our very first one.
> Bush is not restricted from this. Critisism will continue whether you
> like it or not. You're not going to change anything. This is not 1984.
> People have a right to express there views.
>
> And stop using America as an excuse whenever anyone attacks Dubya.
> You're like a mindless zombie chanting "Anti-America" whenever anyone
> says something you don't like. You're no more American than me or
> anyone else.
>
> Were you among the kooks who burned Beatles albums?

Yeah, right. The chubbie Dipsy admitted to making "disrespectful" comments
about the President that she even felt compelled to apologize for. Compound
that with the fact she was overseas and we were on the brink of war when she
decided to shoot off her mouth, and you have a GUILTY verdict.

Nice try at a defense though, counselor.

TC

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 6:46:44 PM4/25/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8cbvh$su0$1...@news.monmouth.com...

Maines admitted to being "disrespectful' to Bush. What the hell is wrong
with that? At least half the post on this newsgroup are disrespectful to
that idiot, and as time goes on and the election of 2004 gets closer that
disrespect will become even stronger and more prevalent

She was in England when she stated how she felt about Bush. ENGLAND, not
Iraq, not France, not Germany, ENGLAND, an ally of the U.S. in Bush's quest
to start a war with Saddam.

And we were on the brink of war, not at war, when she made her very
acceptable remark. That was the perfect time to make her statement. In fact
I live in Texas and I'm not proud now and never have been proud of sharing
this state with him either.

She's no more guilty of anything than you are when you use the alias of a
failed cartoon cat.

Top Cat, my ass.

Dumb Shit would be more like it.

Shepherd

.


topcat

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 6:59:32 PM4/25/03
to

Shepherd wrote:

> Maines admitted to being "disrespectful' to Bush. What the hell is wrong
> with that? At least half the post on this newsgroup are disrespectful to
> that idiot, and as time goes on and the election of 2004 gets closer that
> disrespect will become even stronger and more prevalent
>

She exercised her right to say it and the American people are exercising
their right to boycott the Dipsies products. Simple really.

> She was in England when she stated how she felt about Bush. ENGLAND, not
> Iraq, not France, not Germany, ENGLAND, an ally of the U.S. in Bush's
quest
> to start a war with Saddam.
>

Is that supposed to be some kind of rationalization?


> And we were on the brink of war, not at war, when she made her very
> acceptable remark. That was the perfect time to make her statement. In
fact
> I live in Texas and I'm not proud now and never have been proud of sharing
> this state with him either.
>

I like my very acceptable boycott.

> She's no more guilty of anything than you are when you use the alias of a
> failed cartoon cat.
>

Hey are you going to send any money to the KKK this year? Why not? Maybe you
don't like their beliefs?

Maybe a majority of the American people don't like the chubby Dipsies
beliefs and don't feel like giving them any of their hard earned money.
Freedom of choice is a very good thing.

> Top Cat, my ass.
>

Glad it bothers you.

> Dumb Shit would be more like it.
>

Hey, a name calling liberal, never thought I'd see one of those.

TC

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 8:22:55 PM4/25/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8ce7f$rt$1...@news.monmouth.com...

>
> Shepherd wrote:
>
> > Maines admitted to being "disrespectful' to Bush. What the hell is wrong
> > with that? At least half the post on this newsgroup are disrespectful to
> > that idiot, and as time goes on and the election of 2004 gets closer
that
> > disrespect will become even stronger and more prevalent
> >
>
> She exercised her right to say it and the American people are exercising
> their right to boycott the Dipsies products. Simple really.

It would have to be simple for you to understand it, and it's not the
American people boycotting them, it's only a few brain-washed fools like
you.

>
> > She was in England when she stated how she felt about Bush. ENGLAND, not
> > Iraq, not France, not Germany, ENGLAND, an ally of the U.S. in Bush's
> quest
> > to start a war with Saddam.
> >
>
> Is that supposed to be some kind of rationalization?

No, just the facts. Think about it, if you can think that is.
If you are not intelligent enough to figure it out for yourself, I'll be
glad to explain it to you.

>
>
> > And we were on the brink of war, not at war, when she made her very
> > acceptable remark. That was the perfect time to make her statement. In
> fact
> > I live in Texas and I'm not proud now and never have been proud of
sharing
> > this state with him either.
> >
>
> I like my very acceptable boycott.

Boycott what? You probably steal all your music off of the web.


>
> > She's no more guilty of anything than you are when you use the alias of
a
> > failed cartoon cat.
> >
>
> Hey are you going to send any money to the KKK this year? Why not? Maybe
you
> don't like their beliefs?

With Bush throwing our money away on saving us from a impotent third world
country, I doubt if I will have enough money left to send any to anyone.
What about you? With your attitude towards the Constitution you must be a
full fledged KKK member. Are you going to help you kissing cousins out?

>
> Maybe a majority of the American people don't like the chubby Dipsies
> beliefs and don't feel like giving them any of their hard earned money.
> Freedom of choice is a very good thing.

What majority? Some poor misguided souls have been brain-washed to think
like you, but it's really only a few loud mouths stirring up the dirt.


>
> > Top Cat, my ass.
> >
>
> Glad it bothers you.

If such an immature handle doesn't bother you, I can live with it.

>
> > Dumb Shit would be more like it.
> >
>
> Hey, a name calling liberal, never thought I'd see one of those.
>
> TC

Normally we do not attempt to outdo you want-to-be Republicans in name
calling, but in your case I've make an exception.

Shepherd


Nola Daniell

unread,
Apr 25, 2003, 9:39:52 PM4/25/03
to

Why should I have to spend my day filtering political threads as the subjects
titles change out of a COUNTRY music NG. Why can't you keep your stuff to the
correct place. Or is that just too hard for you.

Nola

topcat

unread,
Apr 26, 2003, 10:53:25 AM4/26/03
to

"Shepherd wrote:
>
> It would have to be simple for you to understand it, and it's not the
> American people boycotting them, it's only a few brain-washed fools like
> you.
>

Ignorance is bliss, huh? Yup, they are on with Sawyer and apologizing there
fat asses off because of a few brain-washed fools like me.

>
> No, just the facts. Think about it, if you can think that is.
> If you are not intelligent enough to figure it out for yourself, I'll be
> glad to explain it to you.
>

Understanding it and giving it any creedence are two different things. The
British *government* was our ally at the time, the British people were
against the war at the same time, smarty clown. She tried to suck up to them
with her inane comment and now the whole band is paying.

> > I like my very acceptable boycott.
>
> Boycott what? You probably steal all your music off of the web.
>

I love when I reduce people to irrelevant speculative comments.

> With Bush throwing our money away on saving us from a impotent third world
> country, I doubt if I will have enough money left to send any to anyone.
> What about you? With your attitude towards the Constitution you must be a
> full fledged KKK member. Are you going to help you kissing cousins out?
>

Avoidance of subject, noted.

> What majority? Some poor misguided souls have been brain-washed to think
> like you, but it's really only a few loud mouths stirring up the dirt.
> >

Addressed above.

>
> If such an immature handle doesn't bother you, I can live with it.
>

Happy to have your blessing.

>
> Normally we do not attempt to outdo you want-to-be Republicans in name
> calling, but in your case I've make an exception.
>

Not a very good one, though. If cracking on my handle and insinuating I have
something to do with the KKK is all you've got, it's time to go back to the
drawing board.

TC


topcat

unread,
Apr 26, 2003, 11:01:08 AM4/26/03
to

Nola Daniell wrote:
>
> Why should I have to spend my day filtering political threads as the
subjects
> titles change out of a COUNTRY music NG. Why can't you keep your stuff to
the
> correct place. Or is that just too hard for you.
>

I'm really hurt that you are trying to place the blame for this entire mess
on me. I'm just replying to messages the same as you. Why should *I* have to
trim off newsgroups that *I* didn't even put up there to begin with?

I was just trying to help you out for informational purposes, like someone
stopping to help you with a flat tire, for instance. What does the good
samaritan get? Right, stepped on.

Look, maybe we can straighten this whole thing out by changing the
conversation to country music. That might piss off some of the political
posters and then you'll feel better.

So what do you think of Tim McGraw? You know his father is ex-Mets pitcher
Tug McGraw, right? My favorite country artist of all time is the late great
Waylon Jennings. How about you?

TC


Nola Daniell

unread,
Apr 26, 2003, 10:08:08 PM4/26/03
to

topcat wrote:

> So what do you think of Tim McGraw? You know his father is ex-Mets pitcher
> Tug McGraw, right? My favorite country artist of all time is the late great
> Waylon Jennings. How about you?
>
> TC

I don't think much of Tim McGraw one way or the other, I don't particularly like
him but I certainly don't hate him. He's had some good songs, I prefer his
earlier stuff and even bought his "Not a Moment Too Soon" CD and still enjoy
it. But I don't ever think he'll be remembered in the same vein as someone like
Waylon.

My favourite country artist of all time? That's a pretty hard question to
answer but if it has to be one, and one only, then I would say Texan
singer/songwriter Guy Clark.


Nola

Rick and Debbie Caudill

unread,
Apr 26, 2003, 10:23:24 PM4/26/03
to
On Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:08:08 +0800, Nola Daniell <ndan...@wn.com.au>
wrote:

I knew we would agree on McGraw Nola.....LOL..........and like you, I
don't think he will be remembered as one of the all time
greats....that would be a great conversation starter, who out of all
the current artists will be remembered in the vein of Waylon, Willie,
etc.?

Oh and might I add, that my favorite male country singer would have to
be Tracy Lawrence, and female....hmmmm......I would have to say Patsy
Cline......I can still just listen and listen to her.........

Deb

Pete

unread,
Apr 27, 2003, 1:54:30 AM4/27/03
to
In article <3EAB3B88...@wn.com.au>,
Nola Daniell <ndan...@wn.com.au> wrote:

> topcat wrote:
>
> > So what do you think of Tim McGraw? You know his father is ex-Mets pitcher
> > Tug McGraw, right? My favorite country artist of all time is the late great
> > Waylon Jennings. How about you?

1. Waylon.
2. Lee Roy Parnell
3. T. Graham Brown.
4. Most of the rest...Pete

topcat

unread,
Apr 28, 2003, 11:13:36 AM4/28/03
to

Nola Daniell wrote:

>
> I don't think much of Tim McGraw one way or the other, I don't
particularly like
> him but I certainly don't hate him. He's had some good songs, I prefer
his
> earlier stuff and even bought his "Not a Moment Too Soon" CD and still
enjoy
> it. But I don't ever think he'll be remembered in the same vein as
someone like
> Waylon.
>
> My favourite country artist of all time? That's a pretty hard question to
> answer but if it has to be one, and one only, then I would say Texan
> singer/songwriter Guy Clark.

That's an odd choice given all the artists out there.

None of the current country singers can live up to the classics, imo. Except
if you want to consider George Strait in the current group. Here is how I
would rank them:

1. Waylon
2. Mickey Gilley
3. M-M-Mel Tillis
4. Ronnie Milsap
5. George Strait

Then you could lump George Jones, Garth Brooks, Willie Nelson and a bunch of
others together.

TC


Jim

unread,
Apr 28, 2003, 12:05:52 PM4/28/03
to
"Shepherd" <sticksnorstones@.att.net> wrote in message news:<4Ocqa.80055$ja4.5...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...

> "Jim" <somd_j...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1a9cb195.0304...@posting.google.com...
> > "Shepherd" <sticksnorstones@.att.net> wrote in message
> news:<%9Fpa.76254$ja4.5...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> >
> > > Heard on TV news today that some states may not even carry his name on
> their
> > > 2004 ballot. I have doubts about that, but your Bush is not nearly as
> > > popular as you are lead to believe.
> >
> > Jeez, can ANYONE spin a tale into a bigger lie than that?

> The truth bothers you, doesn't it?

What truth? What you "heard" and what your reported above do not relate.

> Well, get plenty of antacid tablets on
> hand because as the election year begins and progresses, you will see just
> how unpopular Bush really is.

Yeah, I heard that prediction a lot - in October of 2002.

Jim

Shepherd

unread,
Apr 28, 2003, 1:16:42 PM4/28/03
to

"Jim" <somd_j...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1a9cb195.03042...@posting.google.com...

What was Bush running for then?

Shepherd


David Knutsen

unread,
Apr 28, 2003, 9:56:47 PM4/28/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8jgkb$oq0$1...@news.monmouth.com...

>
> Nola Daniell wrote:
> > My favourite country artist of all time? That's a pretty hard question
to
> > answer but if it has to be one, and one only, then I would say Texan
> > singer/songwriter Guy Clark.
>
> That's an odd choice given all the artists out there.
>
> None of the current country singers can live up to the classics, imo.
Except
> if you want to consider George Strait in the current group. Here is how I
> would rank them:
>
> 1. Waylon
> 2. Mickey Gilley
> 3. M-M-Mel Tillis
> 4. Ronnie Milsap
> 5. George Strait
>
> Then you could lump George Jones, Garth Brooks, Willie Nelson and a bunch
of
> others together.
>
> TC
My top 5 Country Artists would be
1. Hank Williams Sr.
2. Johnny Cash
3. Lorretta Lynn
4. George Jones
5. Flatt & Scruggs


The Nice Mean Man

unread,
Apr 29, 2003, 6:06:46 AM4/29/03
to
"David Knutsen" <dnu...@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:<zZkra.662778$F1.87883@sccrnsc04>...

A good go.
Mine goes...
1] Hank Sr.
2] The Carter Family
3] Merle Travis
4] The Louvin Brothers
5] Gram Parsons

topcat

unread,
Apr 29, 2003, 10:12:54 AM4/29/03
to

The Nice Mean Man wrote:

> > > TC
> > My top 5 Country Artists would be
> > 1. Hank Williams Sr.
> > 2. Johnny Cash
> > 3. Lorretta Lynn
> > 4. George Jones
> > 5. Flatt & Scruggs
>
> A good go.
> Mine goes...
> 1] Hank Sr.
> 2] The Carter Family
> 3] Merle Travis
> 4] The Louvin Brothers
> 5] Gram Parsons


Looks like you and David K. are a generation before me or just like the
oldies.

TC


David Knutsen

unread,
Apr 29, 2003, 5:41:59 PM4/29/03
to

"topcat" <top...@aboy.com> wrote in message
news:b8m1et$74c$1...@news.monmouth.com...
Hey, I resemble that remark! Really though, I grew up listening to them
while living on the farm. I remember going to the Vikings Club on Tuesday
nights for the Mississippi Valley Country Music Association. They always had
a live band and there was this one guy who sang and looked just like Johnny
Cash. Those days are long past now, I live in the city and my kids hate
country music.


topcat

unread,
Apr 30, 2003, 11:14:35 AM4/30/03
to

"David Knutsen wrote:
> >
> > Looks like you and David K. are a generation before me or just like the
> > oldies.

> >


> Hey, I resemble that remark! Really though, I grew up listening to them
> while living on the farm. I remember going to the Vikings Club on Tuesday
> nights for the Mississippi Valley Country Music Association. They always
had
> a live band and there was this one guy who sang and looked just like
Johnny
> Cash. Those days are long past now, I live in the city and my kids hate
> country music.
>
>

I was sort of a captive audience. I grew up in the city, but my mom would
always play country music at home and in the car. After a while I took a
liking to it. I also like rock-n-roll and other forms of music. My kid isn't
listening to any country music either. :-)

TC


0 new messages