Hooray for Nancy Pelosi's trip over to the Middle East!
i_tell_it_l...@yahoo.com
GWBush does not represent the general population of the US!
Yes, so good that she went. Bushies' State Department has registered
a complaint with Nancy, saying she should not have gone. But they
didn't have any problems when a prevous delegation of Senators went
over did they? Naw, because it was all repuglinuts!
And Bush's people say that there has not been much ground gained in
talking to Syria's Assad. Well, EWOC, maybe you and your people just
don't know how to deal correctly. The Middle East does not like
American and other Western hegemonic imperialist interlopers like you
and Tony Blair. Your administration has sent Condo Rice and Karen
Hughes over to the Arab and Islamic nations to try to get them to bend
to your will by way of your brand of "diplomacy" and "demoKKKKracy"
and it didn't work. Heck, Karen Hughes had to take a fast exit out of
one of the countries.....she made THAT bad of an impression on those
people....
Yayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy Nancy! American Democratic hero AND patriot!
Bill Kawalec
on her.
--
I never read email at the Yahoo address!
<i_tell_it_l...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1175796770.5...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
sarom...@gmail.com
> Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> on her.
>
But is she as dumb as you?
Neal Eckhardt
<billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
>on her.
It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
running in the next election. She has made a mockery of her position
demanding things no other speaker has ever requested, and then pulls
this stuff.
I hopr I am wrong.
Greg Goss
But YOU don't make it hard for men running? Why would Hillary or a
hypothetical Condi be tarred by what people like you think about
Pelosi? Unless you're a bigot who thinks that all women are alike?
>I hopr I am wrong.
Does it matter whether you are wrong or not? You have no power here.
Unless you decide that hating "Nancy" is a good enough reason to vote
against "Hillary".
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27
Maybe
Yep
Paul Ciszek
In article <n0ma135iqg7dipmv4...@4ax.com>,
If you are refering to the bullshit about the airplane, she never asked
for it and didn't want it.
--
Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
grey @vdclinic.org Gandalf Grey
Pratfall in Damascus
Nancy Pelosi's foolish shuttle diplomacy
Thursday, April 5, 2007; A16
HOUSE SPEAKER Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) offered an excellent demonstration
yesterday of why members of Congress should not attempt to supplant the
secretary of state when traveling abroad. After a meeting with Syrian
dictator Bashar al-Assad in Damascus, Ms. Pelosi announced that she had
delivered a message from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert that "Israel was
ready to engage in peace talks" with Syria. What's more, she added, Mr.
Assad was ready to "resume the peace process" as well. Having announced this
seeming diplomatic breakthrough, Ms. Pelosi suggested that her Kissingerian
shuttle diplomacy was just getting started. "We expressed our interest in
using our good offices in promoting peace between Israel and Syria," she
said.
Only one problem: The Israeli prime minister entrusted Ms. Pelosi with no
such message. "What was communicated to the U.S. House Speaker does not
contain any change in the policies of Israel," said a statement quickly
issued by the prime minister's office. In fact, Mr. Olmert told Ms. Pelosi
that "a number of Senate and House members who recently visited Damascus
received the impression that despite the declarations of Bashar Assad, there
is no change in the position of his country regarding a possible peace
process with Israel." In other words, Ms. Pelosi not only misrepresented
Israel's position but was virtually alone in failing to discern that Mr.
Assad's words were mere propaganda.
Ms. Pelosi was criticized by President Bush for visiting Damascus at a time
when the administration -- rightly or wrongly -- has frozen high-level
contacts with Syria. Mr. Bush said that thanks to the speaker's freelancing
Mr. Assad was getting mixed messages from the United States. Ms. Pelosi
responded by pointing out that Republican congressmen had visited Syria
without drawing presidential censure. That's true enough -- but those other
congressmen didn't try to introduce a new U.S. diplomatic initiative in the
Middle East. "We came in friendship, hope, and determined that the road to
Damascus is a road to peace," Ms. Pelosi grandly declared.
Never mind that that statement is ludicrous: As any diplomat with knowledge
of the region could have told Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Assad is a corrupt thug whose
overriding priority at the moment is not peace with Israel but heading off
U.N. charges that he orchestrated the murder of former Lebanese prime
minister Rafiq al-Hariri. The really striking development here is the
attempt by a Democratic congressional leader to substitute her own foreign
policy for that of a sitting Republican president. Two weeks ago Ms. Pelosi
rammed legislation through the House of Representatives that would strip Mr.
Bush of his authority as commander in chief to manage troop movements in
Iraq. Now she is attempting to introduce a new Middle East policy that
directly conflicts with that of the president. We have found much to
criticize in Mr. Bush's military strategy and regional diplomacy. But Ms.
Pelosi's attempt to establish a shadow presidency is not only
counterproductive, it is foolish.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/04/AR2007040402306_pf.html
Red
I see the Washington Post gave her a thumbs up for her visit......NOT!
Bill Bonde
Greg Goss wrote:
>
> Neal Eckhardt <neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
> ><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> >>on her.
> >
> >It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
> >running in the next election. She has made a mockery of her position
> >demanding things no other speaker has ever requested, and then pulls
> >this stuff.
>
> But YOU don't make it hard for men running? Why would Hillary or a
> hypothetical Condi be tarred by what people like you think about
> Pelosi? Unless you're a bigot who thinks that all women are alike?
>
Like it or not, the US has yet to have a woman as president, so the
discussion isn't outside the bounds. It would be silly, of course, to
really disparage Hillary for antics by Pelosi. If Madam Speaker burps up
on her bib, I say blame no one but the sushi chef who served Bush's
father.
Guy
"Neal Eckhardt" <neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote in message
news:n0ma135iqg7dipmv4...@4ax.com...
When Dennis Hastert went to Columbia in 1997 and told the leaders there to
ignore President Clinton and to deal directly with the Republican Congress,
was he wrong too? Or are you suggesting it was OK for him because he's a man
while Pelosi is merely a woman? Or was it OK for him being a Republican and
all, while it's "how DARE a Democratic party leader try to usurp ANY
function of our glorious leader, King George"?
Frank from Deeetroit
"Bill Kawalec" <billk...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:B9ednVGdqu9OzIjb...@comcast.com...
> Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> on her.
Pelosi has some nice cans for being an old lady.
Bill Bonde
Guy wrote:
>
> "Neal Eckhardt" <neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:n0ma135iqg7dipmv4...@4ax.com...
> > On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
> > <billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> >>on her.
> >
> > It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
> > running in the next election. She has made a mockery of her position
> > demanding things no other speaker has ever requested, and then pulls
> > this stuff.
> >
> > I hopr I am wrong.
>
> When Dennis Hastert went to Columbia in 1997 and told the leaders there to
> ignore President Clinton and to deal directly with the Republican Congress,
> was he wrong too?
>
If he really did that, then of course he was wrong. The US should speak
with one voice from its government on foreign policy and that is from
the president.
> Or are you suggesting it was OK for him because he's a man
> while Pelosi is merely a woman? Or was it OK for him being a Republican and
> all, while it's "how DARE a Democratic party leader try to usurp ANY
> function of our glorious leader, King George"?
>
I'd like some actual evidence that what you claim really happened in the
way you claim it happened.
--
Personally, I believe that 9/11 should have taught us the lesson that we
can't let these countries simmer endlessly in disillusionment without
doing something about it because people become susceptible to delusional
ideas and delusional actions. Iraq, in my view, is but the first of many
efforts, certainly not all military, to remake the very face of the
world as constitutional representative democracy.
Bill Kawalec
<sarom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175803200....@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
wow! great comeback! I sincerely beleive that's the best you could do,
though.
Bill Kawalec
"queenie" <que...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:rmbb1395pnrute6a9...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
> <neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>leash
>>>on her.
>>
>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>running in the next election.
>
> President, Attorney General,.....
>
>
good point.
nothing annoys me more than people who will support a dumbass, just because
she's ""our"" dumbass. a dumbass is a dumbass...
Bob
<shor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8adb13d3j49snut48...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:25:05 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
>><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>>leash
>>>>on her.
>>>
>>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>>running in the next election.
>>
>>President, Attorney General,.....
>>
>>
>
> Bush has failed to make any progress in a tense midast situation in the
> past 6 years. So Pelosi has every right to try and uphold Americans'
> interests.
Well, BS ... not that I like Pelosi or Bush ... But you need to look at your
job description and go from there ... Pelosi should have looked around and
figured out the she ain't the foreign policy person ... jumped in her limo
and gone to the State department to make her point ... she is moving toward
being as big an idiot as Bush ...
Wish I could vote against her in the next election ... maybe I'll move ...
Bob
David Eduardo
Oh yeah, Nancy Pelosi. Man I would love to open her up like a
Christmas present.
nesta far-i
> Wish I could vote against her in the next election ... maybe I'll move ...
To Pelosi's district? Right!
Bill Kawalec
<shor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:8adb13d3j49snut48...@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:25:05 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
>><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>>leash
>>>>on her.
>>>
>>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>>running in the next election.
>>
>>Using that standard, a man should never be elected President, Vice
>>President, Attorney General,.....
>>
>>
>
> I don't have any problem with Pelosi doing what's best for America.
> Bush has failed to make any progress in a tense midast situation in the
> past 6 years. So Pelosi has every right to try and uphold Americans'
> interests.
Pelosi doesn't have one freakin' clue what's best for America.
>
> The United States Constitution defines three co-equal branches of
> government. The Executive Branch is only one of those three.
>
> It is not surprising that the Congress and the Supreme Court have
> stepped in to arrest the errors made by this administration throughout
> its 6 year blemished career. If President Bush won't act rationally and
> legally then the other branches of our government should not, and will
> not, allow the president latitude to pursue errant actions.
>
> You can bet your bippie that nearly every member of Congress (privately)
> thinks the entire Iraq War was a scam thought up by Cheny and Rumsfeld
> and rubber-stamped by Bush.
>
Bet YOUR bippie that, no matter who is elected in 08, there will not be a
withdrawal from Iraq. Hillary is already backtracking.
> The arrogance and stupidity of Bush has cost America much of the
> goodwill it had built throughout the world in the past century.
Frnakly, I give far less of a damn about ""good will"" than I do about the
safety and security of the whole world. It ain't just us. London. Madrid.
I'm not saying that I KNOW the war in Iraq to be the answer, but I can't,
like many, pretend that I KNOW it isn't either.
It will
> take decades of forward-looking leaders to repair the damage. And no
> one can reverse the damage done to our population by Bush stifling
> stem-cell legislation and environmental law.
DISINFORMATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No one is opposed to stem cell research,
pal. The opposition is to one method of obtaining the stem cells, AND, if
you really did your homeework, what you would KNOW is that adult stem cell
therapy is already being used, with significant success, while embyonic stem
cell research is still in the lab rat stages, and the rats INVARIABLY end up
with brain tumors!
--
I never read email at the Yahoo address!
>
> Shame on George W. Bush. He is not fit to be president.
>
RHF
>
> - Show quoted text -
U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-US,-Subservient-in-Syria.html
Islamic Head Scarf => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
what will hillary do to top her ~ RHF
.
.
. .
chess
>
>
> <shor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8adb13d3j49snut48...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:25:05 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
>>><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>>>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>>>leash
>>>>>on her.
>>>>
>>>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>>>running in the next election.
>>>
>>>Using that standard, a man should never be elected President, Vice
>>>President, Attorney General,.....
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I don't have any problem with Pelosi doing what's best for America.
>> Bush has failed to make any progress in a tense midast situation in the
>> past 6 years. So Pelosi has every right to try and uphold Americans'
>> interests.
>
>
> Pelosi doesn't have one freakin' clue what's best for America.
And shrub does? NOT!
Red
wrote:
> "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:B9ednVGdqu9OzIjb...@comcast.com...
>
> > Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> > on her.
>
> Pelosi has some nice cans for being an old lady.
>
>
>
>
>
> > --
> > I never read email at the Yahoo address!
> >news:1175796770.5...@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >> Nancy Pelosi correct going to the Middle East and ensuring that EWOC
> >> GWBush does not represent the general population of the US!
>
> >> Yes, so good that she went. Bushies' State Department has registered
> >> a complaint with Nancy, saying she should not have gone. But they
> >> didn't have any problems when a prevous delegation of Senators went
> >> over did they? Naw, because it was all repuglinuts!
>
> >> And Bush's people say that there has not been much ground gained in
> >> talking to Syria's Assad. Well, EWOC, maybe you and your people just
> >> don't know how to deal correctly. The Middle East does not like
> >> American and other Western hegemonic imperialist interlopers like you
> >> and Tony Blair. Your administration has sent Condo Rice and Karen
> >> Hughes over to the Arab and Islamic nations to try to get them to bend
> >> to your will by way of your brand of "diplomacy" and "demoKKKKracy"
> >> and it didn't work. Heck, Karen Hughes had to take a fast exit out of
> >> one of the countries.....she made THAT bad of an impression on those
> >> people....
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yes this I can agree with. I bet in her earlier days in college she
had rounded heels. A real dirty whore who slept with someone
important which helped her along the way. And those eyes are freaky.
I bet she sucks a mean cock too!
Red
You probably have to be queer or rich! I'm neither, poor and normal
describes me.
Paul Ciszek
In article <1175862900....@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Red <RedRed...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>Yes this I can agree with. I bet in her earlier days in college she
>had rounded heels. A real dirty whore who slept with someone
>important which helped her along the way. And those eyes are freaky.
>I bet she sucks a mean cock too!
I cannot help but pity men who think ill of women who suck cock.
They have no idea what they're missing.
Paul Ciszek
In article <1175838752.1...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
>http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-US,-Subservient-in-Syria.html
>Islamic Head Scarf => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
Dome of the Rock:
http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-at-moon/
(I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just sinking
to your level.)
Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
headscarf when in a house of worship!
danny burstein
[ snip ]
>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
>headscarf when in a house of worship!
Methinks you mean the _last_ centuy, laddie.
--
_____________________________________________________
Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
dan...@panix.com
[to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
Paul Ciszek
In article <ev5n81$gni$1...@reader2.panix.com>,
danny burstein <dan...@panix.com> wrote:
>In <ev5n3n$jp$1...@reader2.panix.com> nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) writes:
> [ snip ]
>
>>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
>>headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
>Methinks you mean the _last_ centuy, laddie.
Aye. I'm still writing "1907" on my checks.
Dana Carpender
Paul Ciszek wrote:
> In article <1175838752.1...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
>>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
>>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
>>http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-US,-Subservient-in-Syria.html
>>Islamic Head Scarf => http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
>
>
> Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> Dome of the Rock:
> http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-at-moon/
>
> (I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just sinking
> to your level.)
>
> Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
> headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship were expected
to cover their heads, as well. And then there are those yarmulkes...
Dana
Red
> In article <1175862900.225723.68...@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Red <RedRedCoun...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >Yes this I can agree with. I bet in her earlier days in college she
> >had rounded heels. A real dirty whore who slept with someone
> >important which helped her along the way. And those eyes are freaky.
> >I bet she sucks a mean cock too!
>
> I cannot help but pity men who think ill of women who suck cock.
> They have no idea what they're missing.
>
> --
> Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
> pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
> Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
lol
Bill Kawalec
"chess" <che...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:YSqRh.63601$mJ1....@newsfe22.lga...
>
> "Bill Kawalec" <billk...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:MNidnfBkltpST4jb...@comcast.com...
>>
>>
>> <shor...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:8adb13d3j49snut48...@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:25:05 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
>>>><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>>>>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>>>>leash
>>>>>>on her.
>>>>>
>>>>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>>>>running in the next election.
>>>>
>>>>Using that standard, a man should never be elected President, Vice
>>>>President, Attorney General,.....
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't have any problem with Pelosi doing what's best for America.
>>> Bush has failed to make any progress in a tense midast situation in the
>>> past 6 years. So Pelosi has every right to try and uphold Americans'
>>> interests.
>>
>>
>> Pelosi doesn't have one freakin' clue what's best for America.
>
> And shrub does? NOT!
>
>>
>>
that's not the point. you are entitled to think whatever you want of GWB,
but it is folly to then support an idiot just because she's not GWB.
sarom...@gmail.com
> <saroman0...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Not intended as a comeback. Merely a legitimate question based on
your initial comments.
Frank from Deeetroit
"Paul Ciszek" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:ev5md8$86t$1...@reader2.panix.com...
>
> In article <1175862900....@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
> Red <RedRed...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>Yes this I can agree with. I bet in her earlier days in college she
>>had rounded heels. A real dirty whore who slept with someone
>>important which helped her along the way. And those eyes are freaky.
>>I bet she sucks a mean cock too!
>
> I cannot help but pity men who think ill of women who suck cock.
> They have no idea what they're missing.
No ill will, everyone likes blow jobs, don't they?
sli...@slidge.com
> running in the next election.
Yep, and Robert Aderholt and Frank Wolf, who visited with Assad THE DAY
BEFORE Pelosi did, are going to make it tough for men running in the next
election as well. And let's not forget David Hobson, who visited Assad
with Pelosi.
> She has made a mockery of her position demanding things no other speaker
> has ever requested, and then pulls this stuff.
>
Yawn. The airplane story was debunked a month ago by the Sgt-at-Arms.
> I hopr I am wrong.
Your hope is rewarded, because you can't be much more wrong than you are.
Bill Kawalec
--
I never read email at the Yahoo address!
<sarom...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1175880355.0...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
yer azz
Bugman
"Dana Carpender" <dcar...@kivanospam.net> wrote in message
news:UMGdnVKJTexI_ovb...@insightbb.com...
Not many uncovered Amish heads
Dana Carpender
Bugman wrote:
Do the Amish expect us "English" to cover our heads if we go in their
houses of worship?
Dana
benrrrrrrrrand, esq
wrote:
>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
>>>on her.
>>
>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>running in the next election.
>
>Using that standard, a man should never be elected President, Vice
>President, Attorney General,.....
>
>
No, just a moron woman like Nancy Pelosi.
What are her qualifications to go overseas and bargain with a
terrorist state?
You know who she's like?
Ever see Die Hard?
Remember the cokehead asshole who thought he could bargain with Hans?
Do you think he was making a wise decision?
Greg Goss
>> It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>> running in the next election.
>
>Yep, and Robert Aderholt and Frank Wolf, who visited with Assad THE DAY
>BEFORE Pelosi did, are going to make it tough for men running in the next
>election as well. And let's not forget David Hobson, who visited Assad
>with Pelosi.
>
>> She has made a mockery of her position demanding things no other speaker
>> has ever requested, and then pulls this stuff.
>>
>
>Yawn. The airplane story was debunked a month ago by the Sgt-at-Arms.
You cannot debunk a right-wing claim. Evidence is irrelevant to
faith. I still see the silverware crap fairly frequently.
--
Tomorrow is today already.
Greg Goss, 1989-01-27
Red
> Bugman wrote:
> > "Dana Carpender" <dcarp...@kivanospam.net> wrote in message
> >news:UMGdnVKJTexI_ovb...@insightbb.com...
>
> >>Paul Ciszek wrote:
>
> >>>RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >>>>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
> >>>>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
> >>>>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
> >>>>Islamic Head Scarf =>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
>
> >>>Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> >>>Dome of the Rock:
>
> >>>(I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just
> >>>sinking
> >>>to your level.)
>
> >>>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
> >>>headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
> >>And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship were expected
> >>to cover their heads, as well. And then there are those yarmulkes...
>
> > Not many uncovered Amish heads
>
> Do the Amish expect us "English" to cover our heads if we go in their
> houses of worship?
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
No!
Tazmanian Devil
"nesta far-i" <net...@cox.net> wrote in message
news:SekRh.136977$907....@newsfe13.phx...
I don't think they have facilities for trailers. But, hell, Bob could always
pull an Ann Coulter and vote in Pelosi's district anyway.
Tazmanian Devil
"Red" <RedRed...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1175862976.9...@p77g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
So does stupid, semi-literate, cuckolded, and bigoted. You wear a lot of
hats.
m II
> In article <ev5n81$gni$1...@reader2.panix.com>,
> danny burstein <dan...@panix.com> wrote:
>
>>In <ev5n3n$jp$1...@reader2.panix.com> nos...@nospam.com (Paul Ciszek) writes:
>>[ snip ]
>>
>>
>>>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
>>>headscarf when in a house of worship!
>>
>>Methinks you mean the _last_ centuy, laddie.
>
>
> Aye. I'm still writing "1907" on my checks.
>
Darn. Does this mean Halley's Comet isn't coming in three years?
mike
bpnjensen
> On Apr 6, 3:10?pm, Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kivanospam.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Bugman wrote:
> > > "Dana Carpender" <dcarp...@kivanospam.net> wrote in message
> > >news:UMGdnVKJTexI_ovb...@insightbb.com...
>
> > >>Paul Ciszek wrote:
>
> > >>>In article <1175838752.153313.272...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> > >>>RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > >>>>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
> > >>>>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
> > >>>>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
> > >>>>http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-...
>
> > >>>Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> > >>>Dome of the Rock:
> > >>>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-a...
>
> > >>>(I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just
> > >>>sinking
> > >>>to your level.)
>
> > >>>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
> > >>>headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
> > >>And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship were expected
>
> > > Not many uncovered Amish heads
>
> > Do the Amish expect us "English" to cover our heads if we go in their
> > houses of worship?
>
> > Dana- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
I greatly admire and respect the Amish - I'd do it out of respect.
Bruce Jensen
Jeff Lanam
>
>I see the Washington Post gave her a thumbs up for her visit......NOT!
More precisely, Fred Hiatt, the rightwing editor of the WP, wrote an
editorial criticizing her that had statements of fact that were
contradicted by the reporters in the same paper. The Washington Post
has not had a liberal editoral slant for a couple of years.
Paul Ciszek
In article <TfydnXHG9Ln3DYvb...@comcast.com>,
Frank from Deeetroit <dadur...@voyager.net> wrote:
>
>"Paul Ciszek" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote in message
>news:ev5md8$86t$1...@reader2.panix.com...
>>
>> In article <1175862900....@w1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
>> Red <RedRed...@aol.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>Yes this I can agree with. I bet in her earlier days in college she
>>>had rounded heels. A real dirty whore who slept with someone
>>>important which helped her along the way. And those eyes are freaky.
>>>I bet she sucks a mean cock too!
>>
>> I cannot help but pity men who think ill of women who suck cock.
>> They have no idea what they're missing.
>
>No ill will, everyone likes blow jobs, don't they?
Republicans hate blow jobs unless it's done for money, as in the case
of Cpl. Matthew Sanchez.
Red
> "Red" <RedRedCoun...@aol.com> wrote in message
Thanks. Got to love that liberal love!
Red
>
> - Show quoted text -
It's not mandatory though.
Red
wrote:
> On 5 Apr 2007 14:35:08 -0700, "Red" <RedRedCoun...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> >I see the Washington Post gave her a thumbs up for her visit......NOT!
>
> More precisely, Fred Hiatt, the rightwing editor of the WP, wrote an
> editorial criticizing her that had statements of fact that were
> contradicted by the reporters in the same paper. The Washington Post
> has not had a liberal editoral slant for a couple of years.
Liberals just can't take one on the chin, can they!
Bill Kawalec
--
I never read email at the Yahoo address!
"queenie" <que...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:a6qd13lk1em75hins...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 15:31:21 -0500, "benrrrrrrrrand, esq"
> <po...@circumstance.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 22:25:05 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 Apr 2007 16:13:43 -0400, Neal Eckhardt
>>><neck...@penntraffic.nospam.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>>>><billk...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
>>>>>leash
>>>>>on her.
>>>>
>>>>It is unfortunate, but I think her antics may make it tough for women
>>>>running in the next election.
>>>
>>>Using that standard, a man should never be elected President, Vice
>>>President, Attorney General,.....>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>No, just a moron woman like Nancy Pelosi.
>
> But Bush is a genius, right?
>>
>>What are her qualifications to go overseas and bargain with a
>>terrorist state?
>
> You really don't want to discuss this. Don't you have some nasty
> Clinton anecdote you want to tell so that you can avoid the real
> issues?
>>
>>You know who she's like?
>
> I know she's an example of an intelligent leader.
oh puhllleeeeeeeze
>>
>>Ever see Die Hard?
>>
>>Remember the cokehead asshole who thought he could bargain with Hans?
>>
>>Do you think he was making a wise decision?
>
> Oh, a new tack. Well talk about movies instead of Clinton.
>
>
>
benrrrrrrrand
wrote:
>
>Oh, a new tack. Well talk about movies instead of Clinton.
Just talking about movies that expose and illustrate what a stupid ass
Nancy Pelosi is.
So she jus tsaunters into Syria, because you morons hate Bush.
Great thinking on your part.
Should do well for ME peace.
Oh well.
WWIII is right around the corner, Old Nancy with the fake tits is
helping it along.
chess
Voice of America 4/2/97
WHEN THE AIR FORCE 707 LANDED IN TAIWAN WITH HOUSE SPEAKER NEWT GINGRICH AND
11 OTHER CONGRESSMEN, TAIWAN FOREIGN MINISTER JOHN ZHANG WENT OUT ON THE
TARMAC TO GREET THEM WITH OPEN ARMS.
TAIWAN LEADERS SEE THE VISIT AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SHOW RIVAL CHINA, AND THE
REST OF THE WORLD, THAT ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH THE UNITED STATES IS ON SOLID
GROUND.
MR. GINGRICH DID NOT DISAPPOINT THEM. FOLLOWING A MEETING WITH PRESIDENT LEE
DENG HUI AT HIS OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN TAIPEI -- IT LASTED WELL OVER AN HOUR --
THE HOUSE SPEAKER HELD A WORKING LUNCH WITH VICE PRESIDENT LIEN CHAN.
SPEAKING AT A PRE-DEPARTURE NEWS CONFERENCE, MR. GINGRICH REPEATED HIS VIEWS
ON AMERICA'S COMMITMENT TO THE DEFENSE OF TAIWAN.
chess
Here's Lala
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2007/4/4/115721/7509
Bill Kawalec
chess
New York Times, March 31, 1997 -- reporting on a trip to China by House
Speaker Newt Gingrich, one week after Vice President Al Gore's trip:
Speaking with startling bluntness on an issue so delicate that diplomats
have tiptoed around it for years, Newt Gingrich said today that he had
warned China's top leaders that the United States would intervene militarily
if Taiwan was attacked.
As he left for Tokyo after a three-day trip to China, Mr. Gingrich said he
had made it absolutely clear how the United States would respond if such a
military conflict arose.
Referring to his meetings with China's leaders, Mr. Gingrich said: ''I
said firmly, 'We want you to understand, we will defend Taiwan. Period.'"
He also said, ''I think that they are more aware now that we would defend
Taiwan if it were militarily attacked.''
Mr. Gingrich, the Speaker of the House, delivered his message, among the
most forceful ever given about Taiwan by a visiting United States official,
to Wang Daohan, China's chief representative in talks with Taiwan. Mr.
Gingrich said he had given the same message to President Jiang Zemin and
Prime Minister Li Peng in Beijing last week.
Chinese leaders offered no public response to Mr. Gingrich today. But on
Friday, Mr. Jiang urged him to treat the Taiwan issue with care. . . .
Asked about Mr. Gingrich's statements, a Clinton Administration official
in Washington said Mr. Gingrich had received briefings about American policy
toward China, but that Mr. Gingrich ''was speaking for himself'' in his
conversations with Chinese leaders.
The White House issued a statement saying that the policy of the United
States was to ''meet its obligation under the Taiwan Relations Act,
including the maintenance of an adequate self-defense for Taiwan,'' and that
the Administration would maintain its ''one-China policy, the fundamental
bedrock of which is that both parties peacefully address the Taiwan issue. .
. ."
In an interview on Friday, Mr. Gingrich said he had spoken with Mr.
Clinton, and with Mr. Gore on several occasions, to make sure that their
messages to Beijing dovetailed. At the time, he did not mention his message
on Taiwan.
Several days later, Gingrich's remarks in China led to this -- New York
Times, April 4, 1997:
China admonished the United States today to speak with one voice on
foreign policy and accused Newt Gingrich of making ''improper'' statements
on Washington's commitment to defend Taiwan from any military attack by the
mainland.
The criticism was made by the Foreign Ministry spokesman, Shen Guofang,
who earlier this week had expressed basic satisfaction with remarks made by
Mr. Gingrich, the Speaker of the House, during a three-day visit to China.
The visit followed Vice President Al Gore's first trip to Beijing. Both
men spoke on issues of contention between Washington and Beijing, but Mr.
Gingrich's remarks were noteworthy for their directness and for exceeding
the normal State Department formulations on American commitments to Taiwan.
China's decision to criticize Mr. Gingrich came after he traveled to
Taiwan on Wednesday and met with President Lee Teng-hui.
Back then, the media treated Gingrich like he was the American Prime
Minister, and his right-wing supporters had no problem with the House
Speaker travelling and expressing his own foreign policy views which
deviated from the Clinton administration's. Quite the contrary, many
right-wing leaders -- including Grover Norquist, Ralph Reed, and Vin
Weber -- went on PBS and praised Gingrich's "aggressive role in China."
They couldn't have been more pleased that Gingrich did what, in their minds,
the Clinton administration was failing to do -- standing up to the Chinese.
Gingrich, as House Speaker, was heroic for going on his own and doing that.
The same behavior from Pelosi (which I'm sure is, in actuality, completely
different for all sorts of unknown and indiscernible reasons) is now both a
grave political mistake and a reckless breach of protocol.
RHF
> In article <1175838752.153313.272...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>
> RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
> >http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
> >"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
> >http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-...
>
> Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> Dome of the Rock:http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-a...
>
> (I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah,
- I was just sinking to your level.)
Hope you are not affrid of heights. :o)
>
- Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman
- wore a headscarf when in a house of worship!
Go to most Catholic Churches in California where Women
from Mexican are in attendance and they still do.
>
> --
> Please reply to: | "One of the hardest parts of my job is to
> pciszek at panix dot com | connect Iraq to the War on Terror."
> Autoreply is disabled | -- G. W. Bush, 9/7/2006
BUT - For Nancy Pelosi the wearing of "The Hijab" in a Mosque
was about Making-a-Political-Statement.
and yes that is my opinion ~ RHF
.
.
. .
RHF
> Paul Ciszek wrote:
> > In article <1175838752.153313.272...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
> > RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
> >>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
> >>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
> >>http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-...
> >>Islamic Head Scarf =>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
>
> > Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> > Dome of the Rock:
> >http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-a...
>
> > to your level.)
>
> > Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
> > headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
- And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship
- were expected to cover their heads, as well.
But 'da pope' ain't gointa cut off your head if'n you dont.
Or - Claim it is an Insult to Islam and Grounds for a Holy War.
- And then there are those yarmulkes...
Yeah those Yarmulkazi Pilots did wear
those cute little Leader Hats until Death.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kippah
as for me - i wear a rainbow rasta kufi crown ~ RHF
http://champashop.safeshopper.com/134/2634.htm?755
http://cgi.ebay.com/_W0QQitemZ110112259717
{ cause after all i am colorful kind of guy }
.
.
. .
RHF
> "Dana Carpender" <dcarp...@kivanospam.net> wrote in message
>
> news:UMGdnVKJTexI_ovb...@insightbb.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Paul Ciszek wrote:
>
> >> RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >>>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
> >>>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
> >>>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
> >>>Islamic Head Scarf =>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
>
> >> Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
> >> Dome of the Rock:
>
> >> (I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just
> >> sinking
> >> to your level.)
>
> >> Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
> >> headscarf when in a house of worship!
>
> > And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship were expected
> > to cover their heads, as well. And then there are those yarmulkes...
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
WRT - The Amish - If the Hat Fits Wear It ! ~ RHF
.
.
. .
sli...@slidge.com
>
> You cannot debunk a right-wing claim. Evidence is irrelevant to
> faith. I still see the silverware crap fairly frequently.
We could make a fortune selling 'W' keys to Free Republic readers.
"Really, this is one of the 'W' keys that the Clinton people stole from
the White House! Only $10!!"
Like pieces of the True Cross to them...
benrrrrrrrand
wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:22:25 -0400, benrrrrrrrand
><po...@circumstance.org> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 20:51:04 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Oh, a new tack. Well talk about movies instead of Clinton.
>>
>>
>>Just talking about movies that expose and illustrate what a stupid ass
>>Nancy Pelosi is.
>
>No, you talk about movies or Clinton to avoid discussing our President
>and his crack administration.
>
>>So she jus tsaunters into Syria, because you morons hate Bush.
>>
>>Great thinking on your part.
>
>Since you still love him, I have to conclude that you aren't doing any
>thinking at all.
>
>>Should do well for ME peace.
>
>I hope so.
>
>>Oh well.
>>
>>WWIII is right around the corner, Old Nancy with the fake tits is
>>helping it along.
>
>You should spend more time thinking of things other than Clinton,
>movies or her tits, Benrand.
>
>
We're talking about her stupidity.
She's the chief Surrender Monkey, more French than American.
Liberals are proud. But I guess it really doesn't matter a whole lot,
Old Fat Albert is telling me that the US will be under 20 feet of
water in a few years,
And the sky is falling.
Amir Taheri:
The most radical elements in the region liked Pelosi best if only
because she endorsed their campaign of vilification against the Bush
administration. Her motto was: Surrender before you have too, and
claim credit for it! She represented a superpower that, because no one
can take away anything from it, is prepared to give away everything.
The Pelosi Doctrine, as demonstrated during the tour, is the
opposite of the Bush Doctrine spelled out in 2002.
Dana Carpender
RHF wrote:
> On Apr 6, 8:13 am, Dana Carpender <dcarp...@kivanospam.net> wrote:
>
>>Paul Ciszek wrote:
>>
>>>In article <1175838752.153313.272...@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
>>>RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>
>>>>U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wears an Islamic Head Scarf
>>>>http://ginacobb.typepad.com/gina_cobb/2007/04/nancy_pelosi_in.html
>>>>"The Hijab" and Prays inside the Ommayad Mosque in Damascus
>>>>http://www.theneweditor.com/index.php?/archives/5629-Feminist-in-the-...
>>>>Islamic Head Scarf =>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hijab
>>
>>>Pictures of Laura Bush wearing an Islamic Head Scarf when praying in the
>>>Dome of the Rock:
>>>http://www.mahablog.com/2007/04/04/pelosi-wears-scarf-righties-bark-a...
>>
>>>(I seriously doubt either woman actually prayed to Allah, I was just sinking
>>>to your level.)
>>
>>>Worse yet, earilier in this century, *every* Catholic woman wore a
>>>headscarf when in a house of worship!
>>
>
> - And non-Catholic women visiting Catholic houses of worship
> - were expected to cover their heads, as well.
>
> But 'da pope' ain't gointa cut off your head if'n you dont.
> Or - Claim it is an Insult to Islam and Grounds for a Holy War.
>
The Pope won't know. But the members of the church may well consider it
disrespectful.
The point is, it's simple courtesy to cover your head in a house of
worship if that's the custom, and it's only proper that Pelosi did so.
What on earth would have been the point of her being deliberately rude?
Dana
Jeff Lanam
>
> The point is, it's simple courtesy to cover your head in a house of
> worship if that's the custom, and it's only proper that Pelosi did so.
> What on earth would have been the point of her being deliberately rude?
>
> Dana
If she wanted to pretend to be a wingnut?
i_tell_it_l...@yahoo.com
>
> news:1175880355.0...@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Apr 5, 8:15 pm, "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> <saroman0...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:1175803200....@n59g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On Apr 5, 1:45 pm, "Bill Kawalec" <billkawa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >> >> Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a
> >> >> leash
> >> >> on her.
>
>
> >> > But is she as dumb as you?
>
> >> wow! great comeback! I sincerely beleive that's the best you could do,
> >> though.
>
> >> --
> >> I never read email at the Yahoo address!
>
>
> yer azz
>
> based on
>
> > your initial comments.
it is obvious you are Polish by your last name, and you are one who
has led some to label STUPID Polish people, like you Bill, POLACKS!
glad to clue you Polack!
i_tell_it_l...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Apr 2007 15:45:38 -0400, "Bill Kawalec"
>
> <billkawa...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >Nancy Pelosi is dumber than John F-word Kerry, and they oughta put a leash
> >on her.
>
> demanding things no other speaker has ever requested, and then pulls
> this stuff.
>
> I hopr I am wrong.
how so Neal? How is it going to "make it tough for women" running in
the next election? Listen, EWOC Bush didn't have a problem with the
entirely-Repuglinut congregation going over there. And, yes, EWOC
said that he didn't want any more meeting with Assad, because "no
progress has been made". Just another red-herring from the war-loving
cowboy Bush.....
about time the Arabs found out that all americans are not nitwits like
Bush, and the people in his administration!