Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Is Harriet Miers blackmailing George Bush?

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Arizona Bushwhacker

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 10:20:41 AM10/14/05
to
Is Harriet Miers blackmailing George Bush?

She is his lawyer. If anyone has info on Bush
it would be her.

What has she got on Bush that caused him to
nominate someone with zero experience?


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 10:30:50 AM10/14/05
to
"Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBu...@cox.net> wrote in news:P_O3f.75501
$lq6.14926@fed1read01:


Well, she WAS in charge of purging his
National Guard records, remember?


www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/102005/1005.shtml

www.rense.com/general67/choia.htm


Arizona Bushwhacker

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 10:45:30 AM10/14/05
to

"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eene...@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96EF60C85...@216.196.97.131...

> "Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBu...@cox.net> wrote in
news:P_O3f.75501
> $lq6.14926@fed1read01:
>
> > Is Harriet Miers blackmailing George Bush?
> >
> > She is his lawyer. If anyone has info on Bush
> > it would be her.
> >
> > What has she got on Bush that caused him to
> > nominate someone with zero experience?
>
>
> Well, she WAS in charge of purging his
> National Guard records, remember?

I would rather see her go before a Grand Jury and
answer real questions, rather than watch the Senate
hand her softball questions that she wont answer.

>
>
>
>
> www.vermontguardian.com/dailies/102005/1005.shtml
>
> www.rense.com/general67/choia.htm
>
>


Mitchell Holman

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 11:17:16 AM10/14/05
to
"Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBu...@cox.net> wrote in
news:4mP3f.75617$lq6.42289@fed1read01:

>
> "Mitchell Holman" <ta2eene...@comcast.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns96EF60C85...@216.196.97.131...
>> "Arizona Bushwhacker" <ArizonaBu...@cox.net> wrote in
> news:P_O3f.75501
>> $lq6.14926@fed1read01:
>>
>> > Is Harriet Miers blackmailing George Bush?
>> >
>> > She is his lawyer. If anyone has info on Bush
>> > it would be her.
>> >
>> > What has she got on Bush that caused him to
>> > nominate someone with zero experience?
>>
>>
>> Well, she WAS in charge of purging his
>> National Guard records, remember?
>
> I would rather see her go before a Grand Jury and
> answer real questions, rather than watch the Senate
> hand her softball questions that she wont answer.
>

Indeed.

Did you catch that House committee grilling
FEMA's "Brownie". Classic stuff. Every response
was "That's not FEMA's job" and "How dare you
insult the hardworking people at FEMA" and "I'll
have to look that up."

What a weasel.

Arizona Bushwhacker

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 11:31:24 AM10/14/05
to

"Mitchell Holman" <ta2eene...@comcast.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96EF68A8...@216.196.97.131...

What about the last SCOTUS nomination.
He was coached in how to best not answer
questions. The network news reported that
his strategy would be to evade the questions.
When it came time to answer the Senate's
softball questions he didn't.

And everyone is happy.

>
>
>


Furious George

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 11:34:44 AM10/14/05
to

I don't like your attitude. It's time to play ball and the President
is pitching and your fly is down. Why do you have to be so difficult?
It's not that hard. Just stand up, say "I think the President is doing
a damn fine job.", sit down and shut your mouth.

>
>
> >
> >
> >

Arizona Bushwhacker

unread,
Oct 14, 2005, 11:47:50 AM10/14/05
to

"Furious George" <bugm...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1129304084.9...@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...

Darn!
And I was so wanting you to like me!

Well, I guess I will just have to try harder to make
you fucking republicans like me, wont I.

0 new messages