Should the affluent pay for health care?
Middle Class Warrior
1980s.
Get lost
Idiot. You can't have universal health care and exclude anyone so
make up your stupid liberal mind.
Middle Class Warrior
Just ignore him. NBF aka Horatio is an old narcissist with ADD.
Neolibertarian
It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree with your criminal
mouth, nor even how many conspire with you to commit larceny, it's still
larceny.
Surviving your theft is the real trick 99, of course. There's nothing
about you or your friends to indicate you can.
Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
--
Neolibertarian
"Nobody inherits civilisation.
� You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation.
� Beginning with yourself.
� And you can't even afford its heating bill."
---Dennnis M. Hammes
--
Neolibertarian
"Nobody inherits civilisation.
� You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation.
� Beginning with yourself.
� And you can't even afford its heating bill."
---Dennnis M. Hammes
Bret Cahill
>
> > No question about it. The GOP had been coddling the affluent since the
> > 1980s.
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/ykpoo86
>
> It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree
So Repugliars have given up picking up any seats in '10?
Bret Cahill
W Spilman
"Neolibertarian" <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:b9774$4b04bf38$18f55223$19...@allthenewsgroups.com...
> In article <4b04a378$0$32675$ec3e...@news.usenetmonster.com>,
> Middle Class Warrior <right...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> No question about it. The GOP had been coddling the affluent since the
>> 1980s.
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/ykpoo86
>
> It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree with your criminal
> mouth, nor even how many conspire with you to commit larceny, it's still
> larceny.
You can opt out. Move somewhere else, cheapshit.
WS
Bert Byfield
>> since the 1980s.
> It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree with your
> criminal mouth, nor even how many conspire with you to commit
> larceny, it's still larceny.
> Surviving your theft is the real trick 99, of course. There's
> nothing about you or your friends to indicate you can.
> Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
You are no libertarian. You are a plain ole nazi, only slightly more
human than Topaz.
Sean
IF they can pay for some drugs or treatment then -- YES sure
IF they can't pay the Bills because they are dirt poor -- then NO
And if the Dirt Poor can't Afford the Health Insurance Premiums, and they
can't get it thru their empl;oyer -- then NO
Should the affluent pay for health care?
YES definitely -- their own personal out of pocket costs and their Insurance
costs, OR be penalised via the Tax System for taking excessive risk of the
burden falling to the Government/Taxpayer.
Health care IS a Policy issue and a Federal Giovernment Law issue, and a Fed
Govt responsibility Budget Issue.
How that gets decided usually comes from a debate and discussion based upon
detailed knowledge and research and hard facts -- which then gets VOTED on
by the Politicians .. wiothin the Constituion.
People vote in the Politicians to ACT and VOTE in Congress on their
behalf -- like how simple is that?
Why these matters are SO not grasped by otherwise funticioning human beings
is well, beyond me.
or Die?
"Bret Cahill" <BretC...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:5ebfcffa-101a-4e4e...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
Neolibertarian
Bert Byfield <bertb...@nospam.not> wrote:
> >> No question about it. The GOP had been coddling the affluent
> >> since the 1980s.
>
> > It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree with your
> > criminal mouth, nor even how many conspire with you to commit
> > larceny, it's still larceny.
> > Surviving your theft is the real trick 99, of course. There's
> > nothing about you or your friends to indicate you can.
> > Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
>
> You are no libertarian.
True.
> You are a plain ole nazi,
Words mean things.
> only slightly more
> human than Topaz.
Don't kid yourself.
Neolibertarian
"W Spilman" <w...@knows.com> wrote:
Sorry, you've made it nearly impossible for me to opt in, much less opt
out now...if you change the rules again.
You see, you've shaped the market with ludicrous regulations and
taxation. The only practical way to purchase health insurance these days
is though our employers.
"We" won't be opting in or opting out. It's up to our employers. Since
you tax our employers with the most progressive tax code in the
Industrial World, they'll undoubtedly opt in in order to save a buck or
two.
Isn't that what you wanted, all along?
> Move somewhere else, cheapshit.
Princess having a feelwing at me?
Neolibertarian
<5ebfcffa-101a-4e4e...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Bret Cahill <BretC...@aol.com> wrote:
The trick is to survive the larceny.
You're not taking any steps to do so.
Bert Byfield
>>> nothing about you or your friends to indicate you can.
>>> Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
>> You are no libertarian.
> True.
>> You are a plain ole nazi,
> Words mean things.
nazi = "might is right" and "everything my country does is right"
>> only slightly more human than Topaz.
> Don't kid yourself.
You consider yourself more of a barbarian that Topaz is???
Neolibertarian
Moonpie <mr_rc_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:02:17 +1100, "Sean" <he...@home.net> wrote:
>
> >Should the dirt poor pay for health care?
>
>
> Every single American should contribute equally.
Why is that?
> A certain percentage
> of their "income", whatever that is. Hypothetically, .1% or .o1% or
> whatever would be required.
Required by whom?
>
> You wanna play, you pay.
That's the system that already exists. You want to destroy it, so that
you can replace it with an identical system?
Oh yeah. Under the new system, "everybody pays" will actually mean
"everybody pays the government."
I see.
> Obviously someone with a net income of a few
> grand a year, or less, is only gonna end up paying a few pennies a
> year.. and probably only see that, as a couple pennies "deducted" from
> a tax return. If they even pay taxes. Maybe a few pennies deducted
> from a welfare check, or something.
>
> But to me, thats fair. Everybody pays.
"Everybody pays" isn't the system that's being proposed.
The system that's being proposed is a giant Rube Goldberg--built only to
distract you from the collapse of Medicare--and the subsequent transfer
of all Medicare recipients to the new "Public Option."
You see, the reason "doing nothing isn't an option" is quite simple.
Doing nothing means that Medicare goes bankrupt. Out there in public,
where no one can miss it; where no one can pretend it's "running
surpluses."
If Medicare went bankrupt, as the trustees have been warning us for
years, then We the People would want to know why.
That's why doing nothing is not an option.
Neolibertarian
Bert Byfield <bertb...@nospam.not> wrote:
> >>> Surviving your theft is the real trick 99, of course. There's
> >>> nothing about you or your friends to indicate you can.
> >>> Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
>
> >> You are no libertarian.
>
> > True.
>
> >> You are a plain ole nazi,
>
> > Words mean things.
>
> nazi = "might is right" and "everything my country does is right"
You're not a magician. You can't change the meaning of words just by
chanting your magic spells over them.
You're never gonna learn what you need to know until you begin to
understand words and their meanings.
Besides, you're the one who admitted he believes in the value of "might
makes right." You said so just a few posts above.
In addition to not being a magician, you're also not a baby in a
highchair: you can't have it both ways.
Quit pretending to yourself.
gavino
more people would be affluent without communism
and if dems want charity, just give cash to people, don't soak
everyone
dems have this problem with leaving people alone
expiring tax cut is raising taxes
deficit spending is creating taxes that bear interest as dem congress
did under reagan
capitalism works, just get out of the way!
why am I taxed on an investment if i have already paid taxes when I
got my paycheck? eg capital gains? makes no sense
and penalizes capital accumulation
why do we let fed photocopy money? same effect as if i did it, but I
goto jail for obvious reasons
fed will photocopy trillions more than obama has let them, and they
make deal with foriegn banks
a government agency making bills but without voter control very scary
why doesnt obama take some nasa people and make very good trains on
earth and take GM stuff which governmetn owns and sell cars?
if guna be good commy then at least try and produce with a
collectivist method, make real products
gavino
gavino
> In article <Xns9CC87DE0B3339bbyfield34caravel...@216.196.97.131>,
commies should take cash from thier wallet and give to bums
simple
leave rest alone
Bert Byfield
>>> True.
>>>> You are a plain ole nazi,
>>> Words mean things.
>> nazi = "might is right" and "everything my country does is right"
> You're not a magician. You can't change the meaning of words just
> by chanting your magic spells over them.
Whatever. By the dictionary, the word means "Derogatory term for a
person who is fanatically dedicated to, or seeks to control, some
activity, practice, etc." I have just added a practical elaboration
on the general meaning.
> You're never gonna learn what you need to know until you begin to
> understand words and their meanings.
Pontificating again...
> Besides, you're the one who admitted he believes in the value of
> "might makes right." You said so just a few posts above.
Nope.
> In addition to not being a magician, you're also not a baby in a
> highchair: you can't have it both ways.
> Quit pretending to yourself.
You're getting crotchety in your old age.
stmarysbloodycunthole
PAJAMA DIAPERPANTS GOADED INTO THOUSANDS OF SILLY PEDOPHILE POSTS,
BECAUSE HE IS A PEDOPHILE AND LOVES TO RAPE LITTLE BOYS ASSES!!!!!!!!!!
f. barnes
I think the affluent should buy me a bigger house and gobs of lottery
tickets. And a new SUV for Christmas wouldn't hurt.
cop welfare
> Should the dirt poor pay for health care?
>
> IF they can pay for some drugs or treatment then -- YES sure
>
> IF they can't pay the Bills because they are dirt poor -- then NO
>
> And if the Dirt Poor can't Afford the Health Insurance Premiums, and they
> can't get it thru their empl;oyer -- then NO
>
> Should the affluent pay for health care?
>
> YES definitely -- their own personal out of pocket costs and their Insurance
> costs, OR be penalised via the Tax System for taking excessive risk of the
> burden falling to the Government/Taxpayer.
>
> Health care IS a Policy issue and a Federal Giovernment Law issue, and a Fed
> Govt responsibility Budget Issue.
>
> How that gets decided usually comes from a debate and discussion based upon
> detailed knowledge and research and hard facts -- which then gets VOTED on
> by the Politicians .. wiothin the Constituion.
>
> People vote in the Politicians to ACT and VOTE in Congress on their
> behalf -- like how simple is that?
>
> Why these matters are SO not grasped by otherwise funticioning human beings
> is well, beyond me.
>
> or Die?
>
>
> news:5ebfcffa-101a-4e4e...@k13g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Middle Class Warrior <rightar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > No question about it. The GOP had been coddling the affluent since the
> > > 1980s.
>
> > >http://tinyurl.com/ykpoo86
>
> > It doesn't matter how many of your friends agree
>
> So Repugliars have given up picking up any seats in '10?
>
> Bret Cahill
naow, naow, NAOW!
a thousand times, NAOW!
the affluent should NEVER have to pay for medical care!
they have too much MONEY!
unscrupulous doctors will persist in taking advantage of them until
they're stuck on life support, unconscious, into their eighties...
with all their hip-replacements, hair-transplants, heart-transplants,
kidney-transplants,
etc., etc....
how do you expect ppl to spend their lives helping the miserable out
of their ignorance when they're constantly keeping hospital
appointments?
why, eventually they'll all just get tired and "shrug"!
hahahahahaha
hahahahahaha
hahahahahaha
hahahahahaha
hahahahahaha
Michael Gordge
> Should the dirt poor pay for health care?
It is their very own moral decision to make and theirs alone, what
they chose to pay or not pay for is no-one's fucking businesss but
theirs, so keep your fucking nose out of their fucking business and
for once in your pathetic parasitical leftist life mind your own
fucking health care business and leave others alone to mind theirs.
If ewe feel that they need your help to pay for their health care,
then just shut the fuck up and stop wasting your money and time
posting your leftist crap here, and put your money where you pretend
your fucking mouth is and help them.
MG
Sean
"Michael Gordge" <mikeg...@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
news:86814ba0-77cd-4f08...@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
MG
-------
Dearest Mickey .....
It is my very own moral decision to choose what I will say and what I won't
say, and when I want to say it .... and it is MINE alnoe to make such
choices .. SO ... it is no-one's fucking businesss but MINE, so keep your
fucking nose out of MY fucking business and for once in your pathetic
parasitical CONTROL FREAK EXISTENCE mind your own fucking business and
leave others alone to mind theirs.
NOW YOU MAY DUELY just Fuck Off you Opinionated Little Pencil Dick You .....
!
ROFL
------
So, how did I do Mickey? Good?
Neolibertarian
"Sean" <he...@home.net> wrote:
Heh.
Whoda thunk that your "moral decision" to post to Usenet would have such
consequences?
Neolibertarian
Moonpie <mr_rc_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:51:18 -0600, Neolibertarian
> <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> >
> >"Everybody pays" isn't the system that's being proposed.
> >
> >The system that's being proposed is a giant Rube Goldberg-
>
>
> the system thats being proposed sounds like a load of shit to me, and
> its simply more of the classic liberal class warfare.... just make
> "the rich" pay for it all.
>
> well, in my opinion, fuck that.
>
> everybody should pay.
>
> its not gonna happen, not ever.
>
> I dont care.
Your liberty has to be earned.
First, you need to discover what liberty is, and why it's worth earning.
Just a tip from your Friendly Neighborhood Neolibertarian.
Neolibertarian
Bert Byfield <bertb...@nospam.not> wrote:
> >>>> You are no libertarian.
>
> >>> True.
>
> >>>> You are a plain ole nazi,
>
> >>> Words mean things.
>
> >> nazi = "might is right" and "everything my country does is right"
>
> > You're not a magician. You can't change the meaning of words just
> > by chanting your magic spells over them.
>
> Whatever. By the dictionary, the word means "Derogatory term for a
> person who is fanatically dedicated to, or seeks to control, some
> activity, practice, etc." I have just added a practical elaboration
> on the general meaning.
No, you're diluting the meaning so much that the word doesn't mean
/anything/ anymore.
The problem with nazism is that it's so damn popular. It's popular with
farmers, industrialists, the working poor and middle classes. Everybody.
>
> > You're never gonna learn what you need to know until you begin to
> > understand words and their meanings.
>
> Pontificating again...
What makes you think I ever stopped?
>
> > Besides, you're the one who admitted he believes in the value of
> > "might makes right." You said so just a few posts above.
>
> Nope.
It's in the other thread:
I pointed out:
"Americans, in general, are a bloodthirsty, warlike people. And they
always have been."
And you replied:
"Without that bad attitude there would be no America."
That's either saying "might makes right," or it's saying "might made
America."
Which, of course, is the same thing. Unless you're proposing a
revolution.
Which, as you know, would be claiming "might makes right."
Unless you're proposing a "non-violent, voluntary revolution," which in
turn would mean you're not proposing a revolution at all.
>
> > In addition to not being a magician, you're also not a baby in a
> > highchair: you can't have it both ways.
> > Quit pretending to yourself.
>
> You're getting crotchety in your old age.
Eh? What'd ya say? It seems I must have dozed off again...
cop welfare
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:45:48 -0600, Neolibertarian
>
>
>
>
>
> <cognac...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >In article <4b067ee7$0$5420$afc38...@news.optusnet.com.au>,
> > "Sean" <h...@home.net> wrote:
>
> >> "Michael Gordge" <mikegor...@xtra.co.nz> wrote in message
> >>news:86814ba0-77cd-4f08...@z3g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Nov 19, 3:02 pm, "Sean" <h...@home.net> wrote:
> >> > Should the dirt poor pay for health care?
>
> >> It is their very own moral decision to make and theirs alone, what
> >> they chose to pay or not pay for is no-one's fucking businesss but
> >> theirs, so keep your fucking nose out of their fucking business and
> >> for once in your pathetic parasitical leftist life mind your own
> >> fucking health care business and leave others alone to mind theirs.
>
> >> If ewe feel that they need your help to pay for their health care,
> >> then just shut the fuck up and stop wasting your money and time
> >> posting your leftist crap here, and put your money where you pretend
> >> your fucking mouth is and help them.
>
> >> MG
> >> -------
>
> >> Dearest Mickey .....
>
> >> It is my very own moral decision to choose what I will say and what I won't
> >> say, and when I want to say it .... and it is MINE alnoe to make such
> >> choices .. SO ... it is no-one's fucking businesss but MINE, so keep your
> >> fucking nose out of MY fucking business and for once in your pathetic
> >> parasitical CONTROL FREAK EXISTENCE mind your own fucking business and
> >> leave others alone to mind theirs.
>
> >Heh.
>
> >Whoda thunk that your "moral decision" to post to Usenet would have such
> >consequences?
>
> work and spends hours on the computer, using electricity, to blame
> everybody else on global warming.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
say, moonpie...if his dog shits in yer yard...
are you in favor of land rape?
Bert Byfield
>>> of "might makes right." You said so just a few posts above.
>> Nope.
> It's in the other thread:
> I pointed out:
> "Americans, in general, are a bloodthirsty, warlike people. And
> they always have been."
> And you replied:
> "Without that bad attitude there would be no America."
> That's either saying "might makes right," or it's saying "might
> made America."
The second meaning is correct. I was not approving nor disapproving,
just stating a historical fact.
> Which, of course, is the same thing. Unless you're proposing a
> revolution.
No way.
> Which, as you know, would be claiming "might makes right."
Yes. But I don't approve of political revolutions, except against
foreign invaders or against truly insufferable domestic tyrants.
> Unless you're proposing a "non-violent, voluntary revolution,"
> which in turn would mean you're not proposing a revolution at all.
Right. No revolution. Like the Beatle's song on the subject. A whole
lot of people get killed and probably nothing is improved. Or like
the infamous Russian "revolution" where things got a lot worse after
the "revolution" (coup).
cop welfare
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:11:43 -0800 (PST), cop welfare
> interested in it.
>
> we'll leave the porch light on for you.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
ANSWER THE QUESTION, WHY DONCHA?
yer playground comebacks don't compute in adult life.
Sean
"Neolibertarian" <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:7d929$4b06b94f$18f55223$30...@allthenewsgroups.com...
C'est la karma mon ami :)
LOL
[ you did read what mickey wrote right, and got the joke yes? /no ? ]
cop welfare
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:06:59 -0800 (PST), cop welfare
>
> >yer playground comebacks don't compute in adult life.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
"why dont you fuck off?" - you
keep the same nick and don't say anything stupid and i'll try.
'yer playground comebacks don't compute in adult life.' - me
"adult life! ROFL! you're nothing but words on a computer screen." -
you
a little callous, don't you think?
aren't you going to apologise, now?
Neolibertarian
Dean <DeanTu...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> In article <55f47$4b06b9bd$18f55223$30...@allthenewsgroups.com>,
> Neolibertarian
> says...
> >
> >In article <bmfbg5da55dj7gno6...@4ax.com>,
> > Moonpie <mr_rc_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:51:18 -0600, Neolibertarian
> >> <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Everybody pays" isn't the system that's being proposed.
> >> >
> >> >The system that's being proposed is a giant Rube Goldberg-
> >>
> >>
> >> the system thats being proposed sounds like a load of shit to me, and
> >> its simply more of the classic liberal class warfare.... just make
> >> "the rich" pay for it all.
> >>
> >> well, in my opinion, fuck that.
> >>
> >> everybody should pay.
> >>
> >> its not gonna happen, not ever.
> >>
> >> I dont care.
> >
> >Your liberty has to be earned.
> >
> >First, you need to discover what liberty is, and why it's worth earning.
> >
> >Just a tip from your Friendly Neighborhood Neolibertarian.
>
> Sounds like right-winged bullshit from both sides, here.
Kid, my views make all your "right-wingers" seem like Maoists.
> Right-wingers are a cancer to America.
http://elihu.envy.nu/NeoPics/Sounds/Christine_pleads.wav
Neolibertarian
Moonpie <mr_rc_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:47:39 -0600, Neolibertarian
> <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <bmfbg5da55dj7gno6...@4ax.com>,
> > Moonpie <mr_rc_...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:51:18 -0600, Neolibertarian
> >> <cogn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Everybody pays" isn't the system that's being proposed.
> >> >
> >> >The system that's being proposed is a giant Rube Goldberg-
> >>
> >>
> >> the system thats being proposed sounds like a load of shit to me, and
> >> its simply more of the classic liberal class warfare.... just make
> >> "the rich" pay for it all.
> >>
> >> well, in my opinion, fuck that.
> >>
> >> everybody should pay.
> >>
> >> its not gonna happen, not ever.
> >>
> >> I dont care.
> >
> >Your liberty has to be earned.
>
>
> .. and all along I thought healthcare was a divine right.
The point being; "Everybody pays" is an inescapable law of the universe.
Neolibertarian
Bert Byfield <bertb...@nospam.not> wrote:
> >>> Besides, you're the one who admitted he believes in the value
> >>> of "might makes right." You said so just a few posts above.
>
> >> Nope.
>
> > It's in the other thread:
>
> > I pointed out:
> > "Americans, in general, are a bloodthirsty, warlike people. And
> > they always have been."
>
> > And you replied:
> > "Without that bad attitude there would be no America."
> > That's either saying "might makes right," or it's saying "might
> > made America."
>
> The second meaning is correct. I was not approving nor disapproving,
> just stating a historical fact.
>
> > Which, of course, is the same thing. Unless you're proposing a
> > revolution.
>
> No way.
>
> > Which, as you know, would be claiming "might makes right."
>
> Yes. But I don't approve of political revolutions, except against
> foreign invaders or against truly insufferable domestic tyrants.
Any tyrant is insufferable, of course.
>
> > Unless you're proposing a "non-violent, voluntary revolution,"
> > which in turn would mean you're not proposing a revolution at all.
>
> Right. No revolution. Like the Beatle's song on the subject. A whole
> lot of people get killed and probably nothing is improved. Or like
> the infamous Russian "revolution" where things got a lot worse after
> the "revolution" (coup).
They were 20-something millionaires when they wrote that song.
Lennon may have been a Maoist, but only enough of one to ease his
confused conscience.
Middle Class Warrior
> In article <4b04a378$0$32675$ec3e2...@news.usenetmonster.com>,
> Middle Class Warrior <rightar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > No question about it. The GOP had been coddling the affluent since the
> > 1980s.
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/ykpoo86
>
> mouth, nor even how many conspire with you to commit larceny, it's still
> larceny.
>
> Surviving your theft is the real trick 99, of course. There's nothing
> about you or your friends to indicate you can.
>
> Just an observation from your Friendly Neighborhood Libertarian.
>
> Neolibertarian
>
> "Nobody inherits civilisation.
> You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation.
> Beginning with yourself.
> And you can't even afford its heating bill."
> ---Dennnis M. Hammes
>
> --
> Neolibertarian
>
> "Nobody inherits civilisation.
> You inherit the /ruins/ of civilisation.
> Beginning with yourself.
> And you can't even afford its heating bill."
> ---Dennnis M. Hammes
Libertarians are irrelevant. Only two per cent of Americans are dumb
enough to buy into that crock 'o shit. Republicans don even like the
pacifist side of conservatism.
Neolibertarian
<12bf136f-9075-438e...@u7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
And how. Most of them are just plain loons.
> Only two per cent of Americans are dumb
> enough to buy into that crock 'o shit.
I'm surprised is that high of a percent!
> Republicans don even like the
> pacifist side of conservatism.
Yawell, why are you telling all this to ME?
stmarysbloodycunthole
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2009 09:11:43 -0800 (PST), cop welfare
>
>
>
>
>
> <cop.welf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> interested in it.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
it might be labrador dog shit, my dog ate my stash man, so if it's
that, then it's good