They've Been Right Before...
F.E.P.O.
Enquirer: Denise Rich in White House Sex Trysts With Clinton
The National Enquirer, which has been beating the mainstream press lately with
scoops on Jesse Jackson's love child and Hugh Rodham's Pardongate payoffs, is
set to report that Denise Rich and Bill Clinton used the White House for sexual
liaisons.
"CLINTON & DENISE RICH LOVE AFFAIR EXPOSED!," blared the headline on the
Enquirer's website late Thursday, with the subhead: "Their Romantic White House
Nights."
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2001/3/1/195948
--
For Educational Purposes Only
"We Post, You Deride"
{...and We don't care....}
** In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is
distributed, without profit, for research or educational purposes. Best effort
is made to credit the original news source.
F.E.P.O.
secret service bail bonding jenna bridges' story...
F.E.P.O.ette
Steven D. Litvintchouk
>
> Thursday Mar. 1, 2001; 9:01 p.m. EST
>
> Enquirer: Denise Rich in White House Sex Trysts With Clinton
>
> The National Enquirer, which has been beating the mainstream press lately with
> scoops on Jesse Jackson's love child and Hugh Rodham's Pardongate payoffs, is
> set to report that Denise Rich and Bill Clinton used the White House for sexual
> liaisons.
Why is it news that Clinton had yet another affair?
Is it news when the birds fly and the fish swim?
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: s...@mitre.org
Disclaimer: As far as I am aware, the opinions expressed
herein
are not those of my employer.
Widdle Dubya
<YEGMLD...@spammotel.com> wrote:
>Thursday Mar. 1, 2001; 9:01 p.m. EST
>
>Enquirer: Denise Rich in White House Sex Trysts With Clinton
>
>The National Enquirer, which has been beating the mainstream press lately with
>scoops on Jesse Jackson's love child and Hugh Rodham's Pardongate payoffs, is
>set to report that Denise Rich and Bill Clinton used the White House for sexual
>liaisons.
>
>"CLINTON & DENISE RICH LOVE AFFAIR EXPOSED!," blared the headline on the
>Enquirer's website late Thursday, with the subhead: "Their Romantic White House
>Nights."
>
>http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2001/3/1/195948
Now your using the National Enquirer as a source.
Can you sink any lower?
Let me guess:
This story ran right under the headline:
"MAN MARRIES BOWLING BALL!!!!"
And just over:
"BOY TRAPPED IN REFRIGERATOR EATS OWN FOOT TO SURVIVE!!"
Mark Metzler
> Now your using the National Enquirer as a source.
>
> Can you sink any lower?
The Republicans haven't sunk anywhere. They have always been really low.
They just spent the last 2 years
howling about Bill Clinton's anatomy.
But as long as they spend more time reading the National Enquirer than the
Wall Street Journal, we should have no
problem booting them out in the next election..
***********************
Countdown to booting out the rancid right in the next election!!!
All it will take is 5 more votes!!!
F.E.P.O.
interesting 'collateral' for a quid pro quo...
Had it been anyone else, Steven, you'd be right -- nothing new and no news.
F.E.P.O.
F.E.P.O.
New York Times & CNN?
...just as the Hugh Rodham story was....
Deal with it. You're losing it, Widdle-one...
F.E.P.O.
"Widdle Dubya" <widdl...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Now your [sic] using the National Enquirer as a source.
[NOC snipped]
Steven D. Litvintchouk
>
> In this case, because the affair is with Marc Rich's 'wife.' At the least, and
> interesting 'collateral' for a quid pro quo...
Even if Bill Clinton and Denise Rich were romantically involved, it
would be difficult to prove that had anything to do with Bill Clinton's
granting of a pardon to Marc Rich, unless one of them confessed. The
money trail, OTOH, is evidence enough.
Steven D. Litvintchouk
>
> >
> > Now your using the National Enquirer as a source.
> >
> > Can you sink any lower?
>
> The Republicans haven't sunk anywhere. They have always been really low.
> They just spent the last 2 years
> howling about Bill Clinton's anatomy.
>
> But as long as they spend more time reading the National Enquirer than the
> Wall Street Journal, we should have no
> problem booting them out in the next election..
And this from the party that cheered on Larry Flynt's "outing" of
Republicans?
Bad as the National Enquirer is, Larry Flynt is worse.
It's a LONG way till the next election.
Bush will have his entire program passed by then, at the rate he's
going.
Diddly Whoot
Jesus think of old Hills trying to have a little lesbo fun with a Pussie
Pussy!! Now that will put ya of your food.
NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - A cancer-causing virus seen most often in AIDS
(news - web sites) patients can be spread to women through shared needles
and sexual activity with others carrying the virus, according to a report.
Human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) is the most common cause of cancer in AIDS
patients and in some African countries and often causes cancer in transplant
patients, according to Dr. Philip Pellet from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (news - web sites) in Atlanta, Georgia, and
associates.
Before this study, published in the March 1st issue of The New England
Journal of Medicine (news - web sites), little was known about how HHV-8 is
passed to women. The authors, therefore, examined risk factors for HHV-8
infection in 1,295 women who reported high-risk sexual behavior--a high
number of male sex partners in their lifetime, a young age at first
intercourse, a history of sex for money, or drug use.
About one woman in six tested positive for HHV-8. Women who used injection
drugs were three times as likely as women who never injected drugs to have
an HHV-8 infection, the report indicates. Smoking crack cocaine, though, was
not linked to the presence of HHV-8 infection.
Although high-risk sexual activity was not linked to the overall risk of
HHV-8 infection, the researchers note, women who did not inject drugs did
face a higher risk of HHV-8 infection if they had more than 50 male sex
partners, had sex with a bisexual man, had genital herpes, engaged in sex
for money, or had evidence of syphilis.
``Accumulated evidence indicates that the predominant route of HHV-8
transmission in the US is sexual,'' Pellet told Reuters Health. ``Our study
does not contradict that, but indicates that an additional route can be via
blood contact among injection drug users.''
Does this mean people need to be concerned about blood transfusions? ``No
evidence has been found to date for HHV-8 transmission via blood
transfusions or blood products,'' Pellet said, ``but larger studies are
being done to assess whether this might occur infrequently.''
SOURCE: The New England Journal of Medicine 2001;344:636-643.
Email this story - View most popular | Printer-friendly format
King Pineapple
Mark Metzler <mmet...@pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:tlGn6.128$P9.1...@news.pacbell.net...
>
> But as long as they spend more time reading the National Enquirer than the
> Wall Street Journal, we should have no
> problem booting them out in the next election..
LOL, that's what you told us you would do in the LAST election...
What did Clinton "win" again?
King Pineapple
F.E.P.O. <YEGMLD...@spammotel.com> wrote in message
news:YuGn6.326716$ge4.11...@news2.rdc2.tx.home.com...
>
> Deal with it. You're losing it, Widdle-one...
Don't get Widdle Shithead pissed, or he's gonna start posting "Helen
Highwater's" vote "counts" from Florida again. A lot of good that did...ask
him why he relies on a site that also sells gay sex videos to keep himself
informed on politics....
Widdle Dubya
Let me guess:
"MAN MARRIES BOWLING BALL!!!!"
And just over:
"your" rather than the correct "you're" in my post; good catch from
someone with an Enquiring Mind.
My Enquirer slam is designed to point out how people, here and
elsewhere, will use any source in a lame attempt to bolster their
position.
For example, as Steve noted elsewhere in this thread, the democrats
used Hustler magazine, which, in my opinion, is certainly as low a
source as the Enquirer.
Reminds me of a scam a buddy of mind used in college:
He theorized that when meeting a young lady in a bar if he told her he
was a photographer for Playboy magazine, she would never believe him.
So, he spent twenty bucks and got some business cards printed up that
said he was. Complete with the Playboy bunny.
Instant creditability: the power of the printed word.
bill
widdl...@nospam.com wrote:
I wondered who wrote that stuff. too funny.
Widdle Dubya
Two terms as President of The United States
Widdle Dubya
That again....
Hey, KP, I've asked you several times if you were serious about that.
I can't seem to find any of the porn you keep mentioning associated
with Helen's site.
If it's true, tell me where to find the connection; I'd really like to
know.
F.E.P.O.
Burma Shave
F.E.P.O.
Widdle Dubya
At least you're sounding more intelligent.
rave on!
news:3A9F4D1D...@mitre.org...
> "F.E.P.O." wrote:
> >
> > In this case, because the affair is with Marc Rich's 'wife.' At the
least, and
> > interesting 'collateral' for a quid pro quo...
>
> Even if Bill Clinton and Denise Rich were romantically involved, it
> would be difficult to prove that had anything to do with Bill Clinton's
> granting of a pardon to Marc Rich, unless one of them confessed. The
> money trail, OTOH, is evidence enough.
>
how you guys on the dark side will use any opportunity to wallow in your
stale wank.
r.s.
JD
"rave on!" <rsha...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:9TWn6.1448$Ey1.1...@bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
and power to hide the illegal activities (rape, influence peddling, etc.)
John
Ed
George W. Bush, his mother and father, and Al Gore are distant royal
cousins.
Also from the National Equirer lol.
http://www.nationalenquirer.com/allthebuzz/allthebuzz.cfm?instanceid=8563
"F.E.P.O." <YEGMLD...@spammotel.com> wrote in message
news:uQEn6.326008$ge4.11...@news2.rdc2.tx.home.com...
TCarr13397
>news:3A9F4D1D...@mitre.org...
>> "F.E.P.O." wrote:
>> >
>> > In this case, because the affair is with Marc Rich's 'wife.' At the
>least, and
>> > interesting 'collateral' for a quid pro quo...
>>
>> Even if Bill Clinton and Denise Rich were romantically involved, it
>> would be difficult to prove that had anything to do with Bill Clinton's
>> granting of a pardon to Marc Rich, unless one of them confessed. The
>> money trail, OTOH, is evidence enough.
>>
"rave on!" rsha...@worldnet.att.net
>gee, and here all along I thought 'it wasn't about sex.'
What part of the above quote " The
money trail, OTOH, is evidence enough." makes you think "its" about sex?
just goes to show
>how you guys on the dark side will use any opportunity to wallow in your
>stale wank.
>
"just goes to show" that even some clinton supporters apparently support the
Rich pardon
Congrats on your minority position..within your own party
T.Carr
Mitchell Holman
}
}>
}Actually, to the guys on the Dark Side (the Democrats), it is all
}about sex, money and power to hide the illegal activities (rape,
}influence peddling, etc.)
}
And the guys on the Crooked Side (Republicans) it is all
about looting the country for all the money and power you
can squeeze out of it and then leave the bankrupted mess for
a democrat to clean up. It's 1928 all over again...............
Mitchell Holman
"Selfish men have always tried to skim the cream of our
national wealth in order to satify their own greed, and their
instrument in this effort has always been the Republican Party."
President Harry Truman, Aug 1948
rave on!
news:pZWn6.16$l5....@news1.iquest.net...
r.s.
Furplay
regarded as "legitimate press". A this rate, we'll have a snake-handler
giving the daily prayer on the Senate floor soon.
bill
mhi...@ALL.SPAMMERS.WILL.DIE.radiks.net wrote:
> A totally fucking sad time for America when the NATIONAL ENQUIRER is
> regarded as "legitimate press". A this rate, we'll have a snake-handler
> giving the daily prayer on the Senate floor soon.
Yeah liberal media's search for ratings not facts or balance or objectivity.
Watch FOX news.
They skewer both sides
bill
<BFF77F26DBB23902.ED91C321...@lp.airnews.net>,
ta2...@airmail.net (Mitchell Holman) wrote:
> In article <pZWn6.16$l5....@news1.iquest.net>, "JD" <dy...@jdyson.com> wrote:
> }
> }>
> }Actually, to the guys on the Dark Side (the Democrats), it is all
> }about sex, money and power to hide the illegal activities (rape,
> }influence peddling, etc.)
> }
>
> And the guys on the Crooked Side (Republicans) it is all
> about looting the country for all the money and power you
> can squeeze out of it and then leave the bankrupted mess for
> a democrat to clean up. It's 1928 all over again...............
>
>
> Mitchell Holman
Pure unadulterated bullshit.
democRATs loot the country. TAXes big boy.
Power? hah!! see clintons.
Yeah like the one Carter left Reagan.
Clinton left BUSH.
Mitchell Holman
}In article
}<BFF77F26DBB23902.ED91C321...@lp.airnews.net>,
}ta2...@airmail.net (Mitchell Holman) wrote:
}
}> In article <pZWn6.16$l5....@news1.iquest.net>, "JD" <dy...@jdyson.com>
} wrote:
}> }
}> }>
}> }Actually, to the guys on the Dark Side (the Democrats), it is all
}> }about sex, money and power to hide the illegal activities (rape,
}> }influence peddling, etc.)
}> }
}>
}> And the guys on the Crooked Side (Republicans) it is all
}> about looting the country for all the money and power you
}> can squeeze out of it and then leave the bankrupted mess for
}> a democrat to clean up. It's 1928 all over again...............
}>
}>
}> Mitchell Holman
}
}Pure unadulterated bullshit.
}
Really?
Name the last GOP president who did not plunge
us into a recession.
bill
<CF618F52AFE862AF.47BA762F...@lp.airnews.net>,
ta2...@airmail.net (Mitchell Holman) wrote:
> In article <tsurber-ya02408000R0403010739310001@news-server>,
tsu...@columbus.rr.com (bill) wrote:
> }In article
> }<BFF77F26DBB23902.ED91C321...@lp.airnews.net>,
> }ta2...@airmail.net (Mitchell Holman) wrote:
> }
> }> In article <pZWn6.16$l5....@news1.iquest.net>, "JD" <dy...@jdyson.com>
> } wrote:
> }> }
> }> }>
> }> }Actually, to the guys on the Dark Side (the Democrats), it is all
> }> }about sex, money and power to hide the illegal activities (rape,
> }> }influence peddling, etc.)
> }> }
> }>
> }> And the guys on the Crooked Side (Republicans) it is all
> }> about looting the country for all the money and power you
> }> can squeeze out of it and then leave the bankrupted mess for
> }> a democrat to clean up. It's 1928 all over again...............
> }>
> }>
> }> Mitchell Holman
> }
> }Pure unadulterated bullshit.
> }
>
> Really?
>
> Name the last GOP president who did not plunge
> us into a recession.
How about two? : )
Reagan and Bush
John S. Dyson
"rave on!" <rsha...@worldnet.att.net> writes:
> JD <dy...@jdyson.com> wrote in message
> news:pZWn6.16$l5....@news1.iquest.net...
>> >
> sex, money
>> and power to hide the illegal activities (rape, influence peddling, etc.)
>>
> your clumsy attempt to dodge as you wallow is duly noted.
>
if they misbehave, while the Dems are appauded (by themselves) for stupid,
disgusting, and illegal behavior.
Clinton has shown an EXTREME lack of respect for embracing someone who
has renounced their citizenship. There is NO case of that in recent
history.
It is obvious that the motivation for Clinton was personal enrichment...
Clinton is NO Mr. Washington :-). In fact, Clinton doesn't even make
it up to the Nixon level, because once he realized that it would be
best for the country, Mr. Nixon resigned. Even as a slightly unbalanced
man, Mr. Nixon made the right decision.
It isn't clear that Clinton is actually unbalanced, but his behavior is
consistantly that of a con-man or grifter. When reviewing alot of the
current group of controlling Democrats, it does appear that the Democrat
party is indeed the party of 'grift.'
Nope, I am not dodging anything, but only passively observing as an
independent, and as someone who hasn't voted a straight ticket in
years. Of course, there are SOME honest Democrats, but it is also
clear that the Democrats (even those who SEEM honest) will vote for
party first, then country.
It is becoming clear that the educated middle class (those who must
work for a living) have only one major party who works for their needs,
and that is the GOP. The Dems just lie too much, and much more so
than the GOP (which the GOP IS NOT PERFECT.)
When thinking back about voting for a Dem (even one who deserves
a vote from someone who really cares about the country in a thinking
way), I feel like I have been involved with very dirty people. I
don't think that voting for a Democrat could possibly be the right thing
until they get rid of the liars and creeps who seem to rule the party.
(It makes me wonder if one can get VD from a voting machine when voting
for a Democrat... Ever noticed that the switches for Democrat candidates
on the old voting machines seem to have a green ooze dripping from
them? :-). Some of the GOP switches just look a little dirty, and
probably need just a little cleaning and polishing.)
John
John S. Dyson
tsu...@columbus.rr.com (bill) writes:
>
> Yeah liberal media's search for ratings not facts or balance or objectivity.
> Watch FOX news.
> They skewer both sides
>
aren't biased against any one party more than the other. I applaud them,
and highly respect Mr. O'Reilly. It is sometimes interesting to watch
him for a while and think that he is a 'conservative' or 'anti-democrat',
and then see him be as critical about the GOP a few minutes later. We
need more journalists who don't let spin be represented as fact, and
perhaps that is one reason why the Dems have been allowed to lie for so
very long.
I barely even look at CNN anymore, simply because I don't have time in
my life to watch something with such weak reporting, and too much of
the 'good ole boy' attitude with politicians. The politicians and
newspeople are not colleagues, but they seem to act like it... Take
a look at where the media seems to get alot of it's new personnel!!!
(Hint, the gov't!!!) Fox is also guilty of that, but it seems like
the people that they got from the Clinton admin have been honest about
the goings-on in that admin. I have even seen GOP politicians run
one or two of the various news/talk shows and they weren't all that
aggressively pro-GOP. There must be an enforced policy at Fox that
they MUST be unbiased.
John