bush and cheney ignored warnings about al qaeda and america paid the price...
abe lincoln
all the dems warnings about al qaeda and the us paid the price 18
months after they took office....
the weak on terrorism repugnant assholes presided over the worst
terrorist attack on us soil, on their watch...
the neocon assfuckers were too busy living out their get saddam and
iraq's oil wet dream to pay attention to al qaeda and the american
citizens have paid the price....
now after 8 years of repugnant neglect, commander in chief obama has
to clean up their fucking mess in afghanistan and mediate the
withdrawal of us foces from the iraqi civil war that bush and cheney
started...
are the repugnant retards the most fucking un-american bastards you've
ever seen or what....?
they waste 3 trillion us dollars, sacrifice 5000 us soldiers for a
failed attempt to steal iraq's oil, cause the deaths of a million
iraqi civilians, and stand by while al qaeda and the taliban re-group
in afghanistan...the repugnants and their neocon assfucking partners
are america's worst enemy...they're enemy number one to america's
national security...
it's time for justice...it's always time for justice in america...
Deaf Power
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:19:27 -0500, Nathan Bedford Forrest
<N...@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>Psssst, moron, Bush is no longer President.
That's a good thing.
>Cheney is no longer Vice President.
That's a good thing. Actually he's no longer a President. But he's
still farting loud it stinks.
>The majority of Americans wish they were instead of the
>incompetent asshole we now have.
Obama was elected by the majority. You're not the majority. You're a
fart.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 3 Jan 2010 08:44:23 -0800 (PST), abe lincoln
><honest.abe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>the incompetent fool and the blood for oil halliburton whore ignored
>>all the dems warnings about al qaeda and the us paid the price 18
>>months after they took office....
>
>
>
>99% of dims were yelling to attack Iraq. BWAHAHAHA
>
>Get your facts straight, jerk.
>
>
>
>>the weak on terrorism repugnant assholes presided over the worst
>>terrorist attack on us soil, on their watch...
>>
>>the neocon assfuckers were too busy living out their get saddam and
>>iraq's oil wet dream to pay attention to al qaeda and the american
>>citizens have paid the price....
>>
>>now after 8 years of repugnant neglect, commander in chief obama has
>>to clean up their fucking mess in afghanistan and mediate the
>>withdrawal of us foces from the iraqi civil war that bush and cheney
>>started...
>>
>>are the repugnant retards the most fucking un-american bastards you've
>>ever seen or what....?
>>
>>they waste 3 trillion us dollars, sacrifice 5000 us soldiers for a
>>failed attempt to steal iraq's oil, cause the deaths of a million
>>iraqi civilians, and stand by while al qaeda and the taliban re-group
>>in afghanistan...the repugnants and their neocon assfucking partners
>>are america's worst enemy...they're enemy number one to america's
>>national security...
>>
>>it's time for justice...it's always time for justice in america...
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>A VOTE FOR A DIM IS A VOTE FOR CORRUPTION AND SOCIALISM.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------
>
>LIBERALS SPEND HALF THEIR LIVES BENDING OVER AND THE
>OTHER HALF ON THEIR KNEES.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>
> FIGHT ORGANIZED CRIME........VOTE A LIBERAL OUT OF OFFICE.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Somewhere in Kenya they are missing their idiot.
>Hey........He's over here.
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>
Morton Davis
"Deaf Power" <de...@power.com> wrote in message
news:vj05k5pegg7rcb640...@4ax.com...
>
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 08:19:27 -0500, Nathan Bedford Forrest
> <N...@HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Psssst, moron, Bush is no longer President.
>
> That's a good thing.
>
It's a bad thing that fucking moron, Obama is president.
HONEYpot
Osama bin Laden publicly predicted in 1999 that if ever the U.S. ("The
Great Satan") invaded Muslim territory, TGS would be either trapped
indefinitely, or
forced to leave in defeat.
Do we have any indications that his forecast is inoperable?
--------------------------------
"Pakistan worried U.S. buildup in Afghanistan will send militants
across border"
By Karin Brulliard
Washington Post Foreign Service
Tuesday, January 5, 2010; A06
ISLAMABAD, PAKISTAN -- As 30,000 U.S. troops begin to deploy to
Afghanistan, fears are rising in Pakistan that a stepped-up war just
over the border could worsen the increasingly bloody struggle with
militancy here.
Residents in border areas such as the violence-plagued city of
Peshawar worry that a tide of militants could flee Afghanistan to seek
targets in Pakistan. Doubts linger among Pakistani security officials
about the Americans' ability to intensify the campaign against the
Taliban without further destabilizing Pakistan's vast southwestern
border or the already volatile tribal areas in the northwest.
"With a surge in American troops across the border, the militants
facing pressure could come to our place, which will destroy peace and
stability," said Haji Adam Khan, the top official in Qilla Abdullah, a
mountainous Pakistani district that abuts Kandahar province in
southern Afghanistan.
U.S. officials disagree with that assessment, reflecting the
undercurrents of mistrust between allies whose relationship President
Obama has called crucial to success in Afghanistan. Pakistani
reservations about the U.S. strategy highlight the limits of an
American-led war campaign in Afghanistan that must stop at a famously
porous border -- Pakistan does not allow U.S. troops to fight on its
soil -- even if the enemy crosses over.
A wave of bombings has swept Pakistan since October, devastating
Peshawar but also reaching far beyond the troubled northwest. Attacks
on places believed to be safe, such as the military headquarters in
Rawalpindi and a popular market in the eastern city of Lahore, have
struck fear into the population.
Last week, Pakistan's foreign minister warned in a statement that the
U.S. troop buildup could magnify the problems by bringing an "influx
of militants and refugees from Afghanistan into Pakistan." The U.S.
invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 led thousands of Taliban and al-Qaeda
members to flee the fighting and seek refuge in Pakistan. Since then,
insurgents have continued to use Pakistan as a staging ground for
launching attacks into Afghanistan and within Pakistan.
When U.S. troops launched a major offensive in Afghanistan's Helmand
province last summer, Pakistani officials feared a fresh influx of
militants into their territory. But that did not occur, U.S. and
Pakistani military officials said.
"I think it's somewhat exaggerated," Talat Masood, a retired Pakistani
general and security analyst, said of Pakistani fears about a surge of
militants. "Why should they come here? They already have all the space
they need in Helmand" and other Afghan border provinces, he said.
U.S. military officials said they are working closely with Pakistan's
security forces ahead of the troop increase. They note that a stream
of top American officials has visited Pakistan to seek support for the
strategy.
A senior U.S. military official in Pakistan said a spillover of
militancy or refugees is unlikely, in part because of regular meetings
in which officials from both nations discuss "where we think the
forces are going to go, and if that would cause issues." The Pakistani
military is less sure. It is already stretched thin by military
operations in South Waziristan and other tribal areas against the
Pakistani Taliban, the group it blames for most domestic attacks.
The American plan to focus on control of Afghan cities and improve
governance is positive, a Pakistani military official said, but
Pakistan fears that U.S. forces might also "go on a wild goose chase"
of targeting Taliban fighters without guarding borders. That could
push fighters into Pakistan's tribal areas, reversing military gains
there, or into Baluchistan in the southwest, where Pakistan -- which
concentrates its forces in the northwest and along the eastern border
region with arch-rival India -- has insufficient troops, the official
said.
Whether or not the new U.S. strategy in Afghanistan fuels violence in
Pakistan, the border is likely to be a vexing problem for troops. It
is certain that militants will seek refuge in Pakistan, but it is just
as likely that extremists based in Pakistan will "follow the sound of
the guns" into Afghanistan, a senior U.S. military official in
Afghanistan said.
Bolstering border security is a "key part of the strategy" to prevent
both militant movement and the import of bombmaking supplies into
Afghanistan, the U.S. official said. But the official also suggested
that Pakistan could assist more, by moving troops from the Indian
border and by focusing more on "eliminating" key insurgent leaders to
consolidate its military gains.
Pakistan has not captured top Pakistani Taliban insurgents during its
two-month-old operation in South Waziristan and has declined to pursue
the Haqqani network and other groups that attack U.S. forces in
Afghanistan.
In the border areas where militants already reign supreme, some
observers say they are sure a spike in fighters and bloodshed is on
the way. That could lead to more U.S. strikes by umanned aircraft -- a
possibility American officials have hinted at.
"This will increase bomb blasts, suicide bombs and militants," said
Nizam Dawar, chairman of the Tribal Development Forum, an umbrella
group of nongovernmental agencies in Pakistan's lawless tribal belt.
But Dawar said he thinks rattled residents are eager for the U.S.
troop buildup because they have lost faith in Pakistan's military to
tackle extremism. What they fear is the potential drawdown of U.S.
forces from Afghanistan starting in 2011, he said.
In the tribal areas, where foreign insurgents mix with the local
population, word is already circulating about the jobs militant
leaders plan to claim in the Afghan and Pakistani governments they
expect to capture once Western soldiers leave, Dawar said.
The troop buildup, with its timeline for starting the withdrawal, he
said, "is good news for the Taliban."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/04/AR2010010403335.html?hpid=topnews
Deaf Power
On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 22:42:56 -0600, "Morton Davis" <anti...@go.com>
wrote:
It's a bad thing you're still alive. Wish you were aborted.
spicpussy
BUT WHAT TO DO?